PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of scirepAboutEditorial BoardFor AuthorsScientific Reports
 
Sci Rep. 2017; 7: 11320.
Published online 2017 September 12. doi:  10.1038/s41598-017-11513-5
PMCID: PMC5595969

A Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor Mimetic Is Sufficient to Restore Cone Photoreceptor Visual Function in an Inherited Blindness Model

Abstract

Controversially, histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDACi) are in clinical trial for the treatment of inherited retinal degeneration. Utilizing the zebrafish dye ucd6 model, we determined if treatment with HDACi can rescue cone photoreceptor-mediated visual function. dye exhibit defective visual behaviour and retinal morphology including ciliary marginal zone (CMZ) cell death and decreased photoreceptor outer segment (OS) length, as well as gross morphological defects including hypopigmentation and pericardial oedema. HDACi treatment of dye results in significantly improved optokinetic (OKR) (~43 fold, p < 0.001) and visualmotor (VMR) (~3 fold, p < 0.05) responses. HDACi treatment rescued gross morphological defects and reduced CMZ cell death by 80%. Proteomic analysis of dye eye extracts suggested BDNF-TrkB and Akt signaling as mediators of HDACi rescue in our dataset. Co-treatment with the TrkB antagonist ANA-12 blocked HDACi rescue of visual function and associated Akt phosphorylation. Notably, sole treatment with a BDNF mimetic, 7,8-dihydroxyflavone hydrate, significantly rescued dye visual function (~58 fold increase in OKR, p < 0.001, ~3 fold increase in VMR, p < 0.05). In summary, HDACi and a BDNF mimetic are sufficient to rescue retinal cell death and visual function in a vertebrate model of inherited blindness.

Introduction

There is an unmet clinical need to develop effective treatments for inherited vision loss. Inherited retinal degenerations (iRD) are clinically and genetically heterogeneous, presenting as diverse forms of blindness that include retinitis pigmentosa (RP), Leber congenital amaurosis (LCA), achromatopsia (ACHM), cone-rod dystrophy (CORD) and macular dystrophy (MD)1. iRDs are estimated to affect 1 in every 2000–3000 people2, and many are characterised by loss and/or dysfunction of photoreceptor cells. Potential interventions include drug-, gene- or cell-based therapy3. Cell therapy has potential to restore functional retinal cells irrespective of the genetic cause of iRD4, 5. However, the integration of replacement progentitor photoreceptor cells which restored visual function in pre-clinical models6 has been challenged by evidence demonstrating intracellular exchange between donor and host cells7. Gene therapy demonstrated initial success in clinical trials8, 9. However, this approach is hampered by limited applicability due to genetic heterogeneity of iRD10. Additional concerns regarding long-term efficacy are exemplified by RPE65 gene replacement which fails to halt the progressive loss of photoreceptors11. An alternative to replacing defective cells or genes is to identify neuroprotective agents preventing loss of visual function12. Selection of neuroprotectants can be based on efficacy in other neurodegenerations or de novo discovery13. Neuroprotectants can modulate cell survival or death pathways common to many iRD, offering potential widespread applicability, irrespective of the genetic cause.

Previously reported retinal neuroprotectants include rod cone viability factor (rdCVF)14, brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), ciliary neurotrophic factor (CNTF)15, nicotinic acetylcholine or serotonin receptor agonists16, 17 and histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDACi). HDACi are clinically administered as mood stabilisers or anti-epileptic agents18 and are in clinical trials as anti-cancer19 or anti-inflammatory20 drugs. Notably, HDACi are under investigation to treat neurodegeneration in Alzheimer’s and Huntington’s disease21. Not suprisingly, HDACi recently emerged as potential drugs for iRD. A retrospective review of retinitis pigmentosa patients prescribed the HDACi valproic acid (VPA), showed improved visual field (VF) and visual acuity (VA) over an average 4 month treatment period22. The average optotype increased from 20/47 to 20/32. The study noted no negative effects on either VF or blood chemistry. Improvements in VF were clinically significant and indicates that VPA prevents progressive peripheral-central degeneration of retinal photoreceptor cells. However, multiple study criticisms include the small sample size, the short study period and the statistical methodology23. A similar retrospective review of a 9.8 month average treatment study suggests VPA has no beneficial effect on VF or VA readings24. Sisk et al. suggest HDACi treatment is appropriate for autosomal dominant RP acting to chaperone mutant rhodopsin, but may be harmful in autosomal recessive RP25. In summary, there is growing but conflicting evidence that HDACi are neuroprotective in a wide range of pre-clinical models of RP, retinal ischemia and retinal drug induced excitotoxicity2628.

Zebrafish provide novel opportunities to efficiently investigate vertebrate vision and pharmacological interventions in vivo 29. At 3 days post fertilisation (dpf), ocular morphogenesis is largely complete and a differentiated laminated retina prevails30. Vision in zebrafish larvae is cone-mediated, unlike nocturnal rodent models whose vision is largely rod-mediated31. The zebrafish retina is abundant in cone photoreceptors, arranged in mosaic patterns of red/green, blue, and UV subtypes in the photoreceptor cell layer32 and zebrafish models of inherited blindness (e.g. zatoichi s125, pde6c w59 and no optokinetic response f w21) demonstrate that genes essential for cone function (gc3, pde6 and gnat2) are functionally conserved between fish and humans3335. Convenient methods to assess visual function in zebrafish include behavioural assays or direct retinal electrophysiology3638.

Here, we demonstrate pharmacological rescue of cone-mediated vision in the dye ucd6 (https://zfin.org/ZDB-ALT-170502-2) zebrafish model of inherited blindness. HDACi treatment results in a rescue of some gross and retina-specific morphological defects, and significant improvement in visual function. Interrogation of proteomic datasets from treated and control dye mutants identified a correlation between upregulation of BDNF-TrkB signaling and HDACi mediated rescue of vision. The functional significance of BDNF-TrkB signaling was validated by reversal of HDACi-mediated improved vision when co-treated with ANA-12, a pharmacological antagonist of the TrkB receptor. Most significantly, treatment with a BDNF mimetic, 7,8-dihydroxyflavone hydrate (7,8-DHF), was sufficient to rescue visual function in dye larvae. In summary, characterisation of the mechanisms by which histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDACi) rescue visual impairment uncovered BDNF-TrkB signalling as necessary and sufficient to restore visual function in a model of inherited blindness.

Results

dye mutants display aberrant retinal morphology

The dying on edge (dye) mutant was uncovered during an F3 N-ethyl-N-nitrosourea (ENU) mutagenesis screen in zebrafish. At 5 days post fertilization (dpf), dye larvae exhibit slightly decreased body length and eye diameter, hypopigmentation, pericardial oedema and deflated swim bladder (Fig. 1a,b). In ultrathin retinal sections, dye display increased cell death in the CMZ indicated by pyknotic nuclei (Fig. 1d,f). In comparison to wildtype siblings (Fig. 1c,e), dye photoreceptor outer segments (OS) are decreased in length, lack an orderly tiered layering and are not orientated perpendicular to the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) (Fig. 1g,h). However, the OS ultrastructure presents with normal stacking of outer segment membranes (Fig. 1i,j). The RPE of dye is hypopigmented, and forms large intracellular inclusion bodies (Fig. 1k,l). Positional cloning localised dye to the atp6v0e1 gene and the causative mutation was identified as a 180 bp deletion (Fig. 1m–o) that removes the stop codon, a 15 bp sequence of the 3′ UTR, and the donor splice site from the exon 3-intron 3 boundary that is required for correct splicing of the atp6v0e1 mRNA (Fig. 1o). In agreement, RT-PCR demonstrated a large reduction of atp6v0e1 mRNA expression in dye compared to wildtype larvae (Supplementary Fig. S1) and similar morphological defects are present in other vacuolar ATPase subunit mutants39.

