PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of frontmicrobioLink to Publisher's site
 
Front Microbiol. 2017; 8: 1742.
Published online 2017 September 11. doi:  10.3389/fmicb.2017.01742
PMCID: PMC5601980

Toward an Ecologically Optimized N:P Recovery from Wastewater by Microalgae

Abstract

Global stores of important resources such as phosphorus (P) are being rapidly depleted, while the excessive use of nutrients has led to the enrichment of surface waters worldwide. Ideally, nutrients would be recovered from wastewater, which will not only prevent eutrophication but also provide access to alternative nutrient stores. Current state-of-the-art wastewater treatment technologies are effective in removing these nutrients from wastewater, yet they can only recover P and often in an insufficient way. Microalgae, however, can effectively assimilate P and nitrogen (N), as well as other macro- and micronutrients, allowing these nutrients to be recovered into valuable products that can be used to close nutrient cycles (e.g., fertilizer, bioplastics, color dyes, and bulk chemicals). Here, we show that the green alga Chlorella sorokiniana is able to remove all inorganic N and P present in concentrated toilet wastewater (i.e., black water) with N:P ratios ranging between 15 and 26. However, the N and P uptake by the algae is imbalanced relative to the wastewater N:P stoichiometry, resulting in a rapid removal of P but relatively slower removal of N. Here, we discuss how ecological principles such as ecological stoichiometry and resource-ratio theory may help optimize N:P removal and allow for more effective recovery of N and P from black water.

Keywords: decentralized black water treatment, algal photobioreactor, nutrient removal, Chlorella, nitrogen, phosphorus

Introduction

Welcome to the world of tomorrow, where waste no longer exists. In this world waste is converted into resources that can be reused. Today, essential resources are being depleted, literally flushed down our toilets. Among the main examples is phosphorus (P), which is a major element in life for it is involved in energy transfer (ATP), cellular structures (phospholipids), and storage and transfer of genetic information (DNA/RNA) (Sterner and Elser, 2002). Human waste contributes to 68% of the total P present in domestic wastewater (Kujawa-Roeleveld and Zeeman, 2006). If we were able to recover that P, human excreta could supply 22% of the global P demand (Mihelcic et al., 2011). This is particularly important because global reserves of P are becoming increasingly scarce, expensive, and unevenly distributed, which will have important societal consequences (Elser and Bennett, 2011; Cordell and White, 2014). Human waste contains between 1.8 and 10 g P kg-1 (Roy, 2017), but also many valuable macro- and micronutrients. Recovery of these elements alongside P may improve fertilizer quality (de Graaff et al., 2011).

Current wastewater treatment plants can effectively remove nitrogen (N) and P from wastewater, therefore preventing the enrichment of surface waters with nutrients. Despite this removal, actual recovery of increasingly important resources, such as P, is practically non-existent. In the few cases that P is recovered, as for example by struvite precipitation, this is often inefficient (Hao et al., 2013; Egle et al., 2016). Microalgae can effectively assimilate P, but also N, and other macro-/micronutrients that are present in the wastewater, allowing these nutrients to be utilized for the production of valuable products such as biofuels, bioplastics, dyes, and bulk chemicals (Wijffels and Barbosa, 2010; Wijffels et al., 2010; Zeller et al., 2013; Suganya et al., 2016). Microalgae can also be used as an enriched fertilizer, as they include a wide range of micronutrients (Mg, Fe, Co, etc.). These micronutrients are often missing in commonly used artificial fertilizers, leading to nutrient depletion of agricultural soils (Udo de Haes et al., 2012). Moreover, microalgae fertilizer can improve soil structure and water retention capacity (Metting, 1990; Maurya et al., 2015).

