PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of plantmethBioMed CentralBiomed Central Web Sitesearchsubmit a manuscriptregisterthis articlePlant MethodsJournal Front Page
 
Plant Methods. 2017; 13: 112.
Published online 2017 December 13. doi:  10.1186/s13007-017-0257-4
PMCID: PMC5729415

Comparison of mitochondrial gene expression and polysome loading in different tobacco tissues

Abstract

Background

To investigate translational regulation of gene expression in plant mitochondria, a mitochondrial polysome isolation protocol was established for tobacco to investigate polysomal mRNA loading as a proxy for translational activity. Furthermore, we developed an oligonucleotide based microarray platform to determine the level of Nicotiana tabacum and Arabidopsis thaliana mitochondrial mRNA.

Results

Microarray analysis of free and polysomal mRNAs was used to characterize differences in the levels of free transcripts and ribosome-bound mRNAs in various organs of tobacco plants. We have observed higher mitochondrial transcript levels in young leaves, flowers and floral buds as compared to fully expanded leaves and roots. A similar pattern of abundance was observed for ribosome-bound mitochondrial mRNAs in these tissues. However, the accumulation of the mitochondrial protein COX2 was found to be inversely related to that of its ribosome-bound mRNA.

Conclusions

Our results indicate that the association of mitochondrial mRNAs to ribosomes is largely determined by the total transcript level of a gene. However, at least for Cox2, we demonstrated that the level of ribosome-bound mRNA is not reflected by the amount of COX2 protein.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s13007-017-0257-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Keywords: Plant mitochondria, Transcription, Translation, Mitochondrial microarray, Mitochondrial ribosomes

Background

Mitochondria evolved when a free-living α-proteobacterium was engulfed by a single-celled protist [1, 2]. The engulfed cell was not digested but rather domesticated by the host cell to establish an endosymbiotic association. During the course of evolution, the mitochondrial genome was significantly reduced, due to the loss of genes or their transfer to the nuclear genome of the host cell. Consequently, protein products from genes that are now expressed in the nucleus are imported into the mitochondria [35]. Regardless of the many gene translocations, mitochondria in all multicellular organisms and most lineages of protists retained their own genome [68]. Compared to the organization and structure of mitochondrial genomes in animals and fungi, the plant mitochondrial genome is very complex [7, 9]: it can vary between 180 kb and 11.3 Mb in size, has numerous direct and inverted repeats; contains a number of (conserved) open reading frames of unknown function, as well as several gene sequences acquired from plastids or the nuclear genome [1012]. The genes that are retained in the plant mitochondrial genome encode three ribosomal RNAs, 15–20 transfer-RNAs and approximately 30 proteins that include subunits of the respiratory chain complexes and the mitochondrial ribosome, cytochrome-c, and intron maturases [13, 14].

Owing to their endosymbiotic origin, the mitochondrial genome organization and the mechanisms of mitochondrial gene expression largely resemble the proteobacterial origin [7]. Most of the genes are arranged in operons and transcribed as polycistronic mRNAs. Transcription is performed by two nuclear encoded T3/T7 bacteriophage type RNA polymerases, RpoTm (targeted to mitochondria) and RpoTmp (dually targeted to both mitochondria and plastids). These polymerases execute the steps of promoter recognition, transcription initiation and elongation in mitochondria [1517]. Once the primary transcript is produced, it undergoes several maturation and processing steps, like cis- and trans-splicing, RNA trimming and editing [18]. Translation in mitochondria is carried out by membrane-bound ribosomes. These ribosomes are associated to the inner-mitochondrial membrane through multiple tethering factors to facilitate co-translational insertion of hydrophobic proteins into the membrane, thereby minimizing their exposure to the hydrophilic environment of the mitochondrial matrix [19, 20]. During translation, multiple ribosomes are associated with an individual mRNA molecule, often referred to as polysomal or polyribosomal complex. The quantification of polysomal mRNAs is commonly used as a proxy for translational activity [21, 22]. However, the firm association of mitochondrial ribosomes to the inner membrane [19, 20, 23, 24] complicates mitochondrial polysomal mRNA quantification.

Many studies were conducted to elucidate the mechanisms that govern expression of the plant mitochondrial genome. In wheat and maize, higher levels of mitochondrial transcripts were reported from the leaf base as compared to the leaf tip [25, 26] and higher levels of atp6 and rrn26 transcripts were reported in root meristem as compared to the root cap [27]. Furthermore, variations in mitochondrial transcript levels were also revealed in seeds during imbibition [28], suggesting a transcriptional control of mitochondrial gene expression in higher plants. Other studies reported 2- to 14-fold higher expression of mitochondrial ribosomal RNA as compared to protein-coding genes [29, 30]. These differences were assumed to result from enhanced stability of structural ribosomal RNAs [31] as compared to protein-coding mRNAs.

In Arabidopsis, variations in mitochondrial transcriptional activity were revealed by comparing samples collected throughout a diurnal cycle [32]. Furthermore, comprehensive run-on transcriptional analysis of mitochondrial encoded genes showed distinct transcription rates for genes encoding components of the same multi-subunit complex. These differences were not reflected in the corresponding RNA pools, suggesting significant post-transcriptional control of mitochondrial gene expression [31]. Further evidence for differential expression of mitochondrial genes was deduced from experiments using selective chemical inhibition of either the alternative or the cytochrome c pathway of the mitochondrial electron transport chain. These treatments induced opposite effects on the expression of various mitochondrial genes indicating that the mitochondrial redox state influences gene expression [33]. Also transcriptional activity in the nucleus was shown to effect mitochondrial gene expression. Parallel profiling of mitochondrial and nuclear transcripts in Arabidopsis seeds revealed a coordinated expression of mitochondrial and nuclear genomes to maintain the stoichiometric composition of mitochondrial electron transport chain complexes [3436]. All investigations advocate that mitochondrial transcription and translation are dynamic processes and that both transcriptional and post-transcriptional processes are required to control the abundance of mitochondrial mRNAs in higher plants.

Not only RNA abundance, but also protein abundance varies in response to growth and environmental variations in mitochondria as it was documented for maize [37, 38], rice [39, 40], sugar beet [41], Nicotiana sylvestris [42], petunia [43] and Arabidopsis thaliana [34]. In these studies, increased mitochondrial protein synthesis was observed in leaves, flowers, shoots [41, 43], and seeds [34], while a decrease was reported in roots [41], after heat [39, 44], cold [40], chloramphenicol, erythromycin, cycloheximide [39] and methomyl treatments [45]. Due to differences in the stability or life time of different proteins, the reported variations in protein abundance cannot directly be used as a measure of translational activity. In yeast, gene-specific variation in the translational activity of mitochondrial encoded proteins was described to require specific translational activator proteins [46, 47]. In plants, only indirect evidence exists for such regulation, which is generally ascribed to a role of the 5′-untranslated leader sequence in the initiation of translation [48, 49], but experimental evidence is lacking. Nevertheless, mitochondrial ribosomes were shown to differentially translate mitochondrial transcripts [35], but the underlying regulation mechanisms are unknown.

To characterize the contributions of transcriptional and translational control to gene expression in higher plant mitochondria, we established an oligonucleotide-based microarray platform for Nicotiana tabacum choosing oligonucleotide sequences that could also be used to hybridize with Arabidopsis thaliana mitochondrial transcripts. Subsequently, a mitochondrial polysome isolation protocol was established for N. tabacum to analyse the polysomal mRNA abundance as a proxy for translational activity. Microarray profiling of free and polysomal mRNAs was used to investigate changes in the levels of transcripts and ribosome-bound mRNAs in tobacco leaves, roots, flowers and floral buds. In exemplary cases, western blot analysis was performed to correlate free and polysomal mRNAs with the abundance of the corresponding protein. Our data show that binding of mitochondrial mRNAs to ribosomes correlates with the total transcript level of a gene, while the abundance of tested COX2 protein does not.

Methods

Plant material

Nicotiana tabacum, cv. Petit Havana, was grown on a fertilized peat-sand mixture in the greenhouse, with 16/8 h light/dark cycle at 25/20 °C, respectively. During the day, the light intensity was maintained at 200 μE m−2 s−1. From these fertilized peat-sand grown plants, various organs (i.e. young leaves (first true leaf next to leaf primordium); fully expanded leaves (fully expanded non-senescent leaf); flowers (fully opened); and unopened floral buds were sampled as illustrated in Additional file 1: Fig. S1 Root samples were collected from plants grown hydroponically, using the following media compositions; 1 mM NH4NO3, 1 mM KH2PO4, 1 mM MgSO4, 250 μM CaCl2, 0.1 mM Fe-EDTA, 50 μM KCl, 0.1 mM H3BO3, 10 μM MnSO4, 2 μM ZnSO4, 1.5 μM CuSO4, and 0.1 μM Na2MoO4. These cultures were maintained in 10 l tanks, which were placed in a climate chamber with light/dark cycle of 12/12 h; light intensity 150 μmol s−1 m−2; temperature 20/18 °C and 75% relative humidity. The hydroponic nutrient solution was replaced every week during the first 3 weeks of culturing and twice a week in the following weeks.

