Search tips
Search criteria 


Logo of vetworldVeterinary World
Vet World. 2017 November; 10(11): 1347–1352.
Published online 2017 November 16. doi:  10.14202/vetworld.2017.1347-1352
PMCID: PMC5732342

Reducing zoonotic and internal parasite burdens in pigs using a pig confinement system



This study was designed to validate the effectiveness of the pig confinement system (PCS) in reducing the prevalence of zoonotic and internal parasite burdens in pigs.

Materials and Methods:

Ten PCS households were selected together with 10 households practising traditional scavenging systems. Five pigs were monitored per household every 3 months for 15 months and blood and feces collected. Pigs received a single dose of oxfendazole at 30 mg/kg at baseline. Qualitative fecal examinations for intestinal parasite stages were performed, and serum was tested for antibodies to cysticercus of Taenia solium, Trichinella spp., and Toxoplasma gondii.


Based on fecal examination, the prevalence of pigs positive for parasite eggs was reduced in PCS pigs over consecutive samplings (Ascaris suum [14.3% to 0%], Trichuris suis [46.9% to 8.3%], Strongyle-type eggs [81.6% to 8.3%], Physocephalus spp. [6.1% to 0%], and Metastrongylus apri [20.8% to 0%]) compared with increases in the number of pigs positive for parasite eggs in non-PCS pigs (T. suis [20-61.5%], Strongyle-type [60.4-80.8%], Physocephalus spp. [8.3-15.4%], and M. apri [20.8-34.6%]) and little change in pigs positive for A. suum (18.8-19.2%). While the prevalence of pigs with antibodies against to cysticerci of T. solium reduced in PCS pigs from 18% to 14%, the prevalence in non-PCS pigs increased from 42% to 52%. Antibodies to Trichinella were not detected, but the prevalence of T. gondii antibodies increased from 6% to 10% in PCS pigs and from 7% to 24% in non-PCS pigs.


These data demonstrate the potential of a PCS to reduce the prevalence of pigs infected with zoonotic and internal parasites and thus the risk to human and pig health.

Keywords: confinement, parasite, pig, system, zoonotic


Pigs are the most popular livestock husbanded in Papua and West Papua, Indonesia, and have traditional, religious, and economic value. People in these areas rarely have latrines and tend to defecate in their gardens or the areas around their house. Pigs are commonly housed in buildings next to the family kitchen and held during the morning and evening in a common space in the center of the family compound where they defecate in the same area as dogs and children [1]. This close association between pigs, children, and dogs enables cross-infection with a range of parasites to occur. Common zoonotic parasite diseases transmitted by pigs are Taenia solium, Trichinellosis, Toxoplasmosis, and Ascariasis, and all of which contribute deleteriously to human health [2-5]. Common internal parasites in pigs include Ascaris suum, Trichuris suis, Strongyle-type helminths (Oesophagostomum dentatum, Hyostrongylus rubidus, Gnathostoma spp., and Globocephalus spp.), Physocephalus ssp., and Metastrongylus apri [6,7].

Economic losses caused by internal parasites can be significant, but farmers may not realize it because symptoms tend to be subclinical and pigs may still look healthy [3,8]. Parasites can decrease endurance by absorbing essential nutrients and interfering with vital organs, making pigs more susceptible to various diseases. The availability of synthetic chemicals for eliminating internal parasites has grown rapidly, and vaccines for Cysticercosis, Toxoplasmosis, and Trichinellosis are available [9-11]. Unfortunately, for small-scale pig farmers, they can be expensive and difficult to obtain [12].

