PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of scirepAboutEditorial BoardFor AuthorsScientific Reports
 
Sci Rep. 2017; 7: 16890.
Published online 2017 December 4. doi:  10.1038/s41598-017-17322-0
PMCID: PMC5715102

Transcriptomic profiling of the human brain reveals that altered synaptic gene expression is associated with chronological aging

Abstract

Aging is a biologically universal event, and yet the key events that drive aging are still poorly understood. One approach to generate new hypotheses about aging is to use unbiased methods to look at change across lifespan. Here, we have examined gene expression in the human dorsolateral frontal cortex using RNA- Seq to populate a whole gene co-expression network analysis. We show that modules of co-expressed genes enriched for those encoding synaptic proteins are liable to change with age. We extensively validate these age-dependent changes in gene expression across several datasets including the publically available GTEx resource which demonstrated that gene expression associations with aging vary between brain regions. We also estimated the extent to which changes in cellular composition account for age associations and find that there are independent signals for cellularity and aging. Overall, these results demonstrate that there are robust age-related alterations in gene expression in the human brain and that genes encoding for neuronal synaptic function may be particularly sensitive to the aging process.

Introduction

Aging is an inherent, multidimensional biological process that includes aspects of physical and behavioral changes. Despite being universal in nature, and representing a major risk factor in multiple degenerative conditions, defining the biological basis of aging remains challenging. One general approach to understanding the basis of aging has been to examine correlative measures of chronological age. Because of the postulated role of genetics in aging1,2, gene expression has been measured in many tissues and species, including brain35. Similarly, epigenetic measures of aging have been shown to be reliable across multiple tissues6. We have previously reported on age-associated changes in gene expression7 and CpG methylation8 in the human brain. Collectively, these studies demonstrate that there are multiple epigenetic and gene expression changes that are associated with aging.

There have been many previous large-scale studies of gene expression in aging using microarrays914. However, the development of RNA-sequencing (RNA-Seq) has shown that microarrays have several limitations including a narrow dynamic range that can lead to underestimation of differential gene expression15. Recent studies have indicated that RNA-Seq can be used to reliably estimate gene expression in the brain, for example to show changes that occur with development in rodents16 and humans17.

Here, we perform an RNA-Seq analysis on the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, an anatomically well-defined region of the brain available from many brain banks and used in other transcriptomic studies1820, from a series of individuals across human aging. Using weighted gene correlation network analysis (WGCNA) to identify groups of genes with similar expression patterns21, as previously applied to several microarray studies of the brain914, we find evidence of many relationships between gene expression and brain aging. We extensively validate these observations against publically available datasets and address brain regional effects and estimate the likely contribution of changes in cellular composition to gene expression. Collectively, the results provide a series of newly identified changes in human brain aging with a particularly strong regional association with loss of synaptic gene expression.

Results

Detection of modules of co-expression in the human brain

Using samples from the frontal lobe of the cerebral cortex of 56 human subjects from 15–79 years of age (Supplementary Fig. S1 and Supplementary file 1), we generated RNA-Seq expression data with a mean of 242,340,441 bp paired end reads (range 85,325,632–548,398,101). From these, we could align an average of 96.5% of reads (range 89.1–98.2%) to the human genome (Supplementary file 2). The final dataset has 39,460 transcripts, mapped to 11,648 genes, that were expressed more than one SD from the mean of intronic expression and detected in >95% of subjects.

We used WGCNA to examine transcripts that were co-expressed within the data. The network approximated a scale-free topology at a soft thresholding power of 6 (Supplementary Fig. S2) and contained 37,029 transcripts assigned to 23 discrete modules, with 2611 transcripts not assigned to a specific module (Fig. 1a and Supplementary file 3).

Figure 1
WGCNA derived modules of gene expression. (a) An overall view of the network of gene expression. Height on the y-axes represents the dissimilarity of detected transcripts from the overall topology of gene expression. Colors below each line show the modules ...

To classify the WGCNA modules, we first performed enrichment of gene ontology (GO) terms (Supplementary file 4), which provided unique categorizations for 22 modules in the domain of biological processes (summarized in Table 1). We also identified the most highly connected hub transcripts within each module (Table 1). The WGCNA modules reflected both functional and cellular processes and, at least in some cases, there was an obvious biological connection between the hub genes and the GO:enrichment for biological processes. For example, the cyan module was highly enriched for GO: 0007005 (Fig. 1c), representing mitochondrion organization, and the most highly connected hub gene, NDUFA2, encodes the mitochondrial NADH:Ubiquinone Oxidoreductase Subunit A2 (Table 1). Some modules appeared to represent specific cell types, including the red module that was enriched for GO: 0007272, ensheathment of neurons that, in turn, contained multiple genes associated with myelinating cells such as MBP, MAG and PMP22 (Fig. 1d).

