PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of ncommsLink to Publisher's site
 
Nat Commun. 2017; 8: 571.
Published online 2017 September 18. doi:  10.1038/s41467-017-00628-y
PMCID: PMC5603566

The autophagy initiator ULK1 sensitizes AMPK to allosteric drugs

Abstract

AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) is a metabolic stress-sensing enzyme responsible for maintaining cellular energy homeostasis. Activation of AMPK by salicylate and the thienopyridone A-769662 is critically dependent on phosphorylation of Ser108 in the β1 regulatory subunit. Here, we show a possible role for Ser108 phosphorylation in cell cycle regulation and promotion of pro-survival pathways in response to energy stress. We identify the autophagy initiator Unc-51-like kinase 1 (ULK1) as a β1-Ser108 kinase in cells. Cellular β1-Ser108 phosphorylation by ULK1 was dependent on AMPK β-subunit myristoylation, metabolic stress associated with elevated AMP/ATP ratio, and the intrinsic energy sensing capacity of AMPK; features consistent with an AMP-induced myristoyl switch mechanism. We further demonstrate cellular AMPK signaling independent of activation loop Thr172 phosphorylation, providing potential insight into physiological roles for Ser108 phosphorylation. These findings uncover new mechanisms by which AMPK could potentially maintain cellular energy homeostasis independently of Thr172 phosphorylation.

Introduction

The evolutionarily conserved AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) is a key regulator of cellular and whole-body energy homeostasis that controls multiple branches of metabolism to redress energy imbalances caused by physiological and pathological processes1, 2. AMPK senses increased cellular AMP/ATP ratio during periods of energy stress (hypoxia, nutrient deprivation, exercise) and protects the cell from these events by switching off energy-consuming anabolic pathways and switching on catabolic pathways to restore ATP levels. Multiple physiological processes are regulated by AMPK including autophagy, appetite control, mitochondrial biogenesis and cell growth, and proliferation. Consequently, extensive efforts have been made to develop AMPK-activating drugs for potential therapeutic use in treating metabolic diseases (type 2 diabetes, obesity, cardiovascular disease) and also cancer and inflammatory diseases.

The AMPK αβγ heterotrimer comprises an α-catalytic subunit and regulatory β- and γ-subunits. Multiple isoforms of each subunit exist in mammals (α1/2, β1/2, γ1/2/3) and isoform-specific variations in tissue distribution, regulation, and function have been demonstrated. Both β-isoforms contain a carbohydrate-binding module (CBM) and are myristoylated at position Gly2, a modification that targets AMPK to intracellular membranes and is important for temporospatial regulation of AMPK signaling3, 4. γ-subunits possess three allosteric adenylate nucleotide-binding sites that bind ATP, ADP and AMP interchangeably, enabling AMPK to sense fluctuations in cellular energy state57.

In most instances, ligand-induced allosteric regulation of AMPK is governed by distinct phosphorylation events that either sensitize AMPK to nucleotides/drugs binding at γ-subunit sites (phosphorylation of Thr172 (pThr172) in the α-subunit activation loop810), or small compounds binding at the ADaM (allosteric drug and metabolism) site (phosphorylation of β-Ser108 (pSer108) in the β-CBM1113). An exception is synergistic activation of unphosphorylated AMPK when γ- and ADaM sites are occupied simultaneously10, 13. The ADaM site, a largely hydrophobic cavity formed between the α-kinase domain small lobe and β-subunit CBM, was identified in crystal structures of AMPK/drug complexes12, 14. These structures revealed that the phosphate group of pSer108 forms electrostatic interactions with α2-kinase domain residues Thr21, Lys31, and Lys33, thereby stabilizing the ADaM site and explaining the role of pSer108 in mediating drug sensitization. The precise mechanism by which ADaM site drugs activate AMPK is not fully understood. pSer108 is absolutely required for AMPK activation by A-76966211, 13, salicylate15 and MT47-10016, and increases by 40-fold potency of the high affinity drug 99112. Using purified enzyme we further demonstrated that activation loop phosphorylation is dispensable for AMPK stimulation by A-76966214. The well-defined character of the AMPK drug site, and its regulation through reversible phosphorylation, has led to speculation that synthetic activators (991, A-769662) and salicylate are mimicking an endogenous metabolite(s) that would be capable of sustaining AMPK signaling in the absence of pThr1721, 17.

Thr172 phosphorylation is considered a marker of AMPK activity; identification of upstream kinases, and the mechanisms underpinning pThr172 regulation, have been the subject of intense investigation over several decades. LKB1 and CaMKK2 (Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase kinase 2) have been identified as in vivo Thr172 kinases18. Despite some conflicting evidence, current models of AMPK regulation by adenine nucleotides describe a tripartite mechanism in which ATP exchange for AMP and ADP at γ-sites (i) promotes Thr172 phosphorylation, (ii) suppresses pThr172 dephosphorylation, and (iii) (for AMP) allosterically activates Thr172-phosphorylated AMPK3, 5, 6. Hierarchical phosphorylation events in the α-subunit Ser/Thr rich ST-loop (human α1(472–525)) have also been reported to negatively regulate pThr172, either by suppressing Thr172 phosphorylation (α-Ser487 auto-, Akt- or PKA-phosphorylation1, 2), or by promoting pThr172 dephosphorylation (α-Thr479 phosphorylation by GSK319). Activity of the autophagy initiator Unc-51-like kinase (ULK), itself an AMPK substrate, is associated with reduced pThr172 via an uncharacterized negative feedback loop20.

In contrast, regulation and function of β-Ser108 phosphorylation have been largely unexplored. Ser108 is highly conserved in eukaryotes and was identified as an autophosphorylation site in rat liver AMPK preparations21. Closer examination using kinase inactive (KI) AMPK expressed in COS-7 cells revealed that Ser108 is a cis-autophosphorylation site (dependent on intramolecular Thr172 phosphorylation) that is dephosphorylated following removal of the AMPK-activating stimulus. Thus, as for Thr172, Ser108 is largely unphosphorylated under basal conditions13. Identification of alternate upstream kinases for Ser108 would provide advances in two important areas: firstly, characterization of novel Ser108 kinases implicates their therapeutic modulation as a strategy to increase potency of AMPK-targeting drugs; secondly, feed-forward regulation by Ser108 kinases might denote the cellular processes under which concentrations of natural AMPK ligands become elevated. Here, we demonstrate that AMPK β1-Ser108 is a substrate for ULK1 under conditions associated with elevated AMP. We also provide unambiguous demonstration of AMPK signaling independently of Thr172 phosphorylation. These findings underpin a ULK-mediated “ligand switch” model of AMPK allosteric control, in which the adenylate charge-sensing role of β1-AMPK is replaced by an ability to detect perturbations in endogenous metabolite(s) acting at the ADaM site.

Results

β1-pSer108 confers cellular AMPK drug sensitivity

The importance of Ser108 phosphorylation in sensitizing AMPK to ADaM site ligands has been well-characterized using purified AMPK enzyme in vitro, but whether this translates to cellular AMPK signaling has not been unequivocally demonstrated. To exclude signaling from endogenous AMPK we generated an immortalized mouse embryonic fibroblast (iMEF) cell line derived from mouse embryos harboring genetic deletion of both β1 and β2 isoforms22 (β1/2-dKO). As expected, β1/2-dKO iMEFs were devoid of detectable AMPK α- or β-subunit expression and AMPK signaling as evidenced by lack of phosphorylation of the AMPK substrate ACC-Ser79 (Fig. 1a). Lentiviral-transduction of either FLAG-tagged wild-type (WT) or S108A mutant β1 in β1/2-dKO iMEFs reconstituted expression of AMP-sensitive AMPK heterotrimers, and recovered phenformin-sensitive AMPK signaling in transduced cells (Fig. 1a and Supplementary Fig. 1a, b). Incubation with the direct AMPK agonist A-769662 (20 μM) led to a significant increase (1.9-fold) in pACC-Ser79 in β1/2-dKO iMEFs-expressing WT β1, but not the β1 S108A mutant (Fig. 1b). A-769662-stimulation was mediated exclusively through the ADaM site, since phosphorylation of Thr172 was not increased at this dose (Supplementary Fig. 1c). These results confirm a requirement for Ser108 phosphorylation in drug activation of AMPK in cells.

