PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of oncotargetLink to Publisher's site
 
Oncotarget. 2017 November 21; 8(59): 99816–99824.
Published online 2017 September 16. doi:  10.18632/oncotarget.21071
PMCID: PMC5725133

R383C mutation of human CDC20 results in idiopathic non-obstructive azoospermia

Abstract

Idiopathic azoospermia (IA) is a severe form of male infertility due to unknown causes. To investigate relative gene expression in human idiopathic non-obstructive azoospermia, we sequenced all the exons of cell division cycle 20 (CDC20) in 766 patients diagnosed with IA, as well as in 521 normally fertile men. Three novel missense mutations (S72G, R322Q, R383C) of CDC20 were detected and further confirmed by Sanger sequencing. The mRNA levels of securin, cyclin B, cyclin dependent kinase 1 (CDK1), and cyclin dependent kinase 2 (CDK2), which are all targeted for destruction via the anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosomeCDC20 (APC/CCDC20) pathway, were detected at relatively high levels using real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction analysis. This demonstrated that the CDC20 R383C mutation led to dysfunction during the transition from metaphase to anaphase and facilitation of mitotic exit in vitro, and caused prolonged mitotic arrest during the cell cycle. This study suggests that a CDC20 R383C mutation may result in the pathogenesis of human IA.

Keywords: CDC20, CDC20 R383C mutant, Idiopathic azoospermia (IA)

INTRODUCTION

Approximately 15% of all couples suffer from fertility problems, and male infertility contributes to 30%-50% of these cases [15]. Genetic defects cause about 15%-30% of male infertility [4], with a quarter of those due to azoospermia. Obstructive disease makes up 30% of azoospermia, while the other 70% is idiopathic non-obstructive azoospermia (IA) [36].

Normal mitosis and differentiation can be influenced by genetic defects that are linked to physiological sperm function, which may result in spermatogenic obstacles and/or azoospermia. The causes of azoospermia can be multifactorial. Matzuk et al listed about 50 genes that are closely related to azoospermia, however CDC20 was excluded from the list [7]. CDC20 is a critical protein activation factor in the cell cycle, which was first confirmed in the S. cerevisiae’s cell reproductive cycle [8]. Human CDC20 homology, p55CDC, was first documented by Weinstein et al in 1994 [9]. The gene is located in human chromosome 1q34.1, and the nucleotide sequence includes 11 exons and 10 introns and codes 499 amino acids [910].

Anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome (APC/C) is a multi-component ubiquitin ligase, which stimulates the progression of mitosis via proteolysis of several key cell cycle protein substrates. Genetic and biochemical investigations have shown that CDC20 can adhere to APC/C in mitosis, forming a large complex APC/CCDC20. The complex then activates the APC/C substrates, degrades securin and cyclin B via 26S proteasome, separates sister-chromatids, and promotes the normal transition from metaphase to anaphase. Besides securin and cyclin B, CDK1 and CDK2 should be also decreased before anaphase [8, 1112].

Our recent work identified three novel missense mutations of four mutations in CDC20 from six IA patients with exome sequencing, which led us to investigate and evaluate the physiological effects of mutational forms of CDC20 in cell division.

RESULTS

Identification of CDC20 mutation in patients with IA

To examine whether CDC20 genetic defects were associated with IA, we sequenced CDC20 exonic mutations in 766 IA patients and 521 normal men. Three novel CDC20 missense mutations were detected in six patients, and they were absent in the normal controls (Table (Table1).1). Three novel missense mutations had not been reported in either the dbSNP135 database or the 1000 Genome Project dataset. All these novel missense mutations were further confirmed by Sanger sequencing (Figure (Figure1A).1A). Alignment of the amino acid sequence of CDC20 to its orthologs in different species showed that the R383C mutation affected a highly conserved amino acid (Figure (Figure1B1B).

Table 1
CDC20 mutations and SNPs identified in IA patients and fertile men
Figure 1
Three missense mutations of CDC20 identified in patients with IA

Flow cytometry analysis of Hela and 293T cells transfected with CDC20 mutants

After the CDC20 R383C mutant was transfected into the cells, the G2/M cell ratio increased compared to those cells transfected with wild type (WT) or the other two CDC20 mutants (S72G or R322Q). Our data demonstrated that both the R383C mutant and the co-expression of R383C mutant and WT can cause prolonged cell arrest in the G2/M stage of the cell cycle (Figure (Figure3,3, ,4).4). This in turn leads to the lower ratio of G0/G1 cells (Figure (Figure5).5). This suggested that the CDC20 R383C mutant could block cells from metaphase to anaphase.

