PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of medscimonISLHome PageSearch ArticleTable of ContentsSubmit ManuscriptSubscribe
 
Med Sci Monit. 2017; 23: 5735–5743.
Published online 2017 December 3. doi:  10.12659/MSM.904937
PMCID: PMC5724350

Identification of Key Genes in Colorectal Cancer Regulated by miR-34a

Tao Wang,1,A,B,C,D,E,F,G Haihe Xu,2,A,C,E,F,G Xianglong Liu,1,A,B,C,F,G Shuo Chen,3,A,B,F,G Yi Zhou,1,A,C,D,G and Xipeng Zhang3,A,B,C,E,G

Abstract

Background

The aim of this study was to screen the molecular targets of miR-34a in colorectal cancer (CRC) and construct the regulatory network, to gain more insights to the pathogenesis of CRC.

Material/Methods

The microarray data of CRC samples and normal samples (GSE4988), as well as CRC samples transformed with miR-34a and non-transfected CRC samples (GSE7754), were downloaded from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database. The differently expressed genes (DEGs) were identified via the LIMMA package in R language. The Database for Annotation, Visualization and Integrated Discovery (DAVID) was used to identify significant Gene Ontology (GO) terms and pathways in DEGs. The targets of miR-34a were obtained via the miRWalk database, and then the overlaps between them were selected out to construct the regulatory network of miR-34a in CRC using the Cytoscape software.

Results

A total of 392 DEGs were identified in CRC samples compared with normal samples, including 239 upregulated genes and 153 downregulated ones. These DEGs were enriched in 75 GO terms and one Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway. At the same time, 332 DEGs (188 upregulated and 144 downregulated) were screened out between miR-34a transformed CRC and miR-34a non-transfected CRC samples and they were enriched in 20 GO terms and eight KEGG pathways. Six overlapped genes were identified in two DEGs groups. There were 1,668 targets of miR-34a obtained via the miRWalk database, among which 21 were identified differently expressed in miR-34a transformed CRC samples compared with miR-34a non-transfected CRC samples. Two regulatory networks of miR-34a in CRC within these two groups of overlapped genes were constructed respectively.

Conclusions

Pathways related to cell cycle, DNA replication, oocyte meiosis, and pyrimidine metabolism might play critical roles in the progression of CRC. Several genes such as SERPINE1, KLF4, SEMA4B, PPARG, CDC45, and KIAA0101 might be the targets of miR-34a and the potential therapeutic targets of CRC.

MeSH Keywords: Colorectal Neoplasms, Microarray Analysis, MicroRNAs

Background

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer and the fourth-leading cause of cancer related death worldwide with an incidence of more than 1,000,000 per year [1,2]. According to statistics, the probability of developing CRC increases from 0.07% in the first four decades of life to 4.5–5% in the seventh decade of life [3,4]. Furthermore, studies suggest that 40–50% of patients who underwent potentially curative surgery ultimately relapsed and died of metastatic disease [5,6]. The most important prognostic indicator of survival in early CRC is the stage of the tumor determined by the depth of penetration through the bowel wall, and the number of involved lymph nodes [6]. However, the tumors are often diagnosed at an intermediate or late stage with poor prognosis, because of the complexity in medical diagnosis. In addition, pathological staging fails to predict recurrence accurately in many patients undergoing surgery for CRC. In fact, 10–20% patients with stage II CRC, and 30–40% of those with stage III CRC, develop recurrence [7]. It is crucial to explore the molecular mechanism and identify reliable biomarkers that can guide the diagnosis and therapy of CRC.

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are a class of endogenous small noncoding RNAs to regulate gene expression [8], and they were reported to be closely associated with cell growth, proliferation, differentiation, and death [9,10]. There has been increasing evidence indicating that microRNAs play important roles in the development of cancers [11], such as the proliferation, apoptosis, invasion, and metastasis of tumors [12,13]. MicroRNA-34a (miR-34a) is a pivotal member of the p53 network, and it was found to be downregulated in multiple types of tumors, including CRC [14], and often act as a tumor suppressor [1519]. Studies have shown that miR-34a regulated multiple developmental cell-fate mechanisms, including the differentiation of human embryonic stem cells and somatic cell reprogramming [16,20,21]. Furthermore, was it has also been suggested that miR-34a plays critical roles in inhibiting tumor recurrence [22]. However, the specific regulatory mechanism of miR-34a in CRC is still unclear.