Fig. 1
A-769662 activation of cellular AMPK signaling is dependent on β1-pSer108. a Reconstitution of basal AMPK signaling in AMPK β1/2 double knockout (β1/2-dKO) iMEFs by lentiviral transduction of AMPK β1 WT or S108A mutant. ...

Phosphoproteomic analysis hints at roles for β1-pSer108

To investigate the cellular fate of β1-Ser108 phosphorylation, we performed a stable isotope dimethyl labeled-based quantitative proteomic and phosphoproteomic analysis using β1/2-dKO iMEFs, transduced with either β1 mutant S108A or S108E (Fig. 2a). We previously showed that Glu at position 108 acts as an effective phosphomimetic, with regard sensitizing AMPK to activation by A-76966213. Following 1 h phenformin (2 mM) treatment, β1 S108A and S108E transduced iMEF lysates were compared to trace out the changes in proteome and phosphoproteome (Fig. 2b). Fifteen cellular phosphoproteins showed significant changes in phosphorylation between S108A and S108E-expressing cells in our study (Fig. 2c, Supplementary Table 1) with no detectable differences in AMPK expression or phenformin-induced Thr172 phosphorylation (Fig. 2a, Supplementary Fig. 2a). For example, we identified increased phosphorylation of p21-activated kinase 2 (PAK2) on Ser141/Ser152, located in the kinase inhibitory domain, in phenformin-treated iMEFs-expressing β1 S108E, whereas global proteome data showed no changes in PAK2 protein level (Supplementary Fig. 2b, c). Immunoblot analysis with a phosphospecific antibody confirmed significant increase in pPAK2-Ser141 in S108E-expressing cells, validating our representative phosphoproteome data (Fig. 2d). Collectively, pathway and network analysis using ingenuity pathway analysis (IPA) identified ‘‘Cell cycle, connective tissue development and function, cellular movement’’ as one of the top networks associated with these perturbed cellular phosphoproteins (Fig. 2e).

Fig. 2
Quantitative global and phosphoproteomic analysis uncovers cellular roles for β1-pSer108. a Representative immunoblots for β1/2-dKO iMEFs-expressing β1 mutants S108A or S108E, stimulated with 2 mM phenformin for 1 h. ...

β1-Ser108 can be phosphorylated in trans

We previously demonstrated that AMPK β1-Ser108 is cis-autophosphorylated via an intramolecular mechanism reliant on prior phosphorylation of α-Thr17213. This implies that, in the absence of alternate signaling, aberrant phosphatase regulation or conditions leading to trans-autophosphorylation, stoichiometries of pSer108 and pThr172 are intrinsically linked and, for the most part, equivalent. To interrogate this model we screened AMPK-activating conditions/agents under which Ser108 becomes a substrate for a trans-phosphorylation event in cells. To prevent background cis-signaling we expressed a GST-fusion of the KI AMPK mutant α1(D141A)β1γ1 in HEK293T cells. This complex is a suitable substrate for Thr172-phosphorylating kinases LKB1 and CaMKK2, but does not undergo Ser108 cis-autophosphorylation (Fig. 3a). Glucose starvation, or incubation with H2O2 or phenformin, each induced phosphorylation at Ser108 (Fig. 3b). Incubation with ionomycin (activator of CaMKK2 signaling), AICAR (5-aminoimidazole-4-carboxamide ribonucleotide) or A-769662, or amino-acid deprivation, each failed to elicit Ser108 phosphorylation at the single experimental time point used. We used α1/2-dKO iMEFs23 to exclude the possibility that Ser108 is trans-autophosphorylated in phenformin-treated cells. Lentiviral-transduction of α1/2-dKO iMEFs with FLAG-tagged WT- or KI-α1 reconstituted AMPK expression; as expected only WT α1 transduction recovered AMPK signaling (Fig. 3c). However, phenformin induced phosphorylation of Ser108 in α1/2-dKO iMEFs transduced with KI-α1, which was not increased by additional incubation with 100 μM A-769662 (Fig. 3d). Our results demonstrate that, under certain metabolic stress conditions, Ser108 is a substrate for a kinase(s) other than AMPK autophosphorylation.

Fig. 3
β1-Ser108 trans-phosphorylation occurs via an AMPK independent mechanism. a Rationale for employing kinase inactive (KI) AMPK to examine cellular Ser108 phosphorylation. β1-Ser108 phosphorylation (blue) can potentially be performed by ...

ULK1 phosphorylation of β1-Ser108 induces drug sensitivity

To identify upstream kinases for β1-Ser108 we screened a synthetic peptide corresponding to AMPK β1(102–114) (S108tide) (Fig. 4a) against a panel of 284 Ser/Thr kinases. 92% of the kinases screened yielded low activities against S108tide (<10% vs. top hit). Several kinases from diverse groups demonstrated comparable (>35%) specific activity relative to AMPK α1β1γ1, e.g., BRSK1/2, NEK2/9, TAOK1 (Supplementary Table 2). Among positive hits was ULK1, which is in accordance with identity of the sequence surrounding β1-Ser108 to the consensus motif for substrates of this kinase24, particularly Leu, Thr, and Arg directly N-terminal to Ser108 (positions P-3, P-2, and P-1, respectively) (Fig. 4a). We performed a more detailed analysis and phosphorylated the S108tide substrate using purified FLAG-ULK1, either alone (k cat/K m 1.23 × 10−2/s/μM) or complexed to interaction partners FIP200 and Atg13 (k cat/K m 1.86 × 10−3/s/μM) (Fig. 4b and Supplementary Fig. 3a). ULK2 demonstrated reduced efficiency in phosphorylating S108tide (k cat/K m 2.63 × 10−4/s/μM), compared to ULK1 (Fig. 4b). We examined ULK phosphorylation of the AMPK heterotrimer using purified KI-α1β1γ1 expressed in bacteria, since we previously found the WT complex extracted from this source is autophosphorylated at β1-Ser108 with ~ 60% stoichiometry despite lacking pThr17213. ULK1 phosphorylated β1-Ser108, but not α1-Thr172, in KI-AMPK, whereas we did not detect phosphorylation of either residue by ULK2 (Fig. 4c). MS/MS analysis confirmed ULK1-phosphorylation of Ser108 in KI-α1β1γ1 (Supplementary Fig. 3b, c).

Fig. 4
ULK1 phosphorylates β1-Ser108 in vitro. a Sequence alignment of the ULK consensus motif/favorable substitutions23 with human AMPK β1- and β2-residues 104–112 (Ser108 in lower case). x denotes positions with no demonstrated ...

We found that expression of the mutant α1(C176S)β1γ1 in bacteria produced AMPK that was devoid of pSer108 (Supplementary Fig. 3d) yet retained full allosteric regulatory mechanisms, such as A-769662/AMP and A-769662/C2 synergistic activation (Supplementary Fig. 3e)10, 13, or individual A-769662 (Supplementary Fig. 3f) and AMP (Supplementary Fig. 3g) activation following phosphorylation by CaMKK2. One explanation is that pThr172-independent basal activity, and hence Ser108 autophosphorylation, is induced by modification of Cys176 in the activation loop, occurring as a result of oxidative stress during AMPK expression in bacteria. Redox sensitive mechanisms are known to regulate receptor tyrosine kinases25 and a variety of Ser/Thr kinases including CaMK2, PKA and PKC2628. The α1(C176S)β1γ1 construct allowed us to investigate the effect of ULK phosphorylation on ligand-mediated regulation of AMPK without the need for prior and extensive phosphatase treatment. We found that ULK pre-treatment sensitized purified AMPK α1(C176S)β1γ1 to activation by A-769662 or salicylate (Fig. 4d). We detected ULK1-phosphorylation at several other AMPK α1, β1, and γ1 sites (Supplementary Fig. 3c). These included γ1 residues Ser261 and Ser270, located in proximity to nucleotide site 3, which is important for AMP allosteric regulation3, 7. However, AMP allosteric activation of WT α1β1γ1 was not significantly affected by pre-treatment with ULK1 (Supplementary Fig. 3g).