Design and production of mitochondrial microarrays

An oligonucleotide microarray representing all mitochondrial genes and conserved open reading frames of both Nicotiana tabacum (GenBank accession number BA000042.1) and Arabidopsis thaliana (GenBank accession number Y08501.2) was designed, using the published sequence annotations [6, 50]. The length of the oligonucleotides was chosen between 68 and 71 nucleotides and whenever possible, the GC content was adjusted close to 50%. The number of mismatches between the N. tabacum and A. thaliana oligonucleotides was not higher than a maximum of three and their position was chosen as close to either the 3′ or 5′ end as possible because mismatches close to the center of an oligonucleotide are known to have a strong destabilizing effect on the duplex [51, 52]. The final oligonucleotide sequence was adjusted for RNA editing at those sites that had been described [6, 50]. The sequence of forty-four genes showed such a high similarity between the two species that a single oligonucleotide would hybridize with cDNAs obtained from both species. In these cases, only one oligonucleotide was spotted, derived from the Arabidopsis sequence, to represent both species. For 25 genes [ccb203, ccb206, ccb256, ccb382, ccb452, rps7, rps13, rps14, rps19, sdh3, atp6-1, apt6-2, orf101b, orf106b, orf11c, orf116, orf121a, orf160, orf130, trnE(uuc), trnF(gaa), trnH(gug), trnI(cau), trnP(ugg) and trnY(gua)], it was not possible to design a common oligonucleotide that met all the criteria, and thus separate oligonucleotides were designed here. In total, 81 oligonucleotides were selected representing Nicotiana tabacum and Arabidopsis thaliana mitochondrial genomes (Additional file 6: Table S1). To ensure reliable quantification of the signals and comparability between arrays, a series of reference and control DNA spots were also printed on the array (Lucidea Universal ScoreCard, GE Healthcare, Buckinghamshire, UK). These reference spots are comprised of artificial genes selected from yeast intergenic regions that do not cross-hybridize with RNA from most species tested (human, mouse, rat, yeast, plant and bacteria). The Piezorray robot device (PerkinElmer, Waltham, USA) was used for printing 100 pg of each oligonucleotide onto SuperEpoxy 2 DNA Substrates (ArrayIt, Sunnyvale, USA). To avoid variations in signal intensities resulting from the differences in the local background signals, the spotting scheme was randomized and printed six times on one glass slide.

Isolation of mitochondrial ribosome-bound mRNA

To analyze mRNA bound to ribosomes, polysomes were isolated as described earlier [53] with some modifications as described below. Tissue was ground in liquid nitrogen and suspended in polysome extraction buffer (sucrose 200 mM, triton X-100 1% [v/v], polyoxyethylen-10-tridecylether 2% [v/v], heparin 0.5 mg/ml, β-mercaptoethanol 100 mM, chloramphenicol 100 μg/ml, cycloheximide 25 μg/ml). In addition, to release polysomes from the mitochondrial membrane, 60 mg/ml digitonin was used (if not stated otherwise in the text) as detergent in the extraction buffer. Cell debris was removed by two times centrifugation at 13,200g. The supernatant was then loaded on top of an analytical sucrose gradient (56, 40, 30 and 15% [w/v] sucrose in buffer TKM [0.4 M Tris, 0.2 M KCl and 0.1 M MgCl2 (HCl) pH 8.5]) and centrifuged at 272,840g at 4 °C for 80 min. Each gradient was separated into ten fractions of equal volumes using a fraction collector (BioRad, Hercules, USA). RNA from all fractions was extracted with phenol/chloroform. As a control treatment to distinguish fractions containing free RNA (c.f. Fig. 1, lane 1–5) from those containing ribosome-bound RNA (c.f. Fig. 1, lane 6–10), ribosomes were dissociated by adding 1.2 mM of puromycin [54] to the polysome extract prior to loading it on the sucrose gradient. For microarray analysis, RNA from the polysomal fractions (fractions 6–10) was pooled and purified with two additional precipitation steps: firstly, RNA was precipitated with 0.5 vol. 8 M LiCl at 4 °C overnight to remove residual heparin from the solution, which could inhibit the reverse transcriptase in a subsequent cDNA synthesis step [55]. Secondly, lithium ions were removed by an additional ethanol precipitation.

Fig. 1
Optimization of the digitonin concentration for mitochondrial polysome isolation. To improve the extraction efficiency of the membrane-bound mitochondrial ribosomes, the detergent digitonin was added to the extraction buffer. The extraction efficiency ...

Isolation of nucleic acids and RNA gel blot analysis

Total plant DNA was extracted from tobacco tissues using the cetyltrimethylammoniumbromide (CTAB)-based method [56]. Total cellular RNA from tobacco tissues was extracted using the TriFast reagent (Peqlab, Erlangen, Germany) following the manufacturer’s protocol. For Northern blot analysis, RNA samples (5–10 µg) were resolved in a 13% (v/v) formaldehyde 1% (w/v) agarose gel and transferred onto Hybond nylon membranes (GE Healthcare, Buckinghamshire, UK) by capillary blotting [57]. The membrane was hybridized to [32P]dCTP radiolabeled probes, generated by labeling PCR fragments specific for cox1 (amplification primers: 5′-AGATACCCGTGCCTACTTCAC-3′ and 5′-CGACCACGAAGAAACAACAAATCC-3′), psbA (5′-ATAGACTAGGCCAGGATCTTAT-3′, 5′-ATTTTACCATGACTGCAATTTTAGAG-3′), atp9 (5′-TGTTAGAAGGTGCAAAATCAATGG-3′, 5′-AACGGACTTGGAATACGAATGAGA-3′), rps10 (5′-GACCACCAAGATAGGCATAG-3′, 5′-AAGGGTCAACGCAAGGAT-3′), 16 s rRNA (5′-CAAGCGGTGGAGCATGTGG-3′, 5′-GGCGGTGTGTACAAGGCCC-3′) and 18s rRNA (5′-ACCCCAGTCGAAGACCCCACC-3′, 5′-CGCCCGAAGCATCGGACCAA-3′) with the Megaprime DNA labeling system (GE Healthcare, Buckinghamshire, UK). Hybridizations were performed at 65 °C in Church buffer (1% BSA, 1 mM EDTA, 7% SDS, 0.5 M Na2HPO4, pH 7.2) [58]. To detect the hybridized radioactive probes, membranes were exposed to storage Phosphor Screens (GE Healthcare, Buckinghamshire, UK). A Typhoon Trio imager (GE Healthcare, Buckinghamshire, UK) was used for autoradiography.

Real-time quantitative PCR

Total RNA was treated with DNase using TURBO DNA-free kit (Ambion, California, USA). Five micrograms of RNA were reverse transcribed using the Superscript III reverse transcriptase kit (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, USA). Real time PCR amplification was performed in an optical 384-well plate using an ABI PRISM 7900 HT sequence detection system (Applied Biosystems, California, USA). The PCR reaction was based on sybr-green PCR core reagent kits (Applied Biosystems, California, USA). Data were analyzed using the SDS 2.3 software (Applied Biosystems, California, USA). Primer efficiency was calculated using the LinReg PCR program [59]. As the expression of the nuclear genes like EF1α (5′-ATGACCCAGCTAAGGGTGCT-3′, 5′-GACAGCAATGTGGGAGGTGT-3′) and GAPDH (5′-TGTGGACCTTACCGTAAGACTAGAGA-3′, 5′-CCCTCCGATTCCTCCTTGA-3′) was observed to be similar per unit fresh weight for all of the tissues and conditions tested, these genes were used as internal control to normalize the results. The CT values for these control genes were used to normalize the CT value of the RpoT (RNA polymerase) genes. The primer pairs used for RpoT genes were the same as used by Ramakers et al. [60]. When the mitochondrial DNA content per cell relative to nuclear DNA was determined, CT for a mitochondrial intergenic region (between orf112 and cob; primer pair: 5′-CCCGATACAAGCGAGCTAAG-3′; 5′-CGAGTTCATGTGCTTGCAGT- 3′), was normalized to the CT of a nuclear non-coding region (RpoTm, encoding a mitochondrial RNA polymerase; [61, 62].

cDNA probe synthesis for microarray analyses

For microarray analysis, cDNA probes were prepared by reverse transcription of 10 μg of total and polysomal RNA, spiked with 5 μg of random hexanucleotide primers and 2 μl of reference RNAs (GE Healthcare, Buckinghamshire, UK), and purified using S.N.A.P. columns (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, USA). Cy3 fluorescence dye was incorporated into the cDNA probes using the SuperScript Indirect cDNA labeling kit (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, USA). The volume of labeled cDNA was reduced through YM-10 microcons filters (Millipore, Bedford, USA). Labeled cDNA was dissolved in 130 μl microarray hybridization buffer (SDS 0.1%, formamide 25%, SSC 5×, BSA 1%, NaPP 40 mM) and denatured at 95 °C for 5 min. The denatured probe was added to the microarray slide mounted on the hybridisation station (HybArray 12, PerkinElmer, Waltham, USA).