Figure 1
dye mutants display aberrant retinal morphology. Representative lateral and dorsal views in brightfield of sibling larvae (a,a′) and dye mutants (b,b′), displaying pigmentation and gross morphological defects present in the dye mutant, ...

dye mutants have significantly impaired cone photoreceptor-mediated visual function

To determine if dye have reduced visual function, we conducted OKR and VMR assays (Fig. 2). The OKR measures the ability to track objects by quantifying the number of saccadian eye movements a larva exhibits in response to a rotating grated stimulus36. Notably, 5 dpf dye display a ~98% reduction in OKR, producing an average of 0.33 (±0.67) saccades per minute (sacc./min.) compared to an average of 21.6 (±1.6) sacc./min. in unaffected siblings+/−,+/+ (Fig. 2a). The VMR quantifies larval locomotor activity in response to sudden changes in lighting37. Rapidly changing the environment to illuminated (ON response) or darkened (OFF response), results in a ‘startled’ behavioural response wherein locomotor activity is acutely increased. 5 dpf dye (blue trace, Fig. 2b) show reduced VMR activity with significantly reduced ON and OFF peak responses and no elevated light seeking behaviour in dark conditions compared to siblings (green trace, Fig. 2b). d y e exhibit a 79% reduction in the average MAX OFF VMR peak producing an average activity response of 0.055 (±0.013) ms/s compared to 0.259 (±0.049) ms/s in unaffected siblings (Fig. 2c). dye display an 85% reduction in the MAX ON VMR peak, responding with an average activity of 0.054 (±0.011) ms/s compared to 0.354 (±0.068) ms/s in unaffected siblings (Fig. 2d). dye also exhibit a defective electroretinogram (ERG), a more direct measurement of outer retinal function (Fig. 2e,f), with dye displaying reduced or absent b-waves in response to 20 millisecond flashes of increasing light intensity. In summary, visual behaviour assays and ERG measurements confirm dye have significantly impaired visual function. Notably, initiation of visual behaviour and retinal function in zebrafish larvae is predominantly mediated by cone and not rod photoreceptors35.

Figure 2
dye mutants exhibit reduced/absent visual behaviour. (a) dye mutants have a reduced/absent OKR compared to unaffected siblings, data represented using a box and whiskers plot, N = 15 (number of larvae per replicate), n = 3 ...

HDACi treatment restores retinal morphology and visual function in dye

As previous studies report histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDACi) to preserve retinal morphology in mouse models of rod photoreceptor degeneration26, we investigated the effects of a panel of HDACi on retinal morphology and cone-related visual function in dye. Initial dose-range finding (0.25–4 µM) assays indicated that 1 µM trichostatin A (TSA) was the maximum tolerated dose for zebrafish larvae submersed in the drug diluted in embryo medium. Strikingly, treatment with TSA acutely reversed many morphological defects observed in dye (Fig. 3a–i). Homozygous dye larvae treated with 1 µM TSA from 3–5 dpf present with increased tissue pigmentation, eye size and body length; inflated swim bladders; and reduced pericardial oedema (Fig. 3a–c). The genotype of dye larvae was validated by PCR showing that homozygous dye mutant DNA, but not sibling DNA, was negative for a 528 bp PCR amplicon encompassing exon 3 of the atp6v0e1 gene. By contrast, a β-actin control amplicon was present in all samples (Fig. 3d). Treatment with TSA also increases acetylation of histone 3 in dye (Fig. 3e). In the retina, the number of prominent photoreceptor outer segments is markedly increased following HDACi treatment (Fig. 3f,g). Cell death in the CMZ and peripheral retina is significantly reduced as evidenced by a reduction in the number of pyknotic nuclei (Red boxes, Fig. 3h,i, quantified in l) present in serial transverse sections from the central retina. However, RPE hypopigmentation and the presence of inclusion bodies is not rescued (Fig. 3j,k).

Figure 3
HDACi treatment rescues morphological and visual behaviour defects in dye mutants. (ac) Lateral bright field images of sibling control (a), dye mutant control (b) and 1 µM TSA treated dye (c). TSA treatment partially rescued gross ...

To determine if HDACi treatment can restore cone photoreceptor-mediated visual function in dye, visual behaviour in response to treatment with different HDACi was quantified using OKR and VMR assays (Fig. 3m,n). The average OKR response of dye is significantly rescued in response to 1 µM TSA (10.69 ± 2.12 sacc./min.) a HDAC class I/II inhibitor, 6 µM Scriptaid (9.53 ± 1.96 sacc./min.) a HDAC pan-inhibitor, 10 µM MC1568 (6.4 ± 2.66 sacc./min.) a HDAC class II selective inhibitor or 10 µM MS-275 (6.51 ± 2.24 sacc./min.) a HDAC class I selective inhibitor representing 42.8, 38.1, 25.2 and 25.7 fold average increases, respectively (Fig. 3m). In VMR assays, the MAX ON response is significantly rescued with 1 µM TSA (0.189 ± 0.058 ms/s) or 6 µM Scriptaid (0.221 ± 0.071) representing 2.5 and 3.1 fold increases in VMR, respectively (Fig. 3n). MC1568 and MS-275 also increase the MAX ON response but this did not achieve statistical significance. In summary, HDACi, particularly Class I/II inhibitors, rescue retinal morphology and restore visual behaviour in the dye model of inherited blindness.

Proteomic profiling, the HDACi molecular mechanism of rescue

To mechanistically understand how HDACi mediate rescue of visual function in dye, protein expression in the eye was profiled by mass spectrometry. 3 dpf dye larvae were treated with 1 µM TSA or vehicle control (0.1% DMSO) until 4 or 5 dpf. At 4 dpf, 1920 and 1905 proteins were identified from eyes of vehicle control or 1 µM TSA-treated dye, respectively (Fig. 4a, Supplementary data S1). Of the 1690 overlapping proteins within these datasets, 147 show significant (Fisher exact test p < 0.05) differential expression; 32 were decreased and 115 increased (Fig. 4b, Table 1). At the 5 dpf end point, 1923 and 1939 total proteins were identified from eyes of vehicle control or 1 µM TSA treated groups, respectively (Fig. 4a, Supplementary data S1). Of the 1511 overlapping proteins identified in both test groups, 131 proteins are significantly (Fisher exact test p < 0.05) differentially expressed; 51 decreased and 80 increased (Fig. 4c, Table 2). Cluster analysis of the differentially expressed proteins highlighted the concordance of the triplicate experiments for vehicle- or TSA-treated samples and identified sub-groups of ocular proteins exhibiting equivalent alterations in protein expression post HDACi treatment (Fig. 4b). To determine biological processes contributing to HDACi mediated rescue, enriched gene ontology terms were identified in DAVID-DB (Supplementary data S2) and PANTHER-DB (Fig. 4d,e) databases. For the significantly differentially expressed proteins at both time points, processes involved in initiation of transcription (nucleotide binding), protein translation (aminoacyl-tRNA ligase activity), visual perception and metabolism are over-represented in the dataset.

Figure 4
Identification of differentially expressed proteins in the eye following TSA treatment in dye mutants. (a) Schematic representation of LC:MS/MS experiments and analysis. 25 larvae from dye control and TSA treated groups were enucleated at 4 and 5 dpf ...
Table 1
Significantly differentially expressed eye proteins in TSA treated dye at 4 dpf.
Table 2
Significantly differentially expressed eye proteins in TSA treated dye at 5 dpf.

Differentially expressed proteins in response to HDACi treatment are linked to diverse functions including: i) anti-oxidant activity (mitochondrial NAD(P) transhydrogenase (Nnt): 1.5 fold increase); ii) metabolism (pyruvate carboxylase (Pcl): 1.48 fold increase); iii) mRNA processing (cleavage and polyadenylation specific factor 2 (Cpsf2): 1.4 fold increase), iv) transport (exportin 7 (Xpo7): 1.4 fold increase and solute carrier family members (Slc2a11b and Slc25a12): 1.3 fold increases), and v) unknown functions (Si:ch211-114c12.2: 1.6 fold decrease and Zgc:162944 protein: 1.4 fold increase).

