Search tips
Search criteria 


Logo of medicinesLink to Publisher's site
Medicines (Basel). 2017 June; 4(2): 35.
Published online 2017 June 2. doi:  10.3390/medicines4020035
PMCID: PMC5590071

Enrichment of Animal Diets with Essential Oils—A Great Perspective on Improving Animal Performance and Quality Characteristics of the Derived Products

João Rocha, Academic Editor


Food industry operates in a competitive market and is continually facing challenges to retain or even increase its market share. Consistent high-quality animal products are required to maintain consumer confidence and consumption. Enrichment of foods with bioactive compounds such as the essential oils appears to improve quality characteristics of the derived products and protects consumers against oxidation and bacterial spoilage effects. Synthetic additives are nowadays questioned due to their suspected carcinogenic potential, and therefore extensive research has been undertaken to identify safe and efficient alternatives. Aromatic plants and their respective essential oils belong to natural products and are generally used in pig, poultry, rabbit and ruminant nutrition. The inclusion of essential oils in livestock diets is nowadays becoming a common practice, since dietary supplementation has been proven a simple and convenient strategy to effectively inhibit the oxidative reactions or microbial spoilage at their localized sites. A wide range of essential oils contain bioactive compounds that have the potential to act as multifunctional feed supplements for animals including effects on growth performance, digestive system, pathogenic bacterial growth and lipid oxidation. However, further studies are needed to clarify their exact action and establish their regular use in animal production.

Keywords: essential oils, growth performance, animal products, microbial spoilage, oxidation

1. Introduction

The growing public concern over the potential health risks and environmental impacts caused by the excessive use of antibiotics as growth promoters in animal production has led to a ban of their dietary application within the European Union since 2006 with the intention to minimize the transmission and the proliferation of resistant bacteria via the food chain. However, industries involved in the animal production chain, including the primary producers, processors, distributors, and retailers are constantly searching for efficacious, safe and cost effective substances with similar properties. As a result, natural feed supplements derived from plants such as the essential oils (EOs) have been examined as alternatives in animal production for improving growing performance parameters and the quality characteristics of the derived products (meat, milk and eggs) [1].

EOs are quite complex mixtures constituted by several components, hence resistance is less likely to become a problem compared to a single synthetic compound. They mainly consist of terpenoids and a variety of low molecular weight aliphatic hydrocarbons (phenols, aromatic aldehydes, etc.) [2]. EOs have the potential of a possible therapeutic exploitation in a variety of conditions in animal production: they enhance production of digestive secretions, stimulate blood circulation, exert antioxidant properties, reduce levels of pathogenic bacteria counts, mitigate the levels of fermentation products (ammonia and biogenic amines), enhance precaecal nutrient digestion, improve the intestinal availability of essential nutrients for absorption and relieve animal from immune defense stress (less activity of the gut-associated lymphatic system) [3,4,5]. However, the mechanisms underlying these functions have not yet been thoroughly elucidated.

Factors such as geographical location, harvesting period, plant part used (seeds, leaf, root or bark) and method of isolation (cold expression, steam distillation, extraction with non-aqueous solvents, etc.) modify the chemical composition of the essential oil derived from the respective plant and may introduce substantial compositional differences between preparations from the same plant species. Source of variability is also the type and origin of the EO, the level of EO that is included in the animal diet, the composition and the digestibility of the basal diet, the level of feed intake and hygiene and environmental conditions [4,6].

2. Classification, Structure and Metabolism of EOs

Essential oils are volatile secondary metabolite fractions mainly extracted by steam distillation (but also cold pressing, fermentation and enfleurage) that have been extensively used in the cosmetic but also in the food industry. The most important active compounds of EOs are categorized into two chemical groups: (mono- and sesqui-)terpenoids and phenylpropanoids that originate from different precursors of the primary metabolism and are further synthesized through separate metabolic pathways. Terpenoids (limonene, thymol, carvacrol, linalool, etc.) are characterized as deriving from an isoprene unit, namely a basic structure of five carbons (C5H8) through the mevalonate pathway [7]. On the other hand, phenylpropanoids (cinnamaldehyde, eugenol, anethole, etc.) derive mainly from the phenylalanine that is synthetized by the shikimate metabolic pathway and are compounds with a chain of three carbons bound to an aromatic ring of six carbons [8].

3. Antimicrobial Effects of EOs

Control of animal products spoilage and pathogenic bacteria has been mainly achieved by the use of synthetic chemical agents in previous decades. The applications of these compounds are nowadays limited due to questions regarding their potent undesirable aspects such as carcinogenicity, acute toxicity, teratogenicity and slow degradation periods. Public awareness has therefore generated interest in the use of more naturally occurring compounds with a broad spectrum of antimicrobial properties that improve the quality characteristics and shelf life of animal products [9]. Essential oils belong to the category of natural antimicrobials and have already been extensively studied for their antimicrobial activities in food systems [2,10,11]. Specific circumstances in food systems such as lipid content, proteins, water activity, pH and enzymes can potentially diminish the efficacy of EOs [10].

EOs and their components are hydrophobic, a characteristic that enables them to partition lipids in the bacterial cell wall and mitochondria, leading to their accumulation in the lipidic layer and a disruption of the membrane integrity and ion transport processes, and resulting in disturbances of the cell osmotic pressure. In detail, a rapid dissipation of H+ and K+ ion gradients (proton motive sources) and depletion of the intracellular ATP pool is observed through the reduction of ATP synthesis and the increased hydrolysis. As a result, the trans-membrane electric potential in bacterial cell is reduced and the proton permeability of the membrane is increased slowing down bacterial growth. When the bacterial tolerance threshold is passed, the extensive loss of cell contents or critical molecules and ions leads to cell death [10]. Moreover, the existence of the hydroxyl group attached to a phenyl ring and its ability to release its proton are considered as crucial factors in disrupting normal ion transport across the cytoplasmic membrane and in inactivating microbial enzymes [10,12].

The above mechanisms of action are more effective against gram-positive bacteria because the hydrophobic compounds of EOs can directly interact with the cell membrane. On the other hand, the external cell wall of gram-negative bacteria is hydrophillic and as a result the hydrophobic (or lipophillic) compounds of EOs cannot easily penetrate into the bacterial membrane [10,13]. However, low molecular weight molecules of EOs can cross the bacterial cell wall by diffusion through membrane proteins or through the layer of lipopolysaccharides resulting in the disruption of membrane integrity [2].

Post mortem application of EOs in food systems contributes to the extension of shelf life by limiting the spoilage of foodborne pathogens [11]. However, during the last decade, dietary supplementation with EOs is constantly gaining ground since it is a simple and convenient way of introducing natural antimicrobials that enter the circulatory system, and are further distributed and retained in tissues. For example, dietary supplementation with the EOs derived from Oregano sp. could be used for improving the microbial hygiene of turkey breast fillets [14] or that of whole carcasses by reducing the microbial load of total viable bacteria and of specific pathogens as shown in broilers [15] and rabbits [16].

3.1. Effects of EOs on the Digestive System and the Gut Microbiota of Swine and Poultry

The effects of EOs dietary supplementation on gut microflora, morphology, enzyme activity and growth performance parameters have been already extensively examined (Table 1). In general, EOs appear to suppress harmful microorganisms, stimulate beneficial microbes such as Lactobacillus spp., regulate the activity of enzymes and protect gut villi, however without inducing significant positive effects on body weight gain. On the other hand, feed conversion ratio is generally improved. Lactobacilli are a group of bacteria that have long been known for their ability to activate the intestinal immune system and increase the resistance to diseases, in part through the release of low-molecular weight peptides which induce immune activation [17]. At the same time, the increased Lactobacilli counts contribute to the colonization resistance against pathogenic microbes by modifying the receptors used by them [18,19]. As shown by the literature, EOs display antimicrobial action against Escherichia coli [20], Clostridium perfringens [21] and Eimeria tenella [22] and prevent their adhesion, colonization and proliferation in the gut of broilers. The decreased numbers of pathogenic bacteria in the gut and the maintenance of a proper bacterial balance between the number of beneficial and harmful bacteria in the intestine appear to improve the ability of epithelial cells to regenerate villus and thus enhance intestinal absorptive capacity [23].

