|Home | About | Journals | Submit | Contact Us | Français|
Oligodendrocyte (OL) maturation and axon-glial communication are required for proper myelination in the developing brain. However, physiological properties of OLs remain largely uncharacterized in different brain regions. The roles of oligodendroglial voltage-activated Na+ channels (Nav) and electrical excitability in relation to maturation to the myelinating stage are controversial, although oligodendroglial excitability is potentially important for promoting axon myelination. Here we show spiking properties of OLs and their role in axon-glial communication in the auditory brainstem. A subpopulation of pre-myelinating OLs (pre-OLs) can generate Nav1.2-driven action potentials throughout postnatal development to early adulthood. In addition, excitable pre-OLs receive glutamatergic inputs from neighboring neurons that trigger pre-OL spikes. Knockdown of Nav1.2 channels in pre-OLs alters their morphology, reduces axon-OL interactions and impairs myelination. Our results suggest that Nav1.2-driven spiking of pre-OLs is an integral component of axon-glial communication and is required for the function and maturation of OLs to promote myelination.
Oligodendrocytes (OLs) produce the layered myelin sheath surrounding axons, which is essential for fast propagation of saltatory nerve impulses and maintenance of axon integrity in the central nervous system (CNS). OL lineage cells mature to the myelinating stage by proliferating and differentiating from the precursor stage. It has been proposed that the excitability of oligodendroglia, once considered non-excitable cells, is a potentially important mechanism for promoting axon myelination. However, the extent of OL excitability remains controversial. OL lineage cells share some characteristics with neurons, including the expression of functional voltage-activated Na+ channels (Nav), the ability to generate a spike and the presence of synaptic inputs1–5. The synaptic input from neurons can be glutamatergic or GABAergic, but either can induce depolarization1–7. However, the ability of oligodendroglia to fire action potentials (APs) exhibiting a distinct spike threshold and repetitive firing is controversial. One recent study demonstrated that OL precursor cells (OPCs) expressing neural/glial antigen 2 (NG2) exhibit a form of repetitive AP firing2; however, others found that OPCs display single spike-like events upon depolarizing current injection, or they do not generate any spikes4, 8. Furthermore, it has been thought that glial excitability is restricted to OPCs and is rapidly downregulated during the transition from OPCs to immature pre-myelinating OLs (pre-OLs4, 8).
Pre-OLs express 2′,3′-cyclic nucleotide phosphohydrolase (CNPase), myelin proteolipid protein and its alternatively spliced isoform DM-20 (DM20-PLP) and OL marker O1, but not NG29. Morphologically, pre-OLs exhibit a number of processes attached to axons and form a few thin sheaths similar to the T-shape morphology described by Bakiri et al. (2011) and Kukley et al. (2010)8, 10. Interestingly, pre-OLs are rarely observed in the hippocampus, where OPCs and myelinating OLs are frequently observed8, raising the possibility that pre-OLs temporally appear and rapidly mature to myelinating OLs in gray matter areas of the CNS. It remains unknown whether oligodendroglial excitability in the precursor stage is completely lost or can be transferred to pre-OLs in highly myelinated areas of the brain.
In this study, we investigate OL excitability and the constitutive roles of OL beyond the precursor stage through postnatal development in the rat brainstem, where compact myelination is critical for ensuring the fidelity and reliability of neurotransmission11, 12. We chose the medial nucleus of the trapezoid body (MNTB) in the auditory brainstem as a highly myelinated and synapse-rich area, where different types of cells (neurons, astrocytes and OLs) are clearly detectable by their shape, size and intrinsic properties: calyx of Held terminals (cup-shaped structures enveloping the postsynaptic cell body13, 14), MNTB principal neurons (large and globular, diameter >20µm, capacitance >30pF15), and OLs (small and round cell body, diameter <10µm, capacitance <20pF).
We describe a subpopulation of pre-OLs exhibiting glutamatergic inputs, Nav currents and APs. We further demonstrate that downregulation of Nav1.2-driven excitability in these excitable pre-OLs alters the morphological maturation of OL lineage cells, the formation of axon-oligodendroglia interactions and myelination in the auditory brainstem. Our results suggest that oligodendroglial excitability driven by Nav1.2 currents is a conserved property during postnatal development and plays an important role in the interactions between oligodendroglial cells and neighboring axons, as well as in myelination.
Between postnatal days 7 and 14 (P7−P14), when axon myelination occurs in the auditory brainstem, we identified glial cells that were able to generate APs in response to current injections (Fig. 1a, b). These excitable glial cells were identified as OLs based on post-recording immunostaining, morphology and electrophysiological properties. Cells were filled with Alexa 568 during whole-cell recording and subsequently stained with antibodies against the OL marker O1, the neuronal marker NeuN and the astrocyte marker glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP; Fig. 1c). Morphologically, OLs were distinguishable from pre- and postsynaptic neurons and astrocytes based on their shape and size. The O1+ immature OLs had a smaller round cell body of diameter ~10µm, whereas the presynaptic calyx terminal had a cup-shaped structure enveloping the NeuN+ postsynaptic MNTB principal neuron with a diameter of >20µm. In addition, the firing properties of excitable OLs were distinct from those of presynaptic terminals and postsynaptic MNTB neurons. Astrocytes with GFAP+ processes did not show spiking properties (Supplementary Fig. 1). The spike-generating excitable glia could thus be identified as OLs, not neurons or astrocytes.
