|Home | About | Journals | Submit | Contact Us | Français|
Sequence diversity and immunodominance are major obstacles in the design of an effective vaccine against HIV. HIV Env is a highly-glycosylated protein composed of ‘conserved’ and ‘variable’ regions. The latter contains immunodominant epitopes that are frequently targeted by the immune system resulting in the generation of immune escape variants. This work describes 12 regions in HIV Env that are highly conserved throughout the known HIV M Group sequences (Env CE), and are poorly immunogenic in macaques vaccinated with full-length Env expressing DNA vaccines. Two versions of plasmids encoding the 12 Env CE were generated, differing by 0–5 AA per CE to maximize the inclusion of commonly detected variants. In contrast to the full-length env DNA vaccine, vaccination of macaques with a combination of these 2 Env CE DNA induced robust, durable cellular immune responses with a significant fraction of CD8+ T cells with cytotoxic phenotype (Granzyme B+ and CD107a+). Although inefficient in generating primary responses to the CE, boosting of the Env CE DNA primed macaques with the intact env DNA vaccine potently augmented pre-existing immunity, increasing magnitude, breadth and cytotoxicity of the cellular responses. Fine mapping showed that 7 of the 12 CE elicited T cell responses. Env CE DNA also induced humoral responses able to recognize the full-length Env. Env CE plasmids are therefore capable of inducing durable responses to highly conserved regions of Env that are frequently absent after Env vaccination or immunologically subdominant. These modified antigens are candidates for use as prophylactic and therapeutic HIV vaccines.
The variability of HIV is a major stumbling block for the design of a universal vaccine. The plasticity of HIV allows for an enormous number of viable mutant strains, which in turn allows the virus to escape from immune responses while preserving viral function. Presentation of variable epitopes results in immune response easily overcome by virus mutation and escape. Immunodominance (i.e., hierarchical preference for recognition of one epitope of the vaccine over another) and generation of immune responses targeting non-protective epitopes can interfere or even suppress responses toward conserved, and ideally protective, segments in the viral proteome. Non-protective epitopes are those whose recognition is associated with a lack of virologic containment in vivo (e.g., high viral load) or those that can readily escape without impairing viral fitness. Immunodominant epitopes with a high degree of conservation do not necessarily confer immune control of viral replication, as they may represent viral adaptation to human HLA types at the population level, and at minimal fitness cost.1-3 It seems likely that if HIV segments were capable of mutating without limiting virus functionality, they would not contribute substantially to a vaccine's protective response. Variable epitopes could serve as immunodominant “decoys” that can absorb immune reactivity and potentially preclude responses against protective epitopes. The mechanism responsible for the immunodominance of the variable regions is poorly understood but, clearly, provides an advantage for the persistence of the virus. For example, the most significant difference between HIV strains infecting vaccine vs. placebo recipients in the Step (HVTN 502) vaccine trial occurred within a region including the SLYNTVATL epitope in Gag,4 an immunodominant epitope, and immune responses to which are not associated with diminution of viral load.5 The SLYNTVATL reactivity may therefore represent an immunodominant decoy response that is detrimental to vaccine efficacy.6
HIV vaccine immunogens have generally been derived from individual viral isolates. It may not be possible in a vaccine to cover all the viral antigenic diversity required to block viable or transition escape forms of the virus—as rapid, sequential epitope evolution, including uncommon intermediates, is commonplace early in infection.7,8 The immunogen sequence diversity that may be required to block viable or transition escape mutants may be too large to accommodate for a single or a manageably sized variation inclusive vaccine. To maximize immunologic breadth, different strategies are being explored to block common escape forms of viruses and thus effectively block immunological escape pathways that (i) use consensus and deduced ancestral sequences,9-11 and (ii) create antigenic combinations of common variants that evolve as a result of immune pressure (e.g., mosaics12-14,15 and similar structures.16,17 We18-21 and others22-25 have designed vaccine approaches aiming to focus the immune responses to conserved regions of the virus.