Table 1
Summary of WGCNA analysis.

Many transcript level associations between gene expression and aging

We next examined the correlations of eigengenes for each module with both technical (RNA integrity number [RIN], post-mortem interval [PMI] and batch in which the sample was sequenced) and biological (gender and age) variables (Supplementary Fig. S3). There were only moderate associations with technical variables. For example, the strongest association for RIN was with the darkgreen module (R = 0.36, adjusted p = 0.007). There were no significant associations between module eigengene expression and gender, which may be due to the relatively small number of male brains in our final dataset (14 from 56 samples). In contrast, there were 6 module eigengenes that showed significant positive and 8 that showed significant negative associations with age (Supplementary Fig. S3). These analyses suggest that age strongly correlates with gene expression in the brain. We therefore looked in turn at the most significant modules that were positively and negatively associated with aging in brain.

The eigengene for the green module (2081 transcripts from 777 genes) showed a strong positive correlation with age (R = 0.7, adjusted p = 2 × 10−9). GO profiling demonstrated multiple categorizations related to RNA metabolism and the nucleus (Fig. 2a). Specific genes in this module included NOL3 that encodes a nucleolar protein (Fig. 2b,c; R = 0.67, p = 1.3 × 10−8 for the association of transcript uc031qwm.1 with age) and heteronuclear ribonucleoproteins including HNRNPA1 (Fig. 2b,d; R = 0.53, p = 2.3 × 10−5 for uc001sfn.3). These associations of nuclear genes with aging may indicate active control of gene expression during the aging process (see discussion). There was an equally strong positive association with age for the eigengene of the tan module (R = 0.7, p = 2 × 10−9). The strongest individual association in this module was with RHBDL3, a rhomboid-like protease that we have previously nominated7 as associated with age (R = 0.809, p = 2.56 × 10−14 for transcript uc010csx.1). This module was not associated with a unique GO enrichment for biological process, but was enriched for the kegg pathways, insulin signaling pathway and longevity regulating pathways. The tan module included the genes protein phosphatase PPP1R3E (Fig. 2g; R = 0.65, p = 7.23 × 10−8 for uc001wjc.2) and PPARGC1A (Fig. 2h; R = 0.47, p = 0.0003 for uc031sdy.1), the latter encoding the transcriptional coactivator PGC1α. Prior evidence has linked aging to specific genes such as PGC1α22 but also the more general process of insulin signaling23, suggesting the associations of gene expression with age in this sample series have biological validity.

Figure 2
Genes that accumulate with aging in the brain include RNA metabolism and longevity genes. (a) The green module, with a correlation between module eigengene and age of 0.7 (p = 2 × 10−9), contained multiple ...

Conversely, there was a strong negative association with age for the brown module eigengene (R = −0.79, adjusted p = 5 × 10−13). In this module, we found a strong accumulation of genes encoding synaptic proteins (Supplementary file 4), with the GO term synaptic signaling significantly enriched (adjusted p = 5.7 × 10−19; Table 1). Several transcripts from genes coding for synaptic proteins including both AMPA (Fig. 3c; gene GRIA1; R = −0.696, p = 2.6 × 10−9 for uc011dcy.2), NMDA (Fig. 3d; GRIN2A: R = −0.728, p = 2.08 × 10−10 for uc010uym.2) and Kainate type glutamate receptors showed negative associations with age. However, changes in neurotransmitter genes were not limited to excitatory glutamate systems, as we also found decreased expression of inhibitory GABA subunits with age (Supplementary Fig. S4h,i). Our data further suggest that as well as there being changes in overall expression of many genes with aging, some genes may additionally show splicing alterations. For example, while some transcripts for the neuronal cell adhesion molecule NCAM1 showed negative associations with age (Fig. 3e; R = −0.656, p = 4.12 × 10−8 for uc001pns.3), other transcripts for the same gene showed no significant associations with age (Fig. 3e; uc021qqo.1, R = 0.181, p = 0.2).

Figure 3
Diminished expression of transcripts encoding synaptic proteins with age. (a) GO enrichment for the brown module shows multiple strong enrichments with aspects of neuronal function, with the −log(P) for each GO term shown on the x-axis for multiple ...

