Breast Cancer Res Volume 8(Suppl 1); 2006

Volume 8(Suppl 1); 2006

Oral Presentation

Breast interventional devices: how they evolve and define new subspecialities

F Burbank

Breast Cancer Res. 2006; 8(Suppl 1): P1. Published online 2006 July 10. doi: 10.1186/bcr1416

PMCID:: PMC3332654

Full Text PDF–350K

Evaluation of digital mammography: update on the UK position

S Cush

Breast Cancer Res. 2006; 8(Suppl 1): P2. Published online 2006 July 10. doi: 10.1186/bcr1417

PMCID:: PMC3332655

Full Text PDF–350K

Digital mammography in the United Kingdom: the reality

M Wallis

Breast Cancer Res. 2006; 8(Suppl 1): P3. Published online 2006 July 10. doi: 10.1186/bcr1418

PMCID:: PMC3332656

Full Text PDF–350K

DMISTifying digital mammography in the USA

C D'Orsi

Breast Cancer Res. 2006; 8(Suppl 1): P4. Published online 2006 July 10. doi: 10.1186/bcr1419

PMCID:: PMC3332657

Full Text PDF–350K

How are symptomatic services run in the United Kingdom?

I Monypenny

Breast Cancer Res. 2006; 8(Suppl 1): P5. Published online 2006 July 10. doi: 10.1186/bcr1420

PMCID:: PMC3332658

Full Text PDF–350K

Symptomatic breast clinics: the radiologist's perspective

MJ Michell

Breast Cancer Res. 2006; 8(Suppl 1): P6. Published online 2006 July 10. doi: 10.1186/bcr1421

PMCID:: PMC3332659

Full Text PDF–350K

The 'ideal' symptomatic breast clinic

M Kissin

Breast Cancer Res. 2006; 8(Suppl 1): P7. Published online 2006 July 10. doi: 10.1186/bcr1422

PMCID:: PMC3332660

Full Text PDF–350K

Dominance and nondominance of the radial scar/complex sclerosing lesion and associated pathology

D Birchley, JR Steel, PA Jones, CS Holgate, RM Watkins

Breast Cancer Res. 2006; 8(Suppl 1): P8. Published online 2006 July 10. doi: 10.1186/bcr1423

PMCID:: PMC3332661

Full Text PDF–350K

Audit of wide bore needle biopsies graded B3: does the final pathology justify the increasing rate of benign biopsy?

NR Wakeham, K Satchithananda, NK Barrett

Breast Cancer Res. 2006; 8(Suppl 1): P9. Published online 2006 July 10. doi: 10.1186/bcr1424

PMCID:: PMC3332662

Full Text PDF–350K

Is the Mammotome excision of indeterminate impalpable lesions found incidentally on mammography best practice?

S Lawson, A Hubbard

Breast Cancer Res. 2006; 8(Suppl 1): P10. Published online 2006 July 10. doi: 10.1186/bcr1425

PMCID:: PMC3332663

Full Text PDF–350K

Radiological predictors of successful therapeutic wide local excision of ductal carcinoma in situ : findings from the Sloane project

A Evans, K Clements, A Maxwell, H Dobson, M Wallis, G Lawrence, H Bishop

Breast Cancer Res. 2006; 8(Suppl 1): P11. Published online 2006 July 10. doi: 10.1186/bcr1426

PMCID:: PMC3332664

Full Text PDF–350K

Clinical cases covering management of borderline lesions

A Evans

Breast Cancer Res. 2006; 8(Suppl 1): P12. Published online 2006 July 10. doi: 10.1186/bcr1427

PMCID:: PMC3332665

Full Text PDF–350K

Screening with digital mammography: 2-year experiences from Vestfold County, Norway

E Vigeland, H Klaasen, TA Klingen, S Hofvind

Breast Cancer Res. 2006; 8(Suppl 1): P13. Published online 2006 July 10. doi: 10.1186/bcr1428

PMCID:: PMC3332666

Full Text PDF–350K

Symptomatic and screening film-readers: a difference in reading style?

