PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of frontphysiolLink to Publisher's site
 
Front Physiol. 2017; 8: 667.
Published online 2017 September 6. doi:  10.3389/fphys.2017.00667
PMCID: PMC5592640

Bacillus: A Biological Tool for Crop Improvement through Bio-Molecular Changes in Adverse Environments

Abstract

Crop productivity is affected by environmental and genetic factors. Microbes that are beneficial to plants are used to enhance the crop yield and are alternatives to chemical fertilizers and pesticides. Pseudomonas and Bacillus species are the predominant plant growth-promoting bacteria. The spore-forming ability of Bacillus is distinguished from that of Pseudomonas. Members of this genus also survive for a long time under unfavorable environmental conditions. Bacillus spp. secrete several metabolites that trigger plant growth and prevent pathogen infection. Limited studies have been conducted to understand the physiological changes that occur in crops in response to Bacillus spp. to provide protection against adverse environmental conditions. This review describes the current understanding of Bacillus-induced physiological changes in plants as an adaptation to abiotic and biotic stresses. During water scarcity, salinity and heavy metal accumulate in soil, Bacillus spp. produce exopolysaccharides and siderophores, which prevent the movement of toxic ions and adjust the ionic balance and water transport in plant tissues while controlling the pathogenic microbial population. In addition, the synthesis of indole-3-acetic acid, gibberellic acid and1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate (ACC) deaminase by Bacillus regulates the intracellular phytohormone metabolism and increases plant stress tolerance. Cell-wall-degrading substances, such as chitosanase, protease, cellulase, glucanase, lipopeptides and hydrogen cyanide from Bacillus spp. damage the pathogenic bacteria, fungi, nematodes, viruses and pests to control their populations in plants and agricultural lands. The normal plant metabolism is affected by unfavorable environmental stimuli, which suppress crop growth and yield. Abiotic and biotic stress factors that have detrimental effects on crops are mitigated by Bacillus-induced physiological changes, including the regulation of water transport, nutrient up-take and the activation of the antioxidant and defense systems. Bacillus association stimulates plant immunity against stresses by altering stress-responsive genes, proteins, phytohormones and related metabolites. This review describes the beneficial effect of Bacillus spp. on crop plants, which improves plant productivity under unfavorable climatic conditions, and the current understanding of the mitigation mechanism of Bacillus spp. in stress-tolerant and/or stress-resistant plants.

Keywords: Bacillus, crop plants, diseases, heavy metals, drought, salinity

Introduction

The growth and yield of crop plants depend on genetic and variable environmental factors (Kleinwechter et al., 2016; Li et al., 2016). Plant breeding and genetic transformation approaches are used to transfer desired genes from crop varieties via sexual hybridization and artificial insertion, respectively, to develop new cultivars with the desired traits, such as high yield and adaptation to unfavorable environmental conditions (Jain, 1998). There is less commercial success for genetically modified agricultural crops. Numerous microbes are naturally beneficial to plants and help to sustain plant growth and yield during abiotic and biotic stresses. Plant cell chloroplasts and mitochondria evolved from symbiotic bacteria (Martin et al., 2001), and these key organelles absorb and convert energy for plant growth and survival. Plant-beneficial bacteria and fungi, living in the soil as free organisms or as endophytes, that trigger plant growth and protect plants from diseases and abiotic factors have been well documented by several researchers (Tonelli et al., 2010; Radhakrishnan et al., 2014). Some of the bacteria belonging to the Acetobacter, Azospirillum, Azotobacter, Bacillus, Burkholderia, Klebsiella, Pseudomonas, and Serratia genera have been recorded as plant growth-promoting bacteria (PGPB) (Glick, 1995; Jones et al., 2007). Among several species of PGPB, the Pseudomonas and Bacillus spp. have been identified as the predominant communities (Kang et al., 2015a), and a few of the PGPB have been commercialized due to their survival within a diverse range of biotic and abiotic environments. The first commercial bacterial fertilizer, Alinit, was developed from Bacillus spp. and resulted in a 40% increase in crop yield (Kilian et al., 2000). Other Bacillus spp.-based products, such as Kodiak (Bacillus subtilis GB03), Quantum-400 (B. subtilis GB03), Rhizovital (Bacillus amyloliquefaciens FZB42), Serenade (B. subtilis QST713), and YIB (Bacillus spp.), have been commercialized for improving crop production (Brannen and Kenney, 1997; Ngugi et al., 2005; Cawoy et al., 2011). Indeed, Bacillus-based bio-fertilizers are more active compared to Pseudomonas-based fertilizers due to the more effective metabolite production and spore-forming character of Bacillus spp., which enhances the viability of cells in commercially formulated products (Haas and Defago, 2005).

Bacillus spp. are gram positive, ubiquitous in nature and recovered from all niches in the environment. These species have also been used to prepare medicinal, industrial and agricultural products (Lyngwi and Joshi, 2014). Bio-fertilizers can be used as alternatives to chemical fertilizers and pesticides and can provide new insights into enhancing plant growth and yield in the face of diseases (Choudhary, 2011). The plant-beneficial Bacillus spp. associate with roots or rhizospheres and develop biofilms to increase plant growth (Beauregard et al., 2013). The application of Bacillus-based fertilizers to soil can enhance the plant-available forms of nutrients in rhizospheres, control disease-causing pathogenic microbial growth and induce pest defense systems (Garcia-Fraile et al., 2015; Kang et al., 2015b). This review is focused on the growth-promoting potential of Bacillus spp. in crop plants and the involvement of these bacteria in reprogramming plant physiological changes to achieve abiotic and biotic stress tolerance.

Bacillus spp. metabolites promote plant growth

Seed germination and plant growth are significantly influenced by the nutrients available in the soil. Plants absorb phosphorus (P) and nitrogen (N) from the soil through root transporters, but the bioavailable forms of P and N are limited in rhizospheres (De-Willigen, 1986; Robinson, 2001; Bidondo et al., 2012). The beneficial effect of Bacillus spp. to crop improvement is given in Table Table1.1. Bacillus spp. convert the complex form of essential nutrients, such as P and N, to a simple available form that is used during uptake by plant roots (Kang et al., 2015a; Kuan et al., 2016). Phosphate is involved in nucleic acid, phospholipid, and adenosine triphosphate (ATP) metabolism, among other metabolic pathways, in plant cells (Theodorou and Plaxton, 1993). The secretion of phosphatases and organic acids from Bacillus spp. acidifies the surrounding environment to facilitate the conversion of inorganic phosphate into free phosphate (Kang et al., 2014a, 2015a). Additionally, N is an important component of proteins, nucleic acids and other organic compounds in plants, and the available form of N in soil is limited, which slows plant growth in natural habitats (Barker et al., 1974; De-Willigen, 1986). Some of the Bacillus spp. release ammonia from nitrogenous organic matter (Hayat et al., 2010). Ding et al. (2005) reported that some of the Bacillus spp. have the nifH gene and produce nitrogenase (EC 1.18.6.1), which can fix atmospheric N2 and provide it to plants to enhance plant growth and yield by delaying senescence (Kuan et al., 2016).

Table 1
Bio-fertilizer effect of Bacillus spp. on crop plants.

The iron-chelating properties of Bacillus spp. via siderophore production help to solubilize iron from minerals and organic compounds in rhizospheres (Nadeem et al., 2012). Siderophores bind Fe3+ in complex substances and reduce the Fe3+ to Fe2+, which then enters plants (Walker and Connolly, 2008).

The presence of tryptophan and other bacterial food source compounds induces the synthesis of indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) and other hormones in bacterial populations (Glick, 2014). Plant-growth-promoting substances, such as IAA, gibberellins, cytokinins and spermidines, are synthesized by Bacillus spp. and increase root and shoot cell division and elongation (Arkhipova et al., 2005; Xie et al., 2014; Radhakrishnan and Lee, 2016). The secretion of ACC deaminase (EC 4.1.99.4) by Bacillus spp. inhibits ethylene synthesis in crop plants and promotes plant growth (Xu M. et al., 2014; Pourbabaee et al., 2016). ACC deaminase breaks down ACC into ammonia and ketobutyrate in plant cells, and the cross-talk between ACC deaminase and IAA facilitates the reduction of ethylene, thereby enhancing plant growth (Honma and Shimomura, 1978; Glick, 2014). The N fixation, P solubilization, plant growth promoting hormones and enzymes section of Bacillus spp. confirm their bio-fertilizer effects on plants to improve the growth and yield of crops.

Bacillus-mediated plant growth promotion under abiotic stress conditions

Plant drought tolerance by Bacillus spp. inoculation

Soil moisture severely influences crop productivity in arid and semiarid areas. Low moisture content in the soil due to low annual precipitation creates drought stress in plants. Regulating the uptake and distribution of nutrients, transport of water, and accumulation of compatible solutes and antioxidants in plant tissues can help to improve plant productivity under drought conditions (Boomsma and Vyn, 2008). Applying drought-tolerant Bacillus spp. to the soil increases the populations of these bacteria on the roots and stimulates root exudation to promote both bacterial and plant growth (Sandhya et al., 2011). Plants colonized by Bacillus spp. take up more water, which is an important mechanism for plant protection against drought-induced damage (Marulanda et al., 2009). The mitigating effects of Bacillus-induced physiological changes in plants are shown in Figure Figure11 and Table Table22.

Figure 1
Direct effect of Bacillus-secretions on plant protection from adverse environments.
Table 2
Bacillus-induced physiological and biochemical changes in crop plants during drought, salinity and heavy metal accumulation in soil and pest, pathogenic bacterial and fungal infection.

The uptake of N, P, and potassium (K+) decreases in drought-injured plants, whereas treatments with Bacillus spp. increase these macro nutrients in stressed plants (Barnawal et al., 2013). Bacterial enzymes increase the accumulation of the bioavailable forms of these macro nutrients in the soil and plants (Kang et al., 2015a; Kuan et al., 2016). In addition, these bacteria regulate high-affinity potassium transporter 1 (HKT1), which modulates Na+/K+ homeostasis, to mitigate drought stress (Gassmann et al., 1996; Vieira-Pires et al., 2013). Furthermore, K+ plays a key role in stomatal opening, turgor pressure maintenance, osmotic balance and controlling the transpiration rate in plants under drought stress (Loutfy et al., 2012). The scavenging activity of K+ helps to inhibit reactive oxygen species (ROS) formation during photosynthesis and NADPH oxidase metabolism (Cakmak, 2005). The concentrations of plant nutrients, such as Ca++, Mg++, Zn++, Mn++, and Cu++, are increased by Bacillus megaterium, Bacillus thuringiensis and Bacillus spp. applications in drought-stressed lavandula (Lavandula angustifolia L.) and salvia (Salvia divinorum L.) plants (Armada et al., 2014). Ca++ is involved in stabilizing membrane systems, and the accumulation of Mg++ regulates the homeostasis of ions in the chloroplasts, vacuoles and stomata of plant tissues (Shaul-Keinan et al., 2002; Huda et al., 2013). Some Bacillus spp., enhance plant growth during drought stress by increasing Fe levels. The high level of Fe++ in plants is probably due to siderophores derived from Bacillus spp. (Zawadzka et al., 2009). Aquaporins, particularly those encoded by the plasma membrane intrinsic protein (PIP) subfamily of aquaporin genes (Maurel et al., 2008), offer a low-resistance pathway for the movement of water across membranes to compensate for drought effects. Bacillus spp. regulate all the PIP genes to increase the hydraulic conductivity of roots in drought stressed plants, and aquaporins also transport urea, CO2 and H2O2 for N metabolism, carbon fixation and stress signaling, respectively (Armada et al., 2015).

