PMCC PMCC

Search tips
Search criteria

Advanced
Results 1-3 (3)
 

Clipboard (0)
None

Select a Filter Below

Journals
Authors
more »
Year of Publication
Document Types
1.  Report on the sixth blind test of organic crystal structure prediction methods 
Reilly, Anthony M. | Cooper, Richard I. | Adjiman, Claire S. | Bhattacharya, Saswata | Boese, A. Daniel | Brandenburg, Jan Gerit | Bygrave, Peter J. | Bylsma, Rita | Campbell, Josh E. | Car, Roberto | Case, David H. | Chadha, Renu | Cole, Jason C. | Cosburn, Katherine | Cuppen, Herma M. | Curtis, Farren | Day, Graeme M. | DiStasio Jr, Robert A. | Dzyabchenko, Alexander | van Eijck, Bouke P. | Elking, Dennis M. | van den Ende, Joost A. | Facelli, Julio C. | Ferraro, Marta B. | Fusti-Molnar, Laszlo | Gatsiou, Christina-Anna | Gee, Thomas S. | de Gelder, René | Ghiringhelli, Luca M. | Goto, Hitoshi | Grimme, Stefan | Guo, Rui | Hofmann, Detlef W. M. | Hoja, Johannes | Hylton, Rebecca K. | Iuzzolino, Luca | Jankiewicz, Wojciech | de Jong, Daniël T. | Kendrick, John | de Klerk, Niek J. J. | Ko, Hsin-Yu | Kuleshova, Liudmila N. | Li, Xiayue | Lohani, Sanjaya | Leusen, Frank J. J. | Lund, Albert M. | Lv, Jian | Ma, Yanming | Marom, Noa | Masunov, Artëm E. | McCabe, Patrick | McMahon, David P. | Meekes, Hugo | Metz, Michael P. | Misquitta, Alston J. | Mohamed, Sharmarke | Monserrat, Bartomeu | Needs, Richard J. | Neumann, Marcus A. | Nyman, Jonas | Obata, Shigeaki | Oberhofer, Harald | Oganov, Artem R. | Orendt, Anita M. | Pagola, Gabriel I. | Pantelides, Constantinos C. | Pickard, Chris J. | Podeszwa, Rafal | Price, Louise S. | Price, Sarah L. | Pulido, Angeles | Read, Murray G. | Reuter, Karsten | Schneider, Elia | Schober, Christoph | Shields, Gregory P. | Singh, Pawanpreet | Sugden, Isaac J. | Szalewicz, Krzysztof | Taylor, Christopher R. | Tkatchenko, Alexandre | Tuckerman, Mark E. | Vacarro, Francesca | Vasileiadis, Manolis | Vazquez-Mayagoitia, Alvaro | Vogt, Leslie | Wang, Yanchao | Watson, Rona E. | de Wijs, Gilles A. | Yang, Jack | Zhu, Qiang | Groom, Colin R.
The results of the sixth blind test of organic crystal structure prediction methods are presented and discussed, highlighting progress for salts, hydrates and bulky flexible molecules, as well as on-going challenges.
The sixth blind test of organic crystal structure prediction (CSP) methods has been held, with five target systems: a small nearly rigid molecule, a polymorphic former drug candidate, a chloride salt hydrate, a co-crystal and a bulky flexible molecule. This blind test has seen substantial growth in the number of participants, with the broad range of prediction methods giving a unique insight into the state of the art in the field. Significant progress has been seen in treating flexible molecules, usage of hierarchical approaches to ranking structures, the application of density-functional approximations, and the establishment of new workflows and ‘best practices’ for performing CSP calculations. All of the targets, apart from a single potentially disordered Z′ = 2 polymorph of the drug candidate, were predicted by at least one submission. Despite many remaining challenges, it is clear that CSP methods are becoming more applicable to a wider range of real systems, including salts, hydrates and larger flexible molecules. The results also highlight the potential for CSP calculations to complement and augment experimental studies of organic solid forms.
doi:10.1107/S2052520616007447
PMCID: PMC4971545  PMID: 27484368
crystal structure prediction; polymorphism; lattice energies; Cambridge Structural Database
2.  Towards crystal structure prediction of complex organic compounds – a report on the fifth blind test 
Following on from the success of the previous crystal structure prediction blind tests (CSP1999, CSP2001, CSP2004 and CSP2007), a fifth such collaborative project (CSP2010) was organized at the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre. A range of methodologies was used by the participating groups in order to evaluate the ability of the current computational methods to predict the crystal structures of the six organic molecules chosen as targets for this blind test. The first four targets, two rigid molecules, one semi-flexible molecule and a 1:1 salt, matched the criteria for the targets from CSP2007, while the last two targets belonged to two new challenging categories – a larger, much more flexible molecule and a hydrate with more than one polymorph. Each group submitted three predictions for each target it attempted. There was at least one successful prediction for each target, and two groups were able to successfully predict the structure of the large flexible molecule as their first place submission. The results show that while not as many groups successfully predicted the structures of the three smallest molecules as in CSP2007, there is now evidence that methodologies such as dispersion-corrected density functional theory (DFT-D) are able to reliably do so. The results also highlight the many challenges posed by more complex systems and show that there are still issues to be overcome.
doi:10.1107/S0108768111042868
PMCID: PMC3222142  PMID: 22101543
3.  Towards crystal structure prediction of complex organic compounds – a report on the fifth blind test 
The results of the fifth blind test of crystal structure prediction, which show important success with more challenging large and flexible molecules, are presented and discussed.
Following on from the success of the previous crystal structure prediction blind tests (CSP1999, CSP2001, CSP2004 and CSP2007), a fifth such collaborative project (CSP2010) was organized at the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre. A range of methodologies was used by the participating groups in order to evaluate the ability of the current computational methods to predict the crystal structures of the six organic molecules chosen as targets for this blind test. The first four targets, two rigid molecules, one semi-flexible molecule and a 1:1 salt, matched the criteria for the targets from CSP2007, while the last two targets belonged to two new challenging categories – a larger, much more flexible molecule and a hydrate with more than one polymorph. Each group submitted three predictions for each target it attempted. There was at least one successful prediction for each target, and two groups were able to successfully predict the structure of the large flexible molecule as their first place submission. The results show that while not as many groups successfully predicted the structures of the three smallest molecules as in CSP2007, there is now evidence that methodologies such as dispersion-corrected density functional theory (DFT-D) are able to reliably do so. The results also highlight the many challenges posed by more complex systems and show that there are still issues to be overcome.
doi:10.1107/S0108768111042868
PMCID: PMC3222142  PMID: 22101543
prediction; blind test; polymorph; crystal structure prediction

Results 1-3 (3)