In this study, we aimed to explore some key targets associated with the development of CRC. And our study might contribute to promoting available biomarkers for the early diagnosis, therapy, and prognosis of CRC.

Material and Methods

Microarray data

Microarray data set GSE4988 and GSE7754 were downloaded from the GEO (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/) database. The GSE4988 data set contained 20 samples: 12 CRC samples and eight normal samples. These microarray data were analyzed using the GPL3014 (ResGenHs15K_DIO) platform. The GSE7754 dataset contained four samples: two CRC samples transformed with miR-34a and two non-transfected CRC samples, and the data were analyzed based on GPL70 (HG-U133_Plus_2, Affymetrix Human Genome U133 Plus 2.0 Array) platform.

Data preprocessing and identification of DEGs

The raw data was background corrected, log2 transformed, and quantile normalized using Robust Multi-array Average (RMA). If multiple probes corresponded to one gene, the mean expression value was defined as expression value. LIMMA package in R language was used to analyze the DEGs in CRC samples compared to normal samples (regarded as DEGs-1), as well as CRC samples transformed with miR-34a compared to non-transfected CRC samples (regarded as DEGs-2). DEGs were obtained according to the criteria: adjusted p<0.05 and |log(fold change)| >1.

Functional enrichment analysis of DEGs

Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) analysis were commonly used approaches for functional and pathway studies of large-scale genomic or transcription data, respectively [23]. GO terms included biological processes (BP), molecular function (MF), and cellular component (CC). The Database for Annotation, Visualization and Integrated Discovery (DAVID) [24] (https://david.ncifcrf.gov/) was a widely used web-based tool for the functional annotation of DEGs. To investigate the bio-functions of DEGs, GO, and KEGG pathway analyses were conducted based on the online software DAVID with p<0.05.

Construction of the transcriptional regulatory network of miR-34a

MiRWalk (http://mirwalk.uni-hd.de/) is a publicly available comprehensive resource, hosting the predicted as well as the experimentally validated microRNA (miRNA)-target interaction pairs. The targets of miR-34a were identified based on the miRWalk database, and the overlapped genes between these targets and DEGs-2 were selected. Then the transcriptional regulatory network with miR-34a was constructed. At the same time, the overlapped genes between DEGs-1 and DEGs-2 were also selected to build the regulatory network with miR-34a.

Verification of related upregulated and downregulated genes

The expression levels of some DEGs were detected in colon cancer cell line HCT116 (observed by our laboratory) by RT-PCR. The culture of HCT116 and the retroviral expression of miR-34a referred to the methods of Chang et al. [25]. HCT116 cells transformed with miR-34a were named as miR-34a group, and non-transformed cells as the control group. Total RNA was isolated using TRIzol (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Approximately 1 μg of total RNA from each sample was subjected to reverse transcription by SuperScript II reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen, America). Reverse transcription was performed at 42°C for one hour, followed by 95°C for five minutes. Quantitative real-time PCR (Q-PCR) was performed to determine the mRNA levels of SERPINE1, KLF4, SEMA4B, PPARG, CDC45, and KIAA0101 using a SYBR® Premix Ex Taq™ Kit (TaKaRa, Shiga, Japan) according to the manufacturer’s instructions and an ABI Prism 7000 Sequence Detection System (Applied Biosystems, CA, USA). The amplification conditions were as follows: 95°C for five minutes; followed by 40 cycles of 95°C for 15 seconds, 60°C for 30 seconds, and 72°C for 35 seconds; and a final five minute 72°C extension. All the primers were designed and synthesized by Takara Biomedical Technology (Beijing) Co., Ltd. and they are shown in Table 1.

Table 1
Target genes and corresponding primer sets.

Statistical analysis

SPSS version 17.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) was used for all statistical analyses, and data were expressed as the mean ±SEM. The t-test was used to compare both two groups, and p values <0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results

Identification of DEGs

After data preprocessing, a total of 392 DEGs were identified in DEGs-1. Among these genes, 239 were upregulated and 153 were downregulated (Figure 1A). At the same time, the DEGs-2 set contained 332 DEGs (188 upregulated and 144 downregulated), and the top 20 DEGs of are shown in Figure 1B. The hierarchical clustering of DEGs in CRC samples, normal samples, miR-34a transformed CRC samples, and non-transfected CRC samples are shown in Figure 1C and 1D, respectively. The top 20 DEGs of DEGs-1 and DEGs-2 were separately listed in Table 2A and Table 2B.