Table 1
Effects of essential oils or their components on gut microflora, morphology, enzyme activity and growth performance parameters in monogastric animals.

The gut is a pivotal organ system that mediates nutrient uptake and use by the animals. As presented in Table 1, essential oils beneficially affect the ecosystem of gastrointestinal microflora by controlling potential pathogens, alleviating the oxidative stress caused by them and stabilizing gut microbiota. Improved intestinal health further enhances availability of essential nutrients for absorption (increased villus length and gut surface) and animal growth performance parameters could therefore be improved [3,5,24]. Moreover, digestive secretions (saliva, bile, mucus, etc.) and enzyme (trypsin, amylase, lipase, etc.) activity are enhanced partially through the irritation of the epithelial tissues and the reduction in the depth of the crypts in the ileum, resulting in an increased gastric retention time of the ingested feed and a better nutrient absorption [25,26].

The exact reasons for the discrepancies shown in Table 1 are speculative but they could be attributed to different type and levels of essential oil, the variability in the concentration of the major bioactive compounds among the different parts (barks, leaves, flowers, etc.) of the plant used, the period of supplementation and the animal species. Moreover, the variability in the efficacy of essential oil on performance of farm animals could also be a result, among others, of the basal diet composition, feed intake level, hygienic standards and environmental conditions [4].

3.2. Effects of EOs on Rumen Fermentation

Ruminal microbial activity plays an important role in the synthesis of high-quality protein for ruminants. However, microbial fermentation could lead to significant energy and protein losses as methane and ammonia that are significant environmental pollutants. Essential oils could be used to manipulate ruminal metabolism and selectively inhibit rumen methanogenesis due to their antimicrobial properties. Methane (CH4) is a potent greenhouse gas with a global warming potential 21 times that of carbon dioxide (CO2) [93]. At the same time, enteric methane losses represent 2–12% of gross energy intake in ruminants depending on diet composition and feed intake [94]. It can be therefore concluded that the reduction of CH4 emissions through the application of EOs is beneficial both for the animals (improved feed efficiency and productivity) and for the environment (mitigation of greenhouse effects) [95]. Essential oils could also positively influence protein metabolism and reduce rumen ammonia levels and lead to a more efficient utilization of dietary nitrogen by inhibiting deamination, i.e., the breakdown of amino acids to NH3, possibly through the selective limitation of the activity of a specific group of bacteria within the rumen, the “hyper-ammonia-producing bacteria” (Prevotella spp., Ruminobacter amylophilus, etc.) at the level of attachment and colonization [96,97].

Several EOs (thyme, oregano, cinnamon, garlic, etc.) have already been used with the intention to reduce CH4 production. At low doses, ruminal fermentation is not affected by essential oils, whereas at high doses these compounds inhibit the target microbial species as well as most rumen microbes [98]. As it has been demonstrated in in vitro studies, although the effects of EOs are diet (forage:concentrate ratio), pH (more intense action at low pH values) and time (adaptation period) dependent, mitigation of methane emissions occurs at high doses (>300 mg/L of culture fluid) and is frequently associated with a decrease in total volatile fatty acids concentration and feed digestion. As a result, although EOs in high doses could exert positive in vitro effects on rumen fermentation, these doses result in negative implications on feed palatability, digestion and animal productivity when applied in vivo. At the same time, the levels of EOs that have elicited favorable fermentation responses in vitro are far too high for in vivo application due to their possible toxic effects and high cost [99]. As shown in Table 2, no effects on feed intake, average daily gain and total volatile fatty acids concentrations and rates (i.e., acetate to propionate ratio) are generally observed after the dietary supplementation of ruminants with EOs or their main components as single compounds or mixtures. Since no significant differences in feed intake and rumen characteristics are found, it can be concluded that generally no effects on rumen methanogenesis are induced. A possible explanation is the ability of rumen microbes to adapt and degrade EOs components [95].

Table 2
Effects of essential oils or their components on rumen characteristics and performance parameters.

4. Antioxidant Effects of EOs

Oxidation of lipids and free radicals’ production are natural processes that destroy the membrane structure, disturb transport processes and cause losses in the function of the cell organelles. Lipids and especially phospholipids present in cell membranes are particularly susceptible to oxidative damage that is positively correlated with the degree of unsaturation of the fatty acids. Polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) are responsible for the maintenance of physiologically important cell membrane properties including fluidity and permeability. The peroxy radicals react with PUFAs and form hydroperoxides (ROOH), which later decompose to produce the volatile non-radical aromatic compounds (aldehydes, alkanes, conjugated dienes, etc.) that adversely affect lipids, pigments, proteins, carbohydrates vitamins and the overall quality of animal products by causing loss of nutritive value and limiting shelf-life [124].

Although synthetic antioxidants (butylated hydroxyanisole (BHA), butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT), tert-butylhydroquinone (TBHQ), gallates, etc.) are traditionally used with the intention to delay, retard or prevent the negative effects of lipid peroxidation by scavenging chain-carrying peroxyl radicals or diminishing the formation of initiating lipid radicals, the demand for natural antioxidants has recently been increased. During the last decades interest in employing antioxidants from natural sources to increase the shelf life of foods is considerably enhanced due to consumer preference for natural occurring ingredients and concerns about the possible toxic effects of synthetic antioxidants.

Animal diet plays a crucial role in the inhibition of free radicals production in the organism and the derived products. The nutritional prevention of oxidizing stress and its implications suggests the optimization of the antioxidant levels in the feed. As illustrated in Table 3, quality of animal products is generally improved after the incorporation of oregano or rosemary EO into the diets of animals. EOs are rich sources of natural antioxidants, such as the phenolic compounds and due their high redox properties and chemical structure have the ability to neutralize free radicals, chelate transitional metals and quench singlet and triplet oxygen by delocalization or decomposition of peroxides [125,126]. As a result, they affect lipid metabolism in animal tissues by exerting beneficial effects on the antioxidative enzymes activity (superoxide dismutase, catalase and glutathione peroxidase) and by preventing the production of reactive oxygen species and off-flavors deriving from the oxidation of polyunsaturated fatty acids [127]. However, depending on type and dosage, EOs can act as prooxidants by disrupting the integrity of cell membrane and organelles, with further cytotoxic effects on living cells [128]. Dietary supplementation with EOs is therefore a simple and convenient strategy to uniformly introduce natural antioxidants into phospholipid membranes, where they may effectively inhibit the oxidative reactions by preventing the formation of radicals, by scavenging them, or by promoting their decomposition at their localized sites and appears as a more effective way of retarding lipid oxidation of animal products compared to post mortem addition [129,130].

Table 3
Dietary supplementation of animal diets with the two most common essential oils derived from the Greek flora (oregano and rosemary) and effects on the quality of the derived products.

