Search tips
Search criteria 


Logo of nanoreslettspringer open web sitethis articlemanuscript submissionregistrationjournal front pagespringer open web site
Nanoscale Res Lett. 2017; 12: 526.
Published online 2017 September 6. doi:  10.1186/s11671-017-2297-0
PMCID: PMC5585121

Visible Light-Driven Photocatalytic Performance of N-Doped ZnO/g-C3N4 Nanocomposites


N-doped ZnO/g-C3N4 composites have been successfully prepared via a facile and cost-effective sol-gel method. The nanocomposites were systematically characterized by XRD, FE-SEM, HRTEM, FT-IR, XPS, and UV-vis DRS. The results indicated that compared with the pure N-doped ZnO, the absorption edge of binary N-doped ZnO/g-C3N4 shifted to a lower energy with increasing the visible-light absorption and improving the charge separation efficiency, which would enhance its photocatalytic activity. Compared with the pure g-C3N4, ZnO, N-doped ZnO and the composite ZnO/g-C3N4, the as-prepared N-doped ZnO/g-C3N4 exhibits a greatly enhanced photocatalytic degradation of methylene blue and phenol under visible-light irradiation. Meanwhile, N-doped ZnO/g-C3N4 possesses a high stability. Finally, a proposed mechanism for N-doped ZnO/g-C3N4 is also discussed. The improved photocatalysis can be attributed to the synergistic effect between N-doped ZnO and g-C3N4, including the energy band structure and enhanced charge separation efficiency.

Keywords: N-doped ZnO, g-C3N4, Composite, Visible-light irradiation, Photocatalytic degradation


Photocatalytic degradation of the organic compounds using solar energy as the energy source has attracted considerable interest for the environmental protection [13]. As is known, ZnO is one kind of the important semiconductor photocatalysts because of its unique advantages, such as its low price, high photocatalytic activity, and nontoxicity [4, 5]. However, the disadvantages such as low charge separation efficiency, susceptibility to photocorrosion, and poor visible light absorbance limited its widely commercial applications [6, 7]. Doping with the metal and/or nonmetal ions, coupling with other semiconductors, and surface sensitization with metal complexes could be considered as the feasible approaches to improve its utilization of solar energy and charge separation efficiency [7, 8]. It is reported that the nonmetal element N doping effectively improved the light absorption of ZnO in the visible range [9]. The nitrogen atom is closest in the atomic size and electronegativity to oxygen atom [10], so N doping could result in the minimum strain in ZnO. Regrettably, that N-doped ZnO does not exhibit excellent photocatalytic efficiency unlike N-doped TiO2 [11].

Graphitic carbon nitride (g-C3N4) is a relatively novel, versatile, and promising metal-free polymeric semiconductor photocatalyst [1214], due to its special semiconducting properties and low cost. It has been widely investigated for its great potential in degrading environmental pollutants [12], catalyzing water splitting for H2 evolution [13], and reducing carbon dioxide [14] under irradiation. However, the easy recombination of its photogenerated charges restricts its photocatalytic performance and greatly limits its wide practical application [15]. Constructing a suitable heterojunctional composite is one of the most general methods to improve the photogenerated charge separation [1618]. Coupling g-C3N4 with ZnO could yield an excellent heterostructure, since these two semiconductors have well-matched, overlapping band structures [6]. Under visible light irradiation, the initial electron excited from the valence band (VB) can transfer to the conduction band (CB) of the g-C3N4, then further transfer to the CB of ZnO [6, 8, 19], resulting in an improved photocatalytic activity of ZnO/g-C3N4. Recently, Shanker et al. [10] reported that N-doped ZnO/g-C3N4 hybrid core–shell shows a greatly enhanced visible-light photocatalysis for the degradation of rhodamine B. However, to the best of our knowledge, there are no works reported about N-doped ZnO/g-C3N4 for the visible-light degradation of the volatile organic pollutants such as phenol and methylene blue (MB) until now.

In this work, the N-doped ZnO/g-C3N4 composite photocatalysts were synthesized via the sol-gel method. The as-prepared composite exhibited significantly enhanced photocatalytic degradation of MB and phenol under visible-light irradiation. Finally, the possible mechanism about the photocatalytic degradation of MB and phenol was also investigated.


Preparation of N-Doped ZnO/g-C3N4 Nanocomposites

g-C3N4 powder was prepared by heating melamine [20]. In brief, 5 g of melamine was placed in an alumina crucible with a cover that was firstly heated to 80 °C, followed by calcining at 550 °C for 4 h in a muffle furnace. After natural cooling to room temperature, the obtained sample was milled into powder. Then, g-C3N4 powder was ultrasonicated in water and centrifuged to remove the unexfoliated g-C3N4.