We previously reported the generation of novel immunogens that focus the immune responses to conserved regions in HIV gag.19,20 These Conserved Elements (CE) were defined based on stringent conservation, functional importance and independence of ‘protective’ haplotypes associated with HIV control.26-29 In this report, we expanded this vaccine strategy to include conserved regions of Env. We continue to use DNA as vaccine platform since it has several advantages such as simplicity, scalability and possibility for repeated applications due to the lack of immunity against the vector. The combination of DNA intramuscular delivery following by in vivo electroporation has induced promising immune responses in macaques and in humans (reviewed in30, 31).
Sequence data set and amino acid database frequencies. Full-length HIV-1 group M Env coding sequences were downloaded from the HIV database (HIVDB, http://www.hiv.lanl.gov/). Any sequences with hypermutations32 early stop codons, frame-shift mutations or ambiguous amino acids were excluded. A multiple sequence alignment was prepared using MUSCLE33 and then manually edited. The database frequency of each amino acid at each site in the final alignment was then calculated using a perl script (http://indra.mullins.microbiol.washington.edu/perlscript/docs/CountAAFreq.html). The degree of conservation required for inclusion as an Env CE was at least 90% across the entire HIV-1 M group, and usually at least 98%. Regions for inclusion/exclusion from the vaccine were also selected based on whether immune responses to such regions were associated with virologic control or lack of control, and whether mutations at a given site had been shown to result in a loss of viral fitness ex vivo. Other features that resulted in a relaxation of the 90% requirement was an association with known function or CTL escape resulting in a loss in viral fitness, or to substantially extend the length of a CE. For example, the CD4 binding loop region of the HIV Env protein corresponds to a region that binds to broadly neutralizing antibodies and this region is included as CE10. To include this region, 7 toggle sites were used and one residue was included in CE10 without a toggle that had a conservation level of only 79%. In another example, a very long CE (CE14; 43 AA) was included by allowing 5 toggle sites and one residue was conserved only at a level of 84% across the HIV-1 M group. However, this site was conserved at 97% and 99% in HIV-1 M group subtypes B and C and no obvious toggle site was required. A set of 12 conserved elements (CE) was identified in the HIV Env protein (Table 1) spanning 11, 14, 21, 15, 23, 21, 13, 12, 14, 43, 20, and 13 AA in length. The localization of the CE within HXB2 Env as reference is shown (Table 1). Toggle sites were used to create 2 versions of all the CE, except CE6 (gray shaded in Table 1). A toggle site represents an amino acid site at which conservation may be low but at which 2 amino acids combined account for most of sequences of all HIV-1 M group sequences known, usually 98–100%. HIV-1 M group subtypes B, primarily found in the Americas and Western Europe, and subtype C primarily found in South Africa and India, represent most of the available sequence data, and together they represent > 60% of all HIV-1 infections. Toggle sites often represent AA that are highly conserved in either subtype B or C, and the Env CE1 and CE2 sequences correspond to the AA most associated with subtypes B and C, respectively, if the consensus or second most common variant residues differed.
The immunogenicity of the 12 CE identified within HIV env was evaluated in samples from 16 macaques vaccinated with DNA expressing intact Env as part of other studies (Table 2). The animals received a mixture of clade B (including BaL) and C env DNA administered via the IM route followed by in vivo electroporation. PBMC collected 2 weeks after the 2nd or 3rd vaccination were stimulated with (i) Env-specific peptide pools (15-mer peptides overlapping by 11 AA derived from BaL) spanning the complete Env and (ii) a CE-specific peptide pool consisting of 10-mer peptides overlapping by 9 AA and 15-mer peptides overlapping by 11 AA designed to maximize the detection of CD4+ and CD8+ T cell responses (Table 2). Fig. 1 displays the CE- and Env-specific T cell responses in these animals ranked according to the magnitude of Env-specific responses, and the presence or lack of CE-specific responses. Despite mounting robust Env-specific T cell reponses, ~50% of the macaques failed to develop Env CE-specific responses (Fig. 1). The absence of CE-specific T cell responses was not related to the number of vaccinations (2 or 3) or the form of Env used in the vaccine (gp160, soluble trimeric gp140 or membrane-associated gp145 (Table 2). Comparison of the magnitude of the T cell responses to gp120 Env and CE further showed that, expect one animal (T145), there is a skewing of the responses toward gp120, indicating that the majority of the responses target epitopes in the more variable regions. Mapping of individual Env CE responses in 5 of the animals (using 12 individual peptides pools covering both Env CE variants) showed that only 1 or 2 CE were recognized (Table 3). These data indicate that the 12 Env CE are poorly immunogenic when present within the complete Env protein, perhaps due to immunological interference with other epitopes. This finding is reminiscent of our reported data on the HIV Gag CE and SIV Gag CE.18, 20
