Background
The “timing hypothesis”, in addressing findings from the Women’s Health Initiative trial, suggests that hormone therapy (HT) use should be initiated within six years of the menopause transition to extend a favorable estrogenic environment after menopause.
Methods
We compared sex steroid and cardiovascular profiles at visit 05 in a community-based, longitudinal study of the menopause transition (Study of Women’s Health Across the Nation). Women, aged 47–57 years, were in one of four groups: premenopausal, using conjugated equine estrogen (CEE) with or without progestin, or postmenopausal (<5 years). Cardiovascular assays included low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-c), oxidized LDL-c, high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-c), triglycerides, apolipoproteins A-1 and B, F2a-isoprostanes, C-reactive protein (CRP), and lipoprotein(a)-1. Sex steroid assays were for estradiol (E2), estrogen receptor ligand load (ERLL), 2-hydroxyestrone (2-OHE1), 16α-hydroxyestrone (16α-OHE1), total testosterone, and sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG).
Results
HT users had 50% higher SHBG levels (p<0.0001 for both groups), which limits sex steroids binding to their receptors, and higher excreted estrone metabolites (more than 60%, p<0.0001 for both groups) than pre- or postmenopausal women. These were, in turn, associated with higher F2a-isoprostanes, an oxidative stress measure, compared to premenopausal women. HT users had a more favorable HDL-c/LDL-c ratio than pre- or postmenopausal women (p<0.01), but higher triglyceride levels (p<0.01).
Conclusions
Though HT users had some more favorable lipid profiles than pre- and postmenopausal women, there was evidence of adverse HT effects even in women free of atherosclerosis evaluated within the approximate 6-year time period proposed with the “timing hypothesis”.