HJ Scott, AG Gale

Breast Cancer Res. 2006; 8(Suppl 1): P14. Published online 2006 July 10. doi: 10.1186/bcr1429

PMCID:: PMC3332667

Full Text PDF–350K

Promoting early breast cancer presentation in women after their final routine breast screening mammogram

A Ramirez

Breast Cancer Res. 2006; 8(Suppl 1): P15. Published online 2006 July 10. doi: 10.1186/bcr1430

PMCID:: PMC3332668

Full Text PDF–350K

Image-guided biopsy of mammographic microcalcifications

R Vinayagam, P Gill

Breast Cancer Res. 2006; 8(Suppl 1): P16. Published online 2006 July 10. doi: 10.1186/bcr1431

PMCID:: PMC3332669

Full Text PDF–350K

Experience of quality assurance across BUPA screening centres

P Hollaway

Breast Cancer Res. 2006; 8(Suppl 1): P17. Published online 2006 July 10. doi: 10.1186/bcr1432

PMCID:: PMC3332670

Full Text PDF–350K

The Dutch experience of digital mammography in screening

R van Engen

Breast Cancer Res. 2006; 8(Suppl 1): P18. Published online 2006 July 10. doi: 10.1186/bcr1433

PMCID:: PMC3332671

Full Text PDF–350K

Ultrasound and fine needle aspiration assessment of the axilla in patients with operable invasive breast cancer

VR Stewart, L Meacock, A Ljutikov, D Evans, R Wasan, V Milnes, N Akbar, N Dutt, H Li, MJ Michell

Breast Cancer Res. 2006; 8(Suppl 1): P19. Published online 2006 July 10. doi: 10.1186/bcr1434

PMCID:: PMC3332672

Full Text PDF–350K

Wide local excision of breast carcinomas: the effect of ultrasound and wire guidance on the Surgical Precision Index

NPM Jain, CLE Osborne, CS Holgate, JR Steel, PA Jones, RM Watkins

Breast Cancer Res. 2006; 8(Suppl 1): P20. Published online 2006 July 10. doi: 10.1186/bcr1435

PMCID:: PMC3332673

Full Text PDF–350K

Audit of general practitioner referrals for breast pain to rapid access breast clinics at North Cheshire NHS Trust Hospital

C Jamieson, C Jonkers, L Robinson, A Sheridan

Breast Cancer Res. 2006; 8(Suppl 1): P21. Published online 2006 July 10. doi: 10.1186/bcr1436

PMCID:: PMC3332674

Full Text PDF–350K

Feasibility of surgeon performing ultrasound in symptomatic breast clinics: the Brighton experience

RS Rathinaezhil, C Zammit, G Rubin

Breast Cancer Res. 2006; 8(Suppl 1): P22. Published online 2006 July 10. doi: 10.1186/bcr1437

PMCID:: PMC3332675

Full Text PDF–350K

Medico-legal aspects of delay in breast cancer diagnosis: the surgeon's perspective

HM Bishop

Breast Cancer Res. 2006; 8(Suppl 1): P23. Published online 2006 July 10. doi: 10.1186/bcr1438

PMCID:: PMC3332676

Full Text PDF–350K

Medico-legal aspects of delay in breast cancer diagnosis: the radiologists' perspective

R Wilson

Breast Cancer Res. 2006; 8(Suppl 1): P24. Published online 2006 July 10. doi: 10.1186/bcr1439

PMCID:: PMC3332677

Full Text PDF–350K

Medico-legal aspects of delay in breast cancer diagnosis: the legal perspective

M Spencer

Breast Cancer Res. 2006; 8(Suppl 1): P25. Published online 2006 July 10. doi: 10.1186/bcr1440