The limited uptake of water and nutrients disturbs the normal cellular physiological processes and generates ROS, which damage proteins, lipids and nucleic acids in drought-exposed plants (Zgallai et al., 2005; Miller et al., 2010). ROS accumulation affects lipid membranes and causes lipid peroxidation and enhanced electrolyte leakage. Recovery from oxidative stress-induced damage is possible via antioxidant synthesis, which inhibits ROS formation. Bacillus-based bacterial association in plants can reduce the synthesis of ROS in cells via various scavenging enzymes (Kakar et al., 2016). Bacillus spp. either increase or decrease antioxidant enzyme activities in plants to mitigate drought stress. For example, B. safensis increases catalase (CAT; EC 1.11.1.6), superoxide dismutase (SOD; EC 1.15.1.1), peroxidase (POD; EC 1.11.1.7), ascorbate peroxidase (APX; EC 1.11.1.11) and glutathione reductase (GR; EC 1.6.4.2) activities (Chakraborty et al., 2013), while B. amyloliquefaciens decreases APX, GR and dehydroascorbate reductase (DHAR; 1.8.5.1) activities in plants under drought stress (Kasim et al., 2013).

The drought-induced oversynthesis of proline is suppressed in bacteria-treated plants, reflecting bacterial-derived resistance to the detrimental effects induced by drought (Barnawal et al., 2013). The normal metabolism of carbohydrates and amino acids is disturbed in plants during drought stress, and this effect is possibly reversed by interactions with Bacillus spp. Sucrose and fructose concentrations are enhanced in plants to contribute to drought adaptation by increasing root growth (Gagne-Bourque et al., 2016). As a consequence of stress, some of the endogenous amino acid accumulation triggers the production of secondary metabolites in stress-affected plants to mitigate oxidative stress (Jia et al., 2001). The synthesis of aromatic, glutamic and aspartic amino acid families is greater in plants associated with Bacillus spp. Histidine, tyrosine, phenylalanine, valine, leucine, isoleucine, asparagine, serine and γ-aminobutyric acid levels are increased due to the effects of drought in soil (Gagne-Bourque et al., 2016).

Drought inhibits pigment synthesis and reduces photosynthesis, while Bacillus spp. stimulate the synthesis of chlorophylls a and b and carotenoid in stressed plants, which increases photosynthesis (Barnawal et al., 2013; Hashem et al., 2015). The modulation of plant hormonal signals reprograms plant growth during drought stress. The hormone- and ACC deaminase-producing Bacillus spp. regulate plant growth by enhancing levels of stress-related hormones, such as salicylic acid (SA), jasmonic acid (JA) and abscisic acid (ABA), and reducing ACC, which is responsible for generating ethylene (Barnawal et al., 2013; Castillo et al., 2013). ABA accumulation improves drought tolerance by activating antioxidant enzymes and prevents water loss by stomatal closure (Lu et al., 2009; Zhu et al., 2011). Similarly, SA induces the expression of stress-related genes to maintain membrane stability and prevent the accumulation of ROS (El-Tayeb, 2005; Jumali et al., 2011).

The normal gene expression pattern in plants is altered during drought. The expression of OsDIL (drought-induced lipid transfer protein), OsDREB1A (dehydration-responsive element-binding protein 1A), OsGAPDH (glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase), OsWRKY11 (WRKY transcription factor 11), P4H (prolyl-4-hydroxylase), Cadhn (dehydrin-like protein), VA (vacuolar H+-ATPase), sHSP (small heat shock protein), CaPR-10 (pathogenesis-related protein 10), cAPX (cytosolic ascorbate peroxidase), rbcL (ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxy/oxygenase large subunit) and rbcS (ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxy/oxygenase small subunit) genes are affected during drought stress in crop plants. The lipid transfer is essential for development of lipidic orbicules and pollen exine formation, which is initiated by OsDIL genes (Zhang et al., 2010). DREB proteins involves in ABA-dependent and independent pathways to enhance the stress tolerance (Lata and Prasad, 2011). Similarly, GAPDH gene participates in cell proliferation, regulation of telomere length, apoptotic pathway and DNA repair (Kosova et al., 2017). WRKY 11 gene induces systemic resistance through JA/ethylene mediated metabolic pathway (Jiang et al., 2016). However, P4H is responsible for hydroxylating proline-rich peptides influencing carbohydrate, lipid, protein and DNA metabolisms during plant growth and development (Asif et al., 2009). DHN genes confer stress tolerance due to the structural stabilization with chaperon-like activity to protect the macromolecules in cells (Koag et al., 2003; Porat et al., 2004). The pH is a fundamental factor for biological processes. Vacuolar H+-ATPase regulates the pH of cells, which results to stabilize the membrane, protein degradation, transport of small molecules and several metabolisms (Forgac, 2007). During heat and osmotic stresses, sHSP genes are expressed to conserve the metabolic reactions in cells (Schoffl et al., 1998). PR-10 genes initiate and reprogramme the protein synthesis in pathogen infected or abiotic stress exposed plants (Xu P. et al., 2014). An antioxidant stimulating gene, APX plays a major role in redox condition of the electron transport machinery of chloroplast by regulating H2O2 levels (Davletova et al., 2005). In addition, rbcL and rbcS genes drive the synthesis of Rubisco enzymes for CO2 fixation during photosynthesis (Andersson and Backlund, 2008).

Some studies have revealed that tolerance against drought in bacteria-treated plants is associated with higher gene expression levels of OsDIL, OsDREB1A, OsGAPDH, OsWRKY11, P4H, Cadhn, VA, sHSP, CaPR-10, cAPX, rbcL, and rbcS gene expression (Khan et al., 2011; Wang et al., 2012; Kasim et al., 2013; Lim and Kim, 2013; Timmusk et al., 2015) and lower gene expression levels of APX1 (ascorbate peroxidase 1), SAMS1 (S-adenosyl-methionine synthetase 1, which acts as methyl donor and a precursor to polyamines synthesis (Sofia et al., 2001) and HSP17.8 (heat shock protein 17.8) gene expression (Kakar et al., 2016). Plant drought tolerance may be accomplished by the interaction with Bacillus spp. resulting in enhanced water uptake, transport of nutrients, synthesis of hormones and pigments, and by the regulation of drought stress related genes and enzymes.

Bacillus spp. applications to improve plant health in saline soil

Climatic changes in the environment affect regular rainfall each year. Salinity in agricultural land has been spreading worldwide due to low rainfall, high water evaporation rates and improper irrigation practices (Al-Karaki, 2006). The accumulation of salt in soil reduces the soil water potential and affects water and nutrient uptake by plant roots (Porcel et al., 2012). Under conditions of salinity, crop plants face disorder in several metabolic pathways, such as those related to photosynthesis, respiration, redox system homeostasis, phytohormone regulation, and carbohydrate and amino acid synthesis, which leads to reduced seed germination, plant growth and yield (Munns and Tester, 2008; Rady, 2011; Radhakrishnan and Lee, 2013, 2014). A microbial inoculation that includes Bacillus spp. can enhance plant growth during salt stress, which is an eco-friendly approach to sustainable agriculture (Radhakrishnan et al., 2014; Hashem et al., 2015, 2016a,b). The multiple plant growth-promoting characteristics (phosphate solubilization, ammonia, IAA and siderophore production) of Bacillus licheniformis A2 mitigate the detrimental effects of salt stress and increase plant growth in stressed peanut plants (Goswami et al., 2014). The association of Bacillus spp. with plants alters the plant metabolism in stressed plants to increase plant growth (Table (Table2).2). To tolerate salt stress, plants must prevent the excess uptake of Na+ and Cl, but they need to continue the uptake of essential nutrients, such as K+ and NO3- (Jeschke and Wolf, 1988). Exopolysaccharide (EPS) in the rhizosphere soil binds Na+ and inhibits Na+ transport into plant root cells (Figure (Figure1).1). Inoculating wheat seedlings with EPS-producing Bacillus insolitus MAS17 and certain other Bacillus spp. covers the root zones with soil sheaths and restricts the passive flow of Na+ into the stele to mitigate salt stress effects (Ashraf et al., 2004). The bacteria-induced enhancement of the K+/Na+ ratio in plants grown in saline soil mitigates the effects of salinity stress (Han et al., 2014). The elevated levels of N, P, K, Ca, Mg, S, Mn, Cu, and Fe produced in salt-affected plants by the interaction with Bacillus spp. maintains plant growth during stress (Jha and Subramanian, 2012; Karlidag, 2013). The salt-tolerant bacteria increase the relative water content as well as the osmotic and turgor potential to improve the growth of salt-injured plants (Yang et al., 2016).

Bacillus spp. reduce the toxic effects of salinity in plants by inhibiting lipid peroxidation (Han et al., 2014). Hashem et al. (2015) proved that B. subtilis improved lipid synthesis, specifically that of oleic, linoleic, and linolenic acids as well as phospholipids, in plants grown under salt stress. This increase in lipid synthesis might mitigate lipid peroxidation and oxidative stress in the plants. ROS production is controlled by antioxidant enzymes. In bacteria-treated plants, APX and SOD activities are decreased, while nitrate reductase (NR; EC 1.7.1.1), CAT and POD activities are enhanced (Jha and Subramanian, 2012, 2015). Bacillus pumilus associated with the roots of salt-stressed rice plants reduces the activity of caspase (Jha and Subramanian, 2014), which is a protease that belongs to the cysteine endopeptidase family and is involved in programmed cell death in plants (Groten et al., 2006). The reduction of caspase activity decreases ROS formation and programmed cell death and reprograms the action of antioxidants to accomplish plant tolerance (Jha and Subramanian, 2014). Salt-tolerant B. subtilis RH-4 improves seed germination and plant growth by enhancing the synthesis of photosynthetic pigments, carbohydrates, proteins and osmolytes, such as proline, glycine betaine and choline, in salt-injured chickpea plants (Qurashi and Sabri, 2013). The regulation of these primary metabolic pathways in plants to protect against salinity-induced disorders promotes crop tolerance. In addition, some of the secondary metabolites, such as gallic acid, caffeic acid, syringic acid, vanillic acid, ferulic acid, cinnamic acid, and quercetin, are increased in plants associated with bacteria, which allows plants to tolerate salt stress (Tiwari et al., 2011).

The regulation of hormones under stress conditions is a complex phenomenon. Hormone levels are up- or down-regulated by environmental factors. ABA accumulation in plants grown under salt stress induces stomatal closure to reduce water loss and increases salt tolerance via stress responsive genes (Leung and Giraudat, 1998; Herrera-Medina et al., 2007), while bacterial inoculation decreases the stress-induced ABA synthesis and protects plants from the effects of stress (Kang et al., 2014b). Similarly, Bacillus spp. can produce plant hormones to enhance the concentrations of IAA and GA but reduce the synthesis of ABA in plants grown under salt stress (Mohamed and Gomaa, 2012). Several gene families are affected by salinity, and their transcriptional disorder retards plant growth. However, bacteria stimulate the expression of the NADP-Me2 (NADP malic enzyme 2), EREBP (ethylene-responsive element-binding protein), SOSI (salt overly sensitive 1), BADH (betaine aldehyde dehydrogenase) and SERK1 (somatic embryogenesis receptor-like kinase 1) genes, while the GIG (gigantea) and SAPK4 (serine threonine protein kinase) genes in plants are down-regulated due to salinity (Nautiyal et al., 2013). Overall reports suggest that plants can tolerate soil salinity by the effect of Bacillus spp. induced regulation of several genes, proteins, antioxidant enzymes, pigments, hormones, nutrient transport and prevention of excess sodium transport in plant system.

