|Home | About | Journals | Submit | Contact Us | Français|
Metastatic prostate cancer is presently incurable. The oncogenic protein PTOV1, first described in prostate cancer, was reported as overexpressed and significantly correlated with poor survival in numerous tumors. Here, we investigated the role of PTOV1 in prostate cancer survival to docetaxel and self-renewal ability. Transduction of PTOV1 in docetaxel-sensitive Du145 and PC3 cells significantly increased cell survival after docetaxel exposure and induced docetaxel-resistance genes expression (ABCB1, CCNG2 and TUBB2B). In addition, PTOV1 induced prostatospheres formation and self-renewal genes expression (ALDH1A1, LIN28A, MYC and NANOG). In contrast, Du145 and PC3 cells knockdown for PTOV1 significantly accumulated in the G2/M phase, presented a concomitant increased subG1 peak, and cell death by apoptosis. These effects were enhanced in docetaxel-resistant cells. Analyses of tumor datasets show that PTOV1 expression significantly correlated with prostate tumor grade, drug resistance (CCNG2) and self-renewal (ALDH1A1, MYC) markers. These genes are concurrently overexpressed in most metastatic lesions. Metastases also show PTOV1 genomic amplification in significant co-occurrence with docetaxel-resistance and self-renewal genes. Our findings identify PTOV1 as a promoter of docetaxel-resistance and self-renewal characteristics for castration resistant prostate cancer. The concomitant increased expression of PTOV1, ALDH1A1 and CCNG2 in primary tumors, may predict metastasis and bad prognosis.
Prostate cancer is the most common male malignancy and the second leading cause of death for cancer in men of western Countries . The majority of newly diagnosed localized tumors are successfully treated by surgery. Patients with metastatic prostate cancer undergo androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), very effective in reducing prostate tumor and metastatic growth. However, progression to a castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) eventually occurs [2, 3]. Docetaxel, a taxol derived drug that prevents microtubule de-polymerization and mitotic division, was the standard treatment in US for CRPC patients until 2010 . More recently, docetaxel combined with androgen deprivation therapy have been used at earlier stages to improve the outcome for men with metastases at first presentation [5–7], but unfortunately in most cases it results in the development of a very aggressive resistant cancer.
PTOV1 was previously demonstrated to be pro-oncogenic in prostate cancer [8–11]. The protein is strongly expressed in primary tumors and metastatic lesions [9–11]. Its detection in premalignant lesions of high grade prostate intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN) is helpful to identify patients with significantly higher probability to develop prostate cancer [12, 13]. PTOV1 is overexpressed and significantly associated to a high grade of malignancy, increased proliferation, and unfavorable prognosis in a number of other neoplasias [13–18]. Its expression induces spheroid formation in vitro, tumor growth, invasion and metastasis of CRPC cells [10, 11]. Mechanistic studies have shown that PTOV1 cytoplasmic localization is associated to activation of translation of a subset of mRNAs through the interaction with RACK1 and ribosomes, leading to a specific increased synthesis of the c-Jun oncogene . In turn, c-Jun was shown to promote SNAI1 transcription and the activation of an epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) program, leading to tumor growth and metastasis . In the nucleus, PTOV1 acts as a transcriptional repressor of HES1 and HEY1 genes, two main targets of the Notch receptor, thus revealing its oncogenic function in counteracting the tumor suppressor action of Notch signaling in advanced prostate cancer . PTOV1 is a transcriptional repressor of the DKK1 gene, an action that triggers the activation of the Wnt/β-catenin signaling and tumor progression in breast cancer cells , and of the retinoic acid receptor (RARβ), favoring cell resistance to retinoic acid . A recent review about the known oncogenic mechanisms of PTOV1 in tumors is available .
The resistance to docetaxel in treated tumors is associated to the expression of alternative β-tubulin isoforms, genes encoding for drug efflux pumps, and survival factors [21–23]. In addition, resistant metastatic growth has been associated to rare populations of slow growing cells within tumors identified as cancer stem cells (CSCs) that have intrinsic resistance to therapeutic stress [24–26]. Recent data suggest that taxanes can also affect androgen receptor (AR) signaling by inhibiting ligand-induced AR nuclear translocation and downstream transcriptional activation of its target genes and confirming a role for microtubules in AR trafficking . However, AR nuclear translocation and signaling was not inhibited in cells with acquired β-tubulin mutations, that prevent taxanes-induced microtubule stabilization . In addition, c-Jun, SNAI1, and NOTCH2/Hedgehog pathways have been implicated in the development of resistance to docetaxel or paclitaxel [23, 29, 30]. However, despite the intense research, the mechanisms of prostate cancer resistance to docetaxel are not completely understood and more investigations are required to design targeted therapies able to overcome its insurgence.
