PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of compcytogenPensoft PublishersAboutEditorial TeamAuthor GuidelinesSubmissionComparative Cytogenetics
 
Comp Cytogenet. 2017; 11(1): 119–128.
Published online 2017 March 6. doi:  10.3897/CompCytogen.v11i1.11152
PMCID: PMC5599699

Cytogenetic studies in the redtail catfish, Phractocephalus hemioliopterus (Bloch & Schneider, 1801) (Siluriformes, Pimelodidae) a giant fish from Amazon basin

Abstract

The objective of this study was to cytogenetically analyze Phractocephalus hemioliopterus comparing the findings with other data to infer relationships among Pimelodidae species. The results revealed a diploid number of 2n = 56 and the karyotype composed of 16 metacentric, 20 submetacentric, 6 subtelocentric and 14 acrocentric chromosomes (FN = 98). The Ag-NORs, 18S rDNA and CMA3 signals were coincident in location occupying the short arm of an acrocentric chromosome pair (23th), in a secondary constriction. The 5S rDNA genes were localized near the centromere on the short arms of one submetacentric chromosome pair. C-bands were localized predominantly in the terminal regions of chromosomes, including the AgNORs and a small metacentric pair with a conspicuous positive band on interstitial region. This chromosome pair could be considered a species-specific cytogenetic marker.

Keywords: Neotropical fish, Parrot catfish, karyotype, Ag-NORs, 18S rDNA, CMA3, C-banding

Introduction

The genus Phractocephalus Agassiz, 1829 belongs to Pimelodidae family and contains three species, one extant, Phractocephalus hemioliopterus (Bloch & Schneider, 1801) and two extinct species recently described, Phractocephalus nassi (Lundberg and Aguilera, 2003) and Phractocephalus acreornatus (Aguilera et al. 2008). According to Lundberg et al. (1998) “isolation of peripheral drainage system south, west and north of the Paraná, Amazonas and Orinoco systems provided opportunity for allopatric divergence, and also was accompanied by much extirpation of once more widespread tropical fish species”.

The large catfish, Phractocephalus hemioliopterus, has a wide distribution in the lowland, meandering rivers and lagoons of the Orinoco, Amazon and Essequibo (Lundberg and Aguilera 2003) and as a monotypic taxon possesses several uniquely derived characteristics (de Pinna 1998). This catfish is known as “cajaro” in Venezuela and Colombia and in Brazil as “pirarara” (parrot - fish) because of its red or orange caudal fin (Lundberg and Aguilera 2003). In the areas of occurrence, the species has economic importance and is much appreciated by fishermen. However, in spite of its large size, Phractocephalus is also a common aquarium fish (Carvalho and Medeiros 2005).

From a systematic point of view, Pimelodidae remains as a controversial group, possessing some internal inconsistencies, represented by the “Pimelodus group”, “Calophysus group” and a basal branch including three genera Phractocephalus, Leiarius Bleeker, 1862 and Perrunichthys Schultz, 1944 (Lundberg and Littman 2003).

Available cytogenetic data partially support this hypothesis because several chromosomal studies on Pimelodidae have revealed that the species of this family have a predominant diploid number of 56 (Table (Table1)1) with a few exceptions, such as species included in the “Calophysus group” that show some characteristic cytogenetic features as 2n = 50, reported in Calophysus Müller & Trosche, 1843, Luciopimelodus Eigenmann & Eigenmann, 1888 and Pinirampus Bleeker, 1858 (Ramirez-Gil et al. 1998, Swarça et al. 1999, Sanchez et al. 2010) and Megalonema platanum (Günther, 1880) with 2n = 54 (Carvalho et al. 2011). According to phylogenetic tree of Lundberg and Littman (2003) the branch that includes Leiarius, Perrunichthys and Phractocephalus has been never studied cytogenetically; this fact demonstrates that more species must be chromosomally studied to increase the number of cytogenetic data to better understand the species relationships and the karyotypic evolution in this fish group. The present work aims to report for the first time the cytogenetic study of Phractocephalus hemioliopterus, a unique extant species of the genus Phractocephalus from the Amazon Basin.