5. Conclusions

The increasing pressure on the livestock industry to stop the use of antibiotics as growth promoters has initiated new research to find safe and efficient alternatives. The wide range of bioactive compounds included in the essential oils could boost their use as multifunctional feed supplements for animals. EOs contain several components that have the potential to positively manipulate gut microbiota and rumen fermentation, inhibit pathogenic bacterial growth, prevent tissue oxidation and, as a result, improve growth performance and products’ quality of livestock. However, their effectiveness in animal production has not yet been proven to be consistent and conclusive and some issues need to be addressed before their commercial application. For example, an optimal dose of essential oils application, depending on their type, should be addressed, since their use at high concentrations could induce cytotoxic effects on living cells. Although EOs are generally recognized as safe (GRAS) for use in the food and feed industry and the accumulation of their components in the body is unlikely due to their rapid elimination (glucuronides by the kidneys) or exhalation (carbon dioxide), no analytical methods suitable for their identification and quantification (traceability, toxicity, possible residues, etc.) have yet been developed. At the same time, the beneficial effects of EOs dietary supplementation should be such as to justify the additional cost of their application. Finally, despite the fact that the understanding of EOs mode of action is a prerequisite for their regular application in animal production, our knowledge regarding their activities in animal (as well as in human) organism is still rather limited and there is a strong need for information regarding their absorption, distribution, metabolism and excretion. A further clarification of the above inquiries would therefore be beneficial for establishing EOs regular application in animal production.

Conflicts of Interest

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.


