Search tips
Search criteria 


Logo of ncommsLink to Publisher's site
Nat Commun. 2017; 8: 580.
Published online 2017 September 18. doi:  10.1038/s41467-017-00681-7
PMCID: PMC5603600

Electrically driven single-photon emission from an isolated single molecule


Electrically driven molecular light emitters are considered to be one of the promising candidates as single-photon sources. However, it is yet to be demonstrated that electrically driven single-photon emission can indeed be generated from an isolated single molecule notwithstanding fluorescence quenching and technical challenges. Here, we report such electrically driven single-photon emission from a well-defined single molecule located inside a precisely controlled nanocavity in a scanning tunneling microscope. The effective quenching suppression and nanocavity plasmonic enhancement allow us to achieve intense and stable single-molecule electroluminescence. Second-order photon correlation measurements reveal an evident photon antibunching dip with the single-photon purity down to g (2)(0) = 0.09, unambiguously confirming the single-photon emission nature of the single-molecule electroluminescence. Furthermore, we demonstrate an ultrahigh-density array of identical single-photon emitters.


Single-photon sources lie in the heart of quantum information technology1, 2, from quantum cryptography3, 4 to quantum computing5, 6. High-density single-photon emitters with well-defined source arrays hold the key for the construction of on-chip quantum devices7 and quantum networking8. Various single-emitter quantum systems, such as semiconductor quantum dots913, atoms1416, color centers1719, and molecules2025, have been investigated as potential single-photon sources. Among them, molecular emitters have attracted extensive attention because of their various merits such as sharp emission, a wide range of tunable photon energies, identical emission behavior, and high stability22, 26. Elegant progress has also been made on electrically driven molecule-based single-photon emitters by using dispersed molecules in organic light-emitting diode devices24. The single-photon measurements there were performed by selecting a random emitter among many others in a stochastically dispersed sample, making it difficult to control the emitter environment and to eliminate the background disturbance. By contrast, scanning tunneling microscope (STM)-induced luminescence (STML), a technique capable of going beyond atomic resolution imaging and manipulation, can use highly localized tunneling electrons to excite single-molecule electroluminescence2734, which is expected to be a single-photon source. Indeed, efforts have been made to probe the photon correlation for light generated in the tunnel junction by combining STML with the Hanbury Brown and Twiss (HBT) interferometry3538. Nevertheless, available reports are very limited due to strong quenching effect near metals, amounting to mainly the observation of a photon bunching phenomenon for molecules in solution37 and an antibunching behavior associated with the single-photon emission from local structural defects related to a small number of C60 molecules in the C60 thin films38. Consequently, the goal to achieve electrically driven single-photon emission from a well-defined single molecule remains to be reached.

In this work, by using a combined strategy of electronic decoupling by an ultrathin dielectric spacer and emission enhancement by resonant plasmonic nanocavity defined by the STM junction, we demonstrate electrically driven single-photon emission from a well-defined isolated single-molecule emitter. The correlation of such single-molecule single-photon emission with the local environment also provides new insights into the exciton decay dynamics near metals at the nanometer scale. We also demonstrate the construction of single-photon emitter arrays through STM manipulation by exploiting the merit that nearly all the zinc-phthalocyanine (ZnPc) molecules on a decoupling layer can produce molecule-specific emissions.