ULK1 phosphorylation of β-Ser108 is specific to AMPK β1

Ser108 is conserved between mammalian AMPK β-isoforms 1 and 2, however identity of the β2 sequence to the ULK consensus/favored motif is restricted to Leu at P-3 (Fig. 4a). ULK1 was previously shown to phosphorylate multiple AMPK β2 residues in vitro, but not Ser10820. To confirm β-isoform specificity of ULK1 we generated a phosphospecific antibody to β2-pSer108 (Supplementary Fig. 4). Incubation of WT α1β1γ1 or α1β2γ1 with CaMKK2 resulted in Thr172 phosphorylation and subsequent Ser108 autophosphorylation (Fig. 5a). ULK1 treatment of KI-α1β2γ1 resulted in reduced electrophoretic migration of β2, indicative of multiple phosphorylation events. However, we did not detect β2-pSer108 by immunoblot following ULK1 treatment (Fig. 5a, right panel). Furthermore, exposure of HEK293T cells to H2O2 failed to induce Ser108 phosphorylation in KI-α1β2γ1 (Fig. 5b, right panel).

Fig. 5
ULK1 phosphorylation of Ser108 is specific for the AMPK β1 isoform. a Immunoblots for β1-pSer108, β2-pSer108, and α-pThr172 in bacterial-expressed KI-α1β1γ1 (left) or KI-α1β2γ1 ...

β1-Ser108 is a cellular substrate for ULK

We examined whether ULK phosphorylates β1-Ser108 in HEK293T cells. Initially, we used the highly selective, ULK1 small molecule inhibitor SBI-0206965 (termed 6965)24. We found that pre-incubation of transfected HEK293T cells with 10 μM 6965, a concentration previously shown to have no effect on AMPK signaling24, significantly reduced H2O2- (Fig. 6a) and phenformin- (Fig. 6b) induced phosphorylation of Ser108 in KI-AMPK α1β1γ1, relative to 6965 untreated cells. Treatment with 6965 caused a significant increase in pThr172 in KI-α1β1γ1 in response to both H2O2 and phenformin (Fig. 6a, b); this is consistent with a role for ULK1 as a negative regulator of Thr172 phosphorylation.

Fig. 6
ULK phosphorylates β1-Ser108 in cells. Statistical analyses were performed using one-way ANOVA with post hoc Dunnett’s multiple comparison test, unless indicated. Immunoblots for β1-pSer108 and α-pThr172 in KI-α1β1γ1 ...

We investigated regulation of Ser108 phosphorylation in iMEFs in which both ULK1 and ULK2 had been genetically deleted (ulk1/2-dKO)29 (Supplementary Fig. 5). Under basal conditions, pSer108 in endogenous AMPK was significantly higher in both WT and ulk1/2-dKO iMEFs compared to HEK293T cells, despite no detectable increase in pThr172 (Fig. 6c). We bypassed this high basal signal in iMEFs by examining pSer108 in KI-AMPK, expressed by lentiviral transduction of a FLAG-tagged KI-α1(D141A) mutant and isolated with endogenous β- and γ-subunits by FLAG immunoprecipitation. KI-AMPK expressed in iMEFs was devoid of basal pSer108 (Fig. 6d). Phenformin-induced phosphorylation of Ser108 was significantly decreased (>90%) in KI-AMPK from ulk1/2-dKO iMEFs, compared to WT iMEFs (Fig. 6d). Combined, these results confirm β1-Ser108 as a cellular substrate for ULK1.

An AMP myristoyl switch triggers β1-Ser108 trans-phosphorylation

H2O2 and phenformin indirectly activate AMPK through perturbation of adenine nucleotide ratios (increased AMP/ATP ratio, reduced adenylate charge). We found that H2O2 and phenformin treatments of HEK293T cells that induced Ser108 phosphorylation (Fig. 3b) also produced significant falls in adenylate energy charge (AEC), with H2O2 incubation having the greater effect (AMP/ATP ratios: basal 0.0093 ± 0.0015; phenformin 0.0177 ± 0.0041; H2O2 0.0418 ± 0.0033) (Fig. 7a). Therefore, we investigated whether elevated AMP was a requirement for phosphorylation of Ser108 by ULK1. Phenformin treatment of HEK293T cells failed to induce Ser108 phosphorylation in KI-α1β1γ1 carrying a mutation in the γ1 nucleotide site 3 (γ1-D245A) that renders AMPK insensitive to stimulation by AMP3 (Fig. 7b). ULK1 can also be activated in response to small molecule mTOR inhibitors (AZD8055, INK128) that suppress mTOR-mediated phosphorylation at the ULK1 inhibitory site Ser75724. Incubation of HEK293T cells with 1 μM AZD8055 or INK128 induced almost complete loss of ULK-pSer757, without significantly affecting adenylate charge or stimulating phosphorylation of Ser108 in KI-α1β1γ1 expressed in these cells (Fig. 7a, c). These data indicate that ULK1 phosphorylation of β1-Ser108 in cells requires a reduction in adenylate charge and is dependent on the AMP-sensing abilities of AMPK.

Fig. 7
An AMP-myristoyl switch triggers ULK1 phosphorylation of β1-Ser108. a Adenine nucleotides extracted from HEK293T cells incubated with phenformin (2 mM, 1 h), H2O2 (1 mM, 45 min), AZD8055 (1 μM, 1 h), ...

N-terminal myristoylation of β-Gly2 plays important roles in AMPK temporospatial regulation, being required for AMP-stimulation of Thr172 phosphorylation by upstream kinases and metabolic stress-induced co-localization of AMPK to both upstream kinases and protein targets located at intracellular membranes3, 30, 31. We examined the requirement for β-myristoylation in directing Ser108 phosphorylation during cellular metabolic stress. We found that KI-α1β1γ1 containing a myristoylation-deficient β1-G2A mutant (non-myr) was insensitive to phenformin- or glucose starvation-induced phosphorylation of Ser108 in HEK293T cells (Fig. 7d). We examined the effect of β-myristoylation on cell-free ULK1-phosphorylation of Ser108 using myristoylated and non-myristoylated forms of KI-α1β1γ1. In contrast to our observation in cells, β-myristoylation resulted in significant suppression of ULK1-mediated Ser108 phosphorylation, which was not relieved by addition of AMP (Fig. 7e).

pThr172 is not absolutely required for AMPK signaling

To assess whether AMPK cellular signaling can be triggered independently of Thr172 phosphorylation, we expressed FLAG-tagged α2 WT or T172A mutant in α1/2-dKO iMEFs at similar levels (Fig. 8a). The T172A mutant possesses negligible basal and AMP-stimulated activities, but importantly can be sensitized to ADaM site metabolites/drugs through Ser108 phosphorylation13. In α1/2-dKO iMEFs-expressing WT α2, phenformin, but not A-769662, induced robust increases in pThr172 and pACC from a high basal level. In cells expressing α2(T172A), phenformin and A-769662, either alone or in combination, failed to induce Thr172 phosphorylation as expected. Phenformin, but not A-769662, induced a small increase in pACC from an undetectable basal level. Phenformin/A-769662 co-incubation resulted in a further 5.8-fold increase in pACC compared to phenformin alone, producing >30% the pACC signal in WT α2-expressing cells treated with phenformin (Fig. 8a). Neither of these effects on pACC were detected in α1/2-dKO iMEFs transduced with empty lentivirus (Supplementary Fig. 6), confirming that AMPK was the only kinase phosphorylating ACC-Ser79 under these conditions. A similar phosphorylation profile was seen for Ser108 in α2(T172A) cells, with phenformin inducing a small increase that was amplified in the additional presence of A-769662 (Fig. 8b). Phenformin/A-769662 co-incubation was the only condition that induced a detectable increase in ULK1-Ser555 phosphorylation, an AMPK substrate that is important for ULK1 activation32 (Fig. 8b).

Fig. 8
Cellular AMPK signaling occurs independently of α1-pThr172. Statistical analyses were performed using one-way ANOVA with post hoc Dunnett’s multiple comparison test. a Immunoblots for α2-pThr172 and pACC from α1/2-dKO iMEFs-expressing ...