Figure 3
Flow cytometric analysis of HeLa cells transfected with the CDC20 mutant
Figure 4
Flow cytometric analysis of 293T cells transfected with the CDC20 mutant
Figure 5
Cell count comparison in the cell cycle measured by flow cytometry in six cell lines between Hela and 293T cells

Relative mRNA expression level of four regulators of APC/CCDC20 mutant pathway

We detected the mRNA expression of securin, cyclin B, CDK1, and CDK2 after three CDC20 mutants were transfected into the cells. Our data indicated the levels of the four key proteins in APC/CCDC20 R383C mutant pathway, which facilitate the progression of mitosis, were highly expressed when compared with WT or the other two CDC20 mutants (S72G, R322Q) (Figure (Figure2).2). High securin and cyclin B mRNA expression may induce cell arrest.

Figure 2
Relative mRNA expression of four proteins of interest in APC/CCDC20 mutant pathway in HeLa and 293T cells

Dominant-negative effects of CDC20 R383C mutant

To mimic patient heterozygosity, CDC20 R383C mutants and CDC20 WT were co-transfected into the cells. Again, the mRNA expression of four regulators increased after transfection of the CDC20 R383C mutant (Figure (Figure6).6). These results indicated that the CDC20 R383C mutant can inhibit the transcriptional regulation activities of CDC20 WT through a dominant-negative effect. It can also suppress the degradation of other APC/C inhibitors, causing prolonged cell arrest.

Figure 6
Histogram of four kinds of regulators of relative mRNA expression under dominant-negative effects of CDC20 R383C mutant

DISCUSSION

In this study, we identified three novel missense mutations of CDC20 in six IA patients. Among three mutations, only CDC20 R383C mutant was found in one of the 766 patients but absent in 521 fertile men. CDC20 R383C mutant resulted in heterozygous amino acid change at a conserved position. Arginine residue was replaced by cysteine residue in the R383C mutant, and the local alignment analysis of the amino acid sequences of CDC20 by MegAlign software suite suggests that the arginine residue was highly conserved in multiple vertebrates.

The evolutionary preservation of the entire region around this residue across multiple mammalian species indicated that mutations in this conservative region may have great influence on the CDC20 protein function. Our work indicates that the CDC20 R383C mutation can cause prolonged mitotic arrest in the cell cycle.

CDC20 promotes the destruction of securin and cyclin B that belong to the major substrates of APC/CCDC20, and trigger the separation of sister chromatids [8, 1112]. During the cell cycle, the highest level of CDC20 protein occurs at the G2/M stage [13], which is enough to trigger the transition from metaphase to anaphase and maintain cellular division. Our study indicated that the ratio of those cells expressed with CDC20 R383C mutant and CDC20 R383C mutant co-transfected with CDC20 WT staying in G2/M phase was higher than other types of cells (Figure (Figure5).5). With normal APC/CCDC20, securin and cyclin B should be degraded, and CDK1 and CDK2 should be inactivated [8]. Real-Time PCR analysis indicated the mRNA levels of securin, cyclin B, CDK1, and CDK2 remained high in cells with the CDC20 R383C mutant (Figure (Figure2),2), which caused mitotic arrest in the cell cycle. Our results also demonstrated that the CDC20 R383C mutation not only led to a dysfunctional physiological effect during the cell cycle, but also had a dominant-negative effect on the WT allele, which may be the cause of the phenotypic effect of the heterozygous mutation in IA patients.

CDC20 dysfunction can cause prolonged mitotic arrest and apoptosis in cells, which suggests it could be a therapeutic target in cancer research [14]. Inactive CDC20 can cause infertility in male mice without hurting overall health and viability [15]. The molecular and cellular investigations confirmed that CDC20 R383C mutant could cause mitotic arrest in cell cycle. Our study also suggested that functional analysis of the genetic mutations may provide insights into a potential mechanism and feasible treatment of IA.

This study had a few limitations. As CDC20 is expressed in many tissues, it is unacceptable that a healthy individual with almost normal clinical characteristics except for IA carries CDC20 R383C mutant that can cause prolonged mitotic arrest and apoptosis in cells. The sample size of patients with the CDC20 R383C mutant is small, and individuals can reflect genetic heterogeneity. Secondly, it is well known that the gene expression presents continual spatio-temporal dynamics in the entire life span [16]. Because differential mitotic checkpoint mechanisms are required between the germ and somatic cells [17], the cellular pathogenic effect of the CDC20 R383C mutant might only affect germ cells, not somatic cells. Lastly, competition at the protein level may also cause a cell cycle delay. Despite these limitations, our results suggest that a CDC20 R383C mutation may result in idiopathic azoospermia.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sample preparation