Table 1.
Cytogenetic data on the family Pimelodidae. 2n = diploid number. Only published data were used.

Material and methods

Six specimens of Phractocephalus hemioliopterus from Amazon Basin/Brazil maintained in the fishing farm of the Universidade Estadual de Londrina were studied cytogenetically. The chromosome preparations were obtained from lymphocyte culture according to Fenocchio and Bertollo (1988), avoiding the sacrifice of specimens. Silver staining of NORs (AgNORs) was performed using the method of Howell and Black (1980). C banding and Chromomycin A3 (CMA3) staining were carried out using the methods of Sumner (1972) and Verma and Babu (1995), respectively. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) experiments were performed using biotinylated 18S rDNA probes (1700 bp fragments) obtained from the nuclear DNA of the fish Oreochromis niloticus (Linnaeus, 1758) labeled with biotin-14-dATP by nick translation (Gibco cat Nº 18247-015), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The hybridization technique, post-hybridization washes and visualization were carried out following Swarça et al. (2001c). The preparations were analyzed in an Olympus BX50 microscope, and the best metaphases were captured with a SONY camera, model Exware HAD coupled to the microscope. The FISH slides were observed and the images acquired with a Leica DM 4500 microscope equipped with a DFC 300F9 camera and Leica IM50 4.0 software. Chromosome morphology was determined on the basis of Levan et al. (1964) and Guerra (1986) with some modifications and chromosomes were classified as metacentric (m), submetacentric (sm), subtelocentric (st) and acrocentric (a). NF (chromosome arm number) was determined considering m/sm/st chromosomes having two arms and acrocentric chromosomes having one arm.

Results and discussion

The family Pimelodidae is composed of 109 valid species (Eschmeyer and Fong 2016), but only 27 species have been analyzed cytogenetically (Swarça et al. 2007). Phractocephalus is a monotypic genus. The only species of the genus, Phractocephalus hemioliopterus, is widely distributed in the rivers of the Orinoco, Amazon and Essequibo basins (Lundberg and Aguilera 2003). The extinction of the other two species (Phractocephalus nassi and Phractocephalus acreornatus) was hypothetically explained by Lundberg et al. (1998).

The diploid number (2n = 56) and karyotype constitution, 16m, 20sm, 6st, 14a (FN = 98) of Phractocephalus hemioliopterus is reported for the first time (Fig. (Fig.1).1). According to Swarça et al. (2000) the chromosome number is identical to other large species that belong to the “Pimelodus group” comprising at least Hemisorubim Bleeker, 1862, Zungaro Bleeker, 1858, Sorubim Cuvier, 1829, Pseudoplatystoma Bleeker, 1862 that could be called informally “Sorubiminae group” and includes the largest catfishes from South America (de Pinna 1998, Lundberg and Littman 2003) (Table (Table1).1). Although Phractocephalus hemioliopterus does not belong to these systematic and/or taxonomic groups, this species shares many cytogentic traits, such as the chromosome shape, size and staining patterns, with the species included in “Sorubiminae”.

Figure 1.
Karyotype of Phractocephalus hemioliopterus. Conventional Giemsa staining. Scale bar: 5 µm.

As stated below, diploid number 56 with high fundamental number, NORs located at the terminal position on the short arm of an acrocentric chromosome pair (23th), coincident with positive C-bands (Fig. (Fig.2a)2a) represent common features in almost all pimelodid species analyzed so far, suggesting that these cytogenetic traits were conserved during the karyotype evolution and may have an ancient common origin (Sanchez et al. 2010). The presence of ribosomal genes on the short arm of one st/a chromosome pair is coincident with the location observed in the “Calophysus group” (Sánchez et al. 2010) and “Sorubiminae group” (Swarça et al. 2008) and differs from the “Pimelodus group”, where the ribosomal genes are located almost exclusively on the long arm of m/sm chromosome pairs (Swarça et al. 2007).

