PMCC PMCC

Search tips
Search criteria

Advanced
Results 1-8 (8)
 

Clipboard (0)
None
Journals
Authors
Year of Publication
Document Types
1.  Fast neutron relative biological effects and implications for charged particle therapy 
The British Journal of Radiology  2011;84(Special_Issue_1):S011-S018.
In two fast neutron data sets, comprising in vitro and in vivo experiments, an inverse relationship is found between the low-linear energy transfer (LET) α/β ratio and the maximum value of relative biological effect (RBEmax), while the minimum relative biological effect (RBEmin) is linearly related to the square root of the low-LET α/β ratio. RBEmax is the RBE at near zero dose and can be represented by the ratio of the α parameters at high- and low-LET radiation exposures. RBEmin is the RBE at very high dose and can be represented by the ratio of the square roots of the β parameters at high- and low-LET radiation exposures. In principle, it may be possible to use the low-LET α/β ratio to predict RBEmax and RBEmin, providing that other LET-related parameters, which reflect intercept and slopes of these relationships, are used. These two limits of RBE determine the intermediate values of RBE at any dose per fraction; therefore, it is possible to find the RBE at any dose per fraction. Although these results are obtained from fast neutron experiments, there are implications for charged particle therapy using protons (when RBE is scaled downwards) and for heavier ion beams (where the magnitude of RBE is similar to that for fast neutrons). In the case of fast neutrons, late reacting normal tissue systems and very slow growing tumours, which have the smallest values of the low-LET α/β ratio, are predicted to have the highest RBE values at low fractional doses, but the lowest values of RBE at higher doses when they are compared with early reacting tissues and fast growing tumour systems that have the largest low-LET α/β ratios.
doi:10.1259/bjr/67509851
PMCID: PMC3473886  PMID: 22374547
2.  Malignant induction probability maps for radiotherapy using X-ray and proton beams 
The British Journal of Radiology  2011;84(Special_Issue_1):S070-S078.
The aim of this study was to display malignant induction probability (MIP) maps alongside dose distribution maps for radiotherapy using X-ray and charged particles such as protons. Dose distributions for X-rays and protons are used in an interactive MATLAB® program (MathWorks, Natick, MA). The MIP is calculated using a published linear quadratic model, which incorporates fractionation effects, cell killing and cancer induction as a function of dose, as well as relative biological effect. Two virtual situations are modelled: (a) a tumour placed centrally in a cubic volume of normal tissue and (b) the same tumour placed closer to the skin surface. The MIP is calculated for a variety of treatment field options. The results show that, for protons, the MIP increases with field numbers. In such cases, proton MIP can be higher than that for X-rays. Protons produce the lowest MIPs for superficial targets because of the lack of exit dose. The addition of a dose bath to all normal tissues increases the MIP by up to an order of magnitude. This exploratory study shows that it is possible to achieve three-dimensional displays of carcinogenesis risk. The importance of treatment geometry, including the length and volume of tissue traversed by each beam, can all influence MIP. Reducing the volume of tissue irradiated is advantageous, as reducing the number of cells at risk reduces the total MIP. This finding lends further support to the use of treatment gantries as well as the use of simpler field arrangements for particle therapy provided normal tissue tolerances are respected.
doi:10.1259/bjr/70190973
PMCID: PMC3473888  PMID: 22374550
3.  The potential impact of relative biological effectiveness uncertainty on charged particle treatment prescriptions 
The British Journal of Radiology  2011;84(Special_Issue_1):S061-S069.
There continues to be uncertainty regarding the relative biological effectiveness (RBE) values that should be used in charged particle radiotherapy (CPT) prescriptions using protons and heavier ions. This uncertainty could potentially offset the physical dose advantage gained by exploiting the Bragg peak effect and it needs to be clearly understood by clinicians and physicists. This paper introduces a combined radiobiological and physical sparing factor (S). This factor includes the ratio of the most relevant physical doses in tumour and normal tissues in combination with their respective RBE values and can be extended to contain the uncertainties in RBE. S factors can be used to study, in a simplified way for tentative modelling, those clinical situations in which high-linear energy transfer (LET) irradiations are likely to prove preferable over their low-LET counterparts for a matched tumour iso-effect. In cases where CPT achieves an excellent degree of normal tissue sparing, the radiobiological factors become less important and any uncertainties in the tumour and healthy tissue RBE values are correspondingly less problematic. When less normal tissue sparing can be achieved, however, the RBE uncertainties assume greater relevance and will affect the reliability of the dose-prescription methodology. More research is required to provide accurate RBE estimation, focusing attention on the associated statistical uncertainties and potential differences in RBE between different tissue types.