To promote the induction of Env CE-specific cellular immune responses, we designed and synthesized 2 versions of synthetic proteins (Env CE1 and Env CE2), each of which is composed of 12 conserved elements (Fig. 2A). Env CE1 and Env CE2 proteins differ by 0–5 amino acid per CE to maximize the coverage of common HIV variants. The CE were collinearly arranged and separated by short amino acid linkers (e.g.,3 amino acids) designed to facilitate processing of the protein and avoidance of neo-antigens.34,35 The coding sequences for Env CE1 and Env CE2 proteins were RNA/codon-optimized to maximize expression in mammalian cells and placed into a eukaryotic DNA plasmid vector, pCMVkan,36 between the human CMV promoter and bovine growth hormone poly A signal. The pCMVkan expression vector is optimized for optimal growth in bacteria (kanR) and expression of the insert in mammalian cells. The Env CE1 and Env CE2 proteins were expressed upon transient transfection of HEK293 cells (Fig. 2B). Env CE2 accumulated to higher level than Env CE1, possibly due to the 24 AA difference in these proteins, which could affect protein stability. In comparison, transfection of plasmids expressing gp145 Env proteins of BaL, 6101 and 1086 produced proteins that are found in both the cell-associated fraction (gp145) and the supernatant (processed gp120). Using FLAG-tagged version of the expression vectors to visualize the proteins efficiently, Env CE1 and Env CE2 proteins were found in the cytoplasm in a punctuate pattern in the perinuclear area of transfected HeLa cells (Fig. 2D). Western immunoblot analysis further showed that Env CE1 and Env CE2 proteins migrate as 2 bands found exclusively in the cell-associated fraction (Fig. 2B). To understand the nature of the 2 bands, cell extracts from HEK293 transfected cells were subjected to in vitro digestion with Endoglycosidase H (EndoH) and N-Glycosidase F (PNGase F), commonly used to interrogate protein glycosylation (Fig. 2C). Endo H removes mannose-rich oligosaccharides, but cannot cleave complex oligosaccharide structures, whereas PNGase F removes all N-linked carbohydrates. Both Env CE1 and Env CE2 proteins were sensitive to both endoglycosidases indicating that these proteins underwent posttranslational modifications. Thus, the 2 bands represent different glycosylation forms of the Env CE proteins. As positive control, an extract containing the intact gp145 Env protein (BaL) was used (Fig. 2C, bottom panel). We noted that the anti-gp120 serum used to visualize Env on the Western blot recognized the deglycosylated gp145 to a lesser extent as expected, since many antibodies are known to recognize the glycosylated forms of HIV Env.
To test immunogenicity of the Env CE DNA vaccine, a combination of the 2 Env CE plasmids was used to immunize 4 macaques (Fig. 3A) at 0, 2 and 4 months. The animals were monitored for the development of CE-specific T cell responses 2 weeks after the 2nd and the 3rd vaccination (V2, V3), and the durability of the responses was monitored for 3 months after the 3rd vaccination (Fig. 3B). This analysis demonstrated the presence of robust IFN-γ+ CE-specific cellular immune responses (0.1–0.8% of T cells), mediated primarily by CD8+ T cells, in all 4 animals. We interrogated both IFN-γ as well as TNF-α T cell responses. Since the TNF-α positive cells were also positive for IFN-γ, we focused our analysis on IFN-γ responses which covers all the T cell responses. In agreement with our previously reported data, maximal T cell responses were obtained with 2 to 3 DNA vaccinations using EP as delivery method. The Env CE vaccine induced both CD8+ and CD4+ memory T cell responses of the central and effector phenotype (Fig. 3C). The Env CE DNA vaccine also induced CE-specific responses with a significant fraction of CD8+ T cells with cytotoxic phenotype (Granzyme B+ and CD107a+) (Fig. 3D), while the CD4+ T cell responses with a cyotoxic phenotype were very low. We further found that CE-specific responses measured both as total as well as the subset of cytotoxic T cells showed robust durability with ~2-fold contraction over the 2 months following the prime (V3wk2 to V4). Thus, the Env-CE DNA vaccine induced cellular immune responses with the desired features for an effective T cell vaccine.