Microarray hybridization, washing and scanning

Prior to hybridization, microarray slides were washed with 2×  SSC + 0.1% sarcosyl for 2 min, 2× SSC for 2 min, 100 °C dH2O for 2 min and ice cold 100% ethanol for 2 min (ArrayIt, Sunnyvale, USA) in the HybArray 12 station (PerkinElmer, Waltham, USA). The slides were preheated at 75 °C for 5 min and cooled to 45 °C. They were kept at this temperature until the labeled and denatured (5 min 95 °C) cDNA was added to the microarray. The hybridization was performed for 15 h using a stepwise decrease of the temperature, starting at 44 °C for 1 h and decreasing one degree every hour until 41 °C. This final temperature was kept for another 12 h. At the end of hybridization, the slides were washed with microarray wash buffers I (SSC 2×, N-lauroylsarcosine sodium salt 0.1%), II (SSC 0.2×, N-lauroylsarcosine sodium salt 0.1%), and III (SSC 0.2×), to remove non-specifically bound probe. The slides were dried by centrifugation for 10 min at 1500 rpm. Cy3 fluorescence was detected by scanning the microarray slides with the FLA-8000 scanner (Fujifilm, Straubenhardt, Germany) with a resolution of 10 μm. The photo-multiplier tube detector was set to the highest possible sensitivity during the scanning process.

Mitochondrial microarray data normalization and visualization

After scanning the microarray slides, the images were analyzed using the Genespotter software (Microdiscovery, Berlin, Germany). Gene spots were selected manually to ensure that the data evaluation was based on spot signals only without any background interference. Mean pixel values obtained after local background subtractions were quantified using a calibration curve from Lucidea Universal ScoreCard controls (GE Healthcare, Buckinghamshire, UK). Reference RNA that was added to the RNA samples allowed signal quantification, as the signal intensities of the reference cDNAs were plotted against the corresponding RNA amounts to record a calibration curve (Additional file 3: Fig. S3). It was then possible to calculate the relative expression values to ensure comparability between independently hybridized arrays. Normalization of the signal intensities from various slides was performed by dividing the mean pixel values with the factor obtained by calculating the slope of the calibration spots. The data obtained were multiplied by the difference in median of the various replicates. These median corrected values were used to calculate the mean values of the biological replicas and were expressed either as RNA abundance per microgram of total RNA and/or log2 ratios. The TIGR MeV software [63] and Microsoft Excel were used for data analysis and visualization. The normalized microarray data was used for the estimation of significant changes with a 2-way ANOVA (p < 0.05) using SigmaPlot.

Preparation of mitochondria

Mitochondria were isolated as described by [64]. Briefly, tissues were harvested and homogenized in BoutHomX buffer (0.4 M sucrose, 50 mM Tris, 1 mM EGTA, 10 mM KH2PO4, 0.1% PVP-630, 1% fat-free BSA, 5 mM β-mercaptoethanol, pH 7.6 with HCl). The homogenate was filtered and centrifuged at 3800g for 5 min. The tissue debris was discarded. Mitochondria were enriched by two additional steps of centrifugation at 22,000g and 18,000g for 15 min. The resulting pellet was resuspended in gradient medium (0.5 M sucrose, 1% BSA-fat free) and layered on top of Percoll gradients (10 ml of 18% [v/v], 15 ml of 26% [v/v], and 30 ml of 50% [v/v] Percoll in 0.5 M Sucrose and 1% BSA). After centrifugation for 12 min at 40,000g, mitochondria were collected from the 26/50% interphase. To remove the Percoll, purified mitochondria were washed with BoutWashY (0.4 M mannitol, 10 mM KH2PO4, 0.1% BSA, pH 7.2 with KOH) and centrifuged at 17,000g for 10 min. The pellet was resuspended in BoutWashY and stored at − 80 °C.

Western blot analysis

Mitochondrial proteins were extracted according to published protocols [65] with a few modifications. The extraction buffer was supplemented with 0.02% N-lauroylsarcosine and 0.02% Triton X-100 [66]. 0.75, 1.5, 3 and 6 µg of mitochondrial proteins were separated by electrophoresis on 15% SDS-containing polyacrylamide gels. The gels were either stained with Coomassie Brilliant Blue (Serva, Heidelberg, Germany) or blotted onto polyvinylidene difluoride membranes (Hybond-P, GE Healthcare, Buckinghamshire, UK). For blotting experiments, the separated proteins were transferred onto polyvinylidene difluoride membranes (Hybond-P; GE Healthcare, Buckinghamshire, UK) using the tank blot system (Perfect Blue Web M, PeqLab, Erlangen, Germany) and a standard transfer buffer (25 mM Tris, 192 mM glycine, pH 8.3). Membranes were treated with blocking buffer (20 mM Tris–HCl, pH 7.6, 137 mM NaCl, 0.1% Tween 20, and 0.5% BSA) overnight and subsequently incubated for 1 h with COX2 monoclonal antibody, diluted in buffer (20 mM Tris–HCl, pH 7.6, 137 mM NaCl, and 0.1% Tween 20). COX2 antibody dilution was 1:1000. Secondary rabbit anti-mouse IgG conjugated to horseradish peroxidase were detected with the ECL Plus proteins gel blotting detection system (GE Healthcare, Buckinghamshire, UK).

Results

Establishment of a mitochondrial microarray and polysome isolation protocol

To analyse mitochondrial transcript levels, we established a mitochondrial genome specific microarray that contains 81 oligonucleotides covering all genes and conserved open reading frames of the Nicotiana tabacum and Arabidopsis thaliana mitochondrial genomes (Additional file 6: Table S1). First, the microarray spotting and hybridization conditions were optimized to check if a linear relationship exists between signal intensity and RNA concentrations. To achieve this, a series of negative and reference DNAs were spotted on the array that are part of the Lucidea Universal ScoreCard controls and cover a range of 1 pg to 10 ng of DNA for quantification. The data from these references revealed that a linear relationship exists between the signal intensities and the corresponding RNA amounts (Additional file 3: Fig. S3). Next we observed that most of the RNA species represented on the microarray are quantifiable except rRNAs and tRNAs. The rRNAs were difficult to quantify, since their corresponding spots were always found to be fully saturated, obviously because the rRNAs are at least 10 to 50 times more abundant than mRNAs. Many tRNA sequences were almost identical to those encoded by the plastid genome (Additional file 8: Table S2), which precluded interpretation of variations in signal intensities. Therefore, the spotting and hybridization conditions were optimized to quantify the mRNAs and the data for rRNAs and tRNAs were not included in the analyses.

To analyse mRNAs bound to ribosomes, polysomes were isolated and the mRNA bound to them was quantified using the above mentioned microarrays. To isolate poly-ribosomal mRNAs, a sucrose density gradient centrifugation method was employed [53] and the distribution of mRNAs between the light and heavy fractions of the density gradient was determined by Northern blots (Fig. 1). Firstly, the same conditions were used as described for the isolation of plastid polysomes [53], but the resulting data revealed only very weak signals for mitochondrial cox1 mRNA in the heavier density gradient fractions (Fig. 1a–i; fractions 6–10), while the signals for plastidial psbA mRNA were found fairly distributed throughout the gradient (Fig. 1b–i; fractions 6–10). This suggested that the existing protocol is unsuitable for the extraction of mitochondrial polysomes and additional modifications were needed to make the protocol suitable for the isolation of mitochondrial poly-ribosomal complexes that are known to be largely membrane bound [19, 20]. To do so, the extraction buffer was supplemented with three different concentrations of the detergent digitonin (50, 60, 75 mg/ml, respectively). Upon addition of 50 mg/ml digitonin to the extraction buffer, we observed an increase in cox1 signal in the heavy fractions of the density gradient (fractions 6–10), which was further enhanced upon adding 60 mg/ml digitonin (Fig. 1a, ii–iii). However, when 75 mg/ml of digitonin was added to the extraction buffer, the signal for the cox1 mRNA was shifted towards the lighter gradient fractions (Fig. 1a, iv). Likewise, the gradual increase in the digitonin concentration resulted in a decrease in the plastidial psbA signal in the heavier gradient fractions (Fig. 1b, ii–iv), indicating that increased digitonin concentrations result in the release of ribosomes from plastidial mRNAs. Based on these observations, 60 mg/ml of digitonin was considered optimal for the release of mitochondrial poly-ribosomes from the inner mitochondrial membrane.

