PMCC PMCC

Search tips
Search criteria

Advanced
Results 1-3 (3)
 

Clipboard (0)
None
Journals
Authors
Year of Publication
Document Types
1.  Comment on Timely deposition of macromolecular structures is necessary for peer review by Joosten et al. (2013) 
A response to the article by Joosten et al. [(2013), Acta Cryst. D69, 2293–2295].
The wwPDB responds to the article by Joosten et al. [(2013), Acta Cryst. D69, 2293–2295].
doi:10.1107/S0907444913029168
PMCID: PMC3852647  PMID: 24311570
wwPDB; deposition; macromolecular data
2.  Comment on On the propagation of errors by Jaskolski (2013) 
A response to the article by Jaskolski [(2013), Acta Cryst. D69, 1865–1866].
The wwPDB responds to the article by Jaskolski [(2013), Acta Cryst. D69, 1865–1866].
doi:10.1107/S090744491302917X
PMCID: PMC3852648  PMID: 24311571
wwPDB; errors; 
3.  Is too ‘creative’ language acceptable in crystallography? 
A brief comment is made on the need to use carefully selected, novel terms in crystallographic publications, especially publications addressing non-specialists.
While figures of speech are often useful and even educational, flashy titles combined with hyperbolae and imprecise language can mislead or deceive non-specialist readers and should therefore be avoided. The possibility of such confusion exists when poorly defined terms like ‘structure quality’ or ‘super-resolution’ are used to describe a protein structure.
doi:10.1107/S090744491002799X
PMCID: PMC2935284  PMID: 20823556
letters to the editor; crystallographic terminology

Results 1-3 (3)