Here, our findings reveal a critical function for PTOV1 in the activation of genes implicated in the acquisition of resistance to docetaxel and the appearance of a stemness-like phenotype. These results are confirmed by analyses of datasets from human prostate tumors and reveal a specific and significant direct correlation of PTOV1 with ALDH1A1 and CCNG2. These findings identify PTOV1 as a novel potential therapeutic target for patients with metastatic prostate cancer.
Increased mRNA and protein levels of PTOV1 were shown to correlate with prostate cancer progression [10, 11] and to promote CSCs-like properties [11, 16]. Here, we investigated whether its overexpression in prostate cancer cells is associated to the acquisition of resistance to a therapeutic stress. Thus, PTOV1 expression was analyzed in Du145 and PC3 prostate cancer cells rendered resistant to docetaxel in vitro as representative models of CRPC progression to a docetaxel resistant (DR) stage . DR-Du145 and DR-PC3 cells show an evident mesenchymal phenotype (Figure (Figure1A),1A), as previously described [31, 32], a very significant decrease in epithelial markers, and overexpression of genes implicated in the acquisition of drug resistance, previously reported in taxanes resistant cells [31–36]. In contrast to its low levels in benign prostate derived RWPE1 cells, PTOV1 is strongly expressed in most prostate carcinoma cell lines (Supplementary Figure 1A). Both DR-Du145 and DR-PC3 cell variants have a consistently increased protein levels for PTOV1 compared with parental docetaxel sensitive (DS) cells (Figure (Figure1B1B and Supplementary Figure 1B), and a significant increase in RNA levels is observed in DR-Du145 but not in DR-PC3 cells (Figure (Figure1C).1C). To address whether translation rates may contribute to increase PTOV1 protein levels in DR cells, we analyzed the levels of PTOV1 transcripts more actively translated by studying the amount of mRNA loaded on polysomes (Supplementary Figure 2A). No significant differences are found comparing the total (DR-T) and polysomes-associated mRNA levels (DR-P) in DR cells compared to control DS cells, suggesting that the higher protein expression observed in DR cells is not contributed by an enhanced protein synthesis. In addition, although a significant increase in PTOV1 protein stability is detected in cycloheximide (CHX)-treated DR-Du145 cells, no significant differences were detected in DR-PC3 cells, suggesting that the mechanisms underlying the higher PTOV1 protein expression in DR cells need to be explored further (Supplementary Figure 2B).
To establish if the increased PTOV1 expression in DR cells has a role in the acquisition of resistance to docetaxel, DS cells were transduced with a lentivirus encoding HAPTOV1, or a control lentivirus encoding the GFP gene (Figure (Figure2A;2A; Supplementary Figure 3A). Both the endogenous and the ectopic PTOV1 show similar distributions in the membrane, cytoplasm and nucleus (Supplementary Figure 3B). Transduced cells were treated with increasing doses of docetaxel for 48 h (Du145) and 72 h (PC3). The expression of PTOV1 was associated to a significantly augmented IC50 to docetaxel in both cell lines, compared to control DS-GFP cells (Figure (Figure2B).2B). The IC50 for docetaxel in resistant Du145 and PC3 cells transduced with control lentivirus are also shown for comparison. To elucidate the molecular mechanisms implicated in this PTOV1-mediated chemo resistance, a battery of genes previously implicated in docetaxel resistance were analyzed in PTOV1-overexpressing cells [22, 23, 31, 34]. Figure Figure2C2C shows that PTOV1 significantly induces the expression of CCNG2, ABCB1, TUBB4A and TUBB2B genes, supporting its action in promoting the resistance to docetaxel. The expression of PTOV1 significantly associated with the levels of the multidrug transporter ABCB1 (Supplementary Figure 3C).
Because upregulation of ABCB1 and TUBB2B were also observed when PTOV1 was overexpressed in the AR-positive LNCaP cells (Supplementary Figure 3D), the PTOV1-induced upregulation of these genes may be AR independent.