The resting membrane potential of excitable OLs was −73±1.3mV (n=34). The minimum current required to elicit a single AP was 262±31.9pA for 1.8±0.2ms (n=13), and the AP threshold was −32±6.7mV (n=13), as determined by the membrane potential at the inflection point. A short depolarizing current injection (500pA, 1.8ms) evoked a single AP with amplitude 119±22.1mV and half-width 1.4±0.13ms in excitable OLs. APs overshot beyond 0mV, with the peak reaching 29±4.9mV (n=13, Fig. 1b). Some excitable OLs discharged two to three APs with continued depolarization (300ms), whereas most showed a tendency for strong adaptation. On the basis of these parameters, the APs of excitable pre-OLs are bona fide APs.
Next, we determined the developmental stage of the excitable OLs. We performed post-recording immunostaining of excitable OLs using specific markers for each stage: NG2 for OPCs, CNPase and DM20-PLP for pre-OLs and myelin basic protein (MBP) for mature myelinating OLs8, 9. Excitable OLs were positive for CNPase and DM20-PLP but not for NG2 or MBP (at P9−P14, n=10, 7, 7 and 5, Fig. 2a). CNPase immunoactivity was detected from processes and somatic membranes, rather than the somatic cytosol of pre-OLs (Supplementary Fig. 2). To confirm the identity and differentiation status of these excitable OLs, we injected an adenovirus encoding CNPase promoter-eGFP into the MNTB using stereotaxic injection (Fig. 2b). A subpopulation of CNPase-eGFP+ cells (8 out of 32 recorded cells) generated APs in response to depolarizing current injections (80 and 120pA, 300ms; Fig. 2c). Thus, excitable OLs belong to the immature pre-myelination stage (i.e., pre-OL).
In the MNTB (P7–14), we classified three different types of CNPase+OLs based on their structural and functional properties. In the morphological analysis of three-dimensional (3D) reconstructed images, excitable pre-OLs displayed a soma diameter of 9.7±0.67μm, a cell volume of 1441±441.5μm3, and a total process length of 697±72.6μm (n=12). Their main processes evidently contacted axons or neurons but did not align with or enwrap axons, consistent with immature OLs (Fig. 3a and Supplementary Fig. 3). Non-excitable pre-OLs had a soma diameter of 12.1±2.4µm (n=15), and a number of processes had not yet enwrapped axons. The cell volume was 2593±290.5μm3, and the total process length was 784±85.1μm (n=4, Fig. 3b and Supplementary Fig. 3). Thus, the morphology of non-excitable pre-OLs was consistent with that of immature pre-OLs not yet starting to myelinate, similar to excitable pre-OLs. However, non-excitable pre-OLs exhibited a larger membrane capacitance compared with excitable pre-OLs (40±2.5pF, n=34, vs. 17±0.9pF, n=26; t-test, P<0.0001, Supplementary Fig. 3), which may be due to a larger cell volume. In addition, we identified CNPase+mature OLs, which formed thin enwrapping structures around axons and exhibited larger membrane capacitance (>80pF, Fig. 3c) and lower input resistance compared with excitable and non-excitable OLs (mature OLs: 0.28±0.07GΩ, n=6, non-excitable: 0.49±0.32GΩ, n=10 and excitable: 0.9±0.1GΩ, n=18, analysis of variance (ANOVA), P=0.001, Supplementary Fig. 3).
Excitable pre-OLs exhibited Nav-mediated inward currents, which were completely blocked with tetrodotoxin (TTX; 1μM), indicating the presence of Nav channels. The current–voltage relationship curve (I–V curve) revealed outwardly rectifying K+ currents and voltage-activated inward currents with an inverted bell shape (290±27.2pA at 0mV, n=32, Fig. 3d, g). Non-excitable pre-OLs displayed the fast inactivating outward currents, similar to those seen in excitable OLs, but lacked distinctive voltage-activated inward currents (Fig. 3e, h). The I–V curve, showing outward rectification, was similar to that obtained from excitable cells. Mature OLs had larger outward currents with less rectification (Fig. 3f, i) and also had Ba2+-sensitive inwardly rectifying K+ currents, the upregulation of which has been reported during OL maturation16. In contrast, excitable pre-OLs did not display Ba2+-sensitive inwardly rectifying K+ currents (Supplementary Fig. 3).
