|Home | About | Journals | Submit | Contact Us | Français|
The Iroquois genes (Irx) appear to regulate fundamental processes that lead to cell proliferation, differentiation, and maturation during development. In this report, the Iroquois homeobox 1 (Irx1) transcription factor was functionally disrupted using a LacZ insert and LacZ expression demonstrated stage-specific expression during embryogenesis. Irx1 is highly expressed in the brain, lung, digits, kidney, testis and developing teeth. Irx1 null mice are neonatal lethal and this lethality it due to pulmonary immaturity. Irx1−/− mice show delayed lung maturation characterized by defective surfactant protein secretion and Irx1 marks a population of SP-C expressing alveolar type II cells. Irx1 is specifically expressed in the outer enamel epithelium (OEE), stellate reticulum (SR) and stratum intermedium (SI) layers of the developing tooth. Irx1 mediates dental epithelial cell differentiation in the lower incisors resulting in delayed growth of the lower incisors. Irx1 is specifically and temporally expressed during developmental stages and we have focused on lung and dental development in this report. Irx1+ cells are unique to the development of the incisor outer enamel epithelium, patterning of Lef-1+ and Sox2+ cells as well as a new marker for lung alveolar type II cells. Mechanistically, Irx1 regulates Foxj1 and Sox9 to control cell differentiation during development.
Iroquois genes (Irx) encode a family of proteins with a homeobox domain and a characteristic Iroquois domain in the C terminal region. There are six members of the Iroquois family in mice and humans, which are located in two cognate clusters of three genes each (Houweling et al., 2001). It was reported that each cluster of Iroquois genes forms a three-dimensional structure to share the same enhancer, which dictates their similar expression patterns (Tena et al., 2011). Irx3 and Irx5 are crucial for cardiac morphogenesis and craniofacial development (Bonnard et al., 2012; Gaborit et al., 2012). Irx3 is also related to determination of body mass and obesity (Smemo et al., 2014). Irx1 is expressed in the brain, heart, lung, skin, and the craniofacial region, but its function is unclear. Several studies have indicated that Irx1 is related to lung, brain, kidney and skeletal joint development, but limited research has been done to unveil its function and the cellular mechanisms through which it acts during development (Heliot et al., 2013; Smemo et al., 2014; Askary et al., 2015).
Tooth development, initiation, morphogenesis, and differentiation are controlled by a network of conserved signaling pathways and transcription factors (Thesleff and Tummers, 2008). Enamel formation is one of the most important events for tooth development, and occurs during the late stage of tooth morphogenesis. Inner enamel epithelial cells proliferate and differentiate into ameloblasts, which in turn synthesize enamel matrix proteins such as amelogenin and enamelin, which subsequently form the mineralized enamel layer (Zeichner-David et al., 1995). The maturation of ameloblasts is governed by extracellular signals, that regulate the activity of transcription factors to express genes required for enamel formation (Wang et al., 2004). The cell-cell interactions between ameloblasts, odontoblasts and the stratum intermedium are necessary for ameloblast maturation (Nakamura et al., 1991; Mitsiadis et al., 1995; Zeichner-David et al., 1995; Wang et al., 2004). Although the process and mechanism of amelogenesis is well studied, how extracellular signals from the enamel-free areas control the maturation of ameloblasts remains elusive (Wang et al., 2004).
Lung development originates from the endoderm and mesoderm during early development stages giving rise to branching morphogenesis, proximal-distal patterning of the epithelium and alveologenesis (Cardoso and Whitsett, 2008; Shi et al., 2009; Morrisey and Hogan, 2010; Ornitz and Yin, 2012; Hogan et al., 2014). While Irx1 has been indicated in lung development the specific stages and cells expressing Irx1 are not defined. The processes of branching and proximal-distal patterning of the lung epithelium are specific to Sox2 and Sox9 transcription factors (Chang et al., 2013; Rockich et al., 2013). Initial reports suggested that Irx1 may play a role in lung development at these stages, however molecular mechanisms for Irx1 function are not understood in alveologenesis and gene expression.
