PMCC PMCC

Search tips
Search criteria

Advanced
Results 1-6 (6)
 

Clipboard (0)
None

Select a Filter Below

Journals
Authors
more »
Year of Publication
1.  Can Digital Pathology Result In Cost Savings? A Financial Projection For Digital Pathology Implementation At A Large Integrated Health Care Organization 
Background:
Digital pathology offers potential improvements in workflow and interpretive accuracy. Although currently digital pathology is commonly used for research and education, its clinical use has been limited to niche applications such as frozen sections and remote second opinion consultations. This is mainly due to regulatory hurdles, but also to a dearth of data supporting a positive economic cost-benefit. Large scale adoption of digital pathology and the integration of digital slides into the routine anatomic/surgical pathology “slide less” clinical workflow will occur only if digital pathology will offer a quantifiable benefit, which could come in the form of more efficient and/or higher quality care.
Aim:
As a large academic-based health care organization expecting to adopt digital pathology for primary diagnosis upon its regulatory approval, our institution estimated potential operational cost savings offered by the implementation of an enterprise-wide digital pathology system (DPS).
Methods:
Projected cost savings were calculated for the first 5 years following implementation of a DPS based on operational data collected from the pathology department. Projected savings were based on two factors: (1) Productivity and lab consolidation savings; and (2) avoided treatment costs due to improvements in the accuracy of cancer diagnoses among nonsubspecialty pathologists. Detailed analyses of incremental treatment costs due to interpretive errors, resulting in either a false positive or false negative diagnosis, was performed for melanoma and breast cancer and extrapolated to 10 other common cancers.
Results:
When phased in over 5-years, total cost savings based on anticipated improvements in pathology productivity and histology lab consolidation were estimated at $12.4 million for an institution with 219,000 annual accessions. The main contributing factors to these savings were gains in pathologist clinical full-time equivalent capacity impacted by improved pathologist productivity and workload distribution. Expanding the current localized specialty sign-out model to an enterprise-wide shared general/subspecialist sign-out model could potentially reduce costs of incorrect treatment by $5.4 million. These calculations were based on annual over and under treatment costs for breast cancer and melanoma estimated to be approximately $26,000 and $11,000/case, respectively, and extrapolated to $21,500/case for other cancer types.
Conclusions:
The projected 5-year total cost savings for our large academic-based health care organization upon fully implementing a DPS was approximately $18 million. If the costs of digital pathology acquisition and implementation do not exceed this value, the return on investment becomes attractive to hospital administrators. Furthermore, improved patient outcome enabled by this technology strengthens the argument supporting adoption of an enterprise-wide DPS.
doi:10.4103/2153-3539.139714
PMCID: PMC4168664  PMID: 25250191
Anatomic pathology; cost; cost analysis; digital pathology; productivity; whole slide imaging
2.  Relationship between magnification and resolution in digital pathology systems 
Many pathology laboratories are implementing digital pathology systems. The image resolution and scanning (digitization) magnification can vary greatly between these digital pathology systems. In addition, when digital images are compared with viewing images using a microscope, the cellular features can vary in size. This article highlights differences in magnification and resolution between the conventional microscopes and the digital pathology systems. As more pathologists adopt digital pathology, it is important that they understand these differences and how they ultimately translate into what the pathologist can see and how this may impact their overall viewing experience.
doi:10.4103/2153-3539.116866
PMCID: PMC3779393  PMID: 24083056
Digital; magnification; pathology; resolution; whole slide image
3.  The accuracy of dynamic predictive autofocusing for whole slide imaging 
Context:
Whole slide imaging (WSI) for digital pathology involves the rapid automated acquisition of multiple high-power fields from a microscope slide containing a tissue specimen. Capturing each field in the correct focal plane is essential to create high-quality digital images. Others have described a novel focusing method which reduces the number of focal planes required to generate accurate focus. However, this method was not applied dynamically in an automated WSI system under continuous motion.