PMCID:: PMC3332678

Full Text PDF–350K

Image-guided breast biopsy programme quality evaluation

F Burbank

Breast Cancer Res. 2006; 8(Suppl 1): P26. Published online 2006 July 10. doi: 10.1186/bcr1441

PMCID:: PMC3332679

Full Text PDF–350K

Update on breast cancer genetics

L Izatt

Breast Cancer Res. 2006; 8(Suppl 1): P27. Published online 2006 July 10. doi: 10.1186/bcr1442

PMCID:: PMC3332680

Full Text PDF–350K

NICE family history guidance and implementation update

J Mackay

Breast Cancer Res. 2006; 8(Suppl 1): P28. Published online 2006 July 10. doi: 10.1186/bcr1443

PMCID:: PMC3332681

Full Text PDF–350K

Update on the FH01 study

SW Duffy

Breast Cancer Res. 2006; 8(Suppl 1): P29. Published online 2006 July 10. doi: 10.1186/bcr1444

PMCID:: PMC3332682

Full Text PDF–350K

Update on magnetic resonance screening and the MARIBS trial

R Warren

Breast Cancer Res. 2006; 8(Suppl 1): P30. Published online 2006 July 10. doi: 10.1186/bcr1445

PMCID:: PMC3332683

Full Text PDF–350K

Workforce issues in breast imaging: radiographers as screen readers

RL Bennett, RG Blanks, SM Moss

Breast Cancer Res. 2006; 8(Suppl 1): P31. Published online 2006 July 10. doi: 10.1186/bcr1446

PMCID:: PMC3332684

Full Text PDF–350K

Workforce issues in breast imaging: the consultant radiographer's perspective

E Dean

Breast Cancer Res. 2006; 8(Suppl 1): P32. Published online 2006 July 10. doi: 10.1186/bcr1447

PMCID:: PMC3332685

Full Text PDF–350K

Workforce issues in breast imaging: the consultant radiologist's perspective

A Hubbard

Breast Cancer Res. 2006; 8(Suppl 1): P33. Published online 2006 July 10. doi: 10.1186/bcr1448

PMCID:: PMC3332686

Full Text PDF–350K

Hormones and radiation as risk factors for breast cancer

V Beral

Breast Cancer Res. 2006; 8(Suppl 1): P34. Published online 2006 July 10. doi: 10.1186/bcr1449

PMCID:: PMC3332687

Full Text PDF–350K

Breast surgery: state of the art

M Kissin

Breast Cancer Res. 2006; 8(Suppl 1): P35. Published online 2006 July 10. doi: 10.1186/bcr1450

PMCID:: PMC3332688

Full Text PDF–350K

Oncology update: what do all those acronyms mean?

L Hughes-Davies

Breast Cancer Res. 2006; 8(Suppl 1): P36. Published online 2006 July 10. doi: 10.1186/bcr1451

PMCID:: PMC3332689

Full Text PDF–350K

A brief history of breast medicine

L Lunt

Breast Cancer Res. 2006; 8(Suppl 1): P37. Published online 2006 July 10. doi: 10.1186/bcr1452

PMCID:: PMC3332690

Full Text PDF–350K

Poster Presentation

Calcification or artefact? A case study examining potential products which can mimic calcification in mammography

A Andersen, N Etheridge, S Harridge, S Llewelyn

Breast Cancer Res. 2006; 8(Suppl 1): P39. Published online 2006 July 10. doi: 10.1186/bcr1454

PMCID:: PMC3332691

Full Text PDF–350K

An audit of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging staging of the breast

M Bagnall, AE Turnbull

Breast Cancer Res. 2006; 8(Suppl 1): P40. Published online 2006 July 10. doi: 10.1186/bcr1455

PMCID:: PMC3332692

Full Text PDF–350K

Reducing our recall to assessment rate in the prevalent round to achieve the NHSBSP QA Standard

JM Leadbetter, CH Beattie

Breast Cancer Res. 2006; 8(Suppl 1): P41. Published online 2006 July 10. doi: 10.1186/bcr1456

