PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of aidsrestherBioMed CentralBiomed Central Web Sitesearchsubmit a manuscriptregisterthis articleAIDS Research and Therapy
 
AIDS Res Ther. 2017; 14: 51.
Published online 2017 September 12. doi:  10.1186/s12981-017-0174-7
PMCID: PMC5594498

A novel HIV vaccine targeting the protease cleavage sites

Abstract

HIV preferentially infects activated CD4+ T cells and mutates rapidly. The classical vaccine approach aimed to generate broad immune responses to full HIV proteins largely failed to address the potential adverse impact of increased number of activated CD4+ T cells as viral targets. Learning from natural immunity observed in a group of HIV resistant Kenyan female sex workers, we are testing a novel vaccine approach. It focuses immune response to the highly conserved sequences surrounding the HIV protease cleavage sites (PCS) to disrupt viral maturation, while limiting excessive immune activation. Our pilot studies using nonhuman primate SIV infection models suggest that this approach is feasible and promising.

Keywords: HIV, Vaccine, Protease cleavage sites, Natural immunity, Pumwani sex worker cohort, Nonhuman primate, SIV

Background

Worldwide, it is estimated that almost 37 million people are living with human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1). In 2015 alone, around 2.1 million individuals became newly infected with HIV and 1.1 million people died from AIDS, highlighting the urgent need for an effective HIV vaccine. Six HIV vaccine candidates to date have been tested in Phase IIb clinical trials. The first two trials Vax004 and Vax003 sought to induce protection by eliciting antibody responses to gp120, but failed to protect against HIV acquisition [1, 2]. The three other phase IIb trials, HVTN502, 503 and 505, attempted to induce T cell-based immunity against HIV. All three failed to elicit immune responses capable of providing protection against HIV acquisition [35]. The only HIV vaccine that has been modestly successful was from the RV144 trial, in which a recombinant canary pox-based vaccine (ALVAC) combined with a recombinant gp120 (AIDSVAX) vaccine was tested. The vaccine protected 31% of vaccinees against HIV acquisition after a modified intention-to-treat analysis [6].

HIV primarily infects CD4+ T cells, a critical component of the human immune system. As a retrovirus HIV mutates rapidly, giving rise to extensive genetic diversity. These inherent characteristics underscore the challenges for developing a prophylactic vaccine. Novel approaches and ideas need to be tested to develop an effective vaccine to HIV-1.

Natural immunity to HIV: a new clue to vaccine development

Edward Jenner developed the successful smallpox vaccine based on the natural immunity observed in milkmaids. Thus, the correlates of natural immunity to HIV-1 documented in highly exposed uninfected individuals may provide a vital clue for the development of a preventative vaccine for HIV-1. Several cohort studies have documented that there is considerable heterogeneity in susceptibility to HIV-1 infection [79]. Some individuals remain uninfected despite continued high risk exposure to HIV-1 [10]. Understanding why these individuals escape HIV-1 infection and the immunologic correlates that confer protective immunity in these individuals could aid in the development of an effective vaccine.

The spectra of HIV Gag epitopes recognized by HLA alleles are associated with different outcomes of HIV-1 acquisition

Studies showed that the observed natural resistance to HIV-1 infection in the Pumwani sex worker cohort was associated with several alleles of human leukocyte antigens (HLAs) and specific CD8+ and CD4+ T cell responses to HIV-1 [1114]. Therefore, we analyzed Gag epitopes of two major HIV-1 subtypes circulating in Kenya of two HLA class I alleles associated independently with different outcomes of HIV-1 infection. Our study showed that the protective allele, A*01:01, only recognized three Gag epitopes. In contrast, B*07:02, the allele associated with susceptibility, bound 30 epitope variants [15]. These two alleles differed most importantly in the spectrum of Gag epitopes they could present, and not in binding affinity, off-rates, the location of the epitopes, or epitope-specific Tem/Tcm frequencies [15]. Contrary to the classical HIV-1 vaccine design to generate broad and strong immune responses to several HIV-1 proteins [16, 17], the allele, which recognizes more epitopes and generates stronger IFN-γ ELISPOT responses, was associated with an increased susceptibility to HIV-1 acquisition.