Outside of neuronal genes such as neurotransmitters and adhesion molecules, some more general cellular markers also showed negative associations with age. These include the royal blue module (R for module eigengene and age −0.74, p = 5 × 10−11) that contains the inflammatory mediator TGFB1 (Supplementary Fig. S4a–c) and the purple module (R = −0.59, p = 2 × 10−6 for module eigengene and age), which was classified with the GO term response to endoplasmic reticulum stress and included transcripts for the known ER stress mediator ATF6 (Supplementary Fig. S4d–f). As genes such as TGFB1 and ATF6 are expressed in non-neuronal cells, these data show that not all genes associated with age are in neuronal modules.

Validation and estimation of brain regional effects

To determine if the associations of genes with aging were robust, we first compared the associations with aging to previously generated microarray datasets from our lab using the same subjects7. To provide equivalency with prior data, we removed genes that showed divergence in significance between transcripts mapped to the same gene, selected the highest expressed single transcripts in the RNAseq data and matched to all genes also detected in the array dataset (see methods). We found a positive correlation (R = 0.711, p < 10−16) between association of age and each gene in the RNA-Seq and array datasets (Supplementary Fig. S5a). We further validated these results using an independently ascertained sample series24, where again there was a positive correlation between the effects of aging with our RNA-Seq data (R = 0.483, p < 10−16 ; Supplementary Fig. S5b). The similarity between the current dataset and previously microarray datasets suggests that the age associations nominated here are platform-independent and therefore robust, noting that this considers only genes estimated in both RNA-Seq and arrays and therefore does not consider genes only found in the former dataset.

To further validate the associations of gene expression using an RNA-Seq dataset, we used the publically available GTEx dataset that contains independently ascertained samples. As the GTEx data is summarized to the gene, not transcript level, we again picked the highest expressed transcript for each gene in our data to provide an equivalent comparison. As for the observations with previous microarrays, there was a positive correlation (R = 0.574, p < 10−16) in the estimates of association with age for all genes (Fig. 4a).

Figure 4
Validation of age associations against GTEx data and regional events (a) Overall consistency between the correlations of gene expression and age in our dataset (x axis) and the GTEx frontal cortex (y axis). Each point represents a different gene and is ...

Collectively, these results support the hypothesis that there are many age- associations with gene expression in the human brain that are robust to sample series and gene expression platform.

An important advantage of the GTEx dataset over other sample series is that multiple brain regions were sampled. Therefore, we additionally compared age associations across all brain regions. In general, the brain areas that are anatomically and evolutionarily related showed greater consistency in the associations between aging and gene expression (Fig. 4b and Supplementary Fig. S6). For example, the overall correlation for age-related associations between the frontal cerebral cortex and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex was 0.76 when considering only genes expressed in both regions. The same measure between two areas of the striatum, the caudate and putamen was 0.84. In contrast, more distant areas such as the spinal cord and frontal cortex showed much lower correlations (R = 0.44).

Prior studies have suggested that there are regional differences in the associations of aging with gene expression and that more recently evolved structures show enhanced associations with aging. To test this, we counted the number of significant associations in the GTEx dataset (Fig. 4c). The frontal cortex showed the highest number of associations, with other brain regions generally showing fewer associations in a similar order as the overall correlations between regions, except for the cerebellum that showed the second highest number of associations after the frontal cortex.

Finally, to examine associations with specific genes, we looked at excitatory (Fig. 4d) or inhibitory (Fig. 4e) neurotransmitter receptor candidates from our own dataset in the different GTEx brain regions. We confirmed that there are significant age associations with five genes (GABRA5, GABRB3, GRIK4, GRIN2A and GRIA1), all in the same direction and a similar magnitude to our dataset in the GTEx frontal cortex data. From the validated genes, we found substantial variation across regions. For example, GRIN2A showed significant negative association with age in all brain regions except amygdala, spinal cord, nucleus accumbens and substantia nigra, despite being adequately detected in all brain regions (Fig. 4d). Finally, we looked at genes related to dopamine neurotransmission that showed more variable expression across brain regions, specifically tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) and two major dopamine receptor genes, DRD1 and DRD2 and noted that the latter two genes showed a significant correlation with age in the caudate and putamen, two major regions of dopaminergic innervation from the substantia nigra (Fig. 4f). These results show that different brain regions have differential responses to aging.

