PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of vetworldVeterinary World
 
Vet World. 2017 August; 10(8): 973–978.
Published online 2017 August 23. doi:  10.14202/vetworld.2017.973-978
PMCID: PMC5591488

Isolation and characterization of bacteriophages with lytic activity against common bacterial pathogens

Abstract

Aim:

Present investigation was conducted to isolate and characterize bacteriophages with lytic activity against common bacterial pathogens.

Materials and Methods:

A total of 60 samples of animal waste disposal from cattle (42) and buffalo (18) farms were collected from three different strata, i.e., top, mid, and bottom of collection tank. Samples were primarily subjected to rapid detection methods, and then isolation of phage was done by double agar layer method using Bacillus subtilis (BsH) and Escherichia coli (EH) as host system. Phages were characterized on the basis of plaque morphology, temperature, pH susceptibility, and host range.

Results:

Recovery of phages was higher from dairy cattle farm waste (78.57%) as compared to buffalo farm waste (72.22%) and bottom layer of tank showed maximum recovery. Bacillus subtilis (91%) supported the growth of more phages as compared to E. coli (9%). Three different phage morphotypes were observed each against Bacillus subtilis (BsHR1, BsHR2, and BsHR3) and E. coli (EHR1, EHR2, and EHR3). Mean phage titer of above six phage isolates ranged between 3×1010 and 5×1012 plaque forming units/ml. Viability of phages was by, and large unaffected at 70°C within 2-3 min, and phage isolates were completely inactivated below pH 3 and above 11. Coliphage EHR1 had widest host range followed by BsHR1 and BsHR2 while EHR2, EHR3, and BsHR3 had low lytic activity.

Conclusion:

It could be concluded from the present study that the Bacillus and Coli phage has wide host range and thus exhibits the potential to be used as drug substitute tool against common bacterial pathogens.

Keywords: Bacillus subtilis, bacteriophage, Escherichia coli, host range, sewage

Introduction

Bacteriophages are viruses which have the ability to multiply only in bacterial cells, and they are detectable almost everywhere where live bacteria exist [1]. The environment populated by bacterial hosts such as soil, sewage, and animal secretions are unique source of all types of phages, offering the possibility to isolate them for therapeutic purposes [2]. In current scenario, serious medical and social problem results from the increasing antibiotic resistance of bacterial strains [3]. At the same time, pharmaceutical industries are withdrawing from research and development on new antibiotics due to unprofitability of the venture and the risks of development of resistance in bacteria [4], which has generated interest in alternatives over conventional and current system of microbial control. Lytic phages are the possible replacement for antibiotics to treat bacterial infections not responding to conventional antibiotic therapy [5].

The application of phages to control a certain bacterial pathogen is complicated by the high degrees of phenotypic diversity within populations of both phages and bacteria [6]. Consequently, individual strains of a pathogen may be more or less susceptible or even resistant to different co-occurring phages. Before therapeutic application, it is necessary to understand in detail the phage and host interaction, which is affected by both biological and physical factors [7]. The biological aspect is related to bacterial resistance, whereas temperature and pH are the main physical factors affecting the phage adsorption and bacterial growth.

Therefore, the present investigation was conducted to isolate and characterize lytic bacteriophages from the dairy farm waste using Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis as host system and to assess their in vitro susceptibility in common bacterial pathogens isolated from clinical cases.

Materials and Methods

Ethical approval

Ethical approval was not necessary to pursue this research work.

Location of study

The present study was conducted at the Department of Veterinary Microbiology, College of Veterinary Science and Animal Husbandry, Anjora, Durg, Chhattisgarh, India.

Host bacteria

B. subtilis and E. coli obtained from sewage were used as primary hosts for the isolation of phages.

Collection and processing of waste water samples

The samples of animal waste disposal constituting various body excretions of cows (42 nos.) and buffaloes (18 nos.) were collected in sufficient amount from three different strata, i.e. top, mid (15 cm deep from top), and bottom (45 cm deep from top) of collection tank. For this purpose, 30 cm long, sterile disposable pipette, pipette bulb, and conical flasks were used.

Samples were processed as per the method given by Jothikumar et al. [8] with slight modifications. Samples were spun gently in a homogenizer for 3 h continuously and then centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 20 min. The supernatant was collected and recentrifuged at 5000 rpm for 20 min in refrigerated centrifuge (Remi C-24). Then, supernatant was filtered through a 0.45 µm millipore syringe filters, and filtrate was tested for the presence of lytic activity against B. subtilis and E. coli.