In order to prepare the sol of N-doped ZnO, the equal mole of zinc acetate and urea were dissolved in ethanol [10, 21]. An appropriate amount of g-C3N4 was added to the above solution with continuous stirring. The solution was then kept at 80 °C water bath for 5 h. After that, the resultant mixture was dried and heated at 400 °C for 1 h to obtain N-doped ZnO/g-C3N4 loaded with 50 mol% N-doped ZnO, which is marked as N-ZnO/g-C3N4.

The sol for synthesizing ZnO was prepared by using above method without adding any urea. Then, the ZnO/g-C3N4 nanocomposites loaded with 50 mol% ZnO were prepared under the same experimental conditions, except for calcining in air.


X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns were carried out on a Rigaku D/max 2000 diffractometer employing Cu Kα radiation. The morphology and microstructure of the samples were examined by a field-emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM; Ultra 55, Zeiss) and high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM; Tecnai G2 F20 S-Twin, FEI). Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectra were recorded on a Nicolet Nexus-870 infrared spectroscopy (Thermo Nicolet) in the range of 400–4000 cm−1 using KBr pellets. Chemical compositions of the particle samples were analyzed by an X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS; Thermo Fisher K-Alpha) with Al Kα radiation, and all the spectra were calibrated by assigning the peak at 284.6 eV. The Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) surface area was estimated by a surface area apparatus (TriStar-3000, Micromeritics). UV-vis diffuse reflectance spectra (UV-vis DRS) were recorded by a UV-vis spectrophotometer (UV-3600, Shimadzu) equipped with an integrating sphere in the range of 200–800 nm, and BaSO4 was used as a reference.

Photocatalytic Activity

The photocatalytic activity of the as-prepared photocatalysts was evaluated via the degradation of MB and phenol in aqueous solution. A solar simulator (300 W Xe lamp) with a 420 nm cutoff filter provides the visible-light irradiation with the light intensity of 120 mW/cm2. The catalyst (0.5 g/L for MB and 5 g/L for phenol) and 100 ml of aqueous solution containing 10 mg/L MB (or 5 mg/L phenol) were placed in a glass reactor with continuous stirring at 250 rpm. Prior to irradiation, the pollutant solutions suspended with photocatalysts were stirred in the absence of light for 30 min to attain the equilibrium adsorption/desorption between photocatalyst powders and MB/phenol. During the reaction, the temperature was maintained at 25 ± 1 °C. For each given irradiation time, about 3 mL of the reacted solution was withdrawn and centrifuged at 12,000 rpm for 30 min to remove the photocatalyst. Then, the concentration of the centrifuged solution was determined by a UV-vis-NIR spectrophotometer (UV-3600, Shimadzu) with the maximum absorption of MB and phenol at 664 m and 270 nm, respectively). After visible-light irradiation, the photocatalysts were collected, washed, and dried at 100 °C for 12 h. The stability of the photocatalysts was checked by running four separate cycles. The total organic carbon (TOC) was determined using a Shimadzu TOC-2000 analyzer. For exploring the active species during the photocatalytic reaction, the effect of various scavengers on the degradation of dye was investigated. The method was similar to the former photocatalytic activity test under visible-light irradiation.

Results and Discussion

Figure 1 shows XRD patterns of g-C3N4, ZnO, N-ZnO ZnO/g-C3N4, and N-ZnO/g-C3N4 composites. The main characteristic peaks can be indexed as the hexagonal ZnO with wurtzite structure (JPCDS 36-1451). A strong peak at 27.5°, corresponding to the characteristic diffraction peak (002) of g-C3N4 [10, 22], can be also observed. Hence, we can conclude that the introduction of nitrogen does not change the crystal structure of ZnO. Moreover, as presented in Fig. 1b, the diffraction peaks for N-ZnO in N-ZnO/g-C3N4 have a slight red shift, as compared with those for ZnO in ZnO/g-C3N4, indicating an overall contraction of the lattice parameters [10]. The crystallite size of N-ZnO (38.6 nm) derived from the Scherer formula is smaller than that of ZnO (45.8 nm). This may be ascribed to the N doping which can inhibit the growth of ZnO [21]. After doping with N, the diffraction peak is obviously broader than that of ZnO (Fig. 1b), due to its low crystallinity that resulted from the introduction of N into the crystal lattice of ZnO. The values of specific surface area are 15.3 and 18.5 m2/g for ZnO/g-C3N4 and N-ZnO/g-C3N4, respectively. By comparison of the pure ZnO and N-ZnO, the BET surface areas of the composites are greatly increased. The increase of BET surface area indicates that the separation and migration efficiency of the photogenerated carriers would be improved, which could be in favor to the photocatalytic activity of composite.

