PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of scirepAboutEditorial BoardFor AuthorsScientific Reports
 
Sci Rep. 2017; 7: 10869.
Published online 2017 September 7. doi:  10.1038/s41598-017-11228-7
PMCID: PMC5589865

The formation of nanocrystalline ZrO2 nuclei in a Li2O-Al2O3-SiO2 glass – a combined XANES and TEM study

Abstract

The high economic importance of glass ceramics based on Li2O/Al2O3/SiO2 (LAS) is mainly due to their low coefficients of thermal expansion (CTE), which make these materials suitable candidates for a number of applications. The exact mechanism of the crystallization processes in LAS glasses is still not fully understood. The present work focuses on the formation and development of nanocrystalline ZrO2 within an LAS base composition which contains only ZrO2 as nucleating agent. Using a combination of transmission electron microscopy and X-ray absorption spectroscopy techniques, the temporal evolution of the ZrO2 nanocrystal formation is described. It is found that the formation of ZrO2 is initiated by liquid-liquid phase separation droplets with high Zr content, which eventually evolve into the nanocrystalline ZrO2 precipitations. This process is accompanied by a gradual change of the coordination of the tetravalent Zr ions from sixfold in the glass to eightfold in the crystals. The diameters of the ZrO2 crystals stay well below 4 nm, even at late stages. The degree of crystallization at each step of the crystallization process is deduced, and from that, the Avrami coefficient n is determined to be n  1, which describes a barrier-limited crystal growth process.

Introduction

Nowadays, materials with low, i.e. near to zero thermal expansion find many applications, such as high temperature (furnace) windows, cook top panels, telescope mirrors, as well as numerous devices in optics and photonics1. Especially glass ceramics from the Li2O-Al2O3-SiO2 (LAS) system find widespread use in this respect1. The key physical property of these materials is the coefficient of thermal expansion (CTE), which should be close to zero over a wide range of temperatures1. This is essential especially for high temperature applications, because here, a high resistance against thermal shock is required, and thermal stresses in components with a strong temperature gradient are to be minimized1. In LAS glass ceramics, a CTE close to zero can be achieved if a high volume concentration of a crystalline phase with a negative thermal expansion coefficient is present in parallel to a host glass matrix that exhibits a positive thermal expansion coefficient. Besides this phase, other phases showing a positive coefficient of thermal expansion may also occur. By tailoring the volume fraction of the phases with different CTEs within the bulk LAS material, a CTE of the multi-phase glass ceramic material, that in total averages to zero, can be achieved2, 3. The crystalline LAS phases with negative thermal expansion that are suitable for low expansion glass ceramics are aluminosilicates, mainly β-spodumene, β-eucryptite, high-quartz solid solutions or keatite solid solutions46. Even if these glass ceramics exhibit a high volume fraction of the above-mentioned crystalline phases, they might nevertheless be fully transparent for visible light: if the crystal sizes are kept well-below half of the visible wavelength range, light scattering within the material is prevented. Thus, if transparent glass ceramics with a CTE close to zero are desired, care has to be taken that the crystal sizes do not extend some 10 nm7, 8.

A homogeneous bulk nucleation of numerous, nanoscaled LAS crystals with negative CTE is usually promoted by adding nucleating agents to the glass. Without the latter, surface nucleation will be the dominating crystallization process, leading to an (unwanted) fairly coarse, and - in surface-near regions – possibly even oriented microstructure. The addition of nucleating agents, however, may result in volume nucleation and crystallization of LAS crystals with sizes in the nanometer range, if the nucleation agent itself, once precipitated during thermal treatment of the glass, is homogeneously distributed within the glass bulk and has only nanoscale dimensions. Common nucleating agents for LAS glass ceramics described in the literature are TiO2 6, 913 and ZrO2 1417, or both of them1419, which commonly leads to the precipitation of ZrTiO4. We recently reported on the effect of the concentration of TiO2 and ZrO2 on the crystallization behaviour, especially on the resulting microstructure of the glass ceramics19.

The addition of nucleating agents to the LAS green glass composition is considered crucial to gain the aspired volume-crystallized LAS glass ceramics. Nevertheless, although a number of studies delivered considerable insights into aspects of nucleation in LAS glasses in recent years2024, the complex mechanisms of the crystallisation of nucleation agents and the subsequent growth of the crystalline LAS phases are still not fully understood25. In the past, we have shown that it is possible to determine and describe the crystallization mechanism of the nucleation agent ZrTiO4 in LAS glass ceramics, with a combination of X-ray absorption near edge structure spectroscopy (XANES) and analytical transmission electron microscopy (TEM)26.

Only recently, we reported on the LAS phase formation and microstructure evolution as a function of the temperature and time of thermal treatment in glass ceramics that are solely nucleated with the nucleating agent ZrO2 27. It was also reported that the ZrO2 concentration plays a crucial role in the systems MgO/Al2O3/SiO2 and MgO/ZnO/Al2O3/SiO2 2832.

