PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of scirepAboutEditorial BoardFor AuthorsScientific Reports
 
Sci Rep. 2017; 7: 16753.
Published online 2017 December 1. doi:  10.1038/s41598-017-17074-x
PMCID: PMC5711841

Disrupted superior collicular activity may reveal cervical dystonia disease pathomechanisms

Abstract

Cervical dystonia is a common neurological movement disorder characterised by muscle contractions causing abnormal movements and postures affecting the head and neck. The neural networks underpinning this condition are incompletely understood. While animal models suggest a role for the superior colliculus in its pathophysiology, this link has yet to be established in humans. The present experiment was designed to test the hypothesis that disrupted superior collicular processing is evident in affected patients and in relatives harbouring a disease-specific endophenotype (abnormal temporal discrimination). The study participants were 16 cervical dystonia patients, 16 unaffected first-degree relatives with abnormal temporal discrimination, 16 unaffected first-degree relatives with normal temporal discrimination and 16 healthy controls. The response of participant’s superior colliculi to looming stimuli was assessed by functional magnetic resonance imaging. Cervical dystonia patients and relatives with abnormal temporal discrimination demonstrated (i) significantly reduced superior collicular activation for whole brain and region of interest analysis; (ii) a statistically significant negative correlation between temporal discrimination threshold and superior collicular peak values. Our results support the hypothesis that disrupted superior collicular processing is involved in the pathogenesis of cervical dystonia. These findings, which align with animal models of cervical dystonia, shed new light on pathomechanisms in humans.

Introduction

Cervical dystonia is a hyperkinetic movement disorder characterised by sustained or intermittent muscle contractions causing abnormal movements and postures1. It is the most common phenotype of adult onset focal isolated dystonia (AOIFD), of which several phenotypes exist. The pathogenesis and the neural networks underpinning this condition remain unknown. While cervical dystonia is considered to be essentially due to basal ganglia dysfunction16, mounting evidence indicates a wider network disorder involving cortical, subcortical and cerebellar regions79. Understanding how these various structures interact with the basal ganglia is important when considering possible pathomechanisms in cervical dystonia1012. Subcortical structures including the midbrain interstitial nucleus of Cajal, midbrain neural integrators and the superior colliculus form part of this network and have been implicated in its pathogenesis1317. Alterations in basal ganglia-brainstem and cerebellum-brainstem connections are also considered important1821. Disruption of inhibitory input to the superior colliculus in macaques results in a primate model of cervical dystonia17,22. While deficient inhibition has long been considered important in the pathogenesis of dystonia23, how the superior colliculus fits into this paradigm has yet to be studied in humans.

Cervical dystonia is postulated to be a poorly penetrant autosomal dominant condition1820. However causative genes have been identified in <1% of cases1517. This shortfall in gene discovery has stimulated a search for endophenotypes and alternative pathomechanistic theories22. Aberrant sensorimotor plasticity has been linked to the pathogenesis of dystonia8,23,24, in particular focal-hand dystonia, a phenotype of AOIFD frequently associated with overuse2428; cervical dystonia has been less well studied29. The concept of sensory dysfunction as being primary to the development of cervical dystonia is supported by the co-existence of sensory symptoms including geste-anatagoniste3032. Tactile and visual perception in dystonia have been studied using the temporal discrimination threshold (TDT), which measures the ability to perceive two sequential sensory stimuli as being temporally separate. An abnormal TDT has emerged as a reliable mediational endophenotype for cervical dystonia and, as such, may help to uncover pathomechanims in cervical dystonia2224. This marker is abnormal in 97% of patients with cervical dystonia with a specificity of 98–100%23,2527 and demonstrates autosomal dominant transmission in families of patients with sporadic and familial cervical dystonia2527. Unaffected relatives and patients were selected in the present study to investigate the role of superior collicular dysfunction in cervical dystonia. Unaffected relatives with abnormal temporal discrimination (up to 50% of female relatives & 20% male relatives33) are hypothesised to be non-manifesting gene carriers. This group may thus manifest similar alterations in brain activity to patients (without the complication of secondary effects due to motor manifestations). These unaffected relatives form an interesting study group because, by studying them one may examine disordered brain activation resulting from the endophenotype alone (an abnormal TDT) without the secondary effects from phenotype manifestation (cervical dystonia).

Covert attentional orienting detects change in the environment and alerts the individual to a salient stimulus; the superior colliculus is a key node involved in this process34,35. Detection of environmental change confers survival advantage amongst species and relies on the accurate detection of approaching (looming) objects3638. Looming-sensitive neurons have been identified in the superficial layer of the optic tectum in early vertebrates and in the superior colliculus in mammals39,40. In man, a functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) study revealed that looming stimuli (but not random stimuli) activated the superior colliculus41.

To assess the relationship between temporal discrimination, superior colliculus activity and cervical dystonia, the aim of this study was to examine, by fMRI, the activation of the superior colliculi in response to looming stimuli in cervical dystonia patients, their unaffected relatives with normal and abnormal temporal discrimination and healthy controls.

