PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of materialsLink to Publisher's site
 
Materials (Basel). 2017 June; 10(6): 678.
Published online 2017 June 20. doi:  10.3390/ma10060678
PMCID: PMC5554059

Ternary CNTs@TiO2/CoO Nanotube Composites: Improved Anode Materials for High Performance Lithium Ion Batteries

Abstract

TiO2 nanotubes (NTs) synthesized by electrochemical anodization are discussed as very promising anodes for lithium ion batteries, owing to their high structural stability, high surface area, safety, and low production cost. However, their poor electronic conductivity and low Li+ ion diffusivity are the main drawbacks that prevent them from achieving high electrochemical performance. Herein, we report the fabrication of a novel ternary carbon nanotubes (CNTs)@TiO2/CoO nanotubes composite by a two-step synthesis method. The preparation includes an initial anodic fabrication of well-ordered TiO2/CoO NTs from a Ti-Co alloy, followed by growing of CNTs horizontally on the top of the oxide films using a simple spray pyrolysis technique. The unique 1D structure of such a hybrid nanostructure with the inclusion of CNTs demonstrates significantly enhanced areal capacity and rate performances compared to pure TiO2 and TiO2/CoO NTs, without CNTs tested under identical conditions. The findings reveal that CNTs provide a highly conductive network that improves Li+ ion diffusivity, promoting a strongly favored lithium insertion into the TiO2/CoO NT framework, and hence resulting in high capacity and an extremely reproducible high rate capability.

Keywords: titanium dioxide, cobalt oxide, anodic oxidation, spray pyrolysis, carbon nanotubes, mixed oxide nanotubes, composite materials

1. Introduction

Electrochemical performance of pure TiO2 can be improved by mixing them mechanically with some carbon derivatives such as graphene, carbon black, or CNTs during a slurry preparation [1,2,3]. Unfortunately, it is not possible to use the mechanical mixing for TiO2 NT arrays, as this technique destroys their tubular structure. Another alternative has been oriented to the thermal treatment of anodically synthesized TiO2 NTs in a methane–hydrogen-containing atmosphere in the presence of Fe precursors to perform carbon coating. Such carbon-coated TiO2 NTs showed a remarkable improvement in the electrical conductivity when tested for supercapacitor applications [4]. CNTs are very attractive materials for synthesizing elegant heterojunction composite anodes with TiO2 NTs, owing to their high electronic conductivity, structural stability, and the ease of manufacturing through mass production routes [5,6,7,8].

Other previous studies address the synthesis of many binary composites from CNTs and pure TiO2 for lithium ion batteries. The prepared TiO2 commonly exhibits forms like nanoparticles or nanospheres, which require additional polymeric binder and conductive carbon in the electrode manufacturing [6,7,8,9,10,11]. Additionally, most of these studies show that CNTs are utilized as a support for TiO2 (or TiO2 is filled into spacings between the CNTs in a CNT array).

In the present study, we propose a new strategy to realize deposition of CNTs on anodically fabricated TiO2/CoO NTs using a simple spray pyrolysis technique. CNTs function as conductive networks that connect TiO2 nanotubes from the opposite side of the current collector, allowing for better electrical and ionic conductivities, and paving the way for superior lithium ion insertion with excellent rate performance. In addition, the as-fabricated ternary composite is directly used as a binder- and additive-free electrode, taking advantage of utilizing the alloy substrate as a current collector and recommending them for low cost and high performance batteries.

To the best of our knowledge, our study is the first attempt to fabricate a ternary composite electrode by applying surface modifications on anodically grown TiO2/CoO nanotube arrays with CNTs for lithium ion battery applications. We believe that integrating such a ternary composite in interdisciplinary applications will open the door for achieving new advancements (which will also apply to a wide range of other subjects, such as water purification, water splitting, photocatalysis, and supercapacitors).