Our laboratory has generated RNA-seq data from multiple stages of craniofacial/tooth development in mice from E10.5 to P4 in an effort to identify new genes and pathways in craniofacial morphogenesis. Bioinformatics analyses identified Irx1 expression at early stages of murine development. We generated the Irx1 knockout mice (Irx1−/−) to study the functional role of Irx1 in development. We show detailed expression patterns of Irx1 in both mouse embryos and adults. Irx1 has a very unique expression pattern in dental development. In bell stage teeth and adult teeth, Irx1 is specific to the OEE, SI and SR cells. Identifying markers for these cells are limited and Irx1 appears to mark these cells throughout development. Foxj1 and Sox9 control differentiation of these cell types during tooth development. We demonstrate that Irx1 plays a role in regulating these genes and possibly as a cofactor for other transcription factors. Irx1 null mice were neonatal lethal due to defects in lung development. Interestingly, in lung development, which relies on FoxJ1 and Sox9 expression, we speculate that Irx1 expression in alveolar type II cells regulates these genes. In this article, we provide a study of Irx1 in lung and tooth development.
Mice are maintained in the animal facility of the University of Iowa. All experiments were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the University of Iowa. The Irx1 knockout ES cells were generated by the Knockout Mouse Project Repository (KOMP) in a C57BL/6 background. The genotyping primers for Irx1 are listed below. WT-F: CCGAGGCACTGAGCTGTATC; WT-R: TGTTCAGGTTGGAAGGGTTTCTA TG; KO-F: CTTCAAATTGTGTCTGAGAGC; KO-R: GTCTGTCCTAGCTTCC TCACTG. The Irx1 mutant mice were made by blastocyst ES cell injection and chimeras were screened and mated to obtain Irx1 genotypes. Injections and initial breedings were performed at the Texas A & M Health Science Center, Houston, TX. Embryos were staged by checking vaginal plug of the crossed females. The day with a vaginal plug was set as embryonic day (E) 0.5. For procedure of embryo harvesting, pregnant females were euthanized with CO2 and followed with cervical dislocation. Then embryos were harvested and fixed immediately.
Rat AEC2 (RLE-6TN, ATCC® CRL-2300™), HEK 293T (ATCC® CRL-11268™) and ET-16 oral epithelia cells (gift from Dr. Malcolm Snead, USC) were cultured in DMEM supplemented with 5% FBS, 5% BGS and penicillin/streptomycin at 37 °C with 5% CO2. Lentiviruses were produced by transiently transfected scramble or knockdown constructs in pLKO.1-puro vector together with viral packaging vectors (psPAX2, pMD2G) into HEK 293T cells by calcium phosphate transfection. DMEM supernatant with lentiviruses was harvested 30 h post-transfection and directly used for infection. ET-16 cells were infected with lentiviruses for 48 h and then selected with 5 μg/ml of puromycin (Sigma P8833) for another 3 days before further analysis. Lentivirus-based scramble sequence (shNC): 5′-CCTAAGGTTAAGTCGCCCTCG-3′; Irx1 knockdown sequence (shIrx1): 5′-CCACACAACGCCTGCTTATTA-3′.
The following antibodies were used for immunoblotting and immunostaining: anti-IRX1 (Sigma HPA043160, 1:100 – 1:300), anti-IRX1 (abcam ab98343, 1:200 – 1:500), anti-Lef-1 (Cell signaling #2230, 1:200), anti-Sox2 (R & D systems AF2018, 1:150 & D systems AF2018, 1:150), anti-SP-C (Santa Cruz sc-7706, 1:300), anti-BrdU (abcam ab6326, 1:1000), anti-CIdU (Accurate chemical OBT0030, 1:250), anti-IdU (Roche 11170376001, 1:250). Secondary staining was performed using Alex Fluor488 donkey anti-mouse IgG (Invitrogen A21202, 1:500), Alex Fluor594 donkey anti-mouse IgG (Invitrogen A21203, 1:500), Alex Fluor488 donkey anti-rabbit IgG (Invitrogen A21206, 1:500) DAPI (Invitrogen D1306, 1 μg/ml), Beta-gal (Promega V3941).