In this paper, we go one step further and describe the crystallization behaviour of the nucleating agent itself within these LAS glasses, i.e., we describe the temporal course of crystallization of ZrO2 nanocrystals within a glassy matrix, at a given temperature of thermal treatment. By using a combination of X-ray Absorption Near Edge Structure spectroscopy (XANES), X-ray Diffraction (XRD), and (Scanning) Transmission Electron Microscopy (S)TEM including Energy-Dispersive X-Ray Spectroscopy (EDXS), the evolution of nanoscaled, Zr-rich liquid-liquid phase separation droplets into nanoscaled ZrO2 crystals is followed. For a given temperature, the fraction of Zr within the samples that is already crystallized to ZrO2 is derived as a function of the time. From the latter, the Avrami coefficient is deduced, and in combination with STEM-EDX results, it is shown that the mean diameter of the ZrO2 nanocrystals does not increase with time27, since they are surrounded by an Al-rich diffusion barrier27.

Experimental

Raw materials of Li2CO3 (UCB), LiNO3 (Honeywell Riedel de Haën AG), Na2CO3, SiO2, K2CO3 (all from Carl Roth GmbH & Co. KG), 4 MgCO3[middot]Mg(OH)2[middot]4H2O (Merck KGaA), Al(OH)3 (Sumitomo Chemical), TiO2 (Germed DDR), ZnO (Vertriebsgemeinschaft für Harzer Zinkoxide GmbH (VHZ), Heubach), ZrO2 (Tosoh), Sb2O3 (Ferak Berlin GmbH) and BaCO3 (SABED) were used. The chemical composition of the studied glass is shown in Table 1. It is close to that of the commercially available Robax™ glass (SCHOTT AG), with the exception that as nucleating agent, only 3.0 mol% ZrO2 was chosen, while Robax™ contains both ZrO2 and TiO2.

Table 1
Chemical composition of the studied glass in mol%.

A batch of 300 g glass was melted in an inductively heated furnace within a platinum/rhodium crucible. First, a temperature of 1615 °C, kept for 2 h, was supplied. Then, the crucible with the melt was transferred to a MoSi2 furnace and for further melting, a temperature of 1680 °C was supplied and kept for 3 h. Finally, the glass melt was cast into a brass mold. The glass was then transferred to a muffle furnace, preheated to 700 °C. The furnace was subsequently switched off to allow the glass to cool to room temperature (cooling rate ~2 K/min).

The glass was cut into 0.5 × 0.5 × 0.5 cm3 pieces. To analyze the temporal course of the ZrO2 crystallization at a given temperature, a set of samples was thermally treated at 725 °C for different times t, ranging from t = 15 min to t = 24 h, in a pre-heated muffle furnace (Nabertherm).

For XRD investigations, the powdered samples were studied using a Rigaku MiniFlex300 X-Ray Diffractometer with Cu-K α radiation (λ  0.154 nm) in a 2θ range from 10 to 60°.

The glass transition temperature was measured by dilatometry with a Netzsch Dil 402-PC dilatometer, using sample pieces with a length of 25 mm and a diameter of 8 mm (heating rate: 10 K/min). For differential scanning calorimetry, a Linseis DSC Pt-1600 calorimeter was used, supplying a heating rate of 10 K/min. The density was determined with a helium pycnometer (AccuPyc 1330).

X-ray absorption near edge spectroscopy (XANES) at the Zr L- edges was performed at the Canadian Light Source (CLS) in Saskatoon, SK, Canada. The experiments were run at the Soft X-ray Micro Characterization Beamline (SXRMB). As monochromator, a Si single crystal, cut in (111) direction, was used, resulting in a resolving power of 104. The samples were fixed to the sample holder, using double-sided conducting carbon tape. The experiments were run in vacuum, with a residual pressure of approximately 10−8 mbar. The fluorescence yield (FY) data were recorded with a Si-Li drift detector. For the Zr L 2,3-edges, the energy range between 2,215 and 2,330 eV was investigated. The FY data were normalized to the incident beam intensity (I0), and background corrected using the commercially available software UNIFIT 201433, where an atan((E-E s)/β s) approach is used to describe the background at the edge jump, with the photon energy E, the edge position E s and the FWHM of the step 2β s.

The micro- and nanostructure of chosen samples was further studied using (scanning) transmission electron microscopy ((S)TEM). The transmission electron microscopy analysis was performed with a c s-abberation corrected FEI TITAN3 80–300 electron microscope at 80 kV acceleration voltage. The instrument is equipped with a high-angle annular dark field detector (Fischione Model 3000) to perform scanning TEM. In combination with energy-dispersive X-Ray spectroscopy analysis (EDXS) by means of a Super-X EDX detector that is equipped with four SDD detectors (FEI company), for some of the samples an element distribution analysis was performed. Element distribution mappings were obtained using the commercially available software Esprit (Bruker company). These mappings were derived by evaluation of the lateral distribution of the peak intensity, i.e., the area underlying the K edges of the analyzed elements, with an automatic, software-provided routine.

Sample preparation for (S)TEM was done using a purely mechanical wedge-polishing approach with a dedicated sample grinding and polishing tool (Multiprep, Allied company). Every sample was plane-parallel back-polished to a residual thickness of approximately 20 µm, followed by a second polishing step under a defined, small angle (2.6°) in order to render the samples into a wedge-like shape, whose edge tip is thin enough to be electron transparent. Each sample underwent a final Ar+ ion broad-beam milling step (precision ion polishing system PIPS, Gatan company) to remove polishing residues and to reach electron transparency. Finally, the samples were selectively carbon coated using a specific coating mask (CoatMaster, 3D- Micromac AG)34.