Consistent with the improvement of visual function, many proteins increased in dye eyes following HDACi treatment are key mediators of phototransduction. These include: (a) light-sensitive G-protein coupled receptors, rhodopsin and opsin 1 short/medium/long wave sensitive 1/2 (Rho, Opn1sw1, Opn1mw2, Opn1lw1) exhibiting 1.8, 1.4, 1.7 and 1.6 fold increases, respectively); (b) visual effector G proteins, guanine nucleotide-binding protein G(t) subunit alpha-1/2 (Gnat1/2) exhibiting 1.5 and 1.2 fold increases, respectively); (c) phosphodiesterase a/b/c isoforms (Pde6a/b/c) exhibiting 1.6, 2.5 and 1.7 fold increases, respectively); (d) guanylyl cyclase 3 (Gc3) exhibiting a 2.4 fold increase); and (e) G protein-coupled receptor kinase 1 (Grk1) exhibiting a 1.8 fold increase). Other HDACi modulated proteins control photoreceptor development and morphogenesis including: peripherin 2 a/b (Prph2a/b) with 1.6 and 1.5 fold increases; dynein cytoplasmic 1 heavy chain 1 (Dync1h1) with 1.4 fold increase; lens crystallin beta A1-A2 Crystallin, scinderin like a, and gamma D-crystallin (Cryba1l, Scinla, Crygn2) with 2 and 2.5 fold increase or 1.6 fold decrease, respectively). Significantly differentially expressed proteins linked with neuroprotection include: heat shock protein 90 (Hsp90) with a 1.7 fold decrease and heat shock protein 70 (Hsp70) with a 1.3 fold increase. There is also a reduction in Caspase 3 (1.7 fold decrease) that correlates with the reduced cell death observed in the CMZ of dye mutants in response to HDACi treatment.

BDNF-TrkB signaling is central to HDACi mediated rescue in the dye

In order to delineate the signaling pathways mediating HDACi rescue of dye, the proteomic datasets were analysed using Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA) software. Upstream regulators of the effects observed in the dataset are inferred from changes in expression in downstream proteins. Additionally, the activation state of these inferred transcriptional regulators (ITRs) was predicted based on the abundance of downstream effector proteins. Brain derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), N-myc proto-oncogene (MYCN), myc proto-oncogene (MYC), tumor protein 53 (TP53) and RPTOR independent companion of MTOR, complex 2 (RICTOR) were identified as ITRs, as were several HDAC isoforms (Fig. 5a). In HDACi rescued dye, MYC, MYCN and TP53 signaling was predicted to be inhibited; in contrast, RICTOR and BDNF signaling was predicted to be activated (Fig. 5a). Consistent with this, BDNF-NTRK, PI3K and mTOR signaling were all differentially activated by our HDACi treatment (Fig. 5b). HDAC isoforms, HDAC1 and HDAC2 were predicted to be activated at the 4 dpf treatment endpoint, though this activation was reduced somewhat at the 5 dpf treatment endpoint. Conversely, HDAC3 is inhibited at both timepoints. As bdnf transcription is rapidly induced by HDACi treatment in cultured rat cortical neurons40 and is upstream of PI3K/AKT/RICTOR signaling we assessed the contribution of BDNF-TrkB signaling to in the rescue of vision in dye.

Figure 5
Identification and validation of HDACi mediated rescue pathway. (a) Activation/inhibition z-score plot of inferred transcriptional regulators (ITRs) in response to TSA treatment, at 4 and 5 dpf treatment end points in the dye mutant. ITRs were inferred ...

To validate the requirement of BDNF-TrkB signaling for the rescue of visual function, co-treatments were performed with ANA-12, a known pharmacological antagonist of the TrkB receptor. Visual response rescue following co-treatment with 1 µM TSA plus 100–500 nM ANA-12 was significantly reduced but not to untreated mutant levels, in a dose-dependent manner for both the OKR (69% maximum reduction) and MAX-ON response of the VMR (85% maximum reduction) compared to 1 µM TSA alone (Fig. 5c,d). ANA-12 co-treatment partially reversed the TSA-mediated rescue of cell death in the CMZ (Fig. 6i,j). To further validate the requirement of BDNF-TrkB, changes in protein expression in treated eye homogenates were examined (Fig. 5e,f ). In dye larvae treated only with 1 µM TSA, a significant 31% increase in Bdnf expression is observed compared to vehicle controls (Fig. 5e,f). In contrast, Bdnf expression was not significantly increased in 1 µM TSA + 500 nM ANA-12 co-treated dye larvae compared to vehicle controls (Fig. 5e,f). TrkB receptor expression remained consistent across treatments (Fig. 5e,f). As the PI3K/AKT pathway is activated downstream of BDNF-TrkB signaling, the phosphorylation status of Akt (Thr308) was examined. Compared to vehicle controls, 1 µM TSA treatment significantly increased phosphorylation of Akt by ~57%, which was blocked by 1 µM TSA + 500 nM ANA-12 co-treatment (Fig. 5e,f). Expression or phosphorylation of these proteins was not significantly altered in equivalent treatments of wildtype or heterozygous sibling larvae (Fig. 5e,f). A STRING-DB protein-protein interaction network was generated by combining the predicted or confirmed protein activation status or abundance in HDACi treated dye (Fig. 5g). Changes in expression/activation of proteins in this network are in agreement with activation of BDNF-TrkB signaling wherein HDACi treatment increases expression of BDNF, subsequently activating Ntrk2/TrkB then activation of Akt and inhibition of MycN, P53, Myc and HDAC3.

Figure 6
A BDNF mimetic treatment rescues visual function in dye mutants. (a,b) Gross morphology of control and 7,8-dihydroxyflavone hydrate (7,8-DHF) treated dye larvae, treatment does not rescue gross morphological defects. (c–h) Light micrographs of ...

A BDNF mimetic is sufficient to restore visual function in dye

Our data suggested HDACi mediated rescue was largely due to modulation of TrkB signaling via increased endogenous production of BDNF. Thus, dye were treated with a BDNF mimetic, 7,8-dihydroxyflavone hydrate (7,8-DHF). Treatment with 10 µM 7,8-DHF did not rescue gross morphological defects present in dye to a significant degree (Fig. 6a,b), conversely, retinal morphology was rescued (Fig. 6c,d,f,g) to a similar degree to HDACi treated dye larvae, including an 89% reduction in the number of dying cells present in the CMZ (red boxes, Fig. 6f,g, bar chart, i), and a 59% reduction in the size of the CMZ (j). Co-treatment with 500 nM ANA-12 partially blocked rescue of CMZ cell death (Fig. 6i, 72% reduction) and reduction in CMZ size (Fig. 6j, 41% reduction). Significantly, treatment with 10 µM 7,8-DHF rescued visual function as assessed by OKR (Fig. 6k) and VMR (Fig. 6l), in a dose-dependent manner. The degree of rescue with 7,8-DHF (57.58 fold increase in OKR, 3.89 and 3.33 fold increase in VMR MAX ON and MAX OFF activities, respectively) was greater than that observed by the most effective HDACi. In addition, co-treatment with 10 µM 7,8-DHF and 500 nM ANA-12 abrogated rescue of visual behaviour (71% reduction in OKR, 48% reduction in MAX OFF and 58% reduction in MAX ON VMR) (Fig. 6k,l). A comprehensive analysis of the visual behaviour responses, including dose-dependent improvements in OKR following HDACi or BDNF mimetic treatment is presented in Table 3.

Table 3
Summary of visual behaviour responses of HDACi treated dye mutants.

In summary, pathway analysis of dye proteomic datasets suggested BDNF-TrkB signaling as a mediator of HDACi rescue of visual function. The requirement and sufficiency of BDNF-TrkB signaling for rescue of visual function was confirmed experimentally by pharmacological intervention, biochemical analysis and visual behaviour assays.

