PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of scirepAboutEditorial BoardFor AuthorsScientific Reports
 
Sci Rep. 2017; 7: 17142.
Published online 2017 December 7. doi:  10.1038/s41598-017-17496-7
PMCID: PMC5719458

Pharmacological inhibition of REV-ERB stimulates differentiation, inhibits turnover and reduces fibrosis in dystrophic muscle

Abstract

Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) is a debilitating X-linked disorder that is fatal. DMD patients lack the expression of the structural protein dystrophin caused by mutations within the DMD gene. The absence of functional dystrophin protein results in excessive damage from normal muscle use due to the compromised structural integrity of the dystrophin associated glycoprotein complex. As a result, DMD patients exhibit ongoing cycles of muscle destruction and regeneration that promote inflammation, fibrosis, mitochondrial dysfunction, satellite cell (SC) exhaustion and loss of skeletal and cardiac muscle function. The nuclear receptor REV-ERB suppresses myoblast differentiation and recently we have demonstrated that the REV-ERB antagonist, SR8278, stimulates muscle regeneration after acute injury. Therefore, we decided to explore whether the REV-ERB antagonist SR8278 could slow the progression of muscular dystrophy. In mdx mice SR8278 increased lean mass and muscle function, and decreased muscle fibrosis and muscle protein degradation. Interestingly, we also found that SR8278 increased the SC pool through stimulation of Notch and Wnt signaling. These results suggest that REV-ERB is a potent target for the treatment of DMD.

Introduction

Duchenne’s muscular dystrophy (DMD) is a progressive, fatal muscle wasting disorder caused by mutations within the dystrophin gene that affects 1:5000–10000 boys1. Even with treatment DMD patients have an expected lifespan of around 25 years. Boys affected with DMD are ambulatory only until about the age of 12, and become wheelchair bound and dependent on mechanical ventilation for respiratory support2. Patients eventually succumb to either cardiac or respiratory failure3. Dystrophin is a subsarcolemmal protein and a key component of the dystrophin-associated glycoprotein complex (DAG) that has both mechanical stabilizing and signaling roles in mediating interactions between the cytoskeleton, membrane and extracellular matrix. Loss of full-length dystrophin severely compromises myofiber stability and disrupts calcium signaling. As a consequence, normal muscle contraction produces excessively high levels of intracellular muscle damage. This results in rapid turnover of muscle fibers, inflammation, mitochondrial dysfunction, reduction in satellite cell numbers, and fibrosis that collectively deplete functional muscle mass4,5.

DMD is treated clinically with glucocorticoids, which slow loss of motor function and muscle turnover, possibly by inhibiting fibrosis6,7. However, the associated side effects of glucocorticoid use are often at odds with their beneficial effects in DMD. Physical therapy also has some proven therapeutic benefits, however, like glucocorticoids physical therapy cannot completely stymy DMD progression7. Other targeted approaches using anti-inflammatory agents that block NF-κB signaling have not advanced past clinical trials8. Cell based approaches that either employ CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing technology to repair DMD mutations and reprogram SC are still experimental9,10. More radical cell replacement therapies like autologous bone marrow transplant have not been comprehensively tested as clinically viable treatments11. Similarly inuitively appealing methods; exon skipping therapies, that attempt to rescue dystrophin protein expression in skeletal muscle (SkM) have been tested in patients1214. These treatments utilize antisense oligonucleotides (AONs) to modify mRNA splicing of dystrophin transcripts and can potentially yield therapeutic benefits in about 83% of DMD patients. One AON, eteplirsen (or exondys 51), a morpholino designed to restore partial dystrophin expression by skipping exon 51, has successfully gained FDA approval. Yet in clinical trials involving eteplirsen the correlation between measured therapeutic outcomes and the degree of rescued dystrophin expression was unexpectedly inconsistent15. Inefficiencies of delivery and poor pharmacokinetics are some of the confounding technical challenges that are yet to be fully overcome with these agents. Meanwhile, efforts to eliminate incongruences in patient sorting and the manner in which therapeutic effects are measured in clinical trials should allow the therapeutic benefits of AONs to be more accurately gauged. The small molecule drug ataluren, which promotes ribosomal skipping of premature stop codons has also similarly been successfully used to rescue functional dystrophin expression and muscle function in DMD. Still, ataluren has only displayed therapeutic effects in select patient subgroups1619. While all these treatments hold significant promise, they are still essentially palliative as they only delay loss of ambulation. Nevertheless, pharmacological therapies that have a favorable safety profile, potently combat muscle wasting and inhibit fibrosis with comparable efficacy to that of glucocorticoids are still much needed.

The nuclear receptor REV-ERB (REV-ERBα and REV-ERBβ) are ligand activated transcription factors and constituent transcriptional repressors20 encoded by the genes NR1D1 and NR1D2 respectively. REV-ERB is highly expressed in SkM and is an important regulatory component of the circadian clock, and a regulator of metabolism and cellular differentiation21. The circadian clock activator Brain and Muscle ARNT-Like 1 (BMAL1) is known inducer of myogenic and Wnt signaling in SkM and regulates adult SkM repair22. Bmal1 expression has also been linked to SkM myosin heavy chain content and shown to be critical to the maintenance of the Pax7+ satellite cell population23,24. REV-ERB directly inhibits Bmal1 expression by interacting with REV-ERB response elements (ROREs) at target gene promoters25. Interestingly, REV-ERB has been shown to inhibit myoblast differentiation by repressing myogenic signaling and cell cycle checkpoint regulators through an RORE-binding independent mechanism26. We have also shown that targeted disruption of REV-ERB activity stimulated muscle regeneration in response to acute injury26, suggesting that REV-ERB antagonists may be therapeutically beneficial in an assortment of myopathies.

We therefore explored whether disrupting REV-ERB activity using the REV-ERB antagonist SR8278 could slow the progression of muscular dystrophy in a model of DMD, the mdx mouse. REV-ERB antagonism improved muscle function, reduced fibrosis, stimulated mitochondrial biogenesis and induced an oxidative fiber phenotype in dystrophic mice possibly through activation of Wnt signaling. These observations suggest that pharmacologically active REV-ERB ligands should be capable of ameliorating the progression of dystrophinopathies.