Results and Discussion

The casted glass is colorless as an effect of the lack of titanium, since an ilmenite coloration due to Fe3+-O-Ti4+ charge transfer with trace impurities of iron, cannot take place35. As described in a further study, the Tg of the studied glass is determined on the basis of the appropriate DSC profile, and, moreover, with a dilatometric method27. It results in temperatures of 711 °C (DSC) and 703 °C (dilatometry). The density of the glass is 2.55 g/cm3 and the coefficient of thermal expansion (CTE) was found to be 4.60 × 10−6 K−1 in the temperature range from 100 to 500 °C.

As the focus of this study is on the temporal evolution of the nucleation agent ZrO2 within the LAS glasses, rather than on the subsequent LAS phase formation itself, several samples of the LAS glass with the composition as stated in Table 1 were thermally treated at 725 °C for several periods of time between t = 15 min and t = 24 h. A temperature of 725 °C was chosen, since previous XRD studies indicated that, if glasses of the same LAS composition as used here are thermally treated for 24 h at 720 °C, ZrO2 is precipitating, yet without the subsequent formation of LAS phases. On the other hand, after crystallization at 730 °C for 24 h, the crystallization of LAS is already indicated by XRD27. For the present study, it was tried to provide a temperature as high as possible to ensure an efficient crystallization of ZrO2. Nevertheless, the applied temperature should still be low enough to suppress the subsequent crystallization of the LAS phase, in order to monitor the crystallization of the nucleation agent within the LAS glass alone. Otherwise, the undisturbed crystallization of ZrO2 could potentially be affected by the onset of the subsequent crystallization of the LAS phase, which is, after all, promoted by the nucleation agent.

XRD results

Figure 1 shows the XRD patterns of all samples, for which a constant crystallization temperature of 725 °C was supplied for different periods of times t (t = 0.25 h–24.00 h).

Figure 1
XRD patterns of LAS glass samples thermally treated at 725 °C for different periods of time [h]. The red highlighted patterns are described in detail in the discussion.

At the very early steps of nucleation, for short times t, no signs of the occurrence of crystalline phases within the samples can be found. The first visible, yet very notably broadened peaks at around 2θ = 30.1° and 52° can be observed after crystallization at t = 1.75 h, indicating the presence of a crystalline phase. These peaks can be attributed to either the tetragonal (JCPDS nr. 50–1089) or the cubic phase of ZrO2 (JCPDS nr. 49–1642). It is hard to distinguish between these two phases due to the only small tetragonal distortion, in combination with the XRD peak broadening due to the small crystallite sizes. After ongoing thermal treatment at t = 18 h, besides ZrO2, a low-intensity peak at 2θ = 25.6° also appears, which is the (101)-peak (100% peak) of the β-quartz LAS phase (JCPDS nr. 74–1095), i.e. the LAS phase which subsequently grows after initial nucleation of ZrO2 nanocrystals27. At t = 24 h, the intensity of the LAS peak increases notably, and is accompanied by further peaks at 2θ = 19.7, 48.5 and 56.8°, which are all attributable to the LAS β-quartz phase. Nevertheless, even at t = 24 h, the intensities of the LAS-related XRD peaks are still comparatively low, especially in relation to the broadened, main ZrO2 peak at 2θ = 30.1°. Thus, the XRD results as shown in Fig. 1 indicate the absence of any crystalline phase in the samples until a time of t  1.75 h is reached, where first signs of the appearance of crystalline ZrO2 can be seen. With ongoing heat treatment, the intensity of the ZrO2-related peaks increases, which is a clear sign for an increase of the quantity of crystalline ZrO2 within the samples. Finally, after t = 18 h, first LAS crystals occur in the sample – their quantity, however, is still quite low.

TEM results

In order to illustrate the results obtained by XRD, electron transparent specimens were prepared from samples crystallized at 725 °C for t = 0.25, 1.75 and 24 h.

Figure 2 shows TEM micrographs from a sample thermally treated for t = 0.25 h. In Fig. 2(a), the bright field micrograph clearly shows the occurrence of nanoscaled heterogeneities in the glass. These heterogeneities appear darker than the surrounding matrix, which indicates a larger density at these sample positions, as for TEM bright field microscopy, the direct electron beam is used for image formation, which is absorbed stronger in thicker or denser sample regions. However, these dense, nanoscaled inclusions within the glass matrix do not seem to be crystalline, since on the one hand, no lattice planes could be imaged at any of the analyzed sample positions. On the other hand, it was not possible to image these inclusions using TEM dark field imaging, which is a TEM imaging mode based on the use of diffracted electron beams for image formation: if a sample position is crystalline, and electron diffraction occurs due to the existence of a regular lattice plane arrangement in the crystals, this diffracted beam can be chosen for image formation using a selective aperture in the back focal plane of the TEM column. As it was not possible to image the dense inclusions that are present in the glass after t = 0.25 h that way, it may be concluded that these are indeed not crystalline, yet rather represent amorphous, liquid-liquid phase-separation droplets within the amorphous glass matrix. This finding is in agreement with the XRD patterns, which indicate the absence of any crystalline phases in the samples until t  1.75 h.