Figure 1
The DEGs change trend (A, B) and hierarchical cluster analysis of samples (C, D) in the data set of GSE4988 (A, C) and GSE7754 (B, D). Colors in the heat map represent for different gene expression level. Based on DEGs-1, CRC samples and normal samples ...
Table 2A
The top 20 DEGs of CRC samples compared to normal samples.
Table 2B
The top 20 DEGs of miR-34a transformed CRC samples compared to miR-34a non-transfected CRC samples.

Function enrichment of DEGs

There were 75 enriched GO terms of DEGs-1 identified, including 49 biological processes (BP), 19 cellular component (CC) and seven molecular function (MF) terms. Then, one KEGG pathway related to basal transcription factors was obtained. In DEGs-2, 243 GO terms and eight KEGG pathways were obtained. The top 10 GO terms for DEGs-1 and DEGs-2 are shown in Figure 2. Table 3 shows the enriched KEGG pathways of DEGs-1 and DEGs-2.

Figure 2
The top 10 GO terms for which the DEGs-1 (A) and the DEGs-2 (B) were enriched.
Table 3
The enriched KEGG pathway for DEGs of CRC samples compared to normal samples, as well as DEGs of miR-34a transformed CRC samples compared to miR-34a non-transfected CRC samples.

Analysis of regulatory network of miR-34a in CRC

There were 1,668 target genes of miR-34a obtained via the miRWalk database, and 21 overlaps with DEGs-2 were identified, among which 11 genes (NTN4, KLF4, CEBPG, SEMA4B, PPARG, SERPINE1, C11orf38, FGD6, THBD, RTN1, and RRAGD) were downregulated. At the same time, six overlapped genes (KNTC1, CDC45, HAT1, DLGAP5, KIAA0101, and FAM64A) were identified in the DEGs-1 and DEGs-2. Figure 3 shows the regulatory network between miR-34a and these overlapped genes.

Figure 3
Regulatory network between miR-34a and the overlapped DEGs. Genes in A were the overlaps between DEGs-2 and the targets of miR-34a, well genes in B were the overlaps between DEGs-1 and DEGs-2.

Verification of important genes

Several genes such as SERPINE1 (downregulated), KLF4 (downregulated), SEMA4B (downregulated), PPARG (downregulated), CDC45 (upregulated) and KIAA0101 (upregulated) might be the targets of miR-34a. Results of RT-PCR are shown in Figure 4, which verified the related upregulated and downregulation of the aforementioned DEGs in CRC cells transformed with miR-34a compared with those non-transfected cells.

Figure 4
The mRNA expression levels of ERPINE1, KLF4, SEMA4B, PPARG, CDC45 and KIAA0101 in miR-34a group and control group. * meant p<0.05, *** meant p<0.001.

Discussion

Despite advances in technologies of detection and therapies, CRC is still an uncontrollable disease. The lifetime risk of developing CRC is about 5.1% [26]. In the United States, CRC accounts for approximately 10% of cancer cases and cancer-related deaths [4]. MiR-34a was found to be a tumor suppressor in various cancers. In our study, DEGs, GO terms, and KEGG pathways in CRC samples and miR-34a transformed CRC samples were identified. Through the construction of the regulatory network of miR-34a, key genes in the progression of CRC were obtained, which might help make better understanding of the molecular mechanism and provide important reference for the diagnosis and therapy of CRC.

GO functional enrichment analysis indicated that both DEGs-1 and DEGs-2 were enriched in cell differentiation and cell cycle related biological processes. These processes were reported to be closely related to cancers. The majority of human cells were not cycling, while the minority of cells were cycling and were mainly located in self-renewing tissues. Deregulation of the cell cycle under laid the aberrant cell proliferation that characterized cancer [27], and tumor cells could not receive sufficient mitogenic signaling to drive them through the cycle and the division. At the same time, cell cycle phases could also be prognostic markers and therapy targets in various of cancers [28,29]. DEGs-2 has also been shown to be related to the biosynthesis of proteins and some other substances. Studies have shown that the rate of protein synthesis was a key factor affecting the protein folding in endoplasmic reticulum (ER), and the proteins misfolding in ER involved in the process of various of cancers [30]. Furthermore, protein synthesis was a significant process of metabolism and was closely related to many biological processes, such as cell cycle and cell differentiation. Studies showed that inhibition of mitochondrial protein synthesis lead to the lack of oxidative ATP generating capacity, which resulted in proliferation arrest of normal and malignant cells [31]. KEGG enrichment analysis showed that these DEGs were mainly related to cell cycle related pathway, pyrimidine metabolism related pathway, oocyte meiosis related pathway and DNA replication related pathway. Overall, they were all associated with cell growth, cell invasion, cell proliferation, and cell cycle, all of which play critical roles in the process of tumorigenesis [32]. Research has shown that miR-34a suppress tumors and inhibits recurrence of CRC through inhibiting cell growth, migration, and invasion, inducing cell apoptosis and cell cycle arrest [22,33]. Several target genes involved in these processes have been reported to be regulated by miR-34a so as to affect the pathogenetic process of CRC, such as SIRT1 and NOTCH1 [16,34]. The GO terms and KEGG pathways obtained in our study were in accordance with these other studies and indicated the function of miR-34a in regulating the progression of CRC.

