Search tips
Search criteria 


Logo of scirepAboutEditorial BoardFor AuthorsScientific Reports
Sci Rep. 2017; 7: 7947.
Published online 2017 August 11. doi:  10.1038/s41598-017-08478-w
PMCID: PMC5554170

Investigation into the stability and culturability of Chinese enterotypes


Although many gut microbial enterotypes have been reported in Europe, Africa and the U.S., their effects on human health are still not yet clear. Culturing gut microbial enterotypes in vitro will be helpful to study their effects and applications. Here, fecal samples from 13 healthy Chinese volunteers were collected and subjected to next-generation sequencing. The results showed that seven of these samples belong to the Bacteroides enterotype and another six to the Prevotella enterotype. Stability of these Chinese gut microbial enterotypes was also evaluated. Results showed that most of the tested volunteer gut microbiota to be very stable. For one volunteer, the bacterial community returned to the state it was in before intestinal lavage and antibiotics treatment after four months. XP medium was found effective for simulating the Bacteroides enterotype independent of the original gut microbial community in an in vitro chemostat culture system. Although, the Prevotella enterotype was not very well simulated in vitro, different culture elements selectively enriched different gut bacteria. Pectin and xylan were found to be related to the enrichment of the genera Bacteroides, Sutterella, and Flavonifractor in this chemostat culture system.


Many studies have shown that intestinal microbiota play important roles in the physiology and pathophysiology of both healthy and diseased hosts. Gut microbes take part in substance metabolism1 and regulate immune system development and balance2. Fecal bacteria transplantation, though an extreme method, has been used for intervention in some refractory diseases such as Clostridium difficile infection3, inflamatory bowel disease (IBD) and irritable bowel syndrome (IBS)4. In recent years, different gut microbial enterotypes have been identified according to different major bacterial constitutes in African, European, and American individuals57. Howerer, the physiological effects of these enterotypes and their relationship to disease are still not clear8. Although Zhang et al. have found enterotypes in obese Chinese children9, no Prevotella enterotypes have been found in healthy Chinese individuals in any population study10, 11. Whether Prevotella enterotypes also exist in healthy Chinese people needs further study.

De Filippo et al. have reported that diet plays a very important role in shaping gut microbial enterotypes5. Wu et al. also found long-term dietary patterns to be linked to gut microbial enterotypes6. However, the different functions of these enterotypes on host and substance metabolism need further study. Germ-free mice are a tool used for studying the function of gut microbiota12. However, Xiao et al. reported that only 4.0% of the mouse gut microbial genes were shared (95% identity, 90% coverage) with those of the human gut microbiome13. Whether animal experimental results accurately represent what happens in humans has recently aroused wide public concern14, 15. Chemostats are in vitro systems suitable for the study of interactions and metabolisms of colonic bacteria16. With appropriate operational parameters, the major groups of colonic bacteria can be maintained in numbers similar to those observed in vivo 17. The in vitro chemostat system used here may be a suitable alternative tool for the study of enterotype function.

In order to build an in vitro model to further evaluate the nutritional requirements for different enterotypes and to generate alternative donor bacterial communities for fecal transplantation, the stability and culturability of Chinese enterotypes were investigated in the current study.


Detection of the gut microbial enterotypes in healthy Chinese volunteers

To detect gut microbial enterotypes in healthy Chinese individuals, fecal samples from 13 volunteers were collected in Hangzhou and Beijing. Fecal bacterial genomic DNA was then extracted and sent for 16S rRNA gene V3-V4 region sequencing using the Miseq platform. Basic information of these volunteers and sequencing statistics results are listed in supplementary Tables 1 and 2, respectively. As shown in supplementary Figure 1A, the genus Bacteroides was relatively common in four Hangzhou and three Beijing volunteers. These samples were identified as having the Bacteroides enterotype. For these volunteers, the percentage of the bacterial population made up of the genus Bacteroides ranged from 46.09% to 65.50%. Another five Hangzhou volunteers and one Beijing volunteer had a higher percentage of genus Prevotella_9, whose percentage ranged from 48.40% to 87.12%. These were recognized as the Prevotella enterotype.