1. Simitzis P.E., Deligeorgis S.G. Animal Feed: Types, Nutrition, Safety. Nova Science Publishers, Inc.; New York, NY, USA: 2011. The effects of natural antioxidants dietary supplementation on the properties of farm animal products; pp. 155–168.
2. Dorman H.J.D., Deans S.G. Antimicrobial agents from plants: Antibacterial activity of plant volatile oils. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2000;88:308–316. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2672.2000.00969.x. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
3. Windisch W., Schedle K., Plitzner C., Kroismayr A. Use of phytogenic products as feed additives for swine and poultry. J. Anim. Sci. 2008;86(Suppl. 14):E140–E148. doi: 10.2527/jas.2007-0459. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
4. Brenes A., Roura E. Essential oils in poultry nutrition: Main effects and modes of action. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2010;158:1–14. doi: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2010.03.007. [Cross Ref]
5. Zeng Z., Zhang S., Wang H., Piao X. Essential oil and aromatic plants as feed additives in non-ruminant nutrition: A review. J. Anim. Sci. Biotechnol. 2015;6:7. doi: 10.1186/s40104-015-0004-5. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
6. Dudareva N., Pichersky E., Gershenzon J. Biochemistry of plant volatiles. Plant Physiol. 2004;135:1893–1902. doi: 10.1104/pp.104.049981. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
7. Zwenger S., Basu C. Plant terpenoids: Applications and future potentials. Biotechnol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2008;3:1–7.
8. De Cássia da Silveira e Sá R., Andrade L.N., Dos Reis Barreto de Oliveira R., De Sousa D.P. A review on anti-inflammatory activity of phenylpropanoids found in essential oils. Molecules. 2014;19:1459–1480. doi: 10.3390/molecules19021459. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
9. Faleiro M.L. The mode of antibacterial action of essential oils. In: Mendez-Vilas A., editor. Science Against Microbial Pathogens: Communicating Current Research and Technological Advances 2. Formatex; Badajoz, Spain: 2011. pp. 1143–1156.
10. Burt S. Essential oils: Their antibacterial properties and potential applications in foods—A review. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2004;94:223–253. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2004.03.022. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
11. Calo J.R., Crandall P.G., O’Bryan C.A., Ricke S.C. Essential oils as antimicrobials in food systems—A review. Food Control. 2015;54:111–119. doi: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2014.12.040. [Cross Ref]
12. Ultee A., Bennik M.H.J., Moezelaar R. The phenolic hydroxyl group of carvacrol is essential for action against the food-borne pathogen Bacillus cereus. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2002;68:1561–1568. doi: 10.1128/AEM.68.4.1561-1568.2002. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
13. Cimanga K., Kambu K., Tona L., Apers S., De Bruyne T., Hermans N., Vlietinck A.J. Correlation between chemical composition and antibacterial activity of essential oils of some aromatic medicinal plants growing in the Democratic Republic of Congo. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2002;79:213–220. doi: 10.1016/S0378-8741(01)00384-1. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
14. Govaris A., Botsoglou E., Florou-Paneri P., Moulas A., Papageorgiou G. Dietary supplementation of oregano essential oil and a-tocopheryl acetate on microbial growth and lipid oxidation of turkey breast fillets during storage. Int. J. Poult. Sci. 2005;4:969–975.
15. Aksit M., Goksoy E., Kok F., Ozdemir D., Ozdogan M. The impacts of organic acid and essential oil supplementations to diets on the microbiological quality of chicken carcasses. Arch. Geflugelkd. 2006;70:168–173.
16. Soultos N., Tzikas Z., Christaki E., Papageorgiou K., Steris V. The effect of dietary oregano essential oil on microbial growth of rabbit carcasses during refrigerated storage. Meat Sci. 2009;81:474–478. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2008.10.001. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
17. Muir W.I., Bryden W.L., Husband A.J. Immunity, vaccination and the avian intestinal tract. Dev. Comp. Immunol. 2000;24:325–342. doi: 10.1016/S0145-305X(99)00081-6. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
18. Adil S., Magray S.N. Impact and manipulation of gut microflora in poultry: A review. J. Anim. Vet. Adv. 2012;11:873–877. doi: 10.3923/javaa.2012.873.877. [Cross Ref]
19. Rinttila T., Apajalahti J. Intestinal microbiota and metabolites—Implications for broiler chicken health and performance. J. Appl. Poult. Res. 2013;22:647–658. doi: 10.3382/japr.2013-00742. [Cross Ref]
20. Jang I.S., Ko Y.H., Kang S.Y., Lee C.Y. Effect of a commercial essential oil on growth performance, digestive enzyme activity and intestinal microflora population in broiler chickens. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2007;134:304–315. doi: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2006.06.009. [Cross Ref]
21. Jamroz D., Wertelecki T., Houszka M., Kamel C. Influence of diet type on the inclusion of plant origin active substances on morphological and histochemical characteristics of the stomach and jejunum walls in chicken. J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr. 2006;90:255–268. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0396.2005.00603.x. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
22. Giannenas I.A., Florou-Paneri P., Papazahariadou M., Botsoglou N.A., Christaki E., Spais A.B. Effect of diet supplementation with ground oregano on performance of broiler chickens challenged with Eimeria tenella. Arch. Geflugelkd. 2004;68:247–252.
23. Mourão J.L., Pinheiro V., Alves A., Guedes C.M., Pinto L., Saavedra M.J., Spring P., Kocher A. Effect of mannan oligosaccharides on the performance, intestinal morphology and caecal fermentation of fattening rabbits. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2006;126:107–120. doi: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2005.06.009. [Cross Ref]
24. Franz C., Baser K.H.C., Windisch W. Essential oils and aromatic plants in animal feeding—A European perspective. A review. Flavour Fragr. J. 2010;25:327–340. doi: 10.1002/ffj.1967. [Cross Ref]
25. Platel K., Srinivasan K. Digestive stimulant action of spices: A myth or reality? Indian J. Med. Res. 2004;119:167–179. [PubMed]
26. Jamroz D., Wiliczkiewicz A., Wertelecki T., Orda J., Skorupińska J. Use of active substances of plant origin in chicken diets based on maize and locally grown cereals. Br. Poult. Sci. 2005;46:485–493. doi: 10.1080/00071660500191056. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
27. Allen P.C., Lydon J., Danforth H.D. Effects of components of Artemisia annua on coccidia infections in chickens. Poult. Sci. 1997;76:1156–1163. doi: 10.1093/ps/76.8.1156. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
28. Abildgaard L., Hojberg O., Schramm A., Balle K.M., Engberg R.M. The effect of feeding a commercial essential oil product on Clostridium perfringens numbers in the intestine of broiler chickens measured by real-time PCR targeting the α-toxin-encoding gene (plc) Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2010;157:181–189. doi: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2010.03.010. [Cross Ref]
29. Abudabos A.M., Alyemni A.H. Effects of the essential oil blend CRINA® Poultry in feed on broiler performance and gut microbiology. Ital. J. Anim. Sci. 2013;12:e83. doi: 10.4081/ijas.2013.e83. [Cross Ref]
30. Abudabos A.M., Alyemni A.H. The effect of feeding a commercial essential oil product to broilers challenged with Clostridium perfringens. Afr. J. Microbiol. Res. 2013;7:4539–4545. doi: 10.5897/AJMR2013.6074. [Cross Ref]
31. Alali W.Q., Hofacre C.L., Mathis G.F., Faltys G. Effect of essential oil compound on shedding and colonization of Salmonella enterica serovar Heidelberg in broilers. Poult. Sci. 2013;92:836–841. doi: 10.3382/ps.2012-02783. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
32. Amerah A.M., Péron A., Zaefarian F., Ravindran V. Influence of whole wheat inclusion and a blend of essential oils on the performance, nutrient utilisation, digestive tract development and ileal microbiota profile of broiler chickens. Br. Poult. Sci. 2011;52:124–132. doi: 10.1080/00071668.2010.548791. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
33. Amerah A.M., Mathis G., Hofacre C.L. Effect of xylanase and a blend of essential oils on performance and Salmonella colonization of broiler chickens challenged with Salmonella Heidelberg. Poult. Sci. 2012;91:943–947. doi: 10.3382/ps.2011-01922. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
34. Arczewska-Wlosek A., Swiatkiewicz S. The effect of a dietary herbal extract blend on the performance of broilers challenged with Eimeria oocysts. J. Anim. Feed Sci. 2012;21:133–142. doi: 10.22358/jafs/66058/2012. [Cross Ref]
35. Bozkurt M., Selek N., Küçükyilmaz K., Eren H., Güven E., Çatli A.U., Çinar M. Effects of dietary supplementation with a herbal extract on the performance of broilers infected with a mixture of Eimeria species. Br. Poult. Sci. 2012;53:325–332. doi: 10.1080/00071668.2012.699673. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