Wastewater N:P ratios depend on the origin of the wastewater. Municipal wastewater, which includes domestic wastewater with minor contributions of industrial wastewater (common in industrialized countries), have N:P ratios of approximately 10 (Henze and Comeau, 2008). Wastewater with animal manure and human excreta can reach N:P ratios up to 40 (Kumar et al., 2010; Tuantet et al., 2013). In concentrated toilet wastewater (i.e., black water), the N:P ratio usually varies from 20 to 30 (Vasconcelos Fernandes et al., 2015). Earlier work has demonstrated how the microalga Chlorella sorokiniana can fully remove N and P from black water with 76 mmol NH4+ L-1 and 3.4 mmol An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is fmicb-08-01742-e001.jpg, yielding an N:P ratio of 22. All P was removed from the black water in 4 days, but another 8 days were needed for all N to be removed (Vasconcelos Fernandes et al., 2015). This may be due to the high N:P ratio of the black water, as well as due to a low N relative to P removal and recovery by the microalgae. Here, we first tested how black water N:P stoichiometry can affect N:P removal and recovery ratios by the green alga C. sorokiniana. Additionally, we highlight how microalgae may optimize nutrient removal from wastewater by applying the ecological principles of ecological stoichiometry (Sterner and Elser, 2002) and resource-ratio theory (Tilman, 1982).

Materials and Methods

Chlorella sorokiniana was cultivated in anaerobically treated black water (AnBW) with different initial N:P ratios (15, 17, 20, 23, and 26). The lower N:P ratios were achieved by addition of PO43-. AnBW was collected from an upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) reactor fed with vacuum collected black water and operated at 35°C and a hydraulic retention time of 8 days. AnBW was thermally pre-treated at 55°C for 4 days to eliminate the interference of bacteria on C, N, and P uptake. The inoculum density of the experimental cultures was 0.5 g dry weight L-1. The experiment was performed in 400 mL flat panel photobioreactors (PBRs) with a light path of 14 mm. The PBRs were illuminated with a maximum incident light intensity of 1,500 μmol photons m-2 s-1, an average in situ light intensity of 945 μmol photons m-2 s-1, and a light:dark cycle of 16 h:8 h. Temperature was set at 37°C and controlled by a water jacket placed between the light source and bioreactor. The pH was kept at 6.8 ± 0.1 by automated acid/base additions to prevent the conversion of ammonium ions (NH4+) to gaseous ammonia (NH3), which is harmful to green microalgae (Abeliovich, 2005). The culture was mixed by aeration with compressed air (enriched with 10% CO2) at a flow of 400 mL min-1. Daily samples were analyzed for biomass and dissolved inorganic nutrients. Particulate C, N, and P were assessed at day 4 and at the end of each treatment (between days 9 and 18). Biomass was determined by dry weight. NH4+ and PO43- were analyzed by a Seal QuAAtro Auto Analyzer (Seal Analytical Inc., Netherlands). Particulate N and C were measured on a FLASH 2000 NC Elemental Analyzer (Brechbuhler Incorporated, Interscience B.V., Netherlands). Particulate P was first combusted at 550°C for 30 min, then digested with persulfate (2.5%) at 121°C for 30 min, and subsequently analyzed on the Seal QuAAtro Auto Analyzer. The ratio at which N and P were removed from the black water was calculated from the linear relation between dissolved inorganic N and P concentrations over the first 4 days of the experiment.

Results and Discussion

Algal biomass increased similarly in the different black water N:P ratio treatments, reaching stationary phase in about 10 days (Figure Figure1A1A). Almost all dissolved inorganic N and P were removed via algal assimilation, showing similar dynamics irrespective of initial wastewater N:P ratios, with full removal of P within 4 days and subsequent removal of remaining N in another 5–10 days (Figure Figure1B1B and Supplementary Figure 1). The N:P removal ratio, i.e., the ratio at which N and P were removed from the black water, was about 13 during the first 4 days of each treatment (i.e., the P replete phase), and lower than the initial black water N:P (Figure Figure1C1C). The N:P recovery, i.e., the cellular N:P of Chlorella, largely followed the N:P removal during the initial 4 days (see circles in Figure Figure1D1D). During the subsequent P deplete phase, algae continued to grow for another 3–6 days, which lead to increased N:P ratios at the end of each treatment compared to day 4 (compare triangles to circles in Figure Figure1D1D). An increase in cellular N:P as well as C:P ratios upon P limitation is commonly observed in phytoplankton (Klausmeier et al., 2004a; Hillebrand et al., 2013), and is caused by a continued uptake and assimilation of N and C after P is limited (Sterner and Elser, 2002; Supplementary Figure 2).

FIGURE 1
Dynamics of biomass (A), dissolved inorganic nitrogen (DIN) and phosphorus (DIP) (B), N:P removal (C), and N:P recovery (D) by Chlorella sorokiniana at different initial black water N:P ratios (green shades, darker colors represent higher N:P). Symbols ...