Lessons from natural immunity to HIV-1: more might not be better

Two things can be learned from our studies: (a) broad immune responses do not necessarily provide protection and may in fact promote infection; (b) narrowly targeted T cell response can be associated with protection against infection and may be an alternative strategy for an anti-HIV vaccine. Infection of CD4+ T cells is the key difference between HIV-1 and other infectious pathogens and activated CD4+ T cells are the primary targets for HIV-1, thus a narrow spectrum of epitope presentation by a protective allele appears to make sense. Theoretically, recognizing more epitopes will activate more CD8+ T cells to destroy the virally infected cells. However, it could also activate more bystander CD4+ T cells via cytokines produced by epitope-recognizing CD8+ T cells. The increased CD4+ T cell activation and recruitment to mucosal sites could increase the risk of HIV acquisition. This may explain why the B*07:02 allele, capable of recognizing a broader spectrum of Gag epitopes, was associated with rapid seroconversion. Ideally, an effective preventative vaccine to HIV-1 should be able to destroy the infecting virus or infected cells without causing excessive immune activation. The narrow and focused Gag epitope presentation by A*01:01 might provide such balance enabling the destruction of initially infected cells with minimum immune activation. Furthermore, recent studies have shown that in most cases mucosal acquisition of HIV-1 typically resulted from a single or a few founder viruses [18, 19]. Immune mechanisms preventing the establishment of a few founder viruses are likely different from the ones dealing with a full-blown viral infection after the virus has been well established in the host. It is possible that a lower magnitude, narrowly focused, well maintained virus-specific CD8+ T cell response to multiple subtypes is sufficient to destroy and eliminate a few founder viruses without inducing inflammatory responses that may activate more CD4+ T cells and provide more targets for HIV.

Sequences around the HIV protease cleavage sites are viable vaccine targets

The only Gag peptide recognized by A*01:01 with relative high affinity and normal off-rate is a 9-mer peptide that covers the protease cleavage site at p17/p24 (Fig. 1a) [15]. This region is relatively conserved among major HIV subtypes (A1, B, D, and G). We tested 8 peptide variants of the HIV-1 subtype consensus sequences and found that A*01:01 can bind to all of them with similar affinity and off-rates [15]. Thus, despite A*01:01 being able to only present a narrow spectrum of Gag epitopes, it can tolerate variations of the specific epitope. Why is this region important for HIV-1? The protease of HIV-1 is a small 99-amino acid aspartic enzyme that mediates the cleavage of Gag, Gag-Pol and Nef precursor polyproteins (Fig. 1a). The process is highly specific, temporally regulated and essential for the production of infectious viral particles (Fig. 1b). Because a total of 12 proteolytic reactions are required to generate a viable virion, a vaccine generating immune responses to the sequences around the 12 protease cleavage sites of HIV-1 might be able to destroy virus-infected cells, drive viral mutations to generate non-infectious virus and take the advantage of the rapid mutations of HIV-1 (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
a Translation of HIV Gag and Pol genes produces two large polyproteins, Pr55Gag and Pr160Gag-Pol, which are cleaved at 12 protease cleavage sites (PCS) to produce 13 proteins in a mature HIV virion. Cleavage of Pr55Gag polyprotein by HIV protease at ...