Discussion

Currently, there are no approved pharmacological interventions to stabilise or improve visual function in patients with inherited blindness. Advantages of drug treatment include the ability to fine-tune effective and safe concentrations for each patient, to co-administer drug combinations, to incorporate sustained drug delivery devices and to stop treatment if ineffective or unsafe. However, identifying drugs that retain or restore visual function is challenging. Here, we demonstrate in a vertebrate model of inherited blindness that HDAC inhibitors and BDNF mimetics are sufficient to significantly improve cone-photoreceptor mediated visual function via a BDNF mediated signalling dependent mechanism of action.

Translating drug treatments for inherited blindness from research models to the clinic has been remarkably unsuccessful. In part, this reflects poor correlations between biochemical or morphological readouts of neuroprotection in research models and the more desirable clinical end-point of improved functional vision41, 42 Clinical setbacks can arise from trials on patients harbouring heterogenous genetic mutations that mask treatment efficacy, or poor ocular pharmacokinetics, resulting in optimal drug concentration of inefficient duration43, 44.

To enable efficient identification of drugs overcoming visual impairment, we applied the zebrafish dye model of inherited blindness coupled with established visual behaviour assays. Although dye is an imperfect model of retinal degeneration, it was chosen because i) the ~25% homozygous affected dye larvae can be reproducibly and easily phenotyped at 3 dpf; ii) dye larvae at 5 dpf exhibit pronounced visual behaviour and retinal morphology deficits, and iii) drug treatment of dye from 3–5 dpf followed by optokinetic or visualmotor response assays enable identification of small molecule drugs that prevent loss of visual function. The mutation in dye is caused by a 180 bp deletion in atp6v0e1, a vacuolar ATPase v0e1 subunit45, which affects splicing of atp6v0e1 transcripts into mature mRNA. Vacuolar ATPase complexes acidify organelles via transportation of H+ ions across vesicle membranes31. In the retina, disruption of this complex leads to phagocytosis defects and accumulation of undigested photoreceptor outer segments in the RPE. Defective outer segment phagocytosis is a hallmark of retinal diseases including RP and Usher syndrome type IB4648. N-retinylidene-N-retinylethanolamine (A2E), a major component of lipofuscin, is a potent inhibitor of v-ATPase activity and accumulation of lipofuscin is associated with age-related macular degeneration (AMD)49. In humans, mutations in V-ATPase a3 subunit cause osteopetrosis, wherein patients display visual impairment amongst other pathologies50. In the zebrafish eye, atp6v0d1 expression is restricted to the outer nuclear layer (ONL) and inner nuclear layer (INL) of the retina at 2 dpf39, and to the RPE from 3 dpf. atp6v0e1 shows a similar expression pattern from 3 dpf, where expression is mainly present in the RPE (Supplementary Fig. S1), Mutants of several other vacuolar ATPase subunits have similar retinal morphological defects to dye including RPE hypopigmentation, ciliary marginal zone cell death and abnormal photoreceptor morphology39. Defects in photoreceptor morphology are likely explained by aggregate accumulation in the RPE/photoreceptors, degradation of which is perturbed by an inability to acidify lysosomes. CMZ cell death affects a subpopulation of progenitor cells in the teleost retina51, 52 though it is currently unknown how the dye mutation impacts survival of these cells. Significantly, 5 dpf dye larvae recapitulate clinical features of human blindness including significantly attenuated vision. In dye electroretinograms, significantly diminished b-wave amplitudes are observed, indicating defective photoreceptor-induced depolarisation of bipolar cells. This is consistent with ERG recordings from alternative zebrafish models of blindness including mutations in other vacuolar ATPase subunits39, the noir mutant arising from defective pyruvate dehydrogenase metabolism53 and mutations of the SNARE complex, formation of which required for synaptic vesicle fusion54. Importantly, dye larvae exhibit impaired visual behaviour in optokinetic and visualmotor responses. These technically simpler and higher throughput assays are compatible with drug screening. In summary, the dye zebrafish model of inherited blindness is appropriate to incorporate into efficient phenotype-based screens to identify drugs that preserve or restore visual function.

In dye, HDACi treatment is sufficient to restore visual function. HDACi were chosen due to the contradictory reports in the literature regarding their efficacy and safety in clinical trials of patients with inherited sight loss and concerns over patients self-medicating with unapproved HDACi2225. Significantly, HDACi rescues some features of retinal morphology, but robustly rescues visual responses. Previous studies report HDACi to preserve rod photoreceptor morphology ex vivo but this report demonstrates an improvement of visual function. In agreement, HDACi increased expression of phototransduction proteins including phosphodiesterase, opsin, transducin and peripherin isoforms. Despite the efficacy of HDACi in restoring visual function, translation to clinical intervention for patients with inherited sight loss is justifiably occluded due to ongoing safety and specificity concerns22, 23. Thus, we sought to identify alternative key signaling nodes that are sufficient to recapitulate the HDACi rescue.

Bioinformatic analysis unmasked Bdnf, Myc, MycN, Tp53 and RICTOR signaling as transcriptional regulators predicted to mediate the rescue of visual function by HDACi. Of the identified signalling mechanisms, the most notable was the correlation between visual rescue and BDNF signaling. BDNF is a neurotrophic growth factor whose mature form binds the tropomyosin related kinase B (TrkB) receptor. BDNF-TrkB signaling has diverse physiological functions, including regulation of photoreceptor development and maintenance10. For instance, TrkB null mice develop shortened photoreceptor outer segments55. In the adult rat retina, BDNF and TrkB co-localise in green-red-sensitive cone photoreceptor outer segments56. In developing zebrafish, Bdnf localisation is observed in the outer nuclear layer (ONL), outer plexiform layer (OPL) and inner plexiform layer (IPL), while TrkB localisation is restricted to the IPL57, suggesting that ganglion or Müller cells receive the BDNF signal in the retina. We speculate that cell signalling pathways activated by agonism of the TrkB receptor on ganglion or glial cells culminates in release of trophic factors that support photoreceptors, a mechanism reported in models of light-induced photoreceptor degeneration58.

BDNF transcription is known to be induced by HDACi treatment in cultured rat cortical neurons mediated by the CREB transcription factor40, and in combination with ciliary neurotrophic factor (CNTF), BDNF reduces cell death in rd1 mouse retinal explants15. Furthermore, small molecule BDNF mimetics are neuroprotective in mammalian models of traumatic brain injury59, 60. Here, pharmacological approaches demonstrated the necessity and sufficiency of BDNF-TrkB signaling for visual rescue in dye larvae. ANA-12, a TrkB receptor antagonist blocked HDACi mediated rescue by 69% and 85% in OKR and VMR assays respectively. Critically, 7,8-dihydroxyflavone hydrate, a TrkB receptor agonist or BDNF mimetic is sufficient to restore visual function and reduce CMZ cell death in the dye model of inherited sight loss. Co-treatment with 7,8-DHF and ANA-12 blocked rescue of visual function (71% and ~54% decrease in OKR and VMR respectively, compared to 10 µM 7,8-DHF only treated larvae), with partial rescue of dying cells in the CMZ. Treatment appears to result in a decrease in the size of the CMZ, which is partially blocked by ANA-12 co-treatment. A summary of the signaling networks involved in HDACi and BDNF mimetic mediated rescue is presented in Supplementary Fig. S2. Our findings support the conclusion that BDNF-mediated retinal neuroprotection is conserved in zebrafish and mammalian models, highlighting the applicability of zebrafish as a model for translational neurodegeneration research.

BDNF mimetics offer an exciting alternative approach to treating sight loss. They offer a more selective approach than HDACi which have diverse target profiles and global effects on gene expression. BDNF was identified as a photoreceptor protectant over 20 years ago12 but translational studies delivering BDNF in biological forms were hampered by pharmacokinetic issues6163. Small molecule BDNF mimetics can circumvent these issues as they: i) protect vision in vivo, ii) cross the blood-tissue barriers iii) can be delivered directly to the eye and iv) are more stable than BDNF. BDNF mimetics are well tolerated in mammalian models, demonstrate efficacy in rodent models of Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s and Huntington’s disease and no adverse outcomes are reported for humans consuming 7,8 dihydroxyflavone as a nootropic supplement.

