PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptHHS Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
 
Drug Dev Ind Pharm. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2017 September 14.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC5598079
NIHMSID: NIHMS904193

Delivery of cefotaxime to the brain via intranasal administration

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the plausibility of delivery of cefotaxime to the brain via intranasal administration. In vitro permeation studies were carried out using Franz diffusion cells, and the effect of different concentrations of chitosan (0.1% w/v and 0.25% w/v) on drug permeation across the bovine olfactory mucosa was determined. Samples were collected from the receiver compartment at different time points and analyzed using HPLC. The amount of cefotaxime that permeated across the olfactory mucosa when 0.25% w/v of chitosan was used as a permeation enhancer was ~1.5- and ~2-fold higher at the end of the first hour and second hour, respectively, over control (29.56 ± 6.18 μg/cm2). There was no significant enhancement in drug permeation when 0.1% w/v chitosan was used as the permeation enhancer. Pharmacokinetic studies were carried out using Sprague-Dawley rats. Cefotaxime solution with 0.25% w/v chitosan (40 mg/kg) was administered intravenously (i.v.) to rats in groups 1 and 3 and intranasally to those in group 2 and 4. The time course of drug in the brain was investigated by performing microdialysis in rats of groups 1 and 2. Blood samples were withdrawn from rats in groups 3 and 4, and cefotaxime in plasma was analyzed using HPLC after extraction with a hydrochloric acid–chloroform:1-pentanol (3:1) and phosphate buffer solvent system. Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated using the trapezoidal rule. The results imply that the drug levels attained in the brain following i.v. and intranasal administrations were comparable. These results suggest that intranasal administration of cefotaxime could be a potential method of delivering antibacterial agents because of it being noninvasive and patient compliant.

Keywords: Cefotaxime, chitosan, nose to brain, bioavailability, microdialysis, pharmacokinetics

Introduction

Meningitis is an infection of the cerebrospinal fluid and meninges that surround the brain and spinal cord. Bacterial meningitis is primarily caused by three main bacterial species (Neisseria meningitidis, Streptococcus pneumonia, and Haemophilus influenzae type B) and it accounts for three-fourth of meningitis infection around the world. Bacterial meningitis is more common in African, American, and Asian countries. Generally, it is treated using large doses of antibiotics such as chloramphenicol and cephalosporins14. Effective levels of antibiotics should be maintained in the brain all through the treatment period for successful treatment of meningitis. In most developing countries, the use of cephalosporins is limited, despite their greater potency, due to high cost.

Cefotaxime is one of the cephalosporins recommended for the treatment of bacterial meningitis and is generally administered via the parenteral or oral route57. Systemic delivery of cephalosporins including cefotaxime is associated with the potential risk of causing severe systemic side effects2,8,9. Moreover, the drug has short elimination half-life in the brain, hence, frequent administration is inevitable during the treatment. Therefore, there is need for a patient compliant method to deliver cefotaxime to the brain.

It is well established that there exists a direct pathway from nose to brain via the olfactory region1013. This route has been investigated as a potential route for delivery of several small and large molecular weight therapeutic agents11,1417. Nose to brain pathway could deliver drugs directly to the brain, bypassing the blood–brain barrier (BBB)18. Moreover, intranasal delivery would be noninvasive and allows frequent administration. Apart from this, treatment with nasal drops would be less expensive than parenteral or oral therapy. Nasal drops can be self-administered and do not require physician supervision during administration unlike in the case of parenteral formulations. Oral therapy of cefotaxime requires administration of large doses. Hence, nasal formulations are likely to reduce overall cost of the therapy. Therefore, in this study, the plausibility of delivering cefotaxime to the brain via intranasal route was investigated.

Olfactory mucosa acts as a significant barrier to the delivery of drugs via nose to brain. Therefore, several strategies have been investigated to enhance the permeability of the olfactory mucosa. It was reported by Vaka and coworkers16 that chitosan leads to reversible permeabilization of olfactory mucosa. It was also reported by Smith and coworkers as well as Dodane and coworkers19,20 that chitosan in other membranes is capable of enhancing the permeability of mucous membranes by opening of the tight junctions. The bioavailability of nerve growth factor (NGF) in the brain following intranasal administration of a chitosan-containing formulation was found to be ~14-fold higher than the formulation that did not contain chitosan16. Therefore, in this study, chitosan was used as a permeability enhancer of olfactory mucosa.