To verify the existence of gut microbial enterotypes in healthy Chinese people, three fecal samples were extracted at another laboratory and sent for sequencing using the 16S rRNA gene V4 region and Hiseq platform. As shown in supplementary Figure 2, the patterns of the bacterial communities were very similar to the Miseq results. The percentage of each genus found between these two methods was used for SPSS software analysis. The similarity coefficients were 0.975, 0.958 and 0.966, respectively (supplementary Figure 2). Bacterial communities of samples N1_T3_Ori and N2_T2_Ori were analyzed further using shotgun metagenome sequencing with 10 Gb sequences obtained for each sample. The 16S rRNA gene reads were aligned to a database for bacterial classification. As shown in supplementary Figure 1B, the genus Prevotella was the most common. The relative prevalence of Prevotella was 38.54% in NI_T3_Ori and 45.92% in N2_T2_Ori.

Comparison of Chinese enterotypes to African and European enterotypes

Although most countries host Bacteroides and Prevotella enterotypes, the differences between these enterotypes from different countries are of interesting. African and European enterotype data were downloaded from EMBL and compared to data from the current study. As shown in Fig. 1, although the Prevotella enterotype did not show obvious differences between Chinese and African populations (Fig. 1A), Europeans showed a higher prevalence of Faecalibacterium and a lower prevalence of Bacteroides than the Chinese (Fig. 1B).

Figure 1
A comparison of the Chinese bacterial community to the European and African communities. Seven Bacteroides and six Prevotella enterotypes were used in this analysis of Chinese bacterial 16S rRNA gene sequencing data. For European and African bacterial ...

Stability of Chinese enterotypes

In this study, fecal samples were collected from 10 volunteers at different points in time. As shown in supplementary Figure 3, the Shannon index and operational taxonomic unit (OTU) numbers were relatively stable for these samples. The stability of gut microbiota varied by subject. As shown in Fig. 2A, the bacterial community pattern was very similar in the volunteers, except that the Bacteroides enterotype of subject N13 changed to Ruminococcus, and that of N9 to the Prevotella enterotype. For N13, the similarity of gut microbiota was lowest at 15.5% between timepoints 2 and 3. For N9, it was the lowest at 10.3% between timepoints 1 and 2 (Fig. 2B). Although enterotype did not change in N6 and N12, the Klebsiella population was visibly increased at one point in time. For N12, the similarity of gut microbiota was lowest at 16.9% between timepoints 1 and 2 (Fig. 2B).

Figure 2
Stability of gut microbial enterotypes in Chinese hosts. Fecal samples were collected from ten healthy volunteers at different points in time. The bacterial community at the genus level is listed in Fig. 3A. The correlation coefficients of gut ...

During sample collection, perianal infection was observed in volunteer N1. N1′s Prevotella enterotype returned to normal four months later after colon hydrotherapy and antibiotic treatment. As shown in Fig. 2A, the column N1_T4_Ori representsthe gut microbiota of N1 three months before infection, and the column N1_T5_Ori represents that of N1 four months later after disease and treatment. Prevotella is the major bacterial genus in these two samples, and the similarity between these two columns was high at 0.927.

Simulated cultures of the Chinese gut microbial enterotypes

VI culture media have been reported to have good effects for simulating culture gut microbiota of the Bacteroides enterotype17. Wu et al. reported that volunteers in whom the Prevotella enterotype was predominant favored more sugars6. VI and VI with added sugar served as culture media to simulate the gut microbiota of Bacteroides and Prevotella enterotypes. After ten days of continuous culture, the bacterial communities in chemostats became stable as indicated by PCR-DGGE results (supplementary Figure 4). Fermentation products collected on day 13 were then collected for 16S rRNA gene sequencing. As shown in supplementary Figure 5A and Fig. 3, both VI and XP can simulate the gut microbiota of the Bacteroides enterotype, with the similarity between the original fecal bacterial community and the chemostat culture products being higher than 80% (Table 1). 40–50% of original fecal genus remained alive in the chemostat after 13 days of continuous culture (Fig. 4). However, the simulated efficiency of VI and XP media for the Prevotella enterotype was not as strong as expected (supplementary Figure 5B, Fig. 3A and C). Although 12.11% of Prevotella genus was detected in N1_T1_XP (supplementary Figure 5B), the majority of Prevotella bacteria did not grow very well in the chemostat (Fig. 3C and supplementary Figure 5B). The similarity of bacterial communities in the original fecal sample and chemostat culture product was below 5% (Table 1), and only 29.49–61.84% of fecal genera could survive in the chemostat (Fig. 4). However, bacterial communities in all VI and XP fermentation products were very similar to the Bacteroides enterotype (Fig. 3A). The similarity coefficient was over 85%, even from inocula that originated from the Prevotella enterotype (Table 1).