Results

Temporal discrimination threshold testing

Temporal discrimination threshold testing results from sixty-four participants were expressed as Z-scores (Fig. 1). All sixteen cervical dystonia patients had abnormal TDTs (mean Z-score 4.3; SD ± 1.2). Sixteen of the thirty-two first degree relatives had abnormal TDTs (mean Z-score 4.5; SD ± 1.6) and sixteen had normal TDTs (mean Z-score 0.25; SD ± 0.82). All sixteen healthy control subjects had normal TDTs (mean Z-scores – 0.64; SD ± 1.02).

Figure 1
Participants’ temporal discrimination threshold Z-scores: Temporal discrimination threshold (TDT) Z-scores in 16 patients, 32 relatives and 16 healthy controls. The black open circles represent individual TDT Z-scores. An abnormal TDT Z-score ...

Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging study

Behavioural analysis

There was no statistical difference in responses times between the three conditions: looming stimuli, receding stimuli and random stimuli.

Whole brain analysis

Second level general linear model (GLM) analysis was carried out to include all 64 participants. Whole group analysis for the basic contrast 1-sample t-test (loom >/< 0, recede >/< 0 & random >/< 0) are presented (Fig. 2A). The loom condition demonstrated a significant and focal activation of both superior colliculi. The recede and random conditions failed to demonstrate statistically significant activations at superior collicular level. The activation in response to structured movement (loom & recede) was less focal than in the loom condition. The images for all visual input (loom, recede and random) showed a weaker activation pattern than that observed for structured movement. The 2-sample t-test contrast demonstrated a statistically significant cluster for the loom > random condition at both superior colliculi. No statistically significant clusters were observed within the superior colliculus boundary for the recede > random or the loom > recede condition. Segmented group analysis for the 1-sample and 2-sample t-test contrast is presented (Fig. 2B). A statistically significant cluster at superior collicular level is observed for both the looming condition and the loom > random condition in the normal TDT group. No such activations are observed for the abnormal TDT group. The recede and random conditions failed to demonstrate statistically significant clusters in either group at superior collicular level.

Figure 2
Whole brain analysis of superior collicular activation to visual stimuli: (A) Whole brain, whole group 2nd level general linear model (GLM) analysis in all 64 participants (16 patients, 32 unaffected relatives, 16 healthy controls) for the following basic ...

Whole group analysis for loom > random, recede > random and recede > random contrasts are presented for the 32 participants with normal TDT (unaffected relatives and healthy controls) and the abnormal TDT group (patients and unaffected relatives) (Fig. 3). A statistically significant cluster at superior collicular level is observed for the loom > random contrast (K = 299, p < 0.05) in the normal TDT group. This activation is not observed in the abnormal TDT group.

Figure 3
Whole brain, whole group analysis for the three different contrasts. Whole brain, whole group 2nd level general linear model (GLM) analysis in 32 participants with normal temporal discrimination threshold (TDT) and 32 participants with abnormal TDT for ...

Region of interest analysis

Effect of condition

The raw event-related time courses were extracted for loom, recede and random conditions from each participant’s superior colliculus. The greatest signal difference was observed between the loom and random condition (Fig. 4A). The peak percent signal change during the loom condition was observed at 4 seconds across participants with normal temporal discrimination. This peak percent signal change for the loom condition was absent in participants with abnormal TDTs. An independent-samples t-test was conducted to compare BOLD activations for the three main contrasts (loom > random, recede > random, loom > recede) for both the abnormal TDT and normal TDT group. A significant difference was observed for the loom > random contrast for the abnormal TDT group (M = −0.092, SD = 0.266) and the normal TDT group [M = 0.076, SD = 0.17; t (62) = 3.0, p = 0.004]. The magnitude of the differences in the means was very large (eta squared = 0.14) (Fig. 4B).

Figure 4
Event related time courses: (A) Event-related time course for the superior colliculus during the loom and random condition in two candidate subjects: one relative with abnormal temporal discrimination threshold (TDT) and one relative normal TDT. Red solid ...

A less significant difference was observed for the recede > random contrast for the abnormal TDT group (M = −0.12, SD = 0.32) and the normal TDT group [M = 0.02, SD = 0.19; t(62) = 2.05, p = 0.05]. The magnitude of the differences in the means was moderate (eta squared = 0.06). There was no significant difference observed for the loom > recede contrast for the abnormal TDT group (M = 0.027, SD = 0.17) and the normal TDT group [M = 0.05, SD 0.27; t (62) = 0.08, p = 0.768]. Participants were then divided into four groups (Group 1: patients; Group 2: relatives with abnormal TDT; Group 3: relatives with normal TDT; Group 4: Healthy controls). A one-way between-groups analysis of variance (ANOVA) was conducted to explore the impact of group level on loom > random peak value. There was a statistically significant difference at the p < 0.05 in loom > random peak values for the four groups [F (3,60) = 5.85, p < 0.001]. The difference in the mean scores was large. The effect size, calculated using eta squared, was 0.23. Post-hoc comparisons using the Turkey Honest Significant Difference test indicated that the most statistically significant group difference was observed between relatives with abnormal TDTs (M = −0.18, SD 0.33) and relatives with normal TDTs (M = 0.12, SD = 0.20, p < 0.001).