PMCID:: PMC3332693

Full Text PDF–350K

A radiographer-delivered intervention to promote early presentation of breast cancer among women as they leave the routine protection of the NHS breast screening programme

C Burgess, L Omar, M Hunter, A Bish, MJ Michell, G Kirby, P Whelehan, A Ramirez

Breast Cancer Res. 2006; 8(Suppl 1): P42. Published online 2006 July 10. doi: 10.1186/bcr1457

PMCID:: PMC3332694

Full Text PDF–350K

Using an aubergine as a phantom for practicing stereotactic guided core biopsy

C Chapman, G Rubin

Breast Cancer Res. 2006; 8(Suppl 1): P43. Published online 2006 July 10. doi: 10.1186/bcr1458

PMCID:: PMC3332695

Full Text PDF–350K

Women's satisfaction with clinical nurse specialists at assessment clinics within the West Midlands Breast Screening Programme

J Chapman, E O'Sullivan, O Kearins, G Lawrence

Breast Cancer Res. 2006; 8(Suppl 1): P44. Published online 2006 July 10. doi: 10.1186/bcr1459

PMCID:: PMC3332696

Full Text PDF–350K

Workload analysis for clinical nurse specialists working in breast screening

J Chapman, E O'Sullivan, O Kearins, G Lawrence

Breast Cancer Res. 2006; 8(Suppl 1): P45. Published online 2006 July 10. doi: 10.1186/bcr1460

PMCID:: PMC3332697

Full Text PDF–350K

West Midlands Breast Screening General Practice Information Pack

J Chapman, E O'Sullivan, O Kearins, G Lawrence

Breast Cancer Res. 2006; 8(Suppl 1): P46. Published online 2006 July 10. doi: 10.1186/bcr1461

PMCID:: PMC3332698

Full Text PDF–350K

Pathology quality assurance: the use of control charts

E O'Sullivan, J Chapman, N Tappenden, O Kearins, G Lawrence

Breast Cancer Res. 2006; 8(Suppl 1): P47. Published online 2006 July 10. doi: 10.1186/bcr1462

PMCID:: PMC3332699

Full Text PDF–350K

Audit of short-term recall in the National Health Service Breast Screening Programme in the West Midlands

MG Pritchard, O Kearins, G Lawrence

Breast Cancer Res. 2006; 8(Suppl 1): P48. Published online 2006 July 10. doi: 10.1186/bcr1463

PMCID:: PMC3332700

Full Text PDF–350K

Modelling of the impact of replacing four-node sampling with sentinel lymph node biopsy within the NHS Breast Screening Programme

CS Cheung, O Kearins, H Davis, G Lawrence

Breast Cancer Res. 2006; 8(Suppl 1): P49. Published online 2006 July 10. doi: 10.1186/bcr1464

PMCID:: PMC3332701

Full Text PDF–350K

The Sloane Project: a UK prospective audit of screen-detected non-invasive carcinoma of the breast

K Clements, O Kearins, G Lawrence, H Bishop

Breast Cancer Res. 2006; 8(Suppl 1): P50. Published online 2006 July 10. doi: 10.1186/bcr1465

PMCID:: PMC3332702

Full Text PDF–350K

Radiotherapy for screen-detected ductal carcinoma in situ: indications and utilization in the United Kingdom – findings from the Sloane Project

D Dodwell, K Clements, WD George, G Lawrence, H Bishop

Breast Cancer Res. 2006; 8(Suppl 1): P51. Published online 2006 July 10. doi: 10.1186/bcr1466

PMCID:: PMC3332703

Full Text PDF–350K

Analysis of QA Team visit recommendation responses in order to find ways of improving the probability of completion

R Davies, O Kearins, G Lawrence

Breast Cancer Res. 2006; 8(Suppl 1): P52. Published online 2006 July 10. doi: 10.1186/bcr1467