From Jan 2007 to Oct 2011, DNA samples of 766 male patients with idiopathic azoospermia aged 24-46 years (average 30.6) were collected from the Center of Reproductive Medicine, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science & Technology. The samples that met the following criteria were included: (1) no sperm detected by microscope in the centrifugation pellets of semen samples at three different occasions, (2) no obstruction, inflammation, or injury of the reproductive system or pelvic cavity, (3) no endocrinological defect, and (4) no karyotypic abnormality and gene microdeletion in Y chromosome. Normal DNA samples of 521 men aged 29-51 years (average 39.6) were recruited from the Center of Physical Examination, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital as control. These normal people were proven fertility owing at least one child without any assisted reproductive techniques (ART) such as artificial insemination by donor (AID), in vitro fertilization (IVF), or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). All the sample collection and experiments were approved by the Ethics Committee of Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science & Technology and Peking University Shenzhen Hospital. Informed written consent was obtained from all patients [18]. A large scale and parallel exome sequencing including candidate genes linked to male reproductive system were detected in the two groups. Dozens of target genes were screened from the IA patients according to the relative known gene data bank [18].

Validation of missense mutations

Sample preparation and exome sequencing have been or will be accomplished and published elsewhere [18]. To validate the three novel missense mutations of CDC20, Sanger sequencing was performed by 3730 DNA analyzer (Applied Biosystems, Carlsbad, CA, USA). The corresponding primer sequences for PCR and Sanger sequencing were listed in Table Table22.

Table 2
Primers used for PCR and Sanger sequencing validation of CDC20 gene

Construction of Plasmids via site-directed mutagenesis

Three novel validated missense mutations (S72G, R322Q, R383C) of CDC20 were generated by site-directed mutagenesis in the full length cDNA sequence, as inserted into pcDNA3.1+ (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) and co-expressed with plasmids respectively. The induced mutation sequences were verified by Sanger sequencing. Primers used for site-directed mutagenesis construction are shown in Table Table33.

Table 3
Primers used for site-directed mutagenesis construction

Cell culture, transfection, and flow cytometry

HeLa cells and 293T cells (ATCC, Manassas, VA, USA) were cultured in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium (Gibco BRL, Gaithersburg, MD, USA) supplemented with 10% (v/v) fetal bovine serum (FBS). They were incubated at 37°C in a 5% CO2 humidified incubator, and seeded in 6-well tissue culture plates 24 h prior to transfection. Transfection was performed using Lipofectaminen 2000 (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) according to the supplier's instructions. Equivalent amounts (4 μg) of pcDNA3.1+CDC20 plasmid expression system (WT and mutant) or pcDNA3.1+ empty vector were added into one well consisting of 4 ×106 million cells, including 5 μL Lipofectaminen 2000 solution. Cells were harvested 48 h after transfection and then were used for DNA content analysis by flow cytometry (Beckman, Brea, CA, USA).

Cells were re-suspended in cold PBS after centrifugation at 1200 g for 5 min, then the supernatant was discarded, and the cells were fixed by drop-wise addition of cold 100% ethanol with gentle vortex. After fixation, the cells were re-suspended in 70% ethanol (30% PBS) and stored at 4 °C overnight, washed again with PBS, digested in RNase A (Takara, Dalian, Japan) (50 μg/ml) solution for 30 min in 37°C water bath, and stained with propidium iodide (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) (50 μg/ml). Samples of 10,000 cells were analyzed by the Cell Quest software (Becton–Dickinson, Hercules, CA, USA).

RNA extraction and real-time PCR

Total RNAs were extracted from HeLa cells and 293T cells using the TRIzol (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The first-strand cDNA was synthesized using oligo-dT primers (K1622, Fermentas, Waltham, MA, USA). Primers used for Real-time PCR were listed in Table Table4.4. The PCR was performed at 98 °C for 2 min, 30 cycles of 98 °C for 10 s, 55 °C for 30 s, and 72 °C for 30 s, with a final 72 °C for 5 min. Real-time PCR was performed using the SYBR® Premix EX Taq™ II PCR Kit (RR820A, Takara, Dalian, Japan) according to the manufacturer’s instructions on the Roche Light-cycler 480 Real-Time PCR System (Roche, Rotkreuz, Switzerland). Data were calculated according to the Applied Biosystems comparative Ct method.

Table 4
Primers used for RT-PCR

Statistical analysis

All experiments were repeated at least three times. Statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism Version 5.0 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA). Values were expressed as mean ± SD, with P value < 0.05 considered statistically significant.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS AND FUNDING

The authors are appreciative to other researchers, whose names were not included in the author list, but who participated in this program. We also thank our patients and control individuals for their participation.

This work was funded by the National Key Basic Research Program of China (973 Program) (2014CB745201), National Natural Science Foundation of China (81402103, 81270686), International S&T Cooperation program of China (ISTCP) (2014DFA31050), the Chinese High-Tech (863) Program (2014AA020607), The National Science Foundation Projects of Guangdong Province (2014A030313717), the Shenzhen Municipal Government of China (ZDSYS20150430172217, JCYJ20150330102720130, GJHZ20150316154912494), and Special Support Funds of Shenzhen for Introduced High-Level Medical Team.