36. Cho J.H., Kim H.J., Kim I.H. Effects of phytogenic feed additive on growth performance, digestibility, blood metabolites, intestinal microbiota, meat color and relative organ weight after oral challenge with Clostridium perfringens in broilers. Livest. Sci. 2014;160:82–88. doi: 10.1016/j.livsci.2013.11.006. [Cross Ref]
37. Christaki E., Florou-Paneri P., Giannenas I., Papazahariadou M., Botsoglou N.A., Spais A.B. Effect of a mixture of herbal extracts on broiler chickens infected with Eimeria tenella. Anim. Res. 2004;53:137–144. doi: 10.1051/animres:2004006. [Cross Ref]
38. Hong J.C., Steiner T., Aufy A., Lien T.F. Effects of supplemental essential oil on growth performance, lipid metabolites and immunity, intestinal characteristics, microbiota and carcass traits in broilers. Livest. Sci. 2012;144:253–262. doi: 10.1016/j.livsci.2011.12.008. [Cross Ref]
39. Isabel B., Santos Y. Effects of dietary organic acids and essential oils on growth performance and carcass characteristics of broiler chickens. J. Appl. Poult. Res. 2009;18:472–476. doi: 10.3382/japr.2008-00096. [Cross Ref]
40. Jamroz D., Orda J., Kamel C., Wiliczkiewicz A., Wertelecki T., Skorupinska J. The influence of phytogenic extracts on performance, nutrient digestibility, carcass characteristics, and gut microbial status in broiler chickens. J. Anim. Feed Sci. 2003;12:583–596. doi: 10.22358/jafs/67752/2003. [Cross Ref]
41. Khattak F., Ronchi A., Castelli P., Sparks N. Effects of natural blend of essential oil on growth performance, blood biochemistry, caecal morphology, and carcass quality of broiler chickens. Poult. Sci. 2014;93:132–137. doi: 10.3382/ps.2013-03387. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
42. Küçükyilmaz K., Bozkurt M., Selek N., Güven E., Eren H., Atasever A., Bintaş E., Çatlı A.U., Çınar M. Effects of vaccination against coccidiosis, with and without a specific herbal essential oil blend, on performance, oocyst excretion and serum IBD titers of broilers reared on litter. Ital. J. Anim. Sci. 2012;11:e1. doi: 10.4081/ijas.2012.e1. [Cross Ref]
43. Mitsch P., Zitterl-Eglseer K., Köhler B., Gabler C., Losa R., Zimpernik I. The effect of two different blends of essential oil components on the proliferation of Clostridium perfringens in the intestines of broiler chickens. Poult. Sci. 2004;83:669–675. doi: 10.1093/ps/83.4.669. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
44. Oviedo-Rondón E.O., Hume M.E., Hernandez C., Clemente-Hernández S. Intestinal microbial ecology of broilers vaccinated and challenged with mixed Eimeria species, and supplemented with essential oil blends. Poult. Sci. 2006;85:854–860. doi: 10.1093/ps/85.5.854. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
45. Oviedo-Rondón E.O., Clemente-Hernández S., Salvador F., Williams P., Losa R., Stephan F. Essential oils on mixed coccidia vaccination and infection in broilers. Int. J. Poult. Sci. 2006;5:723–730.
46. Oviedo-Rondón E.O., Hume M.E., Barbosa N.A., Sakomura N.K., Weber G., Wilson J.W. Ileal and caecal microbial populations in broilers given specific essential oil blends and probiotics in two consecutive grow-outs. Avian Biol. Res. 2010;3:157–169. doi: 10.3184/175815511X12919853724050. [Cross Ref]
47. Tiihonen K., Kettunen H., Bento M.H.L., Saarinen M., Lahtinen S., Ouwehand A.C., Schulze H., Rautonen N. The effect of feeding essential oils on broiler performance and gut microbiota. Br. Poult. Sci. 2010;51:381–392. doi: 10.1080/00071668.2010.496446. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
48. Orndorff B.W., Novak C.L., Pierson F.W., Caldwell D.J., McElroy A.P. Comparison of prophylactic or therapeutic dietary administration of capsaicin for reduction of Salmonella in broiler chickens. Avian Dis. 2005;49:527–533. doi: 10.1637/7252-080404R.1. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
49. Wang M.L., Suo X., Gu J.H., Zhang W.W., Fang Q., Wang X. Influence of grape seed proanthocyanidin extract in broiler chickens: Effect on chicken coccidiosis and antioxidant status. Poult. Sci. 2008;87:2273–2280. doi: 10.3382/ps.2008-00077. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
50. Guo F.C., Williams B.A., Kwakkel R.P., Li H.S., Li X.P., Luo J.Y., Li W.K., Verstegen M.W.A. Effects of mushroom and herb polysaccharides, as alternatives for an antibiotic, on the caecal microbial ecosystem in broiler chickens. Poult. Sci. 2004;83:175–182. doi: 10.1093/ps/83.2.175. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
51. Guo F.C., Kwakkel R.P., Williams B.A., Li W.K., Li H.S., Luo J.Y., Li X.P., Wei Y.X., Yan Z.T., Verstegen M.W.A. Effects of mushroom and herb polysaccharides, as alternatives for an antibiotic, on growth performance of broilers. Br. Poult. Sci. 2004;45:684–694. doi: 10.1080/00071660400006214. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
52. Willis W.L., Isikhuemhen O.S., Ibrahim S.A. Performance assessment of broiler chickens given mushroom extract alone or in combination with probiotics. Poult. Sci. 2007;86:1856–1860. doi: 10.1093/ps/86.9.1856. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
53. Alp M., Midilli M., Kocabağlı N., Yılmaz H., Turan N., Gargılı A., Acar N. The effects of dietary oregano essential oil on live performance, carcass yield, serum immunoglobulin G level, and oocyst count in broilers. J. Appl. Poult. Res. 2012;21:630–636. doi: 10.3382/japr.2012-00551. [Cross Ref]
54. Basmacioğlu Malayoğlu H., Baysal Ş., Misirlioğlu Z., Polat M., Yilmaz H., Turan N. Effects of oregano essential oil with or without feed enzymes on growth performance, digestive enzyme, nutrient digestibility, lipid metabolism and immune response of broilers fed on wheat–soybean meal diets. Br. Poult. Sci. 2010;51:67–80. doi: 10.1080/00071660903573702. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
55. Bozkurt M., Ege G., Aysul N., Akşit H., Tüzün A.E., Küçükyılmaz K., Borum A.E., Uygun M., Aksit D., Aypak S., et al. Effect of anticoccidial monensin with oregano essential oil on broilers experimentally challenged with mixed Eimeria spp. Poult. Sci. 2016;95:1858–1868. doi: 10.3382/ps/pew077. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
56. Giannenas I., Florou-Paneri P., Papazahariadou M., Christaki E., Botsoglou N.A., Spais A.B. Effect of dietary supplementation with oregano essential oil on performance of broilers after experimental infection with Eimeria tenella. Arch. Anim. Nutr. 2003;57:99–106. doi: 10.1080/0003942031000107299. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
57. Horošová K., Bujňáková D., Kmet V. Effect of oregano essential oil on chicken lactobacilli and E. coli. Folia Microbiol. 2006;51:278–280. doi: 10.1007/BF02931812. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
58. Kırkpınar F., Ünlü H.B., Özdemir G. Effects of oregano and garlic essential oils on performance, carcass, organ and blood characteristics and intestinal microflora of broilers. Livest. Sci. 2011;137:219–225. doi: 10.1016/j.livsci.2010.11.010. [Cross Ref]
59. Mohiti-Asli M., Ghanaatparast-Rashti M. Dietary oregano essential oil alleviates experimentally induced coccidiosis in broilers. Prev. Vet. Med. 2015;120:195–202. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2015.03.014. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
60. Roofchaee A., Irani M., Ebrahimzadeh M.A., Akbari M.R. Effect of dietary oregano (Origanum vulgare L.) essential oil on growth performance, caecal microflora and serum antioxidant activity of broiler chickens. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2011;10:6177–6183. doi: 10.5897/AJB10.2596. [Cross Ref]
61. Silva M.A.D., Pessotti B.M.D.S., Zanini S.F., Colnago G.L., Rodrigues M.R.A., Nunes L.D.C., Zanini M.S., Martins I.V.F. Intestinal mucosa structure of broiler chickens infected experimentally with Eimeria tenella and treated with essential oil of oregano. Ciênc. Rural. 2009;39:1471–1477. doi: 10.1590/S0103-84782009005000135. [Cross Ref]
62. Tsinas A., Giannenas I., Voidarou C., Tzora A., Skoufos J. Effects of an oregano based dietary supplement on performance of broiler chickens experimentally infected with Eimeria acervulina and Eimeria maxima. J. Poult. Sci. 2011;48:194–200. doi: 10.2141/jpsa.010123. [Cross Ref]
63. Waldenstedt L. Effect of vaccination against coccidiosis in combination with an antibacterial oregano (Origanum vulgare) compound in organic broiler production. Acta Agric. Scand. A Anim. Sci. 2003;53:101–109. doi: 10.1080/09064700310007977. [Cross Ref]
64. Emami N.K., Samie A., Rahmani H.R., Ruiz-Feria C.A. The effect of peppermint essential oil and fructooligosaccharides, as alternatives to virginiamycin, on growth performance, digestibility, gut morphology and immune response of male broilers. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2012;175:57–64. doi: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2012.04.001. [Cross Ref]
65. Vidanarachchi J.K., Mikkelsen L.L., Constantinoiu C.C., Choct M., Iji P.A. Natural plant extracts and prebiotic compounds as alternatives to antibiotics in broiler chicken diets in a necrotic enteritis challenge model. Anim. Prod. Sci. 2013;53:1247–1259. doi: 10.1071/AN12374. [Cross Ref]
66. Youn H.J., Noh J.W. Screening of the anticoccidial effects of herb extracts against Eimeria tenella. Vet. Parasitol. 2001;96:257–263. doi: 10.1016/S0304-4017(01)00385-5. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