Results

REV-ERB antagonism increases lean mass and improves muscle function in mdx mice

REV-ERB is an inhibitor of myogenesis in myoblasts and pharmacological antagonism of REV-ERB stimulates muscle regeneration during acute injury2729. Therefore, we postulated that inhibiting REV-ERB pharmacologically in a model of muscular dystrophy could yield some therapeutic benefit. We treated 10-week old mdx mice (n = 10 per group) with SR8278 or vehicle control for 6 weeks and assessed total body weight, adiposity and lean mass. Interestingly, SR8278 treatment increased lean mass and may have improved limb muscle function, as evidenced by grip strength assessment, without an overall increase in total mass (Fig. 1A–D). In order to probe the toxicity profile of SR8278 we performed clinical chemistry on the plasma samples of treated mice. Mice receiving SR8278 showed no elevation in the hepatic toxicity markers alanine aminotransferase (ALT), alkaline phosphatase (ALP) and urea suggesting that SR8278 was well tolerated and had no hepatotoxic effects (Supplementary Fig. 1A). There was similarly no evidence of SR8278 hepatomegaly in wild type C57Bl6J mice dosed with SR8278 for 3 weeks (Supplementary Fig. 1B). These observations suggest that disrupting REV-ERB activity may have systemically stabilized SkM in dystrophic mice without overt toxicity.

Figure 1
The Rev-Erb antagonist SR8278 increases lean mass and improves muscle function in dystrophic mice. (A) Total body mass of mdx mice treated with SR8278 or vehicle control over 6 weeks (n = 10). (B) Percent fat mass in mdx mice from (A). ...

Antagonizing REV-ERB improves muscle architecture and reduces fibrosis in dystrophic muscle

In order to further understand the global effects of REV-ERB antagonism in SR8278 treated mice we performed histological assessment of the gastrocnemius and thoracic diaphragm muscles. H&E staining of mdx mouse muscle showed significant improvements in muscle fiber architecture with reduced basophilic infiltrates in mice treated with SR8278 (Fig. 2A). In addition, SkM of mice dosed with SR8278, exhibited reduced picrosirius red staining for fibrosis compared to vehicle treated mice (Fig. 2B). Similarly, fibrosis in the thoracic diaphragm, a major contributor to dystrophic patient mortality, was also significantly reduced in SR8278 treated mice (Fig. 2C). These observations indicate that SR8278 reduced intramuscular inflammation, and muscle turnover, and slowed the replacement of myofibers with fibrotic tissue; all key factors that drive DMD pathology.

Figure 2
Antagonizing Rev-Erb improves muscle pathology and reduces fibrosis in dystrophic muscle. (A) Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining of the gastrocnemius muscle in SR8278 and vehicle treated mdx mice improves structure and decreases fibrosis in ...

Pro-myogenic factor expression is induced by REV-ERB antagonism

Quantification of myogenesis expression in the muscle of mdx mice revealed that the myogenic factors myosin D (Myod), myogenic factor 5 (Myf5), myosin heavy chain 1 (Mhc1) myosin heavy chain 2b (Mhc2b) and embryonic myosin heavy chain (Mhc3) were all increased in antagonist treated mdx muscle (Fig. 3A). This induction of myosin heavy chain expression was specific to mdx muscle, as SR8278 failed to induce myosin heavy chain expression in wild type (C57Bl6J) mouse muscle (Supplementary Fig. 1C). These observations are in accord with that of previous studies where REV-ERB antagonists only mediated an effect on myosin gene expression under conditions where muscle turnover is actively occurring26. In parallel, immunoblot analysis showed an increase in MHC1, MHC2, MYOD and MYF5 protein expression in dystrophic mice treated with SR8278 (Fig. 3B). Importantly, SR8278 appeared to stimulate the expression of myosin heavy chain proteins specific to both slow oxidative (MHC1) and fast glycolytic (MHC2) muscle fibers (Fig. 3A,B). Interestingly, antagonist treatment did not alter muscle-specific MHC protein expression as the drug failed to significantly induce MHC1 expression in the gastrocnemius muscle, where it is not predominantly expressed, but stimulated both MHC1 and MHC2 expression in the soleus. With the observed increase in myosin heavy chain expression and stabilization in total lean mass considered, we decided to quantify the myofiber cross sectional areas in vehicle and SR8278 treated mice. Antagonist treatment marginally increased cross-sectional area and stimulated regeneration, evidenced by central nuclei, in the tibialis anterior specifically, but not the gastrocnemius (Fig. 3C) analogous to what has been observed previously in rodent models of acute muscle injury26.These results imply that antagonizing REV-ERB stimulates myogenic programs that enhance the expression of structural myosin heavy chains and may selectively stabilize lean mass in a muscle specific manner.

Figure 3
SR8278 increases pro-myogenic gene expression in dystrophic muscle (A). RT-QPCR showing expression of pro-myogenic factors Myod, Myf5, Mhc1, Mhc2b, Mhc2x and Mhc3 in the soleus and gastrocnemius muscle of mdx mice in response to SR8278 or vehicle treatment ...

REV-ERB antagonists promote mitochondrial biogenesis and oxidative fiber phenotype

Mitochondrial biogenesis and activity are disregulated in DMD30. As a consequence, the oxidative capacity and prevalence of active oxidative fibers is reduced in dystrophic SkM. In order to further elucidate the mechanism through which SR8278 was improving muscle function and stabilizing lean mass we decided to assess the influence of REV-ERB antagonism on mitochondrial biogenesis and muscle fiber type. SR8278 treatment induced expression of a number of mitochondrial factors including Tfam, Pgc1a, Nampt, Sirt3 and Nrf1 in dystrophic soleus and gastrocnemius muscle (Fig. 4A), implying that mitochondrial biogenesis was enhanced by SR8278. Immunofluorescent fiber type profiling further revealed that SR8278 specifically increased the ratio of type IIa oxidative fibers relative to type IIb glycolytic fibers in SkM (Fig. 4B). In accord with this, the number of muscle fibers positive for succinate dehydrogenase (SDH) staining, a histological marker for oxidative muscle fibers, was also significantly increased by SR8278 treatment (Fig. 4C). Based on these analyses it appears that REV-ERB antagonism promoted mitochondrial biogenesis, and enhanced the oxidative fiber content and capacity of dystrophic muscle.

