PMCC PMCC

Search tips
Search criteria

Advanced
Results 1-2 (2)
 

Clipboard (0)
None

Select a Filter Below

Journals
Authors
Year of Publication
Document Types
1.  JPEG2000 Still Image Coding Quality 
Journal of Digital Imaging  2013;26(5):866-874.
This work demonstrates the image qualities between two popular JPEG2000 programs. Two medical image compression algorithms are both coded using JPEG2000, but they are different regarding the interface, convenience, speed of computation, and their characteristic options influenced by the encoder, quantization, tiling, etc. The differences in image quality and compression ratio are also affected by the modality and compression algorithm implementation. Do they provide the same quality? The qualities of compressed medical images from two image compression programs named Apollo and JJ2000 were evaluated extensively using objective metrics. These algorithms were applied to three medical image modalities at various compression ratios ranging from 10:1 to 100:1. Following that, the quality of the reconstructed images was evaluated using five objective metrics. The Spearman rank correlation coefficients were measured under every metric in the two programs. We found that JJ2000 and Apollo exhibited indistinguishable image quality for all images evaluated using the above five metrics (r > 0.98, p < 0.001). It can be concluded that the image quality of the JJ2000 and Apollo algorithms is statistically equivalent for medical image compression.
doi:10.1007/s10278-013-9603-x
PMCID: PMC3782606  PMID: 23589187
Image compression; JPEG2000; Image quality
2.  A Novel Medical Image Quality Index 
Journal of Digital Imaging  2010;24(5):874-882.
A novel medical image quality index using grey relational coefficient calculation is proposed in this study. Three medical modalities, DR, CT and MRI, using 30 or 60 images with a total of 120 images used for experimentation. These images were first compressed at ten different compression ratios (10 ∼ 100) using a medical image compression algorithm named JJ2000. Following that, the quality of the reconstructed images was evaluated using the grey relational coefficient calculation. The results were shown consistent with popular objective quality metrics. The impact of different image aspects on four grey relational coefficient methods were further tested. The results showed that these grey relational coefficients have different slopes but very high consistency for various image areas. Nagai’s grey relational coefficient was chosen in this study because of higher calculation speed and sensitivity. A comparison was also made between this method and other windows-based objective metrics for various window sizes. Studies found that the grey relational coefficient results are less sensitive to window size changes. The performance of this index is better than some windows-based objective metrics and can be used as an image quality index.
doi:10.1007/s10278-010-9353-y
PMCID: PMC3180531  PMID: 21104000
Image compression; Image quality analysis; JPEG2000

Results 1-2 (2)