In contrast, ectopic PTOV1 in DS-Du145 and DS-PC3 cells exposed to cabazitaxel, a second generation of taxanes synthesized to overcome the resistance to docetaxel, did not produce significant changes in the cells sensitivity to this drug, indicating the specificity of PTOV1 in promoting resistance to docetaxel in CRPC cells (Supplementary Figure 4) . Results also suggest that the induction of ABCB1 expression might be a relevant part of the mechanism by which PTOV1 confers cells with resistance to docetaxel.
The significant association between PTOV1 and ABCB1 transporter expression, a protein also implicated in the modulation of the stemness phenotype in cancer cells , is in agreement with previous data showing PTOV1 promoting self-renewing properties of prostate and breast cancer cells [11, 16]. The use of sphere-forming assays provides a widely recognized in vitro method for the identification and characterization of CSCs . Thus, we investigated whether the role of PTOV1 in the resistance to docetaxel is associated to the activation of self-renewing characteristics in prostate cancer cells by analyzing the effects of the overexpression and knockdown of PTOV1 in the prostatosphere forming capacities of docetaxel-sensitive cells. Figure Figure3A3A and and3B3B show that DS-HAPTOV1 cells have a significant increase in the sphere-forming efficiency in comparison to DS-GFP control cells, confirming the PTOV1 promoted induction of a stemness-like phenotype. In Du145 cells, the overexpression of HAPTOV1 also associated to significantly increased levels of stemness genes LIN28A, ALDH1A1 and MYC, whereas in PC3 cells it associated to a significant expression of LIN28A, MYC, NANOG and POU5F1 genes (Figure (Figure3C),3C), in agreement with reports in breast cancer cells . Significantly increased levels of LIN28A and MYC were also observed in LNCaP cells overexpressing HAPTOV1 (Supplementary Figure 5A). Of note, the expression of PTOV1 is significantly associated with the levels of LIN28A in Du145 cells (Supplementary Figure 5B), indicating again its ability to induce a stemness phenotype and confirming previous observations [11, 16].
PTOV1 actions were previously described to be mediated in part through the activation of c-Jun protein synthesis  and Wnt/β-catenin signaling . In Du145 cells the inhibition of JNK signaling significantly decreases ABCB1 expression, as previously described  (Supplementary Figure 6A). Regarding Wnt/ β-catenin signaling, these cells require Wnt3a conditioned medium (Wnt3a-CM) for its activation (Supplementary Figure 6B). Wnt3a-CM upregulates ABCB1, ALDH1A1 and Wnt-target genes LEF1 and JUN, effects counteracted by the iCRT14 Wnt inhibitor, as previously observed [41–44] (Supplementary Figure 6B). The overexpression of PTOV1 significantly increased ABCB1 expression and, reversibly, this was significantly abolished by Wnt and JNK inhibitors, suggesting that PTOV1 action on this gene is mediated at least in part by these pathways (Supplementary Figure 6C). However, no inhibition of ALDH1A1 or LIN28A expression is observed in the presence of these inhibitors in PTOV1-overexpressing cells, suggesting a Wnt and JNK independent actions of PTOV1 (Supplementary Figure 6C).
As expected, the knockdown of PTOV1 by different short hairpin RNAs (Supplementary Figure 7A) provokes a striking and significant repressive effect in the cells sphere-forming efficiency (SFE) in comparison to control cells bearing an unrelated shRNA sequence (shCTL) (Figure (Figure3A3A and and3B).3B). These findings indicate a promoting action of PTOV1 in proliferation and/or survival of prostate cancer cells. Because docetaxel resistant prostate cancer cells show an increased expression of PTOV1 (Figure (Figure1B),1B), we have determined the effects of its knockdown using two different shRNAs directed to different sequences of the gene PTOV1, in both docetaxel sensitive and resistant cells (Supplementary Figure 7A and 7B). RNA and protein expression are efficiently downregulated by these shRNAs, as it is shown by real-time PCR, Western blotting and immunofluorescence assays, the latter showing that downregulation of the protein is observed both in nucleus and cytoplasm (Supplementary Figure 7A-7D). Cell proliferation requires the expression of PTOV1 (Figure (Figure4A).4A). This impair in proliferation is translated in a significant increase in cell mortality, as shown by the Trypan blue exclusion assay (Figure (Figure4B).4B). These effects are enhanced in DR cells compared to DS cells, suggesting that resistant cells are more dependent on the expression of PTOV1. The use of a third shRNA (sh1397) corroborate that PTOV1 inhibition significantly affects cell proliferation and viability (Supplementary Figure 8). The decrease in PTOV1 levels induces a loss of reproductive integrity and inability to proliferate indefinitely, as shown by clonogenic assays (Supplementary Figure 9A and 9B). Of note, docetaxel resistant cells are more enriched with low-proliferative cells compared to sensitive cells, as it is evident from the more abundant formation of smaller colonies.