The influence of Bacillus spp. on plant growth during heavy metal accumulation in soil

Agricultural lands contaminated with trace metals deposited from industrial effluents and agro-chemicals affect the ecological food chain, including crop cultivation, and alter microbial communities (Hu et al., 2009; Ashraf et al., 2017). Accumulated Cu, Mn, and Zn are considered major pollutants in soil and water, and these metals cannot be easily degraded into harmless substances (Ma et al., 2009; Arthur et al., 2012). Chelators are used to reduce metal toxicity but are also harmful to living organisms (Tandy et al., 2006). In contrast, microorganisms solubilize or convert toxic metals to non-toxic forms, which is applicable to the integrated management of heavy metal phytoremediation (Bosecker, 1997; Kang et al., 2015c). The inoculation of Bacillus spp. into heavy metal-contaminated soil can possibly reduce the toxic effects of these metals on plant growth. The bacteria support plant growth by increasing water uptake and reducing electrolyte leakage to mitigate Cd stress (Ahmad et al., 2014). B. licheniformis enhances Cu, Zn, Cd, Cr and Pb accumulation and distribution in plants grown in heavy metal-contaminated soil, which leads to reduced levels of toxic metals in soil (Brunetti et al., 2012). Similarly, excess amounts of Cd in soil reduce nutrient (P, Fe, Zn, and Mn) uptake in plants, but bacteria promote an increase in the levels of these nutrients in plants to protect against the effect of Cd (Malekzadeh et al., 2012 and Figure Figure1).1). The association of some Bacillus spp. increases the P and Ca contents and reduces Ni accumulation in plants grown in contaminated soil (Jamil et al., 2014). The beneficial effects of the interaction with Bacillus spp. (enhancement of water, ions, pigments and enzymes) in heavy metal-affected plants are shown in Table Table22.

Heavy metal deposition in soil affects the redox state of plant metabolism by inducing signaling molecules such as ROS. Excess ROS generation damages lipid membranes and causes lipid peroxidation (Kang et al., 2015c). The contamination of soil with the most common industrial toxic metals, Pb and As, accelerates lipid peroxidation in affected plants. Bacillus spp. alleviate this stress effect by reducing lipid peroxidation and SOD activity and increasing amylase and protease to promote plant growth in heavy metal-polluted soil (Pandey et al., 2013). Similarly, bacteria support plant tolerance against Zn and Cu stress by enhancing the activities of ROS scavenging enzymes, such as POD, SOD, CAT, APX, and DHAR (Gururani et al., 2013; Wang et al., 2013). Cr stress reduces acid phosphatase activity in plants, but bacterial treatment elevates the activity of this enzyme (Riaz et al., 2010). The regulation of antioxidants in cells inhibits oxidative stress damage and triggers plant growth-promoting substances to enable plants to adapt to metal stress. Bacillus-mediated plant tolerance against Ni and Cr stresses is achieved through the enhancement of photosynthetic pigments and leghemoglobin, which leads to increased crop yield (Wani and Khan, 2010; Jamil et al., 2014). The plant growth and survival at heavy metal polluted soil can be achieved by increasing the balanced uptake of mineral nutrients and pigments synthesis, and also modulating the endogenous antioxidants due to the association of Bacillus spp. To understand the mitigation mechanisms of Bacillus spp. against heavy metal pollution, more plant physiological studies are required.

Mitigation of biotic stresses in plants by Bacillus spp. inoculation

Bacillus-induced pest control and plant protection

In organic farming, the use of bacterial agents is considered an environmentally friendly and safe method to increase crop productivity in the presence of pests (Dihazi et al., 2012). Plant-beneficial Bacillus spp. reduce the use of chemical fertilizers and pesticides for the sustainable production of various crops in modern agriculture (Myresiotis et al., 2015). For example, thiamethoxam is an insecticide used to control an extensive range of pests, such as aphids, beetles, lepidopteran species, thrips and whiteflies (Karmakar and Kulshrestha, 2009), but this compound causes a decline in insects beneficial to plants, such as honey bees; therefore, the use of this chemical in seed coating has been banned by the European Union (Girolami et al., 2009). Alternatively, eco-friendly microbial pesticides can fill the gap formed by the discontinuation of chemical pesticides use in the field of agriculture. A well-known bio-insecticide, B. thuringiensis, can control a broad range of diverse insects for pest management in the agricultural field (Navon, 2000). For example, the insects Helicoverpa armigera, Spodoptera littoralis, Oryzophagus oryzae, Spodoptera frugiperda, and Chilo partellus are damaging to plant growth and fruit, but B. thuringiensis inhibits the larval growth of insects and increases plant growth and yield (Brownbridge, 2001; Berlitz et al., 2012; Benfarhat-Touzri et al., 2014; Arrizubieta et al., 2016) without affecting other microbial populations within the phyllosphere (Wang et al., 2014). Some other Bacillus spp., such as B. cereus, B. subtilis, and B. amyloliquefaciens, are also involved in pest control (Gadhave and Gange, 2016).

The mechanism of Bacillus-induced pest control in plants varies with pest species as well as plant genotype (Navon, 2000; Paramasiva et al., 2014; Mnif and Ghribi, 2015; Wielkopolan and Obrepalska-Steplowska, 2016). Bacillus spp. kill pest larvae and induce systemic resistance in plants (Table (Table2).2). Pesticide-producing Bacillus spp. in soil and roots support plant growth and increase the uptake and systemic translocation of pesticide (thiamethoxam) throughout the entire plant to control pest infestations (Myresiotis et al., 2015). Bacillus spp. colonize plant parts, including the phyllosphere, and larvae and/or adult pests ingest the Bacillus-containing plant tissues during feeding. A primary site of bacterial infection begins with extensive damage to the larval midgut epithelium by bacterial crystal proteins, which interact with chitin and peritrophic membranes (Vachon et al., 2012; Feng et al., 2015; Figure Figure1).1). During later stages of infection, Bacillus spp. crystal protein endotoxin, lipopeptides and polyketides (iturin, fengycin, surfactin, bacillomycin, bacillaene, macrolactin, and difficidin) modify the vacuolization of the cytoplasm, induce vesicle formation, lyse brush border membrane, and degenerate apical membranes, leading to damage of microvilli and finally causing larval death (Ben-Khedher et al., 2015a; Boukedi et al., 2016). Surfactin attaches to the Ca2+ receptor site and changes the peptide composition in the cellular phospholipid bilayer (Maget-Dana and Ptak, 1995), while iturin increases cell membrane permeability via the formation of ion-conducting pores (Maget-Dana and Peypoux, 1994). Bacillus spp. elicit the JA-pathway-related genes and simultaneously increase the gene expression for other secondary metabolites (allelochemicals, which inhibit pest larval growth) in plants to defend against pests (Zebelo et al., 2016). The obtained reports suggest that Bacillus spp. control the larval population of pest and trigger the ISR mechanism and allelochemicals in plants to prevent the pest damage.

Bacterial disease prevention in plants by the application of Bacillus spp.

Plant disease-causing pathogenic bacteria, fungi, viruses and nematodes are major challenges in maintaining plant health and yield in agricultural lands (Hussey and McGuire, 1987; Guo et al., 2013; Narasimhan and Shivakumar, 2015). The application of plant-beneficial microorganisms is an alternative to chemical fungicides, bactericides and nematicides and an effective environmentally friendly approach to improving plant growth and controlling many plant diseases (Choudhary and Johri, 2009; Radhakrishnan et al., 2013; Adam et al., 2014; Egamberdieva et al., 2014). Bacillus spp. inhibit pathogenic microbial growth in soil and/or in plant tissues as well as the detrimental effects of the pathogens in plants. For example, pathogenic bacteria such as Ralstonia solanacearum, Pseudomonas savastanoi and Xanthomonas axonopodis infect plants and generate diseases, whereas Bacillus spp. inoculation suppresses pathogen growth and protects plants from diseases (Krid et al., 2012; Yi et al., 2013). Biofilm formation around the root surface by Bacillus spp. and their secretion of toxins (surfactin, iturin, macrolactin, bacillomycin, and fengycin) destroy the pathogenic bacterial populations and reduce disease incidence in plants (Chen et al., 2013; Huang et al., 2014; Elshakh et al., 2016; Hinarejos et al., 2016; Figure Figure1).1). The secretions of Bacillus spp. degrade the pathogenic bacterial cell walls and change the cell morphology to kill the pathogen (Elshakh et al., 2016).

In addition, pathogenic bacteria, including R. solanacearum and Xanthomonas oryzae, affect plant defense systems by decreasing phenylalanine ammonia-lyase (PAL; EC 4.3.1.24), POD, PPO, SOD, CAT, and lipoxygenase (LOX; EC 1.13.11) activities, but these defense enzyme activities are accelerated in diseased plants following the administration of Bacillus spp. (Chithrashree et al., 2011; Almoneafy et al., 2013; Kurabachew and Wydra, 2014; Table Table2).2). PAL is involved in the biosynthesis of polyphenol compounds (lignin, flavonoids and phenylpropanoids) and triggering the plant resistance against environmental stimuli (Fritz et al., 1976; Tanaka et al., 1989). However, the systemic resistance to diseases induced in plants by Bacillus spp. is made possible by increasing SA content and the gene and protein expression of proteinase inhibitor II (Pin2) and pathogen resistant 1 (PR1) (Jiang et al., 2015; Fousia et al., 2016; Hinarejos et al., 2016).

Effects of Bacillus spp. inoculation on crop protection from pathogenic fungi

The antagonistic activity of Bacillus spp. controls the mycelial growth of fungi, preventing plant fungal disease (Abdalla, 2015; Chowdhury et al., 2015a; Akram et al., 2016; Aydi-Ben-Abdallah et al., 2016) and increasing plant growth and yield (Narasimhan and Shivakumar, 2015). Populations of Bacillus spp. can be successfully established in the soil and root rhizospheres without any lasting effects on other bacterial populations (Chowdhury et al., 2015a). Bacillus spp. attach to the mycelial cell walls, and the chitosanase (EC 3.2.1.123), protease (EC 3.4.21.112), cellulase (EC 3.2.1.4), glucanase (EC 3.2.1.21), siderophores, and HCN of the bacteria crack and deform the hyphae, which leads to altered cell structure and functions due to vacuolation and protoplast leakage (Ben-Khedher et al., 2015b; Han et al., 2015; Narendra-Babu et al., 2015). Bacterially synthesized antifungal peptides, such as iturin, fengycin, mixirin, pumilacidin, surfactin, and a novel cyclic peptide with a molecular weight of 852.4 Da, are involved in the destruction of the pathogenic fungi in rhizospheres (Han et al., 2015; Yamamoto et al., 2015; Figure Figure1).1). Bacillus spp. mitigate pathogen-induced biotic stress via physiological changes (Table (Table2)2) in the photosynthetic and respiratory pathways and the regulation of carbohydrate, phenyl-propanoid and N metabolism and defense-related proteins in diseased plants (Jain et al., 2015). Gene expression patterns in plants are also altered during infection by pathogenic fungi, and a number of dependent genes are activated to protect the plant from biotic stresses. The expression of genes encoding β-1,3-glucanase (PR-2), chitinase (PR-3 and PR-4), peroxidase (PR-9), lipid transfer protein (PR-14), metallothionein-like protein (LfMT1), oxalate oxidase (LpOXO4), lipoxygenase (LOX), and a putative defensin (LpTHb) are upregulated, whereas the putative glycine-rich protein (LfGRP1) and PsbR protein of photosystem 2 (LfPsbR) genes are downregulated in diseased plants treated with Bacillus spp. (Liu et al., 2010; Kim et al., 2015; Rahman et al., 2015). The gene expression of major antioxidants and defense enzymes, such as POD, PAL, SOD, CAT, and PPO, is also stimulated during Bacillus spp. treatment (Narendra-Babu et al., 2015; Yang et al., 2015). The higher levels of energy, metabolism and defense-related proteins in Bacillus-treated diseased plants induce systemic resistance (Sarosh et al., 2009). The stress-induced transcriptional changes in plants trigger the production of secondary metabolites and defense enzymes to reduce oxidative damage. Antagonistic Bacillus spp. reduce lipid peroxidation and increase antioxidant enzymes, such as APX, CAT, GR, GPX, POD, PPO, other defense enzymes, such as PAL, chitinase (EC 3.2.1.14), and β-1,3-glucanase (EC 3.2.1.39), and phenolic acids to alleviate the adverse effects of pathogenic infection (Solanki et al., 2012; Chowdappa et al., 2013; Jain et al., 2013). The activity of hormones in plant immunity is well documented, and in particular, the synthesis of SA and JA plays a major role in plant defense. The cross talk among hormones is a complex process that induces disease resistance. Chowdappa et al. (2013) and Kang et al. (2015b) proved that the plant growth-promoting hormones IAA and GA are increased in Bacillus-treated plants along with SA, while JA and ABA are decreased in pathogen-infected plants. However, the studies on beneficial effect of Bacillus spp. in plants against fungal diseases conclude that the detrimental effects due to fungal infection in plants can be mitigated during the inoculation of Bacillus spp. by reprogramming the activity of plant defense enzymes and hormones. Additional physiological and molecular studies are required to elucidate the bio-control mechanisms of Bacillus spp. against pathogenic fungi-induced disease in crops.