Figure 3
Chemostat simulation of cultures of Bacteroides and Prevotella enterotypes. Culture media VI, XP, MD1, and MD2 were used to simulate the bacterial communities of Bacteroides and Prevotella enterotypes in vitro. (A) Cluster analysis of the relationship ...
Table 1
Similarity of gut microbiota between original human fecal samples and fermentation products.
Figure 4
Analyses of the number of genera cultured in chemostats. 16 S rRNA gene high-through put sequencing data was classified using the rdp classifier method and silva123 database. At the genus level, Venn diagrams were then drawn by R package.

Though Bacteroides was the predominant genus cultured in both VI and XP media, 27 genera were significantly higher in the original fecal samples (Fig. 5). And different culture media selectively enriched different bacteria. As shown in Fig. 5, only the genera Lachnoclostridium and uncultured Ruminococcaceae were enriched after culture in vitro for six volunteers using VI media. The principal carbon source of the medium is soluble starch. For XP media, partially soluble starch is replaced with pectin and xylan. The genera Eubacterium_eligensgroup, Bacteroides, Candidatus Soleaferrea, Flavonifractor, Proteus, RuminococcaceaeUCG_013 and Sutterella were selectively increased.

Figure 5
Analysis of different abundant bacterial taxa using LefSe. The bacterial percentage of original fecal samples and fermentation samples was used for LefSe analysis. The p value < 0.05 was identified as significantly different among these ...

To improve the simulation of Prevotella growth, glucose and sucrose were added to the medium to serve as a carbon sources (MD1 and MD2) and beef extract as a nitrogen source (VL). Vitamin K and aspartic acid were also added into the chemostat (VI1 and VI2). Although Prevotella still did not grow very well in vitro (supplementary Figure 5B), and the similarity was still very low between the original fecal samples and chemostat-cultured products (supplementary Figure 5B), more genera (41.79–61.84%) were cultured in the chemostat (supplementary Figure 5C).

Detection of SCFA production

Before inoculation, short-chain fatty acid (SCFA) concentrations of the original fecal samples were measured. As illustrated in Fig. 6A, the differences in SCFA concentrations between Bacteroides and Prevotella enterotypes were not significant. And the relative percentage patterns of SCFAs between Bacteroides enterotype (volunteers N1_Ori, N2_Ori, and N3_Ori) and Prevotella enterotype (volunteers N10_Ori, N12_Ori, and N13_Ori) were similar (Fig. 6C). For fermentation samples, the SCFA patterns were similar among the different culture media (Fig. 6C), and the production of SCFAs using different culture media was not significantly different (Fig. 6B).

Figure 6
Total SCFA concentrations and relative percentages of SCFAs in fecal and fermentation samples. Acetic, propionic, isobutyric, butyric, isovaleric, and valeric acids were detected in the present study, and the total SCFA represents all SCFAs. The concentrations ...


In this study, we reported the existence of the Prevotella enterotype in healthy Chinese individuals. Five volunteers from Hangzhou and one volunteer from Beijing were found have a higher percentage of Prevotella in fecal samples (supplementary Figure 1). Different sequence platforms and shotgun metagenomic analysis further verified the existence of the Prevotella enterotype in healthy Chinese individuals (supplementary Figures 1B and 2). Combined with the results from Zhang et al.9, this is consistent with a previous study that found Bacteroides and Prevotella enterotypes to be present in both healthy and diseased individuals8.

The stability of gut microbiota is the theoretical basis for targeted disease treatment. Although some studies have shown that the gut bacterial community becomes stable after the host reaches adulthood18, 19, Knights et al. suggested that the enterotype distribution is continuous8. The stability of Chinese gut microbial enterotypes needs to be studied further. In the present work, the gut microbiota of six of the ten volunteers was very stable. Participant N1′s intestinal bacterial community returned to its pre-disease state four months after intestinal lavage and antibiotic treatment (Fig. 2). However, Browne et al. have found that antibiotics treatment, especially in children, changes the gut bacterial community long-term20. Keeping the gut microbiota stable is possible in adults, even those who have experienced short-term, severe disorders, if they maintain consistent living and eating habits.