Mitochondrial gene expression in tobacco organs

Changes in the mRNA abundance of mitochondrial encoded genes were investigated in young leaves, fully expanded leaves, roots, flowers and floral buds of tobacco. To this end, signal intensity values were normalised per µg of total RNA extracted from the tissue (Fig. 2; Additional file 5: Dataset S1). Moreover, to compare the differences in transcript abundances between these tissues and to mark significant changes, the data for each tissue was used as a reference to calculate ratios and presented as a heat map in a log2 scale (Additional file 2: Fig. S2). Analysis of the transcript levels revealed that mitochondrial transcripts were more abundant in flowers and floral buds as compared to fully expanded leaves and roots (Fig. 2; Additional file 2: Fig. S2b, c). In young leaves, transcripts for nad7, cox1, rpl2, rpl5, rps3, rps10, rps14, matR, orf116, and orf315 were lower in abundance compared to flowers and floral buds, whereas orf101b and orf121a transcripts were higher in abundance than in flowers. The other transcripts have very similar levels in young leaves as observed in flower and floral buds (Fig. 2; Additional file 2: Fig. S2d–e). In roots, transcripts were lower in abundance as compared to young leaves, except for nad2, nad4, nad7, cox1, atp1, rpl2, rpl5, rps3, rps10, rps14, rps19, ccmFc, matR, orf101b, orf116, orf160, orf315, and orfX which were not significantly different in abundance between both organs (Fig. 2; Additional file 2: Fig. S2a). In fully expanded leaves, transcripts for atp1, rpl2, rpl5, rps3, rps14 rps19, matR, orf116, orf121a and orf160 were lower in abundance as compared to roots, while all other transcripts had similar abundances (Fig. 2; Additional file 2: Fig. S2c). To verify these observations, selected genes (cox1, atp9, and rps10) were additionally investigated by Northern blot analysis (Fig. 3). The pattern of transcript abundances determined by Northern blotting corresponded exactly to the differences in expression levels that had been observed in our microarray analyses (cf. Figs. 2, ,33).

Fig. 2
Mitochondrial RNA abundance in tobacco organs. RNA levels of mitochondrial transcripts in young leaves, fully expanded leaves, roots, flowers and floral buds. Values represent relative transcript levels per µg of total RNA (Additional file 5: ...
Fig. 3
Northern blot analysis of mitochondrial RNA abundance in tobacco organs. a The analyzed tissues are indicated above the blots. Three mitochondrial genes (cox1, atp9 and rps10) were analyzed to confirm the pattern of mitochondrial mRNA abundance observed ...

Mitochondrial DNA copy number per cell in different tobacco organs

To correlate mitochondrial transcript levels with the mitochondrial DNA copy number in different tissues, the amount of mitochondrial DNA per cell was determined through quantitative real-time PCR analysis and normalised to the nuclear DNA content of the tissue. In tobacco nuclear DNA content can be used as a reference since tobacco cells are diploid and do not undergo somatic endopolyploidization. This analysis revealed that similar amounts of mitochondrial DNA are present in all tobacco organs tested (young leaves, fully expanded leaves, roots, flowers and floral buds; Fig. 4a). Therefore, it can be concluded that the variation observed in mitochondrial transcript levels (through microarray analysis and Northern blotting; Figs. 2, ,3)3) is not caused by different abundance of mitochondrial DNA in these tobacco organs.

Fig. 4
Determination of mitochondrial DNA content per nuclear DNA and the expression analysis of RpoT genes in tobacco organs using qRT-PCR analysis. Young tobacco leaves, fully expanded leaves, roots, flowers and floral buds were assayed for mitochondrial DNA ...

Expression of RpoT genes in tobacco organs

To determine if a correlation exists between the expression patterns of nuclear encoded mitochondrial RNA polymerases and mitochondrial encoded genes, the expression of RpoTm (mitochondria) and RpoTmp (mitochondria and plastids) was quantified through qRT-PCR. This analysis illustrated significantly higher abundance (4–6-fold) of RpoTm and RpoTmp transcripts in fully expanded leaves relative to young leaves, roots, flowers and floral buds (Fig. 4b, c). By contrast, comparable levels of RpoTm and RpoTmp transcripts were found in young leaves, roots, flowers and floral buds. This suggests that the differences detected in mitochondrial transcript levels through microarray analysis are not primarily caused by alterations in RpoTm and RpoTmp transcript levels in these organs.

Mitochondrial ribosome-bound mRNA abundance in tobacco organs

To analyse the abundance of mRNAs that are associated with mitochondrial ribosomes, polysomal RNA isolation was carried out for young leaves, fully expanded leaves, roots, flowers and floral buds (Fig. 5; Additional file 7: Dataset S2). Signals were obtained for all mitochondrial mRNA species in the polysomal fractions using the microarray. We observed that the levels of ribosome-bound mRNAs are higher in flowers and floral buds compared to fully expanded leaves and roots. In young leaves, the ribosome-bound mRNA levels were, on average, only half as abundant as in flowers and floral buds. Notable exceptions are matR, orf315 and orfB, which were as abundant in flowers and floral buds. In fully expanded leaves and roots similar levels of ribosome-bound mRNAs were present, except for atp1 which was lower in abundances and ccmFc, orf101b, orf121a, and orfX which were higher in abundance in fully expanded leaves compared to roots.

Fig. 5
Ribosome bound mRNA abundance in tobacco organs. Abundance of mRNA bound to ribosomes in young leaves, fully expanded leaves, roots, flowers and floral buds of tobacco. Values represent relative polysomal RNA levels per µg of ribosome-bound RNA ...

To validate, the abundance of mitochondrial ribosome-bound mRNA levels detected through microarray analysis, Northern blot analyses of fractionated polysome gradients were carried out, using cox1 and atp9 gene-specific probes (Fig. 6). In these experiments, the cox1 mRNA was found to be more abundant in the dense gradient fractions of flowers and floral buds and to a less extent of young leaves than in those of fully expanded leaves and roots (Fig. 6a). Although the cox1 mRNA also could be detected in all polysomal fractions from fully expanded leaves and roots, the signals are much weaker than in young leaves, flowers and floral buds. Also, the abundance of atp9 mRNA in the ribosome-bound fractions was detected to be higher in young leaves, flowers and floral buds as compared to fully expanded leaves and roots (Fig. 6b). This analysis confirms the pattern for ribosome-bound mRNA levels as observed through microarray hybridization experiments for these organs.

Fig. 6
Northern blot analysis of mitochondrial ribosome-bound mRNA levels in different tobacco organs. Polysome gradients were fractionated into ten fractions, and equal aliquots of extracted RNAs were separated by denaturing agarose gel electrophoresis, blotted, ...

To visualize gene-specific differences in polysome-bound mRNA levels between the different tissues, the data for each tissue were taken as a reference to calculate ratios (Fig. 5; Additional file 3: Fig. S3; Additional file 7: Dataset S2). This analysis showed an overall significantly higher abundance of ribosome-bound mRNA levels in young leaves, flowers and floral buds compared to roots (Additional file 3: Fig. S3b). The changes in polysomal mRNA levels between fully expanded leaves and roots were negligible for most of the genes, except for atp1 (less abundant in fully expanded leaves compared to roots), ccmFc, orf101b, orf116, orf121a and orfX (more abundant in roots compared to fully expanded leaves) (Additional file 3: Fig. S3b, c). In flowers and floral buds, polysomal mRNA levels showed a clear tendency to be higher in abundance as compared to young leaves (Additional file 3: Fig. S3a). However, the relative amount of ribosome-bound mRNA in flowers compared to floral buds and vice versa indicated for the most part little or no difference between the two organs (Additional file 3: Fig. S3d, e). Overall, this analysis confirmed that mitochondrial ribosome-bound mRNAs levels are significantly higher in young leaves, flowers and floral buds as compared to fully expanded leaves and roots.