Figure 2.
Metaphases of Phractocephalus hemioliopterus a AgNO3 staining b CMA3 banding c FISH with 18S rDNA probe and d FISH with 5S rDNA probe. Arrows indicate the NOR-bearing chromosomes and arrowheads indicate the chromosome pair with 5S rDNA.

The data obtained with CMA3 indicate that the Ag-NORs of Phractocephalus hemioliopterus are rich in GC pairs (Fig. (Fig.2b),2b), a general pattern also found in the family Pimelodidae by several authors (Swarça et al. 2001a, b, c, Garcia and Moreira-Filho 2005, Swarça et al. 2005b, Nirchio et al. 2013, among others). However, the exact location of ribosomal genes on chromosomes could be revealed exclusively by means of in situ hybridization using 18S and 5S rDNA probes. After application of this procedure these regions showed bright signals on short arms of one subtelocentric pair (18S rDNA probe) and on short arms of another submetacentric chromosome pair (5S rDNA probe) (Fig. 2c, d). In general, the 18S and 5S rDNA sites are not syntenic but located on different chromosome pairs, this feature being the most frequent patter in several Pimelodidae species (Carvalho et al. 2010, Swarça et al. 2008, 2009). However, recently syntenic localization of the major rDNA clusters and the 5S sites were reported in other species (Ziemniczak et al. 2012, Konerat et al. 2014, da Rocha et al. 2016). So far, both patterns of rDNA and 5S rDNA localization, syntenic and not syntenic, have been described in Pimelodidae. Still, the evolutionary trend of ribosomal genes chromosome distribution has not been yet outlined.

Heterochromatin distribution revealed by C-banding was evidenced on telomeric regions of some chromosomes, one pair with bitelomeric bands and in the secondary constriction on the short arm of NOR bearing pair (Fig. (Fig.3).3). This last feature represents a common trait shared by most pimelodids. Another interesting cytogenetic characteristic is the presence of a small metacentric pair that shows a conspicuous heterochromatic block in interstitial region (Fig. (Fig.3).3). Heterochromatin interstitially located has been reported in some species of the family Pimelodidae, such as Pseudoplatystoma tigrinum (Valenciennes, 1840) (Fenocchio and Bertollo 1992), Hemisorubim platyrhynchos (Valenciennes, 1840) (Martins-Santos et al. 1996), Iheringichthys labrosus (Lütken, 1874) (Vissotto et al. 1999) and also in species of the genus Pimelodus Lacépède, 1803 (Treco et al. 2008). The interstitial localization of a strong C-band in Phractocephalus hemioliopterus on a small metacentric chromosome can be a species-specific cytogenetic marker and could be useful for future studies on the internal relationships of the species included in this group.

Figure 3.
Somatic metaphase of Phractocephalus hemioliopterus after C-banding. Arrowheads indicate the chromosome pair with interstitial heterochromatin; arrows indicate the NOR-bearing chromosome and asterisks indicate the chromosomes with heterochromatin blocks ...

Taking into consideration the findings described previously, the present work is the first to provide cytogenetic information about Phractocephalus hemioliopterus

The cytogenetic description of Phractocephalus hemioliopterus allowed the karyotypic characterization and the comparison of certain cytogenetic features shared in general with other Pimelodidae, however, some of these traits distinguish the “Sorubiminae group”, suggesting that this species could be integrated into the branch of the great catfishes.