Fecal bacteria transplantation is one of the more extreme methods of intervention for intestinal dysbiosis. In 2013, van Nood et al. reported the treatment effects of fecal bacteria transplantation on Clostridium difficile infection3. Other diseases treated using fecal bacteria transplantation have included IBD and IBS4. However, most of the donors are patients’ relatives, and samples were collected for fresh use. Only a small number of fecal samples can be collected from one person at a time, so the microbial community for donors is different every time and the risk also varies due to differences in the bacteria. This has hindered the extensive commercial application of fecal bacteria transplantation. An in vitro chemostat system maybe an alternative method to produce fecal bacteria transplantation products for human use. In this study, cultured gut microbes were simulated in vitro using a continuous chemostat system, and the similarity between fermentation products and original fecal samples was higher than 80% for the Bacteroides enterotype. The degree of simulation was not affected by the original enterotype (Table 1). The Bacteroides enterotype was identified after culture in vitro using Bacteroides and Prevotella enterotypes as inocula, which may be convenient for donor selection. At the genus level, bacterial communities found in Chinese hosts were very similar to those of African and European hosts (Fig. 1). This provides a basis for future use of the fermentation products as fecal bacteria transplantation donors.

Diet is one of the most important factors affecting the gut microbial community21, 22. De Filippo et al. inferred that diet may be the major reason for different enterotypes5. Kovatcheva-Datchary et al. reported the prevalence of Prevotella to be higher after the addition of more fiber to the diet23. A diet questionnaire filled out by American participants also showed that Prevotella volunteers favored more sugars, especially monosaccharides6. Unfortunately, it was not possible to simulate the bacterial community of the Prevotella enterotype (Fig. 3 and supplementary Figure 5), even with added glucose. We also tried to modulate nitrogen, amino acids, and vitamines to improve the simulation. However, the genus Prevotella still did not grow well in chemostats. We therefore speculate that Prevotella growth require nutrition factors originating from the host. Wu et al. reported that host factors may have a strong effect on gut microbiota24. Gut-chip-like fermentation equipment has been used to culture host cells and gut bacteria simultaneously2527. This may improve the simulation of Prevotella culture in vitro.

Although the relationship between enterotypes and different diseases is still not clear8, diet may be the major reason for different enterotypes5, 6. SCFAs, as the key gut bacterial metabolites produced by fermenting dietary fiber, may be the link between diet, enterotype, and host physiology28. Chen et al. recently reported that the Prevotella enterotype can ferment fructooligosaccharides, sorghum, and corn arabinoxylans and significantly promote higher propionate and total SCFA production compared to the Bacteroides enterotype29. In this study, we found that the total concentration and the relative percentage of SCFAs was similar between Prevotella and Bacteroides enterotypes (Fig. 6). And the total concentrations and relative percentages of SCFAs in fermentation products using different culture media were also similar (Fig. 6). This discrepancy may be due to the use of only one Prevotella and one Bacteroides enterotype sample in the Chen et al. study. The use of different molecular weight carbohydrates (polysaccharides vs oligosaccharides and monosaccharides) may also affect SCFA production. The nutritional requirements and metabolic properties of different enterotypes still require further study.

Results showed that different sources of carbon selectively enriched different gut bacteria (Fig. 5), which will be helpful for gut bacterial isolation. Lau et al. reported that some bacterial OTU cannot be detected using next-generation sequencing due to the nature of PCR and low abundance30. Selection isolation may be an alternative method for gut bacterial detection. The current results also showed that many genera cannot be detected in their original samples, but were rather detected after culture in vitro (Fig. 4 and supplementary Figure 5C). Different culture media selectively enriched different bacteria. For samples from six of the volunteers, only the genera Lachnoclostridium and uncultured Ruminococcaceae were enriched in VI media. Bacteroides, Sutterella and Flavonifractor were enriched using XP culture media. Enrichment of the genera Sutterella and Flavonifractor may have been related to the replacement of 4 g of soluble starch with 2 g pectin and 2 g xylan. In this way, selective enrichment cultures of gut microbiota may be helpful to isolate newly discovered bacteria and bacteria with low abundance.

In summary, our results showed Bacteroides and Prevotella enterotypes to be present in healthy Chinese adults. Gut microbial communities remained stable for most of the people tested, even those who experienced short-term but severe disorders. The bacterial community of the Bacteroides enterotype was simulated well in vitro, independent of the original enterotypes.