Aims:
This report measures the accuracy of this method when applied in a rapid continuous scan mode using a dual sensor WSI system with interleaved acquisition of images.
Methods:
We acquired over 400 tiles in a “stop and go” scan mode, surveying the entire z depth in each tile and used this as ground truth. We compared this ground truth focal height to the focal height determined using a rapid 3-point focus algorithm applied dynamically in a continuous scanning mode.
Results:
Our data showed the average focal height error of 0.30 (±0.27) μm compared to ground truth, which is well within the system's depth of field. On a tile by tile assessment, approximately 95% of the tiles were within the system's depth of field. Further, this method was six times faster than acquiring tiles compared to the same method in a non-continuous scan mode.
Conclusions:
The data indicates that the method employed can yield a significant improvement in scan speed while maintaining highly accurate autofocusing.
doi:10.4103/2153-3539.84231
PMCID: PMC3169924  PMID: 21969919
Autofocus; digital pathology; whole slide imaging
4.  Autofocus methods of whole slide imaging systems and the introduction of a second-generation independent dual sensor scanning method 
Accurate focusing is a critical challenge of whole slide imaging, primarily due to inherent tissue topography variability. Traditional line scanning and tile-based scanning systems are limited in their ability to acquire a high degree of focus points while still maintaining high throughput. This review examines limitations with first-generation whole slide scanning systems and explores a novel approach that employs continuous autofocus, referred to as independent dual sensor scanning. This “second-generation” concept decouples image acquisition from focusing, allowing for rapid scanning while maintaining continuous accurate focus. The technical concepts, merits, and limitations of this method are explained and compared to that of a traditional whole slide scanning system.
doi:10.4103/2153-3539.86282
PMCID: PMC3205523  PMID: 22059145
Autofocus; digital pathology; whole slide imaging
5.  Impact of standalone and embedded telephone triage systems on after hours primary medical care service utilisation and mix in Australia 
Background
The Australian government sponsored five local trials aimed at addressing problems in after hours (AH) primary medical care (PMC). The study's objective was to determine if the four trials, where telephone triage was the sole innovation, led to a reduction in AH service utilisation and change in service mix towards AH GP clinics. Changes in utilisation and mix of AH GP clinic and home visits, ED and ambulance use were monitored in the trial areas, and in a national sample to adjust for the effects of secular trend. Pre- and post-trial telephone surveys of two separate random samples of approximately 350 AH PMC user households in each area were conducted.
Results
Some types of AH PMC use became more frequent in both of the standalone services using nurse-administered proprietary call centre software, which were aimed at better addressing population need (Statewide call centre; Regional call centre). Service use overall (95%CI: 1.03–1.83) and GP clinic use (95%CI: 1.07–2.00) increased in the metro area of the Statewide call centre and in GP clinic (95%CI: 1.04–2.14) and home visits (95%CI: 1.03–3.91) in the non-metro area of the Regional call centre. Service mix only changed in the non-metro area of the Regional call centre with increased contact in GP home visits (95%CI: 1.02–4.38). Levels of use remained unchanged in both embedded services using other than proprietary software, which were established to support the GP workforce (Deputising service; Local triage centre). Service mix only changed in the Deputising service with a change away from AH GP clinics in both contact (95%CI: 0.39–0.97) and frequency (95% CI: -2.12 – -0.7).
Conclusion
Bearing in mind limitations in estimating AH PMC utilisation levels and mix, it is concluded that the impacts of telephone triage were generally smaller in Australia than reported elsewhere. There were different impacts on levels of service utilisation and service mix in standalone call centres and embedded services. Impacts of telephone triage on service utilisation and mix are influenced by the type of telephone triage offered, the goals of the agency providing the service, as well as local factors. (345 words)
doi:10.1186/1743-8462-2-30
PMCID: PMC1334205  PMID: 16343354

Results 1-6 (6)