PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of iranjotoHomeInstructions for authorsSubmit a manuscriptIranian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology
 
Iran J Otorhinolaryngol. 2017 September; 29(94): 275–285.
PMCID: PMC5610376

Pesticide Exposure and Head and Neck Cancers: A Case-Control Study in an Agricultural Region

Abstract

Introduction:

Causes of head and neck cancers (HNCs) are multifactorial, and few studies have investigated the association between chemical exposure and HNCs. The objective of this study was to investigate associations between HNCs, agricultural occupations, and pesticide exposure. The potential for the accumulation of pesticides in the adipose tissue of patients was also investigated.

Materials and Methods:

A structured questionnaire was used to collect information on demographics, occupation, and exposure to pesticides in a hospital-based case-control study. Pesticide residue in the adipose tissue of the neck in both cases and controls was also monitored via gas chromatography–mass spectroscopy.

Results:

Thirty-one HNC cases were included in this study as well as 32 gender-, age-, and smoking-matched controls. An agricultural occupation was associated with HNC (odds ratio [OR], 3.26; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.13–9.43) after controlling for age, sex, and smoking. Pesticide exposure was associated with total HNC cases (OR, 7.45; 95% CI, 1.78–3.07) and larynx cancer (OR, 9.33; 95% CI, 1.65–52.68). A dose-response pattern was observed for HNC cases (P=0.06) and larynx cancer (P=0.01). In tracing the pesticide residue, five chlorinated pesticides, namely dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane (DDT), dichlorodipheny-ldichloroethane (DDD), dichlorodiphenyldichloroethylene (DDE), dieldrin, and lindane, were identified in the adipose tissue. Chlorinated pesticide detection was significantly associated with HNC (OR, 3.91; 95% CI 0.9–0.16.9).

Conclusion:

HNCs were found to be associated with pesticide exposure after controlling for confounders. A high education level was identified as a modifying factor decreasing the risk of HNCs. Further studies with larger number of subjects are recommended to assess these relationships in greater detail.

Key Words: Agriculture, Head and neck, Organochlorine, Pesticide, Risk factor

Introduction

Cancer is one of the most important health problems all over the world, and the third highest cause of death in Iran (1). Head and neck cancers (HNCs) are defined as malignant tumors of the airways and upper digestive system (2), and are known to be the sixth most common cancer in the world (3). Cancers of the head and neck are categorized based on the area of the head or neck in which they originate, including the oral cavity, nose, pharynx, larynx, paranasal sinuses and nasal cavity, salivary glands, and thyroid. Larynx cancer is the most widespread type of HNC (4). HNCs accounted for an annual incidence of 690,000 cases (4.9% of all cancers) and almost 375,000 deaths (4.6% of all deaths from cancers) in the world in 2012 (5).

The causes of the different types of cancer are multifactorial and include physical, chemical and biological agents; for example, radiation, solvents, and pathogens (6). Smoking and alcohol are known to be the most common risk factors for HNCs (7). A considerable number of cancer risk factors have been reported in relation to various pesticides (810), but few associations between pesticides and cancer have been sufficiently studied in human populations. In particular, very few studies have examined the relationship between pesticides and HNCs, although some researchers have found a positive correlation between pesticides and HNCs (11,12). Pesticides are used for killing pest organisms and include substances that kill weeds (herbicides), insects (insecticides), fungi (fungicides), and rodents (rodenticides), for example. Pesticides have been linked to a wide range of human health hazards, ranging from short-term impacts such as headaches and nausea to chronic impacts such as cancer, allergies, neurological disorders, reproductive disorders, and endocrine disruption (13-15). Pesticides are mostly used in agriculture areas and may affect people who are involved with agricultural practice.

Kerman is the largest province of Iran, and is located in the south-east of the country. Over last 4 decades, the province has enjoyed an economy based primarily on agricultural activities. Kerman is one of the main agricultural regions of Iran and is the largest pistachio producer area all over the world (ca. 213300 ha). It is also one of the main regions producing citrus (ca. 42000 ha), palm (ca. 159300 ha), and vegetables (ca. 88300 ha) in Iran. Other fruit trees such as walnut and also cereals are among the other important products from the province (16). A distribution map of the various crops grown in the province of Kerman is shown in Figure 1. Due to the wide variety of crop products and large cultivation area in the Kerman province, various types of pesticides are used in this area (17).