Figure 4
Rev-Erb antagonist treatment promotes mitochondrial biogenesis and an oxidative phenotype in dystrophic muscle. (A) Mitochondrial biogenesis gene expression- Tfam, Pgc1a, Nampt, Sirt 3 and Nrf1- in the gastrocnemius and soleus muscle of SR8278 and vehicle ...

REV-ERB inhibition enhances Wnt and Notch signaling in SkM

Wnt and Notch control developmental signaling pathways that have key roles in muscle repair and satellite cell self-renewal. DMD patients display altered SkM Notch signaling that has been proven to be essential to satellite cell self-renewal and indispensable for the maintenance of SC quiescence3133. During muscle repair, the Wnt transcription factor β-catenin (CTNNB1) mediates Wnt target-gene transcriptional regulation during satellite cell, proliferation, differentiation and fusion with myotubes3441. Previous studies have also shown that activation of canonical Wnt signaling was therapeutic in rodent models of muscular dystrophy and acute injury39,4245. We examined whether REV-ERB antagonism may also be modulating Notch and Wnt signaling activity in SkM. We discovered that SR8278 treatment increased both Notch (Numb, Notch) and Wnt target-gene expression (Hes6, Hey1) (Fig. 5A). This upregulation of Wnt and Notch target genes in mice receiving SR8278 correlated with enhanced expression of the cell cycle progression regulators p21 and cyclin-dependent kinase A2 (Ccna2), which promote myoblast differentiation (Fig. 5B). Interestingly, Pax7 expression, a marker for SkM satellite cells, was also significantly upregulated in SR8278 treated muscle (Fig. 5B). SR8278 inhibited Ctnnb1 phosphorylation at Ser37 (Fig. 5C), a casein kinase 1 binding site that promotes Ctnnb1 proteasomal degradation and suppresses Wnt transcriptional activity34,36. SR8278 also promoted stabilization of total Ctnnb1 protein levels and increased protein expression of the Wnt target gene Axin2 (Fig. 5C). Immunohistological assessment of Pax7 expression revealed an increase in the number Pax7+ cells along the myofibers margins in SR8278 treated mice (Fig. 5D). Collectively these observations suggest that antagonizing REV-ERB modulates Wnt and Notch signaling to increase Pax7+ populations in dystrophic muscle.

Figure 5
Rev-Erb disruption stimulates satellite cell activation in dystrophic muscle through activation of Wnt and Notch signaling. (A) mRNA expression of the Notch target genes Numb, Notch1, Hes6 and Hey1. (B) mRNA expression of the SkM satellite marker Pax7 ...

Another factor that influences muscle turnover, the ubiquitin-proteasome system in the SkM is involved in degrading sarcomeric proteins and myogenic response factors to promote muscle atrophy46. The muscle specific E3 ubiquitin ligases MURF-1 and MAF-BX tag proteins for 26 S proteasome mediated degradation and genetic ablation of these two factors protected mice from muscular atrophy47. In addition, MURF-1 and MAF-BX specifically are key mediators of the degradation of myosin heavy chains and MYOD48. We found that both MURF-1 and MAF-BX expression were downregulated by SR8278 treatment in soleus and gastrocnemius muscle (Fig. 5E). These findings suggest that REV-ERB inhibition slows myofiber protein turnover by reducing expression of MURF-1 and MAF-BX.

Rev-Erb regulates Wnt signaling downstream of Wnt receptor activation in muscle cells

Based on the observed activation of Wnt in response to REV-ERB antagonism, we attempted to identify at which part of the Wnt pathway SR8278 may be mediating its effect. Firstly, we evaluated the effect of siRNA-mediated knockdown of REV-ERBα/β on Wnt transcriptional activity in differentiating C2C12 myoblasts. shRNA-mediated knock down of REV-ERBβ expression induced the Wnt signaling genes Axin2, Ctnnb1, and Tcf3 (Fig. 6A). Secondly, we used the REV-ERB agonist SR9011 and antagonist SR8278 to elucidate whether Wnt target gene transcription was dependent on REV-ERB transcriptional activity. We observed that the REV-ERB agonist SR9011 and antagonist SR8278 reciprocally modulated Wnt activity in myoblasts (Fig. 6B). These observations coupled with that of mdx mouse muscle confirmed that REV-ERB expression and transcriptional suppression specifically inhibited Wnt signaling in myoblasts. To further probe this relationship between Wnt and REV-ERB we attempted to identify if REV-ERB’s influence on Wnt target gene expression could be enhanced by Wnt pathway activation and blunted by Wnt inhibition. We co-treated myoblasts with lithium chloride (LiCl), which disrupts CTNNB1 proteasomal degradation and enhances Wnt pathway activity and SR8278. As expected, SR8278 treatment and LiCl independently induced Wnt-target gene expression (Axin2) (Fig. 6C). In addition, co-treatment of myoblasts with SR8278 and LiCl had an additive effect on Wnt target gene expression (Fig. 6C). The Wnt inhibitor wnt-C59 prevents the palmitylation of Wnt ligands by Porcupine, Wnt ligand secretion and receptor mediated pathway activation49. To identify whether REV-ERB suppressed Wnt signaling upstream of Wnt receptor activation we assessed the combined effects of the Wnt inhibitor wnt-C59 on Wnt target gene expression in the presence or absence of SR8278. We observed that in cells treated with wnt-C59, SR8278 was unable to stimulate Axin2 expression (Fig. 6D). These results support the concept that REV-ERB modulates Wnt signaling likely through an intracellular mechanism that is downstream of Wnt ligand-mediated activation.

Figure 6
Rev-Erb regulates Wnt signaling downstream of Wnt receptor activation in muscle cells. (A) Expression of the Wnt target genes Axin2, Ctnnb1 and Tcf3 in response to Rev-Erb knockdown in cultured C2C12 myoblasts. (B) Expression of the Wnt target genes ...

Discussion

Muscular dystrophy is a devastating muscle wasting disease that has no restorative clinical treatment. Previous work has shown that the circadian clock influences muscle repair and demonstrated the REV-ERB antagonists can be utilized to promote regenerative repair during acute injury22,23,26,50,51. This led us to test the therapeutic utility of a REV-ERB antagonist in a mouse muscular dystrophy model. Overall, we found that SR8278 effectively stabilized lean mass, improved SkM function, reduced fibrosis and stimulated SkM repair and mitochondrial biogenesis in dystrophic muscle.

