PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of genannJournal InfoAuthorsPermissionsJournals.ASM.orggenomeA ArticleGenome Announcements
 
Genome Announc. 2017 September; 5(36): e00982-17.
Published online 2017 September 7. doi:  10.1128/genomeA.00982-17
PMCID: PMC5589544

Genome Sequence of Ralstonia pseudosolanacearum Strains with Compatible and Incompatible Interactions with the Major Tomato Resistance Source Hawaii 7996

ABSTRACT

We report here the complete genome sequences of two Ralstonia pseudosolanacearum strains, isolated from the warm northeast region of Brazil. They display divergent (compatible versus incompatible) interactions with the resistant tomato line Hawaii 7996. Polymorphisms were detected in a subset of effector genes that might be associated with these contrasting phenotypes.

GENOME ANNOUNCEMENT

Ralstonia pseudosolanacearum is a soilborne pathogen and one of the main causal agents of the bacterial wilt (BW) disease of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) and other crops (1). R. pseudosolanacearum is currently classified as a distinct species within the R. solanacearum complex, which comprises strains of phylotypes I and III (2,5). Although they are of putative exotic origin, R. pseudosolanacearum phylotype I isolates are currently disseminated in Brazil (north, northeast, and central regions) and infect mainly Solanaceae crops (tomato, peppers, eggplant, and scarlet eggplant) (6, 7).

In this study, two tomato-infecting R. pseudosolanacearum strains from the warm Brazilian northeast region were sequenced in order to analyze candidate genes associated with their divergent (compatible versus incompatible) interactions with the tomato line Hawaii 7996, which is the main breeding source of BW resistance in this vegetable crop (8, 9). Strain RS 476 (sequevar I-18 from Maranhão state) is characterized by its ability to induce severe BW symptoms on Hawaii 7996 (≈60% incidence), whereas strain CRMRs218 (also sequevar I-18 from Pernambuco state) is able to induce severe BW symptoms in a wide range of tomato cultivars, but it is avirulent to Hawaii 7996.

The genomic DNA was extracted using the DNeasy blood and tissue kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). The purified DNA quantification and quality analyses were done in a NanoDrop spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) and in a fluorometer. The two genomic samples were sequenced on one lane of a HiSeq 2500 instrument (Illumina) at the Centro de Biotecnologia Animal (Esalq/Usp, São Paulo, SP, Brazil), and libraries were prepared with the Nextera DNA sample prep kit (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA). Sequencing was performed with 100-bp paired-end reads, with genome coverages of ≈810× (RS 476) and ≈684× (CRMRs218). Quality control was done using FastQC (https://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc) in order to check Phred scores of the reads.

SeqMan NGen version 14 software (Lasergene, DNASTAR, Madison, WI, USA) was employed for genome assembly using R. pseudosolanacearum GMI1000 as the reference strain (GenBank assembly accession number GCA_000009125.1). The complete genomes of the two contrasting Brazilian strains were annotated in the NCBI Prokaryotic Annotation Pipeline (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genome/annotation_prok). Each consisted of two replicons, circular chromosomes of 3,716,855 bp for RS 476 and 3,720,116 bp for CRMRs218 and megaplasmids of 2,094,715 bp for RS 476 and 2,095,997 bp for CRMRs218.

The annotated genomes of RS 476 and CRMRs218 consisted, respectively, of 5,206 and 5,216 genes, 5,133 and 5,144 coding sequences, 5,000 and 4,882 protein-coding genes, 133 and 262 pseudogenes, 4 and 3 noncoding RNAs, and GC contents of 66.95% and 66.71%. These two strains presented three structural RNAs (5S, 16S, and 23S) and 57 tRNAs. Mutations (single-nucleotide polymorphisms and indels) were detected in a subset of effector genes that might be associated with these contrasting phenotypes, which will demand additional comparative genomic studies.

Accession number(s).