Materials and methods

Chemicals

Cefotaxime sodium salt, chitosan (MW ~250 kDa, 75–80% deacetylation), Krebs-Ringer bicarbonate (KRB) buffer (premixed powder), 1-butanol, and potassium phosphate (monobasic) were procured from Sigma Chemicals (St. Louis, MO). Chloroform, phosphoric acid, and acetonitrile were obtained from Fischer Scientific (Atlanta, GA).

Olfactory mucosa

Bovine olfactory mucosa was used for in vitro studies and was purchased from Pel-Freez Biologicals (Rogers, AR). Bovine olfactory mucosa is similar to human olfactory mucosa with respect to drug transport and metabolic pathways21. Freshly excised frozen tissue was obtained from the supplier and used within 24 h of excision. It was thawed for a period of 30 min by immersing in sterile KRB buffer before carrying out the permeation studies.

In vitro permeation studies

In vitro permeation studies across the bovine olfactory mucosa were carried out using vertical Franz diffusion apparatus (Logan Instruments, Somerset, NJ). The olfactory mucosa with a diffusion area of 0.64 cm2 was sandwiched between the donor and receiver compartments such that the dorsal side of the tissue is facing the donor compartment and the ventral side is facing the receiver compartment. The donor and receiver compartments were fitted with Ag/AgCl electrodes (procured from Alfa Aesar, Ward Hill, MA) in the form of a circular ring with a diameter of 0.5 mm. They were placed 2 mm away from the tissue in both the donor and receiver compartments. The electrical resistance of the mucosa was measured by placing a load resistor RL (100 kΩ) in series with mucosa after filling the donor and receiver compartments with 500 μL and 5 mL of KRB buffer, respectively. Waveform generator and multimeter (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA) were used to measure voltage drop across the whole circuit (Vo) and across the mucosa (VE). The resistance of the tissue was measured by applying a small voltage of about 100 mV at 10 Hz and the resistance in kΩ cm2 was approximated16.

The effect of different concentrations of chitosan (0.1% and 0.25% w/v) on the permeation of cefotaxime was investigated (Figure 1). Drug–chitosan solution was prepared by dissolving the required quantity of chitosan in 1% glacial acetic acid solution in KRB followed by the addition of cefotaxime (1 mg/mL). This solution (500 μL) was placed in the donor compartment and the receiver compartment was filled with KRB buffer. Control set of experiments were run without incorporation of chitosan in donor solution. The amount of cefotaxime that permeated across the olfactory mucosa was determined by analyzing the samples collected from the receiver compartment using HPLC.

Figure 1
Effect of different concentrations of chitosan on in vitro permeability of cefotaxime across the bovine olfactory mucosa (unfilled, gray filled, and black filled bars represent control, 0.1%, and 0.25% w/v chitosan, respectively). Data points provided ...

Analytical method

An HPLC system (Waters, 1525) consisting of a Phenomenex C-18 analytical column (4.6 mm × 150 mm, Luna 5.0 μm) and a variable wavelength detector (Waters, 2487) was used. The mobile phase was made up of 0.007 M phosphoric acid in water–acetonitrile (85:15 v/v), flow rate was 1.3 mL/min, and the column effluent was monitored at 254 nm. Range of calibration curve was 0.025 to 1 μg/mL (R2 = 0.99)22.

Extraction of cefotaxime

Blank plasma obtained from untreated rats was spiked with known concentrations of cefotaxime and the calibration curve was plotted using the analytical method as mentioned in the previous section.

The rat plasma samples containing cefotaxime were extracted initially by vortexing 1 mL of plasma with 0.5 mL of 0.4 M HCl. Then, 7 mL of chloroform–1-pentanol (3:1) was added to the mixture and vortexed for 30 min followed by centrifugation at 4°C for a period of 10 min at 1000g. From this the bottom organic phase (5 mL) was collected and 350 μL of phosphate buffer (pH 7) was added so as to back extract (30 min) the cefotaxime, which was then centrifuged at 4°C for a period of 10 min. The upper aqueous phase was quantified by HPLC23.

