PMCC PMCC

Search tips
Search criteria

Advanced
Results 1-15 (15)
 

Clipboard (0)
None

Select a Filter Below

Journals
more »
Year of Publication
Document Types
1.  Overexpression of the Far Upstream Element Binding Protein 1 in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Is Required for Tumor Growth 
Hepatology (Baltimore, Md.)  2009;50(4):1121-1129.
We identified the far upstream element binding protein 1 (FBP1), an activator of transcription of the proto-oncogene c-myc, in a functional yeast survival screen for tumor-related antiapoptotic proteins and demonstrated strong overexpression of FBP1 in human hepato-cellular carcinoma (HCC). Knockdown of the protein in HCC cells resulted in increased sensitivity to apoptotic stimuli, reduced cell proliferation, and impaired tumor formation in a mouse xenograft transplantation model. Interestingly, analysis of gene regulation in these cells revealed that c-myc levels were not influenced by FBP1 in HCC cells. Instead, we identified the cell cycle inhibitor p21 as a direct target gene repressed by FBP1, and in addition, expression levels of the proapoptotic genes tumor necrosis factor α, tumor necrosis factor–related apoptosis-inducing ligand, Noxa, and Bik were elevated in the absence of FBP1.
Conclusion
Our data establish FBP1 as an important oncoprotein overexpressed in HCC that induces tumor propagation through direct or indirect repression of cell cycle inhibitors and proapoptotic target genes.
doi:10.1002/hep.23098
PMCID: PMC3474328  PMID: 19637194
2.  Correction: Teasing Apart Translational and Transcriptional Components of Stochastic Variations in Eukaryotic Gene Expression 
PLoS Computational Biology  2012;8(10):10.1371/annotation/4498943d-525d-4ac1-8375-ae78e67ea0c8.
doi:10.1371/annotation/4498943d-525d-4ac1-8375-ae78e67ea0c8
PMCID: PMC3476851
3.  Teasing Apart Translational and Transcriptional Components of Stochastic Variations in Eukaryotic Gene Expression 
PLoS Computational Biology  2012;8(8):e1002644.
The intrinsic stochasticity of gene expression leads to cell-to-cell variations, noise, in protein abundance. Several processes, including transcription, translation, and degradation of mRNA and proteins, can contribute to these variations. Recent single cell analyses of gene expression in yeast have uncovered a general trend where expression noise scales with protein abundance. This trend is consistent with a stochastic model of gene expression where mRNA copy number follows the random birth and death process. However, some deviations from this basic trend have also been observed, prompting questions about the contribution of gene-specific features to such deviations. For example, recent studies have pointed to the TATA box as a sequence feature that can influence expression noise by facilitating expression bursts. Transcription-originated noise can be potentially further amplified in translation. Therefore, we asked the question of to what extent sequence features known or postulated to accompany translation efficiency can also be associated with increase in noise strength and, on average, how such increase compares to the amplification associated with the TATA box. Untangling different components of expression noise is highly nontrivial, as they may be gene or gene-module specific. In particular, focusing on codon usage as one of the sequence features associated with efficient translation, we found that ribosomal genes display a different relationship between expression noise and codon usage as compared to other genes. Within nonribosomal genes we found that sequence high codon usage is correlated with increased noise relative to the average noise of proteins with the same abundance. Interestingly, by projecting the data on a theoretical model of gene expression, we found that the amplification of noise strength associated with codon usage is comparable to that of the TATA box, suggesting that the effect of translation on noise in eukaryotic gene expression might be more prominent than previously appreciated.