Contribution of cellularity changes with aging

We considered that these effects on synaptic gene expression might be related to changes in the cellular composition of the samples with aging. Specifically, it has been suggested that there is a loss of subtypes of neurons in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex with age in different species25,26. We have also recently shown, using microarray data, that there are potential changes in glial cell gene expression with aging that are consistent across brain regions27. Therefore, loss of synaptic gene expression with aging might feasibly be accounted for by changes in the proportion of neuronal and glial cells with age. To address this potential confounding variable, we first examined expression of genes representative of the major populations of neurons and glial cells in each population, we used genes identified as differentially expressed between cell types in a recent single cell analysis of human brain28 and confirmed that these are authentic markers represented specific cell types by cross-referencing with additional RNA-Seq data (see Methods). Plotting out the associations with age in this set of genes (Fig. 5a) showed that neuronal genes tended to have negative associations with age whereas marker genes of oligodendrocytes tended to increase with age. An identical pattern was seen in the GTEx frontal cortex data although the decrement in neuronal restricted genes was less pronounced in GTEx cerebellum data (Supplementary Fig. S7).

Figure 5
Population-specific expression analysis disambiguates age-related changes in cellularity from cell-dependent gene expression. (a) Correlation (GS) between age and transcript expression for genes representative of the major classes of cells in the CNS ...

To further discriminate between the effects of loss of neurons compared to loss of neuronal gene expression, we used population specific expression analysis (PSEA29,30) to estimate and correct for proportions of neuronal and glial cells in our RNA-Seq dataset. Using the same set of cell-specific marker genes as above, we constructed a marker reference for each cell type for each sample. These markers had the expected property of correlating well with known marker genes for each cell type, and were distinct from those genes used to generate the marker (Supplementary Fig. S8a). Plotting age against proportion of cells further confirmed loss of overall neuronal gene expression and increases in oligodendrocyte markers with age (Supplementary Fig. S8b).

We noted that many of the top associations were not in cell type restricted genes (Supplementary Fig. S8c). For example, TMEM198 (R = −0.86; p = 1.7 × 10−7 for association with age in WGCNA) showed association with markers of neurons, but also with astrocytes and microglia (Supplementary Fig. S8c). Conversely, not all neuronal restricted genes showed negative associations with age. For example, both SST and TMEM130 are both restricted to neurons and correlated with neuronal estimates from PSEA but only SST showed a negative association with age (Supplementary Fig. S9). These data suggest that the expression of some, but not all, neuronal genes might be influenced by cellularity.

To further test the contribution of cellularity to altered gene expression with aging, we generated residuals of gene expression from a linear model using the neuronal population marker, thereby correcting the raw expression data for the number of neurons in each sample. Comparing the relationship of associations of gene expression with age in each WGCNA module in uncorrected and corrected analyses demonstrated that loss of neurons accounts for some, but not all, of the observed associations, as demonstrated by the decrease in estimate of association with age across the modules (Fig. 5b). For example, within the brown ‘synaptic’ module that showed strong negative associations with age, the number of significant associations decreased from 2356 to 1170 after correction for neuronal markers (Fig. 5c). Some modules were more robust to correction for neuronal estimate, including the royal blue module that contained several transcripts for the microglial gene Colony stimulating factor 1 receptor (Fig. 5a,b). Importantly, even after correction for neuronal estimates, many significant associated remained, including GRIA1 and GRIN2A (Fig. 5d,e). Similar patterns of variable correction for neuronal estimates were seen in the GTEx dataset (Supplementary Fig. S10). Collectively, these results show that while some of the gene expression signal associated with age may be related to differences in cellularity, there are also likely associations independent of cell type.

Discussion

Identifying age-related changes in gene expression is one of several ways in which the aging process can be defined. Here we examined gene expression in the brain using RNA-Seq and a sample series that we previously have examined with microarrays7,27 as a way to explore the biology of human aging.

Consistent with prior studies using microarrays, gene expression in the brain appears to be robustly organized into modules to which WGCNA is sensitive3137. These modules of gene expression reflect organization of brain structures and function, being readily categorized by gene ontology related to specific cell types or subcellular organelles, the latter including mitochondria and synaptic vesicles.