To investigate into the mechanisms of the requirement for PTOV1 in proliferation and/or survival, the cell cycle was analyzed by flow cytometry using propidium iodide. Figure Figure4C4C and and4D4D show that cells knockdowns for PTOV1 significantly accumulate in the G2/M phase in concomitance to a significant increase in the proportion of cells in the sub-G1 peak (Supplementary Figure 10A and 10B). In agreement with our previous observations, the accumulation of cells in the G2/M phase and the increase in the sub-G1 peak are more pronounced in DR cells (Figure (Figure4C4C and and4D).4D). The expression of cyclin B1 and the appearance of a cleaved PARP1 fragment in the knockdown cells, confirm the accumulation of cells in G2/M phase and the boost of apoptosis observed by cell cycle analyses (Figure (Figure4E).4E). These results support a requirement of the onco-protein PTOV1 for the survival of Du145 and PC3 prostate cancer cells.
The expression of ALDH1A1, CCNG2 and MYC genes has been reported in aggressive prostate tumors [34, 45–48]. We examined the clinical significance of their upregulation and the association with PTOV1, highly overexpressed in aggressive prostate tumors (Supplementary Figure 11) as previously reported [10, 11], using publicly available database containing expression data, clinical and pathological information from prostate tumors of not-treated patients. These analyses reveal that primary prostate tumors show significantly higher expression of PTOV1, CCNG2 and MYC compared to benign tissue (GSE29079), and PTOV1 levels significantly correlate with CCNG2 and MYC mRNA levels (Figure (Figure5A5A and and5B).5B). As expected, patients with higher Gleason score have significantly higher levels of PTOV1 compared to patients with lower Gleason score (GSE46691) (Figure (Figure5C)5C) [9–11]. In this set of tumors, the expression of ALDH1A1 and CCNG2 significantly correlates with prostate tumor aggressiveness (Figure (Figure5C),5C), in agreement with previous reports [45, 46]. In addition, a statistically significant correlation exists between the expression of PTOV1 with ALDH1A1 and CCNG2 (Figure (Figure5D).5D). However, the expression of MYC appears more significantly associated to the presence of carcinoma compared to benign tissue, than to the aggressiveness of the tumors according to this dataset. ALDH1A1, PTOV1 and CCNG2 transcripts levels are also significantly higher in primary prostatic adenocarcinomas of patients that after radical prostatectomy developed regional or distal metastasis (Figure (Figure5E),5E), suggesting their relationship with metastatic progression.
The correlation of the overexpression of PTOV1 with tumor progression and poor survival is confirmed in breast cancer [15, 16, 49]. We analyzed dataset from breast cancer tissues derived from patients treated with taxanes plus anthracyclines (GSE28844)  and found a significant increase of PTOV1 and CCNG2 mRNA levels in patients with lower Miller and Payne grade, corresponding to bad responders to that chemotherapy (Supplementary Figure 12), reinforcing the potential role of PTOV1 and CCNG2 in conferring resistance to chemotherapy with taxanes.
To study whether the associations of PTOV1 with self-renewal and docetaxel resistant genes found here are detectable in metastasis, we interrogated database containing information from metastatic lesions of prostate cancer patients [50–52]. Forty-nine metastatic lesions from 114 metastatic specimens had available data for RNA expression. Significantly, 96-100% of those lesions show concurrent increased expression of PTOV1, CCNG2, and MYC genes (Figure (Figure6A).6A). Similarly, concurrent expression is also found for ALDH1A1 gene in 33% of lesions.
Most alterations at the DNA level cover the complete amplification of PTOV1, amplified in 19% of metastatic specimens (Figure (Figure6B),6B), and include neighboring genes MED25 and AKT1S1 (Supplementary Figure 13). Frequent amplifications of MYC, ALDH1A1 and CCNG2 genes are also found (Figure (Figure6B).6B). In addition, highly significant co-occurrence of alterations in DNA events is found among PTOV1, ALDH1A1, and MYC (Table (Table11).
