Search tips
Search criteria 


Logo of jrmInfo for AuthorsJournal of Rural Medicine
J Rural Med. 2017 November; 12(2): 149–152.
Published online 2017 November 30. doi:  10.2185/jrm.2946
PMCID: PMC5721302

Ambulant treatment for a very elderly patient with acute deep vein thrombosis in a rural area: A case report


Acute symptomatic deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is usually managed by intravenous heparin and oral warfarin. Recently, direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) have been introduced for the treatment of acute DVT. DOAC may be useful for very elderly patients who live in rural areas, where medical resources are limited. An 83-year-old woman presented to our clinic with left leg edema. Contrast enhanced computed tomography showed massive deep vein thrombosis in her left internal iliac vein. We diagnosed her with acute deep vein thrombosis. Since she refused to be hospitalized, we treated her with rivaroxaban as an outpatient. She had a good clinical course without hospitalization or an adverse event. DOAC may be useful for very elderly patients in rural areas.

Keywords: deep vein thrombosis. direct oral anticoagulant, rural and remote area


Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is a common cardiovascular disease1), and the estimated number of new patients diagnosed with DVT is approximately 15,000 per year in Japan2). Acute DVT is frequently managed using anticoagulant agents such as intravenous heparin and oral warfarin. Intravenous heparin is typically continued until the patient’s International Normalized Ratio (INR), as determined by prothrombin time (PT), reaches therapeutic levels following oral warfarin3). Therefore, patients with acute DVT usually require several days of hospitalization, although some patients with acute DVT might not require hospitalization if patients can frequently visit the clinic by themselves.

On the other hand, hospitalization may cause several problems, such as delirium, in very elderly patients4). Because it is usually difficult for very elderly patients in rural areas to visit clinic frequently by themselves, very elderly patients with acute DVT have no other option but to be hospitalized. Recently, direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have been introduced for acute DVT treatment5). This case report suggests that DOACs can be a good option for very elderly patients with acute symptomatic DVT living in rural areas, where medical resources are not abundant.


An 83-year-old woman with hypertension and hypertensive heart disease presented to our clinic with left leg edema, pain, and redness without shortness of breath. Her blood pressure (BP) and heart rate (HR) were 126/64 mmHg and 74 beats/min, respectively. A blood analysis performed in our clinic showed an elevated D-dimer level of 6.0 µg/mL. We suspected acute DVT and transferred her to a core hospital which covers a broad geographic area including our community about twenty kilometers from our clinic. Contrast enhanced computed tomography (CT) showed massive deep vein thrombosis from the left internal iliac vein to the popliteal vein (Figure 1a). We diagnosed acute deep vein thrombosis and recommended hospitalization. However, she refused to be hospitalized, because the distance from her home to the core hospital was relatively far for her and her family. Since her normal activities of daily living (ADL) were preserved and her clinical frailty scale score was 5 (mildly frail), we decided to treat her as an outpatient and prescribed rivaroxaban (30 mg/day) (Day 0). Furthermore, previous studies suggested that rivaroxaban treatment might be an effective and safe treatment for an elderly patient with acute DVT and lead to regression of massive DVT6, 7). She was carefully followed up in our clinic. Her left leg edema gradually improved without exacerbation, and her D-dimer level also decreased (0.64 µg/mL). We continued rivaroxaban (30 mg/day) for 21 days and tapered to rivaroxaban 15 mg/day (Figure 2). Follow-up CT showed regression of thrombosis in the left external iliac artery at day 117 (Figure 1b). A blood test was performed to examine the risk factors for acute DVT including tumor and autoimmune disease. Her blood test showed a high level of immunoglobulin A (1,502 mg/dL), suggesting the possibility of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance. However, as she and her family refused further examination for monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance, no specific treatment for that disease was introduced. There have been no adverse events for four months since follow up.

Figure 1
Contrast enhanced computed tomography (CT) showed that a burden of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) decreased drastically after treatment. The left side of the figure (Figure 1a), taken at time of diagnosis, shows the presence of a large DVT from the left iliac ...
Figure 2
Clinical course and rivaroxaban dose change. The patient was initially treated with intensive rivaroxaban treatment (30 mg/day). Since her left leg edema gradually improved, we reduced the rivaroxaban dose to 15 mg/day in 21 days, and to 10 mg/day in 112 ...

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for the publication of this case report and any accompanying images.


DVT is a common vascular disease even in rural and remote areas8). Although conventional anticoagulants such as intravenous heparin and warfarin are standard therapy for DVT, the risk of bleeding is greater with warfarin than with DOAC9). Moreover, the dose adjustment with warfarin requires several days to weeks3, 10). Therefore, the combination of intravenous heparin and warfarin usually requires hospitalization, which may cause adverse events such as delirium in elderly patients4). DOAC is as effective as other conventional anticoagulants, and does not require the minute dose adjustment11), which enables us to treat an acute symptomatic DVT patient as an outpatient12).

While the combination therapy of heparin and warfarin for acute DVT usually requires hospitalization, ambulant treatment including subcutaneous injections of heparin twice a day is possible if a patient can visit a clinic frequently by herself13). However, ambulant treatment for acute DVT is very difficult for very elderly patients in rural areas, because the amount of such medical resources was generally lesser in rural areas than in urban areas, indicating sufficient medical resources including services to support home medical care are necessary for ambulant treatment14). On the other hand, DOAC does not require intravenous or subcutaneous heparin. Therefore, very elderly patients in rural areas may not require hospitalization for the treatment of acute DVT.