Figure 2
(a) TEM bright field micrograph, showing nanoscaled heterogeneities in the glass after t = 15 min at 725 °C. (b) TEM dark field micrograph of the sample sample area, showing no signs of crystallinity (c) TEM micrograph ...

Figure 3(a) and (b) show scanning TEM (STEM) micrographs of the same sample (t  1.75 h). As the image formation in STEM is based on inelastic scattering, in general it can be stated that dense or heavy sample positions appear brighter in the micrographs, and less-dense sample positions appear comparatively dark. Obviously, the STEM results clearly supply the TEM-based finding that dense, nanoscaled inclusions are dispersed throughout the glass matrix. As the STEM-EDX results in Fig. 3(c) show, these liquid-liquid phase-separation droplets are enriched in Zr, although Zr is still present within the surrounding matrix.

Figure 3
(a) STEM micrograph of a sample thermally treated at 725 °C for t = 0.25 h. (b) Detailed view of the inset shown in (a). (c) STEM-EDX spectra of different sample areas, as highlighted in (b).

After t = 1.75 h, according to the XRD results, the occurrence of ZrO2 crystals within the samples can be expected. Indeed, the TEM-based analysis of the nanostructure of a sample thermally treated for 1.75 h shows that the glass matrix incorporates nanocrystalline ZrO2 inclusions, as shown in Fig. 4. Based on software-based image processing36 of binarized dark field images, the average diameter of the ZrO2 crystals at this stage was determined as 3.4 ± 0.8 nm. On the other hand, according to these TEM results, it cannot be verified whether all of the dense inclusions within the glass matrix are already crystallized ZrO2, or if a number of these inclusions still resembles the state of liquid-liquid phase-separation droplets, which are evident especially at earlier stages of the temporal course of crystallization.

Figure 4
(a) TEM bright field micrograph of a LAS glass sample thermally treated at 725 °C for t = 1.75 h. (b) Same sample position: TEM dark field micrograph shows crystallinity of the nanoscaled inclusions. (c ...

Figure 5 shows STEM micrographs and STEM-EDX results from the same sample at t = 1.75 h. Obviously, Zr is enriched at the positions of the droplet-like dense inclusions, which either already are ZrO2 crystals, or still are Zr-rich phase-separation droplets. However, as seen in Fig. 5(e), not only Zr, yet also Al is enriched at the positions of the Zr-rich inclusions: the Al/Si ratio at the sample positions that contain these nanoscaled, Zr-rich droplets is clearly larger than at the Zr-depleted glass matrix area. Since Al is not incorporated within the ZrO2 crystal lattice, this is an indication for an Al-rich shell that surrounds the ZrO2 nanocrystals at this stage – or, if the dense, droplet-like inclusion is not yet crystallized, it indicates that Al is most likely enriched within the droplet, and pushed towards the outer rim by the growing ZrO2 crystals once the crystallization thereof starts.

Figure 5
(a) STEM micrograph of a sample that was thermally treated at 725 °C for t = 1.75 h. (bd) EDXS element distribution maps of the elements Al, Si and Zr, same sample area. (f) Red curve: accumulated EDX spectrum ...

Finally, after t = 24 h, according to XRD not only ZrO2, but also the LAS crystals should be present in the samples. Indeed, as seen in Fig. 6, TEM investigations of a sample from this nucleation stage show the occurrence of a few larger crystals with diameters of up to approximately 50 nm, as well as the expected dense network of ZrO2 nanocrystals. At this final stage, the average diameter of the ZrO2 nanocrystals is found to be 3.5 ± 0.7 nm. This means that the average size of the ZrO2 nanocrystals remains approximately constant all throughout the temporal course of crystallization, between the nucleation stage of the first appearance of crystalline ZrO2 at approximately t = 1.75 h and the final stage at t = 24 h, when first LAS crystals start to grow upon the ZrO2 nuclei.

Figure 6
TEM bright field micrographs of a LAS glass sample thermally treated at 725 °C for t = 24 h. (a,b) At low magnifications, the LAS crystals with comparatively low volume density and crystal diameters of up to approximately ...

Figure 7 shows STEM-EDX results of the same sample. Obviously, also after t = 24 h, an enrichment of Al close to the ZrO2 crystals appears.

Figure 7
STEM-EDX mapping of a LAS glass sample thermally treated at 725 °C for t = 24 h. The comparison of the images (a,b) shows the radiation damage of the sample especially in the matrix area after the STEM-EDX investigations ...

