PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of abjsLink to Publisher's site
 
Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2017 September; 5(5): 328–331.
PMCID: PMC5712400

Clinical Results of Platelet-Rich Plasma for Partial Thickness Rotator Cuff Tears: A Case Series

Abstract

Partial thickness rotator cuff tears (PTRCTs) are a common pathology among shoulder disorders in people over 50 years. Treatment of PTRCTs remains controversial. Most studies on the treatment of PTRCTs have explained surgical techniques or outcomes; few studies have centralized on the conservative and new management of PTRCTs, like treatment with Platelet-rich plasma (PRP). These case series study have been conducted on Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injection, as a concentrated source of cytokines that can stimulate healing of soft tissue.

PRP injection showed positive effect on improving PTRCTs complains. This method improved pain, function, DASH score and shoulder joint range motion in. Because of PRP products are safe and easy to prepare and apply, and also according to improving patient’s condition, this method can be used to treat PTRCTs.

Keywords: Partial thickness rotator cuff tears, Platelet-rich plasma, PRP injection

Introduction

Partial thickness rotator cuff tear (PTRCTs) is a common pathology among shoulder disorders in people over 50 years old (1, 2). The prevalence of PTRCTs ranges from 13% to 32%, which is in part correlated to patients’ age (2-4). In 2002, the mean cost of the physicians’ visits and almost 40,000 inpatient procedures on the rotator cuff was 14,000$ per case in the United States (5). Nearly one third of the silent rotator cuff tears will become symptomatic through the following years. In particular, women are more susceptible to be affected by the common shoulder conditions (6, 7). The prevalence of degenerative rotator cuff tears will be increasing as the number of elderly grows in the population. Most studies on PTRCTs have explained surgical techniques or surgical outcomes; however, few studies have disussed the nonoperative modalities including platelet rich plasma (PRP) injection (2, 5, 7-13).

The use of PRP was first describes in 1999 by a research group in Vitoria in Spain for maxillofacial and plastic surgery (14). Recent researches have assessed the biologic enhancement of the healing process. PRP is potentially able to produce collagen, growth factors, and probably increase in the number so available stem cells, which consequently enhance healing by delivering high concentrations of alpha-granules containing biologically active moieties (such as vascular endothelial growth factor and transforming growth factor-β) to the areas of soft tissue damage (13, 15, 16). PRP has been shown to be safe and effective in most other fields including dermatology, dentistry and orthopedic surgery (8, 17, 18). This concentration may be applied either in the clinic as a nonoperative treatment or intraoperative (1, 3, 19-21).

In this study we aimed to assess the efficacy of local injection of autologous PRP on pain and function of the patients with PTRCTs.

Case presentation

Nineteen consecutive patients including 8 men and 11 women were enrolled and treated with an autologous PRP injection for the treatment of PTRCTs. The indication for PRP injection was physical examination and MRI findings consistent with type I, II and III of PTRCTs lasting more than at least 3 months based on the Ellman’s classification (grade 1: partial tear < 3mm deep, grade 2: partial tear 3-6 mm deep not exceeding one-half of the tendon thickness, grade 3: partial tear > 6 mm deep) (22). Of these patients, 21% (4 patients) were type I, 58% (11 patients) type II, and 21% (4 patients) were type III. While pain was the most common symptom, commom physical examination findings were painful arc of motion, crepitus, weakness, and positive impingement tests. In addition, some patients were having difficulty with overhead activities.

Patients were excluded if they exhibited any of the following criteria: previous surgery on the affected shoulder, evidence of infection, underlying metabolic or inflammatory disease, referred pain from the neck, bone marrow pathology, abnormal platelet count, use of systemic steroids, current use of anticoagulants (unless withdrawn 7-10 days before injection), and any conditions or situations that might place the patient at significant risk during the study.

Treatment and Experimental protocol

After the initial examination, the treatment protocol of autologous PRP injection was followed by educating the patients to perform shoulder stretching exercises. Two sets of 10 ml of the participant’s blood was drawn from the superficial saphenous vein by double syringe (syringe was distributed by Arthrex, Inc. USA). Next, the blood sample was centrifuged at 5000 rpm for five minutes to discrete the blood into layers of red blood cells, buffy-coat of leucocytes, and plasma (Arthrex, Inc. USA) and lastly PRP was separated (19, 23). We injected this product into the subacromial bursa and intra-articular space. After injection, all patients were allowed to move their shoulders and were trained to follow a home exercise program of shoulder stretching exercise. Routine visits were performed at 1 month intervals for 3 months.

Assessment was done before injection and 3 month after. Passive shoulder abduction and flexion was measured by the goniometer. Pain was measured by the visual analogue scale (VAS) with 0 indicating no pain and 10 indicating the worst possible pain). The Persian version of the Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire and SF-12 Health Survey questionnaire were used to assess the functional status.

Clinical Outcome

The average age of the patients was 56 ± 4.1 years (range, 50-63 years old). Right shoulder was injected in 14 patients and left shoulder was done in the other 5 patients.