Materials and Methods

Ethics Statement

All experiments carried out on animals were performed according to ethical approval granted by the UCD Animal Research Ethics Committee. Zebrafish in the first 5 days of life are not capable of feeding independently. The UCD Policy on the use of Animals for Research & Teaching states that “Protected animals are those which have the capacity to experience pain, suffering, distress or lasting harm as a result of procedures which may be carried out in the course of research or teaching.” … “Larval stages of fish are judged to be capable of experiencing pain, suffering or distress once they are capable of feeding independently”. As zebrafish larvae under 5 days post fertilization were used in all experiments, no protected animals were used and experiments were not subject to full ethical review.

N-nitroso-N-ethylurea (ENU) mutagenesis screen

Male zebrafish of the AB genetic background were treated for 1 hour with 3 mM ENU (Sigma) diluted in 10 mM sodium phosphate buffer, pH 6.6. This treatment was repeated 4 times at 7–14 day intervals. Treated males were mated and embryos were grown up to generate F1 founders outcrossed to wildtype fish generating F2 families. F3 offspring were screened for recessive mutations using the optokinetic response (OKR) assay. Carriers of mutations were crossed to wildtype Tubingen fish to generate hybrid carriers. These carriers were incrossed and their mutant and normal offspring were collected for phenotyping and genotyping.

Identification of dye mutation

Genomic DNA was isolated from larval zebrafish using a DNeasy Blood and tissue kit (Qiagen) according to manufacturer’s instructions. DNA concentration was determined by spectrophotometry using a Nano-drop 2000 (Thermo Scientific). PCR utilised the Crimson-Taq DNA polymerase system (New England Biolabs). Extracted DNA was used for bulk segregation analysis using Z-markers as described in Sapetto-Rebow, et al.64. Within the genomic lesion, atp6v0e1 was selected for further interrogation. Primers used for genotyping include: atp6v0e1 A forward: AGAACCACTGCCAGAACC atp6v0e1 A reverse: CGGTTCTGTAGAGCAGAAGA, atp6v0e1 B forward: AGAGAGAAGAGGAAGAGCCA atp6v0e1 B reverse: TAGAGCGGAACAGGAATCAC, atp6v0e1 C forward: CCATCTGGTACCTGTACTACC, atp6v0e1 C reverse: ATTTTGAGGAAACAACACCGAG, atp6v0e1 D forward: TGACTTGACGCCTGAAGTATTA, atp6v0e1 D reverse: AGTTCTCGTAGACCTGTTAGC, atp6v0e1 E forward: GGAGGATGGTCCAGTAACAG atp6v0e1 E reverse: GTGTCGGTACTGCTCTCAG, Exon 2-3 atp6v0e1 forward: GCTGGTTCTGACTGCTGTCTGCT, exon 2-3 atp6v0e1 reverse: GTGGCGACGGGTGTTCAGGG, β-actin forward: TGGCCCATCCATCGTTCACAGGA, β-actin reverse: CGCATCCTGAGTCAATGCGCCA. PCR products were run on a 1.2% agarose gel containing 0.2 μg/mL ethidium bromide and visualised using a Gene Genius Bioimaging System (Syngene). For identification of the dye deletion, PCR amplicons from pooled dye and WT larvae, generated using the atp6v0e1 C primer pairs were extracted and purified using a GeneJet gel extraction kit (Fisher) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. DNA amplicons were sequenced on an Illumina platform (Source BioScience, Republic of Ireland). Alignments of the resulting sequence data were generated using MultAlin software65.

RNA extraction and RT-PCR

RNA was extracted from 50 pooled whole larvae using Qiashredder columns (Qiagen, Germany) and an RNeasy Mini kit (Qiagen, Germany) in an RNase free environment. RNA samples were quantified using the Nanodrop ND-100 and RNA samples were reverse transcribed into cDNA using the Superscript III First-Strand Synthesis System (Invitrogen). Briefly, each RNA sample was mixed with 5 µM oligo(dT)primer and 1 mM dNTP mix in DEPC-treated water. Samples were incubated at 65 °C for 5 minutes and cooled on ice. A cDNA synthesis mix containing RT buffer, MgCl2, DTT, RNase OUT and Superscript III reverse transcriptase enzyme was added to each sample. Samples were incubated at 50 °C for 50 minutes and reactions were terminated at 85 °C for 5 minutes. Negative controls were synthesised in the same way without Superscript III enzyme. PCR was carried out on the resulting cDNA samples and amplification products were analysed on an agarose gel. Primers used for RT-PCR: tcerg1 forward: AGCTCTACAGACGTCACTCCCCC, tcerg1 reverse: TGTGTGTGTTCACGCAGCATCAGT, atp6v0e1 forward: GCGATCGCGGTGATGACCCT and atp6v0e1 reverse: GCAGACAGCAGTCAGAACCAGCA.

Zebrafish maintenance

Heterozygous dye carriers were maintained as inbred stocks. Matings were carried out by transferring adult fish to mating tanks. Embryos were obtained by natural spawning and raised in petri-dishes containing standard embryo medium solution (0.137 M NaCl, 5.4 mM KCl, 5.5 mM Na2HPO4, 0.44 mM KH2PO4, 1.3 mM CaCl2, 1.0 mM MgSO4 and 4.2 mM NaHCO3, conductivity 1200 µs, pH 7.2) at 28.5 °C on a 14/10 hour light/dark cycle until 3 days post fertilization (dpf).

Drug treatments

At 3 dpf dye larvae were separated from unaffected sibling larvae based on phenotype. dye mutants and siblings were treated with either 1 µM Trichostatin A (TSA, Sigma) with or without 100–500 nM ANA-12, 6 µM Scriptaid (Sigma), 10 µM MC1568 (Tocris Biosciences), 10 µM MS275 (Cayman Chemicals), 10 µM 7,8-dihydroxyflavone hydrate (Sigma) or 0.1% dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) vehicle control in a final concentration of 0.1% v/v DMSO/embryo medium solution. Optimum drug concentrations for treatments were determined by prior treatment with 0.25–4 µM TSA, 2-10 µM Scriptaid, 5–20 µM MC1568 and 5-20 µM MS275, 2.5–10 µM 7,8-dihydroxyflavone hydrate, and assessment of defects in gross morphology and optokinetic response. For each treatment 12 larvae were transferred to 10 mL drug solution in a 60 × 15 mm petri dish, sealed in a container, and incubated under standard conditions stated above until 5 dpf.

Visual behaviour assays

At 5 dpf, HDACi-treated larvae were removed from drug solutions and transferred to embryo medium for behavioural analyses. In the optokinetic response (OKR) assay, individual larvae were transferred to a petri dish containing 9% methylcellulose for immobilisation, and placed inside a circular grated pattern comprising 18° black and white stripes. The pattern was rotated at 18 rpm for 30 seconds clockwise and 30 seconds anti-clockwise. The number of saccadian eye movements per minute was recorded manually. For the visual motor response (VMR) assay, treated larvae were transferred in 600 µL embryo medium to individual wells of a 96 well clear polystyrene plate (Whatman). The plate was placed in the Zebrabox® recording chamber (Viewpoint Life Sciences) and locomotor activity quantified in response to changing light conditions by a motion detecting infrared camera. Detection parameters and analysis was performed as described previously by Deeti, et al.66. All statistical analyses were performed in Graphpad Prism V6. A Kruskal-Wallis one-way analysis of variance with post-hoc Dunn’s multiple comparison test was performed for visual function data, comparing dye control larvae to all other groups unless otherwise stated67.

Electroretinography

Larvae were dark adapted for 30 minutes and paralysed with 0.5 mg/mL mivacurium chloride (Mivacron), the dark-adapted status was maintained throughout the handling and measurement processes. The reference electrode was placed in E3 medium, the recording electrode was filled with 0.9% saline solution and positioned on the center of the cornea using a micromanipulator and amplified with a P55 pre-amplifier (Grass Instruments). A 300 W halogen light source was used for light stimulation. The maximum light intensity stimulus was 2.8 × 103 µW/cm2 with a 20 ms flash duration at all intensities (controlled by a S48 stimulator (Grass Instruments). Three optical density filters produced flash intensities at −3.0, −2.0, −1.0 and −0 log of the maximum. Recordings were analysed as previously described68. Raw data from dye mutants and siblings was compared using a 2-sample t-test with unequal variances.