67. Cross D.E., McDevitt R.M., Hillman K., Acamovic T. The effect of herbs and their associated essential oils on performance, dietary digestibility and gut microflora in chickens from 7 to 28 days of age. Br. Poult. Sci. 2007;48:496–506. doi: 10.1080/00071660701463221. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
68. Cross D.E., McDevitt R.M., Acamovic T. Herbs, thyme essential oil and condensed tannin extracts as dietary supplements for broilers, and their effects on performance, digestibility, volatile fatty acids and organoleptic properties. Br. Poult. Sci. 2011;52:227–237. doi: 10.1080/00071668.2011.559454. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
69. Placha I., Takacova J., Ryzner M., Cobanova K., Laukova A., Strompfova V., Venglovska K., Faix S. Effect of thyme essential oil and selenium on intestine integrity and antioxidant status of broilers. Br. Poult. Sci. 2014;55:105–114. doi: 10.1080/00071668.2013.873772. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
70. Lee K.W., Everts H., Kappert H.J., Frehner M., Losa R., Beynen A.C. Effects of dietary essential oil components on growth performance, digestive enzymes and lipid metabolism in female broiler chickens. Br. Poult. Sci. 2003;44:450–457. doi: 10.1080/0007166031000085508. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
71. Naidoo V., McGaw L.J., Bisschop S.P., Duncan N., Eloff J.N. The value of plant extracts with antioxidant activity in attenuating coccidiosis in broiler chickens. Vet. Parasitol. 2008;153:214–219. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2008.02.013. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
72. Denli M., Okan F., Uluocak A.N. Effect of dietary supplementation of herb essential oils on the growth performance, carcass and intestinal characteristics of quail (Coturnix coturnix japonica) S. Afr. J. Anim. Sci. 2004;34:174–179.
73. Khaksar V., Van Krimpen M., Hashemipour H., Pilevar M. Effects of thyme essential oil on performance, some blood parameters and ileal microflora of Japanese quail. J. Poult. Sci. 2012;49:106–110. doi: 10.2141/jpsa.011089. [Cross Ref]
74. Abousekken M.S., Azazy M.F., El-Khtam A.O., Zaglool W.K. Impact of Artemisia Annua L. Supplementation on Growth Performance and Control of Coccidiosis in rabbit. J. Am. Sci. 2015;11:159–169. doi: 10.7537/marsjas110515.19. [Cross Ref]
75. Placha I., Chrastinova L., Laukova A., Cobanova K., Takacova J., Strompfova V., Chrenkova M., Formelova Z., Faix S. Effect of thyme oil on small intestine integrity and antioxidant status, phagocytic activity and gastrointestinal microbiota in rabbits. Acta Vet. Hung. 2013;61:197–208. doi: 10.1556/AVet.2013.012. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
76. Giannenas I., Papaneophytou C.P., Tsalie E., Pappas I., Triantafillou E., Tontis D., Kontopidis G.A. Dietary supplementation of benzoic acid and essential oil compounds affects buffering capacity of the feeds, performance of turkey poults and their antioxidant status, pH in the digestive tract, intestinal microbiota and morphology. Asian-Australas. J. Anim. Sci. 2014;27:225–236. doi: 10.5713/ajas.2013.13376. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
77. Yan L., Wang J.P., Kim H.J., Meng Q.W., Ao X., Hong S.M., Kim I.H. Influence of essential oil supplementation and diets with different nutrient densities on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, blood characteristics, meat quality and faecal noxious gas content in grower–finisher pigs. Livest. Sci. 2010;128:115–122. doi: 10.1016/j.livsci.2009.11.008. [Cross Ref]
78. Yan L., Meng Q.W., Kim I.H. The effect of an herb extract mixture on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, blood characteristics and faecal noxious gas content in growing pigs. Livest. Sci. 2011;141:143–147. doi: 10.1016/j.livsci.2011.05.011. [Cross Ref]
79. Ahmed S.T., Hossain M.E., Kim G.M., Hwang J.A., Ji H., Yang C.J. Effects of Resveratrol and Essential Oils on Growth Performance, Immunity, Digestibility and Faecal Microbial Shedding in Challenged Piglets. Asian-Australas. J. Anim. Sci. 2013;26:683–690. doi: 10.5713/ajas.2012.12683. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
80. Li S.Y., Ru Y.J., Liu M., Xu B., Péron A., Shi X.G. The effect of essential oils on performance, immunity and gut microbial population in weaner pigs. Livest. Sci. 2012;145:119–123. doi: 10.1016/j.livsci.2012.01.005. [Cross Ref]
81. Li P., Piao X., Ru Y., Han X., Xue L., Zhang H. Effects of adding essential oil to the diet of weaned pigs on performance, nutrient utilization, immune response and intestinal health. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 2012;25:1617–1626. doi: 10.5713/ajas.2012.12292. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
82. Maenner K., Vahjen W., Simon O. Studies on the effects of essential-oil-based feed additives on performance, ileal nutrient digestibility, and selected bacterial groups in the gastrointestinal tract of piglets. J. Anim. Sci. 2011;89:2106–2112. doi: 10.2527/jas.2010-2950. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
83. Manzanilla E.G., Perez J.F., Martin M., Kamel C., Baucells F., Gasa J. Effect of plant extracts and formic acid on the intestinal equilibrium of early-weaned pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 2004;82:3210–3218. doi: 10.2527/2004.82113210x. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
84. Manzanilla E.G., Nofrarias M., Anguita M., Castillo M., Perez J.F., Martin-Orue S.M., Kamel C., Gasa J. Effects of butyrate, avilamycin, and a plant extract combination on the intestinal equilibrium of early-weaned pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 2006;84:2743–2751. doi: 10.2527/jas.2005-509. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
85. Manzanilla E.G., Pérez J.F., Martín M., Blandón J.C., Baucells F., Kamel C., Gasa J. Dietary protein modifies effect of plant extracts in the intestinal ecosystem of the pig at weaning. J. Anim. Sci. 2009;87:2029–2037. doi: 10.2527/jas.2008-1210. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
86. Muhl A., Liebert F. Growth and parameters of microflora in intestinal and faecal samples of piglets due to application of a phytogenic feed additive. J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr. 2007;91:411–418. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0396.2006.00668.x. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
87. Muhl A., Liebert F. No impact of a phytogenic feed additive on digestion and unspecific immune reaction in piglets. J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr. 2007;91:426–431. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0396.2006.00671.x. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
88. Namkung H., Gong M.L.J., Yu H., Cottrill M., de Lange C. Impact of feeding blends of organic acids and herbal extracts on growth performance, gut microbiota and digestive function in newly weaned pigs. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 2004;84:697–704. doi: 10.4141/A04-005. [Cross Ref]
89. Yan L., Meng Q.W., Kim I.H. Effect of an herb extract mixture on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, blood characteristics, and faecal microbial shedding in weanling pigs. Livest. Sci. 2012;145:189–195. doi: 10.1016/j.livsci.2012.02.001. [Cross Ref]
90. Zeng Z., Xu X., Zhang Q., Li P., Zhao P., Li Q., Liu J., Piao X. Effects of essential oil supplementation of a low-energy diet on performance, intestinal morphology and microflora, immune properties and antioxidant activities in weaned pigs. Anim. Sci. J. 2015;86:279–285. doi: 10.1111/asj.12277. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
91. Zhang S., Jung J.H., Kim H.S., Kim B.Y., Kim I.H. Influences of phytoncide supplementation on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, blood profiles, diarrhea scores and faecal microflora shedding in weaning pigs. Asian-Australas. J. Anim. Sci. 2012;25:1309–1315. doi: 10.5713/ajas.2012.12170. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
92. Huang C.W., Lee T.T., Shih Y.C., Yu B. Effects of dietary supplementation of Chinese medicinal herbs on polymorphonuclear neutrophil immune activity and small intestinal morphology in weanling pigs. J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr. 2012;96:285–294. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0396.2011.01151.x. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
93. Bodas R., Prieto N., García-González R., Andrés S., Giráldez F.J., López S. Manipulation of rumen fermentation and methane production with plant secondary metabolites. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2012;176:78–93. doi: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2012.07.010. [Cross Ref]
94. Boadi D., Benchaar C., Chiquette J., Massé D. Mitigation strategies to reduce enteric methane emissions from dairy cows: Update review. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 2004;84:319–335. doi: 10.4141/A03-109. [Cross Ref]
95. Benchaar C., Greathead H. Essential oils and opportunities to mitigate enteric methane emissions from ruminants. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2011;166:338–355. doi: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2011.04.024. [Cross Ref]