XANES results

In the XANES spectra, the intensity ratios of the doublet peaks of both the Zr L 2- and Zr L 3- edges are sensitive to the coordination number of Zr and can therefore be used to estimate the coordination number (CN) of Zr by means of spectral fingerprinting37. In Fig. 8, it is shown that if the respective spectra of the LAS green glass and that of the sample at the final stage (725 °C, t = 24 h) are compared to reference spectra of Zr-containing compounds in which the tetravalent Zr4+ ions are either sixfold coordinated ([6]Zr4+ in SrZrO3), or eightfold coordinated ([8]Zr4+ in t-ZrO2), it is obvious that within the amorphous green glass matrix, the homogeneously distributed tetravalent Zr ions are mainly 6-fold coordinated. At the final stage, on the other hand, the shape of the Zr L 2- and Zr L 3- edge spectra and the intensity ratio of the respective doublet peaks rather resemble the spectra of the t-ZrO2 reference, showing that at this stage, the incorporation of Zr4+ ions into ZrO2 nanocrystals is basically completed. Thus, it seems reasonable to state that after this final stage at t = 24 h, indeed all of the previous liquid-liquid phase-separation droplets have evolved into nanoscaled ZrO2 crystals.

Figure 8
Top left and right: Summarized results of the Zr L 2 and Zr L 3 XANE spectra of samples heat treated at 725 °C for t = 0.25–24 h, showing the gradual change of the respective edges peak shape. Bottom left ...

The gradual change of the intensity ratios of the Zr L-edges as a function of time is shown in Fig. 8 as well. This change of the spectral shape is a very sensible way to probe the gradual transition of the coordination of Zr4+ ions from [6]Zr4+ to [8]Zr4+ within the LAS samples during the temporal evolution of ZrO2 crystallization38. In ref. 26, an approach for the Ti L 2,3 XANES-based calculation of the degree of Ti4+ in crystalline environment in LAS glasses co-doped with ZrO2 and TiO2 is presented. In analogy, the degree of ZrO2 crystallization in the present study can be calculated as follows: at first, it has to be assumed that the crystallization of ZrO2 is finished after t = 24 h, meaning that all of the Zr that is present in the green glass composition is by then incorporated into nanocrystalline ZrO2. This assumption seems to be justified, since the Zr L 2 spectrum of the sample that was thermally treated for t = 24 h shows a comparable doublet peak intensity ratio as the ZrO2 powder reference (cf. Fig. 9). Additionally, as Fig. 5 shows, there is nearly no Zr left in the glass matrix already after t = 1.75 h. Thus, between t = 1.75 h and t = 24 h, the Zr is either present in already crystallized ZrO2, or in Zr-rich liquid-liquid phase separation droplets that gradually evolve into nanoscaled ZrO2 crystals. As there are signs of a starting LAS crystallization after t = 24 h, it is very likely that the previous nucleation of ZrO2 is finished by then. Following this assumption, the Zr L 2 spectrum of the t = 24 h sample is taken as [8]Zr4+ reference spectrum, since for the present case, it appears more realistic to use the spectrum of a sample that contains ZrO2 nanocrystals embedded in a LAS matrix, rather than to use the spectrum of a polycrystalline, pure ZrO2 powder reference. For every time step, the respective Zr L 2 spectrum is then simulated as a weighted linear superposition of a fraction α of the t = 24 h sample (that represents the final stage of ZrO2 crystallization, with only [8]Zr4+ present in ZrO2 nanocrystals) and a fraction (1-α) of the green glass spectrum (that represents the spectrum for [6]Zr4+ in amorphous environment, without any fraction of already crystallized ZrO2). The best fit for every time step is then determined by calculating the difference spectra of the α-dependent simulated spectra and the experimentally obtained spectra, and then by taking the sum of the squared difference spectra for all energies in the energy range of the Zr L 2 edge, i.e. from 2,290–2,330 eV. For every time step, the best-fit α value is determined by the minimum of the sum of the squared difference spectra. Figure 9 exemplifies the procedure for the case of the t = 1.75 h sample: as can be seen, a linear superposition of (0.51 * green-glass-spectrum) + (0.49 * 24 h-spectrum) resembles the experimentally gained Zr L 2 spectrum of the t = 1.75 h sample almost perfectly, with a residuum that is close to zero over the entire energy range. Thus, it can be concluded that the fraction α of [8]Zr4+, i.e. of Zr4+ ions that already are nucleated into nanoscaled ZrO2 crystals, is approximately 51% after t = 1.75 h, meaning that half of all Zr present in the glass composition has turned into ZrO2 after that stage, while 49% of the Zr ions are still in an amorphous, sixfold coordinated environment. Since Fig. 5 shows that basically no Zr is left in the residual glass matrix after t = 1.75 h, this means that half of the Zr within the sample, which is sixfold coordinated, is present in form of the Zr-enriched, liquid-liquid phase separation droplets that have not yet been transformed into crystalline ZrO2. In other words, it can be concluded that at this stage of crystallization, half of the Zr-enriched droplets that are visible using TEM (cf. Figs 4 and and5)5) are nanocrystalline ZrO2, and the other half is still consisting of not-yet crystallized, Zr-rich phase-separation droplets.

Figure 9
Schematic illustration of the linear combination of a weighted Zr L 2 spectrum of the sample thermally treated at t = 24 h at 725 °C (representative for [8]Zr4+ in fully crystalline environment) with that of a weighted ...