Embryos and organs were isolated and pre-fixed with ice-cold fixative buffer (1×PBS with 1% formaldehyde, 0.2% gluteraldehyde and 0.02% NP40) for 2 h at 4 °C. Next, tissues were washed twice (20 min each) in washing buffer (1×PBS with 2 mM MgCl2, 0.02% NP40 and 0.1% sodium deoxycholate) at room temperature. Tissues were then stained with X-gal (1 mg/ml X-gal, 5 mM K3Fe(CN)6 and 5 mM K4Fe(CN)6 in washing buffer) at room temperature overnight. Then they were washed in 1×PBS twice (20 min each) at room temperature and were fixed in 4% PFA overnight. After fixation, the tissues were washed with 1×PBS and imaged with a dissection microscopy in whole mount or after paraffin embedding and sectioning.
Tissue sections (4–6 μm) were taken and prepared with a standard de-paraffinization and hydration process, then stained with eosin or nuclear fast red solution (1 g/L nuclear fast red, 50 g/L Al2[SO4]3·18H2O).
For embryonic stage lung processing, embryos were incubated on ice for 10 min and then the top half of embryos were washed with 1×PBS and fixed in 4% PFA. After fixation, the left lung was dissected and embedded in paraffin. For lung tissue RNA preparation, the left lung was collected before fixation and snap frozen before processing. For postnatal stage lungs, mice were perfused with 1×PBS at the right ventricle to clear the pulmonary vasculature. Then lungs were inflated with 1×PBS through the trachea and fixed in ice-cold 4% PFA.
Embryos and tissues were harvested in fresh and washed with ice-cold 1×PBS once, then fixed with 4% PFA and washed with 1×PBS for 3 times to clear residual PFA. After fixation, embryos and tissues were kept in 70% ethanol and then taken through a standard dehydration and paraffin-embedding process. Sections were cut in 4–6 μm. After de-paraffinization and hydration, sections were treated with citrate buffer in 100 °C water bath for 20 min. For immunofluorescent staining, sections were blocked with donkey serum and incubated with proper primary antibodies overnight in 4 °C. Then sections were washed with 1×PBS, incubated with Alex Fluor488/594 secondary antibodies and stained with DAPI. For immunohistochemistry staining, sections were processed according to the manufacturer of the IHC kit (Abcam, ab64264). Images were captured by Zeiss 700 confocal microscopy or Nikon eclipse microscopy. The integrated density of fluorescent signals was calculated by using the ImageJ software. The length of the entire mandible and lower incisors (measured from the cervical loop to the tip of the lower incisor with the dental lamina) were measured in ImageJ software with the absolute value relative to scale bars in each image.
BrdU (Invitrogen, #00-0103), CIdU (Sigma, #C6891) and IdU (Sigma, #17125) were delivered into pregnant females by intraperitoneal injection at different time points. Following the standard immunostaining process, sections were treated with 2 M HCl for 1 h and neutralized with 1×PBS. Detailed IdU/CIdU labeling processes could be found in our previous paper (Sun et al., 2016).
Gene expression analysis of dental epithelial and mesenchymal cells in neonatal mice showed that several hundred genes had significantly higher expression in dental epithelial cells than mesenchymal cells (data not shown). Irx1 was one of these novel genes, with an expression level that is higher in dental epithelial cells compared to mesenchymal cells.