96. McIntosh F.M., Williams P., Losa R., Wallace R.J., Beever D.A., Newbold C.J. Effects of essential oils on ruminal microorganisms and their protein metabolism. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2003;69:5011–5014. doi: 10.1128/AEM.69.8.5011-5014.2003. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
97. Calsamiglia S., Busquet M., Cardozo P.W., Castillejos L., Ferret A. Invited review: Essential oils as modifiers of rumen microbial fermentation. J. Dairy Sci. 2007;90:2580–2595. doi: 10.3168/jds.2006-644. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
98. Benchaar C., Calsamiglia S., Chaves A.V., Fraser G.R., Colombatto D., McAllister T.A., Beauchemin K.A. A review of plant-derived essential oils in ruminant nutrition and production. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2008;145:209–228. doi: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2007.04.014. [Cross Ref]
99. Beauchemin K.A., McAllister T.A., McGinn S.M. Dietary mitigation of enteric methane from cattle. CAB Rev. Perspect. Agric. Vet. Sci. Nutr. Nat. Resour. 2009;4:1–18. doi: 10.1079/PAVSNNR20094035. [Cross Ref]
100. Benchaar C., Lettat A., Hassanat F., Yang W.Z., Forster R.J., Petit H.V., Chouinard P.Y. Eugenol for dairy cows fed low or high concentrate diets: Effects on digestion, ruminal fermentation characteristics, rumen microbial populations and milk fatty acid profile. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2012;178:139–150. doi: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2012.10.005. [Cross Ref]
101. Tager L.R., Krause K.M. Effects of essential oils on rumen fermentation, milk production, and feeding behavior in lactating dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 2011;94:2455–2464. doi: 10.3168/jds.2010-3505. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
102. Yang W.Z., Benchaar C., Ametaj B.N., Chaves A.V., He M.L., McAllister T.A. Effects of garlic and juniper berry essential oils on ruminal fermentation and on the site and extent of digestion in lactating cows. J. Dairy Sci. 2007;90:5671–5681. doi: 10.3168/jds.2007-0369. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
103. Hristov A.N., Lee C., Cassidy T., Heyler K., Tekippe J.A., Varga G.A., Corl B., Brandt R.C. Effect of Origanum vulgare L. leaves on rumen fermentation, production, and milk fatty acid composition in lactating dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 2013;96:1189–1202. doi: 10.3168/jds.2012-5975. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
104. Tekippe J.A., Hristov A.N., Heyler K.S., Cassidy T.W., Zheljazkov V.D., Ferreira J.F.S., Karnati S.K., Varga G.A. Rumen fermentation and production effects of Origanum vulgare L. leaves in lactating dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 2011;94:5065–5079. doi: 10.3168/jds.2010-4095. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
105. Benchaar C., Petit H.V., Berthiaume R., Whyte T.D., Chouinard P.Y. Effects of addition of essential oils and monensin premix on digestion, ruminal fermentation, milk production, and milk composition in dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 2006;89:4352–4364. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(06)72482-1. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
106. Benchaar C., Petit H.V., Berthiaume R., Ouellet D.R., Chiquette J., Chouinard P.Y. Effects of essential oils on digestion, ruminal fermentation, rumen microbial populations, milk production, and milk composition in dairy cows fed alfalfa silage or corn silage. J. Dairy Sci. 2007;90:886–897. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(07)71572-2. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
107. Kung L., Williams P., Schmidt R.J., Hu W. A blend of essential plant oils used as an additive to alter silage fermentation or used as a feed additive for lactating dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 2008;91:4793–4800. doi: 10.3168/jds.2008-1402. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
108. Spanghero M., Robinson P.H., Zanfi C., Fabbro E. Effect of increasing doses of a microencapsulated blend of essential oils on performance of lactating primiparous dairy cows. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2009;153:153–157. doi: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2009.06.004. [Cross Ref]
109. Santos M.B., Robinson P.H., Williams P., Losa R. Effects of addition of an essential oil complex to the diet of lactating dairy cows on whole tract digestion of nutrients and productive performance. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2010;157:64–71. doi: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2010.02.001. [Cross Ref]
110. Meyer N.F., Erickson G.E., Klopfenstein T.J., Greenquist M.A., Luebbe M.K., Williams P., Engstrom M.A. Effect of essential oils, tylosin, and monensin on finishing steer performance, carcass characteristics, liver abscesses, ruminal fermentation, and digestibility. J. Anim. Sci. 2009;87:2346–2354. doi: 10.2527/jas.2008-1493. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
111. Vakili A.R., Khorrami B., Mesgaran M.D., Parand E. The effects of Thyme and Cinnamon essential oils on performance, rumen fermentation and blood metabolites in Holstein calves consuming high concentrate diet. Asian-Australas. J. Anim. Sci. 2013;26:935–944. doi: 10.5713/ajas.2012.12636. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
112. Fandiño I., Calsamiglia S., Ferret A., Blanch M. Anise and capsicum as alternatives to monensin to modify rumen fermentation in beef heifers fed a high concentrate diet. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2008;145:409–417. doi: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2007.04.018. [Cross Ref]
113. Valero M.V., Prado R.M.D., Zawadzki F., Eiras C.E., Madrona G.S., Prado I.N.D. Propolis and essential oils additives in the diets improved animal performance and feed efficiency of bulls finished in feedlot. Acta Sci. Anim. Sci. 2014;36:419–426. doi: 10.4025/actascianimsci.v36i4.23856. [Cross Ref]
114. Kongmun P., Wanapat M., Pakdee P., Navanukraw C., Yu Z. Manipulation of rumen fermentation and ecology of swamp buffalo by coconut oil and garlic powder supplementation. Livest. Sci. 2011;135:84–92. doi: 10.1016/j.livsci.2010.06.131. [Cross Ref]
115. Thao N.T., Wanapat M., Cherdthong A., Kang S. Effects of eucalyptus crude oils supplementation on rumen fermentation, microorganism and nutrient digestibility in swamp buffaloes. Asian-Australas. J. Anim. Sci. 2014;27:46–54. doi: 10.5713/ajas.2013.13301. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
116. Chaves A.V., Stanford K., Gibson L.L., McAllister T.A., Benchaar C. Effects of carvacrol and cinnamaldehyde on intake, rumen fermentation, growth performance, and carcass characteristics of growing lambs. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2008;145:396–408. doi: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2007.04.016. [Cross Ref]
117. Chaves A.V., Stanford K., Dugan M.E.R., Gibson L.L., McAllister T.A., Van Herk F., Benchaar C. Effects of cinnamaldehyde, garlic and juniper berry essential oils on rumen fermentation, blood metabolites, growth performance, and carcass characteristics of growing lambs. Livest. Sci. 2008;117:215–224. doi: 10.1016/j.livsci.2007.12.013. [Cross Ref]
118. Bhatt R.S., Soren N.M., Tripathi M.K., Karim S.A. Effects of different levels of coconut oil supplementation on performance, digestibility, rumen fermentation and carcass traits of Malpura lambs. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2011;164:29–37. doi: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2010.11.021. [Cross Ref]
119. Giannenas I., Skoufos J., Giannakopoulos C., Wiemann M., Gortzi O., Lalas S., Kyriazakis I. Effects of essential oils on milk production, milk composition, and rumen microbiota in Chios dairy ewes. J. Dairy Sci. 2011;94:5569–5577. doi: 10.3168/jds.2010-4096. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
120. Klevenhusen F., Zeitz J.O., Duval S., Kreuzer M., Soliva C.R. Garlic oil and its principal component diallyl disulfide fail to mitigate methane, but improve digestibility in sheep. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2011;166:356–363. doi: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2011.04.071. [Cross Ref]
121. Lin B., Lu Y., Salem A.Z.M., Wang J.H., Liang Q., Liu J.X. Effects of essential oil combinations on sheep ruminal fermentation and digestibility of a diet with fumarate included. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2013;184:24–32. doi: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2013.05.011. [Cross Ref]
122. Ma T., Chen D.D., Tu Y., Zhang N.F., Si B.W., Deng K.D., Diao Q.Y. Effect of dietary supplementation with resveratrol on nutrient digestibility, methanogenesis and ruminal microbial flora in sheep. J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr. 2015;99:676–683. doi: 10.1111/jpn.12264. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
123. Malecky M., Broudiscou L.P., Schmidely P. Effects of two levels of monoterpene blend on rumen fermentation, terpene and nutrient flows in the duodenum and milk production in dairy goats. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2009;154:24–35. doi: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2009.07.004. [Cross Ref]
124. Pisoschi A.M., Pop A. The role of antioxidants in the chemistry of oxidative stress: A review. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2015;97:55–74. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2015.04.040. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