Altogether, our findings indicate that the overexpression of PTOV1 in prostate cancer promotes the acquisition of resistance to chemotherapy with docetaxel that is parallel to the increase in self-renewal properties of prostate cancer cells. The significant increased expression of PTOV1 in primary prostate tumors may be predictor of metastastatic progression.
The oncogenic protein PTOV1 is associated to bad prognosis in several tumor types [8–11, 14, 15, 17, 18, 53–55]. In this work we provide evidences supporting its role in promoting the resistance to docetaxel and self-renewal abilities of prostate cancer cells. We further show that the expression of PTOV1, ALDH1A1 and CCNG2 found in primary prostate tumors of patients that had developed metastasis, is also found in a cohort of metastasic lesions, revealing that the above genes may be predictors of metastasis and bad prognosis.
Supporting previous findings of PTOV1 activity associated to more aggressive, potentially resistant stages [8–11], we show that docetaxel resistant prostate cancer cells express increased levels of PTOV1 concomitantly with genes associated to resistance [31, 33–36]. The PTOV1 induced expression in docetaxel sensitive cells, significantly increased their IC50 to this drug and activated the expression of ABCB1, TUBB4A, TUBB2B, MYC, and CCNG2 genes, demonstrating PTOV1 as a relevant factor to overcome toxicity to docetaxel. The PTOV1-promoted increase of ABCB1 expression, a drug transporter with high affinity for docetaxel but low affinity for cabazitaxel [37, 56], might explain its specific action in inducing cell resistance to docetaxel but not to cabazitaxel. The upregulation of ABCB1 might be a major mechanism of taxane resistance in the early response to docetaxel in advanced tumors, and in Du145, 22Rv1 and C4-2B prostate cancer cell lines [22, 23, 36, 57]. However, the expression of the protein ABCB1, not its RNA levels, was shown to correlate with the Gleason score in prostate tumors, possibly explained by a lower efficiency of RNA evaluation in those samples . Recently, PTOV1 was shown to increase the proportion of cells in the side population (SP) through the activation of Wnt/β-catenin signaling in breast cancer . Several studies described SP cells as CSC populations with upregulation of ABCB1 and a taxol-resistant phenotype [59–61]. These observations support our findings and suggest that PTOV1 promotes the acquisition of resistance to docetaxel and of stemness features partly through the expression of ABCB1. Although the specific increase of stemenss genes ALDH1A1 and LIN28A by PTOV1 does not appear mediated by Wnt and JNK signaling, the PTOV1 promoted ABCB1 activation might be mediated by these pathways.
The concurrent overexpression of CCNG2 and ALDH1A1 found in the cell lines with the ectopic HAPTOV1 is confirmed in primary tumors of patients that developed metastasis and in metastatic lesions of CRPC patients. While ALDH1A1 and MYC genes were reported in metastasis of several tumor types and associated with poor prognosis [39, 45, 47, 62, 63], for CCNG2, a cell cycle checkpoint cyclin upregulated in response to DNA damage, the association to stemness was not clear. It was reported to have tumor suppressor functions in different neoplasias [64, 65], although, supporting our observations, CCNG2 positively associated with prostate cancer recurrence after radical prostatectomy . CCNG2 induces microtubule bundling and stability, and contributes to resistance to chemotherapy, presumably by facilitating a delay in the transition from G1/S to G2/M phase that allow reorganization of microtubules and chromatin repairs after drug exposure [34, 66–68].
The development of CRPC was described to lead to increased resistance to docetaxel also in chemotherapy-naïve patients, suggesting that an intrinsic chemoresistance may be present in tumors even before drug exposure [69–71]. Chemotherapy effectively induces death of the bulk of proliferating tumor cells and concomitantly results in the enrichment of cell populations characterized by a higher intrinsic resistance, such as CSCs, considered major responsible for the poor prognosis of patients with cancer [25, 69, 72]. In line with this possibility, our findings suggest that aggressive tumor cells with increased expression of PTOV1, ALDH1A1, and CCNG2 might correspond to potential CSCs with great capacity to metastasize and higher resistance to docetaxel.