Because of its essential role in the production of infectious virions, HIV protease has been a major therapeutic target. Protease inhibitors have been successfully used to treat HIV-1 infection and are essential component of successful HAART therapies. Most of the protease inhibitors were designed to compete with its natural substrates based on the structure of the active binding site [20]. Recently, drugs that target Gag to inhibit protease-mediated processing at specific Gag cleavage sites have also been developed [21]. Studies have shown that the process of protease cleavage requires a tightly controlled, ordered sequence of proteolytic processing events mediated by different rates of cleavage at the different processing sites [22]. Even the subtle disturbances may be sufficient to interrupt this delicately balanced process and drive it toward a non-productive end [22]. Therefore, a vaccine targeting the 12 protease cleavage sites (PCS) could be effective. Furthermore, since the PCS are highly conserved among major subtypes of HIV-1, direct immune responses against these cleavage sites would yield several major advantages [23]. First, the host immune response could destroy the virus before it can establish itself permanently in the host. Second, the vaccine could force the virus to mutate, thus eliminating viable virions by abolishing the normal function of the HIV protease. Third, restricting the immune responses to these sites can avoid distracting immune responses that often generate unwanted inflammatory responses and excessive immune activation leading to more targets for HIV-1 infection, establishment and spread. A vaccine focusing on the sequences around the 12 PCS of HIV-1 is like a surgical attack of the function of HIV protease with 12 bullets, in the meantime minimizing the level of mucosal T cell activation, which has been proposed as a critical factor in developing an effective mucosal AIDS vaccine [24]. Since all 12 protease cleavage reactions have to be carried out successfully to generate an infectious virus, vaccines generating immune responses against the 12 substrates of HIV-1 protease could make it more difficult for the virus to escape in the meantime avoiding unfavorable effect.

Evaluation of a PCS-targeting vaccine in nonhuman primates

Nonhuman primates (NHP) are the best animal models to evaluate candidate vaccines for human pathogens. PCS peptides delivered by recombinant vesicular stomatitis virus and nanoparticles (PCS vaccine) were tested in a pilot study as a preventative vaccine candidate using a cynomolgus macaque SIV infection model. Based on promising results from this pilot study, the vaccine is currently being validated and further characterized in a larger-scale study, in comparison with vaccines against full Gag and Env proteins.

Conclusion

Based on the correlates of natural immunity to HIV resistance and our preliminary data from nonhuman primate study, the new vaccine strategy targeting the viral protease cleavage sites is feasible and promising. It needs to be further studied and refined towards the development of an effective HIV vaccine.

Authors’ contributions

HL and RWO conducted research and wrote the review, FAP and ML conceived and designed research, acquired funding, supervised and advised research, and revised the review. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Dr. Matthew Gilmour, National Microbiology Laboratory, for acquiring funding, supervising research and providing critical advice and input that significantly contributed to the manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The animal work cited in this review was performed in accordance with Canadian Council on Animal Care guidelines and the Animal Use Document was approved by the Canadian Sciences Centre for Human and Animal Health Animal Care Committee (Protocol Number: H-12-014R2).

Funding

This work was supported by a CIHR/CHVI Catalyst grant, a CIHR Operating Grant—PA: Bridge Funding—CHVI Vaccine Discovery and Social Research, a NIH Grant (R01AI111805) and funding from National Microbiology Laboratory of Canada. The funding agencies have no role in the design of the study and collection, analysis, and interpretation of data and in writing the manuscript.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Footnotes

Hongzhao Li and Robert W. Omange contributed equally to this work

Contributor Information

Hongzhao Li, moc.liamg@ac.iloahzgnoh.

Robert W. Omange, moc.oohay@wegnamor.

Francis A. Plummer, ac.abotinamu@remmulP.sicnarF.

Ma Luo, ac.cg.cpsa-cahp@oul.am.

