PMCC PMCC

Search tips
Search criteria

Advanced
Results 1-7 (7)
 

Clipboard (0)
None

Select a Filter Below

Journals
Year of Publication
Document Types
1.  Volumetric PET/CT parameters predict local response of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma to chemoradiotherapy 
Cancer Medicine  2014;3(5):1368-1376.
It is not well established whether pretreatment 18F-FDG PET/CT can predict local response of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) to chemoradiotherapy (CRT). We examined 118 patients: 11 with nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC), 30 with oropharyngeal cancer (OPC), and 77 with laryngohypopharyngeal cancer (LHC) who had completed CRT. PET/CT parameters of primary tumor, including metabolic tumor volume (MTV), total lesion glycolysis (TLG), and maximum and mean standardized uptake value (SUVmax and SUVmean), were correlated with local response, according to primary site and human papillomavirus (HPV) status. Receiver-operating characteristic analyses were made to access predictive values of the PET/CT parameters, while logistic regression analyses were used to identify independent predictors. Area under the curve (AUC) of the PET/CT parameters ranged from 0.53 to 0.63 in NPC and from 0.50 to 0.54 in OPC. HPV-negative OPC showed AUC ranging from 0.51 to 0.58, while all of HPV-positive OPCs showed complete response. In contrast, AUC ranged from 0.71 to 0.90 in LHC. Moreover, AUCs of MTV and TLG were significantly higher than those of SUVmax and SUVmean (P < 0.01). After multivariate analysis, high MTV >25.0 mL and high TLG >144.8 g remained as independent, significant predictors of incomplete response compared with low MTV (odds ratio [OR], 13.4; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.5–72.9; P = 0.003) and low TLG (OR, 12.8; 95% CI, 2.4–67.9; P = 0.003), respectively. In conclusion, predictive efficacy of pretreatment 18F-FDG PET/CT varies with different primary sites and chosen parameters. Local response of LHC is highly predictable by volume-based PET/CT parameters.
doi:10.1002/cam4.295
PMCID: PMC4302687  PMID: 25045041
Chemoradiotherapy; head and neck squamous cell carcinoma; local response; metabolic tumor volume; total lesion glycolysis
2.  Dosimetry analyses comparing high-dose-rate brachytherapy, administered as monotherapy for localized prostate cancer, with stereotactic body radiation therapy simulated using CyberKnife 
Journal of Radiation Research  2014;55(6):1114-1121.
The purpose of this study was to perform dosimetry analyses comparing high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) with simulated stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). We selected six consecutive patients treated with HDR-BT monotherapy in 2010, and a CyberKnife SBRT plan was simulated for each patient using computed tomography images and the contouring set used in the HDR-BT plan for the actual treatment, but adding appropriate planning target volume (PTV) margins for SBRT. Then, dosimetric profiles for PTVs of the rectum, bladder and urethra were compared between the two modalities. The SBRT plan was more homogenous and provided lower dose concentration but better coverage for the PTV. The maximum doses in the rectum were higher in the HDR-BT plans. However, the HDR-BT plan provided a sharper dose fall-off around the PTV, resulting in a significant and considerable difference in volume sparing of the rectum with the appropriate PTV margins added for SBRT. While the rectum D5cm3 for HDR-BT and SBRT was 30.7 and 38.3 Gy (P < 0.01) and V40 was 16.3 and 20.8 cm3 (P < 0.01), respectively, SBRT was significantly superior in almost all dosimetric profiles for the bladder and urethra. These results suggest that SBRT as an alternative to HDR-BT in hypofractionated radiotherapy for prostate cancer might have an advantage for bladder and urethra dose sparing, but for the rectum only when proper PTV margins for SBRT are adopted.
doi:10.1093/jrr/rru048
PMCID: PMC4229914  PMID: 24957754
prostate cancer; stereotactic body radiotherapy; high-dose-rate brachytherapy; hypofractionation; dosimetry
3.  Differential cellular responses to prolonged low dose rate ionizing radiation in MLH1-proficient and -deficient colorectal cancer HCT116 cells 