Fig. 1
XRD patterns (a) of g-C3N4, ZnO/g-C3N4 and N-ZnO/g-C3N4 and the Bragg angle shift (b) of ZnO and N-ZnO in corresponding composites

The morphology and microstructure of as-prepared photocatalysts were analyzed by TEM and SEM. As shown in Fig. 2a, pure g-C3N4 exhibits the sheet-like morphology with the fluffy structure. Figure 2b, c shows the SEM images of ZnO and N-doped ZnO samples, respectively. As compared with pure ZnO, the N-doped ZnO shows smaller crystallite size with a relatively uniform diameter, which is in agreement with the results calculated using the Scherrer formula based on the XRD data. Moreover, the morphologies of ZnO/g-C3N4 and N-ZnO/g-C3N4 composite photocatalysts are evidently different from those of g-C3N4. Obviously, the ZnO and N-ZnO nanoparticles in ZnO/g-C3N4 and N-ZnO/g-C3N4 are dispersed over the composite surface, respectively (Fig. (Fig.2d,2d, e). The uniform distribution of nanoparticles on g-C3N4 could minimize the aggregation of ZnO and N-ZnO, and maximize the reactive sites, which could be in favor of the photocatalytic reactions [7]. Unlike ZnO/g-C3N4, it can be found that the surface of N-ZnO/g-C3N4 is obviously rough, and it can be attributed to the N-ZnO particles which have been assembled uniformly on the surface of N-ZnO/g-C3N4 during the heating treatment.

Fig. 2
SEM images of a pure g-C3N4, b ZnO, c N-ZnO, d ZnO/g-C3N4, and e N-ZnO/g-C3N4

The corresponding TEM images in Fig. 3 likewise indicate that the properly heterostructured composite exists, where N-ZnO nanospheres on the surface of N-ZnO/g-C3N4 are well attached to the g-C3N4. Figure 3b, c shows the HRTEM images of N-ZnO/g-C3N4. The measured lattice-fringes spacing of 3.25 and 2.43 Å are in well agreement with the crystal planes (002) and (101) of g-C3N4 and N-ZnO, respectively.

Fig. 3
TEM images of N-ZnO/g-C3N4

Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectra of the g-C3N4, ZnO, N-ZnO, and the composite materials are shown in Fig. 4. For ZnO and N-doped ZnO, the peaks in the region from 400 to 560 cm−1 is corresponding to the bending vibrations of Zn–O bands [6, 10], which were observed in all of the samples except for g-C3N4. In the spectrum of g-C3N4, the peaks at 1243 and 1637 cm−1 correspond to the stretching vibrations of C−N and C=N, respectively [10]. The peaks at 810 cm−1 originate from the breathing mode of the s-triazine ring units [23, 24]. The broad absorption band at a high wave number around 3100–3400 cm−1 is attributed to the stretching vibration of N−H bonds in the −NH2 and/or =N−H amines, as well as the hydroxyl groups of the chemisorbed and/or physisorbed H2O molecules [10, 23]. It can be clearly seen that the main characteristic IR peaks of g-C3N4 exist in the ZnO/g-C3N4 and N-ZnO/g-C3N4 composites, suggesting that the structural features of g-C3N4 are maintained after the hybridization process, in good agreement with the XRD results. Additionally, the main characteristic peaks of g-C3N4 in the composites slightly shift to a high wave number. This red shift could be attributed to the fact that the extendedly conjugated system appears in the heterostructured composites [10, 25].

Fig. 4
FT-IR spectra of g-C3N4, ZnO, N-ZnO, ZnO/g-C3N4, and N-ZnO/g-C3N4

Figure 5 shows XPS spectra of N-ZnO/g-C3N4. Two peaks at 1021.8 and 1044.9 eV in Fig. 5a are attributed to Zn 2p3/2 and 2p1/2, respectively. The O 1s peak is fitted with the non-linear least square fit program using Gauss–Lorentzian peak shapes. After deconvolution, there are two fitted peaks located at 530.4 and 532.0 eV. The peak at 530.4 eV can be assigned to the O2− ions in ZnO [26]. The other peak of 532.0 eV can be attributed to the chemically absorptive oxygen and/or hydroxyl group [26] on the surface of the composite photocatalyst. The C1s spectrum (Fig. 5c) of N-ZnO/g-C3N4 can also be fitted into three peaks, corresponding to three basic kinds of C states. The binding energy of 284.6 eV is attributed to the adventitious carbon (C−C) on the surface of N-doped ZnO/g-C3N4 [3, 6]. The C1s peaks at 286.5 and 287.8 eV are assigned to the sp3- and sp2-bonded carbon in N−C=N of the composite, respectively. With regard to the N1s spectrum of g-C3N4, there are three peaks after deconvolution, indicating three different kinds of N states [27, 28], the pyridinic N (C−N−C) at 398.5 eV, pyrrolic N (N−[C]3) at 399.8 eV, and graphitic N (C−NH) at 401.0 eV. Above the three kinds of N states are the basic units of g-C3N4. In the N1s spectrum (Fig. 5d), the peaks at binding energies of 397.5 and 398.6 eV can be assigned to the anionic N in O−Zn−N linkage [29] and sp2-hybridized N [28]. Here, we can conclude that the framework of g-C3N4 is not changed even if it has been combined with N-ZnO particles. Additionally, the results of XRD, FT-IR, and XPS confirm that there are both N-doped ZnO and g-C3N4 species in the heterojunction structure.

