PMCC PMCC

Search tips
Search criteria

Advanced
Results 1-25 (70)
 

Clipboard (0)
None

Select a Filter Below

Journals
Year of Publication
more »
1.  Alarm Fatigue Can Decrease the Safety of Dental Office Sedation and Anesthesia 
Anesthesia Progress  2013;60(3):93-94.
doi:10.2344/0003-3006-60.3.93
PMCID: PMC3771202  PMID: 24010985
2.  New FDA Black Box Warning for Codeine: How Will This Affect Dentists? 
Anesthesia Progress  2013;60(2):35-36.
doi:10.2344/0003-3006-60.2.35
PMCID: PMC3683877  PMID: 23763556
3.  Norman Trieger, DMD, MD 1929–2012 
Anesthesia Progress  2013;60(1):1-2.
doi:10.2344/0003-3006-60.1.1
PMCID: PMC3601723
4.  Have You Met Your Production Quota Today? 
Anesthesia Progress  2012;59(4):141-142.
doi:10.2344/0003-3006-59.4.141
PMCID: PMC3522490  PMID: 23241035
5.  Prevention of Fire in the Dental Chair 
Anesthesia Progress  2012;59(3):105-106.
doi:10.2344/0003-3006-59.3.105
PMCID: PMC3468287  PMID: 23050749
6.  What Else Can We Learn from the Anesthesia Specialty Application? 
Anesthesia Progress  2012;59(1):1-2.
doi:10.2344/0003-3006-59.1.1
PMCID: PMC3309295  PMID: 22428967
7.  Improving the Quality and Fairness of Sedation and Anesthesia Evaluations 
Anesthesia Progress  2011;58(4):155-156.
doi:10.2344/0003-3006-58.4.155
PMCID: PMC3237324  PMID: 22168804
8.  The Latest ASA Mandate: CO2 Monitoring For Moderate and Deep Sedation 
Anesthesia Progress  2011;58(3):111-112.
doi:10.2344/0003-3006-58.3.111
PMCID: PMC3167153  PMID: 21882985
9.  The Cost of Learning From Our Mistakes 
Anesthesia Progress  2011;58(2):55-56.
doi:10.2344/0003-3006-58.2.55
PMCID: PMC3198126  PMID: 21679039
10.  The Fallacy of a Lifesaving Sublingual Injection of Flumazenil 
Anesthesia Progress  2011;58(1):1-2.
doi:10.2344/0003-3006-58.1.1
PMCID: PMC3265264  PMID: 21410357
11.  The ADA's New Emergency Airway Course For Sedationists 
Anesthesia Progress  2010;57(4):137-138.
doi:10.2344/0003-3006-57.4.137
PMCID: PMC3006660  PMID: 21174566
12.  Why Are There So Many Drug Shortages 
Anesthesia Progress  2010;57(3):89-90.
PMCID: PMC3315272  PMID: 20843222
13.  Why Is Physical Restraint Still Acceptable for Dentistry? 
Anesthesia Progress  2010;57(2):43-44.
doi:10.2344/0003-3006-57.2.43
PMCID: PMC2886916  PMID: 20553133
14.  What Can We Learn From the H1N1 Flu Epidemic? 
Anesthesia Progress  2010;57(1):1-2.
doi:10.2344/0003-3006-57.1.1
PMCID: PMC2844232  PMID: 20331332
15.  Who Should Have Access to the Controlled Substances in Your Office 
Anesthesia Progress  2009;56(4):113-114.
doi:10.2344/0003-3006-56.4.113
PMCID: PMC2796379  PMID: 20020790
16.  CAN CONTINUING EDUCATION EVER BE HARMFUL? 
Anesthesia Progress  2009;56(3):73-74.
doi:10.2344/0003-3006-56.3.73
PMCID: PMC2749582  PMID: 19769419
17.  BEAUTIFUL AUSTRALIAN GOLD COAST TO HOST 2009 IFDAS MEETING 
Anesthesia Progress  2009;56(2):35.
doi:10.2344/0003-3006-56.2.35
PMCID: PMC2699689
18.  What is the Standard of Care for Anesthesia? Who Determines it 
Anesthesia Progress  2009;56(1):1-2.
doi:10.2344/0003-3006-56.1.1
PMCID: PMC2662505  PMID: 19562885
19.  IS YOUR PREANESTHETIC MEDICAL HISTORY FORM STATE-OF-THE-ART 
Anesthesia Progress  2008;55(4):107-108.
doi:10.2344/0003-3006-55.4.107
PMCID: PMC2614647  PMID: 19108593
20.  New Drugs on the Horizon May Improve the Quality and Safety of Anesthesia 
Anesthesia Progress  2008;55(2):27-28.
doi:10.2344/0003-3006(2008)55[27:NDOTHM]2.0.CO;2
PMCID: PMC2424012  PMID: 18547149
21.  Heart Rate Effects of Intraosseous Injections Using Slow and Fast Rates of Anesthetic Solution Deposition 
Anesthesia Progress  2008;55(1):9-15.