References

1. Flynn NM, Forthal DN, Harro CD, Judson FN, Mayer KH, Para MF, HIVVSG rgp Placebo-controlled phase 3 trial of a recombinant glycoprotein 120 vaccine to prevent HIV-1 infection. J Infect Dis. 2005;191:654–665. doi: 10.1086/428404. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
2. Pitisuttithum P, Gilbert P, Gurwith M, Heyward W, Martin M, van Griensven F, Hu D, Tappero JW, Choopanya K, G Bangkok Vaccine Evaluation Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled efficacy trial of a bivalent recombinant glycoprotein 120 HIV-1 vaccine among injection drug users in Bangkok, Thailand. J Infect Dis. 2006;194:1661–1671. doi: 10.1086/508748. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
3. Gray GE, Allen M, Moodie Z, Churchyard G, Bekker LG, Nchabeleng M, Mlisana K, Metch B, de Bruyn G, Latka MH, et al. Safety and efficacy of the HVTN 503/Phambili study of a clade-B-based HIV-1 vaccine in South Africa: a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled test-of-concept phase 2b study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2011;11:507–515. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(11)70098-6. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
4. Latka MH, Fielding K, Gray GE, Bekker LG, Nchabeleng M, Mlisana K, Nielson T, Roux S, Mkhize B, Mathebula M, et al. Pregnancy incidence and correlates during the HVTN 503 Phambili HIV vaccine trial conducted among South African women. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e31387. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0031387. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
5. Peiperl L, Morgan C, Moodie Z, Li H, Russell N, Graham BS, Tomaras GD, De Rosa SC, McElrath MJ, Network NHVT. Safety and immunogenicity of a replication-defective adenovirus type 5 HIV vaccine in Ad5-seronegative persons: a randomized clinical trial (HVTN 054) PLoS ONE. 2010;5:e13579. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0013579. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
6. Rerks-Ngarm S, Pitisuttithum P, Nitayaphan S, Kaewkungwal J, Chiu J, Paris R, Premsri N, Namwat C, de Souza M, Adams E, et al. Vaccination with ALVAC and AIDSVAX to prevent HIV-1 infection in Thailand. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:2209–2220. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0908492. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
7. Cohen J. AIDS vaccine research. HIV natural resistance field finally overcomes resistance. Science. 2009;326:1476–1477. doi: 10.1126/science.326.5959.1476. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
8. Fowke KR, Nagelkerke NJ, Kimani J, Simonsen JN, Anzala AO, Bwayo JJ, MacDonald KS, Ngugi EN, Plummer FA. Resistance to HIV-1 infection among persistently seronegative prostitutes in Nairobi, Kenya. Lancet. 1996;348:1347–1351. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(95)12269-2. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
9. Young JM, Turpin JA, Musib R, Sharma OK. Outcomes of a National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Workshop on understanding HIV-exposed but seronegative individuals. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 2011;27:737–743. doi: 10.1089/aid.2010.0313. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
10. Beretta A, Furci L, Burastero S, Cosma A, Dinelli ME, Lopalco L, DeSantis C, Tambussi G, Carrow E, Sabbatani S, et al. HIV-1-specific immunity in persistently seronegative individuals at high risk for HIV infection. Immunol Lett. 1996;51:39–43. doi: 10.1016/0165-2478(96)02553-9. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
11. Alimonti JB, Kimani J, Matu L, Wachihi C, Kaul R, Plummer FA, Fowke KR. Characterization of CD8 T-cell responses in HIV-1-exposed seronegative commercial sex workers from Nairobi, Kenya. Immunol Cell Biol. 2006;84:482–485. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1711.2006.01455.x. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
12. Alimonti JB, Koesters SA, Kimani J, Matu L, Wachihi C, Plummer FA, Fowke KR. CD4+ T cell responses in HIV-exposed seronegative women are qualitatively distinct from those in HIV-infected women. J Infect Dis. 2005;191:20–24. doi: 10.1086/425998. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
13. Hardie RA, Knight E, Bruneau B, Semeniuk C, Gill K, Nagelkerke N, Kimani J, Wachihi C, Ngugi E, Luo M, et al. A common human leucocyte antigen-DP genotype is associated with resistance to HIV-1 infection in Kenyan sex workers. AIDS. 2008;22:2038–2042. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0b013e328311d1a0. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
