Purpose
To determine if genotype is associated with rate of growth of geographic atrophy (GA) in eyes with age-related macular degeneration (AMD).
Design
Prospective analysis of participants in a randomized controlled clinical trial.
Participants
114 eyes of 114 participants in the Age-Related Eye Disease Study (AREDS).
Methods
Fundus photographs from AREDS participants with GA from whom a DNA specimen had been obtained and serial photographs had been taken over a minimum of 2 years were evaluated for progression as determined by change in cumulative area of GA. All fundus photographs were scanned, digitized, and centrally graded longitudinally for area of GA. The relationship of GA progression with previously identified genetic variants associated with AMD was assessed.
Main Outcome Measures
Genotype frequencies and change in cumulative area of GA.
Results
The mean growth rate of geographic atrophy for the 114 eyes was 1.79 mm2/year (range= 0.17–4.76 mm2/year). No association between growth rate and genotype was present for variants in the CFH, C2, C3, APOE, and TLR3genes. For the single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) rs10490924 in LOC387715/ARMS2, there was a significant association of GA growth rate, both adjusted and unadjusted for initial lesion size, with the homozygous risk genotype as compared to the homozygous non-risk genotype (unadjusted p-value = 0.002; Bonferroni corrected p-value = 0.014) and for allelic association(Bonferroni corrected p-value = 0.011). Analyses of other measures of geographic atrophy progression (progression to central GA from extrafoveal GA and development of bilateral GA in those initially with unilateral GA) showed no statistically significant association between progression and the LOC387715/ARMS2/HTRA1 genotype.
Conclusion
GA growth rates calculated from digitized serial fundus photographs showed no association with variants in the CFH, C2, C3, APOE, and TLR3 genes. There was a nominally statistically significant association with the LOC387715/ARMS2/HTRA1 genotype, although this finding was not supported by analyses of secondary measures of GA progression. Replication in other populations would be needed to establish the existence of an association.