PMCID:: PMC3332704

Full Text PDF–350K

Further mammographic views: the importance of getting it right

S Dyson, V Milnes, V Phillips

Breast Cancer Res. 2006; 8(Suppl 1): P53. Published online 2006 July 10. doi: 10.1186/bcr1468

PMCID:: PMC3332705

Full Text PDF–350K

To assess the clinical usefulness of radio-opaque marker insertion into malignant breast tumours in patients undergoing neo-adjuvant chemotherapy prior to consideration of breast-conserving surgery

SE Evans, RA Crichton

Breast Cancer Res. 2006; 8(Suppl 1): P54. Published online 2006 July 10. doi: 10.1186/bcr1469

PMCID:: PMC3332706

Full Text PDF–350K

Education within the workplace: an overview – has the emphasis on education devalued the importance of experience?

SJ Ferguson, PB Moffat

Breast Cancer Res. 2006; 8(Suppl 1): P55. Published online 2006 July 10. doi: 10.1186/bcr1470

PMCID:: PMC3332707

Full Text PDF–350K

Breast ultrasound training scheme

AG Gale, S Chambers, HJ Scott

Breast Cancer Res. 2006; 8(Suppl 1): P56. Published online 2006 July 10. doi: 10.1186/bcr1471

PMCID:: PMC3332708

Full Text PDF–350K

Digital mammography: the human factors implications

C Brace, AG Gale, M Wallis

Breast Cancer Res. 2006; 8(Suppl 1): P57. Published online 2006 July 10. doi: 10.1186/bcr1472

PMCID:: PMC3332709

Full Text PDF–350K

Mammography soft-copy reading: to digitise priors or not, that is the question

L Galloway

Breast Cancer Res. 2006; 8(Suppl 1): P58. Published online 2006 July 10. doi: 10.1186/bcr1473

PMCID:: PMC3332710

Full Text PDF–350K

Digital on the road down-under

L Galloway, G Raw, S Macaulay

Breast Cancer Res. 2006; 8(Suppl 1): P59. Published online 2006 July 10. doi: 10.1186/bcr1474

PMCID:: PMC3332711

Full Text PDF–350K

Targeting Asian women results in greater uptake for breast screening

P Gillespie

Breast Cancer Res. 2006; 8(Suppl 1): P60. Published online 2006 July 10. doi: 10.1186/bcr1475

PMCID:: PMC3332712

Full Text PDF–350K

Addressing pain on compression: women and radiographers working together

L Galloway, M Conneely, C Gibbins, P Hartney, S Hayes, A Maloney, H Varney, Radiography 'Q' Group

Breast Cancer Res. 2006; 8(Suppl 1): P61. Published online 2006 July 10. doi: 10.1186/bcr1476

PMCID:: PMC3332713

Full Text PDF–350K

Avoiding unnecessary sentinel node biopsy

JS Jeffree, Z Saad, MS Bashir

Breast Cancer Res. 2006; 8(Suppl 1): P62. Published online 2006 July 10. doi: 10.1186/bcr1477

PMCID:: PMC3332714

Full Text PDF–350K

Investigation and analysis of the benign surgical biopsy rate in the prevalent screening round (2001–2002)

JM Leadbetter, CH Beattie, P Hogg

Breast Cancer Res. 2006; 8(Suppl 1): P63. Published online 2006 July 10. doi: 10.1186/bcr1478

PMCID:: PMC3332715

Full Text PDF–350K

Imaging methods in differentiation between inflammatory breast cancer and post-treatment changes

V Lehotska, S Ivanova

Breast Cancer Res. 2006; 8(Suppl 1): P64. Published online 2006 July 10. doi: 10.1186/bcr1479

PMCID:: PMC3332716

Full Text PDF–350K

Knowledge about breast cancer and attitudes to seeking help with breast cancer symptoms among older women

L Linsell, M Cochrane, C Burgess, A Ramirez

Breast Cancer Res. 2006; 8(Suppl 1): P65. Published online 2006 July 10. doi: 10.1186/bcr1480

