Rochelle Walensky and colleagues use a model-based analysis to examine which of
the 2010 WHO antiretroviral therapy guidelines should be implemented first in
resource-limited settings by ranking them according to survival,
cost-effectiveness, and equity.
Background
The new 2010 World Health Organization (WHO) HIV treatment guidelines
recommend earlier antiretroviral therapy (ART) initiation (CD4<350
cells/µl instead of CD4<200 cells/µl), multiple
sequential ART regimens, and replacement of first-line stavudine with
tenofovir. This paper considers what to do first in resource-limited
settings where immediate implementation of all of the WHO recommendations is
not feasible.
Methods and Findings
We use a mathematical model and local input data to project clinical and
economic outcomes in a South African HIV-infected cohort (mean
age = 32.8 y, mean
CD4 = 375/µl). For the reference
strategy, we assume that all patients initiate stavudine-based ART with WHO
stage III/IV disease and receive one line of ART (stavudine/WHO/one-line).
We rank—in survival, cost-effectiveness, and equity
terms—all 12 possible combinations of the following: (1) stavudine
replacement with tenofovir, (2) ART initiation (by WHO stage, CD4<200
cells/µl, or CD4<350 cells/µl), and (3) one or
two regimens, or lines, of available ART. Projected life expectancy for the
reference strategy is 99.0 mo. Considering each of the guideline components
separately, 5-y survival is maximized with ART initiation at CD4<350
cells/µl (stavudine/<350/µl/one-line,
87% survival) compared with stavudine/WHO/two-lines
(66%) and tenofovir/WHO/one-line (66%). The greatest
life expectancies are achieved via the following stepwise programmatic
additions: stavudine/<350/µl/one-line (124.3 mo),
stavudine/<350/µl/two-lines (177.6 mo), and
tenofovir/<350/µl/two-lines (193.6 mo). Three program
combinations are economically efficient:
stavudine/<350/µl/one-line (cost-effectiveness ratio,
US$610/years of life saved [YLS]),
tenofovir/<350/µl/one-line (US$1,140/YLS), and
tenofovir/<350/µl/two-lines (US$2,370/YLS).
Conclusions
In settings where immediate implementation of all of the new WHO treatment
guidelines is not feasible, ART initiation at CD4<350
cells/µl provides the greatest short- and long-term survival
advantage and is highly cost-effective.
Please see later in the article for the Editors' Summary
Editors' Summary
Background
Since 1981, acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) has killed more than 25
million people, and about 33 million people (30 million of them in low- and
middle-income countries) are now infected with the human immunodeficiency
virus (HIV), which causes AIDS. HIV destroys immune system cells (including
CD4 cells, a type of lymphocyte), leaving infected individuals susceptible
to other infections (so-called opportunistic infections). Early in the AIDS
epidemic, most people with HIV died within 10 years of infection. Then, in
1996, highly active antiretroviral therapy (ART)—a combination of
several powerful antiretroviral drugs—was developed. Now, in
resource-rich countries, clinicians care for people with HIV by prescribing
ART regimens tailored to each individual's needs. They also
regularly measure the amount of virus in their patients' blood,
test for antiretroviral-resistant viruses, and monitor the health of their
patients' immune systems through regular CD4 cell counts. As a
result, the life expectancy of patients with HIV in developed countries has
dramatically improved.
Why Was This Study Done?
Initially, resource-limited countries could not afford to provide ART for
their populations, and the life expectancy of HIV-positive people remained
low. Now, through the concerted efforts of governments, the World Health
Organization (WHO), and other international agencies, more than a third of
the people in low- and middle-income countries who need ART are receiving
it. However, many without access are still in need of ART, and ART programs
in developing countries follow a public-health approach rather than an
individualized approach. That is, drug regimens, clinical decision-making,
and disease monitoring are all standardized and follow recommendations in
the 2006 WHO ART guidelines. This year (2010), these guidelines were
revised. The guidelines now recommend the following: earlier ART
initiation—when the CD4 count falls below 350/µl of
blood, instead of below 200/µl as in the 2006 guidelines; the
provision of sequential ART regimens instead of a single regimen; and the
replacement of the antiretroviral drug stavudine with tenofovir, a less
toxic but more expensive drug, in first-line ART regimens. However, many
resource-limited countries are still struggling to implement the 2006
guidelines, so which of these new recommendations should be prioritized?
Here, the researchers use a mathematical model to address this question.
What Did the Researchers Do and Find?
The Cost Effectiveness of AIDS Complications (CEPAC)–International
model simulates the natural history and treatment of HIV disease. The
researchers entered South African clinical and cost data for HIV treatment
into this model and then used it to project survival and costs in a
hypothetical group of South African HIV-positive patients under alternative
guideline prioritization scenarios. The reference strategy for the
simulations (denoted as “stavudine/WHO/one-line”)
assumed that patients (with a mean CD4 count of 375/µl) began a
single stavudine-based ART regimen when they developed WHO stage III/IV HIV
disease (i.e., when patients develop multiple opportunistic infections such
as tuberculosis and pneumonia). When the new guideline recommendations were
considered separately, ART initiation at CD4<350/µl
(stavudine/<350/µl/one-line) maximized five-year survival.
Stepwise adjustment from the reference strategy (which had a life expectancy
99.0 months) through strategies of
stavudine/<350/µl/one-line (a projected life expectancy of
124.3 months), stavudine/<350/µl/two-lines (177.6 months),
and tenofovir/<350/µl/two-lines (193.6 months) produced the
greatest improvements in life expectancy. Finally, strategies of
stavudine/<350/µl/one-line,
tenofovir/<350/µl/one-line, and
tenofovir/<350µl/two-lines produced incremental
cost-effectiveness ratios of US$610, US$1,140, and
US$2,370 per year of life saved, respectively.
What Do These Findings Mean?
As with all mathematical models, the accuracy of these findings are dependent
on the assumptions included in the model and on the data populating it.
Nevertheless, these findings suggest that, where resources are limited and
immediate implementation of all the new WHO recommendations is impossible,
ART initiation at a CD4 count of less than 350/µl would provide
the greatest survival advantage and would be very cost-effective. In
countries that are already initiating ART at this threshold and that have
access to CD4 monitoring, a switch from stavudine to tenofovir would further
increase survival and would also be cost-effective. Finally, although access
to second-line ART regimen would provide more clinical benefits than access
to tenofovir, the cost of this change in strategy would be substantially
greater. Importantly, these findings should help to avoid the complete
dismissal of the revised WHO guidelines on the basis of cost and should help
policy makers adjust their ART program strategies to maximize their clinical
benefits and cost effectiveness.
Additional Information
Please access these Web sites via the online version of this summary at
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000382.
Information is available from the US National Institute of Allergy
and Infectious Diseases on HIV infection and AIDS
HIV InSite has comprehensive information on all
aspects of HIV/AIDS
Information is available from Avert, an
international AIDS charity, on many aspects of HIV/AIDS, including
information on HIV/AIDS
in South Africa and on HIV/AIDS treatment and care (in English and
Spanish)
WHO provides information about universal access to AIDS treatment (in English,
French, and Spanish); its 2010 ART guidelines can be downloaded
More information on the CEPAC model is available