Our dataset identified a series of associations of gene expression with aging, including several that have been proposed previously based on microarrays7,27. A striking novel finding was the robust negative associations of genes encoding synaptic proteins with age. These expression changes are likely related to functional changes in synaptic integrity seen with aging in a variety of contexts3840. Because our RNA-Seq dataset contains a relatively large number of detected genes, we could show that synaptic changes occur across multiple neurotransmitter types, including both excitatory glutamateric and inhibitory GABAergic synapses. Furthermore, genes encoding both pre- and post-synaptic proteins are affected, potentially in tandem. Confirming these in the GTEx dataset allowed us to demonstrate regional variation in synaptic protein expression, with some of the strongest effects in areas of the cortex, the hippocampus (Ammon’s horn) and striatum. It is of interest that these areas have undergone relatively recent evolutionary changes in humans, including the expansion and involution of the cerebral cortex41. However, not all transmitter types are affected in all brain regions as, for example, D1 type dopamine receptors are resistant to aging effects and D2 type receptors decline mainly in the two regions with highest expression of these genes, the caudate and putamen.

Given the apparent strength and validity of changes in synaptic gene expression in this study, it is important to consider why these have not been widely reported in prior array studies, including our own studies using the same source material7. Examining prior data, we note that strong candidates such as GRIA1 or GRIN2A were not reliably assayed in our previous microarray study and therefore were not able to be considered previously. Furthermore, the overall distribution of values of association with age was broader in RNASeq (Supplementary Fig. S11), assisting in detection of age-assocations.

A general concern with estimates of gene expression in the brain is that they are influenced by heterogeneous cellularity. For example, prior studies have reported activation of microglia and astrocytes with aging27,42 and, as noted above, there is evidence of neuronal loss in the brain region used to generate our dataset25,26. However, our data suggests that such changes in cellularity do not fully explain overall gene expression associations with age based on several independent considerations. First, some single gene markers of neurons do not show changes with age while others show relatively large changes with some intermediates. Second, the deconvolution of gene expression signatures with PSEA demonstrated a residual association with age. Third, although there is imaging-based evidence of loss of volume in some regions with aging, the estimated rates of loss are in the order of 0.2–0.5% per year43,44. For a strongly associated transcript such as GRIA1, there was a ~50% decrease in expression over the range of our dataset (64 years). Nonetheless, it is hard to formally reject the possibility that there are neurons, and potentially even subsets of neurons, that are lost with aging. Given that PSEA-based correction for neuronal estimates lead to a net decrease in the number of significant associations with age, it is likely that the age associations seen in this study are a mixture of changes in cellularity and gene expression changes per cell. It would be of interest in the future to look at age-related associations in gene expression at the single cell level. We also note that we have not confirmed any gene expression associations at the protein level, which would be an important future extension of the current dataset.

A difference between prior studies and the current approach is that we estimated transcript level associations rather than aggregating to the gene level. In line with expectations, multiple transcripts from the same gene generally correlated with each other, presumably due to expression at the overall gene level. However, there were examples for specific genes (e.g., NCAM1) where some transcripts show age association while others do not, which presumably reflect alternate exon usage driven by splicing changes with aging. The current study, with a limited number of subjects, is unlikely to be adequately powered to explore the full associations of splicing with aging in the brain, but future experiments could be designed with more samples and greater read depth to assess if there generalized associations between splicing and aging in the brain.

Overall, these results show that RNA-Seq provides an insight into the process of brain aging and that, in humans, robust changes in synaptic proteins at transcript levels can be detected in the aging brain. We speculate that these associations may be relevant to the study of age-related neurological and psychiatric disorders, as well as some of the well documented changes in brain function with normal aging.

Methods

Ethical Approval

Experiments using human post-mortem materials were approved by the National Institutes of Health Office of Human Subjects Research (OHSR) after determination to be Not Human Subjects research due to the de-identified nature of the samples. All procedures were performed in accordance with guidelines of the National Institutes of Health.

RNA extraction and sequencing

Total RNA was extracted from human frontal cortex using a glass dounce tissue homogenizer and trizol. An Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer RNA Nano Chip was utilized to measure the RNA quality; samples had a mean RIN of 7.9 (+/−1.1). Poly(A) + RNA was purified from 10ug of total RNA using oligo-dT magnetic beads. cDNA libraries were synthesized using the mRNA preparation kit (Illumina cat. no. RS-100-0801) as per the manufacturer’s protocol (http://mmjggl.caltech.edu/sequencing/mRNA-Seq_SamplePrep_1004898_D.pdf). A single library was run on each flowcell lane of an Illumina Hi-Seq sequencer generating 100 bp paired end reads. Sequence alignments.

We used the high-performance computational capabilities of the Biowulf Linux cluster at the National Institutes of Health, Bethesda MD (http://biowulf.nih.gov). Fastq files were aligned to the human reference genome (hg19) using GSNAP45. Transcript estimates were quantified with RSeQC46 and normalized using CQN47. Overall quality and total read counts are listed in Supplementary File 1.