Correlation analysis with temporal discrimination threshold

The relationship between superior collicular BOLD activation for each contrast (as measured by the peak percent signal) and TDT Z-score was investigated using Pearson Product-moment correlation-coefficient. Preliminary analysis was performed to ensure no violation of the assumption of normality, linearity and homoscedasticity. There was a statistically significant negative correlation between the loom > random contrast and TDT Z-score [r = −0.25, n = 62, p < 0.04], with lower levels of superior collicular activation associated with a higher (abnormal) TDT Z-score (Fig. (Fig.55).

Figure 5
Correlation analysis: Pearson’s product moment correlation-coefficient analysis examining the relationship between superior collicular peak percent signal change for the loom > random contrast and temporal discrimination ...

There was a non-significant negative correlation between the recede > random contrast and TDT Z-score [r = −0.22, n = 62, p < 0.08]. There was a lack of association observed between the loom > recede contrast and TDT Z-score [r = 0.006, n = 62, p < 0.96].

Discussion

Our results reveal that patients with cervical dystonia and their unaffected relatives with abnormal temporal discrimination, demonstrated (i) disrupted superior collicular activation; (ii) significantly reduced superior collicular activation for whole brain and region of interest analysis; and (iii) a statistically significant negative correlation between TDT Z-score and superior collicular peak values. These findings which provide evidence of a functional abnormality within the superior colliculus in both patients and first-degree relatives carrying a disease-specific endophenotype supports the hypothesis that dysfunctional superior collicular processing may be involved in the pathogenesis of cervical dystonia.

Our experimental paradigm was constructed principally to activate the superficial layer of the superior colliculus during the loom condition41. During whole-brain, whole-group analysis, we observed a significant and focal activation of the superior colliculus for the loom condition, whereas the recede and random conditions failed to induce significant activation within the superior colliculus boundary. The random condition produced the least superior collicular activation and the loom > random contrast revealed the most statistically significant cluster at superior collicular level. This contrast maximised superior collicular activation and controlled for inter-subject variability across participants. Our initial findings confirmed that our experimental paradigm was a robust method for producing superior collicular activation and aligned with the existing literature regarding optimal superior collicular activation39,40. Following our initial results, we proceeded to examine for any group differences observed during whole-brain analysis.

Whole-brain analysis revealed a between-group difference in superior collicular activation for the loom condition. Participants with abnormal temporal discrimination (cervical dystonia patients and relatives) had an absence of superior collicular activation to looming stimuli. There was no statistically significant difference amongst the cervical dystonia patients between the loom, recede and random conditions. In contrast, participants with normal temporal discrimination (relatives and controls) showed a significant activation to looming stimuli at superior collicular level. The absence of a normal activation pattern observed in participants with abnormal temporal discrimination (the endophenotype) suggests that they have disrupted superior collicular processing. To explore this, further, we proceeded to region-of-interest analysis, specifically focusing on functional activations at superior collicular level.

To improve the accuracy of region-of-interest analysis, we defined our superior collicular boundaries using anatomical landmarks determined at neuropathological dissection. Despite recent developments in automated anatomical labelling for cortical structures42, and detailed probabilistic atlases of macroscopic anatomy43,44, anatomical definition at individual level remains the optimal approach for ROI definition of small subcortical structures like the superior colliculus45.

Region-of-interest analysis revealed a statistically significant between-group difference in superior collicular activation. Patients and relatives with abnormal temporal discrimination had statistically significantly reduced superior collicular activation for the loom condition compared to participants with normal temporal discrimination. The greatest between-group difference in superior collicular activation was observed when comparing relatives with abnormal temporal discrimination and relatives with normal temporal discrimination. This between-group difference noted in superior collicular activation was further supported by the raw event-related time series extracted from each individual participant’s region-of-interest. In this analysis, the extracted peak signal from an individual’s superior colliculus should occur at four seconds. In participants with normal temporal discrimination a four second peak signal was observed for the loom condition. However, in those with abnormal temporal discrimination there was a reverse of this peak signal for the loom condition at four seconds (Fig. 4A).

Amongst cervical dystonia patients, there was no significant difference in either whole brain or region of interest analysis between those receiving regular botulinum toxin (BoNT) injections (n = 13) and those who did not (n = 3). Previous functional imaging studies have demonstrated a partial restoration of abnormal brain activations following BoNT injections4649. Unlike our study, these protocols were devised to specifically examine the effect of BoNT on abnormal brain activations and imaging was frequently performed before and after injections. In our study repeat imaging was not performed and intervals following the last BoNT injection were variable. As such it was unlikely that any differences would exist between the two groups.

The findings from whole brain and region-of-interest analysis were corroborated further by correlation analysis. This analysis demonstrated a statistically significant negative correlation between superior collicular peak activations and individual TDT Z-scores, indicating that as superior collicular activation diminished, TDT Z-score increased (or worsened). The above findings suggest that superior collicular dysfunction may be involved in the disease-specific endophenotype (abnormal temporal discrimination). In accordance with the mediational endophenotype model which implies that one cannot acquire the disease without first having the endophenotype50, the superior colliculus is thus likely to play an important role in the pathogenesis of cervical dystonia.

The superior colliculus is one of the most GABAergic brain regions51 and the superficial layer is principally composed of GABAergic neurons.