Discussion

In this study, we demonstrate that β1-Ser108 in AMPK, a central co-ordinator of energy homeostasis, is a phosphorylation target for ULK1, a major regulator of autophagy initiation. Consequently, ULK1 sensitizes AMPK to A-769662 and salicylate, the active metabolic break-down product of acetylsalycilic acid (aspirin), independently of Thr172 phosphorylation (Fig. 4d). Salicylate stimulates fat utilization and reduces plasma fatty acids in vivo15, reduces de novo lipogenesis in human hepatocytes and MEFs33, 34, and reduces fatty acid and sterol synthesis in macrophages35. Daily aspirin prophylaxis is also associated with oncosuppression, an effect mirrored by the indirect AMPK activator metformin. Other β1-AMPK-specific direct activators MT63-7836 and the indole acid derivative PF-0640957737 have shown promise as treatments for either prostate cancer or diabetic neuropathy, respectively. Although not investigated, Ser108 phosphorylation is likely a requirement for AMPK activation by these compounds; MT63-78 shares common structural features with A-769662, whereas the crystal structure of PF-06409577 bound to the ADaM site contains the phosphomimetic residue Asp instead of Ser108. Our finding that ULK1 phosphorylates Ser108 is significant given the emergence of this modification as a vital mechanistic constant for AMPK drugs. Discovery of a mechanism that induces AMPK drug sensitization independently of autophosphorylation also provides a potential strategy to treat non-small-cell lung and cervical carcinomas, associated with genetic loss of LKB138.

Accumulated evidence now depicts the ADaM site as an “orphan” allosteric site for an unidentified endogenous AMPK ligand: (i) β1-Ser108 and contacting α-residues are highly conserved among eukaryotes; (ii) the β1-ADaM site is transient and regulated; (iii) both ULK1 phosphorylation of Ser108, and activation of AMPK by small molecule drugs, share a common specificity for the β1-isoform; (iv) synergistic activation of unphosphorylated AMPK, orchestrated across all three AMPK subunits and topographically distant β1-ADaM and γ-sites13, appears a highly intrinsic activation mechanism. Additionally, independent studies have described a disconnect between AMPK signaling (using elevated pACC as an index) and apparent AMPK activation (no increase in pThr172), most commonly in examinations of the role of skeletal muscle AMPK during exercise3942, but also in response to reactive oxygen species (HeLa cells)43 and berberine (LAMTOR1-KO MEFs)44. We now demonstrate that significant cellular AMPK signaling can be triggered independently of pThr172 (Fig. 8a), although we are unable to determine whether this arises exclusively by Ser108 phosphorylation, AMP/drug synergistic activation of unphosphorylated enzyme, or a combination of both.

Applying quantitative phosphoproteomics to investigate a physiological role for Ser108 phosphorylation, we identified significant differences in the phosphorylation profiles of several cell cycle-associated proteins in response to the phosphomimetic mutant β1-S108E (Fig. 2). Our approach was limited in that we do not know whether potential metabolite(s) acting at the S108E-stabilized ADaM site were elevated in response to phenformin, thus our findings are likely an underestimation of the global effects of Ser108 phosphorylation. It should also be emphasized that the differences reflect both primary and downstream phosphorylation events, so that the phosphosites detected encompass more than direct AMPK sites. None of these phosphorylated residues have been identified as direct AMPK substrates, however, both DOCK7_Ser452 and NHRF1_Ser285 are potential candidates based on consensus with the AMPK substrate recognition motif (Supplementary Table 1). β1-S108E expression induced a significant increase in downstream phosphorylation of the PAK2 regulatory domain residue Ser141, an event required for full kinase activity and subsequent induction of the cytostatic and anti-apoptotic functions of full-length PAK245, 46. Other downstream targets are associated with regulation of cell cycle arrest (Bin1; GO:0071156), p53-mediated cell cycle arrest (TB182; GO:0006977) and cell division (CND1; GO:0051301). Although functional roles for the majority of sites detected in our analysis are unknown, our findings with PAK2 in particular point to a role for β1-Ser108 phosphorylation in promoting energy stress-induced pro-survival pathways over cell death pathways. This model is consistent with other autophagy-inducing roles for AMPK, and Ser108-phosphorylation as a direct mechanism to activate AMPK by the autophagy initiator ULK1. Future studies will delineate the cellular signaling mechanisms specific to β1-Ser108 phosphorylation, and bridge the gap between AMPK and the other identified downstream substrates.

Closer examination of our results from MEFs expressing only α2(T172A) AMPK provides further insight into ULK regulation of β1-AMPK signaling (Fig. 8). An integrated model, involving positive and negative feedback loops, is shown in Fig. 9. AMPK signaling in these cells is hampered by insensitivity to AMP; consequently phenformin is unable to stimulate ULK1 activity, contributing to the weak pSer108 response (Fig. 8b). Further addition of A-769662 was sufficient to rescue AMPK activity and stimulate phosphorylation of ULK1-Ser555 and Ser108, potentially via positive feedback. cis-autophosphorylation of Ser108 in the α2(T172A) mutant is unlikely since activity of the unphosphorylated complex can only be achieved synergistically; in the AMP/drug-bound state Ser108 is presumably sequestered to the ADaM site and away from the AMPK active site. The close correlation between pACC, pSer108 and ULK-pSer555 profiles across all conditions provides support for a positive feedback mechanism between ULK and AMPK (Fig. 8a, b). Consistent with this, co-incubation of cells expressing only KI-AMPK with phenformin/A-769662 did not induce a further increase in pSer108, compared to phenformin treatment alone (Fig. 3d). Our model raises the intriguing prospect that, on ULK1-populated membranes (autophagosome, mitochondria), AMPK may be desensitized to AMP through suppression of α1-Thr172 phosphorylation, yet simultaneously sensitized to an alternate regulatory ligand through phosphorylation of β1-Ser108.

Fig. 9
An integrated model for ULK1 regulation of β1-AMPK signaling. The initial ULK stimulus (e.g., Ser555 phosphorylation) is provided by AMPK, activated itself in response to energy stress and elevated AMP:ATP. Once activated, ULK1 suppresses Thr172 ...

Initial attempts to examine trans-phosphorylation of Ser108 in cells were confounded by strong background autophosphorylation signals in HEK293T endogenous AMPK, and high basal levels of pSer108 in immortalized MEFs (Fig. 6c). The cause of elevated pSer108 in iMEFs is unknown. Since KI-AMPK was not phosphorylated on Ser108 under basal conditions (Fig. 3d) we expect loss of a pSer108 phosphatase activity, leading to accumulation of Ser108 autophosphorylation in endogenous AMPK, may be a contributing factor. We were able to exploit the intramolecular “limitation” of Ser108 cis-autophosphorylation by using KI-AMPK in cells to uncouple background autophosphorylation from input by alternate signaling pathways. We identified conditions (glucose starvation, H2O2 and phenformin) under which Ser108 is phosphorylated independently of AMPK activity (Fig. 3b). These conditions also increase cellular LC3-II or ULK1-pSer555, both standard markers for autophagic activity4749. Confirmation of ULK1-mediated phosphorylation of Ser108 in cells was provided by small molecule (Fig. 6a, b) or genetic (Fig. 6d) inhibition of ULK activity, each of which resulted in almost complete loss of stress-induced Ser108 trans-phosphorylation.

ULK1 phosphorylation of Ser108 is specific to the AMPK β1-isoform (Fig. 5); this is likely due to sequence heterogeneity proximal to Ser108 in the β2-isoform that diverges from the ULK consensus found in the corresponding β1 residues24. Interestingly, β1 residues C-terminal to Ser108 (His109-Phe112) are considered unfavorable for ULK substrates. However, Ser108 is located at the end of a β-hairpin loop structure12 and C-terminal residues may not participate in substrate recognition by ULK1. β1-Ser108 does not appear to be a favorable substrate for ULK2 (Fig. 4b, c), although we cannot rule out the possibility that the two ULK2 preparations used in this study may have possessed inherently low activity, given the current lack of knowledge regarding cellular regulation and bona fide substrates for this kinase. Overall, our findings are in agreement with autophagy network mapping showing interaction with AMPK β1 is restricted to ULK1, whereas ULK2 association is limited to AMPK β241. Further investigation is warranted to determine subsets of ULK1 and ULK2 downstream targets in vivo.