Single-molecule electroluminescence

Figure 1 shows the schematic of an isolated ZnPc molecular emitter electronically decoupled by a thin sodium chloride (NaCl) layer from the Ag(100) metal substrate. Silver (Ag) tips, with appropriately tuned plasmonic properties, were used to provide strong resonant plasmonic enhancement to the molecular fluorescence that is excited by highly localized tunneling electrons33, 39. As shown in Fig. 2, the NaCl spacer layer with a thickness of 2–5 monolayers (ML)40 is found to effectively suppress the fluorescence quenching and yield molecule-specific electroluminescence, as evidenced by the sharp emission peak around 1.9 eV that originates from the Q(0, 0) transition of the neutral ZnPc molecule33, 41. Such molecular electroluminescence could be observed for almost all isolated single molecules on the NaCl surface. Nevertheless, single-molecule electroluminescence intensities are found to vary for different NaCl thickness, revealing different quenching suppression effect. For molecules on 2 ML NaCl islands, molecular electroluminescence is still too weak to carry out photon correlation (or HBT) measurements because of relatively poor decoupling efficiency. On the other hand, for molecules on 5 ML NaCl islands with good decoupling, strong molecular electroluminescence could be obtained, but the stability for scanning over and exciting a molecule in STM becomes worse because of the thicker NaCl layer and resultant poorer conductivity. Therefore, in the following, we focus on the molecular systems adsorbed on 3 and 4 ML NaCl islands to systematically study their single-photon emission behaviors.

Fig. 1
Schematic diagram of STM-induced fluorescence from a single molecule. Molecular fluorescence is generated by the excitation of highly localized tunneling electrons over a single ZnPc molecule that is decoupled by NaCl layers from the Ag(100) substrate ...
Fig. 2
Single-molecule electroluminescence. ad STM images of single flat-lying ZnPc molecules adsorbed on 2, 3, 4, and 5 ML thick NaCl islands, respectively (2.5 V, 2 pA, 30 × 15 nm2). The number ...

Electrically driven single-molecule single-photon emission

A home-built HBT setup was used in the time correlation measurement of emitted photons from single ZnPc molecules excited by tunneling electrons in STM (Fig. 3). In order to make a comparable study on the photon correlation behavior of single ZnPc molecules on 3 and 4 ML NaCl islands, we carried out HBT measurements at different sample sites using the same tip (more specifically, the tip with the same plasmonic properties). Figure 4a shows two STML spectra acquired when the tip is positioned above the lobe of an isolated ZnPc molecule on 3 ML (blue) or 4 ML NaCl (red), showing about nine times stronger emission of the latter than the former. The nanocavity plasmonic emission on the bare 4 ML NaCl surface is also plotted (black), showing nearly resonant plasmonic mode with the molecular emission, though with a much weaker intensity. Results of photon correlation measurements for these three situations are given in Fig. 4b. An evident antibunching dip was observed in the second-order correlation function [g (2)(τ)] at time zero for molecular electroluminescence from a single ZnPc molecule absorbed on either 3 or 4 ML NaCl surface. As a comparison, no dip feature was observed in the time histogram of the HBT experiment for the emission from nanocavity plasmons when the tip is positioned above the bare 4 ML NaCl surface with a certain distance from any single ZnPc molecules (e.g., >4 nm).

Fig. 3
HBT setup for photon correlation measurements in STML experiments. The emitted light beam along one photon collection channel is split into two parts by a beam splitter. Two band-pass filters are set in front of two SPADs to selectively detect photons ...
Fig. 4
Electrically driven single-molecule single-photon emission. a STML spectra acquired at different sample sites using the same tip: ZnPc-lobe/4 ML NaCl, ZnPc-lobe/3 ML NaCl, and 4 ML NaCl, respectively (−2.5 V, 100 pA, ...

The observation of the antibunching dips suggests a single-photon emission behavior for the single-molecule electroluminescence. In order to evaluate the single-photon purity of the emission13, the experimental data of second-order correlation measurements were fitted with a single exponential function9, 18, 42 g(2)(τ) = 1 - [1 - g(2)(0)]e-∣τ∣∕τ0. The second-order correlation function at zero delay, g (2)(0), is found to be 0.12(2) for ZnPc on 4 ML NaCl and 0.41(4) for ZnPc on 3 ML NaCl, respectively. Both g (2)(0) values are below the threshold 0.5 and are thus a clear indication of single-photon emission19, 25. The corresponding time constants (τ 0) are 1.26(3) ns for ZnPc on 4 ML NaCl and 0.48(5) ns for ZnPc on 3 ML NaCl, respectively, which are on the same order of magnitude as that reported for defects in C60 thin films (~0.69 ns)38, but shorter than the lifetime of ZnPc molecules in ethanol (~4.1 ns)43.

