Search tips
Search criteria

Results 1-2 (2)

Clipboard (0)

Select a Filter Below

more »
Year of Publication
Document Types
author:("weigand, Tina")
1.  Too Many Blood Donors – Response Bias in the Swiss Health Survey 2012 
Data on blood donor status obtained from general surveys and health interview surveys have been widely used. However, the integrity of data on self-reported blood donor status from surveys may be threatened by sampling and non-sampling error. Our study aimed to compare self-reported blood donors (including one-time as well as regular donors) from the Swiss Health Survey 2012 (SHS) with register-based blood donors recorded by blood establishments and evaluate the direction and magnitude of bias in the SHS.
We compared population-weighted SHS point estimates of the number of blood donors with their corresponding 95% confidence intervals to the respective figures from blood donor registries (birth cohorts 1978-1993) and estimates of donors based on period donor tables derived from blood donor registries (birth cohorts 1920-1993).
In the birth cohorts 1978-1993, the SHS-predicted number of donors was 1.8 times higher than the respective number of donors based on registry data. Adjusting for foreign and naturalized Swiss nationals that immigrated after their 18th birthday, the SHS overall predicted number of donors was 1.6 times higher. Similarly, SHS estimates for the 1920-1993 birth cohorts were 2.4 and 2.1 times higher as compared to register-based estimates. Generally, the differences between SHS and register-based donors were more pronounced in men than in women.
Self-reported blood donor status in the SHS is biased. Estimates of blood donors are substantially higher than respective estimates based on blood donor registries.
PMCID: PMC5159730  PMID: 27994526
Blood donation; Donors; Self-report; Response bias; Blood donor registry; Health survey
2.  Prospective, Paired Crossover Comparison of the in vitro Quality of Red Blood Cells Collected by the Automate for Blood Collection Device or by a Conventional Method 
The prevention of the citrate shock should improve the quality of red blood cells (RBCs). We compared a conventional whole blood donation method (CONV) with a ‘Automate for Blood Collection’ (ABC), enabling a metered addition of anticoagulant and hence a correct and constant RBC-to-anticoagulant ratio throughout donation. We evaluated the performance of the ABC device and the storage quality of RBC units.
Material and Methods
The study was designed as prospective, paired crossover study with two groups of 20 donors donating first with the ABC or CONV and switching to the alternative method after 12 weeks. We measured the processing data of donations and the storage quality of RBCs on days 1, 28, and 42.
ABC whole blood donations showed a slightly higher volume before and after filtration. ABC-derived RBC units revealed higher values for haematocrit, mean cellular volume, potassium and lower values for mean corpuscular haemoglobin concentration and sodium until day 42. They further showed faster glucose consumption and lactate production until day 28.
The ABC device is suitable for whole blood collection. The quality of the obtained RBCs is comparable to that of CONV. Avoiding the citrate shock by the described method did not improve the investigated RBC storage quality parameters.
PMCID: PMC2941835  PMID: 20877668
Whole blood donation; Citrate shock; Red blood cell storage quality

Results 1-2 (2)