Histological analysis

Samples were fixed overnight in 4% paraformaldehyde and 2.5% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M Sorenson phosphate buffer at pH 7.3. For bright-field imaging, samples were washed in PBS and imaged using an Olympus SZX10 microscope. For light microscopy, samples were post-fixed in 1% osmium tetraoxide and dehydrated in gradient ascending series of ethanol concentrations prior to Epon 812 resin embedding overnight. 1 µm sections were prepared using a Leica EM UC6 microtome and glass knife, mounted on glass slides and stained with toluidine blue. Prepared sections were imaged by a Leica DMLB bright field illumination microscope and Leica DFC 480 camera. The number of dying cells in the ciliary marginal zone (CMZ) was quantified by recording pyknotic nuclei present in sections 5 µm apart surrounding the optic nerve. The area of the CMZ was measured in central retinal sections using the polygonal selection tool in imagej, morphology data was analysed using an ordinary one-way ANOVA. The area of the CMZ was determined according to the criteria in Raymond, et al.69. For transmission electron microscopy (TEM), 0.1 µm sections were prepared using a Leica EM UC6 microtome and diamond knife, transferred to a support grid, contrasted with uranyl acetate and lead citrate, and analysed on a FEI-Tecnai 12 BioTwin transmission electron microscope (FEI Electron Optics).

Protein extraction and western blot

4 and 5 dpf HDACi-treated or control larvae were euthanised using 4% Tricaine, and transferred to protease inhibitor solution (cOmplete™, Mini Protease Inhibitor Cocktail, Sigma). Larvae eyes were enucleated. 50 larval eyes were sonicated at 5% amplitude for 10-15 s using a Soni-prep 150 (Sanyo) in 80 µL of either protease inhibitor solution or lysis buffer (50 mM HEPES/KOH pH 7.2, 5 mM EGTA, 10 mM KCl, 2 mM MgCl2, 0.1% CHAPS). Protein concentration was determined by Bicinchoninic Acid assay (Pierce). 20 µg protein extracts were prepared in SDS-sample buffer (10% v/v Glycerol, 7 mM SDS, 62.5 µM Tris-HCl pH 6.8, 75 µM bromophenol blue, 5 mM DTT) and boiled at 95 °C for 5 minutes. Samples were centrifuged at 14,000 RPM for 8 minutes to remove excess pigment and cell debris. Protein samples were separated on a 0.75 mm 12% Bis/Tris acrylamide SDS-PAGE resolving gel for 1 hour in running buffer (3.5 mM SDS, 25 mM Tris base, 0.2 M Glycine) and transferred to polyvinylidene fluoride membrane at 100 V for 1 hour in transfer buffer (25 mM Tris base, 0.2 M glycine) using a mini-PROTEAN 3 module and mini Trans-blot cell (Biorad). Membranes were blocked in 5% milk solution for 1 hour, and probed with primary antibodies for acetyl-Histone H3 (Lys9) (1:1000, Millipore #07-352), BDNF (1:500, Millipore, #AB1534), Trkb (1:500, Santa-Cruz, #sc-12), phospho-Akt (1:1000, Cell Signaling Technologies, #9275), Akt (1:1000, Cell Signaling Technologies, #9272) and β-actin (1:1000, Sigma, A5441) overnight. Following washes in PBS-T, membranes were incubated in horseradish peroxidase (HRP) conjugated secondary antibody (Goat anti-rabbit, Amersham, #NIF825; Goat anti-mouse, Amersham, #NA934VS) for 2–4 hours, washes repeated, and placed in enhanced chemiluminescence western blotting detection reagent (Amersham). HRP activity was recorded by a LAS-3000 bioluminescence imager. Densitometry was performed in ImageJ and relative optical-density was normalised to β-actin or total Akt expression. Western blot data was analysed in Graphpad Prism V6 using a two-tailed paired t-test.

Proteomic analysis

Protein from 50 homogenised larval eyes was isolated with the addition of trichloroacetic acid (TCA, 20%), reduced using 200 mM dithiothreitol, alkylated with 200 mM iodoacetamide and digested overnight with trypsin (Sigma). Peptides were desalted with C18 STAGE tips70 and resuspended in 0.1% TFA. For mass spectrometry peptide fractions were analyzed on a quadrupole Orbitrap (Q-Exactive, Thermo Scientific) mass spectrometer equipped with a reversed-phase NanoLC UltiMate 3000 HPLC system (Thermo Scientific). Peptide samples were loaded onto C18 reversed phase columns (5 cm length, 75 µm inner diameter). Raw data from the Orbitrap Q-Exactive was processed using MaxQuant version 1.5.1.071, incorporating the Andromeda search engine71, 72, incorporating the Andromeda search engine72. To identify peptides and proteins, MS/MS spectra were matched to the UniProt Danio rerio database. All searches were performed with tryptic specificity allowing two missed cleavages. The database searches were performed with carbamidomethyl (C) as fixed modification and acetylation (protein N terminus) and oxidation (M) as variable modifications. For the generation of label free quantitative (LFQ) ion intensities for protein profiles, signals of corresponding peptides in different nano-HPLC MS/MS runs were matched by MaxQuant applying a mass accuracy of at least 20 ppm and a maximum time window of 1 min73. Perseus statistical software (version 1.4.1.3) analysed the LFQ intensities73. Perseus statistical software (version 1.4.1.3) analysed the LFQ intensities74. Protein identifications were filtered to eliminate the identifications from the reverse database and common contaminants. Data was log transformed and t-test comparison of fractions carried out. For visualization using heat maps, missing values were imputed with values from a normal distribution and the dataset was normalized by z-score75. Gene ontology terms were identified and visualised by submitting identified gene lists to DAVID and PANTHER databases.

Pathway analysis

Ingenuity Pathway analysis (IPA) was used to identify inferred transcriptional regulators (ITRs) of differentially expressed genes in the datasets. Statistical algorithms match each gene symbol, fold change value and ANOVA p-value to corresponding objects in the curated IPA knowledge database, which is then used to identify shared regulators of genes in the dataset and are assigned a score based on relevance to input genes. This analysis also infers activation status of upstream regulators based on abundance of downstream transcriptional targets. Top ITRs were included in bar-charts with the predicted activation status score. ITRs and their predicted activation status and western blot data was collated and used to generate an interaction network using STRING database.

Electronic supplementary material

Acknowledgements

UCD Conway Institute Imaging Core, with particular thanks to Dimitri Scholz, Tiina O’Neill and Katarzyna Welzel for LM/EM preparation and imaging. This project was supported by Fighting Blindness MRCG/HRB grant MRCG-2014-3.b and Science Foundation Ireland (SFI) under Grant Number 14/IA/2395.

Author Contributions

Author Contributions

C.D., L.S., S.D. and T.H., optimisation and analysis of visual function assays and drug treatment protocol. C.D. and L.S., retinal histology. A.R. and J.O.C., ERG data. E.D. and G.C., proteomics experiments and analysis. D.D. and W.K., pathway analysis. C.D., biochemical analyses. C.D. and B.N.K., experimental design. C.D. and B.N.K. wrote the paper. All authors reviewed the manuscript.