Under normal conditions, neurons in the superficial layer of the superior colliculus respond to looming stimuli39,40; the time of the peak response in these neurons is linearly related to the size/speed ratio of the approaching object52. In our study, participants with normal temporal discrimination had this predicted response - a statistically significant greater activation to looming stimuli (loom > random contrast) at superior collicular level. Conversely, participants with abnormal temporal discrimination failed to demonstrate such activations. In this group - cervical dystonia patients and relatives with abnormal temporal discrimination - there was no significant superior collicular activation to looming stimuli. Thus, disrupted superior collicular processing is unique to those with an abnormal TDT (i.e. those with the endophenotype) and is independent of phenotype (cervical dystonia or unaffected relatives). This suggests that processing intrinsic to the superior colliculus is involved in the process of temporal discrimination.

Any reduction in GABA activity will not only have functional consequences for this dorsal midbrain structure but also its connections. The visuosensory neurons in the superficial layer of the superior colliculus exert inhibitory influences on the pre-motor neurons in the intermediate and deep layer of the superior colliculus53,54. The deep layer in turn projects via the tecto-reticulospinal and tectospinal pathways to the upper cervical spinal cord5558. Prolonged duration firing of visuosensory neurons because of impaired GABA inhibition would cause hyperexcitability of the pre-motor neurons in the deep layer of the superior colliculus. These hyperexcitable premotor neurons could stimulate motor neurons in the upper cervical spinal cord perhaps resulting in the abnormal, jerky head spasms characteristic of cervical dystonia.

The findings from our study that superior collicular processing is disrupted in both patients and relatives harbouring the endophenotype (an abnormal TDT), supports the hypothesis that disrupted superior collicular processing is involved temporal discrimination. As an abnormal TDT is a mediational endophenotype for cervical dystonia, we might assume that disordered sensory processing in the superior colliculus is also involved in the pathogenesis of this condition.

Potential Limitations

While the results of this study support a model of reduced superior collicular GABAergic activity as contributing to sensory processing abnormalities and motor features of cervical dystonia, our study cannot determine the exact level at which this deficit arises; this GABAergic deficit may, in fact, be upstream of the superior colliculus. Further research is required to determine this. A Dynamic Causal Modelling (DCM) study may be instructive in this regard as it may identify where the superior colliculus fits within a given brain network and how these connections are impacted by abnormal TDTs and dystonia.

Methods

Participants and Methods

Ethical approval for this work was granted by the Ethics and Medical Research Committee, St. Vincent’s University Hospital, Elm Park, Dublin 4, Ireland. All experiments were performed in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants for study participation and publication of identifying information/images.

All participants

To examine any functional differences between those with a normal TDT versus those with an abnormal TDT the study was planned to have an equal representation from the following four groups; cervical dystonia patients, relatives with abnormal TDT, relatives with normal TDTs and healthy controls.

Sixty-four, age- and sex-matched participants (16 cervical dystonia patients, 16 first-degree relatives with abnormal TDT, 16 relatives with normal TDT and 16 healthy controls) were recruited. The mean age of study participants was 52.2 years (SD ± 7.75 years). Forty-two were women.

All participants had normal cognition, normal visual acuity, absence of sensory symptoms and a normal sensory examination.

Cervical dystonia patients

Sixteen cervical dystonia patients (10 women; four familial, 12 sporadic) (mean age 53.5 years; SD ± 6.9 years) were recruited from the dystonia clinic at St. Vincent’s University Hospital. Each patient’s clinical diagnosis was confirmed by two neurologists with expertise in dystonia. Thirteen patients were receiving regular botulinum toxin injections for their dystonia at the time of scanning. The mean time since last injection in these patients was 41 days (SD ± 24 days).

Amongst the group receiving regular botulinum toxin injections, three patients were taking regular clonazepam and four patients were on anti-depressant medication. Of those not receiving regular botulinum toxin injections, none were taking regular medications.

Unaffected relatives

Thirty-two unaffected first-degree relatives were recruited (22 women, mean age 52.1 years; SD ± 8.7 years). Seven had first-degree relatives with familial cervical dystonia; 25 had first-degree relatives with sporadic cervical dystonia. All were clinically examined by two neurologists with expertise in dystonia; none had any evidence of dystonia or dystonic tremor.

Healthy control participants

From hospital staff and relatives of the research team sixteen healthy control participants were recruited (10 women; mean age 51.0 years; SD ± 8.0 years).

Sensory testing

Visual and tactile TDT testing was carried out in a single session, in a sound-proofed, darkened room. This method and has been previously described (Kimmich et al., 2011).

Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI)

Participants

Structural and functional MRI images were acquired from all 64 age- and sex-matched participants that participated in the behavioural experiment (16 cervical dystonia patients, 32 first-degree relatives and 16 healthy controls).

Billington et. al in a previous study investigated the processing of looming at whole brain and superior collicular level41. Their study was statistically powered to show differences between loom and recede in a cohort of ten participants aged between 20–40 years. As our study was conducted on an older population we increased the number of participants by 60% to ensure the study was sufficiently appropriately powered.