Our results show that both the initial N:P removal and N:P recovery ratio are independent of the initial black water N:P ratios, and demonstrate further cellular uptake and removal of N after P has been depleted from the medium. Overall, the observed biomass increase and nutrient removal from black water were very effective, with a final mean biomass yield of 12 g dry weight L-1 (Figure Figure1A1A), final mean biomass C:N:P ratio of 125:14:1, and mean biomass yield per light photon of 0.20 g dry weight (mol photon)-1. The recovery efficiencies of N and P from the black water by algal assimilation were 75 and 100%, respectively. The lower recovery of N is presumably due to volatilization of N as NH3 and N2O (Fagerstone et al., 2011; Mezzari et al., 2013) and release of dissolved organic nitrogen compounds by the microalgae (Sipler and Bronk, 2015). Thus, all P and most of the N from the wastewater were converted into algal biomass.

The average nutrient removal rates over the period of P-sufficiency to P-depletion (i.e., day 0 to day 4) were 7.6 mmol N L-1 d-1 and 0.9 mmol P L-1 d-1, respectively. Compared to an earlier study with continuous light, the observed yield of biomass on light, N removal rates, and P removal rates increased by about 25, 34, and 81%, respectively. This suggests that despite the high microalgal biomass and associated self-shading, the availability of light was not limiting and a shorter light:dark cycle even promoted a higher biomass yield on light. These findings support the application of microalgae for wastewater treatment using natural light with day:night cycling. The delayed removal of N relative to P, however, imposes a great challenge to the application of microalgae for treatment of wastewater with high N:P ratios. For instance, on a small-scale decentralized black water treatment system for ~250 people where only 1 L of flush water is used, a 5-day delayed N removal is associated with a black water accumulation of 2–10 m3 for each treatment cycle (depending on toilet usage – office or household). In practical terms, such a delay would lead to the need of a large AnBW storage capacity, which adds complexity to the treatment system. Thus, higher N:P removal and consequently N:P recovery ratios are essential for a more effective use of microalgae in wastewater treatment.

Previous studies have shown how ecological approaches (e.g., complementarity in resource use) may support industrial scale biomass, crop, and diesel production (Smith et al., 2010; Stockenreiter et al., 2012; Shurin et al., 2013). Comparable principles will apply to the removal and recovery of nutrients from wastewater. The rate at which nutrients can be removed and recovered from the wastewater is directly associated to key physiological traits of alga species, such as growth rate and nutrient demands. Higher growth rates are generally associated with higher nutrient uptake rates, and thereby result in faster removal of nutrients from wastewater. Yet, algal species with high growth rates may also have higher P demands, and thereby lower N:P ratios (Geider and LaRoche, 2002; but see Flynn et al., 2010). Thus, although selection of single species with higher growth rates may enhance the overall removal rate of nutrients, it may not enhance the N:P removal ratio. On the other hand, selection of a single species with N:P uptake ratios resembling the N:P of the wastewater may accelerate the combined removal of N and P (Figure Figure2A2A). In our study, the cellular microalgal N:P ratio was 13 during the P replete phase of the experiment, which was lower compared to the black water. Phytoplankton species with higher optimal N:P ratios [i.e., N:P ratios under nutrient sufficient maximum growth rates (Klausmeier et al., 2004b)] should lead to higher N:P removal ratios and overall N removal rates. The black water N:P ratios are at the higher end of reported optimal phytoplankton N:P ratios (Geider and LaRoche, 2002), and are found in some species of cyanobacteria and green algae (Hillebrand et al., 2013). Thus, further screening of particularly these groups may provide the best chances at finding species with N:P ratios resembling that of black water and thus optimizing N:P removal and recovery from wastewater (Figure Figure2A2A).

FIGURE 2
Schematic representation of current N and P removal with Chlorella (A) and expected removal with multiple species in a continuous culture system (B), where horizontal and vertical lines indicate zero net growth isoclines or R* values, with colors ...