In order to unveil the function of Irx1 during craniofacial/dental development we disrupted the Irx1 gene in mice. The Irx1 coding region was replaced with an exogenous LacZ reporter gene (Fig. 1A), which allowed us to detect the expression pattern of Irx1 during development. Two pairs of genotyping primers (probes) were designed as shown in Fig. 1A. PCR results from tail genomic DNA showed Irx1+/+ mice had a 100 bp band, while Irx1−/− mice only had a 400 bp band (Fig. 1B). To demonstrate that Irx1 was truly ablated in Irx1−/− mice, we probed for the presence of Irx1 mRNA and protein from both Irx1+/+ and Irx1−/− tissues. Quantitative RT-PCR and Western blot results showed that Irx1 was successfully deleted in Irx1−/− mice (Fig. 1C, D).
Embryos from E10.5 to E13.5 were harvested and subjected to whole-mount X-gal staining. X-gal staining results in Irx1+/− whole embryos showed that Irx1 is highly expressed in the brain, somites, lung, kidney, reproductive organs, eye, and limb buds and digits (Fig. 2A–D), which is consistent with previous studies (Becker et al., 2001; Houweling et al., 2001; Diaz-Hernandez et al., 2013; Heliot et al., 2013). In order to examine whether Irx1 was still expressed in these organs at adult stages, organs from postnatal day (P) 30 adult Irx1+/− mice were collected and stained with X-gal. Irx1 is expressed in mid-brain, lung, kidney, skin, testis and epididymis (Fig. 2E–H). H & E staining of sections from these tissues are shown in Fig. 2I to L. Irx1 is expressed in the skin hair follicle, alveoli of the lung epithelium, intermediate tubules in the kidney, and spermatocytes in the testis (Fig. 2I–L).
In teeth, Irx1 is expressed in the entire dental epithelial cell population including the vestibular lamina (VL) at the early stages of tooth development, and its expression is narrowed to the dental epithelium at later stages of incisor development (Fig. 3A, B). In late bell stage teeth, Irx1 is only expressed in three specific cell layers, namely, outer enamel epithelium (OEE), stratum intermedium (SI) and stellate reticulum (SR) (Fig. 3C, D). This highly specific expression pattern was confirmed in adult teeth by X-gal staining (Fig. 3E).
We analyzed the genotypes of the offspring of Irx1+/− intercrosses. At P0, the Irx1+/+ and Irx1+/− mice had a birth ratio of 1:2, and no Irx1−/− mice were found (Table 1). At early embryonic stages, Irx1−/−embryos were found with normal Mendelian frequency (Table 1). With careful analysis, we found Irx1−/− pups were born with normal Mendelian frequency, but died within several hours of delivery (Table 1). These Irx1−/− mice had abnormal thoracic contractions, had labored breathing and diffculties with respiration (video not shown). In addition, Irx1−/− pups had a purple body color and showed no evidence of milk ingestion, which is a phenotype commonly associated with respiratory failure or cleft palate (Turgeon and Meloche, 2009) (Fig. 4A). Coronal sections of P0 Irx1−/− mouse heads were performed for histological analysis, and we found no evidence of cleft palate defects (data not shown). The lungs from Irx1−/− pups were smaller compared to the lungs from Irx1+/+ pups, but the total body weight of Irx1−/− pups were not significantly decreased (Fig. 4B, C). Histological analysis of the left lung from E16.5 embryos showed no significant difference in lung structure, however the Irx1−/− lungs were smaller in size (Fig. 4D). Histological analysis at E18.5 showed that the lungs from Irx1−/− embryos had more saccular space, and much of the saccular space was not well formed. Interestingly, histological analysis at P0 showed opposite results. The lungs from Irx1+/+ pups had more saccular space compared to the lungs from Irx1−/− pups, in contrast to our findings at E18.5. Since the lungs used for histological analysis were not inflated, the saccular space in Irx1−/− lungs may have collapsed after birth (Fig. 4E).