Fig. 5
XPS spectra of N 1s for N-ZnO/g-C3N4: a Zn 2p, b O 1s, c C 1s, and d N 1s

The UV-visible diffuse reflectance spectra of the prepared powder samples were also measured with a pressed BaSO4 as a reference. The resulting data is plotted as the remission function shown in Eq. 1.

F(R) = (1−R)2/2R

where R is the diffuse reflectance based on the Kubelka–Monk theory. The band gap energies (E g) of the direct bandgap semiconductor were estimated from the Eq. 2 by extrapolating the linear part.

(F(R)⋅hv)2A(hv − Eg)

where A is the absorption constants decided by the direct bandgap semiconductor of pure g-C3N4, ZnO, N-ZnO, the nanocomposite ZnO/g-C3N4, and N-ZnO/g-C3N4. Figure 6 shows the UV-vis absorption spectra of the as-prepared samples. It can be obviously seen that the absorption edge of the pure g-C3N4 is around 470 nm [6], corresponding to a band gap of 2.63 eV. As shown in Fig. 6, ZnO has a clear absorption edge around 390 nm in the UV range. Compared with the pure ZnO, an obvious red shift of the absorption edge towards higher a wavelength is detected in the N-ZnO sample, due to the contribution of nitrogen to the top of the valence band (VB) of ZnO which can drive the absorption of N-doped ZnO close to the visible region [10]. Thus, the band gap of ZnO is reduced from 3.21 to 3.10 eV after nitrogen doping. Another significant change is the enhanced absorption in the visible-light region ranged from 400 to 600 nm for the ZnO/g-C3N4 and N-ZnO/g-C3N4, compared with the pure ZnO and N-ZnO. It can be attributed to the effective surface hybridization [6, 30] between g-C3N4 and ZnO (N-doped ZnO) on its surface. Further, N-ZnO/g-C3N4 (2.73 eV) show the broader absorption edge in the visible region, as compared with ZnO/g-C3N4 (2.85 eV), which is in favor of the photodegradation of dyes under visible-light irradiation.

Fig. 6
UV-visible absorption spectra of g-C3N4, ZnO, N-ZnO, ZnO/g-C3N4, and N-ZnO/g-C3N4

The conduction band (CB) and valence band (VB) edges of g-C3N4 and ZnO locate approximately at − 1.3 eV/+ 1.4 eV and − 0.5 eV/+ 2.7 eV vs. NHE [6, 8, 31], respectively. For N-ZnO, the edge potentials of VB and CB can be determined by using the following equation [32].

EVBX − Ee + 0.5Eg


where E VB, X, and E e are the edge potential of the valence band, the absolute electronegativity of the semiconductor which is determined by the geometric mean of the electronegativity of the constituent atoms, and the energy of the free electron on the hydrogen scale (~ 4.5 eV), respectively [10, 24]. The E VB and E CB of N-doped ZnO are calculated to be 2.65 and − 0.45 eV, respectively.

Figure 7 shows the photocatalytic degradation of MB by using the prepared photocatalysts under the visible-light irradiation. Each sample performs a low adsorption capacity of MB. Almost no degradation of MB is observed in the absence of visible light or catalyst, demonstrating that MB is stable under the above conditions. As shown in Fig. 7a, after N doping, the photocatalytic stability of N-ZnO is improved, indicating that the introduction of N doping can suppress the recombination of photogenerated charge carriers. Meanwhile, the photocatalytic activities of ZnO/g-C3N4 and N-ZnO/g-C3N4 composite catalysts are obviously higher than those of the pure reference samples. The improved photocatalytic activity is attributed to the heterostructure of composites, which can promote the photogenerated electron transfer and suppress the recombination of the electron–hole pairs [7, 33]. Moreover, the N-ZnO/g-C3N4 catalyst exhibit higher photocatalytic activity than ZnO/g-C3N4, in spite of ZnO/g-C3N4 heterostructure. It can be owed to its improved absorption in the visible region to produce the electron–hole pairs and narrower band gap energy. The experimental results were fitted to the pseudo-first-order kinetics. At low initial pollutant concentration, the constant rate k was given by Eq. 5.

lnC/C0 = −kt

Fig. 7
a Photocatalytic degradation of MB by using ZnO, N-ZnO, g-C3N4, ZnO/g-C3N4, and N-ZnO/g-C3N4 catalysts under visible-light irradiation, b the corresponding ln (C/C 0) vs. time curves, c the rate constants of MB photodegradation, and d five cycles of ...