Isolation of bacteriophage

Turbidity reduction and streak plate technique were used as preliminary methods for screening of lytic activity of phages. Turbidity reduction method was performed as per protocol of Harrigan and McCance [9] with slight modifications. 1 ml chloroform was added in 5 ml of processed sewage sample, then mixed and centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 20 min. 1 ml supernatant was transferred in 5 ml broth culture of bacteria. Whereas in streak plate method, processed samples were inoculated over surface of bacterial lawn on nutrient agar plates. Next day plates were examined for the presence of plaques or any lytic activity on bacterial lawn. The test was repeated thrice before the sample is adjudged as negative.

On the basis of clear plaque morphology, samples were selected for phage lysate preparation by more sensitive double agar layer (DAL) method as described by Adams [10]. In a sterile vial, 500 µl of filtrate was mixed with 500 µl of 6 h old bacterial culture, and 2.4 g/L MgCl2 solution was added to enhance the adsorption of phage over bacterial surface. Then, it was kept on a shaker in gentle speed for 20 min and then added to test tube containing 2.5 ml of molten soft agar held at 45°C in a water bath. The mixture was swirled, poured onto lactose agar basal plates, allowed to solidify and then incubated at 37°C up to 48 h. Plates were observed at interval of 6, 12, 24, and 48 h for the development of plaques. Phage lysate was purified by two consecutive single plaque isolation cycle and propagated on the corresponding bacterial host strain. Different phage lysates were designated by the laboratory identification number as BsHR for B. subtilis phages and EHR for E. coli phages.

Characterization of phages

Host range determination

Freshly recovered phages were tested against pathogenic bacteria, namely, Staphylococcus aureus, Salmonella spp., Pseudomonas aeruginosa, E. coli, Proteus spp., and Klebsiella spp. isolated from different clinical samples.

Plaque morphology

Morphology of plaque was recorded according to their size, edge, and boundaries [11] and was noted as small (under 2 mm), medium (2 mm), and large (larger than 2 mm)/clear or diffused type plaques.

Effect of temperature and pH

Viability of phage was tested at 70°C temperature when exposed for 1, 2, and 3 min. Phage viability before and after heat treatment was adjudged by DAL method and any reduction in viability of phage was recorded. Similarly, the effect of pH (3-11) was seen on viability of phages in broth.

Titration of phage lysate

Phage lysate was prepared as per protocol of Jothikumar et al. [8] with slight modification. Briefly, phage stock (100 µl) was mixed with 200 µl of respective host bacterial culture (3×107 to 1×108 cfu/ml). Then, 2.4 g/L of MgCl2 was added and kept for 20 min on shaker adjusted at a gentle speed. The suspension was then mixed into 2.5 ml molten soft agar kept at 45°C in water bath and incubated up to 48 h at 37°C. Confluently, lysed plates were selected and the top agar was scrapped with 5 ml of lactose broth. Scrapings were pooled and 2-3 drops of chloroform were added and kept for 10 min and then centrifuged at 5000 rpm for 20 min in a refrigerated centrifuge (Remi C-24). Supernatant was filtered through 0.45 µm Millipore syringe filter and filtrate was used as lysate. Ten-fold serial dilution of the phage lysate in normal saline was prepared and subjected to plaque formation by DAL method. Phage titer was expressed as plaque forming units (PFU/ml) and determined by following formula:

PFU/ml=Number of plaques × Dilution factor

Results

Phages isolates

Recovery of phages was slightly higher in dairy cattle farm waste as compared to buffalo farm waste, and concentration of phage was greater in bottom and middle layer than superficial layer of tank (Table 1). Lytic activity shown by turbidity reduction method was more (76.66%) as compared to streak plate method (55%) and DAL method (55%). Further, comparison of streak plate method with DAL method revealed 100% correlation.

Table-1
Recovery status of lytic phages.

During the present study, a total of 33 phage isolates were obtained. For each prime host, three different phage types were assigned on the basis of plaque morphology. Numbers of phage strains recovered against B. subtilis and E. coli were 30 (91%) and 3 (9%), respectively (Table 2). Three different phage morphotypes each against B. subtilis (BsHR1, BsHR2, and BsHR3) and E. coli (EHR1, EHR2, and EHR3) were reported (Figures-(Figures-11--44).