Structural acquisition

MRI data was collected on a Philips 3T Achieva MRI Scanner. A high-resolution three dimensional T1-weighted magnetisation-prepared rapid-acquisition gradient echo (MPRAGE) sequence was acquired (TR = 8.4 ms; TE = 3.9 ms, TI = 1150 ms, flip angle = 8 degrees) with a transverse orientation, a 256 × 256 matrix size and 0.9 mm isotropic voxels.

Functional acquisition

Functional images were collected using 40 slices covering the whole brain (slice thickness 3 mm, inter-slice distance 0 mm, in-plane resolution 3 × 3 mm) with an echo planar imaging (EPI) sequence (TR = 2 s, TE = 25 ms, flip angle = 90°). To ensure full coverage of the superior colliculi we orientated the slices parallel to the brainstem at the height of the pons. The first four volumes from each run were discarded to avoid T1 equilibrium effects.

fMRI stimulus presentation

The visual paradigm, based on41 was an event-related design developed in Presentation Software (Neurobehavioral Systems Inc., Albany, CA, USA) and viewed by participants by way of an angled mirror located 30.48 cm from their eyes. To increase the perceived effect of 3-dimensional movement, thus increasing the likelihood of superior colliculus activation, a patch covered the right eye for the duration of the experiment. Participants were presented with three stimulus conditions: looming, receding and random motion (Fig. 6).

Figure 6
Experimental visual stimulus paradigm. Screen capture of the sequence of events that occurs during each of the three conditions incorporated into the experimental paradigm. The colour of the vertical lines indicates the trial type: loom (green), recede ...

fMRI analysis

Statistical parametric mapping software (SPM12 www.fil.ion.ucl.ac.uk/spm), running under Matlab 8.5 (Mathworks, Sherborn, MA, USA), was used to pre-process and analyse the data according a previously described pipeline59. Briefly, pre-processing consisted of resetting the origin, realignment, unwrapping, co-registration, segmentation and normalisation.

The origin was reset to the anterior commissure to align functional and anatomical images in the same plane60. The first four images from each session were discarded to allow for equilibrium magnetisation. EPI blood oxygen level-dependent (BOLD) images were re-aligned and re-sliced using a six parameter spatial transformation with the first non-discarded image as a reference. Estimated motion parameters calculated during the re-alignment step were saved for later use as nuisance regressors in the first level general linear model. Co-registration of functional and structural T1-weighted images was completed automatically and confirmed by careful visual inspection to ensure accurate alignment. The unified segmentation routine was employed to perform the segmentation bias correction and spatial normalisation. Structural and functional volumes were normalised in Montreal Neurological Institute (MNI) space using the standard International Consortium for Brain Mapping (ICBM) template to facilitate group analysis. Smoothed images were generated using a kernel with 8 mm full-width at half maximum for whole brain analysis. Region of interest (ROI) analysis at the individual level was carried out on unsmoothed data. A single general linear model (GLM) was created for each subject which incorporated the regressors of interest (loom, recede and random motion) and nuisance regressors to account for discontinuity between recordings. The duration of each event corresponded to the timing of stimulus movement and was set to one second. The time-period between stimulus offset and the button press response was excluded from each event to avoid modelling an early motor preparatory response. The six movement parameters estimated during the re-alignment procedure were included as nuisance regressors to account for unwanted movement.

Whole brain analysis

A whole brain one-sample and two-sample t-test using condition estimates (beta values) from a first level effect GLM analysis was performed to compare whole brain activation associated with each experimental condition (loom, recede, random motion). A set of contrast images for each participant was generated for testing at group level. The contrast images were divided into two groups: basic 1-sample t-test which tested for activation against a 0 background (condition>/<0) and contrast 2-sample t-tests which looked for differences in activation between different conditions (condition A>/<condition B). The contrast images were generated at the first level and then submitted to second level analysis. To test for group differences in superior colliculus activation the 64 participants were divided in to two groups: those with abnormal TDT (n = 32, patients and abnormal relatives) and normal TDT (n = 32, normal relatives and controls). A repeat 2nd level analysis was calculated for each group incorporating the contrasts examined in the whole group analysis.

Superior colliculus boundary definition for region of interest analysis

Imaging of the superior colliculus is difficult due its small size, its proximity to major blood vessels and anatomical variation that exists between subjects61. Accurate delineation of superior collicular anatomical boundaries is necessary to ensure optimal region of interest analysis45. To achieve this, we identified the anatomical landmarks of the superior colliculus during neuropathological dissection of human brainstem specimens. A consultant neuropathologist dissected the brainstem specimen and identified the anatomical boundaries of left and right superior colliculus (Fig. 7A). The diameter of each superior colliculus was measured and noted to be 7 mm. Using these pre-defined anatomical boundaries, we created 3-D regions of interest (ROIs) using Mango image processing software (Lancaster, Martinez; www.ric.uthscsa.edu/mango). Spheres were hand-placed on individual participant’s superior colliculi by a neuroradiologist blinded to participant status (Fig. 7B).

Figure 7
Region of interest anatomical definition: (A) Human cadaver brainstem specimen used during a neuro-pathological dissection. A consultant neuropathologist dissected the brainstem specimen and identified the anatomical landmarks of the left and right superior ...