2. Experimental

2.1. Synthesis of TiO2 and TiO2/CoO Nanotubes

TiO2/CoO NTs were grown on Ti80Co20 alloy substrates using anodic oxidation technique, in which a formamide-based solution containing 0.3 M NH4F (99% purity, Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) and 0.1 M H3PO4 (85%, Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) was utilized as an electrolyte, while the formation voltage was adjusted to 60 V for 10 h. The formation potential (60 V) was chosen based on the highest areal capacity achieved by such nanotubes, which is related to the highest loading mass of the electrodes formed between 20 and 60 V [12]. The detailed preparation information of the alloy substrate and fabrication procedures of TiO2/CoO NTs are described in our previous study [12]. As a reference, pure TiO2 nanotubes were synthesized from Ti metal substrates (0.25 mm thickness, 99.8% purity, Alfa Aesar, Karlsruhe, Germany), employing the same anodization conditions. The as-prepared TiO2/CoO NTs were transferred into the spray pyrolysis system for the deposition of CNTs.

2.2. Synthesis of CNTs@TiO2/CoO NT Composite

Multi-walled CNTs were synthesized on the surface of TiO2/CoO NT arrays using a single-step spray pyrolysis technique. A mixture of 1.25 g ferrocene (C10H10Fe, 99.5% purity, Alfa Aesar, Karlsruhe, Germany) and 0.5 g benzeneboronic acid (C6H7BO2, 98% purity, Alfa Aesar, Karlsruhe, Germany) in 100 mL toluene (C7H8, 99.99% purity, Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) was used as precursor solution. A steady precursor spray was generated with the help of a spray system and the fine spray was carried by argon gas into a horizontal quartz tube, maintained at a temperature of 860 °C. The as-prepared TiO2/CoO NT sample was placed in the middle of the quartz tube. The synthesis was carried out until the precursor solution was exhausted (~25 min). Fe from ferrocene nucleates the growth of CNTs, whereas toluene serves as the carbon precursor. Boron, from the benzeneboronic acid, aids in the formation of stable bends in the CNTs and significantly increases the aspect ratio of the nanotubes, resulting in a uniformly covered CNT layer on the substrates [13].

2.3. Synthesis of Pure TiO2 and CNTs@TiO2 NTs

In comparison, TiO2 nanotubes were grown on the surface of Ti foils (0.25 mm thick, 99.8% purity, Alfa Aesar, Karlsruhe, Germany), employing the same anodic oxidation conditions as used for the Ti-Co alloy. Onto the as-prepared TiO2 nanotubes, CNTs were covered under the same preparation conditions as used for CNTs@TiO2/CoO NT composites (as described in the previous section).

2.4. Material Characterization

The surface morphology of the as-prepared TiO2/CoO and CNTs@TiO2/CoO NTs was investigated by field emission scanning electron microscopy (Gemini LEO 1530, Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany and Nova Nanosem 200, FEI Electron Optics, Eindhoven, The Netherlands) at an acceleration voltage of 20 kV. Phase analyses of the as-fabricated TiO2 and TiO2/CoO nanotubes (before and after the deposition of CNTs) were performed by X-ray diffraction (XRD, X’Pert Pro, PANalytical, Eindhoven, The Netherlands), using Co Kα radiation and a PIXcel detector in Bragg-Brentano geometry. Raman spectra of the as-fabricated CNTs@TiO2/CoO NTs were recorded at a laser power of 8 mW and an excitation wavelength of 532 nm (DXR Smart Raman, Thermo Scientific, Madison, WI, USA). STEM-EDXS was carried out for the as-prepared TiO2/CoO NTs using a FEI Tecnai F30 microscope (FEI Electron Optics, Eindhoven, The Netherlands) at 300 kV acceleration voltage.