Notes

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Footnotes

Electronic supplementary material

Supplementary information accompanies this paper at doi:10.1038/s41598-017-11513-5

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

1. Nash BM, Wright DC, Grigg JR, Bennetts B, Jamieson RV. Retinal dystrophies, genomic applications in diagnosis and prospects for therapy. Transl Pediatr. 2015;4:139–163. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
2. Sohocki MM, et al. Prevalence of mutations causing retinitis pigmentosa and other inherited retinopathies. Human mutation. 2001;17:42–51. doi: 10.1002/1098-1004(2001)17:1<42::AID-HUMU5>3.0.CO;2-K. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
3. Veleri S, et al. Biology and therapy of inherited retinal degenerative disease: insights from mouse models. Dis Model Mech. 2015;8:109–129. doi: 10.1242/dmm.017913. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
4. Lamba DA, Karl MO, Ware CB, Reh TA. Efficient generation of retinal progenitor cells from human embryonic stem cells. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2006;103:12769–12774. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0601990103. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
5. MacLaren RE, et al. Retinal repair by transplantation of photoreceptor precursors. Nature. 2006;444:203–207. doi: 10.1038/nature05161. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
6. Canola K, Arsenijevic Y. Generation of cells committed towards the photoreceptor fate for retinal transplantation. Neuroreport. 2007;18:851–855. doi: 10.1097/WNR.0b013e32815277c1. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
7. Santos-Ferreira T, et al. Retinal transplantation of photoreceptors results in donor-host cytoplasmic exchange. Nat Commun. 2016;7:13028. doi: 10.1038/ncomms13028. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
8. Bainbridge JW, et al. Effect of gene therapy on visual function in Leber’s congenital amaurosis. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:2231–2239. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0802268. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
9. Maguire AM, et al. Safety and efficacy of gene transfer for Leber’s congenital amaurosis. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:2240–2248. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0802315. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
10. Hartong DT, Berson EL, Dryja TP. Retinitis pigmentosa. Lancet. 2006;368:1795–1809. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69740-7. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
11. Bundey S, Crews SJ. A study of retinitis pigmentosa in the City of Birmingham. I Prevalence. Journal of medical genetics. 1984;21:417–420. doi: 10.1136/jmg.21.6.417. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
12. LaVail MM, et al. Multiple growth factors, cytokines, and neurotrophins rescue photoreceptors from the damaging effects of constant light. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1992;89:11249–11253. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.23.11249. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
13. Zhang K, Zhang L, Weinreb RN. Ophthalmic drug discovery: novel targets and mechanisms for retinal diseases and glaucoma. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2012;11:541–559. doi: 10.1038/nrd3745. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
14. Leveillard T, et al. Identification and characterization of rod-derived cone viability factor. Nature genetics. 2004;36:755–759. doi: 10.1038/ng1386. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
15. Azadi S, et al. CNTF+BDNF treatment and neuroprotective pathways in the rd1 mouse retina. Brain research. 2007;1129:116–129. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.10.031. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
16. Wen R, Cheng T, Li Y, Cao W, Steinberg RH. Alpha 2-adrenergic agonists induce basic fibroblast growth factor expression in photoreceptors in vivo and ameliorate light damage. The Journal of neuroscience: the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience. 1996;16:5986–5992. [PubMed]
17. Collier RJ, et al. Agonists at the serotonin receptor (5-HT(1A)) protect the retina from severe photo-oxidative stress. Investigative ophthalmology & visual science. 2011;52:2118–2126. doi: 10.1167/iovs.10-6304. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
18. Muzina, D. J., Elhaj, O., Gajwani, P., Gao, K. & Calabrese, J. R. Lamotrigine and antiepileptic drugs as mood stabilizers in bipolar disorder. Acta Psychiatr Scand Suppl, 21–28, doi:10.1111/j.1600-0447.2005.00523.x (2005). [PubMed]
19. Minucci S, Pelicci PG. Histone deacetylase inhibitors and the promise of epigenetic (and more) treatments for cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2006;6:38–51. doi: 10.1038/nrc1779. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
20. Adcock IM. HDAC inhibitors as anti-inflammatory agents. Br J Pharmacol. 2007;150:829–831. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0707166. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
21. Hahnen E, et al. Histone deacetylase inhibitors: possible implications for neurodegenerative disorders. Expert Opin Investig Drugs. 2008;17:169–184. doi: 10.1517/13543784.17.2.169. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
22. Clemson CM, et al. Therapeutic potential of valproic acid for retinitis pigmentosa. The British journal of ophthalmology. 2011;95:89–93. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2009.175356. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
23. van Schooneveld, M. J., van den Born, L. I., van Genderen, M. & Bollemeijer, J. G. The conclusions of Clemson et al. concerning valproic acid are premature. The British journal of ophthalmology95, 153; author reply 153–154, doi:10.1136/bjo.2010.194373 (2011). [PubMed]
24. Bhalla S, et al. Long-term follow-up for efficacy and safety of treatment of retinitis pigmentosa with valproic acid. The British journal of ophthalmology. 2013;97:895–899. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2013-303084. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
25. Sisk RA. Valproic acid treatment may be harmful in non-dominant forms of retinitis pigmentosa. The British journal of ophthalmology. 2012;96:1154–1155. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2012-301950. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
26. Sancho-Pelluz, J. et al. Excessive HDAC activation is critical for neurodegeneration in the rd1 mouse. Cell Death Dis1, doi:10.1038/cddis.2010.4 (2010). [PMC free article] [PubMed]
27. Crosson CE, Mani SK, Husain S, Alsarraf O, Menick DR. Inhibition of histone deacetylase protects the retina from ischemic injury. Investigative ophthalmology & visual science. 2010;51:3639–3645. doi: 10.1167/iovs.09-4538. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
28. Kimura A, et al. Valproic Acid Prevents NMDA-Induced Retinal Ganglion Cell Death via Stimulation of Neuronal TrkB Receptor Signaling. The American journal of pathology. 2014 [PubMed]
29. Chhetri J, Jacobson G, Gueven N. Zebrafish-on the move towards ophthalmological research. Eye. 2014 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
30. Kimmel CB, Ballard WW, Kimmel SR, Ullmann B, Schilling TF. Stages of embryonic development of the zebrafish. Developmental dynamics: an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists. 1995;203:253–310. doi: 10.1002/aja.1002030302. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
31. Bibliowicz J, Tittle RK, Gross JM. Toward a better understanding of human eye disease insights from the zebrafish, Danio rerio. Progress in molecular biology and translational science. 2011;100:287–330. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-384878-9.00007-8. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
32. Vihtelic TS, Doro CJ, Hyde DR. Cloning and characterization of six zebrafish photoreceptor opsin cDNAs and immunolocalization of their corresponding proteins. Visual neuroscience. 1999;16:571–585. doi: 10.1017/S0952523899163168. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
33. Muto A, et al. Forward genetic analysis of visual behavior in zebrafish. Plos Genet. 2005;1:e66. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.0010066. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
34. Stearns G, Evangelista M, Fadool JM, Brockerhoff SE. A mutation in the cone-specific pde6 gene causes rapid cone photoreceptor degeneration in zebrafish. J Neurosci. 2007;27:13866–13874. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3136-07.2007. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
35. Kennedy BN, et al. Identification of a zebrafish cone photoreceptor-specific promoter and genetic rescue of achromatopsia in the nof mutant. Investigative ophthalmology & visual science. 2007;48:522–529. doi: 10.1167/iovs.06-0975. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
36. Brockerhoff SE. Measuring the optokinetic response of zebrafish larvae. Nature protocols. 2006;1:2448–2451. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2006.255. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
37. Emran F, Rihel J, Dowling JE. A behavioral assay to measure responsiveness of zebrafish to changes in light intensities. Journal of visualized experiments: JoVE. 2008 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
38. Saszik S, Bilotta J, Givin CM. ERG assessment of zebrafish retinal development. Visual neuroscience. 1999;16:881–888. doi: 10.1017/S0952523899165076. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
39. Nuckels RJ, Ng A, Darland T, Gross JM. The vacuolar-ATPase complex regulates retinoblast proliferation and survival, photoreceptor morphogenesis, and pigmentation in the zebrafish eye. Investigative ophthalmology & visual science. 2009;50:893–905. doi: 10.1167/iovs.08-2743. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