Our investigation also revealed that mdx mice treated with SR8278 displayed lower intramuscular fibrosis. Fibrotic tissue deposits, the result of excessive buildup of extracellular matrix components into the bedding of muscle fibers, forms a mechanical barrier that restricts the formation of neuronal synapses and blocks myoblast expansion to repair damaged myofibers52. Pro-inflammatory M1 macrophages are one of the first innate immune cells to respond to muscle injury and are considered key to the healing process53. Conversely, anti-inflammatory M2 macrophages secrete a variety of growth factors that stimulate fibrogenesis. TGF-β is a well characterized factor that stimulates the switching of pro-inflammatory macrophages into the M2 anti-inflammatory phenotype54. Notably, in pre-brown adipocytes, REV-ERB can promote differentiation by suppressing the TGF-β/Smad2 pathway55. REV-ERB is also a well-characterized transcriptional regulator of macrophage activity54,56,57. It is however unknown whether TGF-β activity in macrophages is influenced by REV-ERB. Based on the inhibitory affect SR8278 had on intramuscular fibrosis, our observations suggest that SR8278 inhibition may be promoting pro-inflammatory M1 macrophage activity. However, whether REV-ERB can regulate muscle fibrosis by selecting for an M1 macrophage phenotype within the SkM microenvironment should be the subject of future investigations.

Muscle degradation is mediated by a collection of exogenous and endogenous factors that stimulate proteolysis. The E3 ubiquitin ligases MURF-1 and MAFbx tag myogenic factors and structural proteins for proteasomal degradation. Our investigations revealed that SR8278 decreased the expression of MURF-1 and MAF-BX in the soleus muscle. TNFα and IL-6 are both known myokines that induce muscle degradation by activating MURF-1 and MAF-BX. Previously it has been shown that the overexpression of Rev-erbα sensitized smooth muscle cells to TNFα and increased IL-6 expression58. It is not yet known if REV-ERBα or REV-ERBβ can induce myokine secretion, however, ablating CLOCK expression with siRNAs modulates myokine expression including IL-6 in human myotubes59. Further studies should be designed to determine if REV-ERB can modulate IL-6 secretion from myofibers.

Myogenic response factors are master regulators of SkM regeneration. We observed a robust increase of myogenic response factor expression, suggesting REV-ERB antagonism mediated muscle regeneration in mdx SkM. Bmal1 expression, a direct REV-ERB target gene has been associated with the stimulation of muscle repair through activation of Wnt signaling. We speculated therefore that REV-ERB may also regulate Wnt signaling in SkM. Our results suggest that REV-ERB can regulate Wnt signaling by stabilizing CTNNB1 downstream of Wnt receptor activation. Whether cross talk between REV-ERB and Wnt signaling pathways in muscle is dependent on Bmal or other circadian factors remains to be determined.

In mdx muscle the SC population was also increased by pharmacological inhibition of REV-ERB. Investigations by Chaterjee et al. showed that Bmal1 deficient mice displayed a reduction in Pax7+ SC through a yet to be described mechanism22,23. As REV-ERB is a repressor of Bmal1 transcription, our results suggest that SR8278 may be inducing SC self-renewal through Bmal1. However, in this and other studies, the observed effects of REV-ERB antagonism are more pleiotropic than can be accounted for by BMAL1 and CLOCK regulated transcription and appear to be directed more by tissue specific factors such as Nuclear Factor-Y and Hepatocyte Nuclear Factor 626,60. However, whether the circadian clock is integral to the process of REV-ERB directed muscle repair is unclear. RNA seq analysis of muscle samples from patients with collagen VI myopathies have linked aberrant circadian regulation to deregulation of autophagy genes, with the effect on collagen VI regulation mirrored in Bmal1 knockout mice61. While the contributions of diurnal fluctuations to muscle turnover have been identified22,23,62 it is uncertain what circadian factors contribute to DMD dystrophinopathy.

Mitochondrial dysfunction, defined by lower energy capacity and high ROS production, are secondary physiological features of DMD that further exacerbate the dystrophic phenotype63,64. Activation of mitochondrial biogenesis and a switch to oxidative fiber types have been shown to help ameliorate dystrophic decline in mdx mouse models65,66. The effects of a REV-ERB antagonist on mitochondrial biogenesis and oxidative capacity were previously unknown. Here, SR8278 increased the expression of mitochondrial biogenesis genes and ushered a switch to enhanced oxidative fiber activity in dystrophic SkM. In contrast, previous studies investigating REV-ERB ligands in SkM found that activating the receptor increased oxidative gene expression and stimulated mitochondrial biogenesis in mouse muscle50. REV-ERB expression decreases during muscle differentiation and its expression has been shown to inhibit myotube formation26,28. Conversely, Nr1d1 knockout mice have reduced skeletal muscle function and reduced lean mass. It has been demonstrated that REV-ERB promoter occupancy is distinct in differentiating and fully differentiated myoblasts26. The regulation of mitochondrial biogenesis and oxidative metabolism by REV-ERBs may therefore be dependent on the dynamics of REV-ERB promoter/enhancing binding in proliferating versus fully differentiated muscle. It is also important to note that muscle pathophysiology is also distinct in normal versus dystrophic mice. Dystrophic muscle undergoes rapid cycles of SkM destruction and repair that does not occur in normal differentiated muscle. Considering mitochondrial biogenesis is substantially elevated during muscle differentiation, it is possible that REV-ERB ligands may stimulate mitochondrial biogenesis through distinct or context specific mechanisms. Our results certainly affirm that REV-ERB antagonists enhance mitochondrial activity by inducing mitochondrial biogenesis factor expression. The underlying mechanisms that may drive the varied activity of REV-ERB and its ligands in different models remain undefined. Nevertheless, this investigation highlights that targeted inhibition of REV-ERB activity may be a highly effective approach for treating muscular dystrophies.

Methods

Mice

C57BL/10ScSn-Dmdmdx/J (mdx) mice were purchased from Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, ME). All mice were housed in a 12h-12h light-dark cycle and received a standard chow diet. Mice were allowed food and water ad libitum. Mdx mice (n = 10) were dosed once a day by subcutaneous injections for 6-weeks. SR8278 (25 mg/kg) was dissolved in a 5:5:90 DMSO/cremophor/PBS vehicle. At the conclusion of the study mice were sacrificed by CO2 asphyxiation, followed by cervical dislocation. Mouse experimental procedures were approved by the Saint Louis University Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (SLU-IACUC protocol#2474). All procedures were performed in accordance with the SLU-IACUC guidelines and regulations.

