The ability of
Salmonella serotypes to elicit diffuse enteritis in humans correlates well with their ability to elicit the epithelial promotion of PMN transmigration, but it does not correlate well with their ability to invade epithelial cells (
29). These observations indicate that salmonella-induced epithelial recruitment of immune cells is likely a key virulence mechanism underlying the enteritis elicited by some
Salmonella serotypes, such as
S. typhimurium. Yet, in contrast to the means by which bacteria gain entry into host cells, the mechanisms and microbial determinants by which
S. typhimurium elicits a mucosal inflammatory response have not been well characterized. In this report, we present two principal findings fundamental to an understanding of the molecular mechanisms by which
S. typhimurium initiates an inflammatory response (defined as the epithelial direction of PMN transmigration). First, our studies revealed that
S. typhimurium induced signaling cascades which mediate the epithelial direction of PMN transmigration can be uncoupled from bacterial internalization. Further, distinct epithelial signaling pathways mediate
S. typhimurium induction of IL-8 and PEEC secretion.
To better understand how S. typhimurium induces epithelia to direct PMN transmigration, we asked whether S. typhimurium internalization was necessary or sufficient to elicit this response. We found that neither S. typhimurium uptake via the basolateral membrane domain nor EGF-induced apical uptake of an invasion-defective (type III secretion system) mutant could elicit epithelia to secrete PEEC. Thus, as is the case for Salmonella serotypes which do not cause enteritis, S. typhimurium attainment of an intracellular position, by itself, is insufficient to induce epithelia to direct PMN transmigration. Further, blocking S. typhimurium internalization with cytochalasin showed that attainment of an intracellular position is not necessary for this bacterium’s interactions with epithelial cells to lead to PMN transmigration.
The molecular interactions between
S. typhimurium and intestinal epithelial cells that are necessary and sufficient to activate epithelia to mediate this aspect of the immune inflammatory response are not yet clear, but some insights can be drawn.
S. typhimurium activation of epithelial promotion of PMN transmigration requires a sustained interaction between this bacterium and the apical membrane of the epithelium. This is evidenced by our observation that only
S. typhimurium which interacted with the apical (but not the basolateral) aspect of model epithelia could elicit PMN transmigration. That the interaction must be sustained is based on our observation that if apically attached noninternalized
S. typhimurium are killed via the addition of gentamicin,
S. typhimurium-induced PMN transmigration is reduced by about 90% (
30). Further, this interaction would seem to be dependent on a functional
S. typhimurium type III secretion system, since the mutants of this type which we have tested are unable to induce epithelia to direct PMN transmigration (
30). Thus, we propose that, in addition to its role in mediating bacterial uptake, the inv/spa locus/type III secretion apparatus also plays a role in mediating
S. typhimurium activation of epithelial signaling pathways which regulate PMN transmigration.
We envisage at least two possible means by which
S. typhimurium might activate epithelia to direct PMN transmigration. It is possible either that
S. typhimurium engages a surface receptor that activates the epithelial signaling pathway(s) which mediate this response or that
S. typhimurium translocates an effector protein, not necessarily directly connected to invasion, into the host cell that may activate the controlling signaling pathway. If the signaling pathway activated by
S. typhimurium that results in epithelial promotion of PMN transmigration involves bacterial ligation of a cell surface receptor, the bacterial surface expression of that ligand would seem to be dependent upon a functional type III secretion system. While this cannot be ruled out, a precedent for the latter explanation has been established by the recent work of Galyov and coworkers (
13,
47). These investigators have elegantly identified a novel secreted effector protein of
S. dublin, SopB (
Salmonella outer protein), that is able to translocate into epithelial cells via a sip-dependent pathway and mediate, in part, mucosal inflammation and fluid secretion when examined in the ileal mucosae of calves (
13). Notably, the
S. dublin SopB mutant exhibited an approximately 50% decrease in both fluid secretion as well as in PMN influx in the calf ileal mucosa, despite showing wild-type levels of invasiveness for either cultured epithelial cells or intestinal mucosa. Moreover, cytochalasin treatment prevented
S. typhimurium entry but did not prevent the translocation of SopB, indicating that the translocation of SopB can be performed by extracellular bacteria (
13). These results are in agreement with our conclusion that
S. typhimurium invasion and the epithelial promotion of PMN transmigration are separable events. Other work by Galyov has also determined that another secreted effector protein, SopE, is translocated into the eukaryotic target cell by a sip-dependent mechanism and promotes bacterial entry (
47). Although a recent study (
16) has described SopE as an effector molecule capable activating several GTPases of the Rho subfamily (namely, CDC42 and rac-1) and stimulating both cytoskeletal and nuclear responses in the host cell, its role in mediating
S. typhimurium-induced PMN transepithelial migration seems less clear than SopB given that SopE mutants were found to be invasion defective as well as unable to elicit PMN transmigration (
26a). Moreover, in addition to SopB (and possibly SopE), there may be other effectors acting in concert with these two proteins in the host cell. Nonetheless, SopB appears to be a good candidate to play a role in activating the signaling events that mediate the epithelial promotion of PMN transmigration. Whether or not SopE, or cdc42 and rac-1, might also perhaps be involved awaits further study.