The single-molecule electroluminescence is found not only highly stable during the long-time HBT measurements (hours), as illustrated by the nearly identical spectra in Fig. 4c for ZnPc on 4 ML NaCl (thanks to the ultrahigh vacuum and cryogenic environment), but also free of blinking at least at the millisecond scale (Fig. 4d). The average count rate detected by a single-photon avalanche diode (SPAD) detector is ~42 kHz at 100 pA, which corresponds to a quantum yield of ~3 × 10−3 photons per electron estimated by taking into account the photon collection and detection efficiency of our system (see Supplementary Note 1 for details). We would like to point out that, due to highly localized nature of tunneling electron excitations, we can ensure that in our case with isolated single molecules, only the specific molecule directly underneath the tip will be excited and produce molecular electroluminescence. Therefore, in this sense, we have successfully demonstrated strong and stable electrically driven single-photon emission from a well-defined isolated single molecule.

As shown in Fig. 4b, both the depth and width of the antibunching dip are correlated with the local environment around the single molecule. In other words, the single-photon emission behavior can be used to reveal the exciton decay dynamics of a single molecule near metals, specifically through the analysis of time constants (τ 0). The reciprocal of the time constant (1/τ 0) is defined as the so-called rise rate, which is generally considered to be the sum of the effective pumping rate and the decay rate of excited states (namely, excitons) in the two-level quantum system9, 10, 24, 42. In our experiment, the rise rate can also be understood as the sum of these two rates based on a three-state model18, 38 (see Supplementary Note 2 for details). For photon correlation measurements above a ZnPc molecule on 3 or 4 ML NaCl under the same current (100 pA, Fig. 4b), the pumping rate can be assumed to be constant. Therefore, the increase in the rise rate can be attributed to arise from the increase in the decay rate of the molecular excited states (i.e., the decrease in the excited-state lifetime). The significant shortening of the time constant from 1.26(3) ns for ZnPc on 4 ML NaCl spacer to 0.48(5) ns for ZnPc on 3 ML NaCl spacer corresponds to an increase in the rise rate and thus an increase in the exciton decay rate. Taking into account the dramatically reduced molecular fluorescence from ZnPc on 4 ML NaCl to ZnPc on 3 ML NaCl (Fig. 4a), such increase in the exciton decay rate can be ascribed to the rapid increase on the nonradiative decay rate of excitons to the metal substrate, resulting in shortened lifetime and stronger quenching, as expected qualitatively by the classical dipole theory44.

Tip‒molecule distance dependence of single-photon emission

In the situation described above, the change in the molecular fluorescence is attributed mainly to the variations in the decoupling effect of different thickness of NaCl spacer layers from the underneath metal substrate by assuming the influence of the STM tip to be constant. However, under tunneling conditions, the metallic tip is also very close to the molecule (<1 nm, as detailed in the estimation of tip‒molecule distances in Supplementary Note 3) and will also affect the photon-emission behavior and exciton decay dynamics. Such influence can be studied by varying the tip−molecule distance for a given thickness of NaCl spacer layers, as shown below through the change of tunneling currents (as well as in Supplementary Note 4 as a function of tip‒molecule distances).