Besides optimized N:P removal by selection of a single species, enhanced N:P removal and N:P recovery ratios could also be achieved using phytoplankton communities, where each species has a complementary N:P uptake ratio. In competition for two nutrients at steady state in a continuous culture system (e.g., a chemostat), trade-offs may lead to stable coexistence of two species, where both resources are depleted to the minimum requirements of either species (Tilman, 1982). This minimum required is indicated by R*, and gives the amount of a resource where growth and losses are balanced (i.e., zero-net-growth-isoclines, Figure Figure2B2B). Thus, growth will be positive (biomass will increase) at concentrations above the R* value, while growth will be negative (biomass will decrease) at concentrations below R*. The R* for a nutrient will generally be lower for species with a high affinity (i.e., a low half-saturation constant K1/2) and high uptake rate for a particular nutrient (Litchman et al., 2007). For instance, if one species has a high affinity and uptake rate for N, it will likely have a low R* for N as well, and will be a better competitor for N. A trade-off between competitive abilities for N and P between different species may facilitate coexistence at intermediate nutrient supply ratios, where neither species can competitively exclude the other (Figure Figure2B2B).

The chance for coexistence, and thereby optimized removal of both N and P, will increase with the number of species exhibiting trade-offs between the competitive abilities for N and P. Indeed, although mixtures of multiple algal species showed differential effects on algal production (Schmidtke et al., 2010; Shurin et al., 2013, 2014), enhanced diversity did show reduced residual concentrations of nutrients in various systems (Cardinale et al., 2006; Shurin et al., 2013) and may support higher nutrient use efficiencies (Ptacnik et al., 2008), and overall nutrient uptake rates (Cardinale, 2011). Thus, an enhanced functional trait diversity in algal mixtures, and thereby a higher complementarity in nutrient use, may favor the increased removal of nutrients compared to single algal cultures.

Mixtures of species with complementary light harvesting strategies may allow a more effective use of the light spectrum. For instance, green and red cyanobacterial species were shown to coexist in white-light (Stomp et al., 2004). Thus, co-culturing of distinct green algae and cyanobacteria together with red algal species (e.g., Haematococcus) would likely enhance the N:P removal and N:P recovery ratio, and further increase the biomass yield from wastewater. Moreover, a higher algal diversity may enhance the resilience of a system against variations in growth conditions, top-down control, and pathogen infections (Shurin et al., 2013).

Application of ecological principles for technological microalgal application is still in its infancy, particularly for wastewater treatment. Here, we highlighted how our understanding of trade-offs and complementarity in resource acquisition and demands may support optimized N:P removal ratios and ultimately greater recovery of nutrients from wastewater. Connecting wastewater nutrient reuse to product cycles will support a more sustainable future, where a full understanding of phytoplankton eco-physiology provides an overarching guide to effective nutrient removal, recovery, and the production of valuable algal biomass-based products from wastewater.

Author Contributions

TF, MS-M, and DW did the conception of the work; LT and PV performed the experimental work; TF supervised the experimental work; TF and DW wrote a first draft of the manuscript, which was revised by all co-authors.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

We thank Nico Helmsing and Suzanne Wiezer for the technical support. We are grateful to Ted Harris for his comments on the manuscript.

Footnotes

Funding. This work was funded by NWO (Netherlands) and FAPESP (Brazil) Joint Research Projects Biobased Economy, project “Recovering nutrients and carbon from concentrated black water” (project number 729.004.004).

Supplementary Material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fmicb.2017.01742/full#supplementary-material