2.5. Coin Cell Assembly and Electrochemical Testing

We employed the as-prepared TiO2/CoO and CNTs@TiO2/CoO NTs directly, without additional binder or conductive additives taking advantage of utilizing the Ti-Co substrates as current collectors. Half cells were assembled as coin cells of the CR2025 type in an Ar-filled glove box under controlled O2 and H2O content (<0.1 ppm), in which the CNTs@TiO2/CoO NTs were used as working electrodes, and a lithium foil (Alfa Aesar, Karlsruhe, Germany, 99.9%) as a counter electrode; a Celgard 2500 polypropylene separator (Celgard, Charlotte, NC, USA) with 16 mm diameter and 25 µm thickness was also used, along with the standard LP30 electrolyte (1 M LiPF6, 1:1 v/v DMC/EC, BASF Battery Materials, Independence, OH, USA). The average weight of the pure TiO2 and TiO2/CoO was determined after separating the nanotubes from Ti and Ti-Co alloy substrates by sonication in a mixture of ethanol and deionized water (volume ratio 9:1) [12]. The mass of each electrode was ≈1.066 mg. The mass of the deposited CNTs was determined by weighing the electrode before and after the spray pyrolysis step. The average CNT mass per electrode area was ≈0.12 mg. The electrochemical measurements were performed by a multichannel potentiostat–galvanostat (VMP3, Bio-Logic SAS, Seyssinet-Pariset, France). Cyclic voltammetry tests (CV) were carried out in a potential range of 0.1–3 V vs. Li/Li+, at a scan rate of 0.1 mV·s−1. The assembled cells were then galvanostatically cycled at a current density of 50 µA·cm−2, corresponding to a current density of 1 C between 0.1 and 3 V vs. Li/Li+. In comparison, TiO2/CoO NTs were assembled and tested under identical conditions. Electrochemical impedance spectroscopic (EIS) tests were conducted between 100 kHz and 0.1 Hz at a potential of 1.7 V after 50 charging/discharging cycles (at a current density of 50 µA·cm−2).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Characterization

The typical fabrication process of CNTs@TiO2/CoO NTs is presented in Figure 1a. Firstly, the TiO2/CoO NTs were grown on the two-phase Ti80Co20 alloy. The as-grown TiO2/CoO NTs were subsequently subjected to a surface modification with CNTs through spray pyrolysis. The as-formed CNTs@TiO2/CoO NTs were then assembled and tested as anodes against lithium in a coin cell battery. A photograph of the pristine and CNT-covered electrode is shown in Figure 1b.

Figure 1
Schematic illustration of the fabrication strategy of ternary CNTs@TiO2/CoO NTs (a); a photograph of the TiO2/CoO NTs before (left electrode) and after CNT covering (right electrode) (b).

The surface morphologies of the as-formed TiO2/CoO NTs and post-growth CNTs were examined using SEM.

Figure 2a shows a low magnification view of the alloy substrate after the anodization process, (where the dark and bright areas represent β-Ti and Ti2Co phases, respectively, of the Ti-Co alloy). The high magnification top view of β-Ti and Ti2Co are displayed in micrographs (b) and (c) of Figure 2. Evidently, well-ordered, clear-cut TiO2/CoO NTs are successfully formed on the entire surface of the Ti-Co alloy. The average diameter of the nanotubes grown on β-Ti is 40 nm. The nanotubes grown on the Ti2Co phase showed an average diameter of 37 nm. The tubular structure of the oxide film is also indicated from the cross-sectional view of the oxide layer, presented in the inset of image (Figure 2b). STEM-EDXS measurements shown in Figure S1 (Supplementary Information) reveal that the fabricated nanotubes are composed of Ti and Co oxides, implying the good mixing of the Co–O and Ti–O species in the framework (further characterization details of TiO2/CoO NTs are addressed in our previous report [12]). Panel (d) in Figure 2 manifests the entire overview of the oxide surface after performing the CNT growth. It clearly shows that the CNT layer covers the whole surface of the oxide NT array, indicating a uniform coverage. Figure 2e demonstrates the high magnification top-view of the as-fabricated CNTs@TiO2/CoO NTs sample. The outer nanotube diameter of the CNTs ranges from 20 to 27 nm (Figure 2e), which is a characteristic feature of the multi-walled carbon nanotubes grown by this technique [13]. It obviously shows that the CNTs are formed horizontally in an interwoven web-like structure, suggesting that CNTs can effectively connect the individual TiO2/CoO nanotubes through a high conductive network and may serve as a rather charge collector. Thus, the electrical and the ionic conductivities of the CNTs@TiO2/CoO NT electrode are expected to be improved allowing for a higher Li+ ion diffusion and storage efficiency. Successful CNTs deposition on pure TiO2 was also revealed from SEM micrographs in Figure S2 (Supplementary Information).