Figure 5a shows the second-order correlation functions at different currents on the same ZnPc molecule adsorbed on 4 ML NaCl. The best single-photon purity achieved in the present experiments is down to 0.09 at a tunneling current of 40 pA. When the tunneling current increases, the antibunching dips are found to be narrowed, which reflects the decrease of the corresponding time constants, as shown in Fig. 5b. This observation is consistent with the common knowledge that the total decay rate would be increased when the metallic tip approaches closer to a molecule. Notably, as illustrated in Fig. 5c, the photon-emission intensities of molecular fluorescence normalized by tunneling currents (i.e., detected photon counts per electron) exhibit an increase when the STM tip approaches closer to the molecule (no saturation in emission intensity was observed up to 120 pA). (The de-excitation mechanism by the next tunneling electron proposed in ref. 38 could be thus excluded in our experiments.) Since the molecule is excited through electron injection by one-electron excitation process at −2.5 V (see Supplementary Note 5 for details), the excitation efficiency of the molecule per electron is expected to be essentially the same at different tunneling currents over 40–120 pA (unless such excitation efficiency could be significantly affected by wave-function overlaps at short distances). In this case, the increase of the normalized photon intensity in Fig. 5c implies that the quantum efficiency of the molecular fluorescence is enhanced when the distance between the metallic tip and the molecule decreases. Quantum efficiency is known to be determined by the ratio of the radiative decay rate over the total decay rate. Thus, the increase of quantum efficiency suggests a stronger enhancement for the radiative decay rate over the nonradiative decay rate at smaller tip−molecule distances even less than 1 nm (see Supplementary Note 4 for details), which is different from previous reports using photoluminescence technique45, 46. These results may provide new facts for future theoretical modeling on molecular fluorescence enhancements for molecules in close proximity to a metallic tip and substrate.

Fig. 5
Tip–molecule distance dependence of single-photon emission. a Second-order correlation functions measured above the same lobe of a single ZnPc molecule on 4 ML NaCl for different tunneling currents (40–120 pA) at a given ...

As expected for a stronger tip−molecule interaction at smaller distances, the molecular emission peaks are found to be further red-shifted and broadened (Fig. 5d), which is also qualitatively consistent with the decrease in the time constants observed (Fig. 5b). We would like to note that the photon antibunching dip in the g (2)(τ) curves acquired on single ZnPc molecules (Figs 4b, ,5a)5a) does not fall ideally to zero. This is probably due to either the presence of small background contribution from the nanocavity plasmonic emission in our optical measurements17, 18, 21, 23 or the temporal resolution limit of our HBT setup10, 11, 38, or both.

Artificially constructed single-photon emitter array

The ability to precisely position single-photon emitters in two-dimensional space is important for the integration of on-chip quantum devices and networks7, 8, 47. STM is capable of manipulating single molecules with sub-nanometer precision and allows us to demonstrate an example of constructing a single-photon emitter array at nanoscale. As shown in the bottom image of Fig. 6a, a square 3 × 3 molecular array with intermolecular spacing of ~4.4 nm was constructed by moving individual ZnPc molecules on 3 ML NaCl islands33 (see Supplementary Fig. 4 for details). The corresponding photon map measured simultaneously by a SPAD is illustrated in the top image of Fig. 6a, which exhibits similar emission intensity features for each individual ZnPc molecules. The spectral features, in terms of both emission peak position and intensity, are also nearly the same when acquired from the equivalent lobe positions of each individual ZnPc molecules in the array (Fig. 6b). Furthermore, as shown in Fig. 6c, the second-order correlation functions measured from each individual ZnPc molecules exhibit nearly identical antibunching features with the g (2)(0) values all below 0.5 (around 0.40–0.45). The nearly identical feature in the spectral and single-photon emission properties arises from the facts that all the ZnPc molecules are structurally identical and behave the same on the NaCl surface, which illustrates one of the advantages to use molecular single-photon emitters in optoelectronic integration.

Fig. 6
Artificially constructed single-photon emitter array. a Simultaneously acquired photon map (top) and STM image (bottom) of a 3 × 3 ZnPc molecular array on 3 ML NaCl through STM manipulation (−2.5 V, 50 pA, ...