References

  • Abeliovich A. (2005). Handbook of Microalgal Culture, Biotechnology and Applied Phycology. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
  • Cardinale B. J. (2011). Biodiversity improves water quality through niche partitioning. Nature 472 86–89. 10.1038/nature09904 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Cardinale B. J., Srivastava D. S., Emmett Duffy J., Wright J. P., Downing A. L., Sankaran M., et al. (2006). Effects of biodiversity on the functioning of trophic groups and ecosystems. Nature 443 989–992. 10.1038/nature05202 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Cordell D., White S. (2014). Life’s bottleneck: sustaining the world’s phosphorus for a food secure future. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 39 161–188. 10.1146/annurev-environ-010213-113300 [Cross Ref]
  • de Graaff M. S., Temmink H., Zeeman G., Buisman C. J. N. (2011). Energy and phosphorus recovery from black water. Water Sci. Technol. 63 2759–2765. 10.2166/wst.2011.558 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Egle L., Rechberger H., Krampe J., Zessner M. (2016). Phosphorus recovery from municipal wastewater: an integrated comparative technological, environmental and economic assessment of P recovery technologies. Sci. Total Environ. 571 522–542. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.07.019 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Elser J., Bennett E. (2011). Phosphorus cycle: a broken biogeochemical cycle. Nature 478 29–31. 10.1038/478029a [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Fagerstone K. D., Quinn J. C., Bradley T. H., De Long S. K., Marchese A. J. (2011). Quantitative measurement of direct nitrous oxide emissions from microalgae cultivation. Environ. Sci. Technol. 45 9449–9456. 10.1021/es202573f [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Flynn K. J., Raven J. A., Rees T. A. V., Finkel Z., Quigg A., Beardall J. (2010). Is the growth rate hypothesis applicable to microalgae? J. Phycol. 46 1–12. 10.1111/j.1529-8817.2009.00756.x [Cross Ref]
  • Geider R. J., LaRoche J. (2002). Redfield revisited: variability of C[ratio ]N[ratio ]P in marine microalgae and its biochemical basis. Eur. J. Phycol. 37 1–17. 10.1017/S0967026201003456 [Cross Ref]
  • Hao X., Wang C., van Loosdrecht M. C. M., Hu Y. (2013). Looking beyond struvite for P-Recovery. Environ. Sci. Technol. 47 4965–4966. 10.1021/es401140s [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Henze M., Comeau Y. (2008). “Wastewater characterization,” in Biological Wastewater Treatment. Principles, Modeling and Design, eds Henze M., Loosdrecht M. C. M. Van, Ekama G. A., Brdjanovic D., editors. (London: IWA publishing; ), 33.
  • Hillebrand H., Steinert G., Boersma M., Malzahn A., Meunier C. L., Plum C., et al. (2013). Goldman revisited: faster-growing phytoplankton has lower N : P and lower stoichiometric flexibility. Limnol. Oceanogr. 58 2076–2088. 10.4319/lo.2013.58.6.2076 [Cross Ref]
  • Klausmeier C. A., Litchman E., Daufresne T., Levin S. A. (2004a). Optimal nitrogen-to-phosphorus stoichiometry of phytoplankton. Nature 429 171–174. [PubMed]
  • Klausmeier C. A., Litchman E., Levin S. A. (2004b). Phytoplankton growth and stoichiometry under multiple nutrient limitation. Limnol. Oceanogr. 49 1463–1470. 10.4319/lo.2004.49.4_part_2.1463 [Cross Ref]
  • Kujawa-Roeleveld K., Zeeman G. (2006). Anaerobic treatment in decentralised and source-separation-based sanitation concepts. Rev. Environ. Sci. Biotechnol. 5 115–139. 10.1007/s11157-005-5789-9 [Cross Ref]
  • Kumar M. S., Miao Z. H., Wyatt S. K. (2010). Influence of nutrient loads, feeding frequency and inoculum source on growth of Chlorella vulgaris in digested piggery effluent culture medium. Bioresour. Technol. 101 6012–6018. 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.02.080 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Litchman E., Klausmeier C. A., Schofield O. M., Falkowski P. G. (2007). The role of functional traits and trade-offs in structuring phytoplankton communities: scaling from cellular to ecosystem level. Ecol. Lett. 10 1170–1181. 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01117.x [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Maurya R., Chokshi K., Ghosh T., Trivedi K., Pancha I., Kubavat D., et al. (2015). Lipid extracted microalgal biomass residue as a fertilizer substitute for Zea mays L. Front. Plant Sci. 6:1266 10.3389/fpls.2015.01266 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Metting B. (1990). Microalgae applications in agriculture. Dev. Ind. Microbiol. 31 265–270.