Our results here, and those of others, provide strong evidence for potentiation of Ser108 phosphorylation by an AMP-myristoyl switch mechanism, in which AMP-induced conformational changes lead to ejection of the β-subunit myristoyl group from an intramolecular-binding site3. The exposed myristoyl group promotes AMPK targeting to intracellular membranes and, in this case, ULK1 co-localization. Cell treatments that promote pSer108 independently of autophosphorylation (glucose starvation, H2O2 and phenformin) (Fig. 3b) are associated with increased AMP/ATP ratio, either through mitochondrial toxicity or disruption of ATP production50. Treatments that did not induce Ser108 phosphorylation activate AMPK independently of AMP (A-769662, AICAR, ionomycin, amino-acid deprivation), or activate ULK independently of changes in adenylate charge (mTOR inhibitors) (Fig. 7a, c). The AMPK myristoyl-switching effect of ZMP (the metabolized product of AICAR and an AMP mimetic) has not yet been examined. Additionally, removal of either the AMP-sensing ability of AMPK with γ1(D245A) mutation (Fig. 7b), or β-subunit myristoylation with β1(G2A) mutation (Fig. 7d), abrogated glucose starvation- and/or phenformin-induced Ser108 phosphorylation. β1(G2A) mutation was previously shown to suppress AMPK partitioning to intracellular membranes following glucose starvation3. ULK1 is also recruited to membrane structures during autophagy initiation, notably the autophagosome formation sites located near the ER51, and mitochondria52. ULK activity is associated with recruitment of other autophagy-associated proteins to the developing phagophore, including VPS34 and Beclin-1, both of which are phosphorylated by AMPK to achieve differential regulation of pro- and nonautophagy pathways53. Finally, β-myristoylation is strongly implicated in AMPK recruitment to LC3-containing puncta in the LKB1-deficient H23 human cancer cell line31. Collectively, these studies point to a close association of AMPK with ULK1 and the developing phagophore, and an important role for the exposed AMPK myristoyl group (myr switch ON) in targeting AMPK to phagophore membranes. A similar mechanism has been proposed to control AXIN-mediated AMPK recruitment to the late endosome/lysosome membrane for Thr172 phosphorylation and AMPK activation by LKB130. An unexpected finding was myristoyl-dependent suppression of Ser108 phosphorylation by ULK1 in cell-free assays (Fig. 7e), indicating that AMPK adopts a conformation in the myristoyl-buried state (myr switch OFF) that is unfavorable for ULK1 phosphorylation of Ser108. Repression of Ser108 phosphorylation was not alleviated by AMP; either this demonstrates a requirement for myristoyl-group membrane embedment, or an additional cellular component is required to derepress ULK phosphorylation through myristoyl group sequestration. These results may represent a protective mechanism to ensure Ser108 phosphorylation by ULK1 occurs exclusively at membrane surfaces.

In summary, we have identified an additional layer of communication between AMPK and ULK1, two major regulators of cellular energy homeostasis. ULK1 phosphorylation of Ser108, a post-translational modification important for AMPK drug action, may yield strategic opportunity to increase potency of AMPK-targeting therapeutics. Differential phosphorylation of AMPK at distinct cellular organelles/membranes raises the intriguing possibility of localized AMPK ligand sensitization. Myristoyl-switching is a consistent driving force for both mechanisms; whether secondary targeting signals are required to partition distinct AMPK complexes between organelles represents an area of great interest for the future.

Methods

Reagents

DNA oligos were from Sigma (Supplementary Table 3). Antibodies for pan AMPK α (#2793, clone F6, 1:1000 dilution), FLAG (#2368, 1:1000 dilution), myc (#2276, clone 9B11, 1:1000 dilution), HA (#2367, clone 6E2, 1:1000 dilution), PAK1/2/3 (#2604, 1:1000 dilution), ULK1 (#4773, clone R600, 1:1000 dilution) and tubulin (#3873, clone DM1A, 1:1000 dilution), and phosphospecific antibodies for AMPK α-pThr172 (#2535, clone 40H9, 1:1000 dilution), AMPK β1-pSer108 (#4181, 1:1000 dilution), ACC-pSer79 (#3661, 1:1000 dilution), PAK1/2-pSer144/Ser141 (#2606, 1:1000 dilution), ULK1-pSer555 (#5869, clone D1H4, 1:1000 dilution), and ULK1-pSer757 (#6888, 1:1000 dilution) were from Cell Signaling Technology. AMPK-β1 antibody (#ab58175, 1:1000 dilution), A-769662 (#ab120335) and AICAR were from Abcam. IRDye 680RD- or 800CW-labeled anti-immunoglobulin G antibodies (1:10,000 dilution) and IRDye 680RD-labeled streptavidin (1:20,000 dilution) were from LI-COR Biosciences. Glutathione Sepharose 4B and Streptavidin Sepharose high performance were from GE Life Sciences. FLAG synthetic peptide (DYKDDDK) was provided by GL Biochem (Shanghai). Other synthetic peptides were from Purar Chemicals. All peptides were purified by reversed-phase chromatography and stored as lyophilized powder. ULK2 recombinant protein was from Abcam. SBI-0206965, AZD8055 and INK128 were from ApexBio. FuGENE HD transfection reagent was from Promega Corporation. All other reagents were from Sigma.

Cell culture

COS7 and HEK293T cell lines were purchased from American Type Culture Collection. All cell lines were maintained in Dulbecco’s modified Essential medium (DMEM) containing 10% fetal bovine serum and antibiotics (penicillin, streptomycin) at 37 °C with 5% CO2. To generate iMEF cell lines, MEFs were extracted from WT or homozygous AMPK β1β2 null embryos (days 12–14 post-coitum), generated by crossing homozygous β1 and β2 null mice54. WT and AMPK β1/2 double knockout (β1/2-dKO) MEFs were immortalized by Fugene HD-mediated transfection with an SV40 large-T antigen expression construct. AMPK α1/2 double knockout (α1/2-dKO) and ULK1/2 double knockout (ulk1/2-dKO) iMEFs were described previously23, 29.

Protein expression constructs

All mutants were generated using QuikChange site-directed mutagenesis kits (Stratagene). All constructs were sequence verified. Mammalian cell expression constructs were gifts from Reuben Shaw (pcDNA3 mouse FLAG-ULK1 (Addgene #27636) and pcDNA3 mouse FLAG-ULK2 (Addgene #27637)), Noboru Mizushima (pME18s-3xHA-human FIP200 (Addgene #24303)) and Do-Hyung Kim (pRK5 human myc-Atg13 (Addgene #31965)). SV40 large-T antigen expression construct pBSSVD2005 was a gift from David Ron (Addgene plasmid #21826). Complementary DNA (cDNAs) for human AMPK α1 or α2 were generated with N-terminal FLAG-tag and cloned into pcDNA3 using XhoI/EcoRI (AMPK FLAG-α1) or XhoI/HindIII (AMPK FLAG-α2) restriction sites. Lentivirus expression constructs LeGO-iG2, second generation viral packaging vector psPax2 and ecotropic envelope vector pHCMV-EcoEnv were gifts from Carl Walkley (St Vincent’s Institute of Medical Research). cDNAs for human AMPK β1 (WT and mutants), α1 (WT and kinase inactive D141A mutant), and α2 (WT and T172A mutant) were generated with C-terminal FLAG-tag and cloned into LeGO-iG2 using BamHI/NotI (β1) or EcoRI/NotI (α1 and α2) restriction sites.

Protein expression and purification

Heterotrimeric human AMPK (α1β1γ1 and α1β2γ1 expressed as N-terminal His6-α fusions; WT or mutants as indicated) was expressed in E. coli strain Rosetta (DE3) and purified using nickel-Sepharose and size exclusion chromatography as described previously13. Heterotrimeric human AMPK (α1β1γ1 and α1β2γ1 expressed as an N-terminal GST-α fusion; WT or mutants as indicated) was expressed in HEK293T cells as described previously3. Briefly, HEK293T cells at 40% confluency were triply transfected with expression constructs for AMPK α-, β-, and γ-subunits, using transfection reagent FuGENE HD according to the manufacturer’s protocols. Cells were harvested 48 h post-transfection in ice cold lysis buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4), 150 mM NaCl, 50 mM NaF, 1 mM sodium pyrophosphate, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM EGTA, 1% (v/v) Triton X-100, protease inhibitors). Lysates were clarified by centrifugation at 14,000 rpm for 5 min and flash frozen in liquid N2 until processing. AMPK was purified on glutathione Sepharose 4B and eluted in 50 mM Tris-HCl, (pH 7.4), 100 mM NaCl, 10% glycerol supplemented with 20 mM glutathione. ULK1/2 and ULK1/FIP200/Atg13 complex was expressed by FuGENE HD transient transfection of HEK293T cells. Lysates were harvested after 48 h, clarified by centrifugation and ULK purified on anti-FLAG M2 affinity gel. ULK was eluted in 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4), 100 mM NaCl, 10% glycerol, 0.01% Tween-20 supplemented with 1 mg/ml FLAG peptide. CaMKK2 isoform 1 was produced in Sf21 insect cells as a C-terminal FLAG fusion as described previously3. Briefly, Sf21 cells were infected at a multiplicity of infection of 10 and harvested 72 h post-infection. Cell lysates were prepared as for recombinant AMPK, and protein was purified on anti-FLAG M2 affinity gel. CaMKK2 was eluted in 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4), 100 mM NaCl, 10% glycerol, 0.01% Tween-20 supplemented with 1 mg/ml FLAG peptide.