Table-2
Plaque morphology of phage lysates.
Figure-4
Elevated haloed plaques on bacterial lawn (EHR3).

Characteristics of phages

No significant effect due to pH on viability of phage isolates was recorded. The isolates appear to be stable at the pH range 5-9 but inactivation is evident at the very low (pH 3) and very high pH levels (pH 11). Phage isolates BsHR2 and BsHR3 remain viable at 70°C up to 3 min while BsHR1 showed a definite decrease in the percent survivability at 70°C for 2 min and no viability was seen when exposed for 3 min. However, EHR1, EHR2, and EHR3 isolates remained viable at 70°C up to 2 min with further inactivation when exposed for 3 min. Mean phage titer of lysate ranged from 3×1012 to 5×1012 PFU/ml.

Host range of phage isolates

Lytic activity of phage lysate against other bacteria is illustrated in Table 3. BsHR1 and BsHR2 were lytic against Staphylococcus, Salmonella, and Pseudomonas while BsHR3 was found effective against only two genera, viz., Staphylococcus and Pseudomonas. Among the five genera tested none of the bacteria was found sensitive to EHR3. EHR2 showed lytic activity against Staphylococcus only while EHR1 had wide host range.

Table-3
Host range of phage isolates.

Discussion

Likewise present study, various workers have isolated phages from sewage of livestock farms [12,13]. In accordance with the previous study, rapid screening methods such as turbidity reduction and streak plate methods and subsequent processing by DAL method [12,14,15] were found much helpful during the present investigation. This highlighted the importance of initial screening for successful recovery of phage. Failure of streak plate method to give 100% recovery at par with that of turbidity reduction method may be attributed to less concentration of phages besides other factors, as large volume of sample is required for phage propagation. Those samples which failed to induce lysis of bacteria in turbidity reduction method also did not show plaque formation by streak plate method. Turbidity reduction method can be applied on crude sample and is comparatively convenient to perform and also is less time-consuming. However, the rapid turbidity reduction method alone was not found reliable as it frequently yielded false positive results also. Hence, simultaneous streak plate method that improved the recovery status of phage lysates is recommended. Most of the workers stressed on choice of appropriate host bacterium for optimum recovery of phages. There are several reports that support the use of either B. subtilis and/or E. coli [16,17]. B. subtilis supported the growth of multiple morphotypes of phages as compared to E. coli concluded on the basis of recovery of thirty B. subtilis (BsHR) phage and three E. coli specific phages (EHR). Similarly, Krasowska et al. [18] reported that phage had the highest percent adsorption to the Bacillus host. Due to high activity at the low and high temperature and pH, B. subtilis phage seems to be the best candidate for use in industry. Less recovery of E. coli phages may be correlated with the size of bacterium [13]. E. coli being smaller in size provides less surface area for attachment of bacteriophage as compared to B. subtilis.

Higher recovery status of phages in dairy farm waste as compared to buffalo farm waste is in support with report of Tiwari et al. [12], Shukla and Hirpurkar [13], and Askora et al. [19]. Higher concentration of phage in bottom and a middle layer of tank were also reported by Carey-Smith et al. [20] and Shukla and Hirpurkar [13]. Goyal et al. [21] opined that most of the organic matter settles in the deeper layer, thus providing optimum conditions for multiplication of host bacteria in deeper layer, which in turn, improves host range interaction.

Plaque morphology is one of the foremost criteria for characterization of phages [13]. Variation in the plaque morphology during the present study may correspond to the difference in phage strain, gel strength and addition of cation [12,22]. In contrast, Jothikumar et al. [8] found that plaque morphology was not affected by addition of cations. Pedroso and Martins [23] also did not find any relationship between coliphage family and specific plaque morphology.

Present findings are in accordance with earlier reports of Tiwari et al. [12] and Shukla and Hirpurkar [13] who observed that phage viability was maximal between pH 5 and 9 and all phages were completely inactivated at pH of 3 and 11. Likewise, Ibrahim et al. [24] observed stable lytic activities at pH 6-8. On the contrary, Krasowska et al. [18] reported B. subtilis phages resistant to the acidic (4.0) and alkaline (9.0 and 10.0) pH. Low pH reportedly affects phage aggregation and reduces their abilities to penetrate the host cells [25].