Excitable pre-OLs generated APs in response to depolarizing current injection (Fig. 3j), whereas the membrane potential of non-excitable OLs and mature OLs increased with increasing current injections, not showing APs (Fig. 3k, l). Non-excitable pre-OLs and mature OLs displayed a resting membrane potential of −81±0.6mV (n=32) and –82±1.8mV (n=6), respectively, which were more negative than those obtained with the excitable pre-OLs (Supplementary Fig. 3).
OPCs (NG2+ cells) have voltage-activated Na+ currents1–3, but it is unclear whether these currents can generate spikes. We thus compared the active and passive properties of pre-OLs (CNPase+/DM20-PLP+) with those of OPCs (NG2+) in the MNTB. OPCs in the MNTB at P4−P6 could be classified into two populations based on the presence or absence of Nav-mediated currents. In response to current step injections (60–140pA/300ms), OPCs with Na+ currents displayed graded depolarization peaks without a distinct threshold. A sharp depolarization was followed by a small and incomplete repolarization, and then a large graded depolarization. OPCs did not show a substantial overshot beyond 0mV or repetitive firing (Fig. 4a). These properties differed significantly from pre-OL spikes, which displayed a distinct threshold and a depolarization peak reaching ~30mV (an all-or-none spike), and often exhibited repetitive firing (Fig. 4b). OPCs had a smaller Na+ current (159±26 vs. 290±27.2pA at 0mV, n=6 and 32, respectively, at 0mV), smaller capacitance (14±2.0 vs. 17±0.7pF, n=6 and 26, respectively; t-test, P =0.019), and larger input resistance (2.6±0.3 vs. 0.9±0.1GΩ, n=6 and 18, respectively; t-test, P <0.0001; Fig. 4c). In addition, the spike amplitude in OPCs gradually increased in response to larger current injections, whereas the spike amplitude in pre-OLs remained constant (Fig. 4a, b, d). Both pre-OLs and OPCs exhibited Nav-mediated currents, but their passive and active properties differed significantly.
The transient peak and sustained K+ currents in excitable pre-OLs were 2.2±0.42 and 0.6±0.03nA, respectively, in control conditions (n=9). Concomitant application of 2mM 4-aminopyridine (4-AP) and 10mM tetraethylammonium chloride (TEA-Cl) decreased the transient peak and sustained components to 0.6±0.08 and 0.4±0.09nA, respectively (n=6; P <0.001, Fig. 5a). In addition, excitable pre-OLs expressed a fast-activating and inactivating TTX-sensitive Na+ current but not a non-inactivating persistent Na+ current (Fig. 5a). Thus, excitable pre-OLs displayed 4-AP-sensitive K+ currents, sustained TEA-sensitive K+ currents, and TTX-sensitive Na+ currents underlying their AP firing.
To identify the Nav channel subtypes expressed in excitable pre-OLs, we examined their pharmacological and biophysical properties. We recorded voltage-activated Na+ currents (INa) using Cs-methanesulphonate internal solution in the presence of 4-AP (2mM), TEA (10mM) and cadmium (Cd, 200µM, a voltage-gated Ca2+ channel inhibitor). INa recorded in excitable pre-OLs were sensitive to µ-conotoxin KIIIA, an inhibitor of Nav1.2 channels in the CNS17, 18 (Fig. 5b). We next assessed the inactivation and activation kinetics of these currents, as this is one criteria used to classify Nav subtypes19, 20. The µ-conotoxin KIIIA–sensitive INa were activated and inactivated in a voltage-dependent manner from −40 to +40mV, with a peak amplitude of 241±24.1pA at 0mV (n=11, Fig. 5c, d). In an inactivation curve fit by the Boltzmann function, the half-values of the voltage dependence of activation and inactivation were V a=−23.6±3.2mV (n=7) and V h=−53.0±4.2mV (n=10, Fig. 5e), respectively. These results were similar to values previously reported for the Nav1.2 channel subtype in excitable cells (V a=−24mV, V h=−53mV20).
In excitable pre-OLs, µ-conotoxin KIIIA completely inhibited Na+ currents and AP firing (Fig. 5f, g), suggesting that the INa mediated by Nav1.2 channels underlies pre-OL excitability. Post-recording immunostaining revealed that these excitable pre-OLs expressed Nav1.2 and CNPase (Fig. 5h). CNPase+ pre-OLs predominantly expressed Nav1.2 in their somatic membrane and processes, which are often apposed to neuronal soma, but did not express other subtypes of Nav such as Nav1.6, expressed exclusively in the axons of MNTB neurons (Supplementary Fig. 4). Taken together, these results indicated that Nav1.2 is the major Nav subtype that is functionally expressed and required for firing APs in excitable pre-OLs.