Body Composition Analysis

Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) analyses were conducted once a week on mdx mice from 10-week old (n = 10 per group) until 16 weeks of age by utilizing a Bruker BioSpin LF50 Body Composition Analyzer (Bruker, Billerica, Massachusetts). Statistically significant differences in lean, fat and fluid mass were determined by 2-way ANOVA with an alpha set at 0.05.

Grip Strength

Hind limb and forelimb grip strength was tested simultaneously with a digital force instrument (BIOSEB) as described previously67. At 16 weeks of age mdx mice (n = 10) were subjected to 3 grip strength tests with a minimum of 10-minute rest intervals between each test. To reduce user-specific bias, each blinded researcher (2 total) administered tests on two separate cohorts of mice. Measured values from these experiments were pooled and analyzed. Statistical significance between the respected groups was determined using an unpaired, two-tailed student’s t-test with an alpha set at 0.05.

Blood Plasma Chemistry Analysis

For all in vivo experiments mouse blood samples were collected via cardiac puncture and isolated plasma was analyzed by the COBAS c311 system (Roche) assay kit for liver enzymes. Data was subjected to a student’s t-test.

Immunohistochemistry

Muscle samples from mdx mice where frozen in OCT. Muscle samples were sectioned at 10 microns and blocked with 5% donkey, 1% BSA, 0.25% Tween20 for 30 minutes at room temperature. A rabbit polyclonal anti-Pax7 (dilution1:500; Abcam ab34360, Cambridge, UK) was incubated overnight at 4 °C in a humidity chamber. Secondary (anti-rabbit Cy3 1:100) was incubated for 1 hour in a humidity chamber at room temperature. The tissues were blocked again with 5% Rabbit serum in 1x PBS with 1% BSA, 2hrs in a humidity chamber at room temperature. Rabbit polyclonal anti-Laminin (dilution1:500; Sigma-Aldrich L9393, St. Louis, MO) was incubated overnight at 4 °C in a humidity chamber. Secondary AB (anti-Rb 488 1:300) was incubated at room temperature for an hour in a humidity chamber. The muscle tissue was then exposed to 4% paraformaldehyde for 10 minutes at room temperature. Prolong gold with DAPI was added and the slides were cover slipped. Pax7 + satellite cells where identified by co-localization with laminin. Relative Pax7 + satellite cell numbers where quantified by utilizing ImageJ software described previously6.

Masson’s Trichrome

Diaphragm muscle samples were fixed overnight in 4% formalin and then embedded in paraffin. Muscle samples where sectioned and stained. Paraffin embedded muscle sections where stained using a Masson’s trichrome staining procedure. Staining was quantified using ImageJ as described previously6.

H&E Staining

Muscle samples (gastrocnemius) were fixed overnight in 4% formalin and then embedded in paraffin. Paraffin embedded muscle sections where stained by a standard hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) protocol (Histowiz, Brooklyn NY). Slide images were taken by a Leica MC120 HD (Buffalo Grove, IL) attached to a Leica DM750 microscope (Buffalo Grove, IL).

Picrosirius Red

Gastrocnemius samples were fixed overnight in 4% formalin and then embedded in paraffin. Paraffin embedded muscle sections where stained by a standard picrosirius red staining protocol (Histowiz, Brooklyn NY). Slide images were taken by a Leica MC120 HD (Buffalo Grove, IL) attached to a Leica DM750 microscope (Buffalo Grove, IL). Staining was quantified using ImageJ as described previously6.

Succinate Dehydrogenase Staining

Fresh cryo-sections (10 μm) were incubated for 30 min at 37 °C in incubation medium (50 mM phosphate buffer, sodium succinate 13.5 mg/ml, NBT 10 mg/ml in water) placed in a Coplin Jar and then rinsed section in PBS. After staining, sections were fixed in 10% formalin-PBS solution for 5 minutes at room temperature and then rinsed in 15% alcohol for 5 minutes. Slides were mounted with an aqueous medium and sealed.

Fiber Type Immunostaining

10 μm frozen sections were incubated with Mouse on Mouse IgG Blocking (Vector Lab) for 1 h at room temperature then washed 2 times in PBS. Sections were then incubated with a mixture of BA-D5 (Myosin Heavy Chain Type I), SC-71 (Myosin Heavy Chain Type IIa), BF-F3 (Myosin Heavy Chain Type IIb) (Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank) for 45 min at 37 °C, in PBS-1%BSA. Sections were washed 3 times in PBS for 5 minutes at room temperature and then incubated with a mixture of the following secondary antibodies: anti-mouse IgG2b-Alexa405, IgG1-Alexa488, IgM-Alexa594 (ThermoFisher), all made in goat, diluted in PBS-1%BSA, for 30 minutes at 37 °C. Sections were washed for 5 minutes, 3 times with PBS at room temperature and mounted with ProLong Gold (Invitrogen).

Quantitative PCR

Total RNA was isolated from muscle tissue by using the Trizol reagent (Invitrogen) and a PureLink RNA Mini Kit (Ambion) for C2C12 and human primary cells. Isolated RNA (1 μg) was reverse transcribed into cDNA by using qScript cDNA Synthesis Kit (Quanta Biosciences, Inc.). Primer sequences were designed using IDT primer design (Coralville, IA). Quantitative PCR (qPCR) was performed with SYBR Select Master Mix (Applied Biosystems) with select primers. Gene expression for mouse tissue and cells were normalized to Gapdh.