Figure 2
SEM micrographs, an overview of anodized Ti-Co alloy (a); high magnification of the β-Ti (b) and the Ti2Co (c) phases anodized at 60 V; low (d) and high (e) magnifications of the ternary CNTs@TiO2/CoO NTs; and Raman spectra of ternary CNTs@TiO ...

Raman spectroscopy provides important information about the carbon species, such as details related to the C-C bonds and defects that can be effectively obtained from the change in the signal shift. Figure 2f displays the Raman spectrum of the CNTs@TiO2/CoO NTs sample. The typical disorder-induced D band (~1335 cm−1) and tangential modes (G band, ~1587 cm−1) are observed. The D band indicates the presence of defects in sp2 hybridized carbon, while the G band is a characteristic of the in-plane vibration mode of sp2-bonded carbons. The recorded D and G values are in accordance with those previously reported for CNTs/TiO2 composites [6,14,15]. It is interesting to point out that a small shift to higher values was observed for both D and G bands compared to the Raman characteristics of pure CNTs [14,15,16], revealing the possible interaction between the CNTs and TiO2 [14,15]. Notably, a broad peak centered with its maximum at 680 cm−1 is observed in the spectra. This peak matches very well with the reported A1g vibration mode of CoO species [17]. Additionally, a peak hump is noticed at 610 cm−1, which is assigned to rutile [18]. The small peak that appeared at 892 cm−1 may possibly be related to C–C or C–O stretching vibrations of organic carbon traces that originate from the electrolyte used for the anodic oxidation [19,20]. In conclusion, the Raman investigation confirms the successful deposition of CNTs on the TiO2/CoO NT surface.

XRD analysis of the TiCo20 alloy in Figure 3a showed reflections in good agreement with those reported for both the β-Ti [21] and Ti2Co [22] phases. No or hardly detectable reflections are further observed in the as-anodized TiO2/CoO sample, indicating an amorphous state of the prepared nanotubes. Also, reflections for Ti metal can only be distinguished for the as-prepared TiO2 NTs (Figure 3b), proving a similar amorphous nature of such nanotubes. Sharp reflections are clearly shown in the diffractograms of both CNTs@TiO2/CoO NTs (Figure 3a) and CNT@TiO2 NTs samples, which are in accordance with the Bragg positions of rutile [23]. It is known from literature [24] that rutile is obtained at a temperature higher than 800 °C, which matches with the temperature required for spray pyrolysis to form CNTs.

Figure 3
XRD patterns of the Ti80Co20 alloy substrate, the as-anodized TiO2/CoO NTs, and the as-prepared CNTs@TiO2/CoO NTs (a); diffractograms of the as-anodized TiO2 and CNT@TiO2 NTs samples (b).

3.2. Electrochemical Testing

The electrochemical characteristics of bare TiO2/CoO and CNTs@TiO2/CoO NT nanocomposite electrodes were investigated in order to underline the synergetic effect of CNTs in the composite backbone. Since the lithium ions intercalate the CNTs at a potential lower than 1 V, the cells were measured between 0.1 and 3 V. Figure 4a shows typical CV curves obtained at a scan rate of 0.1 mV s−1 of a pure TiO2/CoO NT electrode, without CNTs. The recorded cyclic voltammograms of the TiO2 (shown in Figure S3, Supplementary Information) and TiO2/CoO NTs are, in general, consistent with previous studies suggesting a similar intercalation behavior [25,26,27]. Two broad signals are observed in the anodic and cathodic branches at 1.6 and 1.7 V vs. Li/Li+, respectively. This broadening in the anodic and cathodic sweeps is a special characteristic for an amorphous state of TiO2 and TiO2, mixed with another transition metal oxide [25,26]. No or hardly distinguishable signals are further detected in the following cycles:

Figure 4
Cyclic voltammograms of TiO2/CoO nanotubes (a) and CNTs@TiO2/CoO NTs (b), measured at scan rates of 0.1 mV·s−1 vs. Li/Li+.