Here, k and t represent the first-order rate constant (h−1) and the irradiation time (h), respectively. C 0 is the initial concentration of MB, and C is the concentration at a reaction time of t. The corresponding plots of ln (C 0/C) vs. the irradiation time for photodegradation of MB are shown in Fig. 7b. A linear relation between ln (C 0/C) and the irradiation time has verified that the photodegradation of MB follows the first-order kinetics. The calculated first-order rate constants (k) are presented in Fig. 7c. The kinetic constant of N-ZnO/g-C3N4 is 1.794 h−1, which is 5.68, 3.85, and 1.91 times higher than those of N-ZnO (0.316 h−1), g-C3N4 (0.466 h−1), and ZnO/g-C3N4 (0.937 h−1). Apparently, N-ZnO/g-C3N4 exhibits the highest degradation efficiency of MB among all of the catalysts. In order to evaluate the stability of photocatalyst, the recyclic experiments about the photodegradated MB are performed with the N-ZnO/g-C3N4 catalyst. As shown in Fig. 7d, the photocatalytic activity of N-ZnO/g-C3N4 exhibits an extremely limited decline. The degradation efficiency of MB solution is nearly 90% after 100 min even at the fifth recycling experiment.

Phenol was also adopted as a representative recalcitrant pollutant to evaluate the photocatalytic performance of catalysts under visible-light irradiation, and the results are showed in Fig. 8. The photocatalytic degradation rates are expressed by Eq. 5, where C is the temporal concentration of phenol after irradiation, and C 0 is the concentration after adsorption process. Among all of the catalysts, N-ZnO/g-C3N4 presents the highest photodegradation efficiency of phenol. Based on the corresponding plots (Fig. 8b) of ln (C 0/C) vs. the irradiation time, the kinetic constants of g-C3N4, ZnO/g-C3N4, and N-ZnO/g-C3N4 are 0.013, 0.026, and 0.034 h−1, respectively. More importantly, N-ZnO/g-C3N4 exhibits excellent cycling stability (Fig. 8d) for phenol removal. The above results further confirm that the N-ZnO/g-C3N4 catalyst performs excellent photodegradation ability of both MB and phenol, because of its smaller band gap and broader absorption edge in the visible region compared with that of ZnO/g-C3N4.

Fig. 8
a Photocatalytic degradation of phenol by using g-C3N4, ZnO/g-C3N4 and N-ZnO/g-C3N4 catalysts under visible-light irradiation, b the corresponding first-order kinetic plots and c the rate constants of phenol degradation, and d degradation efficiency ...

By measuring the total organic carbon (TOC), the photocatalytic mineralization of the N-ZnO/g-C3N4 was carried out by degradation of MB and phenol in an aqueous solution under visible light irradiation. Figure 9 shows the TOC removal efficiency of MB and phenol as a function of reaction time. As shown in Fig. 9a, MB was degraded completely after 120 min, and the TOC removal rate reaches 93%. During the photodegradation process, MB was degraded to several intermediates, which may be the cleavage of one or more methyl groups substituent on the amine groups [34], and finally completely degraded to CO2 and H2O. By comparison, the mineralization of phenol only reached 18%. The main intermediates include hydroquinone (HQ), p-benzoquinone (p-BQ), 1, 3-dihydroxybenzene (DB), maleic anhydride (MA), and other low fatty acids (LFAs) [35, 36]. HQ and p-BQ can be easily oxidized into other intermediates or inorganic carbon. MA and LFA in the reaction system are difficult to be further oxidated and mineralized.

Fig. 9
TOC removal of a MB and b phenol degradation by N-ZnO/g-C3N4 photocatalyst

In the photocatalytic degradation of organic pollutants, there are series of photogenerated reactive species such as hole (h+), hydroxyl radicals (•OH), and superoxide anions (O2 •−). In order to understand how the different reactive species play a role in the photodegradation process, the different scavengers were used to detect the active species during the photocatalytic degradation process. Here, EDTA, isopropyl alcohol (IPA), and benzoquinone (BQ) were adopted as hole (h+), hydroxyl radical (•OH), and superoxide anion (O2 •−) scavengers at a concentration of 1.0 mM, respectively. Through the photocatalytic experiments, the N-ZnO/g-C3N4 composite exhibited the best degradation for the MB solution. So, the MB solution was chosen for the scavenging experiments. As shown in Fig. 10, an obvious decrease in the photocatalytic activity was also observed by the addition of EDTA and BQ, respectively, suggesting that both h+ and O2 •− play an important role in the photocatalytic reaction. Meanwhile, the photocatalytic degradation of MB was greatly suppressed by the addition of IPA, indicating that the hydroxyl radicals (•OH) are the main active species and play a dominant role in the photocatalytic reaction.