Because Irx1 is expressed in a specific cell population in the lung, we asked whether Irx1 was expressed in the alveolar type II epithelium (AEC2). We performed double immunostaining of Irx1 and SP-C, a surfactant protein that marks AEC2 cells. Specifically, all the cells stained with Irx1 were also stained with SP-C, although we did find a small population of cells that were only stained with SP-C (Fig. 5A, white arrow, SP-C; yellow arrows, both, in merged panel). We confirmed this result in AEC2 cell lines from rat. Immunostaining of Irx1 in cultured type II cells from the rat showed that most type II cells had Irx1 positive signals in the nucleus (Fig. 5B). To determine whether Irx1 is required for AEC2 cells to function normally, we examined surfactant protein expression in lungs from both Irx1+/+ and Irx1−/− mice. Immunostaining of SP-C at P0 stages showed that SP-C protein levels were down-regulated in Irx1−/− lungs (bottom panels) (Fig. 5C, D). Quantitative RT-PCR analysis of the mRNA levels of surfactant proteins showed that Sftpa1, Sftpc and Sftpd were significantly down-regulated in E18.5 Irx1−/− lungs (Fig. 5E).
With the unique expression pattern of Irx1 in teeth, we asked whether Irx1 loss-of-function would affect tooth development. Immunostaining of Irx1 confirmed that Irx1 was ablated in Irx1 knockout mice (Fig. 3B, D), making it an ideal model to determine the role of Irx1 in OEE, SR and SI cellular function. In E13.5 Irx1−/−embryos, the lower incisors showed reduced cell differentiation (poorly polarized dental epithelium) (Fig. 6A). At later stages, we sectioned the entire heads of E18.5 and P0 Irx1+/+ and Irx1−/− mice, we did not observe any difference about the size of the entire head and mandible between Irx1+/+ and Irx1−/− mice (data not shown). We only observed molars and lower incisor growth was reduced in Irx1−/− embryos compared to molars and lower incisors from Irx1+/+ embryos (Fig. 6B,C,D). Lower incisors in Irx1−/− embryos and neonates were approximately 85% the length of the lower incisors from Irx1+/+ embryos and neonates, indicating that Irx1 regulated later stages of tooth morphogenesis.
We next tested whether cell proliferation verses cell differentiation was down-regulated in Irx1−/− teeth and if this could explain the smaller tooth phenotype. BrdU incorporation assays were performed in E18.5 lower incisors. In E18.5 lower incisors, the inner enamel epithelial (IEE) cells close to the cervical loop region were labeled with BrdU signals (Fig. 7A, blue arrows). In contrast, the outer enamel epithelial (OEE) cells, which express Irx1, were not labeled with BrdU in the Irx1−/− embryos compared to WT (Fig. 7A, black arrows). In addition, there was not a significant difference between BrdU positive cells in the IEE cell layers when comparing the Irx1+/+ and Irx1−/− lower incisors (Fig. 7B), indicating that cell proliferation is not significantly altered in Irx1−/− teeth. We next asked whether cell differentiation was down-regulated in Irx1−/− teeth. We performed 5-chloro-2-deoxyuridin (CIdU) and 5-iodo-2-deoxyuridin (IdU) pulse-chase experiments. CIdU and IdU were injected at different time points (pulse), and labeled cells were analyzed by double fluorescent staining (CIdU, 36 h; IdU, 2 h, see diagram). Cells retaining the CldU label would have divided and migrated from the labial cervical loop (LaCL) region before cells retaining the IdU label. Recent cell proliferation in the LaCL is shown by cells retaining the IdU label. As expected, IdU+ cells (green) marked cells undergoing proliferation at the labial cervical loop region (P) (Fig. 7C). In contrast, CIdU+ cells (red) not only marked those cells, but also cells that differentiated from this region of the lower incisors (NP) (Fig. 7C). We analyzed the number of IdU+ cells and CIdU+ cells in the lower incisor epithelial layers. There were less CIdU+ cells at the proximal region (P region) of Irx1+/+ lower incisors compared to Irx1−/−incisors and more CIdU+ cells at the distal regions (NP region) in Irx1+/+ lower incisors compared to Irx1−/− lower incisors (Fig. 7D), indicating that CIdU+ cells remained in the LaCL region (P) in Irx1−/−lower incisors and did not differentiate compared to Irx1+/+ lower incisors.