Whole genome co-expression Network Analysis (WGCNA) Normalized transcript expression was used as an input for the R package WGCNA21. Gene expression modules within a signed network were generated in a blockwise fashion using a soft-thresholding power of 6, which approximated a scale-topology (Supplementary Fig. S2). The minimum size of the modules was set at 200 and cut height at 1. The eigengenes for each module were correlated against RIN of the sample, PMI, batch in which the sample was sequenced, gender and age of the donor. Modules were classified for gene ontology enrichments using gProfileR48 within R. We used cytoscape for module visualization, with the most highly expressed transcript in the dataset for each gene used to represent that gene. Either grid layout or the yFiles organic layout were used for subsets of genes identified by specific GO terms within a modules and edges were bundled using default settings in cytoscape.

Validation against other microarray and RNA-Seq datasets

For validation, we used three independently ascertained sample series; our own sample series with gene expression estimated using Illumina beadchip arrays7; the frontal cortex series from Colantuoni et al., assayed using a custom array24; and the GTEx dataset that used RNA-Seq but with multiple brain regions and estimated gene expression per gene rather than per transcript. In each case, we used the dataset provided normalized values (e.g. FPKM reads for GTEx) to calculate the association with age (and nominal p value) and gene expression for each probe using the WGCNA package. We then matched genes and compared R values in each series. Where there were multiple potential matches, for example where we had multiple transcripts in our dataset to compare against gene-level estimates in GTEx, we used the transcript with the highest mean expression in our dataset. We did not consider genes in our dataset where multiple transcripts diverged widely, or genes in the array datasets that were not detected.

Population specific expression analysis (PSEA)

We used PSEA essentially as described previously29,30. To construct sets of reference marker genes for the principal cell types of the CNS, we used the most highly differentially expressed genes identified by single cell RNA-Seq.28 and manually removed any genes that showed ambiguous cell type specificity based on available data at http://web.stanford.edu/group/barres_lab/brainseqMariko/brainseq.2.html that incorporates mouse brain single cell RNA-Seq.49. We then used multiple regression using theses sets of markers to estimate the proportions of neurons, astrocytes, oligodendrocytes and microglia in each sample. Conversely, we used the residuals after linear regression for neuronal marker estimate per sample for each probe to correct age associations for number of neurons.

Data availability

Raw gene expression data has been submitted to the database of Genotypes and Phenotypes (dbGaP) with the accession number phs001353.v1.p1, entitled NABEC mRNA Sequencing of Human Cerebral Frontal Cortex.

Electronic supplementary material

Acknowledgements

This research was supported in part by the Intramural Research Program of the NIH, National Institute on Aging and by the Swedish Research Council.

Author Contributions

Author Contributions

A.A.D., E.M., D.H. and S.A. performed all experimental procedures. J.R.G., J.D., A.A.D. and M.R.C. performed analyses on the dataset. B.J.T., A.B.S. and M.R.C. conceived of the overall direction of the experiments and initiated the sample collections. D.G. and M.R.C. co-supervised the work. A.A.D., M.RC. and D.G. generated the initial draft and all authors have read the submitted version of this manuscript.

Notes

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Footnotes

Electronic supplementary material

Supplementary information accompanies this paper at 10.1038/s41598-017-17322-0.