Figure 10(a) shows the degree of Zr crystallization α as function of time of thermal treatment of the LAS glass at 725 °C. Obviously, the extrema of this curve are α = 0 for the initial glass (bearing no crystalline ZrO2) and α = 1 for the sample that was thermally treated for 24 h, from which it is assumed that all Zr of the glass composition is by then fully incorporated in ZrO2 crystals. Following that approach, which is further detailed in a previous publication26, this temporal evolution of α can be approximated with the Avrami equation:

=1exp[(tτ)n]
1

with τ: characteristic time and n: Avrami coefficient, whose value, which may range between 1 and 4, is specific for the crystallization mechanism that is taking place. As suggested in refs 26 and 39, n can be determined by plotting α versus ln t (see Fig. 10(b)) and determining the intersection of the straight line with the maximum possible slope of the resulting graph with the lines of α = 0 and α = 1. In our case, these values are ln tα = 0 = 3.24, and ln tα = 1 = 6.12. With these values, n can be calculated as follows:

n=elnt=1lnt=2=0.94
2

Figure 10
Degree of ZrO2 crystallization α after different times t of at 725 °C in (a) linear and (b) logarithmic representation. From (b), the Avrami coefficient of n = 0.94  1 could be determined ...

This value for n close to n = 1 describes a barrier-limited crystal growth, where nucleation of ZrO2 is ever ongoing in the sample (as long as non-crystallized Zr is present), yet the newly formed crystals do not extend over a certain size as their growth stops at a barrier26, 4042. Most likely, this barrier is defined by the Al enrichment that has been found near the ZrO2 crystals and Zr-rich devitrification droplets: the diffusion of Zr towards the crystallizing ZrO2 areas is hampered by this Al barrier, which eventually leads to a stop of the expansion of the single ZrO2 crystals within the glass matrix. This finding explains why the crystal size distribution of the ZrO2 crystals within the LAS samples thermally treated at 725 °C for several time steps is quite narrow and does not notably increase with time: as mentioned before, the average size of the ZrO2 crystals is approximately 3.5 nm at every crystallization step. No Ostwald ripening that would eventually yield larger ZrO2 crystals at the late stages takes place, since the growth of nuclei is literally frozen by an Al-rich barrier that surrounds the nanoscaled ZrO2 crystals.

The formation of core-shell like structures as a prerequisite for a narrow crystal size distribution was first reported in ref. 43. for an oxyfluoride glass composition. In contrast to the present investigation, there, the core-shell structure was not formed from a phase-separated state, but from a homogeneous glass. During the formation of CaF2 crystals within these oxyfluoride glasses, a diffusion layer, depleted in calcium and fluoride, and enriched in silica, is formed. It was argued that this layer increases in viscosity during crystal growth until a viscosity of 1013 dPa·s is reached – the layer then has a glass transition temperature equal to the crystallization temperature and further crystal growth is no longer possible.

The first stages of LAS crystallization is very different from that in the magnesium alumosilicate system. In the latter, comparatively large ZrO2 crystals are formed which do not exhibit spherical or cuboid shape. The tiny ZrO2 crystals, also observed in the MAS system are formed at the growth front of quartz during onward crystallization44.

Conclusion

The present investigation reports on a glass ceramic of a selected chemical composition which is comparable to that of commercially available glass ceramic material Robax™. It was deliberately doped with ZrO2 as a single nucleating agent only, in order to nalyse the crystallization behaviour of this nucleating agent before subsequent LAS crystallization, especially in early stages of phase development.

At a given temperature of 725 °C, it was found that the crystallization of nanoscaled ZrO2 crystals with time takes place via the formation of Zr-rich liquid-liquid phase separation droplets, which eventually evolve into crystalline ZrO2. This transition is accompanied by a gradual change of the coordination of Zr4+ from sixfold (in the glass) to eightfold (in the ZrO2 crystals). It is found that the ZrO2 nanocrystals possess a narrow size distribution and do not notably increase their diameters over with time. This effect is linked to the occurrence of an Al-rich growth barrier that surrounds the ZrO2 crystals and most possibly prevents further diffusion of Zr ions from the glass toward the crystals, thereby freezing in their sizes to diameters of approximately 3.5 ± 0.7 nm, even at late stages.

The degree of crystallization at each stage t was determined, and from that, the Avrami coefficient was deduced to n  1, which describes a barrier-limited crystal growth and thus supports the assumption of the existence of an Al-rich growth barrier that surrounds the ZrO2 nanocrystals. It seems likely that the said barrier, whose chemical composition is strongly different from the green glass composition, enables ideal conditions for the subsequent crystallization of the LAS phases.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG), Bonn Bad Godesberg (Germany) via project nr. RU 417/16-1 (Christian Rüssel) and nr. HO1691/6-1 (Thomas Höche). The TEM sample preparation, accomplished by G. Möller (Jena) and A. Böbenroth (Halle) is gratefully acknowledged.

Author Contributions

Author Contributions

E.K. prepared the glasses and glass ceramics and performed the XRD investigations and the measurements of the thermal and mechanical properties. C.P. performed for the (S)TEM/EDX investigations. C.P., M.K. and Y.H. performed the XANES investigations. C.R. and T.H. were responsible for the coordination of the experiments. All authors reviewed the manuscript.