Notes

Citation

Swarça AC, Dias AL, Fenocchio AS (2017) Cytogenetic studies in the redtail catfish, Phractocephalus hemioliopterus (Bloch & Schneider, 1801) (Siluriformes, Pimelodidae) a giant fish from Amazon basin. Comparative Cytogenetics 11(1): 119–128. https://doi.org/10.3897/CompCytogen.v11i1.11152

References

  • Aguilera O, Bocquentin J, Lundberg JG, Maciente A. (2008) A new cajaro catfish (Siluriformes: Pimelodidae: Phractocephalus) from the Late Miocene of Southwestern Amazonia and its relationship to †Phractocephalus nassi of the Urumaco Formation. Paläeontologische Zeitschrift 82: 231–245. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02988412
  • Borin LA, Martins-Santos IC. (2002) Cytogenetic aspects in species of the genus Pimelodus (Pisces, Siluriformes, Pimelodidae) of the river Paraná Basin. Cytologia 67: 199–204. https://doi.org/10.1508/cytologia.67.199
  • Borin LA, Martins-Santos IC. (2004) Study on karyotype and occurrence of B chromosomes in two endemic species of the genus Pimelodus (Siluriformes, Pimelodidae) from the river Iguaçu. Hereditas 140: 201–209. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-5223.2004.01812.x [PubMed]
  • Carvalho AR, Medeiros ER. (2005) Levantamento socioeconômico e da composição de espécies entre os turistas que praticam a pesca recreativa no rio Araguaia, região de Aruanã. Revista Saúde e Ambiente, Joinville 6: 23–31.
  • Carvalho RA, Giuliano-Caetano L, Dias AL. (2004) Cytogenetic Analysis of A- and B- Chromosomes of Iheringichthys labrosus (Pisces, Pimelodidae) from the Tibagi River, Paraná, Brazil. Cytologia 69: 381–385. https://doi.org/10.1508/cytologia.69.381
  • Carvalho RA, Dias AL. (2005) Cytogenetic characterization of B chromosomes in two populations of Iheringichthys labrosus (Pisces, Pimelodidae) from the Capivara Reservoir (Parana, Brazil). Caryologia 58: 269–273. https://doi.org/10.1080/00087114.2005.10589462
  • Carvalho RA, Laudicina A, Giuliano-Caetano L, Martins-Santos IC, Dias AL. (2010) Cytogenetic analysis of the 18S, 5S rDNA and B chromosome of Iheringichthys labrosus (Lütken, 1874) (Siluriformes, Pimelodidae). Brazilian Journal of Biology 70: 631–636. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1519-69842010000300021 [PubMed]
  • Carvalho RA, Sanchez S, Swarça AC, Fenocchio AS, Martins-Santos IC, Dias AL. (2011) Chromosomal analyses in Megalonema platanum (Siluriformes: Pimelodidae), an endangered species from South American rivers. Neotropical Ichthyology 9: 177–182. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1679-62252011005000008
  • Da Rocha RH, Baumgärtner L, Paiz LM, Margarido VP, Fernandes CA, Gubiani EA. (2016) An uncommon co-localization of rDNA 5S with major rDNA clusters in Callichthyidae (Siluriformes): a report case in Corydoras carlae Nijssen & Isbrücker, 1983. Comparative Cytogenetics 10: 603–613. https://doi.org/10.3897/CompCytogen.v10i4.9507 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • De Pinna MCC. (1998) Phylogenetic relationships of Neotropical Siluriformes (Teleostei, Ostariophysi): Historical overview and synthesis of hypotheses. In: Malabarba LR, Reis RE, Vari RP, Lucena ZM, Lucena CAS (Eds) Philogeny and Classification of Neotropical Fishes. Porto Alegre, Edipucrs, 603 pp.
  • Dias AL, Foresti F. (1993) Cytogenetic studies on fishes of the family Pimelodidae (Siluroidei). Revista Brasileira de Genética 16: 585–600.