Bacillus spp.-plant interactions for viral and nematode disease resistance

The second largest group of plant diseases after fungi is caused by viruses. The most effective method of virus control has been accomplished by chemical treatments. The prolonged use of chemicals leads to deposits in soil and increases the drug resistance of plant pathogens (Zhao et al., 2017). Some of the Bacillus spp., produce the antiviral compounds against pathogen (Esawy et al., 2011). Very few studies have reported on the bio-control effects of bacteria in preventing or resisting viral disease. The disease rate is reduced as a consequence of induced systemic resistance (ISR) by interaction with Bacillus spp., leading to enhanced plant growth during cucumber mosaic virus infection (Zhang et al., 2004). The biofilm formation and surfactin production from B. amyloliquefaciens plantarum defense the viral disease in plants by triggering ISR machinery (Chowdhury et al., 2015b). Similarly, Bacillus spp. induce systemic resistance against viral disease caused by tobacco mosaic virus by inhibiting viral coat protein synthesis and by increasing the expression of disease-resistant signaling genes (Coil and NPR1), defense genes (PR-1a and PR-1b) and cell wall expansin (NtEXP2 and NtEXP6) genes in plants (Wang, 2009). The NPRI and Coil genes regulate the ISR- and JA-dependent pathways, respectively (Xie et al., 1998; Mou et al., 2003), which indicates that Bacillus spp. application can prevent viral damage in plants. However, crops are also damaged by nematodes, which are plant parasites and are recognized as a severe threat to plant growth. Root-knot nematodes have been recorded as the most damaging parasite relative to other types of nematodes worldwide. The host range of this nematode covers nearly 5500 plant species (Trudgill and Blok, 2001). The application of a bacterial inoculation controls the nematode populations. For example, Bacillus spp. prevent root-knot nematode infection in crops and develop resistance by reducing gall and egg masses in plants (Adam et al., 2014). Antimicrobial peptides, bacteriocins synthesized from Bacillus spp. inhibit the growth of pathogenic nematodes (Chowdhury et al., 2015b). Liu et al. (2013) identified the PZN gene cluster in B. amyloliquefaciens, and revealed that these genes are responsible for nematicidal activity against nematodes. In addition, the secretion of crystal proteins (Cry5B and Cry6A) from Bacillus spp. controls the growth of free-living (Caenorhabditis elegans) and plant-parasitic (Meloidogyne hapla) nematodes (Yu et al., 2015). Cry5B binds with glycolipids receptors, leading to intestinal damage in C. elegans. Moreover, Cry6A restricts the growth of nematodes by inhibiting egg hatch, motility and infection to host tissues (Kho et al., 2011; Yu et al., 2015). The documented results of Bacillus spp. against virus and nematode suggest that some of the metabolites synthesized from Bacillus spp. inhibit the viral and nematodes population and increase the plant resistance through the expression of defense genes.

Conclusions

Crop productivity is decreasing due to climatic changes, and human populations are increasing daily, which results in starvation problems in under-developed countries. Research is ongoing to enhance crop yields despite various unfavorable environmental conditions. Physical, chemical and biological methods are being used to address the biotic and abiotic stress-induced damage in plants. The mutualistic relationship between plants and microbes is well known, especially the interactions between plants and bacteria either from the soil or inside the plants that help to improve the plant health under adverse stress conditions. The plant-beneficial Bacillus spp. produce plant growth-promoting substances (hormones and solubilizing enzymes) to increase plant growth. During drought and with salinity and heavy metal accumulation in the soil as well as pathogen infection, crop productivity is reduced, but the association with Bacillus ssp. promotes crop yield via various metabolites. Some of the physiological alterations in plants during Bacillus spp. inoculation in stress environments slow plant aging. For example, the ethylene-suppressing enzyme (ACC deaminase) synthesized by Bacillus spp. mitigates the detrimental effects of abiotic and biotic stress in plants by delaying senescence. Exopolysaccharide production by Bacillus spp. has been frequently reported to reduce sodium ion transport and regulate plant nutrient uptake during salinity stress. Additionally, the lipopeptides and toxic substances secreted from Bacillus spp. prevent pathogen growth and reduce disease occurrence in crops. The plant growth-promoting activities of Bacillus spp. have been well-documented as evidenced by increased growth of roots, shoots, and leaves as well as enhanced yields. However, very few studies have been conducted regarding the physiological and molecular aspects of these processes. Some of these studies have revealed that Bacillus spp. regulate nutrient uptake, water transport, and antioxidant, pigment, hormone and stress-responsive genes and proteins in plants leading to tolerance under adverse environmental conditions. This review concludes that Bacillus spp. are biological organisms that can potentially induce stress tolerance in plants, and more genomics, proteomics and metabolomics studies are required to elucidate the mechanism of Bacillus-plant interactions for biotic and abiotic stress management in crops.

Author contributions

RR, AH and EA collected the research article information and wrote and revised the article together in a parallel manner. All the authors approved the final version of this manuscript.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to extend their sincere appreciation to the College of Science and College of Food & Agricultural Sciences at King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Additionally, the authors would like to extend their sincere appreciation to Yeungnam University, Gyeongsan, South Korea.