We previously reported that CE within HIV and SIV Gag were poorly immunogenic when present within the complete Gag protein, likely due to either suboptimal processing and presentation or immunological interference with other epitopes and thus, unable to induce de novo responses.18,20 We further found that the Gag CE-specific responses could be augmented upon booster vaccination with DNA expressing full-length Gag. This opens the possibility that Env CE-specific responses could be subject to the same mechanism. To address this experimentally, Env-CE DNA primed macaques received 2 env DNA booster vaccinations (Fig. 4A). To optimally cover the 12 CE sequences in Env CE1 and CE2, a mixture of 3 Env DNA, including BaL, 6101 and 1086, was used. Table 4 shows the alignment of the Env CE1 and CE2 sequences and the corresponding sequences in the selected Env proteins. Three of the 12 CE (CE6, CE7, CE9) show 100% identity with the Env sequences used in the booster vaccination, while the other CE sequences match except for 1 or 2 toggle AA. We generated gp145 versions of these Env proteins which (i) span the sequence covered by the CE and (ii) lack the immunodominant (ID) region in the extracellular gp41. Expression of these Env proteins is shown in Fig. 2B.
Implementation of the prime-boost regimen using the Env-CE DNA prime followed by the intact Env DNA boost (vaccination 4 and 5, Fig. 4A), demonstrated a significant 4–10-fold increase of CE-specific cellular responses in the 4 animals (Fig. 4B). In fact, 2 env DNA booster vaccinations lead to very robust levels of CE-specific immune responses (0.7–3% of total T cells). Thus, although inefficient in inducing primary responses to the CE, boosting with the intact Env DNA potently augmented pre-existing immunity demonstrating that the peptides within the CEs are properly processed and presented. This vaccine regimen achieved an effective shift in the immunological hierarchy, similar to our previously reported finding with HIV and SIV Gag vaccinations in macaques.18,20 Furthermore, the Env CE responses were monitored 8 months after the 2nd booster vaccination (Fig. 4B); these measurements showed 2- to 4-fold contraction compared with peak responses, supporting robust longevity of the CE-specific T cell memory responses.
In addition, boosting with intact env DNA led to a proportional increase in CD4+ and CD8+ effector memory responses (Fig. 4C). Boosting with intact env DNA further augmented the levels of cytotoxic (Granzyme B+ CD107a+) CD4+ and CD8+ T cell responses (Fig. 5; note that different scales were used). Flow analysis (Fig. 5A) showed the Granzyme B content and ability to degranulate (CD107a+) by the CE-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T cells. The levels of both cytotoxic CD4+ (Fig. 5B) and CD8+ (Fig. 5C) T cells increased. We found that the robust levels of the CD8+ T cell subset showed remarkable durability over the 8 months of follow-up, with a median 2-fold contraction.
To evaluate the immunogenicity of individual CE, PBMC were stimulated with 12 CE-specific pools. IFN-γ+ T cell response is plotted (Fig. 6) after the 3rd CE DNA prime and after the 2nd Env DNA boost and the responses are summarized in Table 5. Fine mapping showed that 6 of the 12 CE were immunogenic after the 3rd CE DNA prime (Table 5; prime) including CE7, CE8, CE9, CE11, CE14 and CE16, with 2–4 positive CE/animal. A comparison of responses to individual CE before and after boosting with DNA plasmids expressing intact Env showed that 7 of the 12 segments (60%) of the HIV Env CE are immunogenic. Responses to each individual CE were augmented further upon boost vaccination. Some of the CE (CE6, CE1, CE10, CE12 and CE15) did not show cellular responses in these animals. Interestingly, CE14, located in HR1 of gp41, appears to be immunogenic both within intact Env (Table 3) and the Env CE DNA vaccine (Table 5). We noted that upon booster vaccination the appearance of additional positive CE in 3 of the animals (L985, P574 and R067). We speculate that ‘new’ responses detectable only after the boost may reflect responses below threshold of detection after the priming vaccination and maybe the result of an overall increase in CE-specific response upon intact env DNA booster vaccination. Of note, the mapping of 12 individual CE is likely affected by the overall magnitude of the total CE response. For this reason, we believe that assessment of median values of positive CE/animal best reflects the data. In comparison to env DNA vaccinated animals (Table 2) which showed a median of 1 positive CE/animal among macaques mounting CE responses, the Env CE prime/env DNA boost vaccine induces significantly (p < 0.001) more positive CE/animal (median 4 CE) (Table 5). These data demonstrate that the CE prime/env DNA booster vaccination shifted the hierarchy toward broader Env CE-specific T cell responses.