Fig. 10
Effect of various scavengers on the degradation of MB over the N-ZnO/g-C3N4 catalyst

The schematic illustration of the charge transfer and photocatalytic mechanism for the N-ZnO/g-C3N4 composite photocatalyst is shown in Fig. 11. Under the visible-light irradiation, the electron–hole pairs in the g-C3N4 and N-ZnO forms. And then, the excited-state electrons transport from the VB to the CB. Thus, the conduction-band electron and the valence-band hole separate on the surface of the catalyst. The photogenerated electrons transfer from the CB of g-C3N4 to the CB of N-ZnO due to the CB potential of g-C3N4 that is more negative than the CB edge of N-ZnO, so the separation efficiency of the electron–hole pair is enhanced [10]. The CB potential of N-doped ZnO (−0.45 eV vs. NHE) is below the standard redox potential E 0(O2/O2 ) (−0.33 eV vs. NHE). So the photogenerated electrons in the CB of N-doped ZnO would subsequently react with the dissolved O2 to form the high oxidative hydroxyl radicals, which could oxidize the pollutants [5]. In addition, the photo-induced electrons have more negative potential to reduce the molecular oxygen to yield superoxide anion (O2 •−), which then induces the degradation of organic pollutants. According to the previous reports [6, 30], the photo-excited holes on the VB of N-ZnO could transfer to the VB of g-C3N4. However, the photo-induced holes of g-C3N4 cannot oxidize the adsorbed H2O molecules to yield the hydroxyl radicals because the VB potential of g-C3N4 (+1.4 eV vs. NHE) is smaller than the standard redox potential E0(H2O/OH·) (+2.4 eV vs. NHE) [7, 10]. Based on the above discussion, the majority holes at the VB of N-ZnO do not transfer to the VB of g-C3N4. These photo-excited holes can directly oxidate the organic dye to obtain the reactive intermediates [5] and/or react with the H2O to form the hydroxyl radicals [2], which are the main reactive species in the photocatalytic reaction. Therefore, we propose that the N-ZnO/g-C3N4 heterojunction structure can enhance the separation of electron–hole pairs and reduce the recombination of charge carriers, leading to the increase of the photodegradation process.

Fig. 11
Schematic illustration of the band edge positions and proposed photocatalytic mechanism for the N-ZnO/g-C3N4 composite catalyst


In summary, N-ZnO/g-C3N4 composite photocatalyst was successfully prepared via a facile sol-gel method. The addition of g-C3N4 enhances the light absorption in the visible region, generates more charge carriers, and simultaneously promotes the electron and hole segregation and migration. As compared with ZnO/g-C3N4, the N-ZnO/g-C3N4 shows higher photocatalytic activity on the degradation of MB and phenol, due to its improved absorption in the visible region and narrower band gap energy. The mechanism of the photocatalysis is analyzed, and the stability is also evaluated by recycling photocatalytic ability.


This project is supported by the Natural Science Foundation of China and Jiangsu Province (51571111, BK2016230, and BK20170645) and a grant from the State Key Program for Basic Research of China (2015CB921203). We would like to acknowledge them for the financial support.

Authors’ Contributions

Authors’ Contributions

JZK designed the experiments and carried the photocatalytic activity tests. HFZ, WZ, SSW, ML, XRZ, and HL carried out the sample characterization including XRD, IR, XPS, SEM, and TEM. ADL and DW participated in the discussion of photocatalytic mechanism and helped to draft the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.


Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.