References

  • Abdalla M. Y. (2015). Biological control and induction of systemic resistance against cucumber fusarium wilt by plant growth promoting rhizo-organisms. Egypt. J. Biol. Pest Cont. 25, 407–413.
  • Adam M., Heuer H., Hallmann J. (2014). Bacterial antagonists of fungal pathogens also control root-knot nematodes by induced systemic resistance of tomato plants. PLoS ONE 9:e90402. 10.1371/journal.pone.0090402 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Ahmad I., Akhtar M. J., Zahir Z. A., Naveed M., Mitter B., Sessitsch A. (2014). Cadmium-tolerant bacteria induce metal stress tolerance in cereals. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 21, 11054–11065. 10.1007/s11356-014-3010-9 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Akram W., Anjum T., Ali B. (2016). Phenylacetic acid is ISR determinant produced by Bacillus fortis IAGS162, which involves extensive re-modulation in metabolomics of tomato to protect against fusarium wilt. Front. Plant Sci. 7:498. 10.3389/fpls.2016.00498 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Al-Karaki G. N. (2006). Nursery inoculation of tomato with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and subsequent performance under irrigation with saline water. Sci. Hortic. 109, 1–7. 10.1016/j.scienta.2006.02.019 [Cross Ref]
  • Almoneafy A. A., Ojaghian M. R., Xu S., Ibrahim M., Xie G., Shi Y., et al. (2013). Synergistic effect of acetyl salicylic acid and DL-Beta- aminobutyric acid on biocontrol efficacy of Bacillus strains against tomato bacterial wilt. Trop. Plant Pathol. 38, 102–113. 10.1590/S1982-56762013000200003 [Cross Ref]
  • Andersson I., Backlund A. (2008). Structure and function of rubisco. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 46, 275–291. 10.1016/j.plaphy.2008.01.001 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Arkhipova T. N., Veselov S. U., Melentiev A. I., Martynenko E. V., Kudoyarova G. R. (2005). Ability of bacterium Bacillus subtilis to produce cytokinins and to influence the growth and endogenous hormone content of lettuce plants. Plant Soil. 272, 201–209. 10.1007/s11104-004-5047-x [Cross Ref]
  • Armada E., Azcon R., Lopez-Castillo O. M., Calvo-Polanco M., Ruiz-Lozano J. M. (2015). Autochthonous arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and Bacillus thuringiensis from a degraded Mediterranean area can be used to improve physiological traits and performance of a plant of agronomic interest under drought conditions. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 90, 64–74. 10.1016/j.plaphy.2015.03.004 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Armada E., Roldan A., Azcon R. (2014). Differential activity of autochthonous bacteria in controlling drought stress in native lavandula and salvia plants species under drought conditions in natural arid soil. Microb. Ecol. 67, 410–420. 10.1007/s00248-013-0326-9 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Arrizubieta M., Simon O., Torres-Vila L. M., Figueiredo E., Mendiola J., Mexia A., et al. . (2016). Insecticidal efficacy and persistence of a co-occluded binary mixture of Helicoverpa armigera nucleopolyhedrovirus (HearNPV) variants in protected and field-grown tomato crops on the Iberian Peninsula. Pest Manag. Sci. 72, 660–670. 10.1002/ps.4035 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Arthur E., Moldrup P., Holmstrup M., Schjonning P., Winding A., Mayer P., et al. (2012). Soil microbial and physical properties and their relations along a steep copper gradient. Agricult. Ecosys. Environ. 159, 9–18. 10.1016/j.agee.2012.06.021 [Cross Ref]
  • Ashraf M. A., Hussain I., Rasheed R., Iqbal M., Riaz M., Arif M. S. (2017). Advances in microbe-assisted reclamation of heavy metal contaminated soils over the last decade: a review. J. Environ. Manag. 198, 132–143. 10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.04.060 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Ashraf M., Hasnain S., Berge O., Mahmood T. (2004). Inoculating wheat seedlings with exopolysaccharide-producing bacteria restricts sodium uptake and stimulates plant growth under salt stress. Biol. Fertil. Soils 40, 157–162. 10.1007/s00374-004-0766-y [Cross Ref]
  • Asif M. H., Trivedi P. K., Misra P., Nath P. (2009). Prolyl-4-hydroxylase (AtP4H1) mediates and mimics low oxygen response in Arabidopsis thaliana. Funct. Integr. Genomics 9, 525–535. 10.1007/s10142-009-0118-y [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Aydi-Ben-Abdallah R., Jabnoun-Khiareddine H., Nefzi A., Mokni-Tlili S., Daami-Remadi M. (2016). Biocontrol of fusarium wilt and growth promotion of tomato plants using endophytic bacteria isolated from Solanum elaeagnifolium stems. J. Phytopathol. 164, 811–824. 10.1111/jph.12501 [Cross Ref]
  • Barker A. V., Maynard D. N., Mills H. A. (1974). Variations in nitrate accumulation among spinach cultivars. J. Am. Soc. Horticult. Sci. 99, 32–134.
  • Barnawal D., Maji D., Bharti N., Chanotiya C. S., Kalra A. (2013). ACC deaminase-containing Bacillus subtilis reduces stress ethylene-induced damage and improves mycorrhizal colonization and rhizobial nodulation in Trigonella foenum-graecum under drought stress. J. Plant Growth Regul. 32, 809–822. 10.1007/s00344-013-9347-3 [Cross Ref]
  • Beauregard P. B., Chai Y., Vlamakis H., Losick R., Kolter R. (2013). Bacillus subtilis biofilm induction by plant polysaccharides. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 110, E1621–E1630. 10.1073/pnas.1218984110 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Benfarhat-Touzri D., Amira A., Ben khedher S., Ben Givaudan A., Jaoua S., Tounsi S. (2014). Combinatorial effect of Bacillus thuringiensis kurstaki and Photorhabdus luminescens against Spodoptera littoralis (Lepidoptera: noctuidae). J. Basic Microbiol. 54, 1160–1165. 10.1002/jobm.201300142 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Ben-Khedher S., Boukedi H., Kilani-Feki O., Chaib I., Laarif A., Abdelkefi-Mesrati L., et al. . (2015a). Bacillus amyloliquefaciens AG1 biosurfactant: putative receptor diversity and histopathological effects on Tuta absoluta midgut. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 132, 42–47. 10.1016/j.jip.2015.08.010 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Ben-Khedher S., Kilani-Feki O., Dammak M., Jabnoun-Khiareddine H., Daami-Remadi M., Tounsi S. (2015b). Efficacy of Bacillus subtilis V26 as a biological control agent against Rhizoctonia solani on potato. C. R. Biol. 338, 784–792. 10.1016/j.crvi.2015.09.005 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Berlitz D. L., de-Azambuja A. O., Sebben A., de-Oliveira J. V., Fiuza L. M. (2012). Mortality of Oryzophagus oryzae (costa Lima, 1936) (coleoptera: curculionidae) and spodoptera frugiperda (J E Smith, 1797) (Lepidoptera: noctuidae) larvae exposed to Bacillus thuringiensis and extracts of melia azedarach. Brazilian Arch. Biol. Technol. 55, 725–731. 10.1590/S1516-89132012000500012 [Cross Ref]
  • Bidondo L. F., Bompadre J., Pergola M., Silvani V., Colombo R., Bracamonte F., et al. (2012). Differential interaction between two Glomus intraradices strains and a phosphate solubilizing bacterium in maize rhizosphere. Pedobiologia 55, 227–232. 10.1016/j.pedobi.2012.04.001 [Cross Ref]
  • Boomsma C. R., Vyn T. J. (2008). Maize drought tolerance: potential improvements through arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis?. Field Crops Res. 108, 14–31. 10.1016/j.fcr.2008.03.002 [Cross Ref]
  • Bosecker K. (1997). Bioleaching: metal solubilization by microorganisms. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 20, 591–604. 10.1111/j.1574-6976.1997.tb00340.x [Cross Ref]
  • Boukedi H., Sellami S., Ktari S., Belguith-Ben-Hassan N., Sellami-Boudawara T., Tounsi S., et al. (2016). Isolation and characterization of a new Bacillus thuringiensis strain with a promising toxicity against Lepidopteran pests. Microbiol. Res. 186–187, 9–15. 10.1016/j.micres.2016.02.004 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Brannen P., Kenney D. (1997). Kodiak-A successful biological-con- trol product for suppression of soil-borne plant pathogens of cotton. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 19, 169–171. 10.1038/sj.jim.2900439 [Cross Ref]
  • Brownbridge M. (2001). Greenhouse trials of new Bacillus thuringiensis isolates for control of chilo partellus larvae in sorghum. Phytoparasitica 29, 292–298. 10.1007/BF02981845 [Cross Ref]
  • Brunetti G., Farrag K., Soler-Rovira P., Ferrara M., Nigro F., Senesi N. (2012). The effect of compost and Bacillus licheniformis on the phytoextraction of Cr, Cu, Pb and Zn by three brassicaceae species from contaminated soils in the Apulia region, Southern Italy. Geoderma 170, 322–330. 10.1016/j.geoderma.2011.11.029 [Cross Ref]
  • Cakmak I. (2005). The role of potassium in alleviating detrimental effects of abiotic stresses in plants. J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci. 168, 521–530. 10.1002/jpln.200420485 [Cross Ref]
  • Castillo P., Escalante M., Gallardo M., Alemano S., Abdala G. (2013). Effects of bacterial single inoculation and co-inoculation on growth and phytohormone production of sunflower seedlings under water stress. Acta Physiol. Plant. 35, 2299–2309. 10.1007/s11738-013-1267-0 [Cross Ref]
  • Cawoy H., Bettiol W., Fickers P., Ongena M. (2011). Bacillus-based biological control of plant diseases, in Pesticides in the Modern World - Pesticides Use and Management, ed Stoytcheva, editor. (InTech Academic Press; ), 273–302.
  • Chakraborty U., Chakraborty B. N., Chakraborty A. P., Dey P. L. (2013). Water stress amelioration and plant growth promotion in wheat plants by osmotic stress tolerant bacteria. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 29, 789–803. 10.1007/s11274-012-1234-8 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Chen Y., Yan F., Chai Y., Liu H., Kolter R., Losick R., et al. . (2013). Biocontrol of tomato wilt disease by Bacillus subtilis isolates from natural environments depends on conserved genes mediating biofilm formation. Environ. Microbiol. 15, 848–864. 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2012.02860.x [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Chithrashree A. C., Udayashankar S., Chandra-Nayaka S., Reddy M. S., Srinivas C. (2011). Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria mediate induced systemic resistance in rice against bacterial leaf blight caused by Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae. Biol. Control 59, 114–122. 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2011.06.010 [Cross Ref]
  • Choudhary D. K. (2011). Plant growth promotion (PGP) activities and molecular characterization of rhizobacterial strains isolated from soybean (Glycine max L. Merril) plants against charcoal rot pathogen, Macrophomina phaseolina. Biotechnol. Lett. 33, 2287–2295. 10.1007/s10529-011-0699-0 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Choudhary D. K., Johri B. N. (2009). Interactions of Bacillus spp. and plants - with special reference to induced systemic resistance (ISR). Microbiol. Res. 164, 493–513. 10.1016/j.micres.2008.08.007 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Chowdappa P., Mohan-Kumar S. P., Jyothi-Lakshmi M., Upreti K. K. (2013). Growth stimulation and induction of systemic resistance in tomato against early and late blight by Bacillus subtilis OTPB1 or Trichoderma harzianum OTPB3. Biol. Control. 65, 109–117. 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2012.11.009 [Cross Ref]
  • Chowdhury S. P., Hartmann A., Gao X., Borriss R. (2015b). Biocontrol mechanism by root-associated Bacillus amyloliquefaciens FZB42-a review. Front. Microbiol. 6:780. 10.3389/fmicb.2015.00780 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Chowdhury S. P., Uhl J., Grosch R., Alqueres S., Pittroff S., Dietel K., et al. (2015a). Cyclic lipopeptides of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens subsp. plantarum colonizing the lettuce rhizosphere enhance plant defence responses towards the bottom rot pathogen Rhizoctonia solani. Mol. Plant Microb. Interact. 28, 17–18. 10.1094/MPMI-03-15-0066-R [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Davletova S., Rizhsky L., Liang H., Shengqiang Z., Oliver D. J., Coutu J., et al. . (2005). Cyto-solic ascorbate peroxidase 1 is a central component of the reactive oxygen gene network of Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 17, 268–281. 10.1105/tpc.104.026971 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • De-Willigen P. (1986). Supply of soil nitrogen to the plant during the growing season, in Fundamental, Ecological and Agricultural Aspects of Nitrogen Metabolism in Higher Plants, eds Lambers H., Neeteson J. J., Stulen I., editors. (Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff; ), 417–432.
  • Dihazi A., Jaiti F., Taktak W., Kilani-Feki O., Jaoua S., Driouich A., et al. . (2012). Use of two bacteria for biological control of bayoud disease caused by Fusarium oxysporum in date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L) seedlings. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 55, 7–15. 10.1016/j.plaphy.2012.03.003 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Ding Y., Wang J., Liu Y., Chen S. (2005). Isolation and identification of nitrogen-fixing bacilli from plant rhizospheres in Beijing region. J. Appl. Microbiol. 99, 1271–1281. 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2005.02738.x [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Dursun A., Ekinci M., Donmez M. F. (2010). Effects of foliar application of plant growth promoting bacterium on chemical contents, yield and growth of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum L.) and cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). Pak. J. Bot. 42, 3349–3356.