The average pre-treatment flexion was 97 degrees and abduction was 91 degrees. Also scores for VAS, DASH, and SF-12 Health Survey questionnaire were 7.5, 34, and 32, respectively [Table 1]. After 3-month follow-up, all patients showed significant improvement in shoulder ROM, pain, and function. Patients reported 53% improvement in shoulder ROM, 66% in pain, 76% in DASH score, and 84% in SF-12 Health Survey questionnaire.

Table 1
Comparison of patiant’s outcomes before and after PRP injectins

Discussion

The repair of a partially torn rotator cuff tendon may be successfully performed through a variety of techniques such as open or arthroscopic methods. Repaired tissue often degenerates locally and might enhance a weak quality. A partial tear may be completed to a full thickness tear, which is then repaired as a full thickness rotator cuff tear. Moreover, complications of surgery including infection and shoulder stiffness have a relatively high prevalence (1-4, 20, 22). This has lead the surgeons to investigate the effect of intraoperative PRP injection (2, 7, 9, 11, 12, 24). Furthermore, some researches have shown that nonoperative treatment with PRP can be as effective as surgery in patients with PTRCTs.

Biologic augmentation strategies such as PRP offer the potential to improve healing in partial tears or in situations when prior repair has failed (2, 17, 25-27). The healing potential of PRP has been described to the release of multiple growth factors from the highly concentrated platelets. In recent studies, enhanced tendon repair was demonstrated following application of growth factors (5). Platelet derived growth factor (PDGF), epidermal growth factor (EGF), vascular endothelial growth factor, and transforming growth factor beta (TGF-b) are key cytokines existing at high levels in platelet rich plasma (PRP) (8, 28-30)

In this report, we evaluated the efficacy of PRP injection in patients with PTRCTs. After 3 month the result showed improvement in shoulder joint ROM, DASH score, pain and function, without any side effects or complications. Overall, the goal of PRP injection is to accelerate the natural healing cascade through the action of the elevated cytokine concentrations released during platelet degranulation, which probably stimulates the capillary regeneration (31-33).

Additional research with randomized clinical trials is warranted to determine the effect of this protocol and to be able to attribute the improvement to the PRP rather than the stretching exercise and other probable intervening factors (34). Other limitations were small number of the patients and short follow-up. We did not have a gold standard such as follow-up MRI or arthroscopy to prove the healing. However, we were able to assess the clinical outcomes. Future studies should investigate tendon healing using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

PRP injection showed positive effect on improving PTRCTs. This method improved pain, function, DASH score, and shoulder range of motion while it is safe too.