Fig1
Schematic representation of crop distribution in the Kerman province (Iran

Most studies investigating the role of pesticides and cancer risk have been focused on cancers other than HNCs. Data on the relationship between exposure to pesticide and HNCs are rare. Moreover, the actual status of any association between pesticide exposure and disease in Iran is not well documented. The objective of the current study was to determine the relationship between exposure to pesticide and HNCs in the province of Kerman, with it’s a substantial agricultural labor force. In addition, the study also evaluated the possibility of pesticide accumulation in the fat tissue of cancer patients and controls.

Materials and Methods

A case-control study of HNCs was designed and conducted in Shafa Hospital of Kerman (Kerman, Iran). The current study was conducted from May 2011 to March 2015.

Cases and controls

The case group consisted of HNC patients who were candidates for neck surgery for various reasons, or HNC patients in whom sampling of the neck adipose tissue was possible. The control group were selected on the basis of benign lesions in the head and neck area. Since smoking and alcohol are known risk factors for HNC, in order to eliminate the effects of this factor all individuals in both the case and control groups were smokers and non-alcoholic.

Questionnaire

In order to collect data from both cases and controls, a structured questionnaire was developed based on a study by Kokouva et al. (18) (Appendix 1). The questionnaire included four different sections: 1) demographics,2) residence,3) occupation, 4) exposure and agricultural practice. The demographic section included age, sex, and level of education. The residence section included full address and residential level (urban and suburban or rural). In the occupational section, detailed information on the history of agricultural activities was reported. Individuals who reported at least 1 year of agricultural occupation were asked to complete the pesticide exposure section. Information collected included type of crop, pest and agricultural activities (farm manager, worker, or rancher) duration of farming, and the area of farming surface. The subjects were asked to provide the name of pesticide products, number of applications per year, method of application, and use of personal protective equipment (PPE). Additional information such as accuracy of the pesticide label, eating and smoking habits during pesticide application, and showering after spraying was also collected. The interviews were conducted by a trained ear, nose, and throat (ENT) resident.

Due to changes in pesticide exposure over time, an expert (pesticide toxicologist) evaluated each questionnaire and data collected regarding pesticide exposure and handling practice as well as commercial names of pesticides and method of application. Chemicals were grouped according to the target pest into three major classes: insecticides, fungicides, and herbicides. The level of pesticide exposure was based on protocols presented by Kokouva et al. (2011), with some modification (17).

Residential, occupational, and agricultural practice information was used for exposure categorization. Participants who had never worked within agricultural sectors as their main or secondary occupation and had lived in urban and suburban regions were classified in the “No/Low” exposure category. The following equations were used for determining the “Medium” and “High” exposure categories: number of treatments per year × total years of pesticide application × cultivation area (ha).

A value of 200 (application/ha) was set as the cutoff point between “Medium” and “High” exposure levels. Some modification factors were applied before the final categorization of “Medium” and “High” exposure groups. These factors were application of pesticides by the person (×1.3), using reduced exposure equipment during application (× 0.8), and use of PPE (×0.9).

Fat tissue biopsy

Adipose tissue biopsy was performed through a cervical incision. A segment of adipose tissue (ca. 2×1.5×1.5 cm) was resected. The adipose tissue was placed in a micro-tube and immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen. The samples were kept at −20°C until analysis.

Pesticide extraction

Pesticide residues from the adipose tissue were extracted according to the methods of Waliszewski et al. and Covaci et al. , with some modifications (19, 20). Approximately 1g of each sample was mixed with 0.5 g of anhydrous sodium sulfate, then the mixture was homogenized and extracted with 15 ml of hexane and diethyl ether (1:1) in a test tube with a glass stopper (2.5-cm diameter and 25-cm height) and stirred for 15 min. The solvents were then transferred to a clean tube. The extraction was continued by adding the solvent three times. The extracted mixture was concentrated by removal of the solvents using a vacuum pump. Then, the extract was mixed with 1 ml of concentrated sulfuric acid. The contents were then shaken for 30 s and the tube allowed to stand still for 5 min for phase separation. The supernatant was then dried by passing it through a 2-cm layer of sodium sulfate, which was then washed with diethyl ether. The final extract was concentrated to a small volume (ca 1 ml) and transferred to a darkened tube. Finally, 1 μl of the extract was injected into gas chromatograph for qualitative analysis.