While Irx1 is expressed in the early dental epithelium and the dental placode, at later stages it is specifically expressed in the OEE, which was not a significant part of the cell populations labeled in the pulse-chase experiments (Fig. 7). Therefore, we hypothesized that decreased cell differentiation in the incisor was a secondary effect caused by defects in OEE cell differentiation. We have previously shown that Sox2 and Lef-1 contribute to distinct cell populations in the developing lower incisor (Zhao, Yu et al., 2016). Double fluorescent staining showed that Lef-1 and Sox2 are expressed in distinct cell populations of the lower incisor (Fig. 8A, top panels). We asked whether these distinct populations of cells were affected by ablating Irx1 expression in the incisor. We examined Lef-1+ and Sox2+ cell distribution in cap stage lower incisors of Irx1+/+ and Irx1−/− embryos. Interestingly, both Lef-1+ and Sox2+ cell distribution within the dental epithelium were altered. In WT (Irx1+/+) cap stage teeth, Sox2+ cells were localized to the labial cervical loop region, but Sox2+ cells were localized not only in the labial cervical loop region, but also in a lingual region close to the oral epithelium in Irx1−/− embryos (Fig. 8A, second panel, white asterix), which is a region that expresses Irx1 (Fig. 3B). Furthermore, Lef-1 expression is reduced in the surrounding lingual dental mesenchyme in the Irx1−/− embryos, adjacent to the region of increased Sox2+ epithelial cells (Fig. 8A, second panel, yellow asterix). In late bell stage incisors (E18.5), Irx1 is expressed in the OEE cells adjacent and separate from Sox2+ cells in the LaCL (Fig. 8B). X-gal staining of Irx1+/− and Irx1−/− lower incisors demonstrate less X-gal positive cells in the OEE cell layer of Irx1−/− lower incisors, indicating that the dental stem cell to OEE differentiation pathway was down-regulated in part by the absence of functional Irx1 (Fig. 8C). In support of this both the OEE and SI cell layers are underdeveloped as are the preameloblasts (AM) of the IEE and odontoblasts (OD).
In order to characterize the regulatory role of Irx1 during tooth development, we isolated total RNA from E14.5 Irx1+/+ and Irx1−/−maxillary and mandibular tissues to perform RNA-seq analysis. RNA-seq results showed approximately 300 genes were down-regulated and 70 genes were upregulated (Fig. 9A), suggesting that Irx1 predominantly acts as a transcriptional activator during tooth development. The top functional gene cluster among the down-regulated genes were those implicated in cell differentiation such as Foxj1, Sox9, Lhx2, Foxa1 and Sox5 (Fig. 9B). Among these gene clusters, Foxj1 was down-regulated and of great interest to us, since our previous studies found that the Foxj1 knockout mice displayed arrested OEE cell differentia-tion and reduced tooth growth (Venugopalan et al., 2011). In order to confirm the RNA-seq results, we performed quantitative RT-PCR analysis of Foxj1 from P0 lower incisor tissues. The Foxj1 transcript level was reduced 60% in Irx1−/− lower incisors (Fig. 9C). We also confirmed this regulation in cultured cells by knocking down Irx1 in ET-16 oral epithelial cells (Fig. 9D). Together, these results support the idea that Irx1 plays an important role in regulating the expression of genes that are responsible for cell differentiation and reveals an especially important role for Irx1 and these associated factors during tooth and lung morphogenesis. Irx1 may also act as an important transcription co-factor through protein interactions facilitated by its Iro domain.