1. Kong JZ, Li AD, Zhai HF, Li H, Yan QY, Ma J, Wu D. Preparation, characterization and photocatalytic properties of ZnTiO3 powders. J Hazard Mater. 2009;171:918–923. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.06.092. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
2. He Y, Wang Y, Zhang L, Teng B, Fan M (2015) High-efficiency conversion of CO2 to fuel over ZnO/g-C3N4 photocatalyst. Appl Catal B:168–169 1−8
3. Zhang J, Huang LH, Lu ZD, Jin ZL, Wang XY, Xu GL, Zhang EP, Wang HB, Kong Z, Xi JH, Ji ZG. Crystal face regulating MoS2/TiO2(001) heterostructure for high photocatalytic activity. J Alloys Compd. 2016;688:840–848. doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.07.263. [Cross Ref]
4. Chen XQ, Wu ZS, Liu DD, Gao ZZ. Preparation of ZnO photocatalyst for the efficient and rapid photocatalytic degradation of azo dyes. Nanoscale Res Lett. 2017;12:143. doi: 10.1186/s11671-017-1904-4. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
5. Kong JZ, Li AD, Li XY, Zhai HF, Zhang WQ, Gong YP, Li H, Wu D. Photo-degradation of methylene blue using Ta-doped ZnO nanoparticle. J Solid State Chem. 2010;183:1359–1364. doi: 10.1016/j.jssc.2010.04.005. [Cross Ref]
6. Jo WK, Selvam NCS. Enhanced visible light-driven photocatalytic performance of ZnO-g-C3N4 coupled with graphene oxide as a novel ternary nanocomposite. J Hazard Mater. 2015;299:462–470. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2015.07.042. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
7. Huo PW, Zhou MJ, Tang YF, Liu XL, Ma CC, Yu LB, Yan YS. Incorporation of N-ZnO/CdS/Graphene oxide composite photocatalyst for enhanced photocatalytic activity under visible light. J Alloys Compd. 2016;670:198–209. doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.01.247. [Cross Ref]
8. Kumar SG, Rao Koteswara KSR. Zinc oxide based photocatalysis: tailoring surface-bulk structure and related interfacial charge carrier dynamics for better environmental applications. RSC Adv. 2015;5:3306–3351. doi: 10.1039/C4RA13299H. [Cross Ref]
9. Yu WL, Zhang JF, Peng TY. New insight into the enhanced photocatalytic activity of N-, C- and S-doped ZnO photocatalysts. Appl Catal B. 2016;181:220–227. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2015.07.031. [Cross Ref]
10. Kumar S, Baruah A, Tonda S, Kumar B, Shanker V, Sreedhar B. Cost-effective and eco-friendly synthesis of novel and stable N-doped ZnO/g-C3N4 core-shell nanoplates with excellent visible-light responsive photocatalysis. Nano. 2014;6:4830–4842. [PubMed]
11. Fu HB, Xu TG, Zhu SB, Zhu YF. Photocorrosion inhibition and enhancement of photocatalytic activity for ZnO via hybridization with C-60. Environ Sci Technol. 2008;42:8064–8069. doi: 10.1021/es801484x. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
12. Sun MX, Fang YL, Kong YY, Sun SF, Yu ZS, Umar A. Graphitic carbon nitride (g-C3N4) coated titanium oxide nanotube arrays with enhanced photo-electrochemical performance. Dalton Trans. 2016;45:12702–12709. doi: 10.1039/C6DT02071B. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
13. Yang SB, Gong YJ, Zhang JS, Zhan L, Ma LL, Fang ZY, Vajtai R, Wang XC, Ajayan PM. Exfoliated graphitic carbon nitride nanosheets as efficient catalysts for hydrogen evolution under visible light. Adv Mater. 2013;25:2452–2456. doi: 10.1002/adma.201204453. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
14. Shi HF, Chen GQ, Zhang CL, Zou ZG. Polymeric g-C3N4 coupled with NaNbO3 nanowires toward enhanced photocatalytic reduction of CO2 into renewable fuel. ACS Catal. 2014;4:3637–3643. doi: 10.1021/cs500848f. [Cross Ref]
15. Liu C, Li CM, Fu XD, Raziq F, Qu Y, Jing LQ. Synthesis of silicate-bridged ZnO/g-C3N4 nanocomposites as efficient photocatalysts and its mechanism. RSC Adv. 2015;5:37275–37280. doi: 10.1039/C5RA01824B. [Cross Ref]
16. Chen DM, Wang KW, Ren TZ, Ding H, Zhu YF. Synthesis and characterization of the ZnO/mpg-C3N4 heterojunction photocatalyst with enhanced visible light photoactivity. Dalton Trans. 2014;43:13105–13114. doi: 10.1039/C4DT01347F. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
17. Ding MY, Wang W, Zhou YJ, Lu CH, Ni YR, Xu ZZ. Facile in situ synthesis of 2D porous g-C3N4 and g-C3N4/P25(N) heterojunction with enhanced quantum effect for efficient photocatalytic application. J Alloys Compd. 2015;635:34–40. doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2015.02.111. [Cross Ref]
18. Tian QY, Wu W, Yang SL, Liu J, Yao WJ, Ren F, Jiang CZ. Zinc oxide coating effect for the dye removal and photocatalytic mechanisms of flower-like MoS2 nanoparticles. Nanoscale Res Lett. 2017;12:221. doi: 10.1186/s11671-017-2005-0. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