  • Eschmeyer WN, Fong JD.: Species by Family/Subfamily in the Catalogue of Fishes. http://researcharchive.calacademy.org/research/ichthyology/catalog/SpeciesByFamily.asp [accessed 16. august 2016]
  • Fenocchio AS, Bertollo LAC. (1988) A simple method for fresh-water fish lymphocyte culture. Brazilian Journal of Genetics 11: 847–852.
  • Fenocchio AS, Bertollo LAC. (1992) Karyotype similarities among Pimelodidae (Pisces, Siluriformes) from the Brazilian Amazon region. Cytobios 69: 41–46. [PubMed]
  • Garcia C, Moreira-Filho O. (2005) Cytogenetical analyses in three fish species of the genus Pimelodus (Siluriformes: Pimelodidae) from Rio São Francisco: Considerations about the karyotypical evolution in the genus. Neotropical Ichthyology 3: 285–289. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1679-62252005000200006
  • Gonçalves ALM, Prado FD, Ferreira DC, Voltolin TA, Senhorini JA, Foresti F, Porto-Foresti F. (2014) First cytogenetic characterization of the giant Amazonian catfish Brachyplatystoma filamentosum (Siluriformes, Pimelodidae). Caryologia 67: 101–105. https://doi.org/10.1080/00087114.2014.931629
  • Guerra MS. (1986) Reviewing the chromosome nomenclature of Levan et al. Brazilian Journal of Genetics 9: 741–743.
  • Howell WM, Black DA. (1980) Controlled silver-staining of nucleolar organizer regions with a protective colloidal developer: a one-step method. Experientia 36: 1014–1015. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01953855 [PubMed]
  • Konerat JT, Bueno V, Martins-Santos IC, Margarido VP. (2014) Karyotipic diversity and chromosome evolution in the armored catfishes Callichthyinae (Siluriformes, Callichthyidae). Caryologia 67: 140–148. https://doi.org/10.1080/00087114.2014.931635
  • Levan A, Fredga K, Sandberg AA. (1964) Nomenclature for centromeric position on chromosomes. Hereditas 52: 201–220. https://doi.org/10.11/j.1601 5223.1964.tb01953.x
  • Lundberg JG, Aguilera O. (2003) The late Miocene Phractocephalus catfish (Siluriformes, Pimelodidae) from Uramaco, Venezuela: additional specimens and reinterpretation as a distinct species. Neotropical Ichthyology 1: 97–109. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1679-62252003000200004
  • Lundberg JG, Littmann MW. (2003) Siluriformes: Family Pimelodidae - long-whiskered catfishes. In: Kullander S, Reis R, Ferraris C. (Eds) Check List of Freshwater Fishes of South and Central America. Porto Alegre, Edipucrs, 437–452.
  • Lundberg JG, Marshall LG, Guerrero BH, Malabarba MC, Wesselingh F. (1998) The stage for Neotropical Fish Diversification: A History of Tropical South America Rivers. In: Malabarba LR, Reis RE, Vari RP, Lucena ZM, Lucena CAS. (Eds) Phylogeny and Classification of Neotropical Fishes. Porto Alegre, Edipucrs, 13–48.
  • Martins-Santos IC, Julio Jr HF, Burin I. (1996) Karyotypic studies of four species of the Sorubiminae subfamily (Pisces, Siluriformes). Caryologia 49: 73–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/00087114.1996.10797352
  • Moraes-Neto A, Silva MD, Matoso DA, Vicari MR, Almeida MC, Collares-Pereira MJ, Artoni RF. (2011) Karyotype variability in Neotropical catfishes of the family Pimelodidae (Teleostei: Siluriformes). Neotropical Ichthyological 9: 97–105. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1679-62252011005000002
  • Nirchio M, Mujica A, Oliveira C, Granado A, Mora J, Hett AK. (2013) Pseudoplatystoma metaense and P. orinocoense (Siluriformes: Pimelodidae) from the Orinoco Basin, Venezuela: cytogenetic and molecular analyses. Italian Journal of Zoology 80: 526–535. https://doi.org/10.1080/11250003.2013.840339