PMCID:: PMC3332717

Full Text PDF–350K

An aid to the viewing and reporting of the mammograms of the augmented breast

HJ Miller, J Diffy, DS Enion

Breast Cancer Res. 2006; 8(Suppl 1): P66. Published online 2006 July 10. doi: 10.1186/bcr1481

PMCID:: PMC3332718

Full Text PDF–350K

Comparison of outcome data for screen-detected and symptomatic breast cancers diagnosed in the West Midlands region in 2002

C Lagord, O Kearins, G Lawrence, H Bishop, I Monypenny, T Bates

Breast Cancer Res. 2006; 8(Suppl 1): P67. Published online 2006 July 10. doi: 10.1186/bcr1482

PMCID:: PMC3332719

Full Text PDF–350K

Breast Cancer Clinical Outcome Measures Project: national results from year 1

C Lagord, O Kearins, G Lawrence, H Bishop, I Monypenny, T Bates

Breast Cancer Res. 2006; 8(Suppl 1): P68. Published online 2006 July 10. doi: 10.1186/bcr1483

PMCID:: PMC3332720

Full Text PDF–350K

Breast lesion localisation wires: a change in practice

AJ Pavis, A Murphy

Breast Cancer Res. 2006; 8(Suppl 1): P69. Published online 2006 July 10. doi: 10.1186/bcr1484

PMCID:: PMC3332721

Full Text PDF–350K

Interpretation of mammographic breast microcalcification: interobserver variability between radiologists and mammographers and analysis of best mammographic predictors of histopathological outcomes

LS Naidu, A Kukula, P Sentance, B Baxter, R Jones

Breast Cancer Res. 2006; 8(Suppl 1): P70. Published online 2006 July 10. doi: 10.1186/bcr1485

PMCID:: PMC3332722

Full Text PDF–350K

'What's the point of it?': radiographers, women with disability and mammography screening

AE Poulos, G Llewellyn, S Balandin, A Dew, L Dark, L McCarthy

Breast Cancer Res. 2006; 8(Suppl 1): P71. Published online 2006 July 10. doi: 10.1186/bcr1486

PMCID:: PMC3332723

Full Text PDF–350K

'I want to go home': women with disability and the mammography procedure

AE Poulos, G Llewellyn, S Balandin, A Dew, L Dark, L McCarthy

Breast Cancer Res. 2006; 8(Suppl 1): P72. Published online 2006 July 10. doi: 10.1186/bcr1487

PMCID:: PMC3332724

Full Text PDF–350K

Audit to assess the quality of mammograms in a symptomatic service providing family history screening

LA Thomson, J Webley, P Pickering, S Sutton, N King, C Record

Breast Cancer Res. 2006; 8(Suppl 1): P73. Published online 2006 July 10. doi: 10.1186/bcr1488

PMCID:: PMC3332725

Full Text PDF–350K

Are there lessons to learn from review of false-negative assessment interval cancers?

N Sharma, G Smith, J Liston

Breast Cancer Res. 2006; 8(Suppl 1): P74. Published online 2006 July 10. doi: 10.1186/bcr1489

PMCID:: PMC3332726

Full Text PDF–350K

Ultrasound breast imaging versus pathology; correlation of reported benign ultrasound scans with subsequent biopsy

M Sinclair

Breast Cancer Res. 2006; 8(Suppl 1): P75. Published online 2006 July 10. doi: 10.1186/bcr1490

PMCID:: PMC3332727

Full Text PDF–350K

Pharmacokinetic, shape and texture parameters: comparison with breast tumour grade

M Sreenivas, P Gibbs, LW Turnbull

Breast Cancer Res. 2006; 8(Suppl 1): P76. Published online 2006 July 10. doi: 10.1186/bcr1491

PMCID:: PMC3332728

Full Text PDF–350K

Usefulness of magnetic resonance imaging in benign and malignant breast lesions: a pictorial review