Lentiviral-mediated AMPK expression and purification

Ecotropic lentivirus was generated by transient transfection of HEK293T cells using calcium phosphate. Briefly, 1 day prior to transfection, 2–2.5 × 106 HEK293T cells were seeded per 10 cm culture dish. LeGO-iG2, psPax2 and pHCMV-EcoEnv plasmids (10 μg, 6.3 μg and 3.8 μg per 10 cm culture dish, respectively) were mixed together with 2 M CaCl2 solution (244 mM final concentration in 500 μl). The DNA/CaCl2 solution was added drop-wise, with vortexing, into 500 μl of 2xHEPES-buffered saline, pH 7.06. After 20 min incubation at RT, the mixture was transferred drop-wise onto HEK293T cell culture and incubated. Within 16 h of transfection, cell were washed with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and replaced with 6 ml fresh media. The lentivirus-containing supernatant was harvested after 48 and 72 h post-transfection and stored at −80 °C.

iMEFs were transduced in 6-well plates by spinoculation. Briefly, 1 day prior to transduction, 0.5 × 105 cells per well in a 6-well plate were seeded in 2 ml media. 200 μl lentivirus supernatant in the presence of 8 μg/ml polybrene in 2 ml media was spun for 98 min at 25 °C, 1100×g (Heraeus Megafuge 2.0 R). Lentivirus-containing media was replaced with an equal volume of fresh media after 24 h. Seventy-two hourspost-transduction, iMEFs were incubated with fresh media for 1 h and treated as indicated. Cells were harvested by washing with ice-cold PBS, followed by rapid lysis in situ using 100 μl ice-cold lysis buffer (50 mM Tris.HCl (pH 7.4), 150 mM NaCl, 50 mM NaF, 1 mM sodium pyrophosphate, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM EGTA, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 1% (v/v) Triton X-100 and protease inhibitors), and cellular debris was removed by centrifugation.

FLAG-tagged AMPK α1 or α2, and acetyl-CoA carboxylase (ACC), were isolated from iMEF cell lysates using anti-FLAG M2 affinity gel or Streptavidin Sepharose high performance, respectively. Immobilized ACC was washed extensively with buffer A and eluted in 2×sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) loading sample buffer for immunoblotting.

Kinase activity assays

ULK and AMPK activities were determined by phosphorylation of a synthetic peptide (S108tide: KLPLTRSHNNFVARRR, corresponding to AMPK β1(102–114) with three additional C-terminal Arg residues to promote binding to P81 phosphocellulose paper) using 200 μM [γ-32P]ATP and 5 mM MgCl2 in a 25 μl reaction volume at 30 °C. Reactions were terminated after 10 min by spotting 15 μl onto P81 phosphocellulose paper (Whatman) and washing in 1% phosphoric acid. Radioactivity was quantified by scintillation counting.

Kinase screen

Kinase screening (IKPT service) was performed by Kinexus, Canada. S108tide (100 μM) was screened against a panel of 284 selected Ser/Thr kinases with single replicate. Most assays were performed for 15 min duration, 50 μM [γ-33P]ATP, in a 25 μl reaction volume at 30 °C.

Generation of AMPK β2-pSer108 phosphospecific antibody

A phosphorylated synthetic peptide (CSTKIPLIKpSHNDFVAILD, corresponding to AMPK β2(100–117)) was coupled to keyhole limpet hemocyanin via the peptide N-terminal cysteine residue using the coupling reagent N-succinimidyl-3(-2-pyridyldithio)propionate. Rabbits were immunized with 2 mg of peptide conjugate initially in 50% (v/v) Freunds complete adjuvant and in 50% (v/v) Freunds incomplete adjuvant for subsequent immunizations. Rabbits were boosted fortnightly with 2 mg of peptide conjugate and bled 7 days after booster injections. The pSer108 antibody was then purified from serum by peptide affinity chromatography. Specificity for β2-pSer108 was evaluated by immunoblot against CaMKK2-phosphorylated AMPK α1β2γ1, and α1β1γ1.

Immunoblotting

Samples were electrophoresed by 12% SDS-PAGE and transferred to Immobilon FL polyvinylidine-flouride membrane (Millipore). The membrane was blocked with 2% nonfat dry milk in PBS +0.1% Tween 20 (PBS-T) for 1 h at room temperature. Membranes were incubated either overnight or for 1 h with 1° antibodies (diluted 1:500–1:2000 in PBS-T), prior to 30 min incubation with anti-rabbit or anti-mouse IgG 2° antibody fluorescently labeled with IR680 or IR800. Immunoreactive bands were visualized on an Odyssey membrane imaging system (LI-COR Biosciences) and densitometry analyses performed using integrated software. Uncropped western blot images associated with this study are presented in Supplementary Fig. 7.

Quantitative global and phosphoproteomic analysis

β1/2-dKO iMEFs, transduced with AMPK β1-S108A or β1-S108E, as described above, were incubated with 2 mM phenformin for 1 h. Treated lysates were acetone (−20 °C) precipitated and resuspended in 8 M urea/50 mM triethyl ammonium bicarbonate (TEAB) solution. Protein lysates were reduced with 10 mM tris(2-carboxyethyl)phosphine (TCEP) for 45 min at 37 °C, and alkylated with 55 mM iodoacetamide for 30 min at room temperature in the dark. Samples were diluted to 1 M urea in 25 mM TEAB and trypsin (1:60, w/w) digested overnight at 37 °C. Digested tryptic peptides were cleaned up using Oasis HLB (hydrophilic lipophilic balance) solid phase extraction (SPE) cartridges (Waters) and freeze-dried overnight. Resuspended tryptic digests were used for stable-isotope dimethyl labeling as described previously55. β1-S108A and β1-S108E derived tryptic peptides were used for light and medium labeling, respectively. Labeled peptides were mixed (1:1) and an aliquot (15 µl) was taken out and run on liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry (LC-MS)/MS for total proteome changes. Remaining mixed labeled peptides were SPE cleaned up and freeze-dried before used for TiO2 phosphopeptides enrichment. Phosphopeptide enrichment by TiO2 microcolumns was carried out as described previously56. Mixed labeled peptides and TiO2 enriched phosphopeptides were analyzed by LC-MS/MS using a Q-Exactive plus mass spectrometer (Thermo Scientific) fitted with nanoflow reversed-phase-high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) (Ultimate 3000 RSLC, Dionex). The nano-LC system was equipped with an Acclaim Pepmap nano-trap column (Dionex—C18, 100 Å, 75 μm × 2 cm) and an Acclaim Pepmap RSLC analytical column (Dionex—C18, 100 Å, 75 μm × 50 cm). Typically for each LC-MS/MS experiment, 5 μl of the peptide mix was loaded onto the enrichment (trap) column at an isocratic flow of 5 μl/min of 3% CH3CN containing 0.1% formic acid for 6 min before the enrichment column is switched in-line with the analytical column. The eluents used for the LC were 0.1% v/v formic acid (solvent A) and 100% CH3CN/0.1% formic acid v/v (solvent B). The gradient used was 3% B to 25% B for 23 min, 25% B to 40% B in 2 min, 40% B to 80% B in 2 min and maintained at 85% B for the final 2 min before equilibration for 9 min at 3% B prior to the next analysis. All spectra were acquired in positive mode with full scan MS spectra scanning from m/z 375–1400 at 70,000 resolution with AGC target of 3e6 with maximum accumulation time of 50 ms. Lockmass of 445.120024 was used. The 15 most intense peptide ions with charge states ≥2–5 were isolated with isolation window of 1.2 m/z and fragmented with normalized collision energy of 30 at 35,000 resolution with AGC target of 1e5 with maximum accumulation time of 120 ms. Underfill threshold was set to 2% for triggering of precursor for MS2. Dynamic exclusion was activated for 30 s. Mass spectrometric raw data were processed and analyzed using Proteome Discoverer 2.1 (Thermo Scientific) with Mascot search algorithm against mouse SwissProt database. Perseus 1.5.6.0 was used for further data analysis57. IPA software (QIAGEN Redwood City) was used for network and pathway analysis.

