PMCC PMCC

Search tips
Search criteria

Advanced
Results 1-4 (4)
 

Clipboard (0)
None

Select a Filter Below

Journals
Year of Publication
Document Types
1.  9q31.2-rs865686 as a Susceptibility Locus for Estrogen Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer: Evidence from the Breast Cancer Association Consortium 
Warren, Helen | Dudbridge, Frank | Fletcher, Olivia | Orr, Nick | Johnson, Nichola | Hopper, John L. | Apicella, Carmel | Southey, Melissa C. | Mahmoodi, Maryam | Schmidt, Marjanka K. | Broeks, Annegien | Cornelissen, Sten | Braaf, Linda M. | Muir, Kenneth R. | Lophatananon, Artitaya | Chaiwerawattana, Arkom | Wiangnon, Surapon | Fasching, Peter A. | Beckmann, Matthias W. | Ekici, Arif B. | Schulz-Wendtland, Ruediger | Sawyer, Elinor J. | Tomlinson, Ian | Kerin, Michael | Burwinkel, Barbara | Marme, Frederik | Schneeweiss, Andreas | Sohn, Christof | Guénel, Pascal | Truong, Thérèse | Laurent-Puig, Pierre | Mulot, Claire | Bojesen, Stig E | Nielsen, Sune F. | Flyger, Henrik | Nordestgaard, Børge G | Milne, Roger L. | Benítez, Javier | Arias-Pérez, José-Ignacio | Zamora, M. Pilar | Anton-Culver, Hoda | Ziogas, Argyrios | Bernstein, Leslie | Dur, Christina Clarke | Brenner, Hermann | Müller, Heiko | Arndt, Volker | Langheinz, Anne | Meindl, Alfons | Golatta, Michael | Bartram, Claus R. | Schmutzler, Rita K. | Brauch, Hiltrud | Justenhoven, Christina | Brüning, Thomas | Chang-Claude, Jenny | Wang-Gohrke, Shan | Eilber, Ursula | Dörk, Thilo | Schürmann, Peter | Bremer, Michael | Hillemanns, Peter | Nevanlinna, Heli | Muranen, Taru A. | Aittomäki, Kristiina | Blomqvist, Carl | Bogdanova, Natalia | Antonenkova, Natalia | Rogov, Yuriy | Bermisheva, Marina | Prokofyeva, Darya | Zinnatullina, Guzel | Khusnutdinova, Elza | Lindblom, Annika | Margolin, Sara | Mannermaa, Arto | Kosma, Veli-Matti | Hartikainen, Jaana M. | Kataja, Vesa | Chenevix-Trench, Georgia | Beesley, Jonathan | Chen, Xiaoqing | Lambrechts, Diether | Smeets, Ann | Paridaens, Robert | Weltens, Caroline | Flesch-Janys, Dieter | Buck, Katharina | Behrens, Sabine | Peterlongo, Paolo | Bernard, Loris | Manoukian, Siranoush | Radice, Paolo | Couch, Fergus J. | Vachon, Celine | Wang, Xianshu | Olson, Janet | Giles, Graham | Baglietto, Laura | McLean, Cariona A. | Severi, Gianluca | John, Esther M. | Miron, Alexander | Winqvist, Robert | Pylkäs, Katri | Jukkola-Vuorinen, Arja | Grip, Mervi | Andrulis, Irene L. | Knight, Julia A. | Mulligan, Anna Marie | Weerasooriya, Nayana | Devilee, Peter | Tollenaar, Robert A.E.M. | Martens, John W.M. | Seynaeve, Caroline M. | Hooning, Maartje J. | Hollestelle, Antoinette | Jager, Agnes | Tilanus-Linthorst, Madeleine M.A. | Hall, Per | Czene, Kamila | Liu, Jianjun | Li, Jingmei | Cox, Angela | Cross, Simon S. | Brock, Ian W. | Reed, Malcolm W.R. | Pharoah, Paul | Blows, Fiona M. | Dunning, Alison M. | Ghoussaini, Maya | Ashworth, Alan | Swerdlow, Anthony | Jones, Michael | Schoemaker, Minouk | Easton, Douglas F. | Humphreys, Manjeet | Wang, Qin | Peto, Julian | dos-Santos-Silva, Isabel
Background
Our recent genome-wide association study identified a novel breast cancer susceptibility locus at 9q31.2 (rs865686).