19. Wang YJ, Wang QS, Zhan XY, Wang FM, Safdar M, He J. Visible light driven type II heterostructures and their enhanced photocatalysis properties: a review. Nano. 2013;5:8326–8339. [PubMed]
20. Yan SC, Li ZS, Zou ZG. Photodegradation performance of g-C3N4 fabricated by directly heating melamine. Langmuir. 2009;25:10397–10401. doi: 10.1021/la900923z. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
21. Qin HC, Li WY, Xia YJ, He T. Photocatalytic activity of heterostructures based on ZnO and N-doped ZnO. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2011;3:3152–3156. doi: 10.1021/am200655h. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
22. Han CC, Ge L, Chen CF, Li YJ, Xiao XL, Zhang YN, Guo LL. Novel visible light induced Co3O4-g-C3N4 heterojunction photocatalysts for efficient degradation of methyl orange. Appl Catal B. 2014;147:546–553. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2013.09.038. [Cross Ref]
23. Wang YJ, Rui S, Jie L, Zhu YF. Enhancement of photocurrent and photocatalytic activity of ZnO hybridized with graphite-like C3N4. Energy Environ Sci. 2011;4:2922–2929. doi: 10.1039/c0ee00825g. [Cross Ref]
24. Christoforidis KC, Montini T, Bontempi E, Zafeiratos S, Delgado Jaén JJ, Fornasiero P. Synthesis and photocatalytic application of visible-light active beta-Fe2O3/g-C3N4 hybrid nanocomposites. Appl Catal B. 2016;187:171–180. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2016.01.013. [Cross Ref]
25. Wang Y, Bai X, Pan C, He J, Zhu Y. Enhancement of photocatalytic activity of Bi2WO6 hybridized with graphite-like C3N4. J Mater Chem. 2012;22:11568–11573. doi: 10.1039/c2jm16873a. [Cross Ref]
26. Bai HW, Liu ZY, Sun DL. Hierarchical nitrogen-doped flowerlike ZnO nanostructure and its multifunctional environmental applications. Chem-Asian J. 2012;7:1772–1780. doi: 10.1002/asia.201200260. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
27. Liu Q, Guo YR, Chen ZH, Zhang ZG, Fang XM. Constructing a novel ternary Fe (III)/graphene/g-C3N4 composite photocatalyst with enhanced visible-light driven photocatalytic activity via interfacial charge transfer effect. Appl Catal B. 2016;183:231–241. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2015.10.054. [Cross Ref]
28. Jiang JZ, Zou J, Wee ATS, Zhang WJ. Use of single-layer g-C3N4/Ag hybrids for surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) Sci Rep. 2016;6:34599–34510. doi: 10.1038/srep34599. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
29. Yang XY, Wolcott A, Wang GM, Sobo A, Fitzmorris RC, Qian F, Zhang JZ, Li Y. Nitrogen-doped ZnO nanowire arrays for photoelectrochemical water splitting. Nano Lett. 2009;9:2331–2336. doi: 10.1021/nl900772q. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
30. Ji YX, Cao JF, Jiang LQ, Zhang YH, Yi ZG. G-C3N4/BiVO4 composites with enhanced and stable visible light photocatalytic activity. J Alloys Compd. 2014;590:9–14. doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2013.12.050. [Cross Ref]
31. Kochuveedu ST, Jang YH, Jang YJ, Kim DH. Visible light active photocatalysis on block copolymer induced strings of ZnO nanoparticles doped with carbon. J Mater Chem A. 2013;1:898–905. doi: 10.1039/C2TA00263A. [Cross Ref]
32. Li YY, Wang JS, Yao HC, Dang LY, Li ZJ. Efficient decomposition of organic compounds and reaction mechanism with BiOI photocatalyst under visible light irradiation. J Mol Catal A. 2011;334:116–122. doi: 10.1016/j.molcata.2010.11.005. [Cross Ref]
33. Lam SM, Sin JC, Abdullah AZ, Mohamed AR. Sunlight responsive WO3/ZnO nanorods for photocatalytic degradation and mineralization of chlorinated phenoxyacetic acid herbicides in water. J Colloid Interf Sci. 2015;450:34–44. doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2015.02.075. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
34. Rauf MA, Meetani MA, Khaleel A, Ahmed A. Photocatalytic degradation of methylene blue using a mixed catalyst and product analysis by LC/MS. Chem Eng J. 2010;157:373–378. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2009.11.017. [Cross Ref]
35. Liu L, Liu H, Zhao YP, Wang Y, Duan Y, Gao G, Ge M, Chen W. Directed synthesis of hierarchical nanostructured TiO2 catalysts and their morphology-dependent photocatalysis for phenol degradation. Environ Sci Technol. 2008;42:2342–2348. doi: 10.1021/es070980o. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
36. Wang QL, Li HY, JHe Y, Sun Q, Li QY, Yang JJ. Iron phthalocyanine-graphene donor-acceptor hybrids forvisible-light-assisted degradation of phenol in the presence of H2O2. Appl Catal B. 2016;192:182–192. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2016.03.047. [Cross Ref]

Articles from Nanoscale Research Letters are provided here courtesy of Springer