We next sought to understand how Nav1.2 channels generate spikes in excitable pre-OLs under physiological conditions. We found that excitable pre-OLs have functional AMPA receptors (AMPARs) and glutamate-mediated currents. In voltage-clamp recordings of excitable pre-OLs, local glutamate application (1mM) triggered an inward current (80.9±10.6pA; n=5) that was significantly reduced in the presence of CNQX (AMPAR blocker, 100μM; 21.9±2.4pA; n=5; ANOVA, P<0.0001). The remaining inward current was completely abolished by additional application of the Ca2+-permeable AMPAR antagonist 1-Naphthyl acetyl spermine trihydrochloride (Naspm, 2.6±4.5pA; n=5; ANOVA, P<0.0001, Fig. 6a, b), indicating that excitable pre-OLs have both Ca2+-permeable and Ca2+-impermeable AMPAR. Next, we tested whether these glutamate-mediated currents could depolarize pre-OLs to reach spike threshold. In current-clamp recordings at approximately −80mV, local glutamate application depolarized pre-OLs by 49.0±7.8mV (from −80mV to approximately –35mV, n=5) and initiated a spike burst (Fig. 6c). Both the depolarization and the spike bursts were inhibited by CNQX (depolarization by 16.0±7.8mV; n=4; ANOVA, P<0.0001) and additional application of Naspm (1.5±3.0mV; n=4; ANOVA, P<0.0001, Fig. 6c, d). These results demonstrated that AMPAR-dependent glutamate-mediated currents could depolarize excitable pre-OLs enough to fire spikes.
Based on this observation, we next asked where glutamate originates to stimulate pre-OLs under physiological conditions. We found that pre-OLs in the MNTB formed a synaptic interaction with surrounding axons and received glutamatergic inputs from axons. Excitable pre-OLs (CNPase-eGFP+/Nav1.2+ cells) had thin processes that attached to and aligned with nearby axon fibers (Fig. 6e). Axonal stimulation evoked AMPAR-mediated excitatory postsynaptic currents (32.3±11.4pA; n=8 cells). These synaptic currents were completely blocked by CNQX (Fig. 6f), indicating that excitable pre-OLs receive glutamatergic synaptic inputs from surrounding axons during neuronal activity. In current-clamp recordings, axon fiber stimulation (100Hz, 1s) resulted in membrane depolarization of pre-OLs from −80 to −30mV and induced spike firing, followed by a slow return to the resting potential (Fig. 6g). The application of µ-conotoxin KIIIA completely blocked these pre-OL spikes, indicating that the spikes were driven by Nav1.2 currents. Slow depolarization induced by axonal simulation was mostly inhibited by CNQX (Fig. 6g), suggesting that neuronal activity-dependent glutamatergic inputs on excitable pre-OLs could induce pre-OL spikes.
To test whether pre-OL excitability is temporally required for initial myelination during postnatal development, we examined changes in excitable pre-OL populations in the MNTB from P5 to P62 using specific markers (n=3 slices in each of five animals per age group). Excitable pre-OLs expressed CNPase and Nav1.2 channels (Nav1.2+/CNPase+; Fig. 7a). At P5, a number of NG2+ cells (OPCs), but few CNPase+ cells (pre-OLs), were observed in the MNTB. CNPase+/Nav1.2+ cells (excitable pre-OLs) started to appear at P7 and constituted ~20–50% of total CNPase+ cells (total pre-OLs) at P9 and P13. As the number of pre-OLs increased from P9 to P13, NG2+ cells (OPCs) were conversely reduced in number. Interestingly, the population of CNPase+/Nav1.2+ cells was sustained later in development (P31) and into adulthood (P62; Fig. 7b). Moreover, at P19−P22, CNPase+/Nav1.2+cells exhibited a substantial INa (peak 199±15.7pA, n=6) as well as AP firing (Fig. 7c). This result indicated that a subpopulation of CNPase+ pre-OLs, displaying functional Nav1.2 currents and maintaining their ability to fire APs, is present in the MNTB throughout development and into adulthood.