Materials and Methods

Origin of human fecal samples

Fecal samples of 9 healthy human volunteers (6 males and 3 females), ranging in age from 25 to 38 years old, were collected from Hangzhou. Fecal samples of 4 healthy human volunteers (1 male and 3 females), ranging in age from 10 to 20 years old, were collected from Beijing. For 10 volunteers, fecal samples were collected more than once. Exclusion criteria included recent antibiotic treatment, frequent gastrointestinal disorders, and metabolic disease. This study was carried out according to the Helsinki Declaration and informed written consent was obtained from all human subjects. Details regarding age, gender, and sample collection times are listed in supplementary Table 1. About 2 g of fresh fecal samples were collected immediately after defecation, placed in an ice box, and stored at −80 °C for further analysis. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Zhejiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences and PLA General Hospital.

DNA extraction

Bacterial genomic DNA was extracted using a QIAamp DNA Stool Mini Kit according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Qiagen, German). The concentration of extracted DNA was determined using a NanoDrop ND-2000 (NanoDrop Technologies, USA), and its integrity and size were confirmed by agar gel electrophoresis (1.0%). To determine the quality of the DNA, primers of 341F (5′-ATT ACC GCG GCT GCT GG-3′) and 534R (5′-CCT ACG GGA GGC AGC AG-3′) were used to amplify the V3 region of the bacterial 16S rRNA gene.

16S rRNA gene sequencing and analysis

According to previous work, bacterial 16S rRNA genes were amplified from extracted DNA using barcoded primers 338F (5′-ACT CCT ACG GGA GGC AGC A-3′) with 806R (5′-GGA CTA CHV GGG TWT CTA AT-3′)31, 515F(5′-GTG CCA GCM GCC GCG GTA A-3′) with 806R (5′-GGA CTA CHV GGG TWT CTA AT-3′)32 or 515F with 907R (5′-CCG TCA ATT CMT TTR AGT TT-3′)33. Most next-generation sequencing was performed using an Illumina MiSeq. 300PE, which was conducted by Majorbio Bio-Pharm Technology Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China. Comparisons of the taxonomic differences in sequences were generated by different labs, the bacterial genomic DNA of three fecal samples was extracted at Beijing and Hangzhou by different students, and were sent for sequencing on a Hiseq platform at Novogene (Beijing, China) and MiSeq platform at Majorbio (Shanghai, China), individually. Details of the primers and platforms used in this study are given in supplementary Table 2.

Next-generation sequencing reads generated in this study and data downloaded from the European Nucleotide Archive (ERP000133) were identified by barcodes using QIIME pipeline34. Clean, high-quality sequences were then used for downstream analysis. A 97% similarity cutoff was used to define OTU by using Mothur35. One sequence from each OTU was selected and considered representative. These sequences were classified using the rdp classifier method36, 37 and silva123 database ( Good’s coverage, alpha diversities including Simpson and Shannon indexes, and richness (observed number of OTUs) were calculated using Mothur.

Metagenomic sequencing and analysis

To further verify the existence of the Prevotella enterotype in Chinese hosts, one male and one female fecal sample were randomly selected for shotgun sequencing. Bacterial genomic DNA was extracted using a QIAamp DNA Stool Mini Kit, and 300 bps libraries were constructed using Covaris M220, a TruSeq™ DNA Sample Prep Kit and a cBot Truseq PE Cluster Kit v3-cBot-HS. A Truseq SBS Kit v3-HS (200 cycles) was then used for sequencing on an Illuminal Hiseq platform. The bacterial 16S rRNA gene sequences were then picked out for taxa analysis.

Single-stage chemostat fermentation

A parallel chemostat system containing two single-stage chemostats systems (330 ml working volume) was set up as described previously by Yin et al.38. The pH (6.2) was automatically controlled using a pH controller, and the temperature (37 °C) was maintained using a circulating water bath. The systems were kept anaerobic by continuous sparging with O2-free N2 and operated at a dilution rate of 0.04 ml/h.