40. Koppel I, Timmusk T. Differential regulation of Bdnf expression in cortical neurons by class-selective histone deacetylase inhibitors. Neuropharmacology. 2013;75:106–115. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2013.07.015. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
41. Wenzel A, Grimm C, Samardzija M, Reme CE. Molecular mechanisms of light-induced photoreceptor apoptosis and neuroprotection for retinal degeneration. Progress in retinal and eye research. 2005;24:275–306. doi: 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2004.08.002. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
42. Chen D, et al. Division and apoptosis of E2f-deficient retinal progenitors. Nature. 2009;462:925–929. doi: 10.1038/nature08544. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
43. Edelhauser HF, et al. Ophthalmic drug delivery systems for the treatment of retinal diseases: basic research to clinical applications. Investigative ophthalmology & visual science. 2010;51:5403–5420. doi: 10.1167/iovs.10-5392. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
44. Sacchetti M, Mantelli F, Merlo D, Lambiase A. Systematic Review of Randomized Clinical Trials on Safety and Efficacy of Pharmacological and Nonpharmacological Treatments for Retinitis Pigmentosa. J Ophthalmol. 2015;2015:737053. doi: 10.1155/2015/737053. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
45. Forgac M. Structure and properties of the vacuolar (H+)-ATPases. The Journal of biological chemistry. 1999;274:12951–12954. doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.19.12951. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
46. Kaarniranta K, et al. Autophagy and heterophagy dysregulation leads to retinal pigment epithelium dysfunction and development of age-related macular degeneration. Autophagy. 2013;9:973–984. doi: 10.4161/auto.24546. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
47. Nandrot EF. Animal Models, in “The Quest to Decipher RPE Phagocytosis” Adv Exp Med Biol. 2014;801:77–83. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4614-3209-8_10. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
48. Gibbs D, Kitamoto J, Williams DS. Abnormal phagocytosis by retinal pigmented epithelium that lacks myosin VIIa, the Usher syndrome 1B protein. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2003;100:6481–6486. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1130432100. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
49. Boyer NP, et al. Lipofuscin and A2E accumulate with age in the retinal pigment epithelium of Nrl−/− mice. Photochem Photobiol. 2012;88:1373–1377. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-1097.2012.01127.x. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
50. Steward CG. Neurological aspects of osteopetrosis. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol. 2003;29:87–97. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2990.2003.00474.x. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
51. Lodrini M, et al. MYCN and HDAC2 cooperate to repress miR-183 signaling in neuroblastoma. Nucleic acids research. 2013;41:6018–6033. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkt346. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
52. Kubota R, Hokoc JN, Moshiri A, McGuire C, Reh TA. A comparative study of neurogenesis in the retinal ciliary marginal zone of homeothermic vertebrates. Brain research. Developmental brain research. 2002;134:31–41. doi: 10.1016/S0165-3806(01)00287-5. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
53. Maurer CM, Schonthaler HB, Mueller KP, Neuhauss SC. Distinct retinal deficits in a zebrafish pyruvate dehydrogenase-deficient mutant. J Neurosci. 2010;30:11962–11972. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2848-10.2010. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
54. Fleisch VC, Schonthaler HB, von Lintig J, Neuhauss SC. Subfunctionalization of a retinoid-binding protein provides evidence for two parallel visual cycles in the cone-dominant zebrafish retina. The Journal of neuroscience: the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience. 2008;28:8208–8216. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2367-08.2008. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
55. Rohrer B, Ogilvie JM. Retarded outer segment development in TrkB knockout mouse retina organ culture. Molecular vision. 2003;9:18–23. [PubMed]
56. Di Polo A, Cheng L, Bray GM, Aguayo AJ. Colocalization of TrkB and brain-derived neurotrophic factor proteins in green-red-sensitive cone outer segments. Investigative ophthalmology & visual science. 2000;41:4014–4021. [PubMed]
57. Germana A, et al. Expression and cell localization of brain-derived neurotrophic factor and TrkB during zebrafish retinal development. Journal of anatomy. 2010;217:214–222. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7580.2010.01268.x. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
58. Gauthier R, Joly S, Pernet V, Lachapelle P, Di Polo A. Brain-derived neurotrophic factor gene delivery to muller glia preserves structure and function of light-damaged photoreceptors. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005;46:3383–3392. doi: 10.1167/iovs.05-0362. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
59. Massa SM, et al. Small molecule BDNF mimetics activate TrkB signaling and prevent neuronal degeneration in rodents. The Journal of clinical investigation. 2010;120:1774–1785. doi: 10.1172/JCI41356. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
60. Webster NJ, Pirrung MC. Small molecule activators of the Trk receptors for neuroprotection. BMC neuroscience. 2008;9(Suppl 2):S1. doi: 10.1186/1471-2202-9-S2-S1. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
61. Pardridge WM, Wu D, Sakane T. Combined use of carboxyl-directed protein pegylation and vector-mediated blood-brain barrier drug delivery system optimizes brain uptake of brain-derived neurotrophic factor following intravenous administration. Pharm Res. 1998;15:576–582. doi: 10.1023/A:1011981927620. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
62. Zhang Y, Pardridge WM. Neuroprotection in transient focal brain ischemia after delayed intravenous administration of brain-derived neurotrophic factor conjugated to a blood-brain barrier drug targeting system. Stroke. 2001;32:1378–1384. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.32.6.1378. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
63. Zhang Y, Pardridge WM. Conjugation of brain-derived neurotrophic factor to a blood-brain barrier drug targeting system enables neuroprotection in regional brain ischemia following intravenous injection of the neurotrophin. Brain research. 2001;889:49–56. doi: 10.1016/S0006-8993(00)03108-5. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
64. Sapetto-Rebow B, et al. Maternal topoisomerase II alpha, not topoisomerase II beta, enables embryonic development of zebrafish top2a−/− mutants. BMC Dev Biol. 2011;11:71. doi: 10.1186/1471-213X-11-71. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
65. Corpet F. Multiple sequence alignment with hierarchical clustering. Nucleic acids research. 1988;16:10881–10890. doi: 10.1093/nar/16.22.10881. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
66. Deeti S, O’Farrell S, Kennedy BN. Early safety assessment of human oculotoxic drugs using the zebrafish visualmotor response. Journal of pharmacological and toxicological methods. 2014;69:1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.vascn.2013.09.002. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
67. Siegel, S. & Castellan, N. J. Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences. 2nd edn, (McGraw-Hill, 1988).
68. Alvarez Y, et al. Predominant cone photoreceptor dysfunction in a hyperglycaemic model of non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Dis Model Mech. 2010;3:236–245. doi: 10.1242/dmm.003772. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
69. Raymond PA, Barthel LK, Bernardos RL, Perkowski JJ. Molecular characterization of retinal stem cells and their niches in adult zebrafish. BMC Dev Biol. 2006;6:36. doi: 10.1186/1471-213X-6-36. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
70. Rappsilber J, Mann M, Ishihama Y. Protocol for micro-purification, enrichment, pre-fractionation and storage of peptides for proteomics using StageTips. Nature protocols. 2007;2:1896–1906. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2007.261. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
71. Cox J, Mann M. MaxQuant enables high peptide identification rates, individualized p.p.b.-range mass accuracies and proteome-wide protein quantification. Nature biotechnology. 2008;26:1367–1372. doi: 10.1038/nbt.1511. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
72. Cox J, et al. Andromeda: a peptide search engine integrated into the MaxQuant environment. Journal of proteome research. 2011;10:1794–1805. doi: 10.1021/pr101065j. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
73. Cox J, et al. Accurate proteome-wide label-free quantification by delayed normalization and maximal peptide ratio extraction, termed MaxLFQ. Molecular & cellular proteomics: MCP. 2014;13:2513–2526. doi: 10.1074/mcp.M113.031591. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
74. Tyanova S, et al. The Perseus computational platform for comprehensive analysis of (prote)omics data. Nature methods. 2016 [PubMed]
75. Deeb SJ, D’Souza RC, Cox J, Schmidt-Supprian M, Mann M. Super-SILAC allows classification of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma subtypes by their protein expression profiles. Molecular & cellular proteomics: MCP. 2012;11:77–89. doi: 10.1074/mcp.M111.015362. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group