The Env CE DNA vaccine was also interrogated for its ability to induce humoral immune responses. We tested whether antibodies induced upon Env CE vaccination could recognize the immunogen by Western immunoblot assay (Fig. 7A). The data from 2 of the 4 animals (L985, P574) showed that the priming vaccine induce antibodies that can detect the immobilized Env CE protein on the membrane. The responses developed by the other 2 macaques were below the threshold of detection. Upon boosting with complete env DNA both animals (L985, P574) showed stronger Env CE bands, indicating higher Env CE antibody titers. We next tested whether these antibodies could be detected by standard HIV gp120 Env ELISA. The antibodies induced by Env CE priming vaccinations in one of the 4 animals (P574) could be detected by ELISA (Fig. 7B) and, as expected, these antibodies further increased upon boost with intact Env. We further tested whether the Env CE DNA vaccine induced antibodies able to detect cross-clade Env (clade B and clade C) by Western blot assay (Fig. 7C). Both animals (L985, P574) showed that priming with Env CE induces antibodies able to recognize not only the immunogen (Fig. 7A) but also clade B and C Env, supporting the notion the antibodies recognize shared conserved sequences, and these responses increased upon env DNA booster vaccinations. Env CE DNA priming alone did not induce neutralizing antibodies (Nab), likely reflected by the low ELISA titers. Upon 2 env DNA booster vaccinations, low Nab responses to tier 1A Env (MW965.26 in all 4 animals and SHIV SF162.P4 in 3 animals) were found. Overall low titers of Nab are expected in the absence of a protein in the vaccine.31,42,43 We also analyzed whether the Env CE priming vaccination-induced antibodies could recognize linear peptides by ELISA screening of a library of 20-mer peptides with 14 AA overlap. As summarized in Table 6, all 4 animals showed responses to various linear peptides, although to different extents, and taken together peptides within CE6, CE9, CE10, CE12, CE14 and CE16 were recognized. Together, the analysis of the cellular and humoral immune responses induced by the Env CE DNA vaccine showed the development of immune responses able to recognize 10 of the 12 CE (located in C1, C2, C3, C5 and gp41 regions).
In this study, we expanded our HIV Conserved Element DNA vaccine concept and developed a DNA vaccine that focuses the immune responses to highly conserved sequences in Env. This DNA induces robust immune responses to epitopes that are only poorly immunogenic when present within intact Env. Addition of a booster vaccination with DNA expressing complete Env resulted in greatly increased Env immune responses focusing on the otherwise suboptimal Env CE regions. Thus, similarly to our reports with HIV and SIV Gag,18, 20, 21 priming with a DNA vaccine expressing only CE alters the immune hierarchy resulting in recognition of these subdominant epitopes. Interestingly, both for Env and Gag, the magnitude, breadth and cytotoxic phenotype of the CE-specific responses are significantly increased upon boosting with DNA expressing the full-length molecules. We hypothesize that the details of the processing and presentation of epitopes from full-length Env may be superior in their ability to augment pre-existing CE immunity, however, they are unable to induce de novo CE-specific responses in ~50% of the animals. The impairment of inducing de novo responses is thought to be due to the presence of dominant epitopes which suppress the development of the subdominant CE-specific T cell responses. Thus, priming with CE DNA and boosting with a plasmid expressing the intact protein may be generally applicable and may solve a major obstacle in HIV vaccine development, which is the focusing of responses to rapidly mutating immunodominant epitopes. This work demonstrates alteration of the hierarchy of epitope recognition and development of immune responses to potentially protective subdominant highly conserved epitopes.