Based on the enterotype data, some volunteers’ intermediate partial fecal samples were collected for homogenizing in stomacher bags with 0.1 M anaerobic PBS to make 10% (wt/vol) slurries. Large particles of food residue were removed by passing the mixture twice through a 0.4 mm sieve. Then 30 ml of human fecal slurry was inoculated into the parallel chemostat system containing different culture media (Table 2). After overnight equilibration, fresh medium was added to the system using a peristaltic pump. The system was equilibrated for 7 days before samples (15 ml) were collected for DNA extraction and sequencing. In this study, veal infusion broth (VI medium) containing mainly polymerized carbon and protein39, 40, and Viande Levure (VL) medium, containing mainly hydrolyzed nitrogen and simple sugars41, were used as the basal culture media. Simple sugar24, vitamins42 and amino acids43 were added given that some studies have found that these components maybe related to Prevotella growth.

Table 2
Components of the culture media used in this study.

PCR-DGGE analysis

To evaluate the stability of the chemostat system in vitro, the microbial communities were analyzed using PCR-DGGE. The V3 region of the 16S rRNA gene (positions 341 to 534 of the Escherichia coli gene) was analyzed using PCR-denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) as described previously38. DGGE was performed using a DCode universal mutation detection system (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) in an 8% (wt/vol) polyacrylamide gel containing a linear 30%-to-60% denaturant gradient with a constant voltage of 200 V at 60 °C for 4 h. The gels were then visualized by staining with SYBR green I nucleic acid (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) for 45 min and washed twice with deionized water. The DGGE profiles were analyzed for similarity using Quantity One software (version 4.6.1; Bio-Rad, USA).

Short chain fatty acid (SCFA) analysis

SCFA production was determined by using GC as previously described44. Briefly, 1 mL of the fermentation products or 10% (wt/vol) fecal slurries were mixed with 0.2 mL of 25% (w/v) metaphosphoric acid. The samples were subsequently centrifuged (14, 000 g for 20 min), and the supernatant was used for SCFA determination (Shimadzu, GC-2010 Plus, Japan). An InertCap FFAP column (0.25 mm × 30 m × 0.25 μm) was used in this study. Peaks were integrated using GC Solution software, and SCFA content was quantified by using the single-point internal standard method. Peak identity and internal response factors were determined using a 20-mM calibration cocktail that included acetic, propionic, isobutyric, butyric, isovaleric, and valeric acids.

Statistical analysis

To compare Illumina-based high-throughput sequencing data, Pearson correlation coefficients were analyzed using SPSS software (version 20.0; SPSS Inc., USA). The correlation coefficients among samples were calculated based on the percentage of each bacterial classification unit at the genus level. Plot cladograms and significantly different bacterial taxa were analyzed using LefSE Software ( The SCFAs of each sample were measured in triplicate. The differences between means were assessed by the SPSS software. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Data availability

All high-throughput sequencing data in the present study have been deposited in the sequence read archive (SRA) of the NCBI database under number SRP082347. The shotgun sequencing data have been deposited in the NCBI database under numbers SRR4254099, SRR4254100, SRX2174002, and SRX2174003.

Electronic supplementary material


This work was supported by grants from the National High Technology Research and Development Program of China (863 Program, NO. 2015AA020701), the National Nature Science Foundation (NSFC, No. 31370156), and State Key Laboratory Breeding Base for Zhejiang Sustainable Pest and Disease Control (No. 2010DS700124-ZZ1604 and No. 2010DS700124-ZZ1701). We thank Junjie Qin from Promegene Co. Ltd for help with data analysis. We thank LetPub ( for its linguistic assistance during the preparation of this manuscript.

Author Contributions

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: Yeshi Yin, Yunsheng Yang, and Xin Wang. Performed experiments: Yeshi Yin, Bin Fan, Wei Liu, Rongrong Ren, Huahai Chen, Shaofeng Bai, and Liying Zhu. Analyzed the data: Yeshi Yin, Gang Sun, Yunsheng Yang, and Xin Wang. Wrote the paper: Yeshi Yin, Yunsheng Yang, and Xin Wang.


Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.


Yeshi Yin and Bin Fan contributed equally to this work.

Electronic supplementary material

Supplementary information accompanies this paper at doi:10.1038/s41598-017-08478-w

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Contributor Information

Yunsheng Yang, moc.621@cdd103ynnus.

Xin Wang, moc.anis@101wwxx.