There were 21 overlapped genes identified in DEGs-2 and the targets of miR-34a, among which 11 genes were downregulated in miR-34a transformed CRC samples, including NTN4, KLF4, CEBPG, SEMA4B, PPARG, SERPINE1, C11orf38, FGD6, THBD, RTN1, and RRAGD. MiR-34a was identified to be a tumor suppressor in many types of solid tumor. It was reported that microRNAs usually act as a silencer of gene expression by binding to the 30 untranslated regions (30 UTRs) of target mRNAs, inhibiting their translation or marking them for degradation [17], so that the downregulated genes might be more reliable targets of miR-34a in the progression of CRC. Among these genes, NTN4, KLF4, SERPINE1, and SEMA4B played critical roles in regulating cell growth, migration, and invasion in various of cancers, including CRC [9,3537]. Studies showed that the expression of SERPINE1 was increased in CRC and was related to tumor invasiveness and aggressiveness [36]. KLF4 was an important factor in regulating cell cycle [38], which played important roles in the progression of CRC. Other genes such as CEBPG and PPARG were also reported to be related to the progression of cancers [39,40]. Many of these genes, such as KLF4 and PPARG, were reported to be regulatory targets of miR-34a [41,42]. There were studies that showed that miR-34a regulated apoptosis in liver cells by targeting the KLF4 gene [41]. These results indicated the critical roles of miR-34a in CRC, and indicated that miR-34a could affect the progression of CRC by regulating the expressions of genes related to cell migration, invasion, and other tumor related functions. At the same time, six genes (KNTC1, CDC45, HAT1, DLGAP5, KIAA0101, and FAM64A), were identified to be overlaps between DEGs-1 and DEGs-2, indicating their potential functions in the progression of CRC and their relationship with miR-34a. These genes were also reported to be biomarkers or to be closely linked to cell migration, invasion, or DNA replication in various of cancers [4346]. KIAA0101 was a p15PAF (proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA)-associated factor) to bind with PCNA. Studies have shown that KIAA0101 was overexpressed in pancreatic cancer cells, and knocking down of KIAA0101 by small interfering RNA in pancreatic cancer cells caused drastic attenuation of cell proliferation, well exogenous overexpression of KIAA0101 enhanced cancer cell growth [45]. CDC45 plays a critical role in DNA replication. Studies showed that the expression of CDC45 was tightly associated with proliferating cell populations, and CDC45 seemed to be a promising candidate for a novel proliferation marker in cancer cell biology [46]. In our study, these overlapped genes were differently expressed in DEGs-1, DEGs-2, and the targets of miR-34a; thus we surmised that miR-34a might affect the progression of CRC by regulating the expression of these tumor related genes directly or indirectly.

Conclusions

In summary, pathways related to cell cycle, DNA replication, oocyte meiosis, and pyrimidine metabolism might be associated with CRC. MiR-34a plays an important role in regulating the progression of CRC and may provide an important reference for the diagnosis and treatment of CRC. Several genes such as SERPINE1, KLF4, SEMA4B, PPARG, CDC45, and KIAA0101 might be the targets of miR-34a and the potential therapeutic targets of CRC. Our study helps provide a better understanding of miR-34a in CRC and may provide important reference for the diagnosis and treatment of CRC. However, further experiments are still needed to confirm the results and to explore the specific regulation mechanism between miR-34a and these targets.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank all the members of our research group for their enthusiastic participation in this study.

Source of support: Departmental sources

Conflict of interests

None.