Temperature susceptibility of phages in present findings is in conformity to those reported by Tiwari et al. [12] and Shukla and Hirpurkar [13]. Likewise, Lu et al. [26] have also reported that phages get inactivated at 70°C and above, while our findings are contradictory to those reported by Krasowska et al. [18] who found that phages of Bacillus were resistant to high temperatures (80°C for 1 min). The reduction of burst size at higher temperature is probably the result of the effect of higher temperature on the metabolism of the host because the bacterial growth rate is decreased between 45°C and 51°C. Likewise present study, many other workers have obtained high titer phage lysate [26,27].

Wide host range and phage types reported during present study are in conformity to the reports of Bielke et al. [28] who observed that phage host range is not always genera restricted, so phages could have wide host range. Present observations are in partial conformity with Carey-Smith et al. [20] who had reported narrow range phages restricted to maximum of two bacterial species. During the last decade, a marked increase in the number of identified phages has been observed. More than 200 lytic Staphylococcal phages have been characterized [29]. Present findings are supported by earlier studies also in which phages were recorded against Streptococci [30], E. coli and other enterobacteria [31], Pseudomonas [32], S. aureus [33], and Bacillus [16].

Conclusion

This study isolated and characterized phages from dairy farm waste disposal using E. coli and B. subtilis as the host system. Recovered phage lysate had broad host range displaying their potential to be used as therapeutics in infectious diseases. However, there is need to understand in vivo phage-mediated selection.

Authors’ Contributions

RKS and SDH designed the experiment. Sample collection was done by RKS and VP. Media preparation and laboratory analysis were performed by RKS, CS, and NR under the supervision of SDH. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgments

The authors are very much thankful to the Dean, College of Veterinary Science and A.H., Anjora, Durg (Chhattisgarh) for providing financial support and all necessary facilities for conducting this research work.

