PMCC PMCC

Search tips
Search criteria

Advanced
Results 1-4 (4)
 

Clipboard (0)
None
Journals
Authors
more »
Year of Publication
Document Types
issn:1618-727
1.  The Effect of Wireless LAN-Based PACS Device for Portable Imaging Modalities 
The aim of this study was to develop wireless Picture Archiving and Communication System (PACS) device and to analyze its effect on image transfer from portable imaging modalities to the main PACS server. Using a laptop computer equipped with wireless local area network (LAN), the authors developed a wireless PACS device with DICOM modality worklist and DICOM storage server modules. This laptop computer could be easily fixed to portable imaging modalities such as ultrasound machines. From May to August 2007, 112 portable examinations were evaluated. Of these, 62 were done with wireless LAN-based PACS device, and 50 were done without wireless PACS device. To evaluate the impact of the wireless LAN-based PACS device on productivity and workflow, we analyzed the mean time delay and standard deviations (SD) both in cases where wireless LAN-based PACS device was used and in cases where it was not used. Statistical analysis was performed using a t test. The mean time interval from image acquisition to storage in the main PACS when the wireless LAN-based PACS device was used was 342.4 s (5 min and 42.4 s, SD = 509.2 s). When the wireless PACS was not used, the mean time interval was 2,305.5 s (38 min and 25.5 s, SD = 1,371.8 s). The mean time interval was statistically different between the two groups (t test, p < 0.001). The wireless LAN-based PACS device could help in reducing the storage intervals of images obtained by portable machines and in promoting effective and rapid treatment of patients who have undergone portable imaging examinations.
doi:10.1007/s10278-008-9174-4
PMCID: PMC3043767  PMID: 19137373
Wireless LAN; portable modalities; productivity; workflow
2.  Summation or Axial Slab Average Intensity Projection of Abdominal Thin-section CT Datasets: Can They Substitute for the Primary Reconstruction from Raw Projection Data? 
Journal of Digital Imaging  2007;21(4):422-432.
We hypothesized that that the summation or axial slab average intensity projection (AIP) techniques can substitute for the primary reconstruction (PR) from a raw projection data for abdominal applications. To compare with PR datasets (5-mm thick, 20% overlap) in 150 abdominal studies, corresponding summation and AIP datasets were calculated from 2-mm thick images (50% overlap). The root-mean-square error between PR and summation images was significantly greater than that between PR and AIP images (9.55 [median] vs. 7.12, p < 0.0001, Wilcoxon signed-ranks test). Four radiologists independently compared 2,000 test images (PR [as control], summation, or AIP) and their corresponding PR images to prove that the identicalness of summation or AIP images to PR images was not 1% less than the assessed identicalness of PR images to themselves (Wald-type test for clustered matched-pair data in a non-inferiority design). For each reader, both summation and AIP images were not inferior to PR images in terms of being rated identical to PR (p < 0.05). Although summation and AIP techniques produce images that differ from PR images, these differences are not easily perceived by radiologists. Thus, the summation or AIP techniques can substitute for PR for the primary interpretation of abdominal CT.
doi:10.1007/s10278-007-9067-y
PMCID: PMC3043854  PMID: 17805929
Tomography; spiral computed-image processing; computer-assisted-imaging; three-dimensional-image interpretation; computer-assisted-information storage and retrieval
3.  On-the-fly Generation of Multiplanar Reformation Images Independent of CT Scanner Type 
Journal of Digital Imaging  2007;21(3):306-311.
We propose a system that automatically generates multiplanar reformation (MPR) images on-the-fly, which is independent of computed tomography (CT) scanner type. Triggered by digital imaging communication in medicine (DICOM) Storage Commitment or in a time threshold manner, this system generates MPR images from received thin-section CT data sets with predefined reformation parameters and then sends MPR images to DICOM stations. Users can specify the reformation parameters and the destination of the resulting MPR images for each CT study description. A pilot system was tested for 3 months. From thin-section data sets received from two 16- and one 64-detector-row CT scanners, this system generated MPR images and sent them to the picture archiving and communication system (PACS) without failure or any additional human operation. For 143 test thin-section CT studies (172–4,761 images in each study), the time to store reformatted images (axial and coronal with 5-mm thicknesses and 4-mm intervals) in PACS after the completion of the CT scan ranged from 92 to 1,772 s (mean  SD, 555.1  509.4).
doi:10.1007/s10278-007-9032-9
PMCID: PMC3043839  PMID: 17384976
Multidetector-row computed tomography; multiplanar reformation; automation
4.  Managing the CT Data Explosion: Initial Experiences of Archiving Volumetric Datasets in a Mini-PACS 
Journal of Digital Imaging  2005;18(3):188-195.
Two image datasets (one thick section dataset and another volumetric dataset) were typically reconstructed from each single CT projection data. The volumetric dataset was stored in a mini-PACS with 271-Gb online and 680-Gb nearline storage and routed to radiologists’ workstations, whereas the thick section dataset was stored in the main PACS. Over a 5-month sample period, 278 Gb of CT data (8976 examinations) was stored in the main PACS, and 738 Gb of volumetric datasets (6193 examinations) was stored in the mini-PACS. The volumetric datasets formed 32.8% of total data for all modalities (2.20 Tb) in the main PACS and mini-PACS combined. At the end of this period, the volumetric datasets of 1892 and 5162 examinations were kept online and nearline, respectively. Mini-PACS offers an effective method of archiving every volumetric dataset and delivering it to radiologists.
doi:10.1007/s10278-005-5163-z
PMCID: PMC3046710  PMID: 15924274
Multidetector row computed tomography; volumetric dataset; mini-PACS

Results 1-4 (4)