  • Egamberdieva D., Hashem A., Abd_Allah E. F. (2014). Biological control of fungal disease by rhizobacteria under saline soil conditions, in Emerging Technologies and Management of Crop Stress Tolerance, Vol. 2, Ed Ahmad P., editor. (Cambridge, MA: A sustainable approach. Academic Press, Cambridge; ), 161–172.
  • Elshakh A. S. A., Anjum S. I., Qiu W., Almoneafy A. A., Li W., Yang Z., et al. (2016). Controlling and defence-related mechanisms of Bacillus strains against bacterial leaf blight of rice. J. Phytopathol. 164, 534–546. 10.1111/jph.12479 [Cross Ref]
  • El-Tayeb M. A. (2005). Response of barley grains to the interactive effect of salinity and salicylic acid. Plant Growth Regul. 45, 215–224. 10.1007/s10725-005-4928-1 [Cross Ref]
  • Esawy M. A., Ahmed E. F., Helmy W. A., Mansour N. M., El-Senousy W. M., El-Safty M. M. (2011). Production of levansucrase from novel honey Bacillus subtilis isolates capable of producing antiviral levans. Carbohydr. Polym. 86, 823–830. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2011.05.035 [Cross Ref]
  • Feng D., Chen Z., Wang Z., Zhang C., He K., Guo S. (2015). Domain III of Bacillus thuringiensis Cry1Ie toxin plays an important role in binding to peritrophic membrane of Asian corn borer. PLoS ONE 10:e0136430. 10.1371/journal.pone.0136430 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Forgac M. (2007). Vacuolar ATPases: rotary proton pumps in physiology and pathophysiology. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 8, 917–929. 10.1038/nrm2272 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Fousia S., Paplomatas E. J., Tjamos S. E. (2016). Bacillus subtilis QST 713 confers protection to tomato plants against Pseudomonas syringae pv tomato and induces plant defence-related genes. J. Phytopathol. 164, 264–270. 10.1111/jph.12455 [Cross Ref]
  • Fritz R. R., Hodgins D. S., Abell C. W. (1976). Phenylalanine ammonia-lyase. induction and purification from yeast and clearance in mammals. J. Biol. Chem. 251, 4646–4650. [PubMed]
  • Gadhave K. R., Gange A. C. (2016). Plant-associated Bacillus spp. alter life-history traits of the specialist insect Brevicoryne brassicae L. Agric. For. Entomol. 18, 35–42. 10.1111/afe.12131 [Cross Ref]
  • Gagne-Bourque F., Bertrand A., Claessens A., Aliferis K. A., Jabaji S. (2016). Alleviation of drought stress and metabolic changes in timothy (Phleum pratense L.) colonized with Bacillus subtilis B26. Front. Plant Sci. 7:584. 10.3389/fpls.2016.00584 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Garcia-Fraile P., Menendez E., Rivas R. (2015). Role of bacterial biofertilizers in agriculture and forestry. AIMS Bioeng. 2, 183–205. 10.3934/bioeng.2015.3.183 [Cross Ref]
  • Gassmann W., Rubio F., Schroeder J. I. (1996). Alkali cation selectivity of the wheat root high-affinity potassium transporter HKT1. Plant J. 10, 869–882. 10.1046/j.1365-313X.1996.10050869.x [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Girolami V., Mazzon L., Squartini A., Mori N., Marzaro M., Di-Bernardo, et al. (2009). Translocation of neonicotinoid insecticides from coated seeds to seedling guttation drops: a novel way of intoxication for bees. J. Econ. Ecotoxicol. 102, 1808–1815. 10.1603/029.102.0511 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Glick B. R. (1995). The enhancement of plant growth by free-living bacteria. Can. J. Microbiol. 41, 109–117. 10.1139/m95-015 [Cross Ref]
  • Glick B. R. (2014). Bacteria with ACC deaminase can promote plant growth and help to feed the world. Microbiol. Res. 169, 30–39. 10.1016/j.micres.2013.09.009 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Goswami D., Dhandhukia P., Patel P., Thakker J. N. (2014). Screening of PGPR from saline desert of Kutch: growth promotion in Arachis hypogea by Bacillus licheniformis A2. Microbiol. Res. 169, 66–75. 10.1016/j.micres.2013.07.004 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Groten K., Dutilleul C., Van-Heerden P. D. R., Vanackera H., Bernard S., Finkemeier I., et al. . (2006). Redox regulation of peroxiredoxin and proteinases by ascorbate and thiols during pea root nodule senescence. FEBS Lett. 580, 1269–1276. 10.1016/j.febslet.2006.01.043 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Guo L., Rasool A., Li C. (2013). Antifungal substrates of bacterial origin and plant disease management, in Bacteria in Agrobiology: Disease Management,, ed Maheshwari D. K., editor. (Berlin; Heidelberg: Springer Verlag; ), 473–485.
  • Gururani M. A., Upadhyaya C. P., Baskar V., Venkatesh J., Nookaraju A., Park S. W. (2013). Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria enhance abiotic stress tolerance in Solanum tuberosum through inducing changes in the expression of ROS-scavenging enzymes and improved photosynthetic performance. J. Plant Growth Regul. 32, 245–258. 10.1007/s00344-012-9292-6 [Cross Ref]
  • Haas D., Defago G. (2005). Biological control of soil-borne pathogens by fluorescent pseudomonads. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 3, 307–319. 10.1038/nrmicro1129 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Han Q. Q., Lu X. P., Bai J. P., Qiao Y., Pare P. W., Wang S. M., Zhang J. L., et al. . (2014). Beneficial soil bacterium Bacillus subtilis (GB03) augments salt tolerance of white clover. Front. Plant Sci. 5:525. 10.3389/fpls.2014.00525 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Han Y., Zhang B., Shen Q., You C., Yu Y., Li P., et al. . (2015). Purification and identification of two antifungal cyclic peptides produced by Bacillus amyloliquefaciens L-H15. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 176, 2202–2212. 10.1007/s12010-015-1708-x [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Hashem A., Abd_Allah E. F., Alqarawi A. A., AL-Huqail A. A., Alshalawi S. R. M., Wirth S., et al. (2015). Impact of plant growth promoting Bacillus subtilis on growth and physiological parameters of Bassia indica (Indian bassia) grown udder salt stress. Pak. J. Bot. 47, 1735–1741.
  • Hashem A., Abd_Allah E. F., Alqarawi A. A., Al-Huqail A. A., Shah M. A. (2016b). Induction of osmoregulation and modulation of salt stress in Acacia gerrardii benth. by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and Bacillus subtilis (BERA 71). Bio. Med. Res. Int. 2016:6294098. 10.1155/2016/6294098 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Hashem A., Abd_Allah E. F., Alqarawi A. A., Al-Huqail A. A., Wirth S., Egamberdieva D. (2016a). The Interaction between arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and endophytic bacteria enhances plant growth of Acacia gerrardii under salt stress. Front. Microbiol. 7:1089. 10.3389/fmicb.2016.01089 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Hayat R., Ali S., Amara U., Khalid R., Ahmed I. (2010). Soil beneficial bacteria and their role in plant growth promotion: a review. Ann. Microbiol. 60, 579–598. 10.1007/s13213-010-0117-1 [Cross Ref]
  • Herrera-Medina M. J., Steinkellner S., Vierheilig H., Bote J. A. O., Garrido J. M. G. (2007). Abscisic acid determines arbuscule development and functionality in the tomato arbuscular mycorrhiza. New Phytol. 175, 554–564. 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2007.02107.x [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Hinarejos E., Castellano M., Rodrigo I., Belles J. M., Conejero V., Lopez-Gresa M. P., et al. (2016). Bacillus subtilis IAB/BS03 as a potential biological control agent. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 146, 597–608. 10.1007/s10658-016-0945-3 [Cross Ref]
  • Honma M., Shimomura T. (1978). Metabolism of 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid. Agric. Biol. Chem. 43, 1825–1831.
  • Hu N., Zheng J. F., Ding D. X., Liu J., Yang L. Q., Yin J., et al. . (2009). Metal pollution in Huayuan river in hunan province in China by manganese sulphate waste residue. Bull. Environ. Contamin. Toxicol. 83, 583–590. 10.1007/s00128-009-9802-9 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Huang J., Wei Z., Tan S., Mei X., Shen Q., Xu Y. (2014). Suppression of bacterial wilt of tomato by bioorganic fertilizer made from the antibacterial compound producing strain Bacillus amyloliquefaciens HR62. J. Agric. Food Chem. 62, 10708–10716. 10.1021/jf503136a [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Huda K. M. K., Banu M. S. A., Garg B., Tula S., Tuteja R., Tuteja N. (2013). OsACA6, a P-type IIB Ca2+ATPase promotes salinity and drought stress tolerance in tobacco by ROS scavenging and enhancing the expression of stress-responsive genes. Plant J. 76, 997–1015. 10.1111/tpj.12352 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Hussey R. S., McGuire J. M. (1987). Interactions with other organisms, in Principles and Practice of Nematode Control in Crops, eds Brown R. H., Kerry B. R., editors. (Marrickville, NSW: Academic Press; ), 294–320.
  • Jain A., Singh A., Singh S., Singh H. B. (2013). Microbial consortium-induced changes in oxidative stress markers in pea plants challenged with Sclerotinia sclerotiorum. J. Plant Growth Regul. 32, 388–398. 10.1007/s00344-012-9307-3 [Cross Ref]
  • Jain A., Singh A., Singh S., Singh V., Singh H. B. (2015). Comparative proteomic analysis in pea treated with microbial consortia of beneficial microbes reveals changes in the protein network to enhance resistance against Sclerotinia sclerotiorum. J. Plant Physiol. 182, 79–94. 10.1016/j.jplph.2015.05.004 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Jain S. M. (1998). Plant biotechnology and mutagenesis for sustainable crop improvement, in Crop Improvement for Stress Tolerance, eds Behl R. K., Singh D. K., Lodhi G. P., editors. (New Delhi: CCSHAU, Hissar and MMB; ), 218–232.
  • Jamil M., Zeb S., Anees M., Roohi A., Ahmed I., ur-Rehman S., et al. . (2014). Role of Bacillus licheniformis in phytoremediation of nickel contaminated soil cultivated with rice. Int. J. Phytoremed. 16, 554–571. 10.1080/15226514.2013.798621 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Jeschke W. D., Wolf O. (1988). External potassium is not required for root growth in saline conditions: experiments with Ricinus communis L. growth in a reciprocal split-root system. J. Exp. Bot. 39, 1149–1167. 10.1093/jxb/39.9.1149 [Cross Ref]
  • Jha Y., Subramanian R. B. (2012). Paddy physiology and enzymes level is regulated by rhizobacteria under saline stress. J. Appl. Bot. Food Qual. 173, 168–173.
  • Jha Y., Subramanian R. B. (2014). PGPR regulate caspase-like activity, programmed cell death, and antioxidant enzyme activity in paddy under salinity. Physiol. Mol. Biol. Plants 20, 1–7. 10.1007/s12298-014-0224-8 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Jha Y., Subramanian R. B. (2015). Reduced cell death and improved cell membrane integrity in rice under salinity by root associated bacteria. Theor. Exp. Plant Physiol. 27, 227–235. 10.1007/s40626-015-0047-1 [Cross Ref]
  • Jia M., Keutgen N., Matsuhashi S., Mitzuniwa C., Ito T., Fujimura T., et al. . (2001). Ion chromatographic analysis of selected free amino acids and cations to investigate the change of nitrogen metabolism by herbicide stress in soybean (Glycine max). J. Agric. Food Chem. 49, 276–280. 10.1021/jf990344c [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Jiang C. H., Huang Z. Y., Xie P., Gu C., Li K., Wang D. C., et al. . (2016). Transcription factors WRKY70 and WRKY11 served as regulators in rhizobacterium Bacillus cereus AR156-induced systemic resistance to Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000 in Arabidopsis. J. Exp. Bot. 67, 157–174. 10.1093/jxb/erv445 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Jiang C. H., Wu F., Yu Z. Y., Xie P., Ke H. J., Li H. W., et al. . (2015). Study on screening and antagonistic mechanisms of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens 54 against bacterial fruit blotch (BFB) caused by Acidovorax avenae subsp. citrulli. Microbiol. Res. 170, 95–104. 10.1016/j.micres.2014.08.009 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Jones K. M., Kobayashi H., Davies B. W., Taga M. E., Walker G. C. (2007). How rhizobial symbionts invade plants: the Sinorhizobium-Medicago model. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 5, 619–633. 10.1038/nrmicro1705 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Jumali S. S., Said I. M., Ismail I., Zainal Z. (2011). Genes induced by high concentration of salicylic acid in Mitragyna speciosa. Aust. J. Crop Sci. 5, 296–303.
  • Kakar K. U., Ren X. L., Nawaz Z., Cui Z. Q., Li B., Xie G. L., et al. . (2016). A consortium of rhizobacterial strains and biochemical growth elicitors improve cold and drought stress tolerance in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Plant Biol. 18, 471–483. 10.1111/plb.12427 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Kang S. M., Radhakrishnan R., Khan A. L., Kim M. J., Park J. M., Kim B. R., et al. . (2014b). Gibberellin secreting rhizobacterium, Pseudomonas putida H-2-3 modulates the hormonal and stress physiology of soybean to improve the plant growth under saline and drought conditions. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 84, 115–124. 10.1016/j.plaphy.2014.09.001 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Kang S. M., Radhakrishnan R., Lee I. J. (2015b). Bacillus amyloliquefaciens subsp. plantarum GR53, a potent biocontrol agent resists Rhizoctonia disease on Chinese cabbage through hormonal and antioxidants regulation. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 31, 1517–1527. 10.1007/s11274-015-1896-0 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Kang S. M., Radhakrishnan R., Lee K. E., You Y. H., Ko J. H., Kim J. H., et al. (2015a). Mechanism of plant growth promotion elicited by Bacillus sp. LKE15 in oriental melon. Acta Agric. Scand. Sect. B Soil Plant Sci. 65, 637–647. 10.1080/09064710.2015.1040830 [Cross Ref]