1. Sonnenburg JL, Backhed F. Diet-microbiota interactions as moderators of human metabolism. Nature. 2016;535:56–64. doi: 10.1038/nature18846. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
2. Honda K, Littman DR. The microbiota in adaptive immune homeostasis and disease. Nature. 2016;535:75–84. doi: 10.1038/nature18848. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
3. van Nood E, et al. Duodenal infusion of donor feces for recurrent Clostridium difficile. The New England journal of medicine. 2013;368:407–415. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1205037. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
4. Kelly CR, et al. Update on Fecal Microbiota Transplantation 2015: Indications, Methodologies, Mechanisms, and Outlook. Gastroenterology. 2015;149:223–237. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2015.05.008. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
5. De Filippo C, et al. Impact of diet in shaping gut microbiota revealed by a comparative study in children from Europe and rural Africa. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2010;107:14691–14696. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1005963107. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
6. Wu GD, et al. Linking long-term dietary patterns with gut microbial enterotypes. Science. 2011;334:105–108. doi: 10.1126/science.1208344. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
7. Arumugam M, et al. Enterotypes of the human gut microbiome. Nature. 2011;473:174–180. doi: 10.1038/nature09944. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
8. Knights D, et al. Rethinking “enterotypes” Cell host & microbe. 2014;16:433–437. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2014.09.013. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
9. Zhang C, et al. Dietary Modulation of Gut Microbiota Contributes to Alleviation of Both Genetic and Simple Obesity in Children. EBioMedicine. 2015;2:968–984. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2015.07.007. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
10. Zhang J, et al. A phylo-functional core of gut microbiota in healthy young Chinese cohorts across lifestyles, geography and ethnicities. The ISME journal. 2015;9:1979–1990. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2015.11. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
11. Nakayama J, et al. Diversity in gut bacterial community of school-age children in Asia. Scientific reports. 2015;5:8397. doi: 10.1038/srep08397. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
12. Bhattarai Y, Kashyap PC. Germ-Free Mice Model for Studying Host-Microbial Interactions. Methods in molecular biology. 2016;1438:123–135. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-3661-8_8. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
13. Xiao L, et al. A catalog of the mouse gut metagenome. Nature biotechnology. 2015;33:1103–1108. doi: 10.1038/nbt.3353. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
14. Reardon S. Dirty room-mates make lab mice more useful. Nature. 2016;532:294–295. doi: 10.1038/532294a. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
15. Reese TA, et al. Sequential Infection with Common Pathogens Promotes Human-like Immune Gene Expression and Altered Vaccine Response. Cell host & microbe. 2016;19:713–719. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2016.04.003. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
16. Macfarlane GT, Macfarlane S. Models for intestinal fermentation: association between food components, delivery systems, bioavailability and functional interactions in the gut. Current opinion in biotechnology. 2007;18:156–162. doi: 10.1016/j.copbio.2007.01.011. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
17. Lei F, et al. Higher-level production of volatile fatty acids in vitro by chicken gut microbiotas than by human gut microbiotas as determined by functional analyses. Applied and environmental microbiology. 2012;78:5763–5772. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00327-12. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
18. Zoetendal EG, Akkermans AD, De Vos WM. Temperature gradient gel electrophoresis analysis of 16S rRNA from human fecal samples reveals stable and host-specific communities of active bacteria. Applied and environmental microbiology. 1998;64:3854–3859. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
19. Turnbaugh PJ, et al. The human microbiome project. Nature. 2007;449:804–810. doi: 10.1038/nature06244. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
20. Browne H. Antibiotics, gut bugs and the young. Nature reviews. Microbiology. 2016;14:336. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro.2016.73. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
21. David LA, et al. Diet rapidly and reproducibly alters the human gut microbiome. Nature. 2014;505:559–563. doi: 10.1038/nature12820. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
22. Sonnenburg ED, et al. Diet-induced extinctions in the gut microbiota compound over generations. Nature. 2016;529:212–215. doi: 10.1038/nature16504. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
23. Kovatcheva-Datchary P, et al. Dietary Fiber-Induced Improvement in Glucose Metabolism Is Associated with Increased Abundance of Prevotella. Cell metabolism. 2015;22:971–982. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2015.10.001. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
24. Wu M, et al. Genetic determinants of in vivo fitness and diet responsiveness in multiple human gut Bacteroides. Science. 2015;350:aac5992. doi: 10.1126/science.aac5992. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