To help address these issues in a sustainable manner, a pig confinement system (PCS) that separates and isolates pigs from both human and dog feces was developed in the highlands of Papua between 2002 and 2007. The modified PCS was designed to provide pigs with optimum housing and small paddocks (lalekens) sown with high protein pasture. Pigs were given access to water at all times and housed overnight in pens divided into wet areas for eating and dry areas, covered with cut grass, for sleeping. During the day, the pigs were rotated through 8 small paddocks with access to high protein forage pastures. They were moved to a new paddock when 50% of the leaf material had been consumed. Pigs were held in a special “dunging area” for 30 min each morning to reduce reinfection rates and contamination of pastures with parasite eggs and larvae. When pigs managed in a PCS system were fed balanced diets-based sweet potato roots and vines, they grew significantly faster (190±23.5 g/day) than either confined pigs with no access to pasture (150±33.3 g/day) and/or pigs in “free range system” (48.2±13.1 g/day) system. When compared with pigs reared in the existing scavenger system and fed diets of raw SP leaves roots and vines, pigs managed in a PCS grew up to 10 times faster (250-300 g/day). Families using PCS models produced an average of 12 pigs/sow/year, compared with 5 in traditional systems, and recovered the cost of new facilities within 3 years [1,13].

While the productivity benefits and profitability of the PCS model have been demonstrated in the previous studies, its potential to reduce the prevalence of pigs infected with zoonotic and internal parasites has not been studied. Therefore, the aim of this research was to investigate the effect of the PCS model on the prevalence of zoonotic and internal parasites in local pigs in Papua and West Papua.

Materials and Methods

Ethical approval

This study has been approved by the Animal Rights and Ethical Use Committee of Udayana University.

The study area

The study was conducted in the Baliem Valley, Papua Province, and the Arfak Villages of West Papua Province, Indonesia.

PCS and non-PCS farmers

Ten households that had been converted from a traditional scavenger system of pig production to a PCS model (PCS households) over 12 months were selected for the study together with 10 households that continued to practice traditional scavenging systems (non-PCS). All pigs were treated with a single dose of oxfendazole at 30 mg/kg 3 months before commencement of sample collection [14]. PCS farmers were given assistance in constructing a confinement system, incorporating the principles, and underpinning the PCS and advised to feed diets with plant material that has demonstrated efficacy against internal parasites for the pigs: Papaya seeds and betel nut [12,15]. Non-PCS farmers were encouraged to continue to produce pigs in the traditional non-confined way. Five pigs were monitored from each household at 3-month intervals over a treatment period of 15 months.

Sample collection

Individual fecal and blood samples were collected. Feces were collected from the rectum or off the ground only if fresh and preserved in sodium acetic formaldehyde (SAF). Serum samples were separated from each blood and stored at −20°C until analysis.

Fecal examination

Fecal samples were qualitatively examined for intestinal parasite stages by the SAF concentration technique [16].

Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for T. solium, Trichinella spp., and T. gondii

All serum samples were qualitatively screened for IgG antibodies to cysticerci of T. solium, Trichinella spp., and T. gondii using ELISA. IgG antibodies against T. solium cysticerci were analyzed using an ELISA test developed using crude antigen at Udayana University (pers. comm., Swacita, October 2012). IgG antibodies against Trichinella spp. and T. gondii were measured using a commercially available enzyme immunoassay kit (PIGTYPE®: Cellognost*-Toxoplasmosis H).

Statistical analysis

The obtained results on prevalence and seroprevalence of parasite infections in pigs were encoded and recorded in an excel database analyzed by descriptive statistics survey and were performed using Epi info version 7.2 for determination of means, percentage, and standard deviation.


The following gastrointestinal helminths were found in PCS and non-PCS pigs through qualitative fecal examination: A. suum, T. suis, Strongyle-type helminths, Physocephalus spp., and M. apri. The eggs of A. suum have been demonstrated to infect human as a zoonosis [17,18], and this species together with other helminths cause significant economic losses in pigs [3]. The prevalence of these helminth infections during the monitoring period are presented in Table-1 and Figure-1.

Prevalence of parasites infection in confinement and nonconfinement pigs during the monitoring period.
Prevalence of 5 parasite infections in confinement and non-confinement pigs during the monitoring period (0-15 months): (a) Ascaris suum; (b) Trichuris suis; (c) Strongyle type helminths; (d) Physocephalus spp.; (e) Metastrongylus apri.

