Cloning and characterization of
CAP10 revealed that the gene contains three introns and encodes a novel protein.
CAP10 was not contiguous with another transcript in close proximity. This observation was different from those obtained with the other three
CAP genes which are tightly linked with other genes:
CAP59 with
L27,
CAP60 with
CEL1, and
CAP64 with
PRE1 (
2–
4). Animal studies demonstrated that
cap10 mutants constructed by deletion or mutagenesis were unable to produce fatal infection in mice, as demonstrated with other acapsular strains of
cap59,
cap60, and
cap64 (
2–
4). Complementation of the
cap10 mutation restored capsule and virulence. Thus,
CAP10 is the fourth characterized gene required for capsule formation and virulence in
C. neoformans.
The GFP-tagged Cap10p appeared as patches within the cytoplasm of yeast cells. Because of the presence of a putative type II transmembrane region close to the N terminus, we speculate that Cap10p may be associated with certain types of organelles, although insertion of GFP may have affected the location. We used HA epitope-tagging and immunoelectron microscopy to further define the location of Cap10p without satisfactory results. Similar difficulties have been encountered using histochemical methods to localize gene products in
C. neoformans (
3,
29). Raising high-titer antibodies against Cap10p may increase the sensitivity of detecting the protein and reveal the definite location of Cap10p.
We have previously used several versions of modified GFP, including yGFP3, to tag Cap10p, but without success. The yGFP3 was used as a reporter by fusing it to different promoters of
C. neoformans (
10). It is not clear why the
CAP10-yGFP3 fusion construct failed to produce strong fluorescence. The only GFP construct that yielded satisfactory results was a hybrid GFP, pYCC352. This hybrid protein contained a portion of yGFP3 engineered for
C. albicans at the N terminus and a portion of GFP designed for the plant system at the C terminus. The success of expressing this hybrid GFP in
C. neoformans may be due to combinative effects: the removal of the cryptic intron from a thermotolerant GFP mutant (
17,
26) and introducing modified chromophore region to increase the fluorescence intensity (
7,
8). This hybrid GFP was also successfully used to localize the Cap60p (data not shown) which, by immunogold electron microscopy, has been localized to the nuclear membrane (
3). Several factors influenced the results of our hybrid GFP expression. When the promoter of
CAP10 in the GFP fusion construct was replaced with a strong inducible
GAL7 promoter of
C. neoformans (
30), the resulting construct was able to complement the acapsular mutation of TYCC150 on galactose medium. However, no GFP signal was detected in these encapsulated transformants from galactose-grown culture (data not shown). Thus, overexpression of fusion GFP showed an adverse effect on the GFP fluorescence signal. Physiological conditions of yeast cells also affected the level of GFP signals. GFP fluorescence was reliably detected only when cultures were grown on agar for no more than 24 h. When older cultures were used, not only did the GFP signals fade but also many yeast cells showed copious autofluorescence. Therefore, it may be important to have appropriate expression levels of the fusion construct for detection of GFP signals in
C. neoformans. The expression levels of the fusion construct, however, appeared to have no effect on its function to complement the acapsular mutation.
Using the
GUS gene as a reporter system, we found that
CAP10 expression is influenced by different stages of growth; the
CAP10 gene was expressed at much higher levels during the late stationary phase. It appears that there is a basal level of expression of
CAP10 in young cultures and the expression of
CAP10 increases when the nutrient of the medium is depleted. These data appear to corroborate the observations that yeast cells produce abundant capsule in late stationary phase (
16), although it is not clear how this process is regulated. Interestingly, GUS activity and accumulation of
CAP10 mRNA decreased in a strain containing a deletion of a well-conserved transcriptional factor,
STE12α. In addition, the
CAP10(
p)::
GUS reporter activity was induced by overexpression of
STE12α. Thus,
CAP10 expression is modulated by
STE12α. Since
STE12α is present only in
MATα cells, it would be of interest to know what transcriptional factor(s) controls the expression of
CAP10 in
MATa strains.
STE12α is a global regulator, which also controls the expression of several genes involved in virulence, such as capsule and phenol oxidase production (
5). Although four capsule-associated genes have been isolated, the regulation of expression of these genes is not well defined. Further investigation on the mechanisms of regulating age-dependent
CAP10 expression and how
STE12α modulates
CAP10 expression may lead to further understanding of the regulation of capsule synthesis.