Gas chromatography–mass spectrometry analysis: For gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS) analysis, an Agilent 6890 gas chromatograph with a 30 m–0.25 mm HP-5MS capillary column coupled with an Agilent 5973 mass spectrometer (Agilent Technologies, Palo Alto, CA) was used. The temperature program was 50°C (5 min) to 270°C at 7°C/min, held for 5 min in 270°C; the carrier gas was helium. Final detection of the components was based on a comparison between their mass spectra and those of the internal Wiley GC–MS spectral library.

Statistical analysis

Standard statistical procedures were carried out using Stata version 12 (StataCorp, College Station, TX, USA). Descriptive analysis was conducted for variables. The chi-square test was used to analyze qualitative data. Logistic regression was used to control for confounders and to identify risk factors.

Ethics The study was approved by the ethics committee of Kerman University of Medical Sciences. The participants also made a verbal agreement, and non-monetary incentives for participation were offered. Information collected through the questionnaires was also kept confidential.

Results

Overall, 31 cases and 32 controls were included in this study. Characteristics of the study population, including sex, age, agricultural occupation, pesticide exposure, and education level, are presented in Table 1. There were no significant differences between cases and control in terms of gender, age structure, or rate of smoking (Table.2). Due to the unequal distribution of these factors in the occurrence of cancer amongst cases and controls, the factors were considered confounding factors. Therefore, further studies were not performed based on these factors.

Table 1
Description of the study population
Table 2
Characteristics of the case and control groups

The educational status of the case and control groups is summarized in Table 3. The level of education in the control group was significantly higher than that in the case group. Further, as shown in Table 3, statistical analysis revealed a significant association between exposure to pesticide and HNC cases, with an odds ratio (OR) of 1.47 and 7.45 for low- and high-exposure risks, respectively. A dose-response effect was observed for risk of HNC and was statistically significant for cases with a high-exposure risk (P=0.006). The results for laryngeal cancer, as the most common among HNCs, were similar (Table.4).

Table 3
Agricultural occupation, exposure risk, and educational level of HNCs compared with heathy controls
Table 4
Analysis of pesticide exposure risk among Larynx cancer cases and controls

Based on GC–MS analyses, only five chlorinated insecticides were detected in the analyzed samples, with none of the other pesticides detected. The number of detected cases in cancer patients was significantly greater than in the control group (Table.5). In the case group, organochlorine pesticides (OCPs) were detected in 11 of the subjects, compared with only three in the control group.

Table 5
Chlorinated pesticide detection distribution in case and control groups.

A summary of results for OCP detection is presented in Table 6. Only five OCPs, namely dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane (DDT), dichlo- rodiphenyldichloroethane (DDD), dichlorodiph enyldichloroethylene (DDE) (two metabolites of DDT), dieldrin, and lindane, were detected. The number of cases of pesticide detected differed significantly between the groups in terms of DDT, DDE, and dieldrin pesticides (P<0.05).

Table 6
Analysis of chlorinated pesticide detection in adipose tissue of HNC cases and controls