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

1. Kirkwood TBL. Systems biology of ageing and longevity. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B. Biol. Sci. 2011;366:64–70. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2010.0275. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
2. Moskalev AA, Aliper AM, Smit-McBride Z, Buzdin A, Zhavoronkov A. Genetics and epigenetics of aging and longevity. Cell Cycle Georget. Tex. 2014;13:1063–1077. doi: 10.4161/cc.28433. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
3. Ryan MM, Guévremont D, Luxmanan C, Abraham WC, Williams JM. Aging alters long-term potentiation-related gene networks and impairs synaptic protein synthesis in the rat hippocampus. Neurobiol. Aging. 2015;36:1868–1880. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2015.01.012. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
4. Fushan AA, et al. Gene expression defines natural changes in mammalian lifespan. Aging Cell. 2015;14:352–365. doi: 10.1111/acel.12283. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
5. Glaab E, Schneider R. Comparative pathway and network analysis of brain transcriptome changes during adult aging and in Parkinson’s disease. Neurobiol. Dis. 2015;74:1–13. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2014.11.002. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
6. Horvath S. DNA methylation age of human tissues and cell types. Genome Biol. 2013;14:R115. doi: 10.1186/gb-2013-14-10-r115. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
7. Kumar A, et al. Age-associated changes in gene expression in human brain and isolated neurons. Neurobiol. Aging. 2013;34:1199–1209. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2012.10.021. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
8. Hernandez DG, et al. Distinct DNA methylation changes highly correlated with chronological age in the human brain. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2011;20:1164–1172. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddq561. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
9. Oldham MC, et al. Functional organization of the transcriptome in human brain. Nat. Neurosci. 2008;11:1271–1282. doi: 10.1038/nn.2207. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
10. Miller JA, Horvath S, Geschwind DH. Divergence of human and mouse brain transcriptome highlights Alzheimer disease pathways. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2010;107:12698–12703. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0914257107. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
11. Voineagu I, et al. Transcriptomic analysis of autistic brain reveals convergent molecular pathology. Nature. 2011;474:380–384. doi: 10.1038/nature10110. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
12. Ponomarev I, Wang S, Zhang L, Harris RA, Mayfield RD. Gene coexpression networks in human brain identify epigenetic modifications in alcohol dependence. J. Neurosci. Off. J. Soc. Neurosci. 2012;32:1884–1897. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3136-11.2012. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
13. Kang HJ, et al. Spatio-temporal transcriptome of the human brain. Nature. 2011;478:483–489. doi: 10.1038/nature10523. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
14. Hawrylycz M, et al. Canonical genetic signatures of the adult human brain. Nat. Neurosci. 2015;18:1832–1844. doi: 10.1038/nn.4171. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
15. ’t Hoen PAC, et al. Deep sequencing-based expression analysis shows major advances in robustness, resolution and inter-lab portability over five microarray platforms. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008;36:e141. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkn705. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
16. Dillman AA, et al. mRNA expression, splicing and editing in the embryonic and adult mouse cerebral cortex. Nat. Neurosci. 2013;16:499–506. doi: 10.1038/nn.3332. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
17. Jaffe AE, et al. Developmental regulation of human cortex transcription and its clinical relevance at single base resolution. Nat. Neurosci. 2015;18:154–161. doi: 10.1038/nn.3898. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
18. Mazin P, et al. Widespread splicing changes in human brain development and aging. Mol. Syst. Biol. 2013;9:633. doi: 10.1038/msb.2012.67. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
19. Pantazatos SP, et al. Whole-transcriptome brain expression and exon-usage profiling in major depression and suicide: evidence for altered glial, endothelial and ATPase activity. Mol. Psychiatry. 2017;22:760–773. doi: 10.1038/mp.2016.130. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
20. Bernstein AI, et al. 5-Hydroxymethylation-associated epigenetic modifiers of Alzheimer’s disease modulate Tau-induced neurotoxicity. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2016;25:2437–2450. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
21. Langfelder P, Horvath S. WGCNA: an R package for weighted correlation network analysis. BMC Bioinformatics. 2008;9:559. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-9-559. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
22. Austin S, St-Pierre J. PGC1α and mitochondrial metabolism–emerging concepts and relevance in ageing and neurodegenerative disorders. J. Cell Sci. 2012;125:4963–4971. doi: 10.1242/jcs.113662. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
23. López-Otín C, Blasco MA, Partridge L, Serrano M, Kroemer G. The hallmarks of aging. Cell. 2013;153:1194–1217. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.05.039. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
24. Colantuoni C, et al. Temporal dynamics and genetic control of transcription in the human prefrontal cortex. Nature. 2011;478:519–523. doi: 10.1038/nature10524. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
25. Smith DE, Rapp PR, McKay HM, Roberts JA, Tuszynski MH. Memory impairment in aged primates is associated with focal death of cortical neurons and atrophy of subcortical neurons. J. Neurosci. Off. J. Soc. Neurosci. 2004;24:4373–4381. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4289-03.2004. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