Notes

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

1. Pannhorst, W. Low thermal expansion glass ceramics (eds Bach, H. & Krause, D.) 1–130 (Springer, 2005).
2. Vogel, W. Glaschemie (ed. Vogel, W.) 332–343 (Springer, 1992).
3. Soares VO, Paula GR, Peitl O, Zanotto ED. Effect of ion exchange on the sinter- crystallisation of low expansion Li2O.Al2O3.SiO2 glass-ceramics. Glass Technol.: Eur. J. Glass Sci. Technol. A. 2011;52:50–54.
4. Müller G, Hoffmann M, Neeff R. Hydrogen substitution in lithium-aluminosilicates. J. Mater. Sci. 1988;23:1779–1785. doi: 10.1007/BF01115722. [Cross Ref]
5. Pillars WW, Peacor DR. The Crystal Structure of Beta Eucryptite as a Function of Temperature. Am. Mineral. 1973;58:681–690.
6. Petzoldt J. Metastable crystalline solutions with quartz structure in the oxide system lithium oxide-magnesium oxide-zinc oxide-aluminum oxide-silicon dioxide. Glastech. Ber. 1967;40:385–396.
7. Bocker C, Bhattacharyya S, Höche T, Rüssel C. Size distribution of BaF2 nanocrystallites in transparent glass ceramics. Acta Mater. 2009;57:5956–5963. doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2009.08.021. [Cross Ref]
8. Pannhorst, W. Transparent and Tinted Glass Ceramic for Household Appliances in Low thermal expansion glass ceramics (ed. Bach, H.) 60–78 (Springer, 1995).
9. Stookey SD. Catalyzed Crystallization of Glass in Theory and Practice. Ind. Eng. Chem. 1959;51:805–808. doi: 10.1021/ie50595a022. [Cross Ref]
10. Kondrat’ev, Y.N. Some peculiarities of the chemical bond in lithium aluminosilicate glasses. Stekloobraznoe Sostoyanie 344–348 (1965).
11. Doherty PE, Lee DW, Davis RS. Direct Observation of the Crystallization of Li2O-Al2O3-SiO2 Glasses Containing TiO2. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 1967;50:77–81. doi: 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1967.tb15043.x. [Cross Ref]
12. Vogel, W. Struktur und Kristallisation der Gläser (VEB Verlag für Grundstoffindustrie, 1965).
13. Höland W, Rheinberger V, Schweiger M. Control of nucleation in glass ceramics. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A. 2003;361:575–589. doi: 10.1098/rsta.2002.1152. [Cross Ref]
14. Schiffner U, Pannhorst W. Nucleation in a precursor glass for lithia-alumina-silica glass ceramic. Part 1. Nucleation kinetics. Glastech. Ber. 1987;60:211–221.
15. Schiffner U, Pannhorst W. Nucleation in a precursor glass for a lithia-alumina-silica glass ceramic. Part 2. Variation of the nucleating agent concentrations. Glastech. Ber. 1987;60:239–247.
16. Sack W, Scheidler H. Effects of the nucleating agents TiO2 and ZrO2 on crystal phases formed during development of glass-ceramics (pyroceram bodies) Glastech. Ber. 1966;39:126–130.
17. Wurth R, Munoz F, Müller M, Rüssel C. Crystal growth in a multicomponent lithia aluminosilicate glass. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2009;116:433–437. doi: 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2009.04.010. [Cross Ref]
18. Dressler M, Rüdinger B, Deubener J. Crystallization kinetics in a lithium alumosilicate glass using SnO2 and ZrO2 additives. J. Non-Cryst. Solids. 2014;389:60–65. doi: 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2014.02.008. [Cross Ref]
19. Kleebusch E, Patzig C, Höche T, Rüssel C. Effect of the Concentration of Nucleating Agents ZrO2 and TiO2 on the Crystallization of Li2O-Al2O3 Glass- an X-Ray Diffraction and TEM Investigation. J. Mater. Sci. 2016;51:10127–10138. doi: 10.1007/s10853-016-0241-9. [Cross Ref]
20. Golubkov VV, Dymshits OS, Zhilin AA, Chuvaeva TI. Kinetics of the Ostwald Ripening in Lithium Aluminosilicate Glasses Containing TiO2 and ZrO2. Glass Physics and Chemistry. 2000;26:38–48.
21. Alekseeva I, et al. Phase transformations in NiO and CoO doped magnesium aluminosilicate glasses nucleated by ZrO2. Glass Technology. 2005;46:187–191.
22. Dargaud O, et al. Structural role of Zr4+ as a nucleating agent in a MgO–Al2O3–SiO2 glass-ceramics: A combined XAS and HRTEM approach. J. Non-Cryst. Solids. 2010;356:2928–2934. doi: 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2010.05.104. [Cross Ref]
23. Dargaud O, et al. In Situ study of Nucleation of Zirconia in an MgO–Al2O3–SiO2 Glass. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2010;93:342–344. doi: 10.1111/j.1551-2916.2009.03409.x. [Cross Ref]
24. Fernandez-Martin C, et al. Nucleation and Growth of Nanocrystals in Glass-Ceramics: An In Situ SANS Perspective. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2012;95:1304–1312. doi: 10.1111/j.1551-2916.2012.05093.x. [Cross Ref]