To evaluate the function of Nav1.2-driven spikes in excitable pre-OLs in the MNTB, we induced a knockdown of the Nav1.2 channel specifically in CNPase+ pre-OLs. We used an adenovirus expressing a small hairpin RNA (shRNA) against rat Nav1.2 in the CNPase-eGFP vector and injected it into the MNTB. We tested two shRNAs (shRNA1 and 2) against rat Nav1.2 with different binding sites to rule out any nonspecific effect of the virus carrying the shRNA. In vector-only controls, 38.8±4.6% of cells were positive for both CNPase-eGFP and Nav1.2. In the group injected with shRNA1, the population of double-positive cells was reduced to 9.9%±1.2%, indicating an shRNA effectiveness of ~74.3% (Fig. 8a and Supplementary Fig. 5). In addition, we confirmed that the CNPase-eGFP virus restricted GFP expression specifically to OLs, and that the shRNA was under control of the CNPase promoter (Supplementary Fig. 6). The knockdown of Nav1.2 did not alter the number of CNPase+cells compared with control, although the knockdown induced significant morphological and structural changes in the pre-OLs. The alignment of pre-OLs surrounding the axons was altered, and the number of processes was reduced (Fig. 8a). The shRNA-infected pre-OLs did not display Nav1.2-mediated Na+ currents or APs (n=25 cells from shRNA1-infected cells, and n=10 cells from five shRNA2-infected cells, Supplementary Fig. 5). To rule out any shRNA toxicity effect, we used a scrambled shRNA. After 3D reconstruction of CNPase-eGFP+ cells in control, scrambled shRNA, and the two shRNA knockdown models (shRNA1 and 2), we quantified cell volume, soma size and total length of processes. There was no significant difference in these three aspects between control and scrambled shRNA-infected cells, and thus the scrambled shRNA-infected cells had morphological characteristics similar to those of the control. Pre-OLs in which Nav1.2 was knocked down (shRNA1 and shRNA2-infected cells) had a smaller cell volume (1188±115.9µm3 in control and 1242±56.9µm3 in scrambled vs. 875.9±65.36µm3 in shRNA1 and 869.6±63.12µm3 in shRNA2; ANOVA, P =0.0001, n=24, 27, 25 and 27, respectively, Fig. 8b, c). The lengths of processes were also significantly reduced upon Nav1.2 knockdown in both shRNA1 and shRNA2-infected cells (252±31.9µm and 181±14.2µm in control and scrambled vs. 147±16.1µm and 79±7.8µm in shRNA1 and shRNA2; ANOVA, P =0.0001, n=24, 27, 25, and 27, Fig. 8b, d). There was no significant difference in the soma diameter (10±0.4µm and 11±0.4µm in control and scrambled vs. 10±0.2µm and 11±0.4µm in shRNA1 and shRNA2; ANOVA, n=24, 27, 25 and 27, Fig. 8b, e). Taken together, these results demonstrated that the knockdown of Nav1.2 altered the morphological development of pre-OLs, which are in the critical stage preceding myelination.
We thus examined the Nav1.2 knockdown effect on myelin production in the brainstem. To quantify the expression level of MBP, we performed immunostaining and western blot in the scrambled shRNA- and shRNA2-infected brainstems. After confocal imaging, the fluorescence intensity of MBP in the local area surrounding of CNPase-GFP+ cells was quantified. Although MBP expression was seen in CNPase-GFP+ cells in both scrambled shRNA and shRNA2-infected brainstems, the intensity of MBP was significantly reduced in the shRNA2-infected brainstem (n=23 individual areas in scrambled vs n=22 in shRNA2, Fig. 9a, b). In addition, western blot analysis demonstrated that MBP level was considerably decreased in shRNA2-infected brainstems compared to scrambled shRNA-infected groups (n=4 in scrambled vs n=7 in shRNA2, Fig. 9c, d). Thus, Nav1.2 channels in pre-OLs are potentially involved in the formation of myelination. Overall, our results suggested that functional Nav1.2 channels are necessary for proper development of pre-OL processes and elaboration of the connecting structures between pre-OLs and axons, ultimately impacting compact myelination.
Our study demonstrates that a subpopulation of pre-OLs, beyond the OPC stage, display functional Na+ currents sufficient to generate APs under physiological conditions in the MNTB of the rat auditory brainstem. Nav1.2-mediated excitability is required for pre-OLs to form and extend their processes, which facilitate proper contacts with axons for myelination. These findings indicate that the excitability of pre-OLs is important during OL maturation and axon myelination in the brainstem.
In the rat auditory brainstem, excitable pre-OLs exhibit APs with a discrete threshold of approximately −37mV, an amplitude of ~110mV, and an AP peak reaching ~30mV. All-or-none APs in excitable cells are well characterized, having a threshold near −40mV, a depolarizing AP peak that approaches the equilibrium potential for Na+ (ENa; ~50mV), and a pronounced repolarization21–24. On the basis of these criteria, the APs of excitable pre-OLs are bona fide APs, suggesting that a subpopulation of OLs beyond the precursor stage can generate Na+ current-mediated APs in the CNS.
NG2+ OPCs have been described as unique in glial development because of their excitability in the white matter and cortex; however, there is little agreement on their ability to fire APs1–3. From previous studies, there is a high degree of heterogeneity among OPCs with respect to passive and excitable properties including membrane resistance, capacitance and the amplitude of Na+ currents depending on brain area and reflecting their potent functional heterogeneity2, 3, 5, 8, 25, 26. In the MNTB, we found two classes of OPCs distinguished by the presence or absence of Na+ currents, as previously observed in the cerebellum and corpus callosum2. One class of OPCs exhibited Na+ currents and graded spikes with amplitudes that increased with increasing depolarization similar to OPCs in the visual cortex and corpus callosum3, 8. In the MNTB, OPCs had a larger input resistance and smaller membrane capacitance, reflecting a smaller cell size and exhibited a much smaller INa compared with excitable pre-OLs (Fig. 4). These differences in the physiological properties and the biophysical parameters of Na+ currents may underlie the less effective firing in OPCs.
