PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptHHS Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
 
Leuk Lymphoma. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2017 September 12.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC5594739
NIHMSID: NIHMS888487

CD33 is frequently expressed in cases of myelodysplastic syndrome and chronic myelomonocytic leukemia with elevated blast count

CD33 is a transmembrane protein that belongs to the Siglecs (sialic-acid-binding immunoglobulin-like lectins) family[1]. In normal individuals, expression of CD33 is associated with myeloid maturation and is present on multipotent myeloid precursors and maturing monocytes and granulocytes, but is also found on some lymphoid cells [24]. The majority of cases of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) also express CD33 and there have been several attempts to develop monoclonal antibody-based therapies that target this molecule[5]. Gemtuzumab-ozogamicin, an antibody-drug conjugate (ADC), was approved initially by the FDA in 2000 after demonstrating activity as a single agent in patients with relapsed/refractory AML. It was later withdrawn after a phase III trial reported no survival benefit with increased rates of toxicity and early mortality [6,7]. However, a recent meta-analysis of 5 clinical trials combining gemtuzumab with chemotherapy for frontline treatment reported that use of gemtuzumab significantly decreased relapse and improved survival, particularly in patients with intermediate and favorable risk AML[8]. CD33-targeted therapy has not been as widely studied in myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) and chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML), although several smaller trials suggest gemtuzumab has some activity in these diseases [914]. The intensity of CD33-expression (as measured by the number of CD33 molecules per cell) on the CD34-positive blast-population has previously been reported to be lower in patients with MDS and CMML in comparison with AML [15].

We aimed to determine the expression of CD33 in patients with MDS and elevated blast count (≥5%). We searched a database of clinical trials conducted at our center for patients with high risk MDS and CMML to identify cases. We limited our search between January 2000 and September 2014 and included only untreated patients with flow-cytometry for quantification of CD33 expression performed on a bone marrow aspirate sample prior to starting treatment. We also identified AML patients treated over the same time period to serve as a comparator group for CD33 expression. At our center, the diagnosis of AML, MDS and CMML has been made according to WHO classification systems over this time period, and bone marrow samples with ≥20% blasts of the total nucleated cells are considered to have AML[1618]. The blast population from AML and MDS patients was analyzed using flow cytometry to quantify CD33 expression. Myeloblasts were identified based on dim CD45 expression and low side scatter. CD33 expression on the blast population was measured using an isotype-matched non-reactive antibody or autofluorescence to set a negative control threshold. Representative CD33-positive and CD33-negative cases of MDS are shown in Figure 1. We calculated the mean percentage of CD33-positive myeloblasts for AML, CMML and MDS and compared the results between groups using an unpaired student’s t-test.

Figure 1
Representative (a) CD33-positive case and (b) CD33-negative case of MDS. Scatter plots show expression of CD33 on myeloblasts, which were identified by gating on dim CD45/low side-scatter population.

We identified 2295 patients with AML, 25 patients with CMML and 174 patients with MDS in our database in the specified time period, where flow-cytometry measuring CD33 was performed prior to starting treatment. Mean bone marrow blast count by morphology for patients with MDS and CMML was 13.3% (SD 3.1%, Range 5–19%) and 14% (SD 2.5%, Range 10–18%) respectively. Most patients with MDS had refractory anemia with excess blasts (RAEB)-2 (n=159) and only a small number had RAEB-1 (n=15). All patients with CMML had ≥ 10% blasts plus promonocytes by morphology and were classified as CMML-2.

The mean percentage of CD33-positivity of the myeloblast population was 80.5% (95% CI 79.5–81.6%) in AML, 81.8% (95% CI 71.7–91.8%) in CMML and 75% (95% CI 71.5 – 78.7%) in MDS. Mean CD33 expression according to the French-American-British (FAB) classification system is shown in Table 1. This was significantly lower in MDS in comparison to AML (p=0.005) although not in comparison to CMML (p=0.2). Only 8 (4%) patients with CMML or MDS had a mean percentage of CD33-positive blasts less than 20%, which is shown in figure 2. In patients with MDS and CMML, CD33 was expressed across cytogenetic risk groups as defined by IPSS-R criteria (data not shown), although the number of patients in some categories was small making statistical comparison impractical. For MDS cases, mean CD34 expression was significantly higher in CD33-negative (<20%) cases (77% vs. 59%, p=0.002), although this comparison is based on a small number of CD33-negative cases (n=7). There was no significant difference in CD117 expression between CD33-negative and CD33-positive cases (71% vs. 66%, p=0.39). For AML cases, both mean CD34 (73.5% vs. 48.3%, p<0.001) and mean CD117 (75.0% vs. 63.8%, p<0.001) expression were significantly higher in CD33-negative cases.