  • Kang S. M., Radhakrishnan R., You Y. H., Joo G. J., Lee I. J., Lee K. E., et al. . (2014a). Phosphate solubilizing Bacillus megaterium mj1212 regulates endogenous plant carbohydrates and amino acids contents to promote mustard plant growth. Indian J. Microbiol. 54, 427–433. 10.1007/s12088-014-0476-6 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Kang S. M., Radhakrishnan R., You Y. H., Khan A. L., Lee K. E., Lee J. D., et al. . (2015c). Enterobacter asburiae KE17 association regulates physiological changes and mitigates the toxic effects of heavy metals in soybean. Plant Biol. 17, 1013–1022. 10.1111/plb.12341 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Karlidag H. (2013). Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria mitigate deleterious effects of salt stress on strawberry plants (Fragaria Xananassa). Hortic. Sci. 48, 563–567.
  • Karmakar R., Kulshrestha G. (2009). Persistance, metabolism and safety evaluation of thiamethoxam in tomato crop. Pest Manag. Sci. 65, 931–937. 10.1002/ps.1776 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Kasim W. A., Osman M. E., Omar M. N., Abd-El-Daim I. A., Bejai S., Meijer J. (2013). Control of drought stress in wheat using plant-growth-promoting bacteria. J. Plant Growth Regul. 32, 122–130. 10.1007/s00344-012-9283-7 [Cross Ref]
  • Khan N., Mishra A., Chauhan P. S., Nautiyal C. S. (2011). Induction of Paenibacillus lentimorbus biofilm by sodium alginate and CaCl2 alleviates drought stress in chickpea. Ann. Appl. Biol. 159, 372–386. 10.1111/j.1744-7348.2011.00502.x [Cross Ref]
  • Kho M. F., Bellier A., Balasubramani V., Hu Y., Hsu W., Nielsen-LeRoux C., et al. . (2011). The pore-forming protein Cry5B elicits the pathogenicity of Bacillus sp. against Caenorhabditis elegans. PLoS ONE 6:e29122. 10.1371/journal.pone.0029122 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Kilian M., Steiner U., Krebs B., Junge H., Schmiedeknecht G., Hain R. (2000). FZB24® Bacillus subtilis – mode of action of a microbial agent enhancing plant vitality. Pflanzenschutz Nachr. Bayer. 1, 72–93.
  • Kim J. S., Lee J., Lee C. H., Woo S. Y., Kang H., Seo S. G., et al. . (2015). Activation of pathogenesis-related genes by the rhizobacterium, Bacillus sp. JS, which induces systemic resistance in tobacco plants. Plant Pathol. J. 31, 195–201. 10.5423/PPJ.NT.11.2014.0122 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Kleinwechter U., Gastelo M., Ritchie J., Nelson G., Asseng S. (2016). Simulating cultivar variations in potato yields for contrasting environments. Agric. Syst. 145, 51–63. 10.1016/j.agsy.2016.02.011 [Cross Ref]
  • Koag M. C., Fenton R. D., Wilkens S., Close T. J. (2003). The binding of maize DHN1 to lipid vesicles. gain of structure and lipid specificity. Plant Physiol. 131, 309–316. 10.1104/pp.011171 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Kosova A. A., Khodyreva S. N., Lavrik O. I. (2017). Role of glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) in DNA Repair. Biochem. 82, 643–654. 10.1134/S0006297917060013 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Krid S., Triki M. A., Gargouri A., Rhouma A. (2012). Biocontrol of olive knot disease by Bacillus subtilis isolated from olive leaves. Ann. Microbiol. 62, 149–154. 10.1007/s13213-011-0239-0 [Cross Ref]
  • Kuan K. B., Othman R., Rahim K. A., Shamsuddin Z. H. (2016). Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria inoculation to enhance vegetative growth, nitrogen fixation and nitrogen remobilisation of maize under greenhouse conditions. PLoS ONE 11:e0152478. 10.1371/journal.pone.0152478 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Kurabachew H., Wydra K. (2014). Induction of systemic resistance and defense-related enzymes after elicitation of resistance by rhizobacteria and silicon application against Ralstonia solanacearum in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum). Crop Prot. 57, 1–7. 10.1016/j.cropro.2013.10.021 [Cross Ref]
  • Lata C., Prasad M. (2011). Role of DREBs in regulation of abiotic stress responses in plants J. Exp. Bot. 62, 4731–4748. 10.1093/jxb/err210 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Leung J., Giraudat J. (1998). Abscisic acid signal transduction. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 49, 199–222. 10.1146/annurev.arplant.49.1.199 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Li C., Sun B., Li Y., Liu C., Wu X., Zhang D., et al. . (2016). Numerous genetic loci identified for drought tolerance in the maize nested association mapping populations. BMC Genomic. 17:894. 10.1186/s12864-016-3170-8 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Lim J. H., Kim S. D. (2013). Induction of drought stress resistance by multi-functional PGPR Bacillus licheniformis K11 in pepper. Plant Pathol. J. 29, 201–208. 10.5423/PPJ.SI.02.2013.0021 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Liu Y. H., Huang C. J., Chen C. Y. (2010). Identification and transcriptional analysis of genes involved in Bacillus cereus-induced systemic resistance in Lilium. Biologia Plant. 54, 697–702. 10.1007/s10535-010-0123-y [Cross Ref]
  • Liu Z., Budiharjo A., Wang P., Shi H., Fang J., Borriss R., et al. . (2013). The highly modified microcin peptide plantazolicin is associated with nematicidal activity of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens FZB42. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 97, 10081–10090. 10.1007/s00253-013-5247-5 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Loutfy N., El-Tayeb M. A., Hassanen A. M., Moustafa M. F. M., Sakuma Y., Inouhe M. (2012). Changes in the water status and osmotic solute contents in response to drought and salicylic acid treatments in four different cultivars of wheat (Triticum aestivum). J. Plant Res. 125, 173–184. 10.1007/s10265-011-0419-9 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Lu S., Su W., Li H., Guo Z. (2009). Abscisic acid improves osmotic tolerance of triploid Bermuda grass and involves H2O2 and NO induced antioxidant enzyme activities. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 47, 132–138. 10.1016/j.plaphy.2008.10.006 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Lyngwi N. A., Joshi S. R. (2014). Economically important Bacillus and related genera: a mini review. in Biology of Useful Plants and Microbes. ed Sen A., editor. (New Delhi: Narosa Publishing House; ), 33–43.
  • Ma Y., Rajkumar M., Freitas H. (2009). Inoculation of plant growth-promoting bacterium Achromobacter xylosoxidans strain Ax10 for the improvement of copper phytoextraction by Brassica juncea. J. Environ. Manag. 90, 831–837. 10.1016/j.jenvman.2008.01.014 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Maget-Dana R., Peypoux F. (1994). Iturins, a special class ofpore-forming lipopeptides: biological and physicochemical properties. Toxicology 87, 151–174. 10.1016/0300-483X(94)90159-7 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Maget-Dana R., Ptak M. (1995). Interactions of surfactin with membrane models. Biophys. J. 68, 1937–1943. 10.1016/S0006-3495(95)80370-X [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Malekzadeh E., Alikhani H. A., Savaghebi-Firoozabadi G. R., Zarei M. (2012). Bioremediation of cadmium-contaminated soil through cultivation of maize inoculated with plant growth–promoting rhizobacteria. Bioremediat. J. 16, 204–211. 10.1080/10889868.2012.703258 [Cross Ref]
  • Martin W., Hoffmeister M., Rotte C., Henze K. (2001). An overview of endosymbiotic models for the origins of eukaryotes, their ATP-producing organelles (mitochondria and hydrogenosomes) and their heterotrophic lifestyle. Biol. Chem. 382, 1521–1539. 10.1515/BC.2001.187 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Marulanda A., Barea J. M., Azcon R. (2009). Stimulation of plant growth and drought tolerance by native microorganisms (AM fungi and bacteria) from dry environments. Mechanisms related to bacterial effectiveness. J. Plant Growth Regul. 28, 115–124. 10.1007/s00344-009-9079-6 [Cross Ref]
  • Maurel C., Verdoucq L., Luu D.-T., Santoni V. (2008). Plant aquaporins: membrane channels with multiple integrated functions. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 59, 595–624. 10.1146/annurev.arplant.59.032607.092734 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Miller G., Suzuki N., Ciftci-Yilmaz S., Mittler R. (2010). Reactive oxygen species homeostasis and signalling during drought and salinity stresses. Plant Cell Environ. 33, 453–467. 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2009.02041.x [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Mnif I., Ghribi D. (2015). Potential of bacterial derived biopesticides in pest management. Crop Prot. 77, 52–64. 10.1016/j.cropro.2015.07.017 [Cross Ref]
  • Mohamed H. I., Gomaa E. Z. (2012). Effect of plant growth promoting Bacillus subtilis and Pseudomonas fluorescens on growth and pigment composition of radish plants (Raphanus sativus) under NaCl stress. Photosynthetica 50, 263–272. 10.1007/s11099-012-0032-8 [Cross Ref]
  • Mou Z., Fan W., Dong X. (2003). Inducers of plant systemic acquired resistance regulate NPR1 function through redox changes. Cell. 113:815–826. 10.1016/S0092-8674(03)00429-X [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Munns R., Tester M. (2008). Mechanisms of salinity tolerance. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 59, 651–681. 10.1146/annurev.arplant.59.032607.092911 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Myresiotis C. K., Vryzas Z., Papadopoulou-Mourkidou E. (2015). Effect of specific plant-growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) on growth and uptake of neonicotinoid insecticide thiamethoxam in corn (Zea mays L.) seedlings. Pest Manag. Sci. 71, 1258–1266. 10.1002/ps.3919 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Nadeem S. M., Shaharoona B., Arshad M., Crowley D. E. (2012). Population density and functional diversity of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria associated with avocado trees in saline soils. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. Appl. Soil Ecol. 62, 147–154. 10.1016/j.apsoil.2012.08.005 [Cross Ref]
  • Narasimhan A., Shivakumar S. (2015). Evaluation of Bacillus subtilis (JN032305) biofungicide to control chilli anthracnose in pot controlled conditions. Biocontrol Sci. Technol. 25, 543–559. 10.1080/09583157.2014.996737 [Cross Ref]
  • Narendra-Babu A., Jogaiah S., Ito S. I., Kestur-Nagaraj A., Tran L. S. P. (2015). Improvement of growth, fruit weight and early blight disease protection of tomato plants by rhizosphere bacteria is correlated with their beneficial traits and induced biosynthesis of antioxidant peroxidase and polyphenol oxidase. Plant Sci. 231, 62–73. 10.1016/j.plantsci.2014.11.006 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Nautiyal C. S., Srivastava S., Chauhan P. S., Seem K., Mishra A., Sopory S. K. (2013). Plant growth-promoting bacteria Bacillus amyloliquefaciens NBRISN13 modulates gene expression profile of leaf and rhizosphere community in rice during salt stress. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 66, 1–9. 10.1016/j.plaphy.2013.01.020 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Navon A. (2000). Bacillus thuringiensis insecticides in crop protection - Reality and prospects. Crop Prot. 19, 669–676. 10.1016/S0261-2194(00)00089-2 [Cross Ref]
  • Ngugi H., Dedej S., Delaplane K., Savelle A., Scherm H. (2005). Efect of flower-applied Serenade biofungicide (Bacillus subtilis) on pollination-related variables in rabbit eye blueberry. Biol. Control. 33, 32–38. 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2005.01.002 [Cross Ref]
  • Pandey S., Ghosh P. K., Ghosh S., De T. K., Maiti T. K. (2013). Role of heavy metal resistant Ochrobactrum sp. and Bacillus spp. strains in bioremediation of a rice cultivar and their PGPR like activities. J. Microbiol. 51, 11–17. 10.1007/s12275-013-2330-7 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Paramasiva I., Krishnayya P. V., War A. R., Sharma H. C. (2014). Crop hosts and genotypic resistance influence the biological activity of Bacillus thuringiensis towards Helicoverpa armigera. Crop Prot. 64, 38–46. 10.1016/j.cropro.2014.05.010 [Cross Ref]
  • Porat R., Pasentsis K., Rozentzvieg D., Gerasopoulos D., Falarac V., Samach A., et al. . (2004). Isolation of a dehydrin cDNA from orange and grapefruit citrus fruit that is specifically induced by the combination of heat followed by chilling temperatures. Physiol. Plant. 120, 256–264. 10.1111/j.0031-9317.2004.0242.x [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Porcel R., Aroca R., Ruiz-Lozano J. M. (2012). Salinity stress alleviation using arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. A review. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 32, 181–200. 10.1007/s13593-011-0029-x [Cross Ref]
  • Pourbabaee A. A., Bahmani E., Alikhani H. A., Emami S. (2016). Promotion of wheat growth under salt stress by halotolerant bacteria containing ACC deaminase. J. Agric. Sci. Technol. 18, 855–864.
  • Qurashi A. W., Sabri A. N. (2013). Osmolyte accumulation in moderately halophilic bacteria improves salt tolerance of chickpea. Pakist. J. Bot. 45, 1011–1016.