  • Ramirez-Gil H, Feldberg E, Almeida-Val VMF, Val AL. (1998) Karyological, biochemical, and physiological aspects of Callophysus macropterus (Siluriformes, Pimelodidae) from the Solimões and Negro Rivers (Central Amazon). Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research 31: 1449–1458. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-879X1998001100014 [PubMed]
  • Ribeiro LB, Matoso DA, Almeida MC, Vicari MR, Moraes-Neto A, Svidnicki MC, Artoni RF. (2008) Karyotypic variability in Iheringichthys labrosus (Teleostei, Pimelodidae) from the Tibagi River basin (Paraná State, Brazil). Genetics and Molecular Research 7: 718–724. https://doi.org/10.4238/vol7-3gmr456 [PubMed]
  • Sanchez S, Swarça AC, Fenocchio AS. (2010) Cytogenetic Studies and Evolutive Considerations in Species of the Calophysus Group (Siluriformes, Pimelodinae). Cytologia 75: 223–227. https://doi.org/10.1508/cytologia.75.223
  • Sanchez S, Swarça AC, Fenocchio AS. (2014) Cytogenetics analyses among populations of the fish Iheringichtys labrosus (Kröyer, 1874) (Siluriformes, Pimelodidae). Karyotype analysis, C- banding and AgRONs distribution. Brazilian Journal of Biology 74: 212–216. https://doi.org/10.1590/1519-6984.13212 [PubMed]
  • Schell JJ. (1973) Fish Chromosomes and their Evolution. Interval Report of Danmarks Akvarium, Charlottelund, Denmark.
  • Souza L, Giuliano-Caetano L, Dias AL. (2003) Karyotipic Study of three species of Pimelodus (Pisces, Pimelodidae) from the Paraguai River Basin. Cytologia 68: 345–350. https://doi.org/10.1508/cytologia.68.345
  • Souza L, Swarça AC, Dias AL. (2004a) Analysis of the nucleolus organizer regions in 5 species of the genus Pimelodus (Siluriformes, Pimelodidae), using AgNO3, CMA3 and FISH with the 18S rDNA probe. Caryologia 57: 144–150. https://doi.org/10.1080/00087114.2004.10589384
  • Souza L, Swarça AC, Dias AL. (2004b) Banding chromosome pattern of two species of Pimelodus (Siluriformes, Pimelodidae) from the Paraná river basin of Brazil. Folia Biologica Krakow 52: 165–169. https://doi.org/10.3409/fb57_1-2.43-48 [PubMed]
  • Sumner AT. (1972) A simple technique for demonstrating centromeric heterochromatin. Experimental Cell Research 75: 304–306. https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-4827(72)90558-7 [PubMed]
  • Swarça AC, Giuliano-Caetano L, Dias AL. (1999) Cytogenetic characterization through chromosomic banding of Pinirampus pirinampu (Pisces, Pimelodidae) from the Tibagi river basin PR/Brazil. Caryologia 52: 31–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/00087114.1998.10589151
  • Swarça AC, Giuliano-Caetano L, Dias AL. (2000) Cytogenetics of species of the families Pimelodidae and Rhamdiidae (Siluriformes). Genetics and Molecular Biology 23: 589–593. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1415-47572000000300015
  • Swarça AC, Giuliano-Caetano L, Vanzella ALL, Dias AL. (2001a) Polymorphism of rRNA genes in Pinirampus pirinampu (Pisces, Pimelodidae) detected by in situ hybridization. Cytologia 66: 275–278. https://doi.org/10.1508/cytologia.66.275
  • Swarça AC, Giuliano-Caetano L, Dias AL. (2001b) Analyses of nucleolus organizer regions and heterochromatin of Pimelodus maculatus (Pisces, Pimelodidae). Genetica 110: 97–100. https://doi.org/10.3409/fb56_1-2.31-35 [PubMed]