Figure 2
Histogram showing percentage of blasts positive for CD33 in MDS and CMML cases
Table 1
Mean CD33 expression in AML, MDS and CMML according to FAB subtype

The main technical change in assessment of CD33-expression made at our center during the study period was a switch from 4-color panels on FACSCalibur instruments, to 7-color panels on FACSCantos instruments on July 11, 2011. In both cases we used the same monoclonal antibody, CD33 conjugated to phycoerythrin (PE). To assess possible technical differences in CD33 measurement we compared mean CD33 expression in AML patients before (n=1846) and after (n=449) this switch and there was no difference in expression (mean CD33 expression 80.7% vs. 79.9%, p=0.56) suggesting this change did not significantly impact measurement.

Our findings suggest that CD33 is expressed on myeloblasts in most cases of MDS and CMML, although this is significantly lower in MDS in comparison to AML. The optimal level of CD33-expression for treatment with an ADC has not been identified from clinical studies using gemtuzumab, although pre-clinical data suggest that the cell-surface density of CD33 correlates with cytotoxicity[19]. In a post-hoc analysis of clinical trials of gemtuzumab in elapsed AML, CD33 expression level was significantly higher in responders in comparison to non-responders [20]. However, in multivariate analysis CD33 expression was not significantly associated with response when controlling for p-glycoprotein expression, which was found to inversely correlate with CD33 expression. These trials only included patients with relatively high CD33 expression (>80% of myeloid blasts), and it is possible that a relationship between CD33 expression and response would be evident if patients with lower expression levels were also included. Despite this finding, we expect that some degree of CD33 expression is required for ADC activity, and our findings provide a rationale for investigating therapies targeting CD33 in MDS and CMML. Several novel CD33-targeted therapies are currently under development. SGN-CD33a is second generation ADC that links a DNA damaging agent (pyrrolobenzodiazepine) to an anti-CD33 monoclonal antibody. The interim results of a phase II clinical trial were recently reported and this agent appears to have activity in patients with relapsed/refractory AML, with an overall response rate of 42% (n=16/38) [21]. Bispecific T-cell engaging (BiTE) antibodies and chimeric antigen-receptor (CAR) T cells targeting CD33 have also demonstrated activity in AML pre-clinical studies [22,23]. Treatment options in high-risk MDS and CMML remain limited and hypomethylating agents and allogeneic stem-cell transplant are the primary treatment options outside of a clinical trial. Investigating CD33-targeted therapies in MDS and CMML patients with a high blast count is justified based on the relatively high frequency of expression of this target.

Acknowledgments

The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center is supported in part by the National Institutes of Health through a Cancer Center Support Grant (P30 CA16672).

Footnotes

Disclosures

The authors have no relevant conflicts of interest to disclose.

