PMCC PMCC

Search tips
Search criteria

Advanced
Results 1-5 (5)
 

Clipboard (0)
None
Journals
Authors
Year of Publication
jtitle_s:("anesti Prog")
1.  Practice Characteristics Among Dental Anesthesia Providers in the United States 
Anesthesia Progress  2010;57(2):52-58.
Abstract
General descriptions or “snapshots” of sedation/general anesthesia practices during dental care are very limited in reviewed literature. The objective of this study was to determine commonalities in dental sedation/anesthesia practices, as well as to accumulate subjective information pertaining to sedation/anesthesia care within the dental profession. This questionnaire-based survey was completed by participating anesthesia providers in the United States. A standardized questionnaire was sent via facsimile, or was delivered by mail, to 1500 anesthesia providers from a randomized list using an online database. Data from the returned questionnaires were entered onto an Excel spreadsheet and were imported into a JMP Statistical Discovery Software program for analyses. Quantitative evaluations were confined to summation of variables, an estimation of means, and a valid percent for identified variables. A total of 717 questionnaires were entered for data analysis (N  =  717). Data from this study demonstrate the wide variation that exists in sedation/anesthesia care and those providing its administration during dental treatment in the United States. The demographics of this randomized population show anesthesia providers involved in all disciplines of the dental profession, as well as significant variation in the types of modalities used for sedation/anesthesia care. Data from this study reveal wide variation in sedation/anesthesia care during dental treatment. These distinctions include representation of sedation/anesthesia providers across all disciplines of the dental profession, as well as variations in the techniques used for sedation/anesthesia care.
doi:10.2344/0003-3006-57.2.52
PMCID: PMC2886918  PMID: 20553135
Anesthesia; Dentistry; Practice characteristics; Techniques
2.  A Clinical Trial in Oral Surgery of the Analgesic Efficacy of a Suprofen/Codeine Combination 
Anesthesia Progress  1987;34(5):177-180.
Suprofen as well as codeine have been shown to be effective analgesics. In this study, a 200-mg suprofen/60-mg codeine dose is scored for analgesic efficacy and safety compared to suprofen (200 mg), codeine (60 mg), and placebo. One hundred sixty-five healthy, adult patients were asked to rate degree of pain experienced over a six-hour period after medication. The combination treatment was found to offer maximum pain relief. Dentists should be aware that flank pain and renal function abnormalities have been reported in postmarketing surveillance.
PMCID: PMC2148546  PMID: 3479917
3.  The Incidence of Post-Extraction Pain and Analgesic Usage in Children 
Anesthesia Progress  1986;33(3):147-151.
A parentally completed questionnaire was used to investigate the incidence of post-extraction pain in children. Significantly more patients in the study group reported pain following dental extraction than did control patients. Increasing age was significantly associated with the report of pain, but not with the use of a pain medication, even when the degree of difficulty of the extraction procedure was standardized. These findings suggest that the report of pain represents a late learned response while medication usage represents an early learned response. Those patients that reported increased severity of pain were significantly more likely to require a pain medication, but the pain medication was most effective for only mild pain. Additionally, male patients were significantly more likely to report complete effectiveness when pain medication was used. Contrary to some popularly held beliefs, the results of this study indicate that children do experience post-extraction pain and some children experience pain of sufficient intensity to require an analgesic for relief of post-extraction pain. Additionally, for a small group of patients, neither aspirin nor acetaminophen are adequate in fully relieving post-extraction discomfort. For these patients other agents may be indicated to fully relieve pain.
PMCID: PMC2175470  PMID: 3461727
4.  In Response 
Anesthesia Progress  1986;33(2):106.
PMCID: PMC2175460
5.  Risk Appraisal of Narcotic Sedation for Children 
Anesthesia Progress  1985;32(4):129-139.
Since the use of narcotics was initially advocated 28 years ago, serious adverse reactions, including fatalities, have been reported. At least four factors appear to contribute to these reactions: multiple drug administration, excessive dosage, inadequate monitoring, and ineffectual emergency care. Because of the relatively high incidence of life-threatening reactions and the complexity of the required emergency care, the routine use of pediatric sedation techniques that require large doses of narcotics cannot be advocated for use in the private office.
PMCID: PMC2148533  PMID: 2866736

Results 1-5 (5)