14. Lacap PA, Huntington JD, Luo M, Nagelkerke NJ, Bielawny T, Kimani J, Wachihi C, Ngugi EN, Plummer FA. Associations of human leukocyte antigen DRB with resistance or susceptibility to HIV-1 infection in the Pumwani Sex Worker Cohort. AIDS. 2008;22:1029–1038. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0b013e3282ffb3db. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
15. Luo M, Daniuk CA, Diallo TO, Capina RE, Kimani J, Wachihi C, Kimani M, Bielawny T, Peterson T, Mendoza MG, et al. For protection from HIV-1 infection, more might not be better: a systematic analysis of HIV Gag epitopes of two alleles associated with different outcomes of HIV-1 infection. J Virol. 2012;86:1166–1180. doi: 10.1128/JVI.05721-11. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
16. HIV vaccine failure prompts Merck to halt trial. Nature. 2007;449(7161):390. [PubMed]
17. VaxGen vaccine trial fails the test but may offer insights. AIDS Alert. 2003;18(4):41, 43–5. [PubMed]
18. Keele BF, Giorgi EE, Salazar-Gonzalez JF, Decker JM, Pham KT, Salazar MG, Sun C, Grayson T, Wang S, Li H, et al. Identification and characterization of transmitted and early founder virus envelopes in primary HIV-1 infection. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008;105:7552–7557. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0802203105. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
19. Fischer W, Ganusov VV, Giorgi EE, Hraber PT, Keele BF, Leitner T, Han CS, Gleasner CD, Green L, Lo CC, et al. Transmission of single HIV-1 genomes and dynamics of early immune escape revealed by ultra-deep sequencing. PLoS ONE. 2010;5:e12303. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0012303. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
20. Wlodawer A, Vondrasek J. Inhibitors of HIV-1 protease: a major success of structure-assisted drug design. Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct. 1998;27:249–284. doi: 10.1146/annurev.biophys.27.1.249. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
21. Adamson CS, Salzwedel K, Freed EO. Virus maturation as a new HIV-1 therapeutic target. Expert Opin Ther Targets. 2009;13:895–908. doi: 10.1517/14728220903039714. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
22. Muller B, Anders M, Akiyama H, Welsch S, Glass B, Nikovics K, Clavel F, Tervo HM, Keppler OT, Krausslich HG. HIV-1 Gag processing intermediates trans-dominantly interfere with HIV-1 infectivity. J Biol Chem. 2009;284:29692–29703. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109.027144. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
23. Luo M, Capina R, Daniuk C, Tuff J, Peters H, Kimani M, Wachihi C, Kimani J, Ball TB, Plummer FA. Immunogenicity of sequences around HIV-1 protease cleavage sites: potential targets and population coverage analysis for a HIV vaccine targeting protease cleavage sites. Vaccine. 2013;31:3000–3008. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2013.04.057. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
24. Genesca M, Miller CJ. Use of nonhuman primate models to develop mucosal AIDS vaccines. Curr HIV AIDS Rep. 2010;7:19–27. doi: 10.1007/s11904-009-0035-7. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
25. Ikuta K, Suzuki S, Horikoshi H, Mukai T, Luftig RB. Positive and negative aspects of the human immunodeficiency virus protease: development of inhibitors versus its role in AIDS pathogenesis. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2000;64:725–745. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.64.4.725-745.2000. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
26. Jacks T, Power MD, Masiarz FR, Luciw PA, Barr PJ, Varmus HE. Characterization of ribosomal frameshifting in HIV-1 gag-pol expression. Nature. 1988;331:280–283. doi: 10.1038/331280a0. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
27. de Oliveira T, Engelbrecht S, Janse E, van Rensburg M, Gordon K Bishop, zur Megede J, Barnett SW, S Cassol. Variability at human immunodeficiency virus type 1 subtype C protease cleavage sites: an indication of viral fitness? J Virol. 2003;77:9422–9430. doi: 10.1128/JVI.77.17.9422-9430.2003. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
28. Freed EO. HIV-1 assembly, release and maturation. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2015;13:484–496. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro3490. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]

Articles from AIDS Research and Therapy are provided here courtesy of BioMed Central