References

1. Cao H, Crocker PR. Evolution of CD33-related siglecs: regulating host immune functions and escaping pathogen exploitation? Immunology. 2011;132:18–26. [PubMed]
2. Nakamura Y, Noma M, Kidokoro M, et al. Expression of CD33 antigen on normal human activated T lymphocytes. Blood. 1994;83:1442–1443. [PubMed]
3. Hernandez-Caselles T, Martinez-Esparza M, Perez-Oliva AB, et al. A study of CD33 (SIGLEC-3) antigen expression and function on activated human T and NK cells: two isoforms of CD33 are generated by alternative splicing. J Leukoc Biol. 2006;79:46–58. [PubMed]
4. Tanimoto M, Scheinberg DA, Cordon-Cardo C, Huie D, Clarkson BD, Old LJ. Restricted expression of an early myeloid and monocytic cell surface antigen defined by monoclonal antibody M195. Leukemia. 1989;3:339–348. [PubMed]
5. Ehninger A, Kramer M, Rollig C, et al. Distribution and levels of cell surface expression of CD33 and CD123 in acute myeloid leukemia. Blood Cancer J. 2014;4:e218. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
6. Sievers EL, Larson RA, Stadtmauer EA, et al. Efficacy and safety of gemtuzumab ozogamicin in patients with CD33-positive acute myeloid leukemia in first relapse. J Clin Oncol. 2001;19:3244–3254. [PubMed]
7. Petersdorf SH, Kopecky KJ, Slovak M, et al. A phase 3 study of gemtuzumab ozogamicin during induction and postconsolidation therapy in younger patients with acute myeloid leukemia. Blood. 2013;121:4854–4860. [PubMed]
8. Hills RK, Castaigne S, Appelbaum FR, et al. Addition of gemtuzumab ozogamicin to induction chemotherapy in adult patients with acute myeloid leukaemia: a meta-analysis of individual patient data from randomised controlled trials. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15:986–996. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
9. Burnett AK, Russell NH, Hills RK, et al. Addition of gemtuzumab ozogamicin to induction chemotherapy improves survival in older patients with acute myeloid leukemia. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30:3924–3931. [PubMed]
10. de Lima M, Champlin RE, Thall PF, et al. Phase I/II study of gemtuzumab ozogamicin added to fludarabine, melphalan and allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for high-risk CD33 positive myeloid leukemias and myelodysplastic syndrome. Leukemia. 2008;22:258–264. [PubMed]
11. Sekeres MA, Maciejewski JP, Erba HP, et al. A Phase 2 study of combination therapy with arsenic trioxide and gemtuzumab ozogamicin in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes or secondary acute myeloid leukemia. Cancer. 2011;117:1253–1261. [PubMed]
12. Estey EH, Thall PF, Giles FJ, et al. Gemtuzumab ozogamicin with or without interleukin 11 in patients 65 years of age or older with untreated acute myeloid leukemia and high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome: comparison with idarubicin plus continuous-infusion, high-dose cytosine arabinoside. Blood. 2002;99:4343–4349. [PubMed]
13. Tsimberidou A, Estey E, Cortes J, et al. Gemtuzumab, fludarabine, cytarabine, and cyclosporine in patients with newly diagnosed acute myelogenous leukemia or high-risk myelodysplastic syndromes. Cancer. 2003;97:1481–1487. [PubMed]
14. Nand S, Godwin J, Smith S, et al. Hydroxyurea, azacitidine and gemtuzumab ozogamicin therapy in patients with previously untreated non-M3 acute myeloid leukemia and high-risk myelodysplastic syndromes in the elderly: results from a pilot trial. Leuk Lymphoma. 2008;49:2141–2147. [PubMed]
15. Jilani I, Estey E, Huh Y, et al. Differences in CD33 intensity between various myeloid neoplasms. Am J Clin Pathol. 2002;118:560–566. [PubMed]
16. Jaffe ES, Harris NL, Stein H, Vardiman JW, editors. Pathology and Genetics of Tumours of Haematopoietic and Lymphoid Tissues. Lyon, France: IARC; 2001. World Health Organization Classification of Tumours.
17. Harris NL, Jaffe ES, Diebold J, et al. The World Health Organization classification of neoplastic diseases of the haematopoietic and lymphoid tissues: Report of the Clinical Advisory Committee Meeting, Airlie House, Virginia, November 1997. Histopathology. 2000;36:69–86. [PubMed]
18. Swerdlow SH, Campo CE, Harris NL, et al., editors. WHO Classification of Tumours of Haematopoietic and Lymphoid Tissues. Lyon, France: IARC; 2008.
19. Walter RB, Raden BW, Kamikura DM, Cooper JA, Bernstein ID. Influence of CD33 expression levels and ITIM-dependent internalization on gemtuzumab ozogamicin-induced cytotoxicity. Blood. 2005;105:1295–1302. [PubMed]
20. Walter RB, Gooley TA, van der Velden VH, et al. CD33 expression and P-glycoprotein-mediated drug efflux inversely correlate and predict clinical outcome in patients with acute myeloid leukemia treated with gemtuzumab ozogamicin monotherapy. Blood. 2007;109(10):4168–70. [PubMed]
21. Stein EM, Stein A, Walter RB, et al. Interim Analysis of a Phase 1 Trial of SGN-CD33A in Patients with CD33-Positive Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML). ASH Annual meeting; 2014; abstract 623.
22. Friedrich M, Henn A, Raum T, et al. Preclinical characterization of AMG 330, a CD3/CD33-bispecific T-cell-engaging antibody with potential for treatment of acute myelogenous leukemia. Mol Cancer Ther. 2014;13:1549–1557. [PubMed]
23. Kenderian SS, Ruella M, Shestova O, et al. CD33 Specific Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cells Exhibit Potent Preclinical Activity against Human Acute Myeloid Leukemia. Leukemia. 2015 May 28; epub ahead of print. [PMC free article] [PubMed]