Hospitalization often results in deterioration in activities of daily living (ADL) in elderly patients, and may be associated with greater mortality in elderly patients15, 16). Several studies regarding elderly patients show the importance of efforts to reduce hospitalization17, 18). However, there is a substantial risk in treating elderly patients with a severe illness such as acute DVT in outpatient clinics. We should take a balance of risk and benefit of ambulant treatment.

This case suggests that ambulant treatment by DOAC can be a good option for very elderly patients with acute DVT in rural areas. Ambulant treatment can preserve ADL of very elderly patients, and facilitate rehabilitation into local society. However, since acute DVT is the main cause of acute pulmonary embolism, which can be fatal in the very elderly, we should take a balanced view of risk and benefit of ambulant treatment even if DOAC are used.

Conflict of interest: The authors declare no conflicts of interest in association with the present study


1. Cohen AT, Agnelli G, Anderson FA. VTE Impact Assessment Group in Europe (VITAE). Venous thromboembolism (VTE) in Europe. The number of VTE events and associated morbidity and mortality. Thromb Haemost 2007; 98: 756–764. [PubMed]
2. Sakuma M, Nakamura M, Yamada N. Venous thromboembolism: deep vein thrombosis with pulmonary embolism, deep vein thrombosis alone, and pulmonary embolism alone. Circ J 2009; 73: 305–309. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-08-0372 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
3. Hull RD, Raskob GE, Rosenbloom D. Heparin for 5 days as compared with 10 days in the initial treatment of proximal venous thrombosis. N Engl J Med 1990; 322: 1260–1264. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199005033221802 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
4. Hartjes TM, Meece L, Horgas ALCE. Assessing and managing pain, agitation, and delirium in hospitalized older adults. Am J Nurs 2016; 116: 38–46. doi: 10.1097/01.NAJ.0000503300.22262.c7 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
5. Coleman CI, Coleman C, Bunz TJ. Effectiveness and safety of rivaroxaban versus warfarin for treatment and prevention of recurrence of venous thromboembolism. Thromb Haemost 2017; 117: 117. doi: 10.1160/TH17-03-0210 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
6. Koitabashi N, Niwamae N, Taguchi T. Remarkable regression of massive deep vein thrombosis in response to intensive oral rivaroxaban treatment. Thromb J 2015; 13: 13. doi: 10.1186/s12959-015-0045-1 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
7. Yamada N, Hirayama A, Maeda H. Oral rivaroxaban for Japanese patients with symptomatic venous thromboembolism - the J-EINSTEIN DVT and PE program. Thromb J 2015; 13: 2. doi: 10.1186/s12959-015-0035-3 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
8. Karlsson G, Riba P, Thornóroddsson I. Deep vein thrombosis incidence at Akureyri Hospital, Iceland 19751990. Long term prognosis. Laeknabladid 2000; 86: 19–24 (In Icelandic). [PubMed]
9. Cangemi DJ, Krill T, Weideman R. A Comparison of the rate of gastrointestinal bleeding in patients taking non-vitamin k antagonist oral anticoagulants or Warfarin. Am J Gastroenterol 2017; 112: 734–739. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2017.39 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
10. Hull R, Hirsh J, Jay R. Different intensities of oral anticoagulant therapy in the treatment of proximal-vein thrombosis. N Engl J Med 1982; 307: 1676–1681. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198212303072704 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
11. Shirley M, Dhillon S. Edoxaban: A review in deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. Drugs 2015; 75: 2025–2034. doi: 10.1007/s40265-015-0495-6 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
12. Nunnelee JD. Review of an article: oral rivaroxaban for symptomatic venous thromboembolism. The EINSTEIN Investigators et al. N Engl J Med 2010; 363(26):24992510. J Vasc Nurs 2011; 29: 89. doi: 10.1016/j.jvn.2011.03.002 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
13. Holm HA, Ly B, Handeland GF. Subcutaneous heparin treatment of deep venous thrombosis: a comparison of unfractionated and low molecular weight heparin. Haemostasis 1986; 16(Suppl 2): 30–37. [PubMed]
14. Chen Y, Yin Z, Xie Q. Suggestions to ameliorate the inequity in urban/rural allocation of healthcare resources in China. Int J Equity Health 2014; 13: 34. doi: 10.1186/1475-9276-13-34 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
15. Mazière S, Lanièce I, Hadri N. Predictors of functional decline of older persons after an hospitalisation in an acute care for elder unit: importance of recent functional evolution. Presse Med 2011; 40: e101–e110 (In French). [PubMed]
16. Galvin R, Gilleit Y, Wallace E. Adverse outcomes in older adults attending emergency departments: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the Identification of Seniors At Risk (ISAR) screening tool. Age Ageing 2017; 46: 179–186. [PubMed]
17. Thomas RE, Jefferson T, Lasserson TJ. Influenza vaccination for healthcare workers who care for people aged 60 or older living in long-term care institutions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016; CD005187. [PubMed]
18. Lee P, Ng C, Slattery A. Preadmission bisphosphonate and mortality in critically Ill patients. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2016; 101: 1945–1953. doi: 10.1210/jc.2015-3467 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]

Articles from Journal of Rural Medicine : JRM are provided here courtesy of Japanese Association of Rural Medicine