  • Mezzari M. P., da Silva M. L. B., Nicoloso R. S., Ibelli A. M. G., Bortoli M., Viancelli A., et al. (2013). Assessment of N2O emission from a photobioreactor treating ammonia-rich swine wastewater digestate. Bioresour. Technol. 149 327–332. 10.1016/j.biortech.2013.09.065 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Mihelcic J. R., Fry L. M., Shaw R. (2011). Global potential of phosphorus recovery from human urine and feces. Chemosphere 84 832–839. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2011.02.046 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Ptacnik R., Solimini A. G., Andersen T., Tamminen T., Brettum P., Lepistö L., et al. (2008). Diversity predicts stability and resource use efficiency in natural phytoplankton communities. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 105 5134–5138. 10.1073/pnas.0708328105 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Roy E. D. (2017). Phosphorus recovery and recycling with ecological engineering: a review. Ecol. Eng. 98 213–227. 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2016.10.076 [Cross Ref]
  • Schmidtke A., Gaedke U., Weithoff G. (2010). A mechanistic basis for underyielding in phytoplankton communities. Ecology 91 212–221. 10.1890/08-2370.1 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Shurin J. B., Abbott R. L., Deal M. S., Kwan G. T., Litchman E., McBride R. C., et al. (2013). Industrial-strength ecology: trade-offs and opportunities in algal biofuel production. Ecol. Lett. 16 1393–1404. 10.1111/ele.12176 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Shurin J. B., Mandal S., Abbott R. L. (2014). Trait diversity enhances yield in algal biofuel assemblages. J. Appl. Ecol. 51 603–611. 10.1111/1365-2664.12242 [Cross Ref]
  • Sipler R. E., Bronk D. A. (2015). “Dynamics of dissolved organic nitrogen,” in Biochemistry of Marine Dissolved Oganic Matter, eds Hansell D. A., Carlson C. A., editors. (Oxford: Elsevier; ).
  • Smith V. H., Sturm B. S. M., deNoyelles F. J., Billings S. A. (2010). The ecology of algal biodiesel production. Trends Ecol. Evol. 25 301–309. 10.1016/j.tree.2009.11.007 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Sterner R. W., Elser J. J. (2002). Ecological Stoichiometry: The Biology of Elements from Molecules to the Biosphere. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Stockenreiter M., Graber A.-K., Haupt F., Stibor H. (2012). The effect of species diversity on lipid production by micro-algal communities. J. Appl. Phycol. 24 45–54. 10.1007/s10811-010-9644-1 [Cross Ref]
  • Stomp M., Huisman J., de Jongh F., Veraart A. J., Gerla D., Rijkeboer M., et al. (2004). Adaptive divergence in pigment composition promotes phytoplankton biodiversity. Nature 432 104–107. 10.1038/nature03044 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Suganya T., Varman M., Masjuki H. H., Renganathan S. (2016). Macroalgae and microalgae as a potential source for commercial applications along with biofuels production: a biorefinery approach. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 55 909–941. 10.1016/j.rser.2015.11.026 [Cross Ref]
  • Tilman D. (1982). Resource competition and community structure. Monogr. Popul. Biol. 17 1–296. [PubMed]
  • Tuantet K., Janssen M., Temmink H., Zeeman G., Wijffels R., Buisman C. N. (2013). Microalgae growth on concentrated human urine. J. Appl. Phycol. 26 287–297. 10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.06.013 [Cross Ref]
  • Udo de Haes H. A., Voortman R. L., Bastein T., Bussink W., Rougoor C. W., Weijden W. J. V. D. (2012). Scarcity of Micronutrients in Soil, Feed, Food, and Mineral Reserves – Urgency and Policy Options. Culemborg: Platform Agriculture, Innovation & Society.
  • Vasconcelos Fernandes T., Shrestha R., Sui Y., Papini G., Zeeman G., Vet L. E. M., et al. (2015). Closing domestic nutrient cycles using microalgae. Environ. Sci. Technol. 49 12450–12456. 10.1021/acs.est.5b02858 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Wijffels R. H., Barbosa M. J. (2010). An outlook on microalgal biofuels. Science 329 796–799. 10.1126/science.1189003 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Wijffels R. H., Barbosa M. J., Eppink M. H. M. (2010). Microalgae for the production of bulk chemicals and biofuels. Biofuels Bioproducts Biorefining 4 287–295. 10.1002/bbb.215 [Cross Ref]
  • Zeller M. A., Hunt R., Jones A., Sharma S. (2013). Bioplastics and their thermoplastic blends from Spirulina and Chlorella microalgae. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 130 3263–3275. 10.1002/app.39559 [Cross Ref]

Articles from Frontiers in Microbiology are provided here courtesy of Frontiers Media SA