The analyses of public datasets containing data from untreated patients, do not confirm the statistically significant correlation of PTOV1 with ABCB1, TUBB4A, TUBB2B, NANOG, POU5F1, and LIN28A found in the cell line models. This lack of correlation might be related to the metastatic origin of the cell lines from CRPC patients, a more advanced tumor stage compared to the untreated tumors included in the data base [31, 73]. In addition, the known heterogeneous genetic profiles of prostate tumors may not allow to discern those alterations found in isolated cells, that may be present in specific subsets of tumors but become undetectable in a large heterogeneous cohort [58, 74].
PTOV1 action was previously found associated to cell cycle progression of prostate cancer cells . Here, we show its critical role for the survival of docetaxel-resistant cells. PTOV1 is an activator of protein synthesis and its function might be crucial in the G2 phase of the cell cycle before mitosis when there is a need for a rapid synthesis of proteins required for cell division . In addition, the activation of Snail1 expression by PTOV1  might be linked to its action in the development of resistance to docetaxel [29, 30]. These results support that cells arrested at the end of the G2 phase in PTOV1 knockdowns are unable to bypass the DNA damage checkpoint and enter a programmed cell death.
All together our findings indicate that PTOV1 confers prostate cancer cells the advantages to survive docetaxel toxicity, through upregulation of ABCB1 and genes associated to docetaxel resistance and pluripotency factors. Our study identifies PTOV1, ALDH1A1 and CCNG2 as potential markers of metastasis and bad prognosis when detected in primary prostate tumors. Although further validations are required in additional models, our data reveal that blocking PTOV1 might be a valid future option to prevent the development of resistance to docetaxel in CRPC.
HEK293T, human prostate adenocarcinoma LNCaP, Du145 and PC3 cells lines were purchased from the American Type Culture Collection, Manassas, VA, USA. The docetaxel resistant cell lines Du145 and PC3 were developed as previously described . HEK293T were cultured in DMEM (BioWest, Nuaillé, France), docetaxel sentitive and resistant Du145 cells and LNCaP cells were cultured in RPMI-1640 (BioWest) and PC3 DS and PC3 DR in F12K nutrient mixture medium (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Culture media were supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), 2 mM l-glutamine, 100 U of penicillin/ml, 100 μg of streptomycin/ml, and 0.1 mM non-essential amino acids (all from BioWest). Docetaxel resistant cell lines were maintained with 2.5 nM of Docetaxel (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO). Antibody to PTOV1 was produced and purified as previously described [8, 9]. Additional antibodies were obtained from: goat anti-actin (I-19) (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA); mouse anti-HA.11 (16B12) (Covance, MA); mouse anti-Cyclin B1(V152) (Abcam, Cambridge, MA); rabbit anti-PARP1 (H-250) (Santa Cruz Biotechnology). Lentiviral vectors carrying short-hairpin RNA (shRNA, TRCN0000143905, TRCN0000140104 and TRCN0000139737) to PTOV1 were obtained from Sigma.
Lentiviral particles were produced in HEK293T by cotransfection of lentiviral vectors carrying short hairpin RNA (shRNA) or HAPTOV1 templates and plasmids encoding gag, pol and env proteins as previously described .
The lentiviral pHAPTOV1-ires-GFP vector was generated by replacing the Luciferase from with Hemagglutinin (HA)-tagged human PTOV1, as previously described 
Cells (3×105 cells/well) were seeded on 6 well plates. After 24 h, cells were treated with complete medium supplemented with 100 μg/ml cycloheximide (Sigma-Aldrich) at indicated times (1, 3, 6, 9 or 15 h). Protein extraction and western blotting analysis were performed as previously described .
Cells (4×103 cells/well) were seeded on collagen-coated 96-well plates in sextuplicates. After 24 h, cells were control-treated (DMSO) or treated with the drug at different concentrations for 48 h for Du145 cells and 72 h for PC3 cells. Fresh medium with the drug was replaced every day. At the indicated time points, cells were fixed in formaldehyde 4% solution, washed with PBS and stained with 0.5% crystal violet. Crystals were dissolved with 15% acetic acid and optical density was read at 595 nm.
Cells, transducted with lentiviral particles during 24 h, were seeded (5×104 cells/well) on 24-well plates in triplicates. After 72 h, cells were collected and stained with Trypan blue to identify dead cells. Alive and dead cells were counted in a Neubauer chamber.