Structural T1-weighted images were used for ROI definition. The axial-plane centre point was defined as a point equidistant from the posterior surface of the superior colliculus to the anterior border of the superior colliculus (posterior border of the posterior commissure). On the sagittal plane a vertical line was drawn from the superior border of the superior colliculus to the indentation between the superior and inferior colliculi: where this line crossed a line equidistant to the medial and lateral border of the superior colliculus our centre-point was set. The measured diameter of an individual superior colliculus at gross dissection was 7 mm. To compensate for the difference between slice-thickness (3 mm) and inter-slice difference (0 mm), 3 mm was added to the diameter prior to estimating the radius.

7 mm (measured diameter) + 3 mm (difference) = 10 mms ÷ 2 = 5 mm (radius)

Individual ROIs were then incorporated into the pre-processing pipeline.

Region of interest analysis

Effect of condition

The raw event-related time courses were extracted from each participant’s superior colliculus using methodology from a previous study in healthy control adult participants41. The three stimulus types (looming, receding and random motion) were modelled at the first level and incorporated into a second level analysis. To calculate the change in BOLD signal over time within the region of interest, percent signal change time courses were estimated for individual subjects. The peak was taken as a more accurate estimate of the magnitude of an individual’s functional activation than the beta estimate62. Participants were grouped according to normal or abnormal TDT for ROI analysis. The extracted peak percent signal change was directly compared by means of an independent Student t-test for three main contrasts - loom > random, recede > random and loom > recede. By comparing contrast of conditions (as opposed to conditions) within subjects, we reduced the potential for noise that may arise from inter-subject variability.

Correlation analysis with temporal discrimination threshold

To explore the relationship between temporal discrimination and BOLD activations at superior collicular level, participant TDT Z-scores was correlated with the peak percentage signal change in the region of interest for the three main contrasts (looming > random, recede > random, loom > recede). Participants were grouped according to normal or abnormal TDT for correlation analysis.

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article63.

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by grants from: Health Research Board of Ireland (CSA 2012-7), Dystonia Ireland, the Irish Institute for Clinical Neuroscience, Foundation for Dystonia Research (Belgium) and Trinity Centre for BioEngineering.

Author Contributions

Author Contributions

M.H. developed the hypothesis for the study. E.Mc.G., O.K., B.Q., S.N., J.B., R.R. and M.H. designed the experiment. E.Mc.G., O.K., B.Q., S.N., R.B., L.W., I.B. collected the data. E.Mc.G., O.K., B.Q., S.N., R.R. performed the statistical analysis. M.F. performed the neuropathological dissection of the brainstem specimen. E.Mc.G., S.N. assisted in the neuropathological dissection. R.K., E.Mc.G. identified neuroradiological landmarks of the region of interest and hand-placed the spheres for region of interest analysis. E.Mc.G., S.O’.R., M.H. wrote the paper. All authors reviewed the Manuscript.