Although excitable properties of pre-OLs in the MNTB differed from those of OPCs, both stages were comprised of two different subpopulations depending on the presence of INa. This raises the possibility that excitable pre-OLs are derived from the class of excitable OPCs and conserve their excitability during differentiation and maturation. Previous studies suggested that OPC excitability rapidly decrease during the transition from OPCs to pre-OLs, and then finally disappear upon OL maturation4, 8. Here, the number of OPCs began to decrease at ~P7, whereas the population of excitable pre-OLs started to increase at ~P7, reached their peak at P13, and were maintained at a constant proportion into the beginning of adulthood (P31–P62). These results suggest that excitable pre-OLs do not have an ephemeral fate but rather functionally persist at least through the juvenile stage.
The presence of excitable pre-OLs throughout postnatal development raises the issue of their physiological role. One potential role is to regulate the structural maturation of OLs, because loss of their excitability in the Nav1.2 knockdown reduced glial processes and axon-glial synapses. Excitable pre-OLs are sensitive to neuronal activity and inputs. Thus, oligodendroglial excitability may mediate neuronal activity-dependent maturation of OL lineage cells and promote myelination during development27, 28. Unexpectedly, the majority of the CNPase-eGFP+ pre-OLs were affected by Nav1.2 knockdown, suggesting that Nav1.2 knockdown seems to have a broad effect on the population of shRNA-infected CNPase+ cells. We ruled out shRNA-related toxic effects and off-target effects using scrambled shRNA and two shRNAs targeting Nav1.2 at different sites. One possible explanation for the widespread effect of shRNA is that non-excitable OLs originally have Nav1.2 but rapidly lose the functional Nav1.2 channels during maturation. During OL differentiation, non-excitable pre-OLs may lose Nav1.2 channels and then rapidly proceed to myelination, whereas excitable pre-OLs with Nav1.2 channels may stay longer in the pre-myelination stage, not proceeding to myelination4, 8. Thus, the injection of a Nav1.2-specific shRNA at an early stage (P3) could impact Nav1.2 channel functions, i.e., increasing and extending processes, in both excitable and non-excitable pre-OLs. We did not find distinguishable Nav currents and APs in non-excitable OLs; therefore, another possible explanation is that non-excitable pre-OLs may have too few Nav1.2 channels to generate distinct inward currents and APs. Thus, the presence of Nav1.2 in non-excitable pre-OLs may not contribute appreciably to their physiological properties or excitability, but the genetic modification of Nav1.2 could have sufficient effects on structural properties in non-excitable pre-OLs.
Yet another possibility is that excitable pre-OLs directly provide a critical signal to surrounding neurons and glia for maintaining axonal integrity and metabolism29. Nav1.2-mediated excitability may facilitate the paracrine effects of excitable-OLs on neighboring cells including non-excitable pre-OLs and axons. OPCs derived from embryonic stem cells secrete proteins (e.g., brain-derived neurotrophic factor) with the potential roles of enhancing neuronal survival and promoting axonal regeneration30. These neurotrophic factors could affect the maturation of both excitable and non-excitable pre-OLs31. A previous study using mutant mice lacking CNPase, displaying marked axonal swelling and progressive axonal loss, revealed that this axon pathology was due to loss of unknown signaling between OLs and axons32. This study suggests that OLs secrete signaling molecules to neighboring cells, including axons and glia. Additionally, CNPase+ OLs are electrically coupled among each other via gap junction channels, suggesting an important role of the inter-oligodendrocytic communication in myelin formation33. Excitable pre-OLs might provide a similar type of chemical and electrical signaling to facilitate maturation of surrounding pre-OLs. Therefore, loss of Nav1.2 in excitable pre-OLs could influence maturation of neighboring OLs including non-excitable pre-OLs.
In addition to the inter-oligodendrocytic communication, excitable pre-OLs could directly communicate with axons. Synaptic inputs from axons to OPCs have been found in the cerebellum, corpus callosum and cerebral cortex4, 6, 8, 25. OPCs express functional glutamate receptors and transporters and display AMPA/kainate receptor−mediated synaptic currents34–38. Here, we demonstrated physical and functional interactions between neurons and excitable pre-OLs, representing a more mature stage beyond OPCs. In the brainstem, excitable pre-OLs received glutamatergic inputs from surrounding axons or synapses and predominantly exhibited AMPA/kainate receptor−mediated currents, similar to OPCs in the cerebellum or hippocampus39. Brief stimulation of axon fibers can trigger synchronized synaptic currents in pre-OLs but may not recruit enough axons to provide sufficient glutamate for pre-OL depolarization. Under prolonged axonal stimulation or glutamate application, excitable pre-OLs showed Nav1.2-driven spikes, followed by slow and sustained depolarization mediated by AMPAR activation. There was a temporal delay between axonal stimulation and the onset of membrane depolarization. One possible explanation is that after strong stimulation, glutamate spillover from surrounding axons and synapses activates AMPARs and depolarizes pre-OLs. Another possibility is the presence of axonal activity-dependent volume transmission as well as rapid synaptic communication between axons and pre-OLs40, 41. Subsequently, the membrane potential reaches a threshold, and excitable pre-OLs are able to generate spikes. The slower non-synaptic communication mediated by glutamate has been observed previously, inducing a Ca2+ response that had an average time to peak of 25±5.7s after stimulation41. Another explanation is that the field stimulation can cause synchronous activation of axons and profound depolarization of surrounding glia, which increases extracellular K+ 42. As a result, there may be a wave of depolarization, upon which these spikes are indirectly induced. Under physiological conditions, the calyx of Held axons can routinely fire and propagate APs of >600Hz; thus, the axon stimulation at 100Hz is considered physiological.