Figure-1 shows the overall prevalence of zoonotic and other internal parasites to decrease dramatically in PCS pigs during the treatment period (A. suum 14%±0.35 to 0% [a], T. suis 49.9%±0.499 to 8.3%±0.274 [b], Strongyle-type helminths 81.6%±0.387 to 8.3%±0.274 [c], Physocephalus ssp. 6.1%±0.240 to 0% [d], and M. apri 20.8%±0.404 to 0% [e]), compared with an increase in the number of pigs positive for parasite eggs in non-PCS pigs (T. suis 20%±0.404 to 61.5%±0.488 [b], Strongyle-type helminths 60.4%±0.491 to 80.8%±0.392 [c], Physocephalus spp. 8.3%±0.274 to 15.4%±0.359 [d], and M. apri 20.8%±0.404 to 34.6%±0.476 [e]) and little change in pigs positive for A. suum (18.8%±0.388 to 19.2%±0.392 [a]).

Seroprevalence of parasite infections in confinement and non-confinement pigs are presented in Table-2 and Figure-2. The seroprevalence of pigs with antibodies against cysticerci of T. solium (Figure-2a) decreased in PCS pigs from 18%±0.388 to 14%±0.351, but the seroprevalence in non-PCS pigs increased from 42%±0.499 to 52%±0.505 after 12 months of treatment. Antibodies to Trichinella were not detected, but the seroprevalence of T. gondii antibodies (Figure-2b) increased from 6%±0.240 to 10%±0.303 in PCS pigs and from 7%±0.248 to 24%±0.505 in non-PCS pigs.

Seroprevalence of parasite infections in confinement and nonconfinement pigs.
Seroprevalence of 2 parasite infections in confinement and non-confinement pigs during the monitoring period (0-12 months): (a) Cysticerci of Taenia solium; (b) Toxoplasma gondii.


The overall prevalence of zoonotic and internal parasites in pigs grown according to the PCS method shows downward trends compared to that of pigs from the traditional scavenging system (non-PCS), which shows rising trends. This is in agreement with the results of a previous study which supplemented feed using papaya seeds and betel nut [15]. These feed additions have thus been proven effective to reduce pig burdens of parasites. In the PCS method, pigs are confined in a specific area [1] and have limited access to the intermediate hosts of parasites and other parasite sources in the environment. This method is effective in protecting pigs from reinfection by parasites with indirect life cycles and pig-human associated parasites.

We found that the prevalence of A. suum decreased to 0% after 15 months PCS intervention. In endemic regions such as Guatemala and China, in which both Ascaris species (A. lumbricoides and A. suum) co-occur sympatrically, two host-associated transmission patterns are observed [19,20], with low levels of and gene flow between them. In areas of non-endemic human transmission, such as the United States, Denmark, and Japan, evidence indicates that Ascaris is a zoonosis and that pigs are reservoirs for human infection [4,17]. More recently, Zhou et al. utilized multilocus microsatellite genotyping to disapprove the former hypothesis by demonstrating that pig Ascaris can indeed serve as an important source of human Ascaris even in China, areas where the two coexist, similar to what we have observed in Papua [21].

Taeniosis and cysticercosis caused by T. solium are public health problems in many endemic countries where the persistence of this zoonosis is promoted by certain cultural, socioeconomic, and sanitary conditions [22]. Case of cysticerci of T. solium in pigs has a very close relationship with human defecation habits [23]. Pigs acquire infection through consumption of human feces or through feed and drinking water contaminated with T. solium eggs. In pigs, cysts commonly develop in the skeletal muscles, tongue, diaphragm, heart, and other organs, including the brain and eye [24]. Humans are then infected through the ingestion of raw or undercooked pork [5]. The PCS system breaks this infection cycle as demonstrated by our findings.