Calibration of microdialysis probe

Microdialysis probes (CMA 12) were calibrated in vitro by immersing the probes in dialysis media containing cefotaxime (concentrations 25, 50, and 75 μg/mL). A syringe pump controller (BASi, West Lafayette, IN) was used to continuously perfuse the KRB buffer at a flow rate of 2.0 μL/min. The probes were equilibrated for a period of 30 min and then samples were collected at regular intervals for a period of 6 h. The percentage recovery was calculated as the ratio of dialysate concentration to its concentration in the dialysis medium surrounding the probe

Percentagerecovery=Concentration ofthe dialysateConcentration of the dialysismembrane surrounding the probe

Pharmacokinetic studies

Pharmacokinetic studies were carried out in Sprague-Dawley rats (male, 250–300 g; Harlan Company, Indianapolis, IN). The experimental procedures were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) at the University of Mississippi (protocol no. 10-017). Rats were categorized into four groups (n = 3 for groups 1 and 2 and n = 6 for groups 3 and 4) and anesthetized using ketamine (80 mg/kg) and xylazine (10 mg/kg) (intraperitoneal injection).

Cefotaxime solution with 0.25% w/v chitosan (40 mg/kg) was administered intravenously (i.v.) to rats in groups 1 and 3 and intranasally (i.e. administration of drug directly into the posterior segment of the nose using a microsyringe connected with a soft polymer capillary) to rats in groups 2 and 4.

In case of rats belonging to groups 1 and 2, the time course of drug in the brain was investigated by microdialysis. A microdialysis probe (CMA 12) was inserted into the brain (anterior-posterior = 5.6 mm, mediolateral = 5 mm, dorsoventral = 7 mm, from bregma) after securing the rat on a stereotaxic frame (Harvard Instruments, Holliston, MA). The microdialysis probes were equilibrated by perfusing KRB buffer at 2 μL/min for a period of 30 min with the aid of a microinjection pump. Following i.v. or intranasal administration of cefotaxime solution (10 mg in 100 μL), the microdialysis fractions were collected at 15, 30, 60, 90, 120, 180, 240, 300, and 360 min and quantified using HPLC.

In case of rats belonging to groups 3 and 4, blood samples were collected at 15, 30, 60, 90, 120, 180, 240, 300, and 360 min from retroorbital plexus using heparinized capillary tubes. Plasma was collected from blood samples by centrifuging at 1500 rpm for 15 min and cefotaxime was analyzed using HPLC after extraction with HCl, chloroform–1-pentanol (3:1) and phosphate buffer solvent system.

Data analysis

Statistical analysis was carried out using GraphPad Prism 5 software. T-test was selected as the test of significance, and P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Pharmacokinetic data analysis

AUC was calculated using the trapezoidal rule, and Cmax and tmax were directly obtained from the concentration–time graphs.

Results and discussion

In vitro permeation studies

Chitosan (0.25% w/v) enhanced the permeation of cefotaxime across the bovine olfactory mucosa by ~1.5-fold and ~2-fold at the end of the first hour and second hour, respectively, over control (29.56 ± 6.18 μg/cm2). However, a significant enhancement of cefotaxime permeation at 0.1% w/v concentration of chitosan was not noted. Overall, the enhancement in the permeability of drug by chitosan was not as dramatic as that observed in case of NGF16. Therefore, a solution of drug in 0.25% w/v chitosan was used for intranasal and i.v. administration in in vivo studies. Furthermore, higher concentrations of chitosan were not considered as the increased viscosity of the formulation is likely to cause discomfort upon intranasal administration in rats.

Pharmacokinetics of cefotaxime in the brain

In vitro recovery of microdialysis probes was found to be 12.84 ± 1.42%, and the recovery of cefotaxime from plasma was 39.60 ± 3.25%.

The Cmax of cefotaxime in the brain following intranasal administration (1.477 ± 0.19 μg/mL) was found to be less than that observed upon i.v. administration (3.286 ± 1.17 μg/mL). This difference in Cmax is likely a result of drug loss caused by absorption of a greater fraction of drug from nasal mucosa into the systemic circulation followed by elimination via normal clearance. Similar kind of observations using tetramethylpyrazine were reported earlier by Hussian and coworkers as well as by Illum12,24.

Moreover, the bioavailability (AUC0−∞) of cefotaxime in the brain following intranasal administration (0.38 ± 0.06 × 103 min·μg/mL) was not significantly different from the bioavailability (AUC0−∞) following i.v. administration (0.45 ± 0.06 × 103 min·μg/mL) (Figure 2).

Figure 2
Concentration–time profile of cefotaxime in rat brain following intravenous (Δ) and intranasal (□) administration. Data points represent baseline-adjusted values and are average of values obtained from three animals with SEM as ...