In summary, we have presented a demonstration of both electrically driven single-photon emission from a well-defined isolated single molecule and further construction of single-photon emitter arrays. Such capability not only provides new insights into the photophysics of molecular emitters near metals at the nanometer scale, but also opens up new opportunities to explore and control electrically driven single-photon sources that are important for future quantum information processing and nano-optoelectronics.


Sample and tip preparation

Our experiments were performed with a custom low-temperature ultrahigh-vacuum STM (Unisoku) combined with optical detection systems at about 8 K under a base pressure of about 1 × 10−10 Torr. ZnPc molecules were thermally evaporated onto the Ag(100) substrate partially covered by NaCl islands at about 8 K (Ag(100) was previously cleaned by argon ion sputtering and annealing). Electrochemically etched Ag tips used in all our experiments were cleaned by electron-bombarding and argon-ion sputtering. STM imaging and spectral measurements were taken in a constant-current mode with the sample biased. The manipulation of ZnPc molecules was realized via pushing following the method described in our previous work33.

STML measurements

The schematic diagram of the photon collection and detection systems are shown in Fig. 3. Photons emitted from the STM junction were collected by two symmetrical channels. One collection channel is connected to a liquid-nitrogen-cooled charge-coupled device (CCD) spectrometer (Princeton Instruments) for STML spectral measurements33. The other channel is combined with a home-built HBT setup for the time correlation measurements of emitted photons. Photons are detected by thin-layer SPADs (Micro Photon Devices)48 with a 35 ps timing jitter to ensure a time resolution as good as possible. The time intervals between photons are analyzed using a time-correlated single-photon counting (TCSPC) system (PicoQuant PicoHarp 300) with 16 ps bin time. The dark count rate of the detector is below 25 Hz.

Data availability

Data available on request from the authors.

Electronic supplementary material


We thank Bing Wang, Chao-Yang Lu, Jian-Wei Pan, Brahim Lounis, and Vahid Sandoghdar for helpful discussions. This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China, the National Basic Research Program of China, and the Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences.

Author contributions

Author contributions

Z.C.D. and J.G.H. conceived and designed the experiments. L.Z., Y.J.Y., Yang. L., L.G.C., B.Y., F.F.K., and Y.Z. performed experiments and analyzed data. L.Z., Y.Z., Q.Z., G.C., Yi. L., J.L.Y., and Z.C.D. contributed to the data interpretation. L.Z., Y.Z., Q.Z., Yi L., Z.C.D., and J.G.H. co-wrote the manuscript. All authors discussed the results and commented on the manuscript.


Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.


Li Zhang and Yun-Jie Yu contributed equally to this work.

Electronic supplementary material

Supplementary Information accompanies this paper at doi:10.1038/s41467-017-00681-7.

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Contributor Information

Yang Zhang, nc.ude.ctsu@onangnayhz.

Zhen-Chao Dong, nc.ude.ctsu@gnodcz.