To determine whether the ribosome-bound mRNA levels in the different organs correspond to the actual protein levels, western blot analysis was conducted. To this end, we tested antibodies against the RPS12 [67], RPS13 [68] and COX2 [69] proteins. Only the COX2 antibody (kindly provided by Prof. Thomas D. Fox, Cornell University, USA) was found to react specifically. We observed that the COX2 protein accumulates to the highest level in tobacco roots, followed by fully expanded and young leaves. The lowest levels were detected in flowers and floral buds (Fig. 7). Remarkably, this pattern of protein abundance is exactly reciprocal to the transcript and ribosome-bound mRNA levels observed for these organs.

Fig. 7
Western blot analysis to determine COX2 protein abundances in tobacco organs. Mitochondria isolated from young leaves, fully expanded leaves, roots, flowers and floral buds for western blot analysis using anti-COX2 antibody (provided by Prof. Thomas D. ...

Discussion

Establishing a mitochondrial microarray and mitochondrial polysome analysis

In the course of this study, an oligonucleotide microarray platform for the Nicotiana tabacum and Arabidopsis thaliana mitochondrial genomes was developed to study changes in mitochondrial transcript levels. In total, this microarray contains 81 oligonucleotides covering all genes and conserved open reading frames (Additional file 6: Table S1). The length of oligonucleotides was fixed to 70-bases because arrays based on 70-bases long oligonucleotides were reported to be 4-fold more sensitive as compared to 50- and 60-bases long oligonucleotide arrays. Furthermore, 70-mer oligonucleotide arrays were also found to produce hybridization signals comparable to PCR amplicon based arrays [7074]. Therefore, to detect mitochondrial transcripts at the highest possible sensitivity, we have used only one 70-mer oligonucleotide probe for all genes represented on our microarray.

To analyze mRNAs associated with ribosomes, mitochondrial polysome isolation was optimized. In yeast, the isolation of mitochondrial ribosomes was shown to be possible by supplementing the extraction buffer with ionic (2–4%, sodium deoxycholate) and/or non-ionic (0.2–0.5% triton) detergents [7577]. Therefore, to improve the extraction efficiency of membrane-bound ribosomes from plant mitochondria, we have supplemented the extraction buffer with different concentrations (50, 60 and 75 mg/ml) of digitonin. Digitonin can readily disrupt the outer mitochondrial membrane as it contains substantial amount of cholesterol [78, 79] however, to lyse the inner mitochondrial membrane, that is devoid of cholesterol [80] high concentrations of digitonin was required for the release of mitochondrial membrane-bound ribosomes in the present study.

To observe the release of mitochondrial polysomes and to distinguish between polysomal and non-polysomal mRNA fractions of the sucrose density gradients, a series of Northern blot experiments were conducted (Fig. 1). First, the polysomal fractions were distinguished from the non-polysomal ones by treating part of the sample with puromycin prior to centrifugation (Fig. 1; plus puromycin). Secondly, to identify the optimal digitonin concentration for efficient release of mitochondrial polysomes from the inner mitochondrial membrane, different digitonin concentrations were tested. We observed that, with the initial increase in digitonin concentration from 50 to 60 mg/ml of extraction buffer, the signals from mitochondrial ribosome-bound mRNAs were enhanced in the heavy gradient fractions, but shifted to lighter gradient fractions upon further increasing the digitonin concentration to 75 mg/ml. The improved polysome yield at 60 mg/ml compared to 50 mg/ml probably can be attributed to more efficient solubilization of mitochondrial membranes, thus releasing more poly-ribosomal complexes. A further increase of the digitonin concentration to 75 mg/ml, apparently, does not only solubilize the mitochondrial membranes, but also results in partial dissociation of poly-ribosomal complexes from the mRNA, thus shifting the cox1 signals to lighter gradient fractions (Fig. 1a). Consistent with this interpretation, the increase in digitonin concentration also resulted in the release of plastidial poly-ribosomes from the mRNA molecules, thus shifting the psbA signals to lighter gradient fractions (Fig. 1b). This indicates that digitonin concentrations higher than 60 mg/ml are not suitable for the isolation of polysomes. Based on the Northern blot experiments, 60 mg/ml of digitonin was chosen to release the maximum number of mitochondrial poly-ribosomal complexes from the inner mitochondrial membrane while minimizing polysome dissociation.

In the current study, we have opted to design a microarray platform rather than using Northern blotting, RT-qPCR or RNAseq, but any of these alternative techniques could have been used to evaluate polysome loading. The microarray and polysome protocol as established here allows the simultaneous monitoring of relative RNA levels and their translational state from multiple samples. In fact, the developed microarray greatly extends the biological capability of mitochondrial gene expression screening experiments. However, recently, next generation sequencing methodology has tremendously improved the detection sensitivity and accuracy of mitochondrial RNA species [81]. RNA seq analysis of mRNA associated with ribosomes has not only made it possible to precisely detect the translational expression profiles of characterized and uncharacterized protein-coding open reading frames (ORFs) but also of intergenic regions [81].

Mitochondrial transcript levels vary strongly between tobacco organs

Comparison of mitochondrial transcript levels from young leaves, flowers, floral buds, fully expanded leaves and roots revealed lowest transcript levels in fully expanded leaves and roots and relatively high levels in floral tissue. Comparing young leaves with fully expanded leaves shows that transcript levels decrease throughout development (Fig. 2). The differences in transcript abundances among the organs could neither be explained on the basis of mitochondrial DNA content per cell in these organs and nor did it correlate with the expression level of mitochondrial RNA polymerases. Previous studies to characterize mitochondrial transcription and its regulation in wheat and maize demonstrated a similar developmental gradient within a leaf; i.e. higher expression in the basal, meristematic cells and lower expression in the senescing cells at the tip. The higher mitochondrial transcript levels as detected in young leaves, flowers and floral buds might be related to the activity of cell division, growth and differentiation in these tissues as compared to fully expanded leaves and roots [27]. This is also supported by the higher expression levels of mitochondrial genes in flowers compared to leaves in maize, and in floral tissues compared to seedlings in sunflower [82, 83].

In brief, our results demonstrate that mitochondrial transcription machinery respond to cell division, tissue growth and differentiation, not in a gene specific or functional category specific manner but rather it transcribe all genes on the mitochondrial genome. A general view of our results suggests that higher mitochondrial transcripts are present in tissues with higher cell division, perhaps reflecting the requirement for a more active mitochondrial biogenesis in these tissues. However, active mitochondrial biogenesis is not always correlated with higher mitotic activity [84], therefore, the observed differences in mitochondrial transcripts must be related to tissue specific developmental process, perhaps more related to mitotic activity of the cell rather than mitochondrial biogenesis as mitochondrial genome copies per cell remained similar in these tissues.

The level of ribosome-bound mRNA in mitochondria is largely determined by the overall transcript level of a gene

In the present study the level of ribosome-bound mRNAs was in general higher in mitochondria from young leaves, flowers and floral buds than in fully expanded leaves and roots. In young leaves, ribosome-bound mRNA levels are lower than in flowers and floral buds (Fig. 5). Previously, organ-specific expression of mitochondrial proteins was demonstrated in several plant species using one- or two-dimensional gel electrophoresis. For example, mitochondrial proteins synthesis was shown to vary between cobs, tassels, kernel scutella and shoots in maize [38]; between green leaves, etiolated leaves and hypocotyls in pea [85]; between flowers, roots and leaves in sugar-beet [41]; and between developing pollens and leaves in Nicotiana sylvestris [42]. In our study, we showed for the COX2 protein that, higher ribosome-bound mRNA levels were associated with lower protein levels and lower ribosome bound mRNA levels were associated with higher protein levels. This indicates that, in plant mitochondria, the level of ribosome-bound mRNAs does not necessarily reflect the actual protein abundance, suggesting that significant regulation occurs at the post-translational level. However, since we could only obtain specific antibodies for COX2 protein, further studies are required in the future to investigate the general relation between mitochondrial protein abundance and mRNA association to the mitochondrial ribosomes.

In the present study, variation in total mitochondrial transcript levels followed similar patterns as ribosome-bound mRNAs (compare Figs. 2, ,5).5). This implies that, in plant mitochondria, the transcript level has a strong influence on the amount of mRNA that is translated (or at least associated with ribosomes). The lifetime of individual mRNAs is known to be influenced by their association with ribosomes: in most instances, ribosomes act as protective barriers to hinder mRNA cleavage by ribonucleases [86]. Here, we have observed that organs with high mitochondrial transcript abundances also have higher ribosome-bound mRNA levels and those with lower transcript levels have lower ribosome-bound mRNA levels, possibly suggesting that mitochondrial mRNAs are stabilised by binding of ribosomes.

Although it is tempting to use ribosome binding of mRNAs as a proxy for translational activity, polysome association is not necessarily positively correlated with the actual protein abundance. This is due to the impacts of post-translational modifications, regulated proteolysis, protein folding and assembly into complexes on the lifetime of a protein. This consideration is also valid for the results presented here, where the ribosome-bound mRNA levels did not correspond to the actual protein abundance in that organs with high mitochondrial ribosome bound cox2 mRNA levels showed low COX2 protein abundance.

