PMCC PMCC

Search tips
Search criteria

Advanced
Results 1-2 (2)
 

Clipboard (0)
None
Journals
Authors
more »
Year of Publication
Document Types
1.  Ondansetron Does Not Reduce the Shivering Threshold in Healthy Volunteers 
British journal of anaesthesia  2006;96(6):732-737.
Summary
Background
Ondansetron, a serotonin-3 receptor antagonist, reduces postoperative shivering. Drugs that reduce shivering usually impair central thermoregulatory control and may thus be useful for preventing shivering during induction of therapeutic hypothermia. We determined, therefore, whether ondansetron reduces the major autonomic thermoregulatory response thresholds (trigging core temperatures) in humans.
Methods
Ten healthy volunteers were studied on two days: Control and Ondansetron (intravenous infusion to plasma concentrations of 278 (57) ng mL−1, 234 (55) ng mL−1, and 243 (58) ng mL−1at the sweating, vasoconstriction, and shivering thresholds, respectively); this corresponded to ≈50 mg of ondansetron which is roughly ten times the dose used for postoperative nausea and vomiting. Each day, skin and core temperatures were increased to provoke sweating, then reduced to elicit peripheral vasoconstriction and shivering. We determined the core-temperature sweating, vasoconstriction, and shivering thresholds after compensating for changes in mean-skin temperature. Data were analyzed with paired t tests and presented as means (SD)s; P<0.05 was statistically significant.
Results
Ondansetron did not change the sweating (Control: 37.4 (0.4)°C, Ondansetron: 37.6 (0.3)°C, P=0.16), vasoconstriction (37.0 (0.5) vs. 37.1 (0.3)°C; P=0.70), or shivering threshold (36.3 (0.5) vs. 36.3 (0.6)°C; P=0.76). No sedation was observed on either study day.
Conclusions
Ondansetron, therefore, appears to have little potential for facilitating induction of therapeutic hypothermia.
doi:10.1093/bja/ael101
PMCID: PMC1502385  PMID: 16675509
Thermoregulation; ondansetron; therapeutic hypothermia
2.  The Intubating Laryngeal Mask Airway Allows Tracheal Intubation When the Cervical Spine Is Immobilized by a Rigid Collar 
British journal of anaesthesia  2004;93(5):655-659.
Summary
An intubating laryngeal mask airway (ILMA) facilitates tracheal intubation with the neck in neutral position, which is similar to the neck position maintained by a rigid cervical collar. However, a cervical collar virtually obliterates neck movement, even the small movements that normally facilitate airway insertion. We therefore tested the hypothesis that the ILMA facilitates tracheal intubation even in patients wearing a rigid cervical collar. In 50 cervical spine surgery patients with a rigid Philadelphia collar in place and 50 general surgery patients under general anaesthesia, we performed blind tracheal intubation via an ILMA. The time required for intubation, intubation success rate, and numbers and type of adjusting manoeuvres employed were recorded. Inter-incisor distance was significantly smaller (4.1 [0.8] cm vs. 4.6 [0.7] cm, mean [SD], P<0.01) and Mallampati scores were significantly greater (P<0.001) in the collared patients. ILMA insertion took longer (30 [25] vs. 22 [6] seconds), more patients required 2 insertion attempts (15 vs. 3; P<0.005), and ventilation adequacy with ILMA was worse (P<0.05) in collared patients. However, there were no significant differences between the collared and control patients in terms of total time required for intubation (60 [41] vs. 50 [30] seconds), number of intubation attempts, overall intubation success rate (96 vs. 98%), or the incidence of intubation complications. Blind intubation through an ILMA is thus a reasonable strategy for controlling the airway in patients who are immobilized with a rigid cervical collar, especially when urgency precludes a fiberoptic approach.
doi:10.1093/bja/aeh248
PMCID: PMC1283102  PMID: 15321932
anaesthesia; intubation; tracheal; laryngeal mask; cervical collar

Results 1-2 (2)