Author Summary
The stochastic nature of gene expression leads to cell-to-cell differences in protein level referred to as noise. Expression noise can be disadvantageous, by affecting the precision of biological functions, but it may also be advantageous by enabling heterogeneous stress-response programs to environmental changes. Therefore various genes and gene groups might display various levels of expression noise. Importantly, gene expression is a multi-step process and the stochasticity of its individual steps, including transcription and translation, contributes to the resulting variability. Recent single cell analyses of gene expression in yeast have confirmed the theoretically predicted general trend where expression noise scales with protein abundance. However, some deviations from this basic trend have also been observed, prompting questions about the contribution of gene-specific features to such deviations. Accounting for noise heterogeneity in different gene groups, we revealed a clear relationship between noise and translation-related genomic features, specifically codon usage and 5′ UTR secondary structure. Our results suggest that the effect of translation on these deviations might be more prominent than previously appreciated, and provide important clues towards understanding expression stochasticity in yeast.
doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002644
PMCID: PMC3431295  PMID: 22956896
4.  Rapid genome-scale mapping of chromatin accessibility in tissue 
Background
The challenge in extracting genome-wide chromatin features from limiting clinical samples poses a significant hurdle in identification of regulatory marks that impact the physiological or pathological state. Current methods that identify nuclease accessible chromatin are reliant on large amounts of purified nuclei as starting material. This complicates analysis of trace clinical tissue samples that are often stored frozen. We have developed an alternative nuclease based procedure to bypass nuclear preparation to interrogate nuclease accessible regions in frozen tissue samples.
Results
Here we introduce a novel technique that specifically identifies Tissue Accessible Chromatin (TACh). The TACh method uses pulverized frozen tissue as starting material and employs one of the two robust endonucleases, Benzonase or Cyansase, which are fully active under a range of stringent conditions such as high levels of detergent and DTT. As a proof of principle we applied TACh to frozen mouse liver tissue. Combined with massive parallel sequencing TACh identifies accessible regions that are associated with euchromatic features and accessibility at transcriptional start sites correlates positively with levels of gene transcription. Accessible chromatin identified by TACh overlaps to a large extend with accessible chromatin identified by DNase I using nuclei purified from freshly isolated liver tissue as starting material. The similarities are most pronounced at highly accessible regions, whereas identification of less accessible regions tends to be more divergence between nucleases. Interestingly, we show that some of the differences between DNase I and Benzonase relate to their intrinsic sequence biases and accordingly accessibility of CpG islands is probed more efficiently using TACh.
Conclusion
The TACh methodology identifies accessible chromatin derived from frozen tissue samples. We propose that this simple, robust approach can be applied across a broad range of clinically relevant samples to allow demarcation of regulatory elements of considerable prognostic significance.
doi:10.1186/1756-8935-5-10
PMCID: PMC3464876  PMID: 22734930
Chromatin accessibility; Tissue; TACh; Benzonase; Cyanase; DNase I
5.  Cooperative Epigenetic Modulation by Cancer Amplicon Genes 
Cancer cell  2010;18(6):590-605.
Chromosome band 9p24 is frequently amplified in primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma (PMBL) and Hodgkin lymphoma (HL). To identify oncogenes in this amplicon, we screened an RNA interference library targeting amplicon genes and thereby identified JAK2 and the histone demethylase JMJD2C as essential genes in these lymphomas. Inhibition of JAK2 and JMJD2C cooperated in killing these lymphomas by decreasing tyrosine 41 phosphorylation and increasing lysine 9 trimethylation of histone H3, promoting heterochromatin formation. MYC, a major target of JAK2-mediated histone phosphorylation, was silenced following JAK2 and JMJD2C inhibition, with a corresponding increase in repressive chromatin. Hence, JAK2 and JMJD2C cooperatively remodel the PMBL and HL epigenome, offering a mechanistic rationale for the development of JAK2 and JMJD2C inhibitors in these diseases.
doi:10.1016/j.ccr.2010.11.013
PMCID: PMC3049192  PMID: 21156283
6.  You Don't Muck with MYC* 
Genes & cancer  2010;1(6):547-554.