In-gel digestion of protein bands and mass spectrometry

SDS-PAGE protein bands were excised and simultaneously reduced and alkylated with 10 mM TCEP and 40 mM 2-choloracetamide for 1 h at room temperature. Proteins were digested with 13 ng/μl of sequencing grade trypsin (Promega) overnight at 37 °C and peptides desalted using in-house made microC18 columns (3 M empore). Peptides were resuspended in 0.1% formic acid, 5% acetonitrile and analyzed on a Dionex 3500RS nanoUHPLC coupled to an Orbitrap Fusion mass spectrometer with Tune v2.0.1258 in positive mode. Peptides were separated using an in-house packed 75 μm × 40 cm pulled column (1.9 μm particle size, C18AQ; Dr Maisch, Germany) with a gradient of 2–30% acetonitrile containing 0.1% FA over 60 min at 250 nl/min at 55 °C. An MS1 scan was acquired from 350–1550 (120,000 resolution, 5e5 AGC, 100 ms injection time) followed by MS/MS data-dependent acquisition with HCD and detection in the Orbitrap (60,000 resolution, 2e5 AGC, 120 ms injection time, 40 NCE, 2.0 m/z quadrupole isolation width) and, EThcD and detection in the orbitrap (60,000 resolution, 2e5 AGC, 120 ms injection time, calibrated charge-dependent ETD reaction times [2 + 121; 3 + 54; 4 + 30; 5 + 20; 6 + 13; 7 + ; 10 ms], 25 NCE for HCD supplemental activation, 2.0 m/z quadrupole isolation width). All raw data were analyzed with MaxQuant v1.5.3.2558 and searched against the human UniProt database with default settings including phosphorylation of S, T, and Y as a variable modification and match between runs enabled.

Nucleotide measurements

Adenine nucleotides from HEK293T perchlorate extracts were measured by LC-MS on an ABISCIEX 5500 QTRAP mass spectrometer16. AEC was calculated from ratios of [AMP], [ADP], and [ATP] (Equation 1):

AEC=ATP+0.5ADPATP+ADP+AMP
1

Statistical analysis

The data are presented as mean values ± s.e.m. of at least three independent experiments. The unpaired two-tailed Student’s t-test was used for all comparisons unless stated.

Data availability

The mass spectrometry proteomics data have been deposited to the ProteomeXchange Consortium via the PRIDE59 partner repository with the data set identifier PXD006365. The authors declare that all other data supporting the findings of this study are available within the paper and its Supplementary Information files, or are available from the authors upon reasonable request.

Electronic supplementary material

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by grants from the Australian Research Council (ARC) and the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC). G.R.S. is a Canada Research Chair in Metabolism and Obesity and the J. Bruce Duncan Chair in Metabolic Diseases. B.E.K. is an NHMRC Research Fellow. J.S.O. is an ARC Future Fellow. Supported in part by the Victorian Government’s Operational Infrastructure Support Program.

Author contributions

Author contributions

T.A.D., N.X.Y.L., and J.S.O. designed and coordinated the study. T.A.D., N.X.Y.L., J.W.S., A.H., B.L.P., K.R.W.N., M.T.O., and C.G.L. performed the experiments. S.G., M.K., and B.V. provided immortalized mouse embryonic fibroblasts. J.W.S., G.R.S., K.S., and B.E.K. provided intellectual input. All authors contributed to writing the manuscript.

Notes

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Footnotes

Toby A. Dite and Naomi X.Y. Ling contributed equally to this work.

Electronic supplementary material

Supplementary Information accompanies this paper at doi:10.1038/s41467-017-00628-y.