25. Marzorati M, et al. The HMI module: a new tool to study the Host-Microbiota Interaction in the human gastrointestinal tract in vitro. BMC microbiology. 2014;14:133. doi: 10.1186/1471-2180-14-133. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
26. Kim HJ, Li H, Collins JJ, Ingber DE. Contributions of microbiome and mechanical deformation to intestinal bacterial overgrowth and inflammation in a human gut-on-a-chip. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2016;113:E7–15. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1522193112. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
27. Shah P, et al. A microfluidics-based in vitro model of the gastrointestinal human-microbe interface. Nature communications. 2016;7:11535. doi: 10.1038/ncomms11535. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
28. Koh A, De Vadder F, Kovatcheva-Datchary P, Backhed F. From Dietary Fiber to Host Physiology: Short-Chain Fatty Acids as Key Bacterial Metabolites. Cell. 2016;165:1332–1345. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.05.041. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
29. Chen T, et al. Fiber-utilizing capacity varies in Prevotella- versus Bacteroides-dominated gut microbiota. Scientific reports. 2017;7:2594. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-02995-4. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
30. Lau JT, et al. Capturing the diversity of the human gut microbiota through culture-enriched molecular profiling. Genome medicine. 2016;8:72. doi: 10.1186/s13073-016-0327-7. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
31. Dennis KL, et al. Adenomatous polyps are driven by microbe-instigated focal inflammation and are controlled by IL-10-producing T cells. Cancer Res. 2013;73:5905–5913. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-13-1511. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
32. Lebret K, et al. Choice of molecular barcode will affect species prevalence but not bacterial community composition. Mar Genomics. 2016;29:39–43. doi: 10.1016/j.margen.2016.09.001. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
33. Xiong J, et al. Geographic distance and pH drive bacterial distribution in alkaline lake sediments across Tibetan Plateau. Environ Microbiol. 2012;14:2457–2466. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2012.02799.x. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
34. Kuczynski, J. et al. Using QIIME to analyze 16S rRNA gene sequences from microbial communities. Curr Protoc Bioinformatics Chapter 10, Unit 10 17 (2011). [PMC free article] [PubMed]
35. Schloss PD, et al. Introducing mothur: open-source, platform-independent, community-supported software for describing and comparing microbial communities. Applied and environmental microbiology. 2009;75:7537–7541. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01541-09. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
36. Cole JR, et al. The Ribosomal Database Project: improved alignments and new tools for rRNA analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009;37:D141–145. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkn879. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
37. Wang Q, Garrity GM, Tiedje JM, Cole JR. Naive Bayesian classifier for rapid assignment of rRNA sequences into the new bacterial taxonomy. Applied and environmental microbiology. 2007;73:5261–5267. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00062-07. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
38. Yin Y, et al. Exposure of different bacterial inocula to newborn chicken affects gut microbiota development and ileum gene expression. The ISME journal. 2010;4:367–376. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2009.128. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
39. Child MW, et al. Studies on the effect of system retention time on bacterial populations colonizing a three-stage continuous culture model of the human large gut using FISH techniques. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2006;55:299–310. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2005.00016.x. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
40. Macfarlane S, Woodmansey EJ, Macfarlane GT. Colonization of mucin by human intestinal bacteria and establishment of biofilm communities in a two-stage continuous culture system. Applied and environmental microbiology. 2005;71:7483–7492. doi: 10.1128/AEM.71.11.7483-7492.2005. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
41. Genovese KJ, et al. Competitive exclusion of Salmonella from the gut of neonatal and weaned pigs. J Food Prot. 2003;66:1353–1359. doi: 10.4315/0362-028X-66.8.1353. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
42. Takahashi N, Sato T. Dipeptide utilization by the periodontal pathogens Porphyromonas gingivalis, Prevotella intermedia, Prevotella nigrescens and Fusobacterium nucleatum. Oral Microbiol Immunol. 2002;17:50–54. doi: 10.1046/j.0902-0055.2001.00089.x. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
43. Takahashi N, Yamada T. Pathways for amino acid metabolism by Prevotella intermedia and Prevotella nigrescens. Oral Microbiol Immunol. 2000;15:96–102. doi: 10.1034/j.1399-302x.2000.150205.x. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
44. Yang L, Bian G, Su Y, Zhu W. Comparison of faecal microbial community of lantang, bama, erhualian, meishan, xiaomeishan, duroc, landrace, and yorkshire sows. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci. 2014;27:898–906. doi: 10.5713/ajas.2013.13621. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group