The authors, using a crossover design, randomly administered, in a single-blind manner, 3 primary intraosseous injections to 61 subjects using: the Wand local anesthetic system at a deposition rate of 45 seconds (fast injection); the Wand local anesthetic system at a deposition rate of 4 minutes and 45 seconds (slow injection); a conventional syringe injection at a deposition rate of 4 minutes and 45 seconds (slow injection), in 3 separate appointments spaced at least 3 weeks apart. A pulse oximeter measured heart rate (pulse). The results demonstrated the mean maximum heart rate was statistically higher with the fast intraosseous injection (average 21 to 28 beats/min increase) than either of the 2 slow intraosseous injections (average 10 to 12 beats/min increase). There was no statistically significant difference between the 2 slow injections. We concluded that an intraosseous injection of 1.4 mL of 2% lidocaine with 1 : 100,000 epinephrine with the Wand at a 45-second rate of anesthetic deposition resulted in a significantly higher heart rate when compared with a 4-minute and 45-second anesthetic solution deposition using either the Wand or traditional syringe.
doi:10.2344/0003-3006(2008)55[9:HREOII]2.0.CO;2
PMCID: PMC2268887  PMID: 18327970
Intraosseous; Heart rate; Slow and fast injections
22.  Ada's Sedation and Anesthesia Guidelines Pass: Will They Be Universally Accepted 
Anesthesia Progress  2008;55(1):1.
doi:10.2344/0003-3006(2008)55[1:ASAAGP]2.0.CO;2
PMCID: PMC2268884  PMID: 18327968
23.  CAUTION: MAINTAIN ANTI-PLATELET THERAPY IN PATIENTS WITH CORONARY ARTERY STENTS 
Anesthesia Progress  2007;54(4):161-162.
doi:10.2344/0003-3006(2007)54[161:CMATIP]2.0.CO;2
PMCID: PMC2213246  PMID: 18085836
24.  ADA SEDATION-ANESTHESIA GUIDELINES REVISIONS DESERVE OUR SUPPORT 
Anesthesia Progress  2007;54(3):99.
doi:10.2344/0003-3006(2007)54[99:ASGRDO]2.0.CO;2
PMCID: PMC1993869  PMID: 17900214
25.  Rejection Severity Directly Correlates With Myocyte Apoptosis in Pig-to-Baboon Cardiac Xenotransplantation 
Background
The process by which cardiac myocytes die during xenograft rejection is incompletely understood. The presence of cardiac myocyte apoptosis in discordant xenotransplant models has been noted, yet no investigators have examined whether a relationship between myocyte apoptosis and rejection severity exists. Thus, we chose to further investigate this observation.
Methods
Eight explanted pig-to-baboon cardiac grafts with varying severities of rejection, as determined by hematoxylin and eosin histology, were examined for apoptosis by transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and TUNEL (terminal deoxynucleotide transferase-mediated digoxigenin-dUTP nick-end labeling) immunohistochemistry. In addition, Western blot analysis for the cleavage of the apoptosis regulatory proteins pro-caspase 8 and 3 was performed.
Results
Transmission electron microscopy revealed that a severely rejected graft displayed widespread condensation of nuclear chromatin, which is a characteristic morphologic feature of apoptosis. TUNEL staining verified this observation and allowed for the quantification of myocyte apoptosis in each graft. Subsequent linear regression analysis of the extent of myocyte apoptosis and rejection severity revealed a direct correlation (R2 = 0.757, p = 0.005). In addition, Western blot analysis demonstrated that myocyte apoptosis involves the cleavage of pro-caspase 8 and 3.
Conclusions
Myocyte death in rejecting pig-to-baboon cardiac xenografts occurs through an apoptotic pathway and directly correlates with the severity of graft rejection. Further studies aimed at elucidating the apoptotic stimulus are therefore warranted. Moreover, our data suggest that antiapoptotic strategies may be of benefit in the treatment of xenograft rejection.
doi:10.1016/j.healun.2004.05.017
PMCID: PMC1282520  PMID: 15982611

Results 1-25 (70)