25. Pannhorst W. Glass ceramics: state-of-the-art. J. Non-Cryst. Solids. 1997;219:198–204. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3093(97)00270-6. [Cross Ref]
26. Höche T, et al. ZrTiO4 crystallisation in nanosized liquid-liquid phase-separation droplets in glass - a quantitative XANES study. CrystEngComm. 2011;13:2550. doi: 10.1039/c0ce00716a. [Cross Ref]
27. Kleebusch E, Patzig C, Höche T, Rüssel C. Phase formation during crystallization of a Li2O-Al2O3-SiO2 glass with ZrO2 as nucleating agent - an X-ray diffraction and (S)TEM-study. Ceram. Int. 2017;43:9769–9777. doi: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2017.04.153. [Cross Ref]
28. Patzig C, Dittmer M, Gawronski A, Höche T, Rüssel C. Crystallization of ZrO2-nucleated MgO/Al2O3/SiO2 glasses - a TEM study. CrystEngComm. 2014;16:6578–6587. doi: 10.1039/C4CE00636D. [Cross Ref]
29. Gawronski A, Patzig C, Höche T, Rüssel C. High-strength glass-ceramics in the system MgO/Al2O3/SiO2/ZrO2/Y2O3 - microstructure and properties. CrystEngComm. 2013;15:6165–6176. doi: 10.1039/c3ce40335a. [Cross Ref]
30. Zdaniewski WDTA. and X-Ray Analysis Study of Nucleation and Crystallization of MgO-Al2O3-SiO2 lasses Containing ZrO2, TiO2, and CeO2. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 1975;58:163–169. doi: 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1975.tb11435.x. [Cross Ref]
31. Dittmer M, Müller M, Rüssel C. Self-organized nanocrystallinity in MgO-Al2O3-SiO2 glasses with ZrO2 as nucleating agent. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2010;124:1083–1088. doi: 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2010.08.037. [Cross Ref]
32. Dittmer M, Yamamoto CF, Bocker C, Rüssel C. Crystallization and mechanical properties of MgO/Al2O3/SiO2/ZrO2 glass-ceramics with and without the addition of yttria. Solid State Sci. 2011;13:2146–2153. doi: 10.1016/j.solidstatesciences.2011.09.005. [Cross Ref]
33. UNIFIT2014 Spectrum Processing, Analysis, and Presentation Software for Photoelectron Spectra (XPS) and X-ray Absorption Spectra (XAS). Unifit Scientific Software GmbH, Leipzig, Germany. URL http://www.unifit-software.de/downloads.htm (2017).
34. Höche T, Gerlach JW, Petsch T. Static-charging mitigation and contamination avoidance by selective carbon coating of TEM samples. Ultramicroscopy. 2006;106:981–985. doi: 10.1016/j.ultramic.2006.05.007. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
35. Chavoutier M, et al. Effect of TiO2 content on the crystallization and the color of (ZrO2,TiO2)-doped Li2O-Al2O3-SiO2 glasses. J. Non-Cryst. Solids. 2014;384:15–24. doi: 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2013.03.034. [Cross Ref]
36. Image J. Image Processing and Analysis in Java. National Institute of Health, Bethesda, USA. URL http://rsbweb.nih.gov/ij/ (2017).
37. Ikeno H, et al. Variation of Zr-L2;3 XANES in tetravalent zirconium oxides. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter. 2013;25:165505. [PubMed]
38. Patzig C, et al. Zr coordination change during crystallization of MgO-Al2O3-SiO2-ZrO2 glass ceramics. J. Non-Cryst. Solids. 2014;384:47–54. doi: 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2013.04.014. [Cross Ref]
39. Avramov I, Avramova K, Rüssel C. New Method to Analyze Data on Overall Crystallization Kinetics. J. Cryst. Growth. 2005;285:394–399. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2005.08.024. [Cross Ref]
40. Bhattacharyya S, et al. Direct Evidence of Al-Rich Layers around Nanosized ZrTiO4 in Glass: Putting the Role of Nucleation Agents in Perspective. Cryst. Growth Des. 2010;10:379–385. doi: 10.1021/cg9009898. [Cross Ref]
41. Avramov I. The role of stress on initial stages of crystal growth. J. Non-Cryst. Solids. 2008;354:4959–4961. doi: 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2008.07.011. [Cross Ref]
42. Tsakiris N, Agyrakis P, Avramov I, Bocker C, Rüssel C. Crystal growth model with stress development and relaxation. Europhys. Lett. 2010;89:18004. doi: 10.1209/0295-5075/89/18004. [Cross Ref]
43. Rüssel C. Nano-Crystallization of CaF2 from Na2O/K2O/CaO/CaF2/Al2O3/SiO2 Glasses. Chem. Mater. 2005;17:5843–5847. doi: 10.1021/cm051430x. [Cross Ref]
44. Dittmer M, Rüssel C. Colorless and high strength MgO/Al2O3/SiO2 glass-ceramic dental material using zirconia as nucleating agent. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. B. 2012;100:463–470. doi: 10.1002/jbm.b.31972. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group