Discussion

This study found significant associations between agricultural occupation and risk of HNCs. It seems that increasing exposure to agrochemicals is the most important risk factor for cancers among agricultural occupations. As we found in this study, there were also significant associations between exposure to pesticides and HNCs after controlling for confounding factors. A dose-response relationship was also seen in all HNC cases, especially larynx cancer cases. Many chemicals such as pesticides are thought to have carcinogenic potential in animals and humans (8,10). A variety of chemical pesticides are used in the main groups of crops in Kerman. The general pattern of pesticide application in the province is briefly summarized in Table 7. These data are taken from the interview with farmers and recommended protocols of the Plant Protection Organization of Iran (17). The adverse effects of some of these pesticides have been studied in the literature. Some of the widely used pesticides in Kerman, such as amitraz, dichlorvos, diazinon, permethrin, chlorothalonil, meta-sodium, 2,4-D-glyphosate (2,4D), and 2-methyl-4-chlorophenoxyacetic acid (MCPA), were classified as probable/ possible human carcinogens by the United States (US) Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and/or International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC; Table.7) (21,22). Organophosphates (OPs) are the main group of pesticides used in Kerman, and many OPs and their metabolites have been shown to be carcinogenic (2326). Cabello et al. demonstrated that OPs can cause mammary tissue carcinogenesis in rats (27), while Isoda et al. reported an increased breast cancer risk as a consequence of exposure to dichlorvos, an OPs compound (28). Another widely used OP compound in Kerman is fenitrothion, which is thought to increase the androgen receptor activity of human cells in vitro (29). Several diseases such as prostate and breast cancer are also associated with alterations in androgen receptor functions (30,31). Chlorpyrifos is also suggested as a potential genotoxin on the human lymphocyte cell (32). Amer and Aly have investigated the genotoxicity of 2,4-D, a commonly used herbicide, on certain mice cells (33), and suggested 2,4-D as a potential genotoxic in vivo. Amitraz is a formamidine insecticide/acaricide widely used in pistachio orchards over the past 2 decades, although it has been banned in recent years (17). Amitraz is a highly liposoluble compound that is quickly absorbed thought the skin and mucous membrane, and is consequently potentially hazardous for human and animals. Genotoxicity of this pesticide has also been reported (34,35). Genotoxic potentiality is a primary risk factor for long-term effects such as carcinogenicity and reproductive toxicity (36,37).

Table 7
Pattern of pesticides application in Kerman province and the carcinogenicity classification of these agrochemicals

Interestingly, it should be noted that the use of detected OCPs has been restricted in Iran for the past 20 years or so. Nonetheless, these pesticides were wildly used for pest control in the agricultural, livestock, and health sectors between 1960 and 1990 in Iran. Pesticides have predominantly been used for controlling mosquitoes in large areas such as urban and suburban areas, and villages (38,39). Nearly all of the OCPs have been phased out of use in Iran and many other countries because their long residual life causes environmental hazards (30). These compounds are very stable in the environment and can remain in soil and water for a large number of years and enter the food chain (39,40).

Biomagnification factors for OCPs are reported to be up to 70,000 times (15). Thus, a huge amount of these compound can enter human food sources and ultimately be traced in the human body, without any direct contact with these toxins. Bioaccumulation and bioconcentration of these compounds in the human adipose tissue has also been reported in the literature (12,19,20,41). The detected OCPs are also listed as carcinogenic agents by the EPA and IARC (21,22). In vitro studies have shown OCPs to promote the growth of breast, ovarian and prostate cancer tumor cells via alteration of tumor suppressor genes (4244). Some case-control studies investigated the relationship between burden of OCPs in a woman’s body and breast cancer risk. Researchers have found a positive correlation in this issue and have reported that women with higher burdens were more likely to develop these cancers (45,46).

Pesticides such as 2,4-D, chlorpyrifos, glyphosate, diazinon, endosulfan, fenitrothion, lindane, dieldrin, DDT, DDE, mancozeb, permethrin and thiram are also defined as endocrine disruptors (ED) (21,26,47). Endocrine disruption refers to a mechanism of toxicity that hampers the hormonal communication of cells, tissues and organs, leading to a wide variety of adverse health consequences such as reproductive abnormalities, reduction in fertility and fecundity, alteration in sex ratios, spontaneous abortion, precocious puberty, polycystic ovary syndrome, impaired immune function, neurobehavioral disorders, and a wide range of cancers (26). Recently, exposure to ED pesticides has been demonstrated in the etiologies of several different cancers (45,48). Chemicals with ED properties can directly affect the DNA and cause changes that may result in abnormalities and cancers in the affected organs (49,50).

Very few epidemiologic studies have been able to evaluate cancer risk for a specific agrochemical. Several studies of field-related exposure have reported increasing risk of cancer such as childhood cancer (51), breast cancer (52), lymphohematopoietic cancer (18), lung cancers, and hormone-related cancers (53). Van Maele-Fabry and Willems found a positive and strong correlation between pesticide exposure and prostate cancer using meta-analysis studies (54), while human epidemiological studies have linked 2,4-D, to endocrine related cancers (55,56). However, no significant association between certain cancers and pesticide exposure was reported in some epidemiological studies (53,57,58). Thus far, strong causal links have not been confirmed between pesticides and human cancers, and most of the estimations are based on epidemiological studies and experiments on animals.