M Stahnke, R Ramachandra

Breast Cancer Res. 2006; 8(Suppl 1): P77. Published online 2006 July 10. doi: 10.1186/bcr1492

PMCID:: PMC3332729

Full Text PDF–350K

Columnar cell change on core biopsy: radiological features and outcome

VR Stewart, A Ljutikov, N Dutt, N Akbar, R Wasan, D Evans, MJ Michell

Breast Cancer Res. 2006; 8(Suppl 1): P78. Published online 2006 July 10. doi: 10.1186/bcr1493

PMCID:: PMC3332730

Full Text PDF–350K

Use of health promotion to improve uptake in breast screening in Northamptonshire

R True, G Baxter, C Pal

Breast Cancer Res. 2006; 8(Suppl 1): P79. Published online 2006 July 10. doi: 10.1186/bcr1494

PMCID:: PMC3332731

Full Text PDF–350K

The NHSBSP age extension: completed first-round statistics from Southern Derbyshire – why it works for us!

AE Turnbull, M Bagnall, B Young, J Holmes

Breast Cancer Res. 2006; 8(Suppl 1): P80. Published online 2006 July 10. doi: 10.1186/bcr1495

PMCID:: PMC3332732

Full Text PDF–350K

Breast screening histories: variation with time and impact on 10-year survival

N Tappenden, E O'Sullivan, O Kearins, M Wallis, G Lawrence

Breast Cancer Res. 2006; 8(Suppl 1): P81. Published online 2006 July 10. doi: 10.1186/bcr1496

PMCID:: PMC3332733

Full Text PDF–350K

Audit of ultrasound-guided breast biopsy/fine needle aspiration, in response to increasing demand on service provision

A Wharton, L Khoo

Breast Cancer Res. 2006; 8(Suppl 1): P82. Published online 2006 July 10. doi: 10.1186/bcr1497

PMCID:: PMC3332734

Full Text PDF–350K

Failsafe batches: are we optimising their effectiveness for both the screening service and the woman?

ME Wheaton, S Roath

Breast Cancer Res. 2006; 8(Suppl 1): P83. Published online 2006 July 10. doi: 10.1186/bcr1498

PMCID:: PMC3332735

Full Text PDF–350K

An audit of women attending for symptomatic recall following routine NHSBSP screening at the South West London Breast Screening Service between 1991 and 2004

CM Morris, E Smith, S Davies, LS Wilkinson

Breast Cancer Res. 2006; 8(Suppl 1): P84. Published online 2006 July 10. doi: 10.1186/bcr1499

PMCID:: PMC3332736

Full Text PDF–350K

An audit of women attending for technical repeat mammography at the South West London Breast Screening Service between 1991 and 2004

CM Morris, LS Wilkinson

Breast Cancer Res. 2006; 8(Suppl 1): P85. Published online 2006 July 10. doi: 10.1186/bcr1500

PMCID:: PMC3332737

Full Text PDF–350K

Barcode data entry for film reading: information loss and consequences

S Wilson, LS Wilkinson, P Taylor

Breast Cancer Res. 2006; 8(Suppl 1): P86. Published online 2006 July 10. doi: 10.1186/bcr1501

PMCID:: PMC3332738

Full Text PDF–350K

Increased screening capacity by an extended working day on the mobile screening unit

SA Willson, P Middleton

Breast Cancer Res. 2006; 8(Suppl 1): P87. Published online 2006 July 10. doi: 10.1186/bcr1502

PMCID:: PMC3332739

Full Text PDF–350K

Articles from Breast Cancer Research : BCR are provided here courtesy of
BioMed Central

PMC Canada | Copyright | Disclaimer

PubMed Central Canada is a service of the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) working in partnership with the National Research Council's Canada Institute for Scientific and Technical Information in cooperation with the National Center for Biotechnology Information at the U.S. National Library of Medicine(NCBI/NLM). It includes content provided to the PubMed Central International archive by participating publishers.