J. G. Hou, nc.ude.ctsu@uohgj.


1. Lounis B, Orrit M. Single-photon sources. Rep. Prog. Phys. 2005;68:1129–1179. doi: 10.1088/0034-4885/68/5/R04. [Cross Ref]
2. Aharonovich I, Englund D, Toth M. Solid-state single-photon emitters. Nat. Photon. 2016;10:631–641. doi: 10.1038/nphoton.2016.186. [Cross Ref]
3. Beveratos A, et al. Single photon quantum cryptography. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2002;89:187901. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.187901. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
4. Waks E, et al. Secure communication: quantum cryptography with a photon turnstile. Nature. 2002;420:762–762. doi: 10.1038/420762a. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
5. Kok P, et al. Linear optical quantum computing with photonic qubits. Rev. Mod. Phys. 2007;79:135–174. doi: 10.1103/RevModPhys.79.135. [Cross Ref]
6. O’Brien JL. Optical quantum computing. Science. 2007;318:1567–1570. doi: 10.1126/science.1142892. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
7. Yao PJ, Rao VSCM, Hughes S. On-chip single photon sources using planar photonic crystals and single quantum dots. Laser Photon. Rev. 2010;4:499–516. doi: 10.1002/lpor.200810081. [Cross Ref]
8. Kimble HJ. The quantum internet. Nature. 2008;453:1023–1030. doi: 10.1038/nature07127. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
9. Michler P, et al. Quantum correlation among photons from a single quantum dot at room temperature. Nature. 2000;406:968–970. doi: 10.1038/35023100. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
10. Lounis B, et al. Photon antibunching in single CdSe/ZnS quantum dot fluorescence. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2000;329:399–404. doi: 10.1016/S0009-2614(00)01042-3. [Cross Ref]
11. Yuan ZL, et al. Electrically driven single-photon source. Science. 2002;295:102–105. doi: 10.1126/science.1066790. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
12. Santori C, et al. Indistinguishable photons from a single-photon device. Nature. 2002;419:594–597. doi: 10.1038/nature01086. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
13. Ding X, et al. On-demand single photons with high extraction efficiency and near-unity indistinguishability from a resonantly driven quantum dot in a micropillar. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2016;116:020401. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.020401. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
14. Kimble HJ, Dagenais M, Mandel L. Photon antibunching in resonance fluorescence. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1977;39:691–695. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.39.691. [Cross Ref]
15. Kuhn A, Hennrich M, Rempe G. Deterministic single-photon source for distributed quantum networking. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2002;89:067901. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.067901. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
16. Barros HG, et al. Deterministic single-photon source from a single ion. New J. Phys. 2009;11:103004. doi: 10.1088/1367-2630/11/10/103004. [Cross Ref]
17. Brouri R, Beveratos A, Poizat J-P, Grangier P. Photon antibunching in the fluorescence of individual color centers in diamond. Opt. Lett. 2000;25:1294–1296. doi: 10.1364/OL.25.001294. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
18. Mizuochi N, et al. Electrically driven single-photon source at room temperature in diamond. Nat. Photon. 2012;6:299–303. doi: 10.1038/nphoton.2012.75. [Cross Ref]
19. Iwasaki T, et al. Germanium-vacancy single color centers in diamond. Sci. Rep. 2015;5:12882. doi: 10.1038/srep12882. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
20. Basché T, Moerner WE, Orrit M, Talon H. Photon antibunching in the fluorescence of a single dye molecule trapped in a solid. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1992;69:1516–1519. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.69.1516. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
21. Lounis B, Moerner WE. Single photons on demand from a single molecule at room temperature. Nature. 2000;407:491–493. doi: 10.1038/35035032. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
22. Kiraz A, et al. Indistinguishable photons from a single molecule. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2005;94:223602. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.223602. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
23. Lettow R, et al. Quantum interference of tunably indistinguishable photons from remote organic molecules. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2010;104:123605. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.123605. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
24. Nothaft M, et al. Electrically driven photon antibunching from a single molecule at room temperature. Nat. Commun. 2012;3:628. doi: 10.1038/ncomms1637. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
25. Rezus YLA, et al. Single-photon spectroscopy of a single molecule. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2012;108:093601. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.093601. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