MYC homeostasis is critical for major cellular and organismal processes. The physiological and pathologic patterns of c-myc transcription are programmed by a large number of cis-elements and transfactors (RNAs and proteins). These elements and factors receive inputs from a multitude of intracellular and extracellular pathways. Because c-myc regulation has customarily been dissected element by element and factor by factor, it has been difficult to appreciate how the c-myc promoter and regulatory sequences operate as a system. A full accounting of the regulation of c-myc transcription will require an understanding of the dynamic interplay of these factors and elements with one another, with chromatin, and with the changes in DNA structure and topology that are inevitably coupled with gene activity.
doi:10.1177/1947601910377492
PMCID: PMC2946075  PMID: 20882108
c-myc promoter; noise; supercoiling; FUBP
7.  “You Don’t Muck with MYC”* 
Genes & Cancer  2010;1(6):547-554.
MYC homeostasis is critical for major cellular and organismal processes. The physiological and pathologic patterns of c-myc transcription are programmed by a large number of cis-elements and transfactors (RNAs and proteins). These elements and factors receive inputs from a multitude of intracellular and extracellular pathways. Because c-myc regulation has customarily been dissected element by element and factor by factor, it has been difficult to appreciate how the c-myc promoter and regulatory sequences operate as a system. A full accounting of the regulation of c-myc transcription will require an understanding of the dynamic interplay of these factors and elements with one another, with chromatin, and with the changes in DNA structure and topology that are inevitably coupled with gene activity.
doi:10.1177/1947601910377492
PMCID: PMC2946075  PMID: 20882108
c-myc promoter; noise; supercoiling; FUBP
8.  How the c-myc Promoter Works and Why It Sometimes Does Not 
The c-myc promoter is regulated by scores of signals, transcription factors, and chromatin components. The logic integrating these multiple signals remains unexplored. Recent evidence suggests that activated MYC expression is regulated in several phases: 1) conventional transcription factors trigger transcription by the RNA polymerase II (pol II) paused within the proximal promoter region. Concurrently (and probably consequently), newly arrived chromatin-remodeling complexes mobilize a nucleo-some masking the far upstream element (FUSE), 1.7-kb upstream of the P2 start site; 2) binding by FUSE-binding proteins (first FBP3, then FBP); and 3) FBP-interacting repressor (FIR) binds FUSE and returns transcription to basal or steady-state levels. The recruitment and release of the FBPs and FIR is governed by FUSE-DNA conformation, itself controlled by dynamic supercoils propagated behind pol II. The organization and operation of the c-myc promoter make it difficult to inactivate, but sensitive to disturbances (translocations, viral insertions, amplification, and mutation) that disrupt the fine-tuning seen at its normal chromosomal context.
doi:10.1093/jncimonographs/lgn004
PMCID: PMC2683261  PMID: 18648001
9.  Dimerization of FIR upon FUSE DNA binding suggests a mechanism of c-myc inhibition 
The EMBO Journal  2007;27(1):277-289.
c-myc is essential for cell homeostasis and growth but lethal if improperly regulated. Transcription of this oncogene is governed by the counterbalancing forces of two proteins on TFIIH—the FUSE binding protein (FBP) and the FBP-interacting repressor (FIR). FBP and FIR recognize single-stranded DNA upstream of the P1 promoter, known as FUSE, and influence transcription by oppositely regulating TFIIH at the promoter site. Size exclusion chromatography coupled with light scattering reveals that an FIR dimer binds one molecule of single-stranded DNA. The crystal structure confirms that FIR binds FUSE as a dimer, and only the N-terminal RRM domain participates in nucleic acid recognition. Site-directed mutations of conserved residues in the first RRM domain reduce FIR's affinity for FUSE, while analogous mutations in the second RRM domain either destabilize the protein or have no effect on DNA binding. Oppositely oriented DNA on parallel binding sites of the FIR dimer results in spooling of a single strand of bound DNA, and suggests a mechanism for c-myc transcriptional control.
doi:10.1038/sj.emboj.7601936
PMCID: PMC2206118  PMID: 18059478
c-myc; FBP interacting repressor; gene transcription; RRM domain; X-ray crystallography
10.  Cellular mRNA Activates Transcription Elongation by Displacing 7SK RNA 
PLoS ONE  2007;2(10):e1010.