Immunoblotting

Cells and muscle tissues were lysed using RIPA buffer with protease inhibitors. The extracted proteins were flash frozen and stored at −80 °C. Proteins were resolved by SDS-PAGE and transferred onto PVDF membranes (Bio-Rad). Membranes were blocked with 2% bovine serum albumin (BSA) for 1 hour at room temperature. Membranes were rinsed and incubated with primary antibodies over night at 4 °C. Primary antibodies utilized for immunostaining were rabbit monoclonal myosin heavy chain 2 (dilution 1:1000; Abcam ab91506, Cambridge, UK), mouse monoclonal myosin heavy chain 1 (dilution 1:2000; Abcam ab11083, Cambridge, UK), rabbit polyclonal anti-MURF-1 (dilution 1:1000, Abcam ab77577, Cambridge, UK), rabbit polyclonal anti-MAFbx (dilution 1:1000, Santa Cruz Biotechnology sc-33782, Dallas, Texas), rabbit polyclonal anti-Myod1 (dilution1:500; Abcam ab64159, Cambridge, UK), rabbit polyclonal anti-Myf5 (dilution 1:500, Santa Cruz Biotechnology sc-302, Dallas, Texas), mouse monoclonal anti-Myogenin (dilution 1:500, Santa Cruz Biotechnology sc-12732, Dallas, Texas), mouse monoclonal anti-Myosin Heavy Chain 3 (dilution 1:500, Santa Cruz Biotechnology sc-53091, Dallas, Texas), rabbit monoclonal anti-Axin2 (dilution 1:1000, Cell Signaling Technology 2151 S, Danvers, Massachusetts), rabbit polyclonal anti-p-βcatenin ser37 (dilution 1:1000, Santa Cruz Biotechnology sc-101651, Dallas, Texas), rabbit polyclonal anti-βcatenin (dilution 1:1000, Santa Cruz Biotechnology sc-1496R, Dallas, Texas), mouse monoclonal anti-β-actin HRP linked (dilution1:5000; Abcam ab20272, Cambridge, UK), rabbit polyclonal anti-PGC1α (dilution 1:200, Santa Cruz Biotechnology sc-1307, Dallas, Texas), and rabbit polyclonal anti-TFAM (dilution 1:500, Abcam ab131607, Cambridge, UK). Secondary HRP linked antibodies (dilution 1:3000, Abcam, Cambridge, UK) were incubated for 1 hour at room temperature. Chemiluminescence (Thermo Fisher Scientific) detection was conducted by MP ChemiDoc (Bio-Rad). The quantification of target protein was conducted in Image Lab software (Bio-Rad). The density ratios of target protein were normalized to β-actin levels.

C2C12 Cell Culture

C2C12 cells were purchased from ATCC (Manassas, Virginia). Passage 3–7 C2C12 mouse myoblasts were proliferated in 15% fetal bovine serum in Gibco Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM) supplemented with GlutaMAX. Cells were incubated at 37 °C in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2. Cells were split when 50–60% confluent. Before differentiation, 90% confluent C2C12 cells were exposed to 5 μM of SR8278 or SR9011 for 24 hours in 15% FBS. Cells were then induced to differentiate by exchanging the proliferation media with fusion media (2% horse serum in Gibco DMEM). RNA extraction was conducted by lysing the cells with 350uL of Ambion Lysis buffer. Cells were frozen and mRNA extraction and purification conducted in accordance to protocol.

Lentiviral Infection and Induction of shRNAs

SMARTvector Lentiviral Mouse Nr1d1 (or Nr1d2) mCMV-TurboGFP shRNA by Dharmacon RNAi Technologies (Lafayette, CO) were allowed to infect 15,000 proliferating C2C12 cells for 48 hours. Cells were split and seeded at a density of 15,000 in six-well plates. Twenty-four hours later cell selection was conducted by exposing the cells to 4 μg/mL of puromyocin. The shRNA mediated knock down of Nr1d1 or Nr1d2 in C2C12 cells was induced by doxycycline (1 μg/mL) exposure for 48 hours in select media (fusion or proliferation). Gene expression was utilized to assess targeted knock down when compared to a GFP expressing only control cell line.

Wnt Modulators

After 48 hours of differentiating, cells where exposed to 5uM of SR8278 in a DMSO vehicle with or without the presence of LiCl (10 mM, Sigma Aldrich) or WntC59 (100uM, Bio-Techne) for 48 hours. The media with ligand and/or wnt modulators where replenished every 24 hours. The C2C12 cells were then lysed and their RNA isolated for future qPCR analysis.

Data Availability Statement

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article (and its Supplementary Information files).

Electronic supplementary material

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Dr. Grant Kolar in the department of Pathology and Saint Louis University for providing assistance with the histological and immuno-histochemical assays conducted herein. This work was supported by a grant from the National Institutes of Health (MH093429, T.P.B.).

Author Contributions

Author Contributions

R.D.W. performed experiments, analyzed data and aided in the writing of the manuscript, A.C.V. and C.B. performed experiments and analyzed data, T.P.B., analyzed data and interpreted results, C.A.F. conceived the study, designed and performed experiments and wrote the manuscript.

Notes

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Footnotes

Electronic supplementary material

Supplementary information accompanies this paper at 10.1038/s41598-017-17496-7.