These results indicate that the electrochemical insertion/removal reactions into/out of TiO2 and TiO2/CoO NT frameworks take place without phase transformation (as usually found for crystalline materials) [1,28,29]. Figure 4b depicts the CV curves of the CNTs@TiO2/CoO NT electrodes. The absence of sharp peaks and presence of two broad peaks in the anodic and cathodic branches at similar peak positions are consistent with the general CV behavior of rutile [30], and are attributed to a typical Li+ ion intercalation/deintercalation mechanism into or out of solid solution domains [30]. The corresponding anodic/cathodic signals are significantly shifted to the lower voltage of around 1 V vs. Li/Li+, compared to 1.6 and 1.8 V vs. Li/Li+ for the unmodified TiO2/CoO NTs (Figure 4a) and rutile [30], respectively. This shift in the peak potential is attributed to the presence of CNT layers that interconnect the TiO2/CoO NTs and enable high electrical conductivity (as well as a good lithium ion transport and, therewith, faster diffusion kinetics) [31]. Unlike TiO2/CoO NTs, no decrease in the current density of the redox signals occurs over cycling, indicating the good stability and better reversibility of the CNTs@TiO2/CoO NT electrode compared to the CNT-free electrode. These results already suggest that this composite electrode has a great potential as a promising anode for lithium ion batteries.

Figure 5a depicts the galvanostatic cycling performance of CNTs@TiO2 and CNTs@TiO2/CoO NT electrodes and the corresponding Coulombic efficiencies (CE) (evaluated at a current density of 50 µA·cm−2 between 0.01 and 3 V vs. Li/Li+). In the first cycle, both electrodes show a relatively low areal capacity when compared with the following cycles. This observation is in accordance with the previously described analysis of the cyclic voltammograms, where the current density in the first scan is slightly smaller (0.13 mA·cm−2) than those of the next sweeps (0.15 mA·cm−2). A possible activation of the electrode surface may be concluded to be the origin of this behavior [32].

Figure 5
Galvanostatic areal discharging capacities as a function of cycle number, obtained at a current density of 50 µA·cm−2 for CNTs@TiO2 and CNTs@TiO2/CoO NT anodes and their corresponding Coulombic efficiencies (CE) (a); cycling performance ...

It is noteworthy that the ternary CNTs@TiO2/CoO NT composite electrode exhibits an areal capacity of 460 µAh·cm−2, demonstrating excellent cycling stability over 50 charging/discharging cycles with a CE of ≈100%. Binary CNTs@TiO2 NT composite electrodes can deliver a capacity of 310 µAh·cm−2 (with a relatively higher CE (ca. 104%)) in the first ten cycles, reaching an efficiency of ca. 100% at the end of the 50th charging/discharging cycle. It is clear that the ternary CNTs@TiO2/CoO NT electrode displays around a 1.5-fold increase in capacity compared to the CNTs@TiO2 NT anode. Surprisingly, the binary CNTs@TiO2 and ternary CNTs@TiO2/CoO NT composites show significantly enhanced capacities, reaching up to a 1.5-fold increase in the 50th discharge cycle compared to the areal capacity of uncovered TiO2 and TiO2/CoO NT electrodes (which were tested at the same electrochemical conditions (Figure 5b)). The remarkable increase in the reversible capacity of the ternary composite is attributed to a good adhesion between the highly conductive, interlaced CNTs and the mixed oxide NTs. The boron-induced ‘elbow junctions’ of the robust CNT network further enhance the connectivity of the oxide NTs with the commonly used carbon additives, and thereby result in higher conductivities facilitating easier and faster electron transport and ion insertion/removal process. The high CE also implies a stable SEI formed on the surface of the CNTs and the oxide NTs, as well as a very low degradation of the electrolyte (due to a very low number of side reactions). As one of the components of the ternary oxide electrodes, CNTs may also contribute to the overall capacity of the cells. Hence, based on the capacity measurements conducted on the CNTs without the transition metal oxide nanotubes under identical electrochemical test conditions, we determined that the CNTs contribute only about 3.6% (16.8 µAh·cm−2) to the overall capacity (Figure S4, Supplementary information). Hence, the CNTs in the ternary composite electrodes mainly improve electrical connectivity and diffusion kinetics in the composite, and their storage ability can be neglected (especially when optimizing the potential window to higher potentials).