In this article, we have shown that Irx1 is specifically expressed in AEC2 and OEE cells. Irx1 regulates alveolar progenitors and dental stem cell differentiation by regulating the expression of differentiation-related genes such as Foxj1 (Fig. 9E). Ablation of Irx1 in AEC2 cells disrupted surfactant protein secretion, which provides surfactant tension in the lung saccular space for breathing. In preparation for normal breathing after birth, the lung is required to develop mature AEC1 and AEC2 cells during sacculation (Morrisey and Hogan, 2010, Desai et al., 2014). Our findings of Irx1 in AEC2 cells provide a new candidate gene to further study molecular mechanisms of lung development. We show that Irx1 is expressed in AEC2 cell populations. It is reported that AEC2 cells are progenitor cells in the alveolar sacs, which are responsible for alveolar self-renewal and repair after injury (Barkauskas et al., 2013, Desai et al., 2014). Irx1 could be a more specific marker for progenitor-like AEC2 cells compared to SP-C in adult lung. There are two possible functions of Irx1 during alveologenesis: 1) Irx1 regulates the transcription of surfactant proteins, and/or 2) Irx1 regulates progenitor cells differentiation into mature AEC2 cells. The identification that Irx1 positively regulates Foxj1 and Sox9 expression and negatively regulates Sox2 expression suggests a role in the transition of progenitor cells toward mature AEC2 cells and the saccular phase. We are currently generating Irx1-3ox/3ox conditional knockout and Irx1-Cre animals to determine the detailed cellular and molecular mechanisms of Irx1 during development.
We also demonstrated that Irx1 was expressed in dental epithelial cells of the placode stage and bud stage teeth, and then limited to specific epithelial cell layers. Three cell types located labial to the ameloblasts, the outer enamel epithelium (OEE), stellate reticulum (SR) and stratum intermedium (SI) are reported to be associated with amelogenesis. In the Msx2 knockout mouse, the structure of the stratum intermedium layer is disrupted, which impairs normal ameloblast function and enamel deposition (Satokata et al., 2000). Irx1 appears to have a similar function, but is more specific expression in these cell types differentiates it from Msx2. However, ablation of Irx1 is novel because of its specific expression in these cell types and as a unique marker for late stage OEE, and SI. The lack of Irx1 in incisors leads to defective OEE cell differentiation in the lower incisors. As a result, IEE cell differentiation is down-regulated and tooth growth is reduced. Irx1 ablation during early stages of tooth development appears to regulate the positioning of Sox2+ and Lef-1+ cell niches within the tooth germ. The increase in Sox2+ cells in the Irx1−/− mice suggest that Irx1 is regulating the positioning and/or boundary of Sox2+ cells during development. Interestingly, during normal development Irx1 delineates a boundary between Sox2+ and Irx1+ cells in the OEE. While we do not provide evidence that Irx1 directly inhibits Sox2 expression, we have preliminary data that indicates Irx1 interacts with other proteins to down-regulate activation of Sox2 expression (data not shown). Irx1 can directly interact with other factors to regulate their transcriptional activity and downstream targets. Our findings provide evidence that OEE, SR and SI cells are necessary for tooth development. Although these cells do not produce enamel and dentin to form the hard structures of the tooth, they are required for normal tooth formation. Preliminary data also suggests that Irx1 marks cementoblasts cells in mice molars (data not shown).
In this report, we focused on the cell and tissue developmental activity of Irx1 at the later stages of embryonic development, but the function of Irx1 in early lung and tooth development is still elusive. Irx1 is expressed very early during organogenesis, but the defects caused by Irx1 ablation appeared to be mild. Considering Irx1, Irx2, and Irx6 share the same enhancer and co-regulators, it is possible that gene redundancy plays a role in such circumstances. In order to further determine the detailed functions of Irx1 during embryonic development, a double or triple knockout strategy could be a better way to determine the global functions of the Iroquois family.
This work was supported by funds from the University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa College of Dentistry and National Institutes of Health, grant DE13941 and R90 DE024296-03. We thank William Shalot (Texas A & M Health Science Center, Houston, TX) for ES cell injections and mutant mouse development. We thank Dr. Malcolm Snead (USC, Los Angeles, CA) for the ET-16 oral epithelial cell line. We thank Drs. Hank Qi, John Engelhardt and David Meyerholz, (University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA) for reagents, helpful comments and ideas and all of the members of the Amendt laboratory for their help and comments.
The authors declare no competing or financial interests.