References

1. Barber FA, Hrnack SA, Snyder SJ, Hapa O. Rotator cuff repair healing influenced by platelet-rich plasma construct augmentation. Arthroscopy. 2011;27(8):1029–35. [PubMed]
2. Randelli PS, Arrigoni P, Cabitza P, Volpi P, Maffulli N. Autologous platelet rich plasma for arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. A pilot study. Disabil Rehabil. 2008;30(20-22):1584–9. [PubMed]
3. Cheung EV, Silverio L, Yao J. Delivered growth factor therapy to improve healing after rotator cuff repair. Stem Cells Cloning. 2010;3(1):135–44. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
4. Maniscalco P, Gambera D, Lunati A, Vox G, Fossombroni V, Beretta R, et al. The “Cascade” membrane: a new PRP device for tendon ruptures. Description and case report on rotator cuff tendon. Acta Biomed. 2008;79(3):223–6. [PubMed]
5. Fu CJ, Sun JB, Bi ZG, Wang XM, Yang CL. Evaluation of platelet-rich plasma and fibrin matrix to assist in healing and repair of rotator cuff injuries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Rehabil. 2017;31(2):158–72. [PubMed]
6. Lorbach O, Baums MH, Kostuj T, Pauly S, Scheibel M, Carr A, et al. Advances in biology and mechanics of rotator cuff repair. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2015;23(2):530–41. [PubMed]
7. Jo CH, Shin JS, Shin WH, Lee SY, Yoon KS, Shin S. Platelet-rich plasma for arthroscopic repair of medium to large rotator cuff tears: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Sports Med. 2015;43(9):2102–10. [PubMed]
8. Zhang JY, Fabricant PD, Ishmael CR, Wang JC, Petrigliano FA, Jones KJ. Utilization of platelet-rich plasma for musculoskeletal injuries: an analysis of current treatment trends in the United States. Orthop J Sports Med. 2016;4(12) 2325967116676241. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
9. Zhao JG, Zhao L, Jiang YX, Wang ZL, Wang J, Zhang P. Platelet-rich plasma in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Arthroscopy. 2015;31(1):125–35. [PubMed]
10. Wang A, McCann P, Colliver J, Koh E, Ackland T, Joss B, et al. Do postoperative platelet-rich plasma injections accelerate early tendon healing and functional recovery after arthroscopic supraspinatus repair?A randomized controlled trial. Am J Sports Med. 2015;43(6):1430–7. [PubMed]
11. Carr A, Cooper C, Murphy R, Watkins B, Wheway K, Rombach I, et al. PARot--assessing platelet-rich plasma plus arthroscopic subacromial decompression in the treatment of rotator cuff tendinopathy: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2013;14(1):167. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
12. Antuna S, Barco R, Martinez Diez JM, Sanchez Marquez JM. Platelet-rich fibrin in arthroscopic repair of massive rotator cuff tears: a prospective randomized pilot clinical trial. Acta Orthop Belg. 2013;79(1):25–30. [PubMed]
13. Sheth U, Simunovic N, Klein G, Fu F, Einhorn TA, Schemitsch E, et al. Efficacy of autologous platelet-rich plasma use for orthopaedic indications: a meta-analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012;94(4):298–307. [PubMed]
14. Anitua E. Plasma rich in growth factors: preliminary results of use in the preparation of future sites for implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1999;14(4):529–35. [PubMed]
15. Nourissat G, Mainard D, Kelberine F. Current concept for the use of PRP in arthroscopic surgery. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2013;99(8 Suppl):S407–10. [PubMed]
16. Nixon AJ, Watts AE, Schnabel LV. Cell- and gene-based approaches to tendon regeneration. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2012;21(2):278–94. [PubMed]
17. Weeks KD, 3rd, Dines JS, Rodeo SA, Bedi A. The basic science behind biologic augmentation of tendon-bone healing: a scientific review. Instr Course Lect. 2014;63(1):443–50. [PubMed]
18. Taylor DW, Petrera M, Hendry M, Theodoropoulos JS. A systematic review of the use of platelet-rich plasma in sports medicine as a new treatment for tendon and ligament injuries. Clin J Sport Med. 2011;21(4):344–52. [PubMed]
19. Hall MP, Band PA, Meislin RJ, Jazrawi LM, Cardone DA. Platelet-rich plasma: current concepts and application in sports medicine. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2009;17(10):602–8. [PubMed]
20. Cheung EV, Silverio L, Sperling JW. Strategies in biologic augmentation of rotator cuff repair: a review. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468(6):1476–84. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
21. Bava ED, Barber FA. Platelet-rich plasma products in sports medicine. Phys Sportsmed. 2011;39(3):94–9. [PubMed]
22. Ellman H. Diagnosis and treatment of incomplete rotator cuff tears. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1990;254:64–74. [PubMed]
23. Beck J, Evans D, Tonino PM, Yong S, Callaci JJ. The biomechanical and histologic effects of platelet-rich plasma on rat rotator cuff repairs. Am J Sports Med. 2012;40(9):2037–44. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
24. Maffulli N, Longo UG, Loppini M, Berton A, Spiezia F, Denaro V. Tissue engineering for rotator cuff repair: an evidence-based systematic review. Stem Cells Int. 2012;2012(10):418086. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
25. Moraes VY, Lenza M, Tamaoki MJ, Faloppa F, Belloti JC. Platelet-rich therapies for musculoskeletal soft tissue injuries. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;29(4):CD010071. [PubMed]
26. Randelli P, Randelli F, Ragone V, Menon A, D'Ambrosi R, Cucchi D, et al. Regenerative medicine in rotator cuff injuries. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014(12):129515. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
27. Andia I, Maffulli N. Muscle and tendon injuries: the role of biological interventions to promote and assist healing and recovery. Arthroscopy. 2015;31(5):999–1015. [PubMed]
28. LaPrade RF, Geeslin AG, Murray IR, Musahl V, Zlotnicki JP, Petrigliano F, et al. Biologic treatments for sports injuries II think tank-current concepts, future research, and barriers to advancement, part 1: biologics overview, ligament injury, tendinopathy. Am J Ports Med. 2016;44(12):3270–83. [PubMed]
29. Malavolta EA, Assuncao JH, Gracitelli ME, Ferreira Neto AA. Comments on: evaluation of platelet-rich plasma and fibrin matrix to assist in healing and repair of rotator cuff injuries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Rehabil. 2016;30(7):726–7. [PubMed]
30. Zumstein MA, Rumian A, Thelu CE, Lesbats V, O'Shea K, Schaer M, et al. SECEC Research Grant 2008 II: use of platelet- and leucocyte-rich fibrin (L-PRF) does not affect late rotator cuff tendon healing: a prospective randomized controlled study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2016;25(1):2–11. [PubMed]
31. Gobbi A, Fishman M. Platelet-rich plasma and bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells in sports medicine. Sports Med Arthrosc. 2016;24(2):69–73. [PubMed]
32. Greenspoon JA, Moulton SG, Millett PJ, Petri M. The role of platelet rich plasma (PRP) and other biologics for rotator cuff repair. Open Orthop J. 2016;10(1):309–14. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
33. Gwinner C, Gerhardt C, Haneveld H, Scheibel M. Two-staged application of PRP in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a matched-pair analysis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2016;136(8):1165–71. [PubMed]
34. Ebrahimzadeh MH, Birjandinejad A, Golhasani F, Moradi A, Vahedi E, Kachooei AR. Cross-cultural adaptation, validation, and reliability testing of the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index in the Persian population with shoulder problems. Int J Rehabil Res. 2015;38(1):84–7. [PubMed]

Articles from Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery are provided here courtesy of Mashhad University of Medical Sciences