Our results indicate that ribosome binding of mRNAs though signifies active translation but it does not reflect the impact of post-translational modification on the lifespan of a protein. In other words, the discrepancy observed between the ribosome bound mRNAs and the actual protein levels might have resulted from the differences in the in vivo half-life of mitochondrial encoded proteins in these organs. This means that mitochondrial proteins might have produced in the tissue revealing active ribosome loading but get degraded either due to premature chain termination, being damaged or unstable. The latter is particularly relevant to proteins that are components of the multi-protein complexes and whose stability depends on the accumulation of other subunits in stoichiometric amounts [48]. Thus, the mechanism controlling the actual protein abundance in plant mitochondria seems to be operative during and after translation.

Additionally, mitochondrial genes also contain multiple introns [37, 87, 88] and their transcripts show multiple signals by Northern analysis. Since the loading of transcripts by the polysomes is dependent on the 5ʹ flanking sequences and both spliced and un-spliced transcripts contain identical regions flanking the start codon, there seems to be no basis for the discrimination of spliced and un-spliced transcripts by the ribosomes. In fact, both spliced and un-spliced precursor mRNAs were found attached to the mitochondrial ribosomes directing the synthesis of polypeptides that prematurely terminate during the translation of intron sequences [37, 89]. For the current study, some microarray probes like the one designed for nad2 and nad5 cannot detect un-trans-spliced polysomal mRNAs, since these probes were designed to bind to downstream exons. This suggests that splicing efficiencies might affect detection of polysome associated mRNAs through established mitochondrial microarray. Therefore, the data presented here for microarray analysis of mitochondrial polysomal mRNA present signals only for fully spliced transcripts for nad2 and nad5.

Moreover, both edited and unedited transcripts are known to get attached by the mitochondrial ribosomes resulting into fully edited and partially edited proteins [67, 90, 91]. However, only fully edited proteins become part of the multi-subunit protein-complexes [9092]. This suggests that while all mitochondrial mRNAs are translated indiscriminately of their editing status, selection occurs post-translationally due to which ribosome binding of mRNA do not reflect the actual protein abundances. In short, the observed disparities between ribosome bound mRNA and COX2 protein abundance in various tissues require future investigations to study the importance of post-translational mechanisms like protein structural modification and degradation in the regulation of translation in plant mitochondria.

Conclusions

In conclusion, a technical platform was established to determine mitochondrial transcript levels, together with the optimization of a method to isolate mitochondrial polysomes to analyse ribosome-bound mRNAs. The analysis indicates that transcript levels vary proportionally to the ribosome-bound mRNA levels. For one protein, COX2, the actual abundance of protein was tested as well for the various tissues and appeared not to correlate with the mRNA level and the intensity of ribosome association. From our work and other studies discussed here, it is concluded that it should be considered that mitochondrial gene expression is influenced at different levels, and post-translational control mechanisms can override changes at the transcriptional and/or translational level.

Additional files

Authors’ contributions

JTD and RB conceived the work. JTD, RB and MWH designed the experiments. MWH and IJ performed the experiments. JTD, MWH and AL analyzed the data. MWH, JTD and RB wrote the paper. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

We are thankful to Dr. Sabine Kahlau and Dr. Kerstin Petersen (MPI-MP, Germany) for help and guidance in the establishment of mitochondrial microarray platform and polysome isolation protocol. We are grateful to Prof. Mike Mulligan (University of California, Irvine, USA) and Prof. Thomas D. Fox (Cornell University, USA) for kindly providing antibodies for western blot analysis. We are also thankful to Dr. Abdelhalim Larhlimi (MPI-MP, Germany) for help with the statistical analysis of our microarray data.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated and analyzed during this study are included in this published article and its additional files.

Consent for publication

All the authors have approved the manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Funding

This research was funded by the Max Planck Society.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Footnotes

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s13007-017-0257-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Contributor Information

Muhammad Waqar Hameed, moc.liamg@31raqawm, ude.scci@hwm.

Ilona Juszczak, ed.nnob-inu@azczsuji.

Ralph Bock, ed.gpm.mlog-pmipm@kcobr.

Joost Thomas van Dongen, ed.nehcaa-htwr.1oib@negnod.