Literacy levels in this study differed between the two groups. A higher level of education increases the awareness of the chemical user, and may make the user more likely to read the chemical labels and use with greater protection. This is consistent with the findings of other researchers referring to the level of education as a potential factor in reducing exposure to different toxins (59,60).

Although all the patients in this study were smokers, and smoking was not significantly different between the groups, some points should be considered. First, smoking in pesticide-contaminated areas (e.g. during spraying) increases the possibility of allowing pesticides to enter the smoker’s body (61,62). Furthermore, pesticides may induce immune alterations and oxidative stress, and may reduce glutathione S-transferase activity in humans and animals. Glutathione conjugation is the main detoxification pathway for benzopyrene epoxides in the lung. This pathway may offer an explanation for the possible co-carcinogenicity of pesticides in combination with polycyclic hydrocarbons from exposure such as smoking (58).

Pesticide exposure is complex because many pesticides are mutagenic, teratogenic, or carcinogenic, whereas others are not. In this respect, it must be noted that extrapolation and generalization of the results is difficult due to the different pesticide formulations used and the complex combinations applied, depending on the region, crop, and season, etc. Formulations are complex and sometimes have confidential proprietary information. Formulated products may contain solvents, emulsifiers, carriers, and dispersants (15), for which their biological activity on humans has not been studied well. In addition, there are many possible methods of exposure, including ingestion, dermal, inhalation and ocular. Different exposure pathways can lead to variable amounts of pesticides in the human body and thus cause different biological effects. Furthermore, mixed or alternating use of pesticides in a season may also give rise to complications. These interactions can synergistically enhance the adverse effects of the chemical. Understanding of these interactions is complicated and not well studied. Information on the particular adverse effects of a defined compound is not enough to adequately evaluate the real genotoxic risk related to complex mixtures. Using higher doses of the chemical or increasing application frequencies in pest outbreak periods may also result in higher pesticide exposures. Using stable agrochemicals such as OCPs also increases human exposure risk through long-term maintenance in the environment as well as entering the food chain (1539). Some other confounding factors may also obscure links between pesticides and diseases. For example, although farmers are exposed to many pesticides, they also have a lot of physical exercise and sun exposure, two factors known to protect against cancers (6366). These phenomena may change the results and make interpretation of the results difficult.

A limitation of this study was the small number of subjects, and the inclusion of more people is recommended for future studies. Another limitation was the lack of sufficient non-smokers with HNCs, in whom factors other than smoking could be examined with greater certainty. Another shortcoming of the study was the inability to trace the quality of pesticides in adipose tissue. Monitoring of pesticides residue in the blood serum allows a wider range of pesticides to be traced and is recommended for future studies. Even providing blood samples from farmers in the fields may lead to better results for detecting unstable pesticides. The analysis of blood serum is recommended for future studies. Quantitative analysis of pesticide residue may also allow more definitive results using pesticide standards.

Conclusion

Previous studies have suggested that the causes of HNCs are multifactorial. The present study revealed an association between pesticide exposure and HNCs, especially larynx cancer, after controlling for confounders. Moreover, a dose-response effect was observed. The results also showed bioaccumulation of OCPs in the human adipose tissue with significant trends in patients suffering from cancer. Further studies are required to confirm whether or not exposure and bioaccumulation of pesticides is a significant determinant in HNCs. It seems the increasing awareness of farmers and pesticide users, particularly the increase in education, the availability of new and effective spraying equipment, and the introduction of PPE and safer pesticides, has decreased exposure risk and reduced related diseases. Finally, further studies using larger samples and different areas are recommended in order to achieve more conclusive results.

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr Mahmud Zarei and Mr Asghar Kanani for their technical assistance and help in GC analysis. We also thank Mr Farhad Frahoodi for English editing. The project was supported by the Neurology Research Center, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran (Grant No.10/13/9/1006).