26. Stranahan AM, Jiam NT, Spiegel AM, Gallagher M. Aging reduces total neuron number in the dorsal component of the rodent prefrontal cortex. J. Comp. Neurol. 2012;520:1318–1326. doi: 10.1002/cne.22790. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
27. Soreq L, et al. Major Shifts in Glial Regional Identity Are a Transcriptional Hallmark of Human Brain Aging. Cell Rep. 2017;18:557–570. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2016.12.011. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
28. Darmanis S, et al. A survey of human brain transcriptome diversity at the single cell level. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2015;112:7285–7290. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1507125112. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
29. Kuhn A, Thu D, Waldvogel HJ, Faull RLM, Luthi-Carter R. Population-specific expression analysis (PSEA) reveals molecular changes in diseased brain. Nat. Methods. 2011;8:945–947. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1710. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
30. Kuhn A, et al. Cell population-specific expression analysis of human cerebellum. BMC Genomics. 2012;13:610. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-13-610. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
31. Akula N, Wendland JR, Choi KH, McMahon FJ. An Integrative Genomic Study Implicates the Postsynaptic Density in the Pathogenesis of Bipolar Disorder. Neuropsychopharmacol. Off. Publ. Am. Coll. Neuropsychopharmacol. 2016;41:886–895. doi: 10.1038/npp.2015.218. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
32. Bettencourt C, et al. Gene co-expression networks shed light into diseases of brain iron accumulation. Neurobiol. Dis. 2016;87:59–68. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2015.12.004. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
33. Holtman IR, et al. Induction of a common microglia gene expression signature by aging and neurodegenerative conditions: a co-expression meta-analysis. Acta Neuropathol. Commun. 2015;3:31. doi: 10.1186/s40478-015-0203-5. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
34. Mamdani M, et al. Integrating mRNA and miRNA Weighted Gene Co-Expression Networks with eQTLs in the Nucleus Accumbens of Subjects with Alcohol Dependence. PloS One. 2015;10:e0137671. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0137671. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
35. Miller JA, Woltjer RL, Goodenbour JM, Horvath S, Geschwind DH. Genes and pathways underlying regional and cell type changes in Alzheimer’s disease. Genome Med. 2013;5:48. doi: 10.1186/gm452. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
36. Rosen EY, et al. Functional genomic analyses identify pathways dysregulated by progranulin deficiency, implicating Wnt signaling. Neuron. 2011;71:1030–1042. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2011.07.021. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
37. Stacey D, et al. A translational systems biology approach in both animals and humans identifies a functionally related module of accumbal genes involved in the regulation of reward processing and binge drinking in males. J. Psychiatry Neurosci. JPN. 2015;41:150138. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
38. Leal SL, Yassa MA. Neurocognitive Aging and the Hippocampus across Species. Trends Neurosci. 2015;38:800–812. doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2015.10.003. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
39. Sama DM, Norris CM. Calcium dysregulation and neuroinflammation: discrete and integrated mechanisms for age-related synaptic dysfunction. Ageing Res. Rev. 2013;12:982–995. doi: 10.1016/j.arr.2013.05.008. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
40. Dorszewska J. Cell biology of normal brain aging: synaptic plasticity-cell death. Aging Clin. Exp. Res. 2013;25:25–34. doi: 10.1007/s40520-013-0004-2. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
41. Enard W. The Molecular Basis of Human Brain Evolution. Curr. Biol. CB. 2016;26:R1109–R1117. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2016.09.030. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
42. Erraji-Benchekroun L, et al. Molecular aging in human prefrontal cortex is selective and continuous throughout adult life. Biol. Psychiatry. 2005;57:549–558. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2004.10.034. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
43. Peters R. Ageing and the brain. Postgrad. Med. J. 2006;82:84–88. doi: 10.1136/pgmj.2005.036665. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
44. Hedman AM, van Haren NEM, Schnack HG, Kahn RS, Hulshoff Pol HE. Human brain changes across the life span: a review of 56 longitudinal magnetic resonance imaging studies. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2012;33:1987–2002. doi: 10.1002/hbm.21334. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
45. Wu TD, Reeder J, Lawrence M, Becker G, Brauer MJ. GMAP and GSNAP for Genomic Sequence Alignment: Enhancements to Speed, Accuracy, and Functionality. Methods Mol. Biol. Clifton NJ. 2016;1418:283–334. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-3578-9_15. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
46. Wang L, Wang S, Li W. RSeQC: quality control of RNA-seq experiments. Bioinforma. Oxf. Engl. 2012;28:2184–2185. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts356. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
47. Li S, et al. Detecting and correcting systematic variation in large-scale RNA sequencing data. Nat. Biotechnol. 2014;32:888–895. doi: 10.1038/nbt.3000. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
48. Reimand J, et al. g:Profiler-a web server for functional interpretation of gene lists (2016 update) Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44:W83–89. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw199. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
49. Zhang Y, et al. An RNA-sequencing transcriptome and splicing database of glia, neurons, and vascular cells of the cerebral cortex. J. Neurosci. Off. J. Soc. Neurosci. 2014;34:11929–11947. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1860-14.2014. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group