References

1. Dyall SD, Brown MT, Johnson PJ. Ancient invasions: from endosymbionts to organelles. Science. 2004;304(5668):253–257. doi: 10.1126/science.1094884. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
2. Wernegreen JJ. Endosymbiosis. Curr Biol. 2012;22(14):R555–R561. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2012.06.010. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
3. Hager M, Bock R. Enslaved bacteria as new hope for plant biotechnologists. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2000;54(3):302–310. doi: 10.1007/s002530000397. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
4. Mackenzie SA. Plant organellar protein targeting: a traffic plan still under construction. Trends Cell Biol. 2005;15(10):548–554. doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2005.08.007. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
5. Murcha MW, Wang Y, Narsai R, Whelan J. The plant mitochondrial protein import apparatus—the differences make it interesting. BBA Gen Subj. 2014;1840(4):1233–1245. doi: 10.1016/j.bbagen.2013.09.026. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
6. Unseld M, Marienfeld JR, Brandt P, Brennicke A. The mitochondrial genome of Arabidopsis thaliana contains 57 genes in 366,924 nucleotides. Nature Genet. 1997;15(1):57–61. doi: 10.1038/ng0197-57. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
7. Liu G, Cao D, Li S, Su A, Geng J, Grover CE, et al. The complete mitochondrial genome of Gossypium hirsutum and evolutionary analysis of higher plant mitochondrial genomes. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(8):e69476. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0069476. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
8. Bullerwell CE, Gray MW. Evolution of the mitochondrial genome: protist connections to animals, fungi and plants. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2004;7(5):528–534. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2004.08.008. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
9. Ward BL, Anderson RS, Bendich AJ. The mitochondrial genome is large and variable in a family of plants (cucurbitaceae) Cell. 1981;25(3):793–803. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(81)90187-2. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
10. Backert S, Borner T. Phage T4-like intermediates of DNA replication and recombination in the mitochondria of the higher plant Chenopodium album (L.) Curr Genet. 2000;37(5):304–314. doi: 10.1007/s002940050532. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
11. Marienfeld J, Unseld M, Brennicke A. The mitochondrial genome of Arabidopsis is composed of both native and immigrant information. Trends Plant Sci. 1999;4(12):495–502. doi: 10.1016/S1360-1385(99)01502-2. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
12. Sloan DB, Alverson AJ, Chuckalovcak JP, Wu M, McCauley DE, Palmer JD, et al. Rapid evolution of enormous, multichromosomal genomes in flowering plant mitochondria with exceptionally high mutation rates. PLoS Biol. 2012;10(1):e1001241. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001241. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
13. Linke B, Borner T. Mitochondrial effects on flower and pollen development. Mitochondrion. 2005;5(6):389–402. doi: 10.1016/j.mito.2005.10.001. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
14. Holec S, Lange H, Canaday J, Gagliardi D. Coping with cryptic and defective transcripts in plant mitochondria. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2008;1779(9):566–573. doi: 10.1016/j.bbagrm.2008.02.004. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
15. Filee J, Forterre P. Viral proteins functioning in organelles: a cryptic origin? Trends Microbiol. 2005;13(11):510–513. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2005.08.012. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
16. Hedtke B, Wagner I, Borner T, Hess WR. Inter-organellar crosstalk in higher plants: impaired chloroplast development affects mitochondrial gene and transcript levels. Plant J. 1999;19(6):635–643. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313x.1999.00554.x. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
17. Hess WR, Borner T. Organellar RNA polymerases of higher plants. Int Rev Cytol. 1999;190:1–59. doi: 10.1016/S0074-7696(08)62145-2. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
18. Farre JC, Araya A. Gene expression in isolated plant mitochondria: high fidelity of transcription, splicing and editing of a transgene product in electroporated organelles. Nucleic Acids Res. 2001;29(12):2484–2491. doi: 10.1093/nar/29.12.2484. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
19. Ott M, Prestele M, Bauerschmitt H, Funes S, Bonnefoy N, Herrmann JM. Mba1, a membrane-associated ribosome receptor in mitochondria. EMBO J. 2006;25(8):1603–1610. doi: 10.1038/sj.emboj.7601070. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
20. Szyrach G, Ott M, Bonnefoy N, Neupert W, Herrmann JM. Ribosome binding to the Oxa1 complex facilitates co-translational protein insertion in mitochondria. EMBO J. 2003;22(24):6448–6457. doi: 10.1093/emboj/cdg623. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
21. Kawaguchi R, Bailey-Serres J. Regulation of translational initiation in plants. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2002;5(5):460–465. doi: 10.1016/S1369-5266(02)00290-X. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
22. Tzamarias D, Roussou I, Thireos G. Coupling of GCN4 mRNA translational activation with decreased rates of polypeptide chain initiation. Cell. 1989;57(6):947–954. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90333-4. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
23. Kuriyama Y, Luck DJ. Membrane-associated ribosomes in mitochondria of Neurospora crassa. J Cell Biol. 1973;59(3):776–784. doi: 10.1083/jcb.59.3.776. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
24. Liu M, Spremulli L. Interaction of mammalian mitochondrial ribosomes with the inner membrane. J Biol Chem. 2000;275(38):29400–29406. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M002173200. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
25. Topping JF, Leaver CJ. Mitochondrial gene-expression during wheat leaf development. Planta. 1990;182(3):399–407. doi: 10.1007/BF02411391. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
26. Cahoon AB, Takacs EM, Sharpe RM, Stern DB. Nuclear, chloroplast, and mitochondrial transcript abundance along a maize leaf developmental gradient. Plant Mol Biol. 2008;66(1–2):33–46. doi: 10.1007/s11103-007-9250-z. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
27. Li XQ, Zhang MD, Brown GG. Cell-specific expression of mitochondrial transcripts in maize seedlings. Plant Cell. 1996;8(11):1961–1975. doi: 10.1105/tpc.8.11.1961. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
28. Khanam SM, Naydenov NG, Kadowaki K, Nakamura C. Mitochondrial biogenesis as revealed by mitochondrial transcript profiles during germination and early seedling growth in wheat. Genes Genet Syst. 2007;82(5):409–420. doi: 10.1266/ggs.82.409. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
29. Finnegan PM, Brown GG. Transcriptional and post-transcriptional regulation of RNA levels in maize mitochondria. Plant Cell. 1990;2(1):71–83. doi: 10.1105/tpc.2.1.71. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
30. Mulligan RM, Leon P, Walbot V. Transcriptional and posttranscriptional regulation of maize mitochondrial gene expression. Mol Cell Biol. 1991;11(1):533–543. doi: 10.1128/MCB.11.1.533. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
31. Giege P, Hoffmann M, Binder S, Brennicke A. RNA degradation buffers asymmetries of transcription in Arabidopsis mitochondria. EMBO Rep. 2000;1(2):164–170. doi: 10.1093/embo-reports/kvd024. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
32. Okada S, Brennicke A. Transcript levels in plant mitochondria show a tight homeostasis during day and night. Mol Genet Genomics. 2006;276(1):71–78. doi: 10.1007/s00438-006-0119-7. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
33. Zubo YO, Potapova TV, Yamburenko MV, Tarasenko VI, Konstantinov YM, Borner T. Inhibition of the electron transport strongly affects transcription and transcript levels in Arabidopsis mitochondria. Mitochondrion. 2014;19(2):222–30. [PubMed]
34. Law SR, Narsai R, Taylor NL, Delannoy E, Carrie C, Giraud E, et al. Nucleotide and RNA metabolism prime translational initiation in the earliest events of mitochondrial biogenesis during Arabidopsis germination. Plant Physiol. 2012;158(4):1610–1627. doi: 10.1104/pp.111.192351. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
35. Kwasniak M, Majewski P, Skibior R, Adamowicz A, Czarna M, Sliwinska E, et al. Silencing of the nuclear RPS10 gene encoding mitochondrial ribosomal protein alters translation in Arabidopsis mitochondria. Plant Cell. 2013;25(5):1855–1867. doi: 10.1105/tpc.113.111294. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
36. Giege P, Sweetlove LJ, Cognat V, Leaver CJ. Coordination of nuclear and mitochondrial genome expression during mitochondrial biogenesis in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2005;17(5):1497–1512. doi: 10.1105/tpc.104.030254. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
37. Yang AJ, Mulligan RM. Distribution of maize mitochondrial transcripts in polysomal RNA: evidence for non-selectivity in recruitment of mRNAs. Curr Genet. 1993;23(5–6):532–536. doi: 10.1007/BF00312647. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
38. Newton KJ, Walbot V. Maize mitochondria synthesize organ-specific polypeptides. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1985;82(20):6879–6883. doi: 10.1073/pnas.82.20.6879. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
39. Dai H, Lo YS, Charn CG, Ruddat M, Chiang KS. Characterization of protein-synthesis by isolated rice mitochondria. Theor Appl Genet. 1993;86(2–3):312–316. [PubMed]
40. Hahn M, Walbot V. Effects of cold-treatment on protein synthesis and mRNA levels in rice leaves. Plant Physiol. 1989;91(3):930–938. doi: 10.1104/pp.91.3.930. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
41. Lind C, Hallden C, Moller IM. Protein synthesis in mitochondria purified from roots, leaves and flowers of sugar beet. Physiol Plant. 1991;83:7–16. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3054.1991.tb01274.x. [Cross Ref]
42. De Paepe R, Forchioni A, Chetrit P, Vedel F. Specific mitochondrial proteins in pollen: presence of an additional ATP synthase beta subunit. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1993;90(13):5934–5938. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.13.5934. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
43. Conley CA, Hanson MR. Tissue-specific protein expression in plant mitochondria. Plant Cell. 1994;6(1):85–91. doi: 10.1105/tpc.6.1.85. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
44. Nebiolo CM, White EM. Corn mitochondrial protein synthesis in response to heat shock. Plant Physiol. 1985;79(4):1129–1132. doi: 10.1104/pp.79.4.1129. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
45. Newton KJ, Walbot V. Molecular analysis of mitochondria from a fertility restorer line of maize. Plant Mol Biol. 1985;4(4):247–252. doi: 10.1007/BF02418243. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
46. Smits P, Smeitink J, van den Heuvel L. Mitochondrial translation and beyond: processes implicated in combined oxidative phosphorylation deficiencies. J Biomed Biotechnol. 2010;2010:737385. doi: 10.1155/2010/737385. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
47. Towpik J. Regulation of mitochondrial translation in yeast. Cell Mol Biol Lett. 2005;10(4):571–594. [PubMed]
48. Binder S, Marchfelder A, Brennicke A. Regulation of gene expression in plant mitochondria. Plant Mol Biol. 1996;32(1–2):303–314. doi: 10.1007/BF00039387. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