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

1. Ryder S, et al. The burden, epidemiology, costs and treatment for Duchenne muscular dystrophy: an evidence review. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2017;12:79. doi: 10.1186/s13023-017-0631-3. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
2. Braun R, Wang Z, Mack DL, Childers MK. Gene therapy for inherited muscle diseases: where genetics meets rehabilitation medicine. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2014;93:S97–107. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000000138. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
3. Bach JR, Martinez D. Duchenne muscular dystrophy: continuous noninvasive ventilatory support prolongs survival. Respir Care. 2011;56:744–750. doi: 10.4187/respcare.00831. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
4. Lapidos KA, Kakkar R, McNally EM. The dystrophin glycoprotein complex: signaling strength and integrity for the sarcolemma. Circ Res. 2004;94:1023–1031. doi: 10.1161/01.RES.0000126574.61061.25. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
5. Khurana TS, Davies KE. Pharmacological strategies for muscular dystrophy. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2003;2:379–390. doi: 10.1038/nrd1085. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
6. Peverelli L, et al. Histologic muscular history in steroid-treated and untreated patients with Duchenne dystrophy. Neurology. 2015;85:1886–1893. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000002147. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
7. Ricotti V, et al. Long-term benefits and adverse effects of intermittent versus daily glucocorticoids in boys with Duchenne muscular dystrophy. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2013;84:698–705. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2012-303902. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
8. Malik V, Rodino-Klapac LR, Mendell JR. Emerging drugs for Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Expert Opin Emerg Drugs. 2012;17:261–277. doi: 10.1517/14728214.2012.691965. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
9. Gee P, Xu H, Hotta A. Cellular Reprogramming, Genome Editing, and Alternative CRISPR Cas9 Technologies for Precise Gene Therapy of Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy. Stem Cells Int. 2017;2017:8765154. doi: 10.1155/2017/8765154. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
10. Pini V, Morgan JE, Muntoni F, O’Neill HC. Genome Editing and Muscle Stem Cells as a Therapeutic Tool for Muscular Dystrophies. Curr Stem Cell Rep. 2017;3:137–148. doi: 10.1007/s40778-017-0076-6. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
11. Sharma A, et al. Autologous bone marrow mononuclear cell transplantation in Duchenne muscular dystrophy - a case report. Am J Case Rep. 2014;15:128–134. doi: 10.12659/AJCR.890078. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
12. Nakamura A, et al. Comparison of the phenotypes of patients harboring in-frame deletions starting at exon 45 in the Duchenne muscular dystrophy gene indicates potential for the development of exon skipping therapy. J Hum Genet. 2017;62:459–463. doi: 10.1038/jhg.2016.152. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
13. Nakamura A. Moving towards successful exon-skipping therapy for Duchenne muscular dystrophy. J Hum Genet. 2017 [PubMed]
14. Kole R, Krieg AM. Exon skipping therapy for Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2015;87:104–107. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2015.05.008. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
15. Lim KR, Maruyama R, Yokota T. Eteplirsen in the treatment of Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Drug Des Devel Ther. 2017;11:533–545. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S97635. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
16. Reinig AM, Mirzaei S, Berlau DJ. Advances in the Treatment of Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy: New and Emerging Pharmacotherapies. Pharmacotherapy. 2017;37:492–499. doi: 10.1002/phar.1909. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
17. McDonald CM, et al. Ataluren in patients with nonsense mutation Duchenne muscular dystrophy (ACT DMD): a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2017 [PubMed]
18. Ryan NJ. Ataluren: first global approval. Drugs. 2014;74:1709–1714. doi: 10.1007/s40265-014-0287-4. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
19. Roy B, et al. Ataluren stimulates ribosomal selection of near-cognate tRNAs to promote nonsense suppression. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2016;113:12508–12513. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1605336113. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
20. Kojetin DJ, Burris TP. REV-ERB and ROR nuclear receptors as drug targets. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2014;13:197–216. doi: 10.1038/nrd4100. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
21. Yin L, et al. Rev-erbalpha, a heme sensor that coordinates metabolic and circadian pathways. Science. 2007;318:1786–1789. doi: 10.1126/science.1150179. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
22. Chatterjee S, Yin H, Nam D, Li Y, Ma K. Brain and muscle Arnt-like 1 promotes skeletal muscle regeneration through satellite cell expansion. Exp Cell Res. 2015;331:200–210. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2014.08.041. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
23. Chatterjee S, et al. Brain and muscle Arnt-like 1 is a key regulator of myogenesis. J Cell Sci. 2013;126:2213–2224. doi: 10.1242/jcs.120519. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
24. McDearmon EL, et al. Dissecting the functions of the mammalian clock protein BMAL1 by tissue-specific rescue in mice. Science. 2006;314:1304–1308. doi: 10.1126/science.1132430. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
25. Crumbley C, Burris TP. Direct regulation of CLOCK expression by REV-ERB. PLoS One. 2011;6:e17290. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0017290. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
26. Welch RD, et al. Rev-Erb co-regulates muscle regeneration via tethered interaction with the NF-Y cistrome. Mol Metab. 2017;6:703–714. doi: 10.1016/j.molmet.2017.05.001. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
27. Downes M, Carozzi AJ, Muscat GE. Constitutive expression of the orphan receptor, Rev-erbA alpha, inhibits muscle differentiation and abrogates the expression of the myoD gene family. Mol Endocrinol. 1995;9:1666–1678. [PubMed]
28. Burke L, Downes M, Carozzi A, Giguere V, Muscat GE. Transcriptional repression by the orphan steroid receptor RVR/Rev-erb beta is dependent on the signature motif and helix 5 in the E region: functional evidence for a biological role of RVR in myogenesis. Nucleic Acids Res. 1996;24:3481–3489. doi: 10.1093/nar/24.18.3481. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
29. Kojetin D, Wang Y, Kamenecka TM, Burris TP. Identification of SR8278, a synthetic antagonist of the nuclear heme receptor REV-ERB. ACS Chem Biol. 2011;6:131–134. doi: 10.1021/cb1002575. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
30. Rybalka E, Timpani CA, Cooke MB, Williams AD, Hayes A. Defects in mitochondrial ATP synthesis in dystrophin-deficient mdx skeletal muscles may be caused by complex I insufficiency. PLoS One. 2014;9:e115763. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0115763. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
31. Church JE, et al. Alterations in Notch signalling in skeletal muscles from mdx and dko dystrophic mice and patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Exp Physiol. 2014;99:675–687. doi: 10.1113/expphysiol.2013.077255. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
32. Bjornson CR, et al. Notch signaling is necessary to maintain quiescence in adult muscle stem cells. Stem Cells. 2012;30:232–242. doi: 10.1002/stem.773. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
33. Kitamoto T, Hanaoka K. Notch3 null mutation in mice causes muscle hyperplasia by repetitive muscle regeneration. Stem Cells. 2010;28:2205–2216. doi: 10.1002/stem.547. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
34. Rudolf A, et al. beta-Catenin Activation in Muscle Progenitor Cells Regulates Tissue Repair. Cell Rep. 2016;15:1277–1290. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2016.04.022. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