It remains unclear why immature OLs from the same lineage develop differently in different brain regions and show distinct properties of excitability in the auditory nervous system. In the auditory brainstem, the number and length of processes were reduced by Nav1.2 knockdown in pre-OLs in both the MNTB and the midline region, where the heavily myelinated afferent fibers cross over. Thus, oligodendroglial Nav1.2 function is primarily associated with OL maturation and myelination in the auditory brainstem. In addition, we predict that in the MNTB, which is a synapse-rich area, the encompassing structures of pre-OLs surrounding the calyx synapses may contribute substantially to synaptic function. Satellite OLs, which are closely apposed to the neuronal soma, are involved in rapid uptake of extracellular K+ and assist neuronal high-frequency activity42. In the auditory brainstem, the excitability of OLs may be necessary for the temporal fidelity of auditory signals, which is a key element for the development of auditory processes and requires a high density of OLs and compact myelination43. During the last decade, different physiological properties and functions of OLs have been demonstrated depending on developmental stage and brain area. Considering the heterogeneity of OL lineage cells, our results contribute to our understanding of the physiology and function of immature OLs in the auditory brainstem.
All procedures were carried out in accordance with National Institutes of Health guidelines and approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio.
Transverse brainstem slices (200μm thick) were prepared from Sprague-Dawley rats at P5−P62, representing different time points in OL development. After rapid decapitation, the brainstem was quickly removed from the skull and immersed in ice-cold low-calcium artificial cerebrospinal fluid (aCSF) containing: 125mM NaCl, 2.5mM KCl, 3mM MgCl2, 0.1mM CaCl2, 25mM glucose, 25mM NaHCO3, 1.25mM NaH2PO4, 0.4mM ascorbic acid, 3mM myoinositol and 2mM Na-pyruvate, pH 7.3–7.4 when bubbled with carbogen (95% O2/5% CO2), and 310–320mOsmol/l. The brainstem was cut and the slices transferred to an incubation chamber containing normal aCSF bubbled with carbogen, in which they were maintained for 30min at 35°C and thereafter at room temperature (≤25°C). Normal aCSF was the same as low-calcium (slicing) aCSF, but with 1mM MgCl2 and 2mM CaCl2. Sagittal slices of cerebellum (200μm thick) were prepared from P9−P14 Sprague-Dawley rat pups using the same protocol.
Whole-cell patch-clamp recordings were performed in normal aCSF at room temperature (22–24°C) using an EPC-10 amplifier (HEKA Elektronik) controlled by Patchmaster software. Voltage-clamp and current-clamp recordings of K+ currents and APs, respectively, were carried out using a pipette solution containing: 130mM K-gluconate, 20mM KCl, 5mM Na2-phosphocreatine, 10mM HEPES, 4mM Mg-ATP, 0.2mM EGTA and 0.3mM GTP, pH 7.3 (adjusted with KOH). Voltage-clamp recordings to measure INa were carried out using a pipette solution containing: 130mM Cs-methanesulphonate, 10mM CsCl, 5mM Na2-phosphocreatine, 10mM HEPES, 4mM Mg-ATP, 5mM EGTA, 10mM TEA-HCl and 0.3mM GTP, pH 7.3 (adjusted with CsOH). Pipettes were pulled using an electrode puller (Model P-1000, Sutter Instruments) to open tip resistances of 5−6MΩ. In all whole-cell recordings, Alexa 568 (40µM; Invitrogen) was included in the pipette solution for post-recording labeling. Drugs used to induce or block synaptic currents included glutamate (1mM; Sigma), CNQX (6-cyano-7-nitroquinoxaline-2,3-dione; 50µm; TOCRIS) and Naspm (1-naphthyl acetyl spermine; 50µm; TOCRIS).
Slices used for patch-clamp or fresh brainstem slices (~120µm) were fixed with 4% (w/v) paraformaldehyde in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) for 30min. Free-floating sections were blocked in 4% goat serum and 0.3% (w/v) Triton X-100 in PBS for 1h and then incubated with primary antibody overnight at 4°C. The following primary antibodies were used: mouse anti-CNPase (1:200; Sigma, C5922), mouse anti-O1 (1:500; Millipore, MAB5540), mouse anti-Nav1.2 (1:50; Neuromab, 75-024 Clone K69/3), mouse anti-PLP/DM20 (1:100; Thermo Fisher, MA180034), mouse anti-NeuN (1:200; Millipore, MAB377), rabbit anti-GFAP (1:500; DAKO, Z033429), guinea pig anti-vGluT1 (1:1000; Millipore, AB5905), rabbit anti-NG2 chondroitin sulphate proteoglycan (1:50; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, sc-20162), mouse anti-MBP (1:500; BioLegend, SMI-99P) and rabbit anti-Nav1.6 (1:200, Alamone, ASC-009). Tissues were then incubated with different Alexa-conjugated secondary antibodies (1:500; Invitrogen) for 2h at room temperature. After five rinses with PBS, slices were coverslipped using mounting medium with 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI; Vectashield; Vector Laboratories) to counterstain cell nuclei. Stained slices were viewed on a confocal laser-scanning microscope (Zeiss LSM-510 or Olympus IX81 Fluoview 1000) at 488, 568 and 633nm using a 40× or 60× oil-immersion objective.