References

1. Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, et al. Global cancer statistics, 2012. Cancer J Clin. 2011;61:69–90. [PubMed]
2. Greenlee RT, Murray T, Bolden S, Wingo PA. Cancer statistics, 2000. Cancer J Clin. 2000;50:7–33. [PubMed]
3. Pasetto LM, Monfardini S. Colorectal cancer screening in elderly patients: When should be more useful? Cancer Treat Rev. 2007;33:528–32. [PubMed]
4. Mccleary NJ, Meyerhardt JA, Green E, et al. Impact of age on the efficacy of newer adjuvant therapies in patients with stage II/III colon cancer: findings from the ACCENT database. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31:2600–6. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
5. Obrand DI, Gordon PH. Incidence and patterns of recurrence following curative resection for colorectal carcinoma. Dis Colon Rectum. 1997;40:15–24. [PubMed]
6. André T, Boni C, Mounedjiboudiaf L, et al. Oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, and leucovorin as adjuvant treatment for colon cancer. New Engl J Med. 2004;350:2343–51. [PubMed]
7. Marisa L, De RA, Duval A, et al. Gene expression classification of colon cancer into molecular subtypes: characterization, validation, and prognostic value. PLoS Med. 2013;10:e1001453. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
8. Carthew RW. Gene regulation by microRNAs. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2006;16:203–8. [PubMed]
9. Zhang J, Zheng F, Yu G, et al. miR-196a targets netrin 4 and regulates cell proliferation and migration of cervical cancer cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2013;440:582–88. [PubMed]
10. Schickel R, Boyerinas B, Park SM, Peter ME. MicroRNAs: Key players in the immune system, differentiation, tumorigenesis and cell death. Oncogene. 2008;27:5959–74. [PubMed]
11. Ma Y, Li W, Wang H. Roles of miRNA in the initiation and development of colorectal carcinoma. Curr Pharm Des. 2012;19:1253–61. [PubMed]
12. Rokavec M, MGÖ, Li H, et al. Corrigendum. IL-6R/STAT3/miR-34a feedback loop promotes EMT-mediated colorectal cancer invasion and metastasis. J Clin Invest. 2014;124:1853–67. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
13. Lujambio A, Lowe SW. The microcosmos of cancer. Nature. 2012;482:347–55. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
14. Nugent M, Miller N, Kerin MJ. Circulating miR-34a levels are reduced in colorectal cancer. J Surg Oncol. 2012;106:947–52. [PubMed]
15. Hermeking H. The miR-34 family in cancer and apoptosis. Cell Death & Differentiation. 2009;17:193–99. [PubMed]
16. Bu P, Chen KY, Chen JH, et al. A microRNA miR-34a-regulated bimodal switch targets notch in colon cancer stem cells. Cell Stem Cell. 2013;12:602–15. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
17. He L, He X, Lim PL, et al. A microRNA component of the p53 tumour suppressor network. Nature. 2007;447:1130–34. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
18. Lapointe LC, Dunne R, Brown GS, et al. Map of differential transcript expression in the normal human large intestine. Physiol Genomics. 2008;33:50–64. [PubMed]
19. Youn BS, Kim YJ, Mantel C, et al. Blocking of c-FLIP(L) – independent cycloheximide-induced apoptosis or Fas-mediated apoptosis by the CC chemokine receptor 9/TECK interaction. Blood. 2001;98:925–33. [PubMed]
20. Choi YJ, Lin CP, Ho JJ, et al. R-34 miRNAs provide a barrier for somatic cell reprogramming. Nat Cell Biol. 2011;13:1353–60. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
21. Sampieri K, Fodde R. Cancer stem cells and metastasis. Semin Cancer Biol. 2012;22:187–93. [PubMed]
22. Gao J, Li N, Dong Y, et al. miR-34a-5p suppresses colorectal cancer metastasis and predicts recurrence in patients with stage II|[sol]|III colorectal cancer. Oncogene. 2015;34:4142–52. [PubMed]
23. Sherman BT, Da WH, Tan Q, et al. DAVID Knowledgebase: A gene-centered database integrating heterogeneous gene annotation resources to facilitate high-throughput gene functional analysis. BMC Bioinformatics. 2007;8:426. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
24. Dennis G, Jr, Sherman BT, Hosack DA, et al. DAVID: Database for annotation, visualization, and integrated discovery. Genome Biol. 2003;4:P3. [PubMed]