49. Pring DR, Mullen JA, Kempken F. Conserved sequence blocks 5′ to start codons of plant mitochondrial genes. Plant Mol Biol. 1992;19(2):313–317. doi: 10.1007/BF00027353. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
50. Sugiyama Y, Watase Y, Nagase M, Makita N, Yagura S, Hirai A, et al. The complete nucleotide sequence and multipartite organization of the tobacco mitochondrial genome: comparative analysis of mitochondrial genomes in higher plants. Mol Genet Genomics. 2005;272(6):603–615. doi: 10.1007/s00438-004-1075-8. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
51. Southern E, Mir K, Shchepinov M. Molecular interactions on microarrays. Nat Genet. 1999;21:5–9. doi: 10.1038/4429. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
52. Seringhaus M, Rozowsky J, Royce T, Nagalakshmi U, Jee J, Snyder M, et al. Mismatch oligonucleotides in human and yeast: guidelines for probe design on tiling microarrays. BMC Genomics. 2008;9:635. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-9-635. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
53. Kahlau S, Bock R. Plastid transcriptomics and translatomics of tomato fruit development and chloroplast-to-chromoplast differentiation: chromoplast gene expression largely serves the production of a single protein. Plant Cell. 2008;20(4):856–874. doi: 10.1105/tpc.107.055202. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
54. Azzam ME, Algranati ID. Mechanism of puromycin action: fate of ribosomes after release of nascent protein chains from polysomes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1973;70(12):3866–3869. doi: 10.1073/pnas.70.12.3866. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
55. del Prete MJ, Vernal R, Dolznig H, Mullner EW, Garcia-Sanz JA. Isolation of polysome-bound mRNA from solid tissues amenable for RT-PCR and profiling experiments. RNA. 2007;13(3):414–421. doi: 10.1261/rna.79407. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
56. Doyle JJ, Doyle JL. A rapid total DNA preparation procedure for fresh plant tissue. Focus. 1990;12:13–15.
57. Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual. 2. Cold Spring Harbor: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; 1989.
58. Church GM, Gilbert W. Genomic sequencing. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1984;81(7):1991–1995. doi: 10.1073/pnas.81.7.1991. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
59. Ramakers C, Ruijter JM, Deprez RH, Moorman AF. Assumption-free analysis of quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) data. Neurosci Lett. 2003;339(1):62–66. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3940(02)01423-4. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
60. Hedtke B, Legen J, Weihe A, Herrmann RG, Borner T. Six active phage-type RNA polymerase genes in Nicotiana tabacum. Plant J. 2002;30(6):625–637. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313X.2002.01318.x. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
61. Hedtke B, Borner T, Weihe A. Mitochondrial and chloroplast phage-type RNA polymerases in Arabidopsis. Science. 1997;277(5327):809–811. doi: 10.1126/science.277.5327.809. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
62. Hedtke B, Meixner M, Gillandt S, Richter E, Borner T, Weihe A. Green fluorescent protein as a marker to investigate targeting of organellar RNA polymerases of higher plants in vivo. Plant J. 1999;17(5):557–561. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313X.1999.00393.x. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
63. Saeed AI, Sharov V, White J, Li J, Liang W, Bhagabati N, et al. TM4: a free, open-source system for microarray data management and analysis. Biotechniques. 2003;34(2):374–378. [PubMed]
64. Ramirez-Aguilar SJ, Keuthe M, Rocha M, Fedyaev VV, Kramp K, Gupta KJ, et al. The composition of plant mitochondrial supercomplexes changes with oxygen availability. J Biol Chem. 2011;286(50):43045–43053. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111.252544. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
65. Kuroda H, Maliga P. Complementarity of the 16S rRNA penultimate stem with sequences downstream of the AUG destabilizes the plastid mRNAs. Nucleic Acids Res. 2001;29(4):970–975. doi: 10.1093/nar/29.4.970. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
66. Cahoon EB, Shanklin J, Ohlrogge JB. Expression of a coriander desaturase results in petroselinic acid production in transgenic tobacco. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1992;89(23):11184–11188. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.23.11184. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
67. Phreaner CG, Williams MA, Mulligan RM. Incomplete editing of rps12 transcripts results in the synthesis of polymorphic polypeptides in plant mitochondria. Plant Cell. 1996;8(1):107–117. doi: 10.1105/tpc.8.1.107. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
68. Williams MA, Tallakson WA, Phreaner CG, Mulligan RM. Editing and translation of ribosomal protein S13 transcripts: unedited translation products are not detectable in maize mitochondria. Curr Genet. 1998;34(3):221–226. doi: 10.1007/s002940050390. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
69. Sanchirico ME, Fox TD, Mason TL. Accumulation of mitochondrially synthesized Saccharomyces cerevisiae Cox2p and Cox3p depends on targeting information in untranslated portions of their mRNAs. EMBO J. 1998;17(19):5796–5804. doi: 10.1093/emboj/17.19.5796. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
70. Kane MD, Jatkoe TA, Stumpf CR, Lu J, Thomas JD, Madore SJ. Assessment of the sensitivity and specificity of oligonucleotide (50mer) microarrays. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000;28(22):4552–4557. doi: 10.1093/nar/28.22.4552. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
71. Rhee SK, Liu X, Wu L, Chong SC, Wan X, Zhou J. Detection of genes involved in biodegradation and biotransformation in microbial communities by using 50-mer oligonucleotide microarrays. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2004;70(7):4303–4317. doi: 10.1128/AEM.70.7.4303-4317.2004. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
72. He Z, Wu L, Li X, Fields MW, Zhou J. Empirical establishment of oligonucleotide probe design criteria. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005;71(7):3753–3760. doi: 10.1128/AEM.71.7.3753-3760.2005. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
73. Bozdech Z, Zhu J, Joachimiak MP, Cohen FE, Pulliam B, DeRisi JL. Expression profiling of the schizont and trophozoite stages of Plasmodium falciparum with a long-oligonucleotide microarray. Genome Biol. 2003;4(2):R9. doi: 10.1186/gb-2003-4-2-r9. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
74. He Z, Wu L, Fields MW, Zhou J. Use of microarrays with different probe sizes for monitoring gene expression. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005;71(9):5154–5162. doi: 10.1128/AEM.71.9.5154-5162.2005. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
75. Stegeman WJ, Cooper CS, Avers CJ. Physical characterization of ribosomes from purified mitochondria of yeast. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1970;39(1):69–76. doi: 10.1016/0006-291X(70)90759-X. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
76. Bunn CL, Mitchell CH, Lukins HB, Linnane AW. Biogenesis of mitochondria. 18. A new class of cytoplasmically determined antibiotic resistant mutants in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1970;67(3):1233–1240. doi: 10.1073/pnas.67.3.1233. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
77. Borst P, Grivell LA. Mitochondrial ribosomes. FEBS Lett. 1971;13(2):73–88. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(71)80204-1. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
78. Cremel G, Filliol D, Jancsik V, Rendon A. Cholesterol distribution in rat liver and brain mitochondria as determined by stopped-flow kinetics with filipin. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1990;278(1):142–147. doi: 10.1016/0003-9861(90)90242-Q. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
79. Dorbani L, Jancsik V, Linden M, Leterrier JF, Nelson BD, Rendon A. Subfractionation of the outer membrane of rat brain mitochondria: evidence for the existence of a domain containing the porin–hexokinase complex. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1987;252(1):188–196. doi: 10.1016/0003-9861(87)90023-3. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
80. Hochman J, Ferguson-Miller S, Schindler M. Mobility in the mitochondrial electron transport chain. Biochemistry. 1985;24(10):2509–2516. doi: 10.1021/bi00331a017. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
81. Grimes BT, Sisay AK, Carroll HD, Cahoon AB. Deep sequencing of the tobacco mitochondrial transcriptome reveals expressed ORFs and numerous editing sites outside coding regions. BMC Genomics. 2014;15:31. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-15-31. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
82. Moneger F, Smart CJ, Leaver CJ. Nuclear restoration of cytoplasmic male sterility in sunflower is associated with the tissue-specific regulation of a novel mitochondrial gene. EMBO J. 1994;13(1):8–17. [PubMed]
83. Moneger F, Mandaron P, Niogret MF, Freyssinet G, Mache R. Expression of chloroplast and mitochondrial genes during microsporogenesis in maize. Plant Physiol. 1992;99(2):396–400. doi: 10.1104/pp.99.2.396. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
84. Kuroiwa T, Fujie M. Studies on the behavior of mitochondrial-DNA—synthesis of mitochondrial-dna occurs actively in a specific region just above the quiescent center in the root-meristem of Pelargonium-Zonale. J Cell Sci. 1992;101:483–493.
85. Day DA, Neuburger M, Douce R. Biochemical characterization of chlorophyll-free mitochondria from pea leaves. Aust J Plant Physiol. 1985;12:219–228. doi: 10.1071/PP9850219. [Cross Ref]
86. Deana A, Belasco JG. Lost in translation: the influence of ribosomes on bacterial mRNA decay. Genes Dev. 2005;19(21):2526–2533. doi: 10.1101/gad.1348805. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
87. Gualberto JM, Le Ret M, Beator B, Kuhn K. The RAD52-like protein ODB1 is required for the efficient excision of two mitochondrial introns spliced via first-step hydrolysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015;43(13):6500–6510. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkv540. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
88. Sultan LD, Mileshina D, Grewe F, Rolle K, Abudraham S, Glodowicz P, et al. The reverse transcriptase/RNA maturase protein MatR is required for the splicing of various group II introns in brassicaceae mitochondria. Plant Cell. 2016;28(11):2805–2829. doi: 10.1105/tpc.16.00398. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
89. Labouesse M, Netter P, Schroeder R. Molecular basis of the ‘box effect’, A maturase deficiency leading to the absence of splicing of two introns located in two split genes of yeast mitochondrial DNA. Eur J Biochem. 1984;144(1):85–93. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1984.tb08434.x. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
90. Begu D, Graves PV, Domec C, Arselin G, Litvak S, Araya A. RNA editing of wheat mitochondrial ATP synthase subunit 9: direct protein and cDNA sequencing. Plant Cell. 1990;2(12):1283–1290. doi: 10.1105/tpc.2.12.1283. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
91. Lu B, Hanson MR. A single homogeneous form of ATP6 protein accumulates in petunia mitochondria despite the presence of differentially edited atp6 transcripts. Plant Cell. 1994;6(12):1955–1968. doi: 10.1105/tpc.6.12.1955. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
92. Grohmann L, Thieck O, Herz U, Schroder W, Brennicke A. Translation of nad9 mRNAs in mitochondria from Solanum tuberosum is restricted to completely edited transcripts. Nucleic Acids Res. 1994;22(16):3304–3311. doi: 10.1093/nar/22.16.3304. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]

Articles from Plant Methods are provided here courtesy of BioMed Central