The final and perhaps rate-limiting step of PMN movement to the intestinal lumen is thought to be governed by the epithelial secretion of PEEC. PEEC is secreted apically and appears to direct the final step of PMN migration across the epithelial monolayer to the intestinal lumen (
31). IL-8 is secreted basolaterally and directs the prerequisite journey (at least in large part) PMN must take through the lamina propria (
28,
30). Using a pharmacological approach, we found that there are considerable differences in the epithelial signaling pathways which mediate the secretion of these chemoattractants. Specifically, we observed that IL-8 secretion, but not PEEC secretion, is potently activated by PMA and potently inhibited by an inhibitor (mg-132) of the NF-κβ-activating proteosome. There are also differences in the microbial determinants which elicit these responses, as we observed that one
S. typhimurium mutant which does not induce PEEC secretion induces IL-8 secretion to a similar extent as the wild type. That this mutant is invasion defective indicates that, as is the case for PEEC secretion,
S. typhimurium need not be internalized to elicit IL-8 secretion.
Bacteria with the ability to induce IL-8, but not PEEC, secretion is not limited to laboratory strains, since we found that this same pattern was exhibited by two different wild-type strains of
S. typhi (see Results and reference
29). Thus, it seems reasonable to consider that
S. typhi eliciting basolateral IL-8 secretion but not apical PEEC secretion might explain the observation that PMN migrate to the gut in response to
S. typhi but do not transmigrate into the intestinal lumen (
36). It has recently been observed that
S. typhi invades epithelia via a mechanism distinct from that used by
S. typhimurium. That is,
S. typhi but not
S. typhimurium entry is dependent on the expression of cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) (
41). Therefore, it is tempting to speculate that the CFTR-mediated interactions between
S. typhi and the apical membrane domain of epithelia are sufficient to activate the signaling pathways which mediate secretion of IL-8 but not PEEC. Like PEEC secretion, maximal IL-8 secretion appears to require a sustained interaction between bacteria and host, since killing noninternalized bacteria with gentamicin also reduced IL-8 secretion in response to
S. typhimurium.
It is interesting to consider some of the evolutionary implications of the interactions between these various
Salmonella serotypes and the intestinal epithelia. From the epithelial-cell viewpoint, the differential control over the release of these two PMN chemoattractants (IL-8 and PEEC) would seem to provide the host appropriate flexibility in initiating the immune inflammatory response. The host would not want to direct large-scale PMN migration to the intestinal lumen unless needed, as the resulting disruption in epithelial barrier function exposes the host to a myriad of other dangers and problems (see reference
27). From the bacterial point of view, it is interesting to consider the question of whether
S. typhimurium persists, in part, because of its ability to elicit PMN transepithelial migration or in spite of it. Considering that in immunocompromised individuals,
S. typhimurium can infect systemically, the immune inflammatory response normally induced by this bacterium would seem to be a hindrance to this organism. However, a potential benefit of inducing an inflammatory response resulting in diarrhea would be to aid in
S. typhimurium dissemination. Indeed, successful spread of this pathogen, as well as other enteric pathogens, can occur via this route, as is particularly evident in developing countries.