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

1. Hardie DG. AMPK - sensing energy while talking to other signaling pathways. Cell Metab. 2014;20:939–952. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2014.09.013. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
2. Steinberg GR, Kemp BE. AMPK in health and disease. Physiol. Rev. 2009;89:1025–1078. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00011.2008. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
3. Oakhill JS, et al. β-Subunit myristoylation is the gatekeeper for initiating metabolic stress sensing by AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2010;107:19237–19241. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1009705107. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
4. Houde VP, et al. Investigation of LKB1 Ser431 phosphorylation and Cys433 farnesylation using mouse knockin analysis reveals an unexpected role of prenylation in regulating AMPK activity. Biochem. J. 2014;15:41–56. doi: 10.1042/BJ20131324. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
5. Xiao B, et al. Structure of mammalian AMPK and its regulation by ADP. Nature. 2011;472:230–233. doi: 10.1038/nature09932. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
6. Oakhill JS, et al. AMPK is a direct adenylate charge-regulated protein kinase. Science. 2011;332:1433–1435. doi: 10.1126/science.1200094. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
7. Chen L, et al. AMP-activated protein kinase undergoes nucleotide-dependent conformational changes. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2012;19:716–718. doi: 10.1038/nsmb.2319. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
8. Hawley SA, et al. Characterization of the AMP-activated protein kinase kinase from rat liver and identification of threonine 172 as the major site at which it phosphorylates AMP-activated protein kinase. J. Biol. Chem. 1996;271:27879–27887. doi: 10.1074/jbc.271.44.27879. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
9. Scott JW, et al. CBS domains form energy-sensing modules whose binding of adenosine ligands is disrupted by disease mutations. J. Clin. Invest. 2004;113:274–284. doi: 10.1172/JCI19874. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
10. Langendorf CG, et al. Structural basis of allosteric and synergistic activation of AMPK by furan-2-phosphonic derivative C2 binding. Nat. Commun. 2016;7:10912. doi: 10.1038/ncomms10912. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
11. Sanders MJ, et al. Defining the mechanism of activation of AMP-activated protein kinase by the small molecule A-769662, a member of the thienopyridone family. J. Biol. Chem. 2007;282:32539–32548. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M706543200. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
12. Xiao B, et al. Structural basis of AMPK regulation by small molecule activators. Nat. Commun. 2013;4:3017. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
13. Scott JW, et al. Small molecule drug A-769662 and AMP synergistically activate naïve AMPK independent of upstream kinase signaling. Chem. Biol. 2014;21:619–627. doi: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2014.03.006. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
14. Calabrese MF, et al. Structural basis for AMPK activation: natural and synthetic ligands regulate kinase activity from opposite poles by different molecular mechanisms. Structure. 2014;22:1161–1172. doi: 10.1016/j.str.2014.06.009. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
15. Hawley SA, et al. The ancient drug salicylate directly activates AMP-activated protein kinase. Science. 2012;336:918–922. doi: 10.1126/science.1215327. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
16. Scott JW, et al. Inhibition of AMP-activated protein kinase at the allosteric drug-binding site promotes islet insulin release. Chem. Biol. 2015;22:705–711. doi: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2015.05.011. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
17. Scott JW, et al. Thienopyridone drugs are selective activators of AMP-activated protein kinase beta1-containing complexes. Chem. Biol. 2008;15:1220–1230. doi: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2008.10.005. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
18. Oakhill JS, Scott JW, Kemp BE. AMPK functions as an adenylate charge-regulated protein kinase. Trends Endocrinol. Metab. 2012;23:125–132. doi: 10.1016/j.tem.2011.12.006. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
19. Suzuki T, et al. Inhibition of AMPK catabolic action by GSK3. Mol. Cell. 2013;50:407–419. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2013.03.022. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
20. Löffler AS, et al. Ulk1-mediated phosphorylation of AMPK constitutes a negative regulatory feedback loop. Autophagy. 2011;7:696–706. doi: 10.4161/auto.7.7.15451. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
21. Mitchelhill KI, et al. Posttranslational modifications of the 5’-AMP-activated protein kinase β1 subunit. J. Biol. Chem. 1997;272:24475–24479. doi: 10.1074/jbc.272.39.24475. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
22. O’Neill HM, et al. AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) beta1beta2 muscle null mice reveal an essential role for AMPK in maintaining mitochondrial content and glucose uptake during exercise. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2011;108:16092–16097. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1105062108. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
23. Laderoute KR, et al. 5-AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) is induced by low-oxygen and glucose deprivation conditions found in solid-tumor microenvironments. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2016;26:5336–5347. doi: 10.1128/MCB.00166-06. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
24. Egan DF, et al. Small molecule inhibition of the autophagy kinase ULK1 and identification of ULK1 substrates. Mol. Cell. 2015;59:285–297. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2015.05.031. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
25. Truong TH, Carroll KS. Redox regulation of protein kinases. Crit. Rev. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2013;48:332–356. doi: 10.3109/10409238.2013.790873. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
26. Erickson JR, et al. A dynamic pathway for calcium-independent activation of CaMKII by methionine oxidation. Cell. 2008;133:462–474. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2008.02.048. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
27. Humphries KM, Deal MS, Taylor SS. Enhanced dephosphorylation of cAMP-dependent protein kinase by oxidation and thiol modification. J. Biol. Chem. 2005;280:2750–2758. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M410242200. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
28. Cosentino-Gomes D, Rocco-Machado N, Meyer-Fernandes JR. Cell signaling through protein kinase C oxidation and activation. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2012;13:10697–10721. doi: 10.3390/ijms130910697. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
29. Cheong H, Lindsten T, Wu J, Lu C, Thompson CB. Ammonia-induced autophagy is independent of ULK1/ULK2 kinases. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2011;108:11121–11126. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1107969108. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
30. Zhang Y-L, et al. AMP as a low-energy charge signal autonomously initiates assembly of AXIN-AMPK-LKB1 complex for AMPK activation. Cell Metab. 2013;18:546–555. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2013.09.005. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
31. Liang J, et al. Myristoylation confers noncanonical AMPK functions in autophagy selectivity and mitochondrial surveillance. Nat. Commun. 2015;6:7926. doi: 10.1038/ncomms8926. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
32. Egan DF, et al. Phosphorylation of ULK1 (hATG1) by AMP-activated protein kinase connects energy sensing to mitophagy. Science. 2011;331:456–461. doi: 10.1126/science.1196371. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
33. Ford RJ, et al. Metformin and salicylate synergistically activate liver AMPK, inhibit lipogenesis and improve insulin sensitivity. Biochem. J. 2015;468:125–132. doi: 10.1042/BJ20150125. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
34. O’Brien AJ, et al. Salicylate activates AMPK and synergizes with metformin to reduce the survival of prostate and lung cancer cells ex vivo through inhibition of de novo lipogenesis. Biochem. J. 2015;469:177–187. doi: 10.1042/BJ20150122. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
35. Fullerton MD, et al. Salicylate improves macrophage cholesterol homeostasis via activation of Ampk. J. Lipid Res. 2015;56:1025–1033. doi: 10.1194/jlr.M058875. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
36. Zadra G, et al. A novel direct activator of AMPK inhibits prostate cancer growth by blocking lipogenesis. EMBO Mol. Med. 2014;6:519–538. doi: 10.1002/emmm.201302734. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
37. Cameron KO, et al. Discovery and preclinical characterization of 6-chloro-5-[4-(1-hydroxycyclobutyl)phenyl]-1H-indole-3-carboxylic acid (PF-06409577), a direct activator of adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase (AMPK), for the potential treatment of diabetic nephropathy. J. Med. Chem. 2016;59:8068–8081. doi: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.6b00866. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
38. Shackleford DB, Shaw RJ. The LKB1-AMPK pathway: metabolism and growth control in tumour suppression. Nat. Rev. Cancer. 2009;9:563–575. doi: 10.1038/nrc2676. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
39. Wojtaszewski JF, et al. Dissociation of AMPK activity and ACCβ phosphorylation in human muscle during prolonged exercise. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2002;298:309–316. doi: 10.1016/S0006-291X(02)02465-8. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
40. Jørgensen SB, et al. Knockout of the alpha2 but not alpha1 5’-AMP-activated protein kinase isoform abolishes 5-aminoimidazole-4-carboxamide-1-beta-4-ribofuranoside but not contraction-induced glucose uptake in skeletal muscle. J. Biol. Chem. 2004;279:1070–1079. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M306205200. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
41. Dzamko N, et al. AMPK-independent pathways regulate skeletal muscle fatty acid oxidation. J. Physiol. 2008;586:5819–5831. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2008.159814. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
42. Schwalm C, et al. Activation of autophagy in human skeletal muscle is dependent on exercise intensity and AMPK activation. FASEB J. 2015;29:3515–3526. doi: 10.1096/fj.14-267187. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
43. Alexander A, et al. ATM signals to TSC2 in the cytoplasm to regulate mTORC1 in response to ROS. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2010;107:4153–4158. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0913860107. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
44. Zhang S-C, et al. The lysosomal v-ATPase-ragulator complex is a common activator for AMPK and mTORC1, acting as a switch between catabolism and anabolism. Cell Metab. 2014;20:526–540. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2014.06.014. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
45. Jung JH, Traugh JA. Regulation of the interaction of Pak2 with Cdc42 via autophosphorylation of serine 141. J. Biol. Chem. 2005;280:40025–40031. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M509075200. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
46. Jakobi R, Moertl E, Koeppel MA. p21-activated protein kinase gamma-PAK suppresses programmed cell death of BALB3T3 fibroblasts. J. Biol. Chem. 2001;276:16624–16634. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M007753200. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
47. Kundu M, et al. Ulk1 plays a critical role in the autophagic clearance of mitochondria and ribosomes during reticulocyte maturation. Blood. 2008;112:1493–1502. doi: 10.1182/blood-2008-02-137398. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
48. Mitter SK, et al. Dysregulated autophagy in the RPE is associated with increased susceptibility to oxidative stress and AMD. Autophagy. 2014;10:1989–2005. doi: 10.4161/auto.36184. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
49. Behrends C, Sowa ME, Gygi SP, Harper JW. Network organization of the human autophagy system. Nature. 2010;466:68–76. doi: 10.1038/nature09204. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
50. Hardie DG. AMPK: positive and negative regulation, and its role in whole-body energy homeostasis. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2015;33:1–7. doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2014.09.004. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
51. Russell RC, Yuan HX, Guan KL. Autophagy regulation by nutrient signaling. Cell Res. 2014;24:42–57. doi: 10.1038/cr.2013.166. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
52. Wu W, et al. ULK1 translocates to mitochondria and phosphorylates FUNDC1 to regulate mitophagy. EMBO Rep. 2014;15:566–575. doi: 10.1002/embr.201438501. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
53. Kim J, et al. Differential regulation of distinct Vps34 complexes by AMPK in nutrient stress and autophagy. Cell. 2013;152:290–303. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.12.016. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
54. Davies M, et al. Novel mechanisms of Na+ retention in obesity: phosphorylation of NKCC2 and regulation of SPAK/OSR1 by AMPK. Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol. 2014;307:F96–F106. doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.00524.2013. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
55. Boersema PJ, Raijmakers R, Lemeer S, Mohammed S, Heck AJ. Multiplex peptide stable isotope dimethyl labeling for quantitative proteomics. Nat. Protoc. 2009;4:484–494. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2009.21. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
56. Thingholm TE, Jorgensen TJ, Jensen ON, Larsen MR. Highly selective enrichment of phosphorylated peptides using titanium dioxide. Nat. Protoc. 2006;1:1929–1935. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2006.185. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
57. Tyanova S, et al. The Perseus computational platform for comprehensive analysis of (prote)omics data. Nat. Methods. 2016;13:731–740. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3901. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
58. Cox J, Mann M. MaxQuant enables high peptide identification rates, individualized p.p.b.-range mass accuracies and proteome-wide protein quantification. Nat. Biotechnol. 2008;26:1367–1372. doi: 10.1038/nbt.1511. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
59. Vizcaíno JA, et al. 2016 update of the PRIDE database and related tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44:D447–D456. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkv1145. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]

Articles from Nature Communications are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group