doi:10.1259/bjr/36792876
PMCID: PMC3473889  PMID: 22374549
4.  Accelerator science in medical physics 
The British Journal of Radiology  2011;84(Special_Issue_1):S004-S010.
The use of cyclotrons and synchrotrons to accelerate charged particles in hospital settings for the purpose of cancer therapy is increasing. Consequently, there is a growing demand from medical physicists, radiographers, physicians and oncologists for articles that explain the basic physical concepts of these technologies. There are unique advantages and disadvantages to all methods of acceleration. Several promising alternative methods of accelerating particles also have to be considered since they will become increasingly available with time; however, there are still many technical problems with these that require solving. This article serves as an introduction to this complex area of physics, and will be of benefit to those engaged in cancer therapy, or who intend to acquire such technologies in the future.
doi:10.1259/bjr/16022594
PMCID: PMC3473892  PMID: 22374548
5.  Investing in science: securing future prosperity 
The British Journal of Radiology  2011;84(1001):389-392.
A meeting concerned with UK science and technology investment was held at Chatham House, London, in November 2010. The UK science and technology research budget has been preserved at a fixed cash level whereas other areas of government face significant reductions in their financial support. This is in marked contrast to some East Asian countries, such as China, where investment in science and technology is increasing. The UK needs to change many aspects of education at school level and beyond to preserve its status as a first rate scientific country. It also has to solve the long-term problem, with some notable exceptions, of being unable to translate basic research discoveries into manufactured products. This article discusses the impact of these issues along with some tentative suggestions on how to improve these, with particular reference to the radiological sciences.
doi:10.1259/bjr/64183983
PMCID: PMC3473654  PMID: 21511747
6.  ENLIGHT and other EU-funded projects in hadron therapy 
The British Journal of Radiology  2010;83(994):811-813.
Following impressive results from early phase trials in Japan and Germany, there is a current expansion in European hadron therapy. This article summarises present European Union-funded projects for research and co-ordination of hadron therapy across Europe. Our primary focus will be on the research questions associated with carbon ion treatment of cancer, but these considerations are also applicable to treatments using proton beams and other light ions. The challenges inherent in this new form of radiotherapy require maximum interdisciplinary co-ordination. On the basis of its successful track record in particle and accelerator physics, the internationally funded CERN laboratories (otherwise known as the European Organisation for Nuclear Research) have been instrumental in promoting collaborations for research purposes in this area of radiation oncology. There will soon be increased opportunities for referral of patients across Europe for hadron therapy. Oncologists should be aware of these developments, which confer enhanced prospects for better cancer cure rates as well as improved quality of life in many cancer patients.
doi:10.1259/bjr/49490647
PMCID: PMC3473750  PMID: 20846982
7.  The apparent increase in the β-parameter of the linear quadratic model with increased linear energy transfer during fast neutron irradiation 
The British Journal of Radiology  2010;83(989):433-436.
The issue of whether the β-parameter of the linear quadratic model changes with linear energy transfer (LET) remains controversial. Retrospective analysis of UK fast neutron experimental data using human cell lines at Clatterbridge shows that the β-parameter of the linear quadratic model probably does increase with LET during neutron irradiation. For cells without a deficiency in DNA damage repair and for experiments in which β-parameter estimates were considered to be unreliably low, a provisional relationship of βH = 1.82 βL was found (where the suffixes refer to high and low LET exposures, respectively). This implies that √β increases by around 1.35 in the specific case of 62.5 MeV neutrons relative to 4 MeV X-rays. Increments in the β-parameter with LET influence the relative biological effect (RBE), especially at high doses per fraction. Large fractions are being used in experimental carbon ion therapy, in which broadly similar RBE values to fast neutrons are found. These interesting findings after fast neutron exposure need to be studied further for applications in charged particle beam therapy using light ions, which is presently undergoing a worldwide expansion.
doi:10.1259/bjr/68792966
PMCID: PMC3473575  PMID: 20019177

Results 1-8 (8)