In this study, the seroprevalence of T. gondii rose slightly; a likely explanation is that pigs in the PCS system still have contact with cats and/or consume other potential food sources of infection. Cats play an important role in the spread of toxoplasmosis as they are the only species that excrete infective oocysts into the environment [25]. Pigs in confined pens still have a chance to become infected with T. gondii, because stray cats [26] and rodents [27] still have access, but this chance is lower than for scavenging pigs.


These results demonstrate the potential of a PCS to reduce the prevalence of pigs infected with zoonotic and internal parasites and thus reduce the risk to human and pig health.

Authors’ Contributions

KKA participated in the fieldwork, did fecal examination, analysis of data and manuscript drafting; IBNS carried out the laboratory work, ELISA test and participated in manuscript drafting; IBMO and IMD participated in the fieldwork, did fecal examination and participated in manuscript drafting; CC and IMD designed the research, arranged and control the PCS and non-PCS farmers, analyzed the data and participated in manuscript drafting; RJT designed the research, arranged and control the PCS and non-PCS farmers, analyzed the data and participated in manuscript drafting.


The project was funded by the Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research (ACIAR), GPO Box 1571, Canberra ACT 2601, Australia with Project ID: AH/2007/106.

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.


1. Mahalaya S, Kossay L, Peters D, Putra I.M, Ketaren P, Soplanit A, Syahputra A.T, Cargill C.F. The Development of a Pig Confinement System Suitable for Small Scale Commercial Production. The Proceedings 16th AAAP Conference, Yogyakarta Indonesia 10th-14th November. 2014:1110–1113.
2. Gottstein G, Pozio E, Nockler K. Epidemiology, diagnosis, treatment, and control of Trichinellosis. J. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2009;22(1):127–145. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
3. Choudhury A.A.K, Conlan J.V, Racloz V.N, Reid S.A, Blacksell S.D, Fenwick S.G, Thompson A.R.C, Khamlome B, Vongxay K, Whittaker M. The economic impact of pig-associated parasitic zoonosis in northern Lao PDR. Eco Health. 2013;10:54–62. [PubMed]
4. Dutto M, Petrosillo N. Hybrid Ascaris suum/lumbricoides (Ascarididae) infestation in a pig farmer:A rare case of zoonotic ascariasis. Cent. Eur. J. Public Health. 2013;21(4):224–226. [PubMed]
5. Swacita I.B.N, Agustina K.K, Polos I.W, Fitriani S, Natalia N. Seroprevalence survey of Taenia solium cysticercosis in Mimika Region, Papua. Bul. Vet. Udayana. 2015;7(2):172–178.
6. Lee A. Internal Parasites of Pigs. Prime Fact 1149. 1st ed. New South Wales, Australia: Animal Biosecurity; 2012.
7. Agustina K.K. Identification and prevalence of Strongyle type worm in pig in Bali. Bul. Vet. Udayana. 2013;5(2):131–138.
8. Roepstorff A, Majer H, Nejsum P, Thamsborg S.M. Helminth parasites in pigs. J. Vet. Parasitol. 2011;180:72–81. [PubMed]
9. Jayashi C.M, Kyngdon C.T, Gauci C.G, Gonzalez A.E, Lightowlers M.W. Successful immunization of naturally reared pigs against porcine cysticercosis with a recombinant oncosphere antigen vaccine. Vet. Parasitol. 2012;188(2012):261–267. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
10. Liu Q, Singla L.D, Zhou H. Vaccines against Toxoplasma gondii:Status challenges and future directions. Hum. Vaccin. Immunother. 2012;8(9):1305–1308. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