  • Radhakrishnan R., Kang S. M., Baek I. Y., Lee I. J. (2014). Characterization of plant growth-promoting traits of Penicillium species against the effects of high soil salinity and root disease. J. Plant Interact. 9, 754–762. 10.1080/17429145.2014.930524 [Cross Ref]
  • Radhakrishnan R., Lee I. J. (2013). Regulation of salicylic acid, jasmonic acid and fatty acids in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) by spermidine promotes plant growth against salt stress. Acta Physiol. Plant. 35, 3315–3322. 10.1007/s11738-013-1364-0 [Cross Ref]
  • Radhakrishnan R., Lee I. J. (2014). Effect of low dose of spermidine on physiological changes in salt stressed cucumber plants. Russ. J. Plant Physiol. 61, 90–96. 10.1134/S1021443714010129 [Cross Ref]
  • Radhakrishnan R., Lee I. J. (2016). Gibberellins producing Bacillus methylotrophicus KE2 supports plant growth and enhances nutritional metabolites and food values of lettuce. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 109, 181–189. 10.1016/j.plaphy.2016.09.018 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Radhakrishnan R., Shim K. B., Lee B. W., Hwang C. D., Pae S. B., Park C. H., et al. . (2013). IAA-producing Penicillium sp. NICS01 triggers plant growth and suppresses Fusarium sp.-induced oxidative stress in sesame (Sesamum indicum L.). J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 23, 856–863. 10.4014/jmb.1209.09045 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Rady M. M. (2011). Effect of 24-epibrassinolide on growth, yield, antioxidant system and cadmium content of bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) plants under salinity and cadmium stress. Sci. Horticult. 129:232–237. 10.1016/j.scienta.2011.03.035 [Cross Ref]
  • Rahman A., Uddin W., Wenner N. G. (2015). Induced systemic resistance responses in perennial ryegrass against Magnaporthe oryzae elicited by semi-purified surfactin lipopeptides and live cells of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens. Mol. Plant Pathol. 16, 546–558. 10.1111/mpp.12209 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Riaz S., Faisal M., Hasnain S. (2010). Cicer arietinum growth promotion by Ochrobactrum intermedium and Bacillus cereus in the presence of CrCl3and K2CrO4. Ann. Microbiol. 60, 729–733. 10.1007/s13213-010-0123-3 [Cross Ref]
  • Robinson D. (2001). Root proliferation, nitrate inflow and their carbon costs during nitrogen capture by competing plants in patchy soil. Plant Soil. 232, 41–50. 10.1023/A:1010377818094 [Cross Ref]
  • Sandhya V., Ali S. Z., Grover M., Reddy G., Bandi V. (2011). Drought- tolerant plant growth promoting Bacillus spp.: effect on growth, osmolytes, and antioxidant status of maize under drought stress. J. Plant Interact. 6, 1–14. 10.1080/17429145.2010.535178 [Cross Ref]
  • Sarosh B. R., Danielsson J., Meijer J. (2009). Transcript profiling of oilseed rape (Brassica napus) primed for biocontrol differentiate genes involved in microbial interactions with beneficial Bacillus amyloliquefaciens from pathogenic Botrytis cinerea. Plant Mol. Biol. 70, 31–45. 10.1007/s11103-009-9455-4 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Schoffl F., Prandl R., Reindl A. (1998). Regulation of the heatshock response. Plant Physiol. 117, 1135–1141. 10.1104/pp.117.4.1135 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Shaul-Keinan O., Gadkar V., Ginzberg I., Grunzweig J. M., Chet I., Elad Y., et al. (2002). Hormone concentrations in tobacco roots change during arbuscular mycorrhizal colonization with Glomus intraradices. New Phytol. 154, 501–507.
  • Sofia H. J., Chen G., Hetzler B. G., Reyes-Spindola J. F., Miller N. E. (2001). Radical, SAM, a novel protein superfamily linking unresolved steps in familiar biosynthetic pathways with radical mechanisms: functional characterization using new analysis and information visualization methods. Nucleic Acids Res. 29, 1097–1106. 10.1093/nar/29.5.1097 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Solanki M. K., Robert A. S., Singh R. K., Kumar S., Pandey A. K., Srivastava A. K., et al. . (2012). Characterization of mycolytic enzymes of Bacillus strains and their bio-protection role against Rhizoctonia solani in tomato. Curr. Microbiol. 65, 330–336. 10.1007/s00284-012-0160-1 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Tanaka Y., Matsuoka M., Yamanoto N., Ohashi Y., Kano-Murakami Y., Ozeki Y. (1989). Structure and characterization of a cDNA clone for phenylalanine ammonia-lyase from cut-injured roots of sweet potato. Plant Physiol. 90, 1403–1407. 10.1104/pp.90.4.1403 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Tandy S., Schulin R., Nowack B. (2006). The influence of EDDS on the uptake of heavy metals in hydroponically grown sunflowers. Chemosphere. 62, 1454–1463. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2005.06.005 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Theodorou M. E., Plaxton W. C. (1993). Metabolic adaptations of plant respiration to nutritional phosphate deprivation. Plant Physiol. 101, 339–344. 10.1104/pp.101.2.339 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Timmusk S., Kim S. B., Nevo S. E., Abd El-Daim I. A., Ek B., Bergquist J., et al. . (2015). Sfp-type PPTase inactivation promotes bacterial biofilm formation and ability to enhance wheat drought tolerance. Front. Microbiol. 6:387. 10.3389/fmicb.2015.00387 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Tiwari S., Singh P., Tiwari R., Meena K. K., Yandigeri M., Singh D. P., et al. (2011). Salt-tolerant rhizobacteria-mediated induced tolerance in wheat (Triticum aestivum) and chemical diversity in rhizosphere enhance plant growth. Biol. Fertil. Soils 47, 907–916. 10.1007/s00374-011-0598-5 [Cross Ref]
  • Tonelli M. L., Taurian T., Ibanez F., Angelini J., Fabra A. (2010). Selection and in vitro characterization of biocontrol agents with potential to protect peanut plants against fungal pathogens. J. Plant Pathol. 92, 73–82.
  • Trudgill D. L., Blok V. C. (2001). Apomictic, polyphagous root-knot nematodes: exceptionally successful and damaging biotrophic root pathogens. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 39, 53–77. 10.1146/annurev.phyto.39.1.53 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Vachon V., Laprade R., Schwartz J. L. (2012). Current models of the mode of action of Bacillus thuringiensis insecticidal crystal proteins: a critical review. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 111, 1–12. 10.1016/j.jip.2012.05.001 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Vieira-Pires R. S., Szollosi A., Morais-Cabral J. H. (2013). The structure of the KtrAB potassium transporter. Nature 496, 323–327. 10.1038/nature12055 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Walker E. L., Connolly E. L. (2008). Time to pump iron: iron-deficiency-signaling mechanisms of higher plants. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 11, 530–535. 10.1016/j.pbi.2008.06.013 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Wang C. J., Yang W., Wang C., Gu C., Niu D. D., Liu H. X., et al. . (2012). Induction of drought tolerance in cucumber plants by a consortium of three plant growth-promoting rhizobacterium strains. PLoS ONE 7:e52565. 10.1371/journal.pone.0052565 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Wang H., Xu R., You L., Zhong G. (2013). Characterization of Cu-tolerant bacteria and definition of their role in promotion of growth, Cu accumulation and reduction of Cu toxicity in Triticum aestivum L. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 94, 1–7. 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2013.04.005 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Wang S. (2009). Molecular mechanism of plant growth promotion and induced systemic resistance to tobacco mosaic virus by Bacillus spp. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 19, 1250–1258. 10.4014/jmb.0901.008 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Wang X., Xue Y., Han M., Bu Y., Liu C. (2014). The ecological roles of Bacillus thuringiensis within phyllosphere environments. Chemosphere 108:258–264. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.01.050 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Wani P. A., Khan M. S. (2010). Bacillus species enhance growth parameters of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) in chromium stressed soils. Food Chem. Toxicol. 48, 3262–3267. 10.1016/j.fct.2010.08.035 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Wielkopolan B., Obrepalska-Steplowska A. (2016). Three-way interaction among plants, bacteria, and coleopteran insects. Planta 244, 313–332. 10.1007/s00425-016-2543-1 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Xie D. X., Feys B. F., James S., Nieto-Rostro M., Turner J. G. (1998). Coi1: an Arabidopsis gene required for jasmonate regulated defense and fertility. Science 280, 1091–1094. 10.1126/science.280.5366.1091 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Xie S., Wu H. J., Zang H., Wu L., Zhu Q., Gao X. (2014). Plant growth promotion by spermidine-producing Bacillus subtilis OKB105. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 27, 655–663. 10.1094/MPMI-01-14-0010-R [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Xu M., Sheng J., Chen L., Men Y., Gan L., Guo S., et al. . (2014). Bacterial community compositions of tomato (Lycopersicum esculentum Mill.) seeds and plant growth promoting activity of ACC deaminase producing Bacillus subtilis (HYT-12-1) on tomato seedlings. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 30:835–845. 10.1007/s11274-013-1486-y [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Xu P., Jiang L., Wu J., Li W., Fan S., Zhang S. (2014). Isolation and characterization of a pathogenesis-related protein 10 gene (GmPR10) with induced expression in soybean (Glycine max) during infection with Phytophthora sojae. Mol. Biol. Rep. 41, 4899–4909. 10.1007/s11033-014-3356-6 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Yamamoto S., Shiraishi S., Suzuki S. (2015). Are cyclic lipopeptides produced by Bacillus amyloliquefaciens S13-3 responsible for the plant defence response in strawberry against Colletotrichum gloeosporioides?. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 60, 379–386. 10.1111/lam.12382 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Yang A., Akhtar S. S., Iqbal S., Amjad M., Naveed M., Zahir Z. A., et al. (2016). Enhancing salt tolerance in quinoa by halotolerant bacterial inoculation. Funct. Plant Biol. 43, 632–642. 10.1071/FP15265 [Cross Ref]
  • Yang R., Fan X., Cai X., Hu F. (2015). The inhibitory mechanisms by mixtures of two endophytic bacterial strains isolated from Ginkgo biloba against pepper phytophthora blight. Biol. Control 85, 59–67. 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2014.09.013 [Cross Ref]
  • Yi H. S., Yang J. W., Ryu C. M. (2013). ISR meets SAR outside: additive action of the endophyte Bacillus pumilus INR7 and the chemical inducer, benzothiadiazole, on induced resistance against bacterial spot in field-grown pepper. Front. Plant Sci. 4:122. 10.3389/fpls.2013.00122 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Yu Z., Xiong J., Zhou Q., Luo H., Hu S., Xia L., et al. . (2015). The diverse nematicidal properties and biocontrol efficacy of Bacillus thuringiensis Cry6A against the root-knot nematode Meloidogyne hapla. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 125, 73–80. 10.1016/j.jip.2014.12.011 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Zawadzka A. M., Abergel R. J., Nichiporuk R., Andersen U. N., Raymond K. N. (2009). Siderophore-mediated iron acquisition systems in Bacillus cereus: identification of receptors for anthrax virulenceassociated petrobactin. Biochem. 48, 3645–3657. 10.1021/bi8018674 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Zebelo S., Song Y., Kloepper J. W., Fadamiro H. (2016). Rhizobacteria activates (+)-β-cadinene synthase genes and induces systemic resistance in cotton against beet armyworm (Spodoptera exigua). Plant Cell Environ. 39, 935–943. 10.1111/pce.12704 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Zgallai H., Steppe K., Lemeur R. (2005). Photosynthetic, physiological and biochemical responses of tomato plants to polyethylene glycol-induced water deficit. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 47, 1470–1478. 10.1111/j.1744-7909.2005.00193.x [Cross Ref]
  • Zhang D., Liang W., Yin C., Zong J., Gu F. (2010). OsC6, encoding a lipid transfer protein, is required for postmeiotic anther development in rice. Plant Physiol. 154, 149–162. 10.1104/pp.110.158865 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Zhang S., Reddy M. S., Kloepper J. W. (2004). Tobacco growth enhancement and blue mold disease protection by rhizobacteria: relationship between plant growth promotion and systemic disease protection by PGPR strain 90-166. Plant Soil. 262, 277–288. 10.1023/B [Cross Ref]
  • Zhao L., Feng C., Wu K., Chen W., Chen Y., Hao X., et al. . (2017). Advances and prospects in biogenic substances against plant virus: a review. Pest. Biochem. Physiol. 135, 15–26. 10.1016/j.pestbp.2016.07.003 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Zhu S. Q., Chen M. W., Ji B. H., Jiao D. M., Liang J. S. (2011). Roles of xanthophylls and exogenous ABA in protection against NaCl induced photo-damage in rice (Oryza sativa L) and cabbage (Brassica campestris). J. Exp. Bot. 62, 4617–4625. 10.1093/jxb/err170 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]

Articles from Frontiers in Physiology are provided here courtesy of Frontiers Media SA