References

1. Keyghobadi N, Rafiemanesh H, Mohammadian-Hafshejani A, et al. Epidemiology and trend of cancers in the province of Kerman: southeast of Iran. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2015;16:1409–13. [PubMed]
2. Döbróssy L. Epidemiology of head and neck cancer: magnitude of the problem. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2005;24:9–17. [PubMed]
3. Braakhuis BJ, Leemans CR, Visser O. Incidence and survival trends of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma in the Netherlands between 1989 and 2011. Oral Oncol. 2014;50:670–75. [PubMed]
4. Olshan AF. Epidemiology, pathogenesis, and prevention of Head and Neck Cancer. New York: 2010.
5. Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Dikshit R, et al. Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. Int J Cancer. 2015;136:E 359–86. [PubMed]
6. Casás-Selves M, DeGregori J. How cancer shapes evolution, and how evolution shapes cancer. Evolution. 2011;4:624–34. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
7. Maier H, Weidauer H, Zoller J, et al. Effect of chronic alcohol consumption on the morphology of the oral mucosa. Alcohol CIin Exp Res. 1994;18:387–9. [PubMed]
8. Dich J, Zahm SH, Hanberg A, Adami H-O. Pesticides and cancer. Cancer Causes Control. 1997;8:420–43. [PubMed]
9. Weichenthal S, Moase C, Chan P. A Review of Pesticide Exposure and Cancer Incidence in the agricultural health study cohort. Environ Health Perspect. 2010;118:1117–25. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
10. Alavanja MC, Ward MH, Reynolds P. Carcinogenicity of agricultural pesticides in adults and children. J Agromedicine. 2007;12:39–56. [PubMed]
11. Tarvainen L, Kyyrronen P, Kauppinen T, Pukkala E. Cancer of the mouth and pharynx, occupation and exposure to chemical agents in Finland [in 1971–95] Int J Cancer. 2008;123:653–9. [PubMed]
12. Govett G, Genuis SJ, Govett HE, Beesoon S. Chlorinated pesticides and cancer of the head and neck: a retrospective case series. Eur J Cancer. 2011;20:320–5. [PubMed]
13. Costa LG, Giordano G, Guizzetti M, Vitalone A. Neurotoxicity of pesticides: a brief review. Front Biosci. 2008;13:1240–9. [PubMed]
14. Robert JR, Karr CJ. Pesticide Exposure in Children; Technical report. Pediatrics. 2012;130:6.
15. Yu SJ. The toxicology and biochemistry of insecticides. 2nd ed. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2014.
16. Ministry of Jihad-e-Agriculture Iran (MOJA) Iran Agricultural Statistics. vol. 1. Crop year 2012-2013. Available from URL: http://www.maj.ir/portal/Home/Default.aspx?CategoryID=117564e0-507c-4565-9659-fbabfb4acb9b [accessed September 20, 2014]
17. Nourbakhsh S, Sahraian H, Soroush J, Rezaei V, Fotouhi AR. List of important plant pests, diseases, weeds and recommended pesticide. Karaj: Iran: Agricultural Education Publishing; 2012.
18. Kokouva M, Bitsolas N, Hadjigeorgiou GM, Rachiotis G, Papadoulis N, Hadjichristodoulou C. Pesticide exposure and lymphohaematopoietic cancers: a case-control study in an agricultural region (Larissa, Thessaly, Greece) BMC Public Health. 2011;11:5. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
19. Waliszewski SM, Quintana RV, Corona CA, et al. Comparison of organochlorine pesticide levels in human adipose tissue of inhabitants from Veracruz and Puebla, Mexico. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol. 2010;58:230–6. [PubMed]
20. Covacia A, Boer J, Ryan JK, Voorspoels S, Schepens P. Distribution of organobrominated and organochlorinated contaminants in Belgian human adipose tissue. Environ Res. 2002;88:210–18. [PubMed]
21. U.S. EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency) List of Chemicals Evaluated for Carcinogenic Potential. Availablefrom URL: http://www.epa.gov/pesticides/carlist/ [accessed 1 February 2015]
22. IARC (International Agency for Research on Cancer) IARC monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans. Available from URL: http://www.iarc.fr/en/publications/list/monographs [accessed January 18, 2015] [PubMed]
23. Woo Y-t, Lai DY, Mary F, Argus MF, Arcos JC. Carcinogenicity of organophosphorus pesticides/compounds: an analysis of their structure‐activity relationships. J Environ Sci Heal C. 1996;14:1–42.