Contributed by

Author contributions

Lingwei Li performed the research and wrote the paper; Liqing Fan supervised and directed the whole workflow; Nanni Peng and Lihua Yang analyzed and interpreted the data; Lisha Mou and Weiren Huang supervised the laboratory work. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

None of the authors have any potential conflicts of interest in this work.

REFERENCES

1. Hu ZB, Xia YK, Guo XJ, Dai JC, Li HG, Hu HL, Jiang Y, Lu F, Wu YB, Yang XY, Li HZ, Yao B, Lu CC, et al. A genome-wide association study in Chinese men identifies three risk loci for non-obstructive azoospermia. Nat Genet. 2012;44:183–6. [PubMed]
2. Bashamboo A, Ferraz-de-Souza B, Lourenco D, Lin L, Sebire NJ, Montjean D, Bignon-Topalovic J, Mandelbaum J, Siffroi JP, Christin-Maitre S, Radhakrishna U, Rouba H, Ravel C, et al. Human male infertility associated with mutations in NR5A1 encoding steroidogenic factor 1. Am J Hum Genet. 2012;87:505–12. [PubMed]
3. Ferlin A, Raicu F, Gatta V, Zuccarello D, Palka G, Foresta C. Male infertility: role of genetic background. Reprod Biomed Online. 2007;14:734–45. [PubMed]
4. O'Flynn O'Brien KL, Varghese AC, Agarwal A. The genetic causes of male factor infertility: A review. Fertil Steril. 2010;93:1–12. [PubMed]
5. Maduro MR, Lamb DJ. Understanding the new genetics of male infertility. J Urology. 2002;168:2197–2205. [PubMed]
6. Huynh T, Mollard R, Trounson A. Selected genetic factors associated with male infertility. Hum Reprod Update. 2002;8:183–98. [PubMed]
7. Matzuk MM, Lamb DJ. The biology of infertility: research advances and clinical challenges. Nat Med. 2008;14:1197–213. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
8. Yu HT. Cdc20: A WD40 Activator for a Cell Cycle Degradation Machine. Mol Cell. 2007;6:3–16. [PubMed]
9. Weinstein J, Jacobsen FW, Hsu-Chen J, Wu T, Baum LG. A Novel Mammalian Protein, p55CDC, Present in Dividing Cells Is Associated with Protein Kinase Activity and Has Homology to the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Cell Division Cycle Proteins Cdc20and Cdc4. Mol Cell Biol. 1994;5:3350–63. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
10. Weinstein J, Karim J, Geschwind DH, Nelson SF, Krumm J, Sakamoto KM. Genomic Organization, 5’ Flanking Enhancer Region, and Chromosomal Assignment of the Cell Cycle Gene, p55Cdc. Mol Genet Metab. 1998;64:52–7. [PubMed]
11. Baumgarten AJ, Felthaus J, Wäsch R. Strong inducible knockdown of APC/C Cdc20 does not cause mitotic arrest in human somatic cells. Cell Cycle. 2009;8:643–6. [PubMed]
12. Peters JM. The Anaphase-Promoting Complex: Proteolysis in Mitosis and Beyond. Mol Cell. 2002;9:931–43. [PubMed]
13. Fang GW, Yu HT, Kirschner MW. Direct Binding of CDC20 Protein Family Members Activates the Anaphase-Promoting Complex in Mitosis and G1. Mol Cell. 1998;2:163–71. [PubMed]
14. Tian W, Li B, Warrington R, Tomchickc DR, Yu HT, Luo XL. Structural analysis of human Cdc20 supports multisite degron recognition by APC/C. PNAS. 2012;109:18419–24. [PubMed]
15. Jin F, Hamada M, Malureanu L, Jeganathan KB, Zhou W, Morbeck DE, van Deursen JM. Cdc20 Is Critical for Meiosis I and Fertility of Female Mice. PLoS Genet. 2010;6:1–16. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
16. Naumova OY, Lee M, Rychkov SY, Vlasova NV, Grigorenko EL. Gene Expression in the Human Brain: The Current State of the Study of Specificity and Spatio-temporal Dynamics. Child Dev. 2013;84:76–88. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
17. Jeganathan KB, van Deursen JM. Differential mitotic checkpoint protein requirements in somatic and germ cells. Biochem Soc T. 2006;34:583–6. [PubMed]
18. Mou LS, Wang YD, Li HG, Huang Y, Jiang T, Huang WR, Li ZS, Chen J, Xie J, Liu YC, Jiang ZM, Li XX, Ye JX, et al. A dominant-negative mutation of HSF2 associated with idiopathic azoospermia. Hum Genet. 2013;132:159–65. [PubMed]

Articles from Oncotarget are provided here courtesy of Impact Journals, LLC