We have isolated and characterized the gene encoding the DNA-binding protein Mig1 from the opportunistic pathogen
C. albicans. This protein has been implicated in the glucose repression of several genes in
S. cerevisiae (
14) and in the repression of lactose metabolism in
K. lactis (
9). Although the sequence of the putative protein encoded by
CaMIG1 bears an overall resemblance to those of the yeasts mentioned and other analogues from fungi (
10), some particular characteristics merit consideration. One of them is the lack of a putative phosphorylation sequence for the protein kinase Snf1. In
S. cerevisiae, Mig1 switches its localization between the nucleus and the cytoplasm in response to a phosphorylation (
8) controlled by the protein kinase Snf1 (
38,
45). The lack of a phosphorylation sequence for Snf1 in
CaMig1 suggests that either its control is different or Mig1 has different roles in
C. albicans than in
S. cerevisiae. A peculiar characteristic is the existence of the sequence KMPPK, which is identical to one in the N-terminal region of hexokinase 2 of
S. cerevisiae, involved in targeting the protein to the nucleus and instrumental in catabolite repression (
19). Another sequence that could direct
CaMig1 to the nucleus is HKKSR, found at position 428. In
S. cerevisiae a similar motif, RKKSR, in position 364 is implicated in this function (M. Johnston, personal communication). However, in the case of
CaMig1, deletion of this sequence did not reduce markedly the complementation of the growth on glucose of an
S. cerevisiae tps1 mutant (unpublished results). Therefore, this sequence seems in this case to be not absolutely required for nuclear import.
We found that the expression of
CaMIG1 was unchanged in different conditions, a result different from that reported for
S. cerevisiae (
28). Using a fusion of the
ScMIG1 promoter to
lacZ, these authors reported that the expression of
MIG1 was decreased during growth in glucose in that yeast. This discrepancy could be due to differences in the regulation of
MIG1 expression between the two species. To our knowledge there are no reports on levels of
MIG1 mRNA in
S. cerevisiae or on the expression of
MIG1 in other yeasts.
Disruption of
MIG1 in
S. cerevisiae relieves glucose repression of the
GAL genes (
33) and partially relieves that of
SUC2 (
29) but has little or no effect on other genes whose promoters contain Mig1 binding sites (
14). Disruption of
CaMIG1 had no effect on the levels of the α-glucosidase-hydrolyzing sucrose in
C. albicans or upon the expression of
CaGAL1. An analysis of the promoters of these genes revealed that they do not present consensus sites for Mig1 binding. Expression of the
K. lactis gene
INV1, encoding invertase, is also insensitive to the functionality of the corresponding
MIG1 (
16). Expression of
CaTPS1, which has a putative Mig1 binding site in its promoter (
51), was also unaffected by the disruption of
CaMIG1 (results not shown).
In
S. cerevisiae, there are two other genes encoding homologues of Mig1:
MIG2 and Yer028c (
28,
29).
SUC2 is repressed by both Mig1 and Mig2, but no role has been established for Yer028c (
28). Our results of band shift experiments show that in
C. albicans, proteins different from
CaMig1 are able to bind to a Mig1 binding site, suggesting the existence of functional analogues of
CaMIG1.
In
S. cerevisiae, the Tup1-Cyc8 complex is recruited by Mig1 to repress glucose-sensitive promoters. Since in
C. albicans disruption of
TUP1 gives rise to filamentous growth, disruption of
CaMIG1 could have produced a similar phenotype. However this was not the case, indicating that the filamentous phenotype of
Catup1 mutants cannot be accounted for by a relief of inhibition by Mig1. Tup1 may therefore allow growth in the yeast form through its interaction with proteins different from
CaMig1. In fact, in
S. cerevisiae, Tup1 is also involved in Mig1-independent pathways (
47).
It is not clearly understood how overexpression of
MIG1 suppresses phenotypically the growth defects of the
tps1 mutation in
S. cerevisiae. In a
tps1 mutant, an excessive flux in the initial steps of sugar utilization produces a metabolic imbalance and depletes the cell of ATP. Lack of inhibition of hexokinase by trehalose-6-phosphate is one important cause of this imbalance (
2). Overexpression of
MIG1 could decrease glucose influx by repressing some of the genes encoding glucose transporters (
39). The differences in complementation for growth on glucose or fructose observed with a truncated and a full version of
CaMIG1 contrast with the similar abilities of both versions for repression of
SUC2. These differences indicate that the C-terminal region is important for some functions but dispensable for others. The importance of this region was highlighted by the observation that the 24 C-terminal amino acids of
ScMig1 fused to a DNA-binding fragment could substitute for the Mig1 protein in
S. cerevisiae (
36). However, recent results indicate that mutations in this region decrease but do not abolish repression (
37); another part of the protein must therefore provide the ability to block transcription. A potential candidate could be the region where a stretch of several leucines mimics the sequence in the effector domain (
4,
37). In the case of
CaMig1, a stretch with leucines is located around position 366 and could be the reason for the functionality of the truncated version in
S. cerevisiae.
Although
C. albicans SNF1 and
MIG1 can complement
snf1 and
mig1 mutants in
S. cerevisiae (reference
40 and this work), their roles in
C. albicans are not completely equivalent to the roles of the corresponding analogues in
S. cerevisiae. Thus, the ability of a regulatory protein to complement functions in heterologous organisms does not allow conclusions to be drawn directly about its mode of action in the original organism.