Purpose
MLH1 is a key DNA mismatch repair (MMR) protein involved in maintaining genomic stability by participating in the repair of endogenous and exogenous mispairs in the daughter strands during S-phase. Exogenous mispairs can result following treatment with several classes of chemotherapeutic drugs as well as with ionizing radiation (IR). In this study, we investigated the role of the MLH1 protein in determining the cellular and molecular responses to prolonged low dose rate (LDR) IR, which is similar to the clinical use of cancer brachytherapy.
Experimental design
An isogenic pair of MMR+ (MLH1+) and MMR− (MLH1−) human colorectal cancer HCT116 cells were exposed to prolonged LDR-IR (1.3–17cGy/h × 24–96 h). The clonogenic survival and gene mutation rates were examined. Cell cycle distribution was analyzed with flow cytometry. Changes in selected DNA damage repair proteins, DNA damage response proteins and cell death marker proteins were examined with Western blotting.
Results
MLH1+ HCT116 cells showed greater radiosensitivity with enhanced expression of apoptotic and autophagic markers; a reduced HPRT gene mutation rate; and more pronounced cell cycle alterations (increased late S population and a G2/M arrest) following LDR-IR compared to MLH1− HCT116 cells. Importantly, a progressive increase in MLH1 protein levels was found in MLH1+ cells during prolonged LDR-IR, which was temporally correlated with a progressive decrease in Rad51 protein (involved in homologous recombination, HR) levels.
Conclusions
MLH1 status significantly affects cellular responses to prolonged LDR-IR. MLH1 may enhance cell radiosensitivity to prolonged LDR-IR through inhibition of HR (via inhibition of Rad51).
doi:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-09-1698
PMCID: PMC2783277  PMID: 19861440
mismatch repair; low dose rate IR; MLH1; Rad51; late S phase
4.  Essential role of DNA base excision repair on survival in an acidic tumor microenvironment 
Cancer research  2009;69(18):7285-7293.
The base excision repair (BER) pathway is required to repair endogenous and exogenous oxidative DNA damage. Multiple DNA repair pathways have been shown to be down-regulated in the tumor microenvironment, whereas APE1/Ref1, a central protein in BER, is overexpressed in many types of solid tumors. APE1/Ref1 has dual functions, participating both in BER and in redox regulation of oxidized transcription factors. Here, we show that inhibition of the BER pathway in an acidic tumor microenvironment increases oxidative DNA damage temporally related to increased intracellular reactive oxygen species. Unrepaired oxidative DNA damage results in cell cycle arrests and increased DNA double strand breaks, leading to cell death. Therefore, up-regulation of BER in solid cancers may represent an adaptive survival response. Consequently, BER inhibition may confer tumor microenvironment targeted cytotoxicity in human cancers. Our data suggest that BER inhibition is a rational basis for cancer therapy with or without other cytotoxic therapy. Additionally, our results offer insight as to why APE1/Ref1 retains it’s unique dual functionality, both of which counteract environmental oxidative stress.
doi:10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-0624
PMCID: PMC2745500  PMID: 19723658
base excision repair; APE1/Ref1; XRCC1; tumor microenvironment; DNA damage
5.  Radiation Therapy in Addition to Gross Total Resection of Retroperitoneal Sarcoma Results in Prolonged Survival: Results from a Single Institutional Study 
Journal of Oncology  2009;2008:824036.