Methods
To further investigate the rs865686–breast cancer association, we conducted a replication study within the Breast Cancer Association Consortium, which comprises 37 case–control studies (48,394 cases, 50,836 controls).
Results
This replication study provides additional strong evidence of an inverse association between rs865686 and breast cancer risk [study-adjusted per G-allele OR, 0.90; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.88; 0.91, P = 2.01 × 10–29] among women of European ancestry. There were ethnic differences in the estimated minor (G)-allele frequency among controls [0.09, 0.30, and 0.38 among, respectively, Asians, Eastern Europeans, and other Europeans; P for heterogeneity (Phet) = 1.3 × 10–143], but no evidence of ethnic differences in per allele OR (Phet = 0.43). rs865686 was associated with estrogen receptor–positive (ER+) disease (per G-allele OR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.86–0.91; P = 3.13 × 10–22) but less strongly, if at all, with ER-negative (ER–) disease (OR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.94–1.02; P = 0.26; Phet = 1.16 × 10–6), with no evidence of independent heterogeneity by progesterone receptor or HER2 status. The strength of the breast cancer association decreased with increasing age at diagnosis, with case-only analysis showing a trend in the number of copies of the G allele with increasing age at diagnosis (P for linear trend = 0.0095), but only among women with ER+ tumors.
Conclusions
This study is the first to show that rs865686 is a susceptibility marker for ER+ breast cancer.
Impact
The findings further support the view that genetic susceptibility varies according to tumor subtype.
doi:10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-12-0526
PMCID: PMC3772723  PMID: 22859399
2.  Breast density as indicator for the use of mammography or MRI to screen women with familial risk for breast cancer (FaMRIsc): a multicentre randomized controlled trial 
BMC Cancer  2012;12:440.
Background
To reduce mortality, women with a family history of breast cancer often start mammography screening at a younger age than the general population. Breast density is high in over 50% of women younger than 50 years. With high breast density, breast cancer incidence increases, but sensitivity of mammography decreases. Therefore, mammography might not be the optimal method for breast cancer screening in young women. Adding MRI increases sensitivity, but also the risk of false-positive results. The limitation of all previous MRI screening studies is that they do not contain a comparison group; all participants received both MRI and mammography. Therefore, we cannot empirically assess in which stage tumours would have been detected by either test.
The aim of the Familial MRI Screening Study (FaMRIsc) is to compare the efficacy of MRI screening to mammography for women with a familial risk. Furthermore, we will assess the influence of breast density.
Methods/Design
This Dutch multicentre, randomized controlled trial, with balanced randomisation (1:1) has a parallel grouped design. Women with a cumulative lifetime risk for breast cancer due to their family history of ≥20%, aged 30–55 years are eligible. Identified BRCA1/2 mutation carriers or women with 50% risk of carrying a mutation are excluded. Group 1 receives yearly mammography and clinical breast examination (n = 1000), and group 2 yearly MRI and clinical breast examination, and mammography biennially (n = 1000).
Primary endpoints are the number and stage of the detected breast cancers in each arm. Secondary endpoints are the number of false-positive results in both screening arms. Furthermore, sensitivity and positive predictive value of both screening strategies will be assessed. Cost-effectiveness of both strategies will be assessed. Analyses will also be performed with mammographic density as stratification factor.
Discussion
Personalized breast cancer screening might optimize mortality reduction with less over diagnosis. Breast density may be a key discriminator for selecting the optimal screening strategy for women < 55 years with familial breast cancer risk; mammography or MRI. These issues are addressed in the FaMRIsc study including high risk women due to a familial predisposition.