Notes

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

1. Albin RL, Young AB, Penney JB. The functional anatomy of basal ganglia disorders. Trends Neurosci. 1989;12:366–75. doi: 10.1016/0166-2236(89)90074-X. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
2. DeLong MR. Primate models of movement disorders of basal ganglia origin. Trends Neurosci. 1990;13:281–5. doi: 10.1016/0166-2236(90)90110-V. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
3. Galardi G, et al. Basal ganglia and thalamo-cortical hypermetabolism in patients with spasmodic torticollis. Acta Neurol. Scand. 1996;94:172–6. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0404.1996.tb07049.x. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
4. Wilson BK, Hess EJ. Animal models for dystonia. Mov. Disord. 2013;28:982–989. doi: 10.1002/mds.25526. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
5. Nelson AB, Kreitzer AC. Reassessing Models of Basal Ganglia Function and Dysfunction. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 2014;37:117–135. doi: 10.1146/annurev-neuro-071013-013916. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
6. Delnooz CCS, Pasman JW, Beckmann CF, van de Warrenburg BPC. Altered striatal and pallidal connectivity in cervical dystonia. Brain Struct. Funct. 2015;220:513–523. doi: 10.1007/s00429-013-0671-y. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
7. Neychev VK, Fan X, Mitev VI, Hess EJ, Jinnah HA. The basal ganglia and cerebellum interact in the expression of dystonic movement. Brain. 2008;131:2499–2509. doi: 10.1093/brain/awn168. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
8. Vidailhet M, Grabli D, Roze E. Pathophysiology of dystonia. Curr. Opin. Neurol. 2009;22:406–13. doi: 10.1097/WCO.0b013e32832d9ef3. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
9. Neychev VK, Gross RE, Lehéricy S, Hess EJ. & Jinnah, H. a. The functional neuroanatomy of dystonia. Neurobiol. Dis. 2011;42:185–201. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2011.01.026. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
10. Hendrix CM, Vitek JL. Toward a network model of dystonia. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2012;1265:46–55. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2012.06692.x. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
11. Malone A, Manto M, Hass C. Dissecting the Links Between Cerebellum and Dystonia. Cerebellum. 2014;13:666–668. doi: 10.1007/s12311-014-0601-4. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
12. Prudente CN, Hess EJ, Jinnah HA. Dystonia as a network disorder: What is the role of the cerebellum? Neuroscience. 2014;260:23–35. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2013.11.062. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
13. Hassler R, Hess WR. [Experimental and anatomical findings in rotatory movements and their nervous apparatus] Arch. Psychiatr. Nervenkr. Z. Gesamte Neurol. Psychiatr. 1954;192:488–526. doi: 10.1007/BF00342860. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
14. Klier EM, Wang H, Constantin AG, Crawford JD. Midbrain Control of Three-Dimensional Head Orientation. Science (80-.). 2002;295:1314–1316. doi: 10.1126/science.1067300. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
15. Shaikh AG, Zee DS, Crawford JD, Jinnah HA. Cervical dystonia: a neural integrator disorder. Brain. 2016;139:2590–2599. doi: 10.1093/brain/aww141. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
16. Holmes AL, et al. Superior colliculus mediates cervical dystonia evoked by inhibition of the substantia nigra pars reticulata. J. Neurosci. 2012;32:13326–32. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2295-12.2012. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
17. Dybdal D, et al. Topography of dyskinesias and torticollis evoked by inhibition of substantia nigra pars reticulata. Mov. Disord. 2013;28:460–468. doi: 10.1002/mds.25215. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
18. Blood, A. J. et al. Evidence for altered basal ganglia-brainstem connections in cervical dystonia. PLoS One7 (2012). [PMC free article] [PubMed]
19. Hisatsune C, et al. IP3R1 deficiency in the cerebellum/brainstem causes basal ganglia-independent dystonia by triggering tonic Purkinje cell firings in mice. Front. Neural Circuits. 2013;7:156. doi: 10.3389/fncir.2013.00156. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
20. Hutchinson M, et al. Cervical dystonia: A disorder of the midbrain network for covert attentional orienting. Front. Neurol. 2014;5 APR:1–10. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
21. Sadnicka A, et al. All in the blink of an eye: new insight into cerebellar and brainstem function in DYT1 and DYT6 dystonia. Eur. J. Neurol. 2015;22:762–767. doi: 10.1111/ene.12521. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
22. Holmes AL, et al. Superior Colliculus Mediates Cervical Dystonia Evoked by Inhibition of the Substantia Nigra Pars Reticulata. 2012;32:13326–13332. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
23. Quartarone A, Hallett M. Emerging concepts in the physiological basis of dystonia. Mov. Disord. 2013;28:958–967. doi: 10.1002/mds.25532. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
24. Hallett M. Pathophysiology of writer’s cramp. Hum. Mov. Sci. 2006;25:454–463. doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2006.05.004. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
25. Charness ME, Schlaug G. Brain mapping in musicians with focal task-specific dystonia. Adv. Neurol. 2004;94:231–8. [PubMed]
26. Quartarone A, et al. Abnormal plasticity of sensorimotor circuits extends beyond the affected body part in focal dystonia. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry. 2008;79:985–990. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2007.121632. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
27. Hinkley LBN, Webster RL, Byl NN, Nagarajan SS. Neuroimaging Characteristics of Patients with Focal Hand Dystonia. J. Hand Ther. 2009;22:125–135. doi: 10.1016/j.jht.2008.11.002. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
28. Belvisi D, et al. Abnormal experimentally- and behaviorally-induced LTP-like plasticity in focal hand dystonia. Exp. Neurol. 2013;240:64–74. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2012.11.003. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
29. Zittel S, Helmich RC, Demiralay C, Münchau A, Bäumer T. Normalization of sensorimotor integration by repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in cervical dystonia. J. Neurol. 2015;262:1883–1889. doi: 10.1007/s00415-015-7789-1. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
30. Poisson A, et al. History of the ‘geste antagoniste’ sign in cervical dystonia. J. Neurol. 2012;259:1580–1584. doi: 10.1007/s00415-011-6380-7. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
31. Patel N, Hanfelt J, Marsh L, Jankovic J. Alleviating manoeuvres (sensory tricks) in cervical dystonia. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry. 2014;85:882–4. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2013-307316. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
32. Conte A, et al. Non-motor symptoms in patients with adult-onset focal dystonia: Sensory and psychiatric disturbances. Park. Relat. Disord. 2016;22:S111–S114. doi: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2015.09.001. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