24. Blasiak J, Jaloszynski P, Trzeciak A, Szyfter K. In vitro studies on the genotoxicity of the organophosphorus insecticide malathion and its two analogues. Mutat Res. 1999;445:275–83. [PubMed]
25. Kim HJ, Park YI, Dong MS. Effects of 2,4-D and DCP on the DHT-induced androgenic action in human prostate cancer cells. Toxicol Sci. 2005;88:52–9. [PubMed]
26. McKinlay R, Plant JA, Bell JNB, Voulvoulis N. Endocrine disrupting pesticides: implications for risk assessment. Environ Int. 2008;34:168–83. [PubMed]
27. Cabello G, Valenzuela M, Vilaxa A, et al. A rat mammary tumor model induced by the organophosphorus pesticides parathion and malathion, possibly through acetylcholinesterase inhibition. Environ Health Perspect. 2001;109:471–9. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
28. Isoda H, Talorete TPN, Han J, Oka S, Abe Y, Inamori Y. Effects of organophosphorous pesticides used in China on various mammalian cells. Environ Sci. 2005;12:9–19. [PubMed]
29. Tamura H, Yoshikawa H, Gaido KW, et al. Interaction of organophosphate pesticides and related compounds with the androgen receptor. Environ Health Perspect. 2003;111:545–52. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
30. Heinlein CA, Chang C. Androgen receptor in prostate cancer. Endocr Rev. 2004;25:276–308. [PubMed]
31. Birrell SN, Hall RE, Tilley WD. Role of the androgen receptor in human breast cancer. J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia. 1998;3:95–103. [PubMed]
32. Sandal S, Yilmaz B. Genotoxic effects of chlorpyrifos, cypermethrin, endosulfan and 2,4-D on human peripheral lymphocytes cultured rom smokers and nonsmokers. Environ Toxicol. 2011;26:433–42. [PubMed]
33. Amer SM, Aly FAE. Genotoxic effect of 2,4-dichlorophenoxy acetic acid and its metabolite 2,4-dichlorophenol in mouse. Mutat Res. 2001;494:1–12. [PubMed]
34. Padula G, Ponzinibbio MV, Picco S, Seoane A. Assessment of the adverse effects of the acaricide amitraz: in vitro evaluation of genotoxicity. Toxicol Mech Methods. 2012;22:657–61. [PubMed]
35. Radakovic M, Stevanovic J, Djelic N, et al. Evaluation of the DNA damaging effects of amitraz on human lymphocytes in the Comet assay. J Biosci. 2013;38:53–62. [PubMed]
36. Pool-Zobel BL, Leucht U. Induction of DNA damage by risk factors of colon cancer in human colon cells derived from biopsies. Mutat Res. 1997;375:105–15. [PubMed]
37. Liehr JG. Genotoxicity of the steroidal oestrogens oestrone and oestradiol: possible mechanism of uterine and mammary cancer development. Hum Reprod Update. 2001;7:273–81. [PubMed]
38. Dahmardeh BR, Esmaili Saria A, Bahramifar N, Ghasempouri SM. Organochlorine pesticide and polychlorinated biphenyl residues in human milk from the Southern Coast of Caspian Sea, Iran. Chemosphere. 2009;74:931–37. [PubMed]
39. Moosazadeh M, Khanjani N. Human contamination with organochlorine pesticides in Iran: A systematic review. J Health Develop. 2015;4:76–88.
40. Gobas FAPC, McCorquodale JR, Haffner GD. Intestinal absorption and biomagnification of organochlorines. Environ Toxicol Chem. 1993;12:567–76.
41. Bagga D, Anders KH, Wang HJ, Roberts E, Glaspy JA. Organochlorine pesticide content of breast adipose tissue from women with breast cancer and control subjects. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000;92:750–3. [PubMed]
42. Frigo DE, Tang Y, Beckman BS, et al. Mechanism of AP-1-mediated gene expression by select organochlorines through the p38 MAPK pathway. Carcinogenesis. 2004;25:249–61. [PubMed]
43. Payne J, Scholze M, Kortenkamp A. Mixtures of four organochlorines enhance human breast cancer cell proliferation. Environ Health Perspect. 2001;109:391–7. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
44. Rattenborg T. Inhibition of E2-induced expression of BRCA1 by persistent organochlorines. Breast Cancer Res. 2002;4:R12. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
45. Mathur V, Bhatnagar P, Sharma RG, Acharya V, Sexana R. Breast cancer incidence and exposure to pesticides among women originating from Jaipur. Environ Int. 2002;28:331–6. [PubMed]