Trial registration
Netherland Trial Register NTR2789
doi:10.1186/1471-2407-12-440
PMCID: PMC3488502  PMID: 23031619
Breast cancer; Familial risk; Screening; MRI; Breast density; Cost-effectiveness
3.  Associations of Breast Cancer Risk Factors With Tumor Subtypes: A Pooled Analysis From the Breast Cancer Association Consortium Studies 
Yang, Xiaohong R. | Chang-Claude, Jenny | Goode, Ellen L. | Couch, Fergus J. | Nevanlinna, Heli | Milne, Roger L. | Gaudet, Mia | Schmidt, Marjanka K. | Broeks, Annegien | Cox, Angela | Fasching, Peter A. | Hein, Rebecca | Spurdle, Amanda B. | Blows, Fiona | Driver, Kristy | Flesch-Janys, Dieter | Heinz, Judith | Sinn, Peter | Vrieling, Alina | Heikkinen, Tuomas | Aittomäki, Kristiina | Heikkilä, Päivi | Blomqvist, Carl | Lissowska, Jolanta | Peplonska, Beata | Chanock, Stephen | Figueroa, Jonine | Brinton, Louise | Hall, Per | Czene, Kamila | Humphreys, Keith | Darabi, Hatef | Liu, Jianjun | Van ‘t Veer, Laura J. | van Leeuwen, Flora E. | Andrulis, Irene L. | Glendon, Gord | Knight, Julia A. | Mulligan, Anna Marie | O’Malley, Frances P. | Weerasooriya, Nayana | John, Esther M. | Beckmann, Matthias W. | Hartmann, Arndt | Weihbrecht, Sebastian B. | Wachter, David L. | Jud, Sebastian M. | Loehberg, Christian R. | Baglietto, Laura | English, Dallas R. | Giles, Graham G. | McLean, Catriona A. | Severi, Gianluca | Lambrechts, Diether | Vandorpe, Thijs | Weltens, Caroline | Paridaens, Robert | Smeets, Ann | Neven, Patrick | Wildiers, Hans | Wang, Xianshu | Olson, Janet E. | Cafourek, Victoria | Fredericksen, Zachary | Kosel, Matthew | Vachon, Celine | Cramp, Helen E. | Connley, Daniel | Cross, Simon S. | Balasubramanian, Sabapathy P. | Reed, Malcolm W. R. | Dörk, Thilo | Bremer, Michael | Meyer, Andreas | Karstens, Johann H. | Ay, Aysun | Park-Simon, Tjoung-Won | Hillemanns, Peter | Arias Pérez, Jose Ignacio | Rodríguez, Primitiva Menéndez | Zamora, Pilar | Benítez, Javier | Ko, Yon-Dschun | Fischer, Hans-Peter | Hamann, Ute | Pesch, Beate | Brüning, Thomas | Justenhoven, Christina | Brauch, Hiltrud | Eccles, Diana M. | Tapper, William J. | Gerty, Sue M. | Sawyer, Elinor J. | Tomlinson, Ian P. | Jones, Angela | Kerin, Michael | Miller, Nicola | McInerney, Niall | Anton-Culver, Hoda | Ziogas, Argyrios | Shen, Chen-Yang | Hsiung, Chia-Ni | Wu, Pei-Ei | Yang, Show-Lin | Yu, Jyh-Cherng | Chen, Shou-Tung | Hsu, Giu-Cheng | Haiman, Christopher A. | Henderson, Brian E. | Le Marchand, Loic | Kolonel, Laurence N. | Lindblom, Annika | Margolin, Sara | Jakubowska, Anna | Lubiński, Jan | Huzarski, Tomasz | Byrski, Tomasz | Górski, Bohdan | Gronwald, Jacek | Hooning, Maartje J. | Hollestelle, Antoinette | van den Ouweland, Ans M. W. | Jager, Agnes | Kriege, Mieke | Tilanus-Linthorst, Madeleine M. A. | Collée, Margriet | Wang-Gohrke, Shan | Pylkäs, Katri | Jukkola-Vuorinen, Arja | Mononen, Kari | Grip, Mervi | Hirvikoski, Pasi | Winqvist, Robert | Mannermaa, Arto | Kosma, Veli-Matti | Kauppinen, Jaana | Kataja, Vesa | Auvinen, Päivi | Soini, Ylermi | Sironen, Reijo | Bojesen, Stig E. | Dynnes Ørsted, David | Kaur-Knudsen, Diljit | Flyger, Henrik | Nordestgaard, Børge G. | Holland, Helene | Chenevix-Trench, Georgia | Manoukian, Siranoush | Barile, Monica | Radice, Paolo | Hankinson, Susan E. | Hunter, David J. | Tamimi, Rulla | Sangrajrang, Suleeporn | Brennan, Paul | McKay, James | Odefrey, Fabrice | Gaborieau, Valerie | Devilee, Peter | Huijts, P.E.A. | Tollenaar, RAEM. | Seynaeve, C. | Dite, Gillian S. | Apicella, Carmel | Hopper, John L. | Hammet, Fleur | Tsimiklis, Helen | Smith, Letitia D. | Southey, Melissa C. | Humphreys, Manjeet K. | Easton, Douglas | Pharoah, Paul | Sherman, Mark E. | Garcia-Closas, Montserrat
Background
Previous studies have suggested that breast cancer risk factors are associated with estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) expression status of the tumors.