35. von Maltzahn J, Chang NC, Bentzinger CF, Rudnicki MA. Wnt signaling in myogenesis. Trends Cell Biol. 2012;22:602–609. doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2012.07.008. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
36. Huraskin D, et al. Wnt/beta-catenin signaling via Axin2 is required for myogenesis and, together with YAP/Taz and Tead1, active in IIa/IIx muscle fibers. Development. 2016;143:3128–3142. doi: 10.1242/dev.139907. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
37. Parisi A, et al. APC is required for muscle stem cell proliferation and skeletal muscle tissue repair. J Cell Biol. 2015;210:717–726. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201501053. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
38. Figeac N, Zammit PS. Coordinated action of Axin1 and Axin2 suppresses beta-catenin to regulate muscle stem cell function. Cell Signal. 2015;27:1652–1665. doi: 10.1016/j.cellsig.2015.03.025. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
39. von Maltzahn J, Renaud JM, Parise G, Rudnicki MA. Wnt7a treatment ameliorates muscular dystrophy. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2012;109:20614–20619. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1215765109. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
40. Tanaka S, Terada K, Nohno T. Canonical Wnt signaling is involved in switching from cell proliferation to myogenic differentiation of mouse myoblast cells. J Mol Signal. 2011;6:12. doi: 10.1186/1750-2187-6-12. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
41. Le Grand F, Jones AE, Seale V, Scime A, Rudnicki MA. Wnt7a activates the planar cell polarity pathway to drive the symmetric expansion of satellite stem cells. Cell Stem Cell. 2009;4:535–547. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2009.03.013. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
42. Cirillo F, et al. Activation of the hypoxia-inducible factor 1alpha promotes myogenesis through the noncanonical Wnt pathway, leading to hypertrophic myotubes. FASEB J. 2017;31:2146–2156. doi: 10.1096/fj.201600878R. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
43. Han XH, Jin YR, Seto M, Yoon JK. A WNT/beta-catenin signaling activator, R-spondin, plays positive regulatory roles during skeletal myogenesis. J Biol Chem. 2011;286:10649–10659. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110.169391. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
44. Otto A, et al. Canonical Wnt signalling induces satellite-cell proliferation during adult skeletal muscle regeneration. J Cell Sci. 2008;121:2939–2950. doi: 10.1242/jcs.026534. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
45. Seale P, Polesskaya A, Rudnicki MA. Adult stem cell specification by Wnt signaling in muscle regeneration. Cell Cycle. 2003;2:418–419. doi: 10.4161/cc.2.5.498. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
46. Bonaldo P, Sandri M. Cellular and molecular mechanisms of muscle atrophy. Dis Model Mech. 2013;6:25–39. doi: 10.1242/dmm.010389. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
47. Bodine SC, Baehr LM. Skeletal muscle atrophy and the E3 ubiquitin ligases MuRF1 and MAFbx/atrogin-1. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2014;307:E469–484. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.00204.2014. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
48. Foletta VC, White LJ, Larsen AE, Leger B, Russell AP. The role and regulation of MAFbx/atrogin-1 and MuRF1 in skeletal muscle atrophy. Pflugers Arch. 2011;461:325–335. doi: 10.1007/s00424-010-0919-9. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
49. Proffitt KD, et al. Pharmacological inhibition of the Wnt acyltransferase PORCN prevents growth of WNT-driven mammary cancer. Cancer Res. 2013;73:502–507. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-12-2258. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
50. Woldt E, et al. Rev-erb-alpha modulates skeletal muscle oxidative capacity by regulating mitochondrial biogenesis and autophagy. Nat Med. 2013;19:1039–1046. doi: 10.1038/nm.3213. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
51. Ramakrishnan SN, Lau P, Burke LJ, Muscat GE. Rev-erbbeta regulates the expression of genes involved in lipid absorption in skeletal muscle cells: evidence for cross-talk between orphan nuclear receptors and myokines. J Biol Chem. 2005;280:8651–8659. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M413949200. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
52. Garg K, Corona BT, Walters TJ. Therapeutic strategies for preventing skeletal muscle fibrosis after injury. Front Pharmacol. 2015;6:87. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2015.00087. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
53. Tidball JG, Villalta SA. Regulatory interactions between muscle and the immune system during muscle regeneration. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2010;298:R1173–1187. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.00735.2009. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
54. Arnold L, et al. Inflammatory monocytes recruited after skeletal muscle injury switch into antiinflammatory macrophages to support myogenesis. J Exp Med. 2007;204:1057–1069. doi: 10.1084/jem.20070075. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
55. Nam D, et al. Novel Function of Rev-erbalpha in Promoting Brown Adipogenesis. Sci Rep. 2015;5:11239. doi: 10.1038/srep11239. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
56. Eichenfield, D. Z. et al. Tissue damage drives co-localization of NF-kappaB, Smad3, and Nrf2 to direct Rev-erb sensitive wound repair in mouse macrophages. Elife5, doi:10.7554/eLife.13024 (2016). [PMC free article] [PubMed]
57. Lam MT, et al. Rev-Erbs repress macrophage gene expression by inhibiting enhancer-directed transcription. Nature. 2013;498:511–515. doi: 10.1038/nature12209. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
58. Migita H, Morser J, Kawai K. Rev-erbalpha upregulates NF-kappaB-responsive genes in vascular smooth muscle cells. FEBS Lett. 2004;561:69–74. doi: 10.1016/S0014-5793(04)00118-8. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
59. Perrin L, et al. Human skeletal myotubes display a cell-autonomous circadian clock implicated in basal myokine secretion. Mol Metab. 2015;4:834–845. doi: 10.1016/j.molmet.2015.07.009. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
60. Zhang Y, et al. GENE REGULATION. Discrete functions of nuclear receptor Rev-erbalpha couple metabolism to the clock. Science. 2015;348:1488–1492. doi: 10.1126/science.aab3021. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
61. Scotton C, et al. Deep RNA profiling identified CLOCK and molecular clock genes as pathophysiological signatures in collagen VI myopathy. J Cell Sci. 2016;129:1671–1684. doi: 10.1242/jcs.175927. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
62. Nakao R, et al. Atypical expression of circadian clock genes in denervated mouse skeletal muscle. Chronobiol Int. 2015;32:486–496. doi: 10.3109/07420528.2014.1003350. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
63. Pant M, et al. Metabolic dysfunction and altered mitochondrial dynamics in the utrophin-dystrophin deficient mouse model of duchenne muscular dystrophy. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0123875. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0123875. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
64. Vila MC, et al. Mitochondria mediate cell membrane repair and contribute to Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Cell Death Differ. 2017;24:330–342. doi: 10.1038/cdd.2016.127. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
65. Chalkiadaki A, Igarashi M, Nasamu AS, Knezevic J, Guarente L. Muscle-specific SIRT1 gain-of-function increases slow-twitch fibers and ameliorates pathophysiology in a mouse model of duchenne muscular dystrophy. PLoS Genet. 2014;10:e1004490. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1004490. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
66. Schiavone M, et al. Alisporivir rescues defective mitochondrial respiration in Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Pharmacol Res. 2017;125:122–131. doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2017.09.001. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
67. Mandillo S, et al. Reliability, robustness, and reproducibility in mouse behavioral phenotyping: a cross-laboratory study. Physiol Genomics. 2008;34:243–255. doi: 10.1152/physiolgenomics.90207.2008. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group