The positive transcription elongation factor P-TEFb is a pivotal regulator of gene expression in higher cells. Originally identified in Drosophila, attention was drawn to human P-TEFb by the discovery of its role as an essential cofactor for HIV-1 transcription. It is recruited to HIV transcription complexes by the viral transactivator Tat, and to cellular transcription complexes by a plethora of transcription factors. P-TEFb activity is negatively regulated by sequestration in a complex with the HEXIM proteins and 7SK RNA. The mechanism of P-TEFb release from the inhibitory complex is not known. We report that P-TEFb-dependent transcription from the HIV promoter can be stimulated by the mRNA encoding HIC, the human I-mfa domain-containing protein. The 3′-untranslated region of HIC mRNA is necessary and sufficient for this action. It forms complexes with P-TEFb and displaces 7SK RNA from the inhibitory complex in cells and cell extracts. A 314-nucleotide sequence near the 3′ end of HIC mRNA has full activity and contains a predicted structure resembling the 3′-terminal hairpin of 7SK that is critical for P-TEFb binding. This represents the first example of a cellular mRNA that can regulate transcription via P-TEFb. Our findings offer a rationale for 7SK being an RNA transcriptional regulator and suggest a practical means for enhancing gene expression.
doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0001010
PMCID: PMC1995758  PMID: 17925858
11.  A Novel Approach for Determining Cancer Genomic Breakpoints in the Presence of Normal DNA 
PLoS ONE  2007;2(4):e380.
CDKN2A (encodes p16INK4A and p14ARF) deletion, which results in both Rb and p53 inactivation, is the most common chromosomal anomaly in human cancers. To precisely map the deletion breakpoints is important to understanding the molecular mechanism of genomic rearrangement and may also be useful for clinical applications. However, current methods for determining the breakpoint are either of low resolution or require the isolation of relatively pure cancer cells, which can be difficult for clinical samples that are typically contaminated with various amounts of normal host cells. To overcome this hurdle, we have developed a novel approach, designated Primer Approximation Multiplex PCR (PAMP), for enriching breakpoint sequences followed by genomic tiling array hybridization to locate the breakpoints. In a series of proof-of-concept experiments, we were able to identify cancer-derived CDKN2A genomic breakpoints when more than 99.9% of wild type genome was present in a model system. This design can be scaled up with bioinformatics support and can be applied to validate other candidate cancer-associated loci that are revealed by other more systemic but lower throughput assays.
doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0000380
PMCID: PMC1847701  PMID: 17440616
12.  FBPs Are Calibrated Molecular Tools To Adjust Gene Expression†  
Molecular and Cellular Biology  2006;26(17):6584-6597.
The three far-upstream element (FUSE) binding protein (FBP) family members have been ascribed different functions in gene regulation. They were therefore examined with various biochemical, molecular biological, and cell biological tests to evaluate whether their sequence differences reflect functional customization or neutral changes at unselected residues. Each FBP displayed a characteristic profile of intrinsic transcription activation and repression, binding with protein partners, and subcellular trafficking. Although some differences, such as weakened FBP3 nuclear localization, were predictable from primary sequence differences, the unexpected failure of FBP3 to bind the FBP-interacting repressor (FIR) was traced to seemingly conservative substitutions within a small patch of an N-terminal α-helix. The transactivation strength and the FIR-binding strength of the FBPs were in the opposite order. Despite their distinguishing features and differential activities, the FBPs traffic to shared subnuclear sites and regulate many common target genes, including c-myc. Though a variety of functions have been attributed to the FBPs, based upon their panel of shared and unique features, we propose that they constitute a molecular regulatory kit that tunes the expression of shared targets through a common mechanism.
doi:10.1128/MCB.00754-06
PMCID: PMC1592819  PMID: 16914741
13.  TFIIH Operates through an Expanded Proximal Promoter To Fine-Tune c-myc Expression 
Molecular and Cellular Biology  2005;25(1):147-161.