The poor immunogenicity of the Env Conserved Elements reported in this study was found in macaques immunized with plasmid DNA encoding the complete Env protein. Several trials reported Env epitope mapping using samples from humans vaccinated with different forms of HIV-1 Env. Volunteers vaccinated with ADVAX37 or DNA/NYVAC38 developed cellular immune responses targeting few epitopes with a total coverage of around 20 different peptides (mean of 3 epitopes per subject in the ADVAX study; 4.2 epitopes in the DNA/NYVAC) with some of the reported peptides partially overlapping or containing CE637-38 and CE1 and CE13.38 These data suggest that the CE identified in our work are poorly immunogenic also in persons vaccinated with the full-length Env. Interestingly, many of the reported epitopes identified in humans are MHC class II restricted and, therefore the majority of the volunteers responding developed T cell responses predominantly mediated by CD4+ T cells. Similar results were also obtained in the RV144 vaccine trial combining ALVAC and bivalent HIV-1 gp120 as protein.39 In this study, which is the only trial that has identified low level of protection against infection, the vaccinated persons developed T cell responses targeting an average of 2 epitopes in Env, with a vast majority of these responses being mediated by CD4+ T cells, in many cases recognizing peptides in the V2 region containing the α4β7 integrin binding site.40 Predominant CD4+ T cells responses in volunteers immunized with different forms of HIV-1 Env were already identified in the early 1990s by Orentas et al, using samples from humans immunized with recombinant HIV-1 gp160.41 In contrast, the vaccine regimen described in this work (priming with Env CE DNA and boosting with the complete molecule) induces a balanced immune response mediated by both CD4+ and CD8+ T cells with cytotoxic phenotype and broad epitope recognition. It remains to be determined whether the macaque data reported here showing strong CD8+ T cell responses could be recapitulated after human immunization.
The data presented in this report provide a vaccine regimen able to induce potent T cell responses to subdominant epitopes. The question then arises whether the induced humoral immune responses are of better functional quality. A DNA only vaccine regimen is hampered by its inability to induce maximal antibody responses which can only achieve upon protein boost or co-immunization with protein.42,43 Such studies will be necessary to evaluate the full potential of the CE DNA vaccine regimen and we have already found that the CE DNA vaccine can induce responses to regions in Env that are only poorly immunogenic in macaques vaccinated with full-length env DNA. Thus, the Env CE DNA vaccine regimen has the potential to further positively affect humoral immune response development.
Plasmids HIV Env CE1 (plasmid 329H) and Env CE2 (plasmid 331H) contain the RNA/codon-optimized Env CE genes inserted into pCMVkan vector36 between the human CMV promoter and BGH polyadenylation signal. Both proteins contain the HIV BaL Env signal peptide at the N-terminus. Insertion of a FLAG-tag at the C–terminus of Env CE1 and Env CE2 generated plasmids 327H and 330H, respectively. HIV gp145dID (plasmid 332H, 341H and 340H) are based on HIV-1 clade B strain BaL, 6101 and clade C 1086, respectively, and express HIV gp145 Env (corresponding to AA 1–727 of HXB2) lacking the extracellular gp41 immunodominant region (corresponding to AA 590–608 of HXB2). All HIV Env proteins were produced from an RNA/codon optimized genes cloned into pCMVkan. Endotoxin-free DNAs (Qiagen, Valencia, CA) were prepared according to the manufacturer's protocol.
HEK293T cells seeded in 60 mm plates at a density of 106 cells/plate and were transfected by the Calcium Phosphate DNA co-precipitation procedure using 0.5 µg HIV env CE or 0.1 µg HIV gp145 env plasmid DNA together with 7 µg Bluescript as carrier DNA. Six hours after transfection the medium was replaced with 3 ml of complete DMEM. After 2 days, supernatants and cells were harvested, and the cells were lysed in 1 ml of hypertonic N1 lysis buffer (20 mM HEPES pH7.9, 10% glycerol, 1 mM MgCl2, 400 mM NaCl, 0.5 mM DTT, 0.5% Triton X-100), sonicated briefly for 2 × 6 seconds and centrifuged at 14 000 rpm for 15 min at 4°C. Endoglycosidase treatments were performed using 20 microliter cell lysates from HEK283 transfected cells. The cells were transfected with 1 µg DNA CE DNA and 0.2 µg env DNA, respectively. Extracts were untreated or digested for 1 hr at 37 °C with endoglycosidase H (EndoH) or N-Glycosidase F (PNGase F) (New England Biolabs, Inc., Ipswich, MA), respectively, following the manufacturer's instructions. Protein expression was analyzed by Western immunoblots using 12% sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gels (Nu-Page Bis-Tris, NuPAGE, Invitrogen, Life Technologies Corp., Carlsbad, CA) and blotted onto nitrocellulose membranes which were probed with a rabbit anti-HIV gp120 antibody (dilution 1:2000), followed by anti-Rabbit IgG-HRP labeled antibody (1:10,000 dilution, GE Healthcare, Piscataway, NJ). As control, the membranes were probed with anti-actin antibody (clone C4, EMD Millipore, Billerica, MA) at a dilution of 1:10,000. The bands were visualized using the enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) Prime Western blotting detection system (GE HealthCare, Piscataway, NJ).