46. Starek A. Estrogens and organochlorine xenoestrogens and breast cancer risk. Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2003;16:113–24. [PubMed]
47. Thongprakaisang S, Thiantanawat A, Rangkadilok N, Suriyo T, Satayavivad J. Glyphosate induces human breast cancer cells growth via estrogen receptors. Food Chem Toxicol. 2013;59:129–36. [PubMed]
48. Garry VV. Pesticides and children. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2004;198:152–63. [PubMed]
49. Anway MD, Cupp AS, Uzumcu M, Skinner MK. Epigenetic transgenerational actions of endocrine disruptors and male fertility. Science. 2005;308:1466–69. [PubMed]
50. Manson JM, Carr MC. Molecular epidemiology of hypospadias: review of genetic and environmental risk factors. Birth Defects Res. Part A CIin Mol Teratol. 2003:825–36. [PubMed]
51. Carozza SE, Li B, Elgethun K, Whitworth R. Risk of childhood cancers associated with residence in agriculturally intense areas in the United States. Environ Health Perspect. 2008;116:559–65. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
52. Santamaría-Ulloa C. The Impact of Pesticide Exposure on Breast Cancer Incidence. Evidence from Costa Rica. Población y Salud en Mesoamérica. 2009:17.
53. Wesseling C, Antich D, Hogsted C, Rodríguez AC, Ahlbom A. Geographical differences of cancer incidence in Costa Rica in relation to environmental and occupational pesticide exposure. Int J Epidemiol. 1999;28:365–74. [PubMed]
54. Van Maele-Fabry G, Willems JL. Prostate cancer among pesticide applicators: a meta-analysis. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2004;77:559–70. [PubMed]
55. Mills PK, Yang R. Breast cancer risk in Hispanic agricultural workers in California. Int J Occup Environ Health. 2005;11:123–31. [PubMed]
56. Goldsmith DD. Linking environmental cancer with occupational epidemiology research: the role of the international agency for research on cancer (IARC) J Environ Pathol Toxicol Oncol. 2000;19:171–175. [PubMed]
57. Koutros S, Mahajan R, Zheng T, et al. Dichlorvos exposure and human cancer risk: results from the agricultural health study. Cancer Causes Control. 2008;19:59–65. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
58. Lee WJ, Blair A, Hoppin JA, et al. Cancer incidence among pesticide applicators exposed to chlorpyrifos in the Agricultural Health Study. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004;96:1781–9. [PubMed]
59. Cocco P, Ward MH, Buiatti E. Occupational Risk Factors for Gastric Cancer: an Overview. Epidemiol Rev. 1996;18:218–35. [PubMed]
60. Gürdal SO, Saraçoğlu GV, Oran EŞ, Yankol Y, Soybir GR. The Effects of educational level on breast cancer awareness: a cross-sectional study in Turkey. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2012;13:295–300. [PubMed]
61. Alavanja MCR, Ross MK, Bonner MR. Increased cancer burden among pesticide applicators and others due to pesticide exposure. CA Cancer J CIin. 2013;63:120–42. [PubMed]
62. Issa Y, Sham'a FA, Nijem K, Bjertness E, Kristensen P. Pesticide use and opportunities of exposure among farmers and their families: cross-sectional studies 1998–2006 from Hebron governorate, occupied Palestinian territory. Environ Health. 2010;9:63. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
63. Aydin ZD. Sun exposure may confound physical activity–prostate cancer association. Arch Intern Med. 2005;165:2539–40. [PubMed]
64. Holick MF. Vitamin D and Sunlight: Strategies for Cancer Prevention and Other Health Benefits. CIin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2008;3:1548–54. [PubMed]
65. Wolin KY, Yan Y, Colditz GA. Physical activity and risk of colon adenoma: a meta-analysis. Br J Cancer. 2011;104:882–5. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
66. van der Rhee H, Coebergh JW, de Vries E. Is prevention of cancer by sun exposure more than just the effect of vitamin D? A systematic review of epidemiological studies. Eur J Cancer. 2013;49:1422–36. [PubMed]

Articles from Iranian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology are provided here courtesy of Mashhad University of Medical Sciences