However, the time required to achieve maximum concentration (tmax) was less upon intranasal administration (30 min) compared with i.v. administration (180 min). Similar observations have been reported in case of tetramethylpyrazine. Frey and coworkers14 suggested that rapid absorption of drug via the olfactory region could be due to convective transport of drugs along the nose–brain pathway. The ability of intranasally administered drugs to reach the brain relatively faster than those given via the i.v. route was previously reported by Illum12 in case of hydrophilic drugs.

The minimum concentration at which a drug has the ability to inhibit bacterial growth is defined as minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC). MIC levels of cefotaxime against most bacteria causing meningitis range from 0.01 to 0.6 μg/mL9. From Figure 2 it is evident that the drug delivered via intranasal route attained MIC levels rapidly and remained over MIC through a 6-h duration similar to that observed upon i.v. administration.

Provided these data are translatable to humans, effective levels of drug could be achieved in the brain rapidly via intranasal administration and frequent administration would keep the drug levels fairly consistent throughout the treatment duration. Although the brain levels of cefotaxime are higher following i.v. administration (Figure 2), intranasal route may be preferred over i.v. route because of noninvasiveness and potentially minimal side effects. Moreover, overshooting the MIC levels in the brain, as seen in the case of i.v. route, is not likely to improve the treatment but could cause toxicity in case of certain drugs with small therapeutic window.

Bioavailability of the drug in the brain following i.v. administration was expected to be higher than that following intranasal administration. However, the overall brain uptake following either route of administration was found to be comparable. This could be attributed to the rapid hepatic metabolism of drug in the systemic circulation. Liver is the major metabolic organ for cefotaxime25,26 where it was enzymatically metabolized to desacetylcefotaxime25,26. It was also reported that desacetylcefotaxime is only 12% as active as cefotaxime27. Earlier, Tsai et al. reported a Cmax of ~1.9 μg/mL in the brain following i.v. administration, which is ~2-fold less compared with the present case. However, the bioavailability (AUC0−t) did not differ significantly between these two studies.

Pharmacokinetics of cefotaxime in plasma

Drug levels in the plasma following intranasal administration were almost an order of magnitude less when compared with those after i.v. administration (Figure 3). The AUC0−∞ levels following intranasal administration and i.v. administration were 15.32 ± 3.42 × 103 min·μg/mL and 371.30 ± 191.02 × 103 min·μg/mL, respectively. These data suggest that the drug is likely to undergo metabolism in the mucosal membrane. However, low systemic bioavailability following intranasal administration is likely to result in less systemic side effects compared with parenteral administration.

Figure 3
Concentration–time profile of cefotaxime in rat plasma following intravenous (Δ) and intranasal (□) administration. Data points represent baseline-adjusted values and are average of values obtained from six animals with SEM as ...

These results indicate that intranasal route could be utilized as one of the potential routes for delivery of cefotaxime to the brain. Effective drug levels could be achieved by increasing the dose or frequency of administration. Intranasal administration of cefotaxime was also found to result in relatively low systemic bioavailability. These results suggest that intranasal delivery of cefotaxime could be developed as a potential treatment approach for bacterial meningitis.

Acknowledgments

The project was funded by grant no. 5P20RR021929 from the National Center for Research Resources. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Center for Research Resources or National Institutes of Health.

Footnotes

Declaration of interest

The authors report no conflicts of interest.