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

1. Zhan A, Buchan A, Chen F. Novel N4 bacteriophages prevail in the cold biosphere. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2015;81:5196–5202. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
2. Naghavi N.S, Golgoljam M, Akbari M. Effect of three sewage isolated bacteriophages on the multi drug resistant pathogenic bacteria. J. Biol. Sci. 2013;13:422–426.
3. WHO. Antimicrobial Resistance: Global Report on Surveillance. World Health Organization. 2014. Available from: http://www.who.int/drugresistance/documents/AMR_report_Web_slide_set.pdf?ua=1. Accessed on 09-08-2017.
4. Clarke T. Drug companies snub antibiotics as pipeline threatens to run dry. Nature. 2003:425–225. [PubMed]
5. O’Flynn G, Ross R.P, Fitzgerald G.F, Coffey A. Evaluation of a cocktail of three bacteriophages for biocontrol of Escherichia coli O157: H7. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2004;70:3417–3424. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
6. Holmfeldt K, Middelboe M, Nybroe O, Riemann L. Large variabilities in host strain susceptibility and phage host range govern interactions between lytic marine phages and their Flavobacterium hosts. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2007;73:6730–6739. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
7. Beke G, Stano M, Klucar L. Modelling the interaction between bacteriophages and their bacterial hosts. Math. Biosci. 2016;279:27–32. [PubMed]
8. Jothikumar N, Reddy C.G, Sundaria R.B, Saigopalb D.V.R. Isolation of coliphages specific to enterotoxigenic E. coli(ETEC) J. Environ. Monit. 2000;2:372–374. [PubMed]
9. Harrigan W.F, McCance M.E. Laboratory Methods in Food Dairy Microbiology. London, U.K: Academic Press, Harcourt Brace and Company Publishers; 1993. pp. 52–57.
10. Adams M.H. Discovery of bacteriophages and methods of study of bacterial viruses. Bacteriophages. Vol. 42. New York: Interscience Publication; 1959. pp. 447–448.
11. Ellis C.B, Winters A.L. Isolation of potential MS2 bacteriophage strains. Biol. Sci. 1969;85:336–345.
12. Tiwari R, Hirpurkar S.D, Shakya S. Isolation and characterization of lytic phage from natural waste material of livestock. Indian Vet. J. 2010;87:644–646.
13. Shukla S, Hirpurkar S.D. Recovery status of bacteriophages of different livestock farms of Veterinary College, Adhartal, Jabalpur, India. Vet. World. 2011;4(3):117–119.
14. Verma H, Pramod D, Abbas M, Prajapati A, Ramchandra D, Rawat M. Isolation and partial characterization of lytic phage against Salmonella abortusequi. Vet. World. 2013;6(2):72–75.
15. Mattila S, Ruotsalainen P, Jalasvuori M. On-demand isolation of bacteriophages against drug-resistant bacteria for personalized phage therapy. Front. Microbiol. 2015;6:1271. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
16. Yuan Y, Gao M, Wu D, Liu P, Wu Y. Genome characteristics of a novel phage from Bacillus thuringiensis showing high similarity with phage from Bacillus cereus. PLoS One. 2012;7(5):375–557. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
17. Gillis A, Mahillon J. Phages preying on Bacillus anthracisBacillus cereus and Bacillus thuringiensis: Past, present and future. Viruses, 6. 2014:2623–2672. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
18. Krasowska A, Biegalska A, Augustyniak D, Los M, Richert M, Lukaszewicz M. Isolation and characterization of phages infecting Bacillus subtilis. Biomed. Res. Int. 2015;2015 Article ID:179597, 10. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
19. Askora A, Merwad A, Gharibe R.M, Maysa A.I.A. A lytic bacteriophage as a biocontrol for some enter pathogenic and enter hemorrhagic Escherichia coli strains of zoonotic risk in Egypt. Revue Méd. Vét. 2015;166(34):76–83.
20. Carey-Smith G.V, Billington C, Cornelius A.J, Hudson J.A, Heinemonn J.A. Isolation and characterization bacteriophages and infecting Salmonella spp. FEMS Microb. Lett. 2006;258:182–186. [PubMed]
21. Goyal S.M, Gerba C.P, Bitton G. In: Phage Ecology. New York: John Wiley and Sons; 1987. p. 321.
22. Ghasemian A, Bavand M, Moradpour Z. A broad-host range coliphage against a clinically isolated E. coli O157: Isolation and characterization. J. Appl. Pharm. Sci. 2017;7(3):123–128.
23. Pedroso D.M.M, Martins M.T. Ultra-morphology of coliphages isolated from water. Water Res. 1995;29:1199–1202.
24. Ibrahim W.N.W, Aznan A.S, Saari N.A, Leong L.K, Musa N, Razzak L.A, Danish-Daniel M, Zainathan S.C, Din M.S.M, Ghaffar M.A, Musa N. In-vitro characterization of lytic bacteriophage PhVh6 as potential biocontrol agent against pathogenic Vibrio harveyi. AACL Bioflux. 2017;10(1):64–76.
25. Langlet J, Gaboriaud F, Gantzer C. Effects of pH on plaque forming unit counts and aggregation of MS2 bacteriophage. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2007;103:1632–1638. [PubMed]
26. Lu Z, Breidt F, Fleming H.P, Altermann E, Klaenhammer T.R. Isolation and characterization of a Lactobacillus plantarum bacteriophage phiJL-1, from a cucumber fermentation. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2003;84:225–235. [PubMed]
27. McLaughlin M.R, Balaa M.F, Sims J, King R. Isolation of Salmonella Bacteriophages from swine effluent lagoons. J. Environ. Qual. 2006;35:522–528. [PubMed]
28. Bielke H, Donoghue S, Donoghue A, Hargis D.B.M. Salmonella Host range of bacteriophges that infect multiple genera. Poult. Sci. 2007;86:2536–2540. [PubMed]
29. Ackermann H.W. Phages examined in the electron microscope. Arch. Virol. 2007;152:227–243. [PubMed]
30. Ahmed K, Kaderbhai N.N, Kaderbhai M.A. Bacteriophage therapy revisited. Afr. J. Microbiol. Res. 2012;6(14):3366–3379.
31. Marwa B.S, Abdulamir A.S. In vitro study on using bacteriophages in the treatment of pathogenic Escherichia coli in Iraq. Iraqi J. Med. Sci. 2014;12(2):128–132.
32. Morello E, Emilie S, Damien M, Michel H, Laurent T, Lhousseine D. Pulmonary bacteriophage therapy on Pseudomonas aeruginosa cystic fibrosis strains first steps towards treatment and prevention. PLoS One. 2011;10:13–71. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
33. Garcia P, Madera C, Martinez B, Rodriguez A, Suarez J.E. Prevalence of bacteriophages infecting Staphylococcus aureus in dairy samples and their potential as biocontrol agents. J. Dairy Sci. 2009;92:3019–3026. [PubMed]

Articles from Veterinary World are provided here courtesy of Veterinary World