Methods
We pooled tumor marker and epidemiological risk factor data from 35 568 invasive breast cancer case patients from 34 studies participating in the Breast Cancer Association Consortium. Logistic regression models were used in case–case analyses to estimate associations between epidemiological risk factors and tumor subtypes, and case–control analyses to estimate associations between epidemiological risk factors and the risk of developing specific tumor subtypes in 12 population-based studies. All statistical tests were two-sided.
Results
In case–case analyses, of the epidemiological risk factors examined, early age at menarche (≤12 years) was less frequent in case patients with PR− than PR+ tumors (P = .001). Nulliparity (P = 3 × 10−6) and increasing age at first birth (P = 2 × 10−9) were less frequent in ER− than in ER+ tumors. Obesity (body mass index [BMI] ≥ 30 kg/m2) in younger women (≤50 years) was more frequent in ER−/PR− than in ER+/PR+ tumors (P = 1 × 10−7), whereas obesity in older women (>50 years) was less frequent in PR− than in PR+ tumors (P = 6 × 10−4). The triple-negative (ER−/PR−/HER2−) or core basal phenotype (CBP; triple-negative and cytokeratins [CK]5/6+ and/or epidermal growth factor receptor [EGFR]+) accounted for much of the heterogeneity in parity-related variables and BMI in younger women. Case–control analyses showed that nulliparity, increasing age at first birth, and obesity in younger women showed the expected associations with the risk of ER+ or PR+ tumors but not triple-negative (nulliparity vs parity, odds ratio [OR] = 0.94, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.75 to 1.19, P = .61; 5-year increase in age at first full-term birth, OR = 0.95, 95% CI = 0.86 to 1.05, P = .34; obesity in younger women, OR = 1.36, 95% CI = 0.95 to 1.94, P = .09) or CBP tumors.
Conclusions
This study shows that reproductive factors and BMI are most clearly associated with hormone receptor–positive tumors and suggest that triple-negative or CBP tumors may have distinct etiology.
doi:10.1093/jnci/djq526
PMCID: PMC3107570  PMID: 21191117
4.  Prophylactic Mastectomy in BRCA1/2 Mutation Carriers and Women at Risk of Hereditary Breast Cancer: Long-Term Experiences at the Rotterdam Family Cancer Clinic 
Annals of Surgical Oncology  2007;14(12):3335-3344.
Background
BRCA1/2 mutation carriers and women from a hereditary breast(/ovarian) cancer family have a highly increased risk of developing breast cancer (BC). Prophylactic mastectomy (PM) results in the greatest BC risk reduction. Long-term data on the efficacy and sequels of PM are scarce.
Methods
From 358 high-risk women (including 236 BRCA1/2 carriers) undergoing PM between 1994 and 2004, relevant data on the occurrence of BC in relation to PM, complications in relation to breast reconstruction (BR), mutation status, age at PM and preoperative imaging examination results were extracted from the medical records, and analyzed separately for women without (unaffected, n = 177) and with a BC history (affected, n = 181).
Results
No primary BCs occurred after PM (median follow-up 4.5 years). In one previously unaffected woman, metastatic BC was detected almost 4 years after PM (primary BC not found). Median age at PM was younger in unaffected women (P < .001), affected women more frequently were 50% risk carriers (P < .001). Unexpected (pre)malignant changes at PM were found in 3% of the patients (in 5 affected, and 5 unaffected women, respectively). In 49.6% of the women opting for BR one or more complications were registered, totaling 215 complications, leading to 153 surgical interventions (71%). Complications were mainly related to cosmetic outcome (36%) and capsular formation (24%).
Conclusions
The risk of developing a primary BC after PM remains low after longer follow-up. Preoperative imaging and careful histological examination is warranted because of potential unexpected (pre)malignant findings. The high complication rate after breast reconstruction mainly concerns cosmetic issues.
doi:10.1245/s10434-007-9449-x
PMCID: PMC2077910  PMID: 17541692
BRCA1/2; Breast cancer; Mastectomy; Prevention; Complications; Unexpected carcinomas

Results 1-4 (4)