  • Swarça AC, Cestari MM, L. Giuliano-Caetano L, Dias AL. (2001c) Cytogenetic characterization of the large south American Siluriform fish species Zungaro zungaro (Pisces, Pimelodidae). Chromosome Science 5: 51–55.
  • Swarça AC, Fenocchio AS, Cestari MM, Dias AL. (2005a) First chromosome data on Steindachneridion scripta (Pisces, Siluriformes, Pimelodidae) from Brazilian Rivers: Giemsa, CBG, G- and RE banding. Genetic and Molecular Research 4: 734–741. [PubMed]
  • Swarça AC, Fenocchio AS, Cestari MM, Dias AL. (2005b) Karyotype divergence among populations of giant catfish Pseudoplatystoma corruscans (Pisces, Pimelodidae) indicates higher species diversity. Ichthological Exploration Freshwaters 16: 325–330.
  • Swarça AC, Fenocchio AS, Cestari MM, Dias AL. (2006) First report of a sex chromosome system in a Sorubiminae fish, Steindachneridion sp. (Pimelodidae), with an uncommon large Y chromosome. Mitotic and Meiotic analysis. Cytogenetic and Genome Research 112: 325–328. https://doi.org/10.1159/000089888 [PubMed]
  • Swarça AC, Fenocchio AS, Dias AL. (2007) An update Cytogenetic Review for Species of the Families Pseudopimelodidae, Pimelodidae and Heptapteridae (Pisces, Siluriformes). Suggestion of a Cytotaxonomical Classification. Caryologia 60: 338–348. https://doi.org/10.1080/00087114.2007.10797957
  • Swarça AC, Fenocchio AS, Cestari MM, Dias AL. (2008) Analyses of the Structure of NORs in Two Species of South American Sorubiminae Fishes (Siluriformes) by Means of Several Cytogenetic Techniques. Folia Biologica (Kraków) 56: 31–35. https://doi.org/10.3409/fb56_1-2.31-35 [PubMed]
  • Swarça AC, Fenocchio AS, Cestari MM, Dias AL. (2009) Localization and characterization of the 5S rDNA bearing chromosome in two Steindachneridion species by means of different cytogenetic techniques. Cytologia 3: 323–327. https://doi.org/10.1508/cytologia.74.323
  • Swarça AC, Sanchez S, Dias AL, Fenocchio AS. (2013) Cytogenetics of the Porthole Shovelnose Catfish, Hemisorubim platyrhynchos (Valenciennes, 1840) (Siluriformes, Pimelodidae), a widespread species in South American rivers. Comparative Cytogenetics 7: 103–110. https://doi.org/10.3897/CompCytogen.v7i2.4901 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Toledo V, Ferrari I. (1976) Estudos citogenéticos de três espécies do gênero Pimelodus (Pisces, Pimelodidae). Científica 4: 101–106.
  • Treco FR, Dias AL. (2009) Karyotypes of two species of the genus Pimelodus (Siluriformes, Pimelodidae). Folia Biologica (Krakow) 57: 43–48. https://doi.org/10.3409/fb57_1-2.43-48 [PubMed]
  • Treco FR, Malabarba LR, Giuliano-Caetano L, Dias AL. (2008) Cytogenetic study of two species of the family Pimelodidae (Siluriformes) collected in lago Guaíba, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. Neotropical Ichthyology 6: 87–92. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1679-62252008000100010
  • Verma RS, Babu A. (1995) Human Chromosomes: Principles and Techniques. 2nd ed. McGraw-Hill Inc., New York, 419 pp.
  • Vissotto PC, Foresti F, Oliveira C. (1999) Karyotype description of five species of Pimelodidae (Teleostei, Siluriformes). Chromosome Science 3: 1–7.
  • Ziemniczak K, Barros AV, Rosa KO, Nogaroto V, Almeida MC, Cestari MM, Moreira-Filho O, Artoni RF, Vicari MR. (2012) Comparative cytogenetics of Loricariidae (Actinopterygii, Siluriformes): emphasis in Neoplecostominae and Hypoptopomatinae. Italian Journal or Zoology 79: 492–501. https://doi.org/10.1080/11250003.2012.676677

Articles from Comparative Cytogenetics are provided here courtesy of Pensoft Publishers