The HeLa-derived HLtat cells (2 × 105 cells/35 mm glass-bottomed plate) were transfected with 200 ng of HIV Env CE1-FLAG (plasmid 327H) and Env CE2-FLAG (330H). After 24 h, the cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS, permeabilized with 0.5% Triton-X 100 in PBS, incubated with mouse anti-FLAG antibody (#F1804, Sigma, St. Louis, MO), followed by incubation with anti-mouse antibody conjugated with Alexa-Fluor 488 (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, at 1:750 dilution each) as secondary antibodies. The nuclei were stained with DAPI (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA). Cells were visualized on a Zeiss Observer Z1 fluorescent microscope using Zeiss Axiovision software (Carl Zeiss Microimaging GmbH, Göttingen, Germany).
This study was performed in accordance with the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the National Institutes of Health. Indian rhesus macaques were housed and handled in accordance with the standards of the Association for the Assessment and Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care International at the Advanced BioScience Laboratories Inc., MD, and were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (OLAW assurance number A3467–01 and USDA Certificate number 51-R-0059). All DNA vaccine mixtures contained 0.2 mg of expression-optimized macaque IL-12 DNA (plasmid AG157).
Four macaques (L985, P574, R067 and R288) received 3 DNA priming vaccinations using a mixture containing 1 mg (vaccination 1 and 2) or 2 mg (vaccination 3) of each HIV Env CE1 amd Env CE2 plasmids. The env pDNA booster vaccination used 1 mg of each of the 3 HIV gp145dID plasmids (BaL, 6101, 1086). The pDNA vaccine was formulated in water and delivered via i.m. injection at 2 different sites (0.3 ml each site) followed by in vivo electroporation (IM/EP) using the Elgen 1000 device (Inovio Pharmaceuticals Inc., Plymouth Meeting, PA).
Two groups of macaques (total 16 animals) were vaccinated with intact env DNA as part of other studies and PBMC collected after the last vaccination were analyzed for Env CE and total Env-specific responses for this study. Seven macaques (T134 through T151) were vaccinated (V1, V2 and V3) with a mixture of 2 mg of the 3 HIV gp145dID pDNA (mixture of HIV-1 clade B BaL and 6101, and clade C 1086) formulated in phosphate-buffered saline solution. The pDNA vaccine was delivered via i.m. injection at one site (0.5 ml) followed by in vivo electroporation with the CELLECTRA® 5P device (Inovio Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Plymouth Meeting, PA). Nine macaques (P909 through P941 starting by the letter “P”) were vaccinated with a mixture of 3 mg of HIV expressing BaL, 6101, 1086 and EnvC (GenBank accession number AAD12112.1) as gp160 (plasmids 217H, 98H, 284H, 158H) and as gp140 (plasmids 229H, 228H, 285H, 246H) and the full-length single-chain (FLSC) protein, a CD4-BaL gp120 fusion protein (plasmid 203H). The pDNA mixtures was formulated in phosphate-buffered saline solution and delivered via i.m. injection at 2 different sites (0.5 ml each site) followed by in vivo electroporation (IM/EP) using the ICHOR device (ICHOR Medical Systems, San Diego, CA).