The genome sequences (chromosomes and megaplasmids) reported here have been deposited in NCBI GenBank under the accession numbers CP021762 and CP021763 for the chromosome and plasmid, respectively, of strain RS 476 and CP021764 and CP021765 for the chromosome and plasmid, respectively, of strain CRMRs218.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was financially supported by the Consortium Embrapa Vegetable Crops/UFRPE and by the Embrapa/Agrocinco Project (21200.11/0021-7).

Greecy M. R. Albuquerque received a doctoral scholarship in plant pathology (at UFRPE) from CNPq (140935/2013-4).

Footnotes

Citation Albuquerque GMR, Souza EB, Silva AMF, Lopes CA, Boiteux LS, Fonseca MEDN. 2017. Genome sequence of Ralstonia pseudosolanacearum strains with compatible and incompatible interactions with the major tomato resistance source Hawaii 7996. Genome Announc 5:e00982-17. https://doi.org/10.1128/genomeA.00982-17.

REFERENCES

1. Jones JB, Jones JP, Stall RE, Zitter TA 1991. Compendium of tomato diseases. APS Publishing, New York, NY.
2. Safni I, Cleenwerck I, De Vos P, Fegan M, Sly L, Kappler U 2014. Polyphasic taxonomic revision of the Ralstonia solanacearum species complex: proposal to emend the descriptions of Ralstonia solanacearum and Ralstonia syzygii and reclassify current R. syzygii strains as Ralstonia syzygii subsp. syzygii subsp. nov., R. solanacearum phylotype IV strains as Ralstonia syzygii subsp. indonesiensis subsp. nov., banana blood disease bacterium strains as Ralstonia syzygii subsp. celebesensis subsp. nov. and R. solanacearum phylotype I and III strains as Ralstonia pseudosolanacearum sp. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 64:3087–3103. doi:.10.1099/ijs.0.066712-0 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
3. Prior P, Ailloud F, Dalsing BL, Remenant B, Sanchez B, Allen C 2016. Genomic and proteomic evidence supporting the division of the plant pathogen Ralstonia solanacearum into three species. BMC Genomics 17:90. doi:.10.1186/s12864-016-2413-z [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
4. Zhang Y, Qiu S 2016. Phylogenomic analysis of the genus Ralstonia based on 686 single-copy genes. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 109:71–82. doi:.10.1007/s10482-015-0610-4 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
5. Fegan M, Prior P 2005. How complex is the Ralstonia solanacearum species complex? p 449–461. In Allen C, Prior P, Hayward AC (ed), Bacterial wilt disease and the Ralstonia solanacearum species complex, 1st ed, vol 1 APS Publishing, Saint Paul, MN.
6. Garcia AL, Lima WG, Souza EB, Michereff SJ, Mariano RLR 2013. Characterization of Ralstonia solanacearum causing bacterial wilt in bell pepper in the state of Pernambuco, Brazil. J Plant Pathol 95:237–245. doi:.10.4454/JPP.V95I2.032 [Cross Ref]
7. Santiago TR, Lopes CA, Caetano-Anollés G, Mizubuti ESG 2017. Phylotype and sequevar variability of Ralstonia solanacearum in Brazil, an ancient centre of diversity of the pathogen. Plant Pathol 66:383–392. doi:.10.1111/ppa.12586 [Cross Ref]
8. Lopes CA, Boiteux LS, Eschemback V 2015. Eficácia relativa de porta—enxertos comerciais de tomateiro no controle da murcha-bacteriana. Hortic Bras 33:125–130. doi:.10.1590/S0102-053620150000100020 [Cross Ref]
9. Lebeau A, Daunay MC, Frary A, Palloix A, Wang JF, Dintinger J, Chiroleu F, Wicker E, Prior P 2011. Bacterial wilt resistance in tomato, pepper, and eggplant: genetic resources respond to diverse strains in the Ralstonia solanacearum species complex. Phytopathology 101:154–165. doi:.10.1094/PHYTO-02-10-0048 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]

Articles from Genome Announcements are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)