25. Chang TC, Wentzel EA, Kent OA, et al. Transactivation of miR-34a by p53 broadly influences gene expression and promotes apoptosis. Mol Cell. 2007;26:745–52. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
26. Bardhan K, Liu K. Epigenetics and colorectal cancer pathogenesis. Cancers. 2013;5:676–713. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
27. Williams GH, Stoeber K. The cell cycle and cancer. J Pathol. 2012;226:352–64. [PubMed]
28. Diaz-Moralli S, Tarrado-Castellarnau M, Miranda A, Cascante M. Targeting cell cycle regulation in cancer therapy. Pharmacol Ther. 2013;138:255–71. [PubMed]
29. Cuzick J, Berney DM, Fisher G, et al. Prognostic value of a cell cycle progression signature for prostate cancer death in a conservatively managed needle biopsy cohort. Br J Cancer. 2012;106:1095–99. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
30. Wang M, Kaufman RJ. The impact of the endoplasmic reticulum protein-folding environment on cancer development. Nat Rev Cancer. 2014;14:581–97. [PubMed]
31. Bogert CVD, Kernebeek GV, Lou DL, Kroon AM. Inhibition of mitochondrial protein synthesis leads to proliferation arrest in the G 1 -phase of the cell cycle. Cancer Lett. 1986;32:41–51. [PubMed]
32. Davis WJ, Lehmann PZ, Li W. Nuclear PI3K signaling in cell growth and tumorigenesis. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2015;3:24. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
33. Li L, Yuan L, Luo J, et al. MiR-34a inhibits proliferation and migration of breast cancer through down-regulation of Bcl-2 and SIRT1. Clin Exp Med. 2013;13:109–17. [PubMed]
34. Yamakuchi M, Ferlito M, Lowenstein CJ. miR-34a repression of SIRT1 regulates apoptosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2008;105:13421–26. [PubMed]
35. Tian Y, Luo A, Cai Y, et al. MicroRNA-10b promotes migration and invasion through KLF4 in human esophageal cancer cell lines. J Biol Chem. 2010;285:7986–94. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
36. Jian H, Zhao Y, Liu B, Lu S. SEMA4b inhibits MMP9 to prevent metastasis of non-small cell lung cancer. Tumour Biol. 2014;35(11):11051–56. [PubMed]
37. Mazzoccoli G, Pazienza V, Panza A, et al. ARNTL2 and SERPINE1: Potential biomarkers for tumor aggressiveness in colorectal cancer. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2012;138:501–11. [PubMed]
38. Yoon HS, Chen X, Yang VW. Kruppel-like factor 4 mediates p53-dependent G1/S cell cycle arrest in response to DNA damage. J Biol Chem. 2003;278:2101–5. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
39. Chen J, Xie F, Chen K, et al. ERCC5 promoter polymorphisms at −763 and +25 predict the response to oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy in patients with advanced colorectal cancer. Cancer Biol Ther. 2009;8:1424–30. [PubMed]
40. Dong H, Chang DC, Hua MH, et al. 2 -O methylation of internal adenosine by flavivirus NS5 methyltransferase. PLoS Pathogens. 2012;8:e1002642. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
41. Qiu C, Lei L, Yu T, et al. MiR-34a regulates apoptosis in liver cells by targeting the KLF4 gene. Cell Mol Biol Lett. 2014;19:52–64. [PubMed]
42. Lamba V, Ghodke Y, Guan W, Tracy TS. microRNA-34a is associated with expression of key hepatic transcription factors and cytochromes P450. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2014;445:404–11. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
43. Kim YR, Chung NG, Kang MR, et al. Novel somatic frameshift mutations of genes related to cell cycle and DNA damage response in gastric and colorectal cancers with microsatellite instability. Tumori. 2010;96:1004–49. [PubMed]
44. Loo LW, Cheng I, Tiirikainen M, et al. cis-Expression QTL analysis of established colorectal cancer risk variants in colon tumors and adjacent normal tissue. PloS One. 2012;7:e30477. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
45. Hosokawa M, Takehara A, Matsuda K, et al. Oncogenic role of KIAA0101 interacting with proliferating cell nuclear antigen in pancreatic cancer. Cancer Res. 2007;67:2568–76. [PubMed]
46. Pollok S, Bauerschmidt C, Sänger J, et al. Human Cdc45 is a proliferation-associated antigen. FEBS J. 2007;274:3669–84. [PubMed]

Articles from Medical Science Monitor : International Medical Journal of Experimental and Clinical Research are provided here courtesy of International Scientific Literature, Inc.