33. Kimmich O, et al. Sporadic adult onset primary torsion dystonia is a genetic disorder by the temporal discrimination test. Brain. 2011;134:2656–63. doi: 10.1093/brain/awr194. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
34. Dean P, Redgrave P, Westby GWM. Event or emergency? Two response systems in the mammalian superior colliculus. Trends Neurosci. 1989;12:137–147. doi: 10.1016/0166-2236(89)90052-0. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
35. Furigo IC, et al. The role of the superior colliculus in predatory hunting. Neuroscience. 2010;165:1–15. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2009.10.004. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
36. Terry HR, Charlton SG, Perrone JA. The role of looming and attention capture in drivers’ braking responses. Accid. Anal. Prev. 2008;40:1375–82. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2008.02.009. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
37. Vagnoni E, Lourenco SF, Longo MR. Threat modulates perception of looming visual stimuli. Curr. Biol. 2012;22:2190–2202. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2012.07.053. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
38. Yilmaz M, Meister M. Rapid innate defensive responses of mice to looming visual stimuli. Curr. Biol. 2013;23:2011–2015. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2013.08.015. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
39. Wu L-Q, Niu Y-Q, Yang J, Wang S-R. Tectal neurons signal impending collision of looming objects in the pigeon. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2005;22:2325–31. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2005.04397.x. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
40. Liu Y-J, Wang Q, Li B. Neuronal responses to looming objects in the superior colliculus of the cat. Brain. Behav. Evol. 2011;77:193–205. doi: 10.1159/000327045. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
41. Billington J, Wilkie RM, Field DT, Wann JP. Neural processing of imminent collision in humans. Proc. Biol. Sci. 2011;278:1476–81. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2010.1895. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
42. Fischl B, et al. Automatically Parcellating the Human Cerebral Cortex. Cereb. Cortex. 2004;14:11–22. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhg087. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
43. Hammers A, et al. Three-dimensional maximum probability atlas of the human brain, with particular reference to the temporal lobe. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2003;19:224–47. doi: 10.1002/hbm.10123. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
44. Shattuck DW, et al. Construction of a 3D probabilistic atlas of human cortical structures. Neuroimage. 2008;39:1064–80. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.09.031. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
45. Poldrack RA. Region of interest analysis for fMRI. Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci. 2007;2:67–70. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsm006. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
46. Delnooz CCS, Pasman JW, Beckmann CF, van de Warrenburg BPC. Task-Free Functional MRI in Cervical Dystonia Reveals Multi-Network Changes That Partially Normalize with Botulinum Toxin. PLoS One. 2013;8:e62877. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0062877. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
47. Delnooz CCS, Pasman JW, van de Warrenburg BPC. Dynamic cortical gray matter volume changes after botulinum toxin in cervical dystonia. Neurobiol. Dis. 2015;73:327–333. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2014.10.013. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
48. Dresel C, et al. Botulinum toxin modulates basal ganglia but not deficient somatosensory activation in orofacial dystonia. Mov. Disord. 2011;26:1496–1502. doi: 10.1002/mds.23497. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
49. Opavský R, Hluštík P, Otruba P, Kaňovský P. Sensorimotor network in cervical dystonia and the effect of botulinum toxin treatment: A functional MRI study. J. Neurol. Sci. 2011;306:71–75. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2011.03.040. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
50. Kendler KS, Neale MC. Endophenotype: a conceptual analysis. Mol. Psychiatry. 2010;15:789–97. doi: 10.1038/mp.2010.8. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
51. Okada Y. The distribution and function of gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) in the superior colliculus. Prog. Brain Res. 1992;90:249–62. doi: 10.1016/S0079-6123(08)63617-1. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
52. Gale SD, Murphy XGJ. Active Dendritic Properties and Local Inhibitory Input Enable Selectivity for Object Motion in Mouse Superior Colliculus Neurons. 2016;36:9111–9123. [PubMed]
53. Sooksawate T, Isa K, Behan M, Yanagawa Y, Isa T. Organization of GABAergic inhibition in the motor output layer of the superior colliculus. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2011;33:421–32. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2010.07535.x. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
54. Endo T, Yanagawa Y, Obata K, Isa T. Characteristics of GABAergic neurons in the superficial superior colliculus in mice. Neurosci. Lett. 2003;346:81–4. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3940(03)00570-6. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
55. May PJ, Porter JD. The laminar distribution of macaque tectobulbar and tectospinal neurons. Vis. Neurosci. 1992;8:257–276. doi: 10.1017/S0952523800002911. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
56. Cowie RJ, Robinson DL. Subcortical contributions to head movements in macaques. I. Contrasting effects of electrical stimulation of a medial pontomedullary region and the superior colliculus. J. Neurophysiol. 1994;72:2648–64. [PubMed]
57. Nudo RJ, Masterton RB. Descending pathways to the spinal cord: II. Quantitative study of the tectospinal tract in 23 mammals. J. Comp. Neurol. 1989;286:96–119. doi: 10.1002/cne.902860107. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
58. Nudo RJ, Masterton RB. Descending pathways to the spinal cord: A comparative study of 22 mammals. J. Comp. Neurol. 1988;277:53–79. doi: 10.1002/cne.902770105. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
59. Ashburner, J. et al. SPM12 Manual The FIL Methods Group (and honorary members). Funct. Imaging Lab. 475–1, 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2006.02813.x (2013).
60. Naidich TP, et al. Anterior commissure: anatomic-MR correlation and use as a landmark in three orthogonal planes. Radiology. 1986;158:421–9. doi: 10.1148/radiology.158.2.3941867. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
61. DuBois RM, Cohen MS. Spatiotopic organization in human superior colliculus observed with fMRI. Neuroimage. 2000;12:63–70. doi: 10.1006/nimg.2000.0590. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
62. Gläscher J. Visualization of group inference data in functional neuroimaging. Neuroinformatics. 2009;7:73–82. doi: 10.1007/s12021-008-9042-x. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
63. Isa T, Sasaki S. Brainstem control of head movements during orienting; Organization of the premotor circuits. Prog. Neurobiol. 2002;66:205–241. doi: 10.1016/S0301-0082(02)00006-0. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group