Single-cells derived from monolayer cultures were seeded (3 × 103 cells/well) in 24-well Ultra Low Attachment culture plates (Corning Costar, Cambridge, MA) in triplicates in 1 ml of DMEM-F12 culture medium (Invitrogen) containing 1% methyl cellulose, 60 μg/ml glucose, 1 μM hydrocortisone, 1 μg/ml putrescine, 10 μg/ml transferrin, 3 nM sodium selenite, 2.5 ug/ml insulin, 10 ng/ml β-FGF, 20 ng/ul, EGF5 U.I./ml heparin (Sigma-Aldrich) and 0.4% B27 (Invitrogen). Prostatospheres were fed every two days and allowed to grow for 14 days. The number of spheres (> 50 cells/sphere) were then counted and expressed as ratio of spheres/1000 plated cells (Sphere Forming Efficiency, SFE).
Total RNA was extracted with the RNeasy mini kit (QIAGEN, Valencia, CA), reverse transcribed with the RevertAid H Minus First Strand cDNA Synthesis kit (ThermoScientific) and real-time qPCR performed with the Universal Probe Library (Roche, Penzberg, Upper Bavaria, Germany) on a LightCycler 480 RealTime PCR instrument (Roche). Primers are shown in Supplementary Table 1. The ΔΔCt method was applied to estimate relative transcript levels. HMBS amplification levels were used as internal references. β-actin amplification levels were used as internal references for real-time PCR of polysomes-bounded RNA. At least three independent experiments with triplicate samples were performed. Values are presented as mean + SD.
The mRNA expression data of several genes was analyzed in dataset from human prostate tumors (GSE46691, n=545; GSE2907, n=95) and breast tumors (GSE28844, n=61) using the R2 bioinformatics platform (http://r2.amc.nl). The most informative probeset, according to its average present signal (APS) and average value (Avg) was selected in every dataset, sometimes resulting in a different probeset as the choice of R2. DNA amplification, point mutations, deletions of the genes of interest were analyzed from published datasets of human prostate tumors using cBioPortal platform [50, 51].
Western blotting analyses were performed as previously described . Specific reactivity to antibodies was detected with a chemiluminescent substrate (GE Healthcare, Solingen, Germany). Actin or tubulin signal was used to monitor protein loading and transfer efficiencies.
One million cells were collected by trypsinization and washed twice with PBS. After centrifugation 5 min at 300 xG, pellets were resuspended and fixed with 70% cold ethanol. Cells were stored overnight at 4°C. Next, cells were pelleted by centrifugation, washed twice with cold PBS and resuspended in staining solution, 1 mM sodium citrate, 15 μg/ml propidium iodide and 300 μg/ml DNAse free RNase A and incubated 4°C O/N. The samples (1 ×106 cells) were analyzed by flow cytometry with a BD FacsCalibur device and FlowJo software.
All data analyzed were from at least triplicate experiments. Results are expressed as means + standard deviation of the means. IC50 values for docetaxel treatment were determined by non-linear regression. For statistical analysis, according to whether data were sampled from a Gaussian distribution or not, unpaired t test or Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare two groups. For multiple comparisons, ANOVA followed by Dunnett method or the alternative non parametric method (Kruskal-Wallis followed by Dunn method) were employed. To quantify the association between two quantitative variables, the Spearman correlation was used for statistical analysis. The Fisher's exact test was employed to determine whether a nonrandom association of co-occurrence between two categorical variables was significant. A p value < 0.05 was taken as the level of significance. These analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism 5 software.
Authors wish to acknowledge the Vall d’Hebron Research Institute for support, S. Pont and E. Prada for technical help. O. Fornas for support with flow cytometry analysis. F. Gebauer for support with polysome profiling analyses.
Author contributionsV.C. carried out the majority of the experimental work, the statistical analyses, helped in the design of the study, analyses of data, and participated in the writing of the manuscript. YP, VM, ER, prepared plasmids and lentiviral particles, performed spheroid assays, cell viability assays and qPCR analyses. M.M and B.M. provided cell lines and reagents. M.L. participated in spheroid assays development. M.O., J.P., and J.M. participated in the data analyses and interpretation in clinical settings. R.P. conceived and designed the study, interpreted the data, and wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
The authors declare no potential conflicts of interest.
This work is supported by the Ministry of Economy MINECO SAF2014-59958-R, the AGAUR 2014 SGR733, Red Temática de Investigación Cooperativa en Cáncer (RTICC), the Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII) RD12/0036/0035, PI15/00676, PI12/01226, and Industex S.L.