125. Rice-Evans C.A., Miller N.J., Bolwell P.G., Bramley P.M., Pridham J.B. The relative antioxidant activities of plant-derived polyphenolic flavonoids. Free Radic. Res. 1995;22:375–383. doi: 10.3109/10715769509145649. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
126. Zheng W., Wang S.Y. Antioxidant activity and phenolic compounds in selected herbs. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2001;49:5165–5170. doi: 10.1021/jf010697n. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
127. Miguel M.G. Antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activities of essential oils: A short review. Molecules. 2010;15:9252–9287. doi: 10.3390/molecules15129252. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
128. Bakkali F., Averbeck S., Averbeck D., Idaomar M. Biological effects of essential oils—A review. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2008;46:446–475. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2007.09.106. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
129. Govaris A., Botsoglou N., Papageorgiou G., Botsoglou E., Ambrosiadis I. Dietary versus post-mortem use of oregano oil and/or α-tocopherol in turkeys to inhibit development of lipid oxidation in meat during refrigerated storage. Int. J. Food Sci. Nutr. 2004;55:115–123. doi: 10.1080/09637480410001666487. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
130. Decker E.A., Park Y. Healthier meat products as functional foods. Meat Sci. 2010;86:49–55. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2010.04.021. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
131. Florou-Paneri P., Nikolakakis I., Giannenas I., Koidis A., Botsoglou E., Dotas V., Mitsopoulos I. Hen performance and egg quality as affected by dietary oregano essential oil and a-tocopheryl acetate supplementation. Int. J. Poult. Sci. 2005;4:449–454.
132. Avila-Ramos F., Pro-Martinez A., Sosa-Montes E., Cuca-Garcia J.M., Becerril-Perez C.M., Figueroa-Velasco J.L., Narciso-Gaytan C. Effects of dietary oregano essential oil and vitamin E on the lipid oxidation stability of cooked chicken breast meat. Poult. Sci. 2012;91:505–511. doi: 10.3382/ps.2011-01731. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
133. Botsoglou N.A., Florou-Paneri P., Christaki E., Fletouris D.J., Spais A.B. Effect of dietary oregano essential oil on performance of chickens and on iron-induced lipid oxidation of breast, thigh and abdominal fat tissues. Br. Poult. Sci. 2002;43:223–230. doi: 10.1080/00071660120121436. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
134. Botsoglou N.A., Christaki E., Fletouris D.J., Florou-Paneri P., Spais A.B. The effect of dietary oregano essential oil on lipid oxidation in raw and cooked chicken during refrigerated storage. Meat Sci. 2002;62:259–265. doi: 10.1016/S0309-1740(01)00256-X. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
135. Botsoglou N.A., Fletouris D.J., Florou-Paneri P., Christaki E., Spais A.B. Inhibition of lipid oxidation in long-term frozen stored chicken meat by dietary oregano essential oil and alpha-tocopheryl acetate supplementation. Food Res. Int. 2003;36:207–213. doi: 10.1016/S0963-9969(02)00095-9. [Cross Ref]
136. Kirkpinar F., Ünlü H.B., Serdaroğlu M., Turp G.Y. Effects of dietary oregano and garlic essential oils on carcass characteristics, meat composition, colour, pH and sensory quality of broiler meat. Br. Poult. Sci. 2014;55:157–166. doi: 10.1080/00071668.2013.879980. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
137. Marcincak S., Cabadaj R., Popelka P., Soltysova L. Antioxidative effect of oregano supplemented to broilers on oxidative stability of poultry meat. Slov. Vet. Res. 2008;45:61–66.
138. Simitzis P.E., Deligeorgis S.G., Bizelis J.A., Dardamani A., Theodosiou I., Fegeros K. Effect of dietary oregano oil supplementation on lamb meat characteristics. Meat Sci. 2008;79:217–223. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2007.09.005. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
139. Simitzis P.E., Symeon G.K., Charismiadou M.A., Bizelis J.A., Deligeorgis S.G. The effects of dietary oregano oil supplementation on pig meat characteristics. Meat Sci. 2010;84:670–676. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2009.11.001. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
140. Janz J.A.M., Morel P.C.H., Wilkinson B.H.P., Purchas R.W. Preliminary investigation of the effects of low-level dietary inclusion of fragrant essential oils and oleoresins on pig performance and pork quality. Meat Sci. 2007;75:350–355. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2006.06.027. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
141. Botsoglou N.A., Florou-Paneri P., Christaki E., Giannenas I., Spais A.B. Performance of rabbits and oxidative stability of muscle tissues as affected by dietary supplementation with oregano essential oil. Arch. Anim. Nutr. 2004;58:209–218. doi: 10.1080/00039420410001701404. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
142. Botsoglou N.A., Grigoropoulou S.H., Botsoglou E., Govaris A., Papageorgiou G. The effects of dietary oregano essential oil and a-tocopheryl acetate on lipid oxidation in raw and cooked turkey during refrigerated storage. Meat Sci. 2003;65:1193–1200. doi: 10.1016/S0309-1740(03)00029-9. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
143. Florou-Paneri P., Galatos G., Govaris A., Botsoglou D., Giannenas I., Ambrosiadis I. Oregano herb versus oregano essential oil as feed supplements to increase the oxidative stability of turkey meat. Int. J. Poult. Sci. 2005;4:866–871.
144. Simitzis P.E., Bizelis J.A., Fegeros K., Deligeorgis S.G. Effect of dietary oregano oil supplementation on sheep milk characteristics. Anim. Sci. Rev. 2007;37:69–78.
145. Yesilbag D., Gezen S.S., Biricik H., Meral Y. Effects of dietary rosemary and oregano volatile oil mixture on quail performance, egg traits and egg oxidative stability. Br. Poult. Sci. 2013;54:231–237. doi: 10.1080/00071668.2013.778389. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
146. O’Grady M.N., Maher M., Troy D.J., Moloney A.P., Kerry J.P. An assessment of dietary supplementation with tea catechins and rosemary extract on the quality of fresh beef. Meat Sci. 2006;73:132–143. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2005.11.008. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
147. Vasta V., Aoudi D., Bronga D.M.R., Scerra M., Luciano G., Priolo A., Ben Salem H. Effect of the dietary supplementation of essential oils from rosemary and artemisia on muscle fatty acids and volatile compound profiles in Barbarine lambs. Meat Sci. 2013;95:235–241. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2012.12.021. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
148. Serrano R., Jordan M.J., Banon S. Use of dietary rosemary extract in ewe and lamb to extend the shelf life of raw and cooked meat. Small Rumin. Res. 2014;116:144–152. doi: 10.1016/j.smallrumres.2013.10.019. [Cross Ref]
149. Smeti S., Atti N., Mahouachi M., Munoz F. Use of dietary rosemary (Rosmarinus officinalis L.) essential oils to increase the shelf life of Barbarine light lamb meat. Small Rumin. Res. 2013;113:340–345. doi: 10.1016/j.smallrumres.2013.04.001. [Cross Ref]
150. Aoudi D., Luciano G., Vasta V., Nasri S., Brogna D.M.R., Abidi S., Priolo A., Ben Salem H. The antioxidant status and oxidative stability of muscle from lambs receiving oral administration of Artemisia herba alba and Rosmarinus officinalis essential oils. Meat Sci. 2014;97:237–243. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2014.02.005. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
151. Ortuno J., Serrano R., Jordan M.J., Banon S. Shelf life of meat from lambs given essential oil-free rosemary extract containing carnosic acid plus carnosol at 200 or 400 mg kg−1. Meat Sci. 2014;96:1452–1459. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2013.11.021. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
152. Lopez-Bote C.J., Gray J.I., Gomaa E.A., Flegal C.J. Effect of dietary administration of oil extracts from rosemary and sage on lipid oxidation in broiler meat. Br. Poult. Sci. 1998;39:235–240. doi: 10.1080/00071669889187. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
153. Yesilbag D., Eren M., Agel H., Kovanlikaya A., Balci F. Effects of dietary rosemary, rosemary volatile oil and vitamin E on broiler performance, meat quality and serum SOD activity. Br. Poult. Sci. 2011;52:472–482. doi: 10.1080/00071668.2011.599026. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
154. Haak L., Raes K., Van Dyck S., De Smet S. Effect of dietary rosemary and a-tocopheryl acetate on the oxidative stability of raw and cooked pork following oxidized linseed oil administration. Meat Sci. 2008;78:239–247. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2007.06.005. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
155. Chiofalo V., Liotta L., Fiumano R., Riolo E.B., Chiofalo B. Influence of dietary supplementation of Rosmarinus officinalis L. on performances of dairy ewes organically managed. Small Rumin. Res. 2012;104:122–128. doi: 10.1016/j.smallrumres.2011.09.051. [Cross Ref]

Articles from Medicines are provided here courtesy of Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)