A continuous stream of activating and repressing signals is processed by the transcription complex paused at the promoter of the c-myc proto-oncogene. The general transcription factor IIH (TFIIH) is held at promoters prior to promoter escape and so is well situated to channel the input of activators and repressors to modulate c-myc expression. We have compared cells expressing only a mutated p89 (xeroderma pigmentosum complementation group B [XPB]), the largest TFIIH subunit, with the same cells functionally complemented with the wild-type protein (XPB/wt-p89). Here, we show structural, compositional, and functional differences in transcription complexes between XPB and XPB/wt-89 cells at the native c-myc promoter. Remarkably, although the mean levels of c-Myc are only modestly elevated in XPB compared to those in XPB/wt-p89 cells, the range of expression and the cell-to-cell variation of c-Myc are markedly increased. Our modeling indicates that the data can be explained if TFIIH integrates inputs from multiple signals, regulating transcription at multiple kinetically equivalent steps between initiation and promoter escape. This helps to suppress the intrinsic noise of transcription and to ensure the steady transcriptional output of c-myc necessary for cellular homeostasis.
doi:10.1128/MCB.25.1.147-161.2005
PMCID: PMC538784  PMID: 15601838
14.  Transcriptional Consequences of Topoisomerase Inhibition 
Molecular and Cellular Biology  2001;21(24):8437-8451.
In principle, the generation, transmission, and dissipation of supercoiling forces are determined by the arrangement of the physical barriers defining topological boundaries and the disposition of enzymes creating (polymerases and helicases, etc.) or releasing (topoisomerases) torsional strain in DNA. These features are likely to be characteristic for individual genes. By using topoisomerase inhibitors to alter the balance between supercoiling forces in vivo, we monitored changes in the basal transcriptional activity and DNA conformation for several genes. Every gene examined displayed an individualized profile in response to inhibition of topoisomerase I or II. The expression changes elicited by camptothecin (topoisomerase I inhibitor) or adriamycin (topoisomerase II inhibitor) were not equivalent. Camptothecin generally caused transcription complexes to stall in the midst of transcription units, while provoking little response at promoters. Adriamycin, in contrast, caused dramatic changes at or near promoters and prevented transcription. The response to topoisomerase inhibition was also context dependent, differing between chromosomal or episomal c-myc promoters. In addition to being well-characterized DNA-damaging agents, topoisomerase inhibitors may evoke a biological response determined in part from transcriptional effects. The results have ramifications for the use of these drugs as antineoplastic agents.
doi:10.1128/MCB.21.24.8437-8451.2001
PMCID: PMC100007  PMID: 11713279
15.  Nuclear targeting determinants of the far upstream element binding protein, a c-myc transcription factor 
Nucleic Acids Research  2000;28(22):4558-4565.
FUSE binding protein (FBP) binds in vivo and in vitro with the single-stranded far upstream element (FUSE) upstream of the c-myc gene. In addition to its transcriptional role, FBP and its closely related siblings FBP2 (KSRP) and FBP3 have been reported to bind RNA and participate in various steps of RNA processing, transport or catabolism. To perform these diverse functions, FBP must traffic to different nuclear sites. To identify determinants of nuclear localization, full-length FBP or fragments thereof were fused to green fluorescent protein. Fluorescent-FBP localized in the nucleus in three patterns, diffuse, dots and spots. Each pattern was conferred by a distinct nuclear localization signal (NLS): a classical bipartite NLS in the N-terminal and two non-canonical signals, an α-helix in the third KH-motif of the nucleic acid binding domain and a tyrosine-rich motif in the C-terminal transcription activation domain. Upon treatment with the transcription inhibitor actinomycin D, FBP completely re-localized into dots, but did not exit from the nucleus. This is in contrast to many general RNA-binding proteins, which shuttle from the nucleus upon treatment with actinomycin D. Furthermore, FBP co-localized with transcription sites and with the general transcription factor TFIIH, but not with the splicing factor SC-35. Taken together, these data reveal complex intranuclear trafficking of FBP and support a transcriptional role for this protein.
PMCID: PMC113884  PMID: 11071946

Results 1-15 (15)