Purpose. Typical treatment of retroperitoneal sarcomas (RPSs) is surgery with or without radiation therapy for localized disease. With surgery alone, local failure rates are as high as 90%; this led to radiation therapy playing an important role in the treatment of RPSs. Methods. Thirty-one patients with retroperitoneal sarcoma treated with gross total resection and radiation therapy make up this retrospective analysis. Nineteen were treated preoperatively and 12 postoperatively (median dose, 59.4 Gy)—sixteen also received intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT) (median dose, 11 Gy). Patients were followed with stringent regimens, including frequent CT scans of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis. Results. With a median follow-up of 19 months (range 1–66 months), the 2-year overall survival (OS) rate is 70% (median, 52 months). The 2-year locoregional control (LRC) rate is 77% (median, 61.6 months). The 2-year distant disease free survival (DDFS) rate is 70% (median not reached). There were no differences in radiation-related acute and late toxicities among patients treated pre- versus postoperatively, whether with or without IORT. Conclusions. Compared to surgery alone, neoadjuvant or adjuvant radiation therapy offers patients with RPS an excellent chance for long-term LRC, DDS, and OS. The integration of modern treatment planning for external beam radiation therapy and IORT allows for higher doses to be delivered with acceptable toxicities.
doi:10.1155/2008/824036
PMCID: PMC2648636  PMID: 19277103
6.  Adjuvant Therapy for Rectal Cancer 
ABSTRACT
Patients with stage II and III rectal cancer benefit from a multidisciplinary approach to treatment. Studies of postoperative adjuvant therapy consistently demonstrate decreases in locoregional recurrence with the use of radiation therapy. The use of postoperative chemotherapy results in improved disease-free survival and overall survival in certain studies. Preoperative radiation therapy decreases locoregional recurrence and in one study demonstrated an improvement in survival. The addition of chemotherapy to preoperative radiation results in improved locoregional control, but not survival. Preoperative chemoradiation is the standard of care for patients with clinical stage II and III rectal cancer in the United States due to improved local recurrence, acute and late toxicity, and sphincter preservation compared with postoperative chemoradiation. Promising approaches include the incorporation of new chemotherapeutic and biologic agents into chemoradiation and adjuvant chemotherapy regimens; new radiation techniques, such as the use of intraoperative radiation therapy and an accelerated concomitant radiation boost; and gene and protein expression profiling, to better predict response to treatment and prognosis.
doi:10.1055/s-2007-984861
PMCID: PMC2789506  PMID: 20011198
Rectal cancer; radiation; chemotherapy; adjuvant; review
7.  5-iodo-2-pyrimidinone-2′-deoxyribose (IPdR)-mediated cytotoxicity and radiosensitization in U87 human glioblastoma xenografts 
Purpose
5-iodo-2-pyrimidinone-2′-deoxyribose (IPdR) is a novel orally administered (po) prodrug of 5-iododeoxyuridine (IUdR). As po IPdR is being considered for clinical testing as a radiosensitizer in patients with high grade gliomas, we performed this in vivo study of IPdR-mediated cytotoxicity and radiosensitization in a human glioblastoma xenograft model, U87.
Methods and Materials
Groups of 8–9 athymic male nude mice (6–8 weeks old) were implanted with sc U87 xenograft tumors (4 × 106 cells) and then randomized to 10 treatment groups receiving increasing doses of po IPdR (0, 100, 250, 500, and 1000 mg/kg/d) administered once daily (qd) × 14 d with or without radiation therapy (RT) (0 or 2 Gy/d × 4 d) on days 11–14 of IPdR treatment. Systemic toxicity was determined by body weight measurements during and following IPdR treatment. Tumor response was assessed by changes in tumor volumes.
Results
IPdR alone at doses of ≥500 mg/kg/d results in moderate inhibition of tumor growth. The combination of IPdR + RT results in a significant IPdR dose-dependent tumor growth delay with the maximum radiosensitization using ≥500 mg/kg/d. IPdR doses of 500 and 1000 mg/kg/d did result in transient 5–15% body weight loss during treatment.
Conclusions
In U87 human glioblastoma sc xenografts, po IPdR given qd × 14 d and RT given 2 Gy/d × 4 d (days 11–14 of IPdR treatment) results in a significant tumor growth delay in an IPdR dose-dependent pattern. The use of po IPdR + RT holds promise for phase I/II testing in patients with high grade gliomas.
doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.08.004
PMCID: PMC2128756  PMID: 17967315
IpdR; U87 xenografts; radiosensitization

Results 1-7 (7)