11. Tang F, Xu L, Yan R, Li X. A DNA vaccine co-expressing Trichinella spiralis MIF and MCD-1 with murine ubiquitin induce partial protective immunity in mice. J. Helminthol. 2013;87(1):24–33. [PubMed]
12. Ardana I.B.K, Bakta I.M, Damriyasa I.M. The use of ripe papaya seed powder to control infection of Ascaris suum in swine. J. Vet. 2011;12(4):335–340.
13. Cargill C.F, Mahalaya S. Moving Families from Subsistence Animal Production to Small Commercial Production Using a Participatory Approach with a Multidisciplinary Team. The Proceedings 5th International Conference on Sustainable Animal Agriculture for Developing Countries. 2015:660–662.
14. Pondja A, Neves L, Mlangwa J, Afonso S, Fafetine J, Willinghamd A.L, Thamsborg S.M, Johansen M.V. Use of oxfendazole to control porcine cysticercosis in a high-endemic area of mozambique. Plos. Negl. Trop. Dis. 2012;6(5):e1651. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
15. Cargill C, Syahputra T, Damriyasa I.M. Feeding Papaya Fruits and Betel Nuts to Reduce Parasite Burdens and Increase Growth Rate in Pigs. ACIAR Project Report:AH/2006/038. 2008
16. Agustina K.K, Dharmayudha A.A.G, Oka I.B.M, Dwinata I.M, Kardena I.M, Dharmawan N.S, Damriyasa I.M. Case of entamoebiasis in pigs raised with a free range systems in Bali, Indonesia. J. Vet. 2016;17(4):570–575.
17. Arizono N, Yoshimura Y, Tohzaka N, Yamada M, Tegoshi T, Onishi K, Uchikawa R. Ascariasis in Japan:Is pig-derived Ascaris infecting humans? Jpn. J. Infect. Dis. 2010;63:447–448. [PubMed]
18. Leles D, Gardner S.L, Reinhard V, Iniguez A, Araujo A. Are Ascaris lumbricoides and Ascaris suum a single species? Parasite. Vectors. 2012;5(42):1–7. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
19. Peng W, Yuan K, Zhou X, Hu M, El-Osta Y.G, Gasser R.B. Molecular epidemiological investigation of Ascaris genotypes in China based on single-strand conformation polymorphism analysis of ribosomal DNA. Electrophoresis. 2003;24:2308–2315. [PubMed]
20. Criscione C.D, Anderson J.D, Sudimack D, Peng W, Jha B, Williams-Blangero S, Anderson T.J.C. Disentangling hybridization and host colonization in parasitic roundworms of humans and pigs. Proc. R. Soc. B. 2007;274:2669–2677. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
21. Zhou C, Yuan K, Tang X, Hu N, Peng W. Molecular genetic evidence for polyandry in Ascaris suum. Parasitol. Res. 2011;108(3):703–708. [PubMed]
22. Gilman R.H, Gonzalez A.E, Llanos-Zavalaga F, Tsang V.C.W, Garcia H.H. Prevention and control of Taenia solium taeniasis/cysticercosis in Peru. Pathog. Glob. Health. 2012;106(5):312–318. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
23. Sah R.B, Pokharel P.K, Paudel I.S, Acharya A, Jha N, Bhattarai S. A study of prevalence of Taenia infestation and risk factors. Kathmandu J. Med. 2012;10(3):14–17. [PubMed]
24. Flisser A, Rodriguez C.R, Willingham A.L. Control of 292 taeniosis/cysticercosis complex:Future developments. Vet. Parasitol. 2006;139:283–292. [PubMed]
25. Silva J.C.R, Ogassawara S, Adania C.H. Seroprevalence of T. gondii in captive neotropical felids from Brazil. J. Vet. Parasitol. 2001;102:217–224. [PubMed]
26. Jittapalapong S, Inpankaew T, Pinyopanuwat N, Chimnoi W. Epid of T. gondii infection of stray cats in Bangkok. J. Trop. Med. Public Health. 2010;41(1):13–18. [PubMed]
27. Dubey J.P, Bhaiyat M.I, Macpherson C.N, de Allie C, Chikweto A, Kwok O.C, Sharma R.N. Prevalence of Toxoplasma gondii in rats (Rattus norvegicus) in Grenada, West Indies. J. Parasitol. 2006;92(5):1107–1108. [PubMed]

Articles from Veterinary World are provided here courtesy of Veterinary World