References

1. Gary PY. Cephalosporins for bacterial meningitis. West J Med. 1987;146:607–608. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
2. Pedro FV, Carmen C, Roman P, Tubau FE, Javier ML, Josefina L, et al. High doses of cefotaxime in treatment of adult meningitis due to Streptococcus pneumoniae with decreased susceptibilities to broad-spectrum cephalosporins. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1996;40:218–220. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
3. Nelson JD. Emerging role of cephalosporins in bacterial meningitis. Am J Med. 1985;79:47–51. [PubMed]
4. Puddicombe JB, Wali SS, Greenwood BM. A field trial of a single intramuscular injection of long-acting chloramphenicol in the treatment of meningococcal meningitis. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1984;78:399–403. [PubMed]
5. Nau R, Prange HW, Muth P, Mahr G, Menck S, Kolenda H, et al. Passage of cefotaxime and ceftriaxone into cerebrospinal fluid of patients with uninflamed meninges. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1993;37:1518–1524. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
6. Tsai TH, Chen YF, Chen KC, Shum AY, Chen CF. Concurrent quantification and pharmacokinetic analysis of cefotaxime in rat blood and brain by microdialysis and microbore liquid chromatography. J Chromatogr B Biomed Sci Appl. 2000;738:75–81. [PubMed]
7. Sjölin J. High-dose corticosteroid therapy in human septic shock: has the jury reached a correct verdict? Circ Shock. 1991;35:139–151. [PubMed]
8. Maurice JA, Enno DW, Dick T, Ron AM. Pharmacokinetics of cefotaxime and desacetylcefotaxime in infants during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2010;54:1734–1741. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
9. Turnidge JD. Pharmacodynamic (kinetic) considerations in the treatment of moderately severe infections with cefotaxime. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1995;22:57–69. [PubMed]
10. Shilpey MT. Transport of molecules from nose to brain: transneuronal anteograde and retrograde labeling in the rat olfactory system by wheat germ agglutinin–horseradish peroxidase applied to the nasal mucosa. Brain Res Bull. 1985;15:129–142. [PubMed]
11. Baker H, Spencer RF. Transneuronal transport of peroxidase-conjugated wheat germ agglutinin (WGA-HRP) from the olfactory epithelium to the brain of the adult rat. Exp Brain Res. 1986;63:461–473. [PubMed]
12. Illum L. Nasal drug delivery–possibilities, problems and solutions. J Control Release. 2003;87:187–198. [PubMed]
13. Mathison S, Nagilla R, Kompella UB. Nasal route for direct delivery of solutes to the central nervous system: fact or fiction? J Drug Target. 1998;5:415–441. [PubMed]
14. Frey WH, Liu L, Chen XQ, Thorne RG, Fawerrtt JR, Ala TA, et al. Delivery of 125I-NGF to the brain via the olfactory route. Drug Deliv. 1997;4:87–92.
15. Chen XQ, Fawcett JR, Rahman YE, Ala TA, Frey WH., II Delivery of nerve growth factor to the brain via the olfactory pathway. J Alzheimers Dis. 1998;1:35–44. [PubMed]
16. Vaka SR, Sammeta SM, Day LB, Murthy SN. Delivery of nerve growth factor to brain via intranasal administration and enhancement of brain uptake. J Pharm Sci. 2009;98:3640–3646. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
17. Kandimalla KK, Donovan MD. Carrier mediated transport of chlorpheniramine and chlorcyclizine across bovine olfactory mucosa: implications on nose-to-brain transport. J Pharm Sci. 2005;94:613–624. [PubMed]
18. Hanson LR, Frey WH., 2nd Strategies for intranasal delivery of therapeutics for the prevention and treatment of neuroAIDS. J Neuroimmune Pharmacol. 2007;2:81–86. [PubMed]
19. Smith J, Wood E, Dornish M. Effect of chitosan on epithelial cell tight junctions. Pharm Res. 2004;21:43–49. [PubMed]
20. Dodane V, Amin Khan M, Merwin JR. Effect of chitosan on epithelial permeability and structure. Int J Pharm. 1999;182:21–32. [PubMed]
21. Schmidt MC, Simmen D, Hilbe M, Boderke P, Ditzinger G, Sandow J, et al. Validation of excised bovine nasal mucosa as in vitro model to study drug transport and metabolic pathways in nasal epithelium. J Pharm Sci. 2000;89:396–407. [PubMed]
22. Richard LY, Hartmut D. Rapid chromatographic conditions of cefotaxime and its metabolite in biological fluids. J Chromatogr B Biomed Sci Appl. 1985;341:131–138.
23. Brisson AM, Fourtillan JB. Determination of cephalosporins in biological material by reversed-phase liquid column chromatography. J Chromatogr. 1981;223:393–399. [PubMed]
24. Hussain A, Foster T, Hirai S, Kashihara T, Batenhorst R, Jones M. Nasal absorption of propranolol in humans. J Pharm Sci. 1980;69:1240. [PubMed]
25. Chamberlain J, Coombes JD, Dell D, Fromson JM, Ings RJ, Macdonald CM, et al. Metabolism of cefotaxime in animals and man. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1980;6(Suppl A):69–78. [PubMed]
26. Coombes JD. Metabolism of cefotaxime in animals and humans. Rev Infect Dis. 1982;4(Suppl):S325–S332. [PubMed]
27. Limbert M, Seibert G, Schrinner E. The cooperation of cefotaxime and desacetyl-cefotaxime with respect to antibacterial activity and beta-lactamase stability. Infection. 1982;10:97–100. [PubMed]