Images of slices were acquired using a confocal microscope (IX81 Fluoview 1000) equipped with a 60× oil-immersion objective and appropriate filters for DAPI, Alexa 488 (Nav1.2), Alexa 568 (NG2) and Alexa 647 (CNPase). The oligodendroglial population was analyzed by capturing five random fields of the MNTB area (200×200×20µm) per coverslip. Four replicates of each experiment (P5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 31 and 62) were performed, each with three coverslips per group. Oligodendroglial cells were counted as described44. OLs that exhibited clear DAPI labeling with NG2 and CNPase or Nav1.2 and CNPase were counted as positive or double-positive cells.
A cDNA encoding the CNPase promoter sequence and the eGFP reporter gene (pAV.ExSi-CNPase promoter-eGFP) was produced and inserted into an adenovirus packaging vector. Briefly, the adenoviral vector was linearized and transfected into optimized packaging cells. Packaged virus was collected from infected cells and used to infect additional packaging cells to further amplify the virus. To assess the role of Nav1.2, we used an adenovirus with the same CNPase promoter sequence with an additional sequence encoding shRNA targeting the gene SCN2A (encoding the Nav1.2 channel) as well as an eGFP reporter (Supplementary Table 1). Adenovirus containing vector only (control), the scrambled shRNA, and shRNA1 and shRNA2 were injected into the MNTB in the auditory brainstem using stereotaxic injection. Adenoviruses carrying each of these plasmids were purchased from Cyagen Biosciences.
Sprague-Dawley rats were injected at P3 with the adenovirus carrying the appropriate plasmid in the MNTB. Rats were anaesthetized on ice (10min; to avoid harmful effects of isoflurane) and maintained one ice throughout the surgical procedure. The animals were placed in a stereotaxic frame (David Kopf Instruments), the scalp was opened, and the lambda relative to bregma was measured. Typical coordinates for injection were (in mm, from bregma) A/P –4.8, D/V –6.5, M/L 0.5. Adenovirus containing the appropriate plasmid (1μl at >1012 particles per ml) was injected unilaterally using a 30G injector (Plastics One) at a rate of 0.25µl/min. The needle was allowed to remain in place for 2min and then slowly removed. The scalp was glued using tissue adhesive (3M Vetbond), and all traces of blood were removed. Animals were removed from the stereotaxic frame and placed in clean cages under light at 37°C. After full recovery, rats were returned to their respective cages. Animals were killed (as describe in the slicing section) at 7–14 days after the injection to obtain brain slices.
Virus-infected brainstem slices (200μm), displaying CNPase-GFP+cells, were homogenized using a protein extraction buffer (ThermoFisher Scientific) as well as protease inhibitor cocktail. The lysates were incubated for 30min on ice and then centrifuged at 15,000r.p.m. for 30min at 4°C. Supernatants were collected and protein concentrations were estimated using a BCA protein assay kit (Thermo Scientific). Equal amounts of protein were resolved by 12% sodium dodecyl sulfate–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis gel and transferred onto polyvinylidine fluoride membrane. The membranes were blocked for 1h at room temperature and incubated overnight in primary antibody (MBP, 1:1000, BioLegend, SMI-99P and β-actin, 1:1000, Cell signaling, 8H10D10) at 4°C. Membranes were incubated with IR-conjugated secondary antibodies for 2h and scanned using Li-COR Odyssey IR imager. MBP band intensities were quantified and normalized to β-actin. Images of Western blots have been cropped for presentation. Full-size western blots with protein ladders (LI-COR, P/N 928-60000) are shown in Supplementary Fig. 7.
The authors declare that all data generated or analyzed in this study are available within the article and its Supplementary Information files. The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
We thank Drs Mazoor Bhat, David Morilak and Martin Paukert for valuable discussion and comments. This work was supported by a grant from the NIDCD (R01 DC03157) to J.H.K.
Conceptualization of the study by J.H.K. Design of the study and experiments by E.B. and J.H.K. Performance of the experiments and analysis of the data by E.B., T.B., J.X., E.D., E.J.K. and J.H.K. Writing of the manuscript E.B., T.B. and J.H.K.
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Electronic supplementary material
Supplementary Information accompanies this paper at doi:10.1038/s41467-017-00688-0.
Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.