Ficoll-hypaque isolated PBMC were cultured in 96-well plates in the presence of various peptide pools from HIV, at a final concentration of 1 μg/ml for each peptide. Two peptide pools, combining 15-mer peptides overlapping by 11 AA and 10-mer peptides overlapping by 9 AA (Infinity Biotech Research & Resource, Inc.) were prepared to cover all the CE. Pool 1 contains 126 peptides and covers CE1, 7, 8, 9, 10, 13 and 16 and pool 2 contains 125 peptides and covers CE6, 11, 12, 14, and 15. The Env CE-specific results are presented as the sum of the 2 pools. Analysis of total Env-specific responses was performed using pools of 15-mer peptides spanning gp120 (using BaL peptides) and gp41 (PTE pool). Antigen-specific T cells were measured by intracellular cytokine staining followed by polychromatic flow cytometry18,22 using the following cocktail of cell surface antibodies: CD3-APCCy7 (clone SP34–2), CD4-V500 (clone L200), CD8-Alexa Fluor-405 (clone 3B5, Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA), CD28-PerCP Cy5.5 (clone CD28.2, BioLegend, San Diego, CA) and CD95-FITC (clone DX2) (BD PharMingen, San Diego, CA). Ten minutes after addition of peptides, the CD107a-eFluor 660 (clone eBioH4A3, eBioscience San Diego, CA) or CD107a-PE antibody (clone eBioH4A3, eBioscience San Diego, CA) was added. After cell permeabilization, intracellular staining was performed using IFN-γ-PE Cy7 (clone B27, BD PharMingen), TNF-α-Alexa Fluor 700 (clone Mab11, BD PharMingen) and Granzyme B-PE antibodies or Granzyme B-APC antibodies (clone GB12, Invitrogen). As negative and positive controls, PBMC were cultured in medium without peptide pools or stimulated with PMA and calcium ionophore (Sigma, St. Louis, MO). Peptide-stimulated samples were considered positive if the responses were 2-fold higher than that of unstimulated medium only control and greater than 0.01 after subtracting the medium control value. Samples were acquired on a LSR II or Fortessa flow cytometer (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA), and the data were analyzed using FlowJo software (Tree Star, Inc., Ashland, OR).
Plasma samples were heat-inactivated for 30 minutes at 56°C. Binding antibodies to HIV env CE immunogen and intact Env were detected by Western immunoblot using cell extracts from HEK293 cells transfected with 1 μg of env CE DNA and 0.5 μg of env DNA (BaL gp145dID; 1086 gp145dID, respectively), separated on 12% SDS-PAGE, and the membranes were probed with pooled plasma (at a 1:100 dilution) and the bands were visualized with anti-monkey IgA, M, G-HRP antibody (1:10,000 dilution; cat# 43R-IG050hrp; Fitzgerald Industries International Inc., MA).22 The binding titers to HIV IIIB gp120 were determined by standard ELISA using serial dilutions of plasma samples (Advanced Bioscience Laboratory, Rockville, MD), measuring optical absorbance at 450 nm. Pepscan analysis was performed using 20-mer peptides overlapping by 14 AA derived from HIV BaL.
We thank D. Weiss, J. Treece, H. Anderson and staff at Bioqual and I. Kalisz (ABL) for excellent support, C. LaBranche and D. Montefiori (Duke University) for the neutralization assay, N. Miller (DAIDS/NIAID) for support, and T. Jones for editorial assistance. The following reagent was obtained through the NIH AIDS Reagent Program, Division of AIDS, NIAID, NIH: HIV-1 PTE Env Peptide Set (Cat #11551).
G.N.P., and B.K.F. are inventors on US Government-owned patents related to DNA vaccines and gene expression optimization. G.N.P., B.K.F., A.V. and J.I.M are inventors US Government- and Washington University- co-owned patent applications on the Conserved Element technology. K.E.B. and N.Y.S. are full time employees of Inovio Pharmaceuticals and as such receive compensation in the form of salary and stock options. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
This work was support by the Intramural Research Program of the National Cancer Institute (to G.N.P and B.K.F.). This work was supported in part thorough the Simian Vaccine Evaluation Unit SVEU P185 (DAIDS, NIAID).
X.H. performed experiments, analyzed results, and contributed to drafting the paper; M.R., C.A., B.C., J.B. performed experiments; K.E.B. and N.Y.S. contributed essential methods; J.I.M., S.M., S.L G, A.V., G.N.P., and B.K.F. designed the research, analyzed results, and wrote the paper.