26. Moerner WE. Single-photon sources based on single molecules in solids. New J. Phys. 2004;6:88. doi: 10.1088/1367-2630/6/1/088. [Cross Ref]
27. Qiu XH, Nazin GV, Ho W. Vibrationally resolved fluorescence excited with submolecular precision. Science. 2003;299:542–546. doi: 10.1126/science.1078675. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
28. Dong ZC, et al. Vibrationally resolved fluorescence from organic molecules near metal surfaces in a scanning tunneling microscope. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2004;92:086801. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.086801. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
29. Ćavar E, et al. Fluorescence and phosphorescence from individual C60 molecules excited by local electron tunneling. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2005;95:196102. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.196102. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
30. Dong ZC, et al. Generation of molecular hot electroluminescence by resonant nanocavity plasmons. Nat. Photon. 2010;4:50–54. doi: 10.1038/nphoton.2009.257. [Cross Ref]
31. Rossel F, Pivetta M, Schneider WD. Luminescence experiments on supported molecules with the scanning tunneling microscope. Surf. Sci. Rep. 2010;65:129–144. doi: 10.1016/j.surfrep.2010.06.001. [Cross Ref]
32. Chong MC, et al. Narrow-line single-molecule transducer between electronic circuits and surface plasmons. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2016;116:036802. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.036802. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
33. Zhang Y, et al. Visualizing coherent intermolecular dipole-dipole coupling in real space. Nature. 2016;531:623–627. doi: 10.1038/nature17428. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
34. Imada H, et al. Real-space investigation of energy transfer in heterogeneous molecular dimers. Nature. 2016;538:364–367. doi: 10.1038/nature19765. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
35. Hanbury Brown R, Twiss RQ. Correlation between photons in two coherent beams of light. Nature. 1956;177:27–29. doi: 10.1038/177027a0. [Cross Ref]
36. Silly F, Charra F. Time-autocorrelation in scanning-tunneling-microscope-induced photon emission from metallic surface. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2000;77:3648–3650. doi: 10.1063/1.1329631. [Cross Ref]
37. Perronet K, Schull G, Raimond P, Charra F. Single-molecule fluctuations in a tunnel junction: a study by scanning-tunnelling-microscopy-induced luminescence. Europhys. Lett. 2006;74:313–319. doi: 10.1209/epl/i2006-10008-x. [Cross Ref]
38. Merino P, et al. Exciton dynamics of C60-based single-photon emitters explored by Hanbury Brown-Twiss scanning tunnelling microscopy. Nat. Commun. 2015;6:8461. doi: 10.1038/ncomms9461. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
39. Zhang C, et al. Fabrication of silver tips for scanning tunneling microscope induced luminescence. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 2011;82:083101. doi: 10.1063/1.3617456. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
40. Ploigt, H. C. Ultra-Thin Dielectric Layers on Metal Substrates Studied by Scanning Tunneling Microscopy and Scanning Tunneling Spectroscopy. (Ph.D. thesis, Thèse École polytechnique fédérale de Lausanne EPFL, 2007).
41. Murray C, et al. Visible luminescence spectroscopy of free-base and zinc phthalocyanines isolated in cryogenic matrices. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2011;13:17543–17554. doi: 10.1039/c1cp22039j. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
42. Kitson SC, Jonsson P, Rarity JG, Tapster PR. Intensity fluctuation spectroscopy of small numbers of dye molecules in a microcavity. Phys. Rev. A. 1998;58:620–627. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.58.620. [Cross Ref]
43. Sibata MN, Tedesco AC, Marchetti JM. Photophysicals and photochemicals studies of zinc(II) phthalocyanine in long time circulation micelles for photodynamic therapy use. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 2004;23:131–138. doi: 10.1016/j.ejps.2004.06.004. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
44. Chance RR, Prock A, Silbey R. Molecular fluorescence and energy transfer near interfaces. Adv. Chem. Phys. 1978;37:1–65.
45. Anger P, Bharadwaj P, Novotny L. Enhancement and quenching of single-molecule fluorescence. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2006;96:113002. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.113002. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
46. Kuhn S, Hakanson U, Rogobete L, Sandoghdar V. Enhancement of single-molecule fluorescence using a gold nanoparticle as an optical nanoantenna. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2006;97:017402. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.017402. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
47. Wrachtrup J. Single photons at room temperature. Nat. Nanotech. 2016;11:7–8. doi: 10.1038/nnano.2015.265. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
48. Lacaita A, Ghioni M, Cova S. Double eitaxy improves single-photon avalanche-diode performance. Electron. Lett. 1989;25:841–843. doi: 10.1049/el:19890567. [Cross Ref]

Articles from Nature Communications are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group