It is worth emphasizing the effect of the amorphicity and crystallinity of the TiO2 and TiO2/CoO NTs on the Li+ ion storage capacity at a current density of 50 µA·cm−2 (based on the results of the present study (Figure 5b) and our previous work) [12]. At the 50th charging/discharging cycle, the amorphous TiO2/CoO NTs deliver an areal capacity of 305 µAh·cm−2, which is higher than that found for TiO2/CoO NTs containing a phase mixture of crystalline anatase and rutile (280 µAh·cm−2). In addition, amorphous TiO2 NTs also show an improved areal capacity of 180 µAh·cm−2 compared to anatase (170 µAh·cm−2). The noticed enhancement in the insertion capacity of amorphous TiO2/CoO and TiO2 NTs is in accordance with previous observations, and is attributed to larger amount of disorders and defects in the amorphous structure than the crystalline one [27,33,34]. These defects offer bigger channels or more diffusion paths for Li+ ion migration. Nevertheless, crystallization of nanotube arrays during the CVD process carried out under 860 °C does not affect electrochemical performance, since much higher capacities are observed compared to amorphous or crystalline electrodes without a carbon coverage.

In order to determine the electrochemical performance of the CNT-covered anodes, the electrodes were cycled at different current densities (50–500 µA·cm−2), which are shown in Figure 6a. The CNTs@TiO2/CoO NT electrode is able to deliver an areal capacity of 455 µAh·cm−2 when cycled at a current rate of 50 µA·cm−2. Only an insignificant decrease in the areal capacity is observed when the current rate is increased from 50 to 500 µA·cm−2, still displaying an excellent areal capacity of about 400 µAh·cm−2. It is crucial to note that the electrode can reversibly retain the same areal capacity even after 80 charging/discharging cycles when the current rates are gradually decreased, demonstrating the outstanding rate performance of the composite electrode. The corresponding charging/discharging voltage profiles of CNTs@TiO2/CoO NT anodes obtained at various current densities (50–500 µA·cm−2) are shown in Figure 6b. Apparently, no distinct plateaus are detected in the voltage curves matching the cyclic voltammograms discussed above (Figure 4). Similar behavior in the rate capability was also detected for CNTs@TiO2 NT; however, it can only reach an areal capacity of around 300 and 256 µAh·cm−2 at current densities of 50 and 500 µA·cm−2, respectively. Interestingly, the voltage profile curves of CNTs@TiO2/CoO NT indicate that only a small decrease in the areal capacity will be achieved if the potential window is limited to 1.5 V. In consequence, the possibility to use such materials for practical applications is underlined. These findings clearly demonstrate the effectiveness of the tightly interlaced CNT network in greatly enhancing the rate performance of the CNTs@TiO2 and CNTs@TiO2/CoO NT electrodes. Table 1 shows a comparison of capacity and reported cycles of the electrode composite described in this study, with some nanostructured TiO2/CNTs and CoO/CNTs composites to allow a critical rating of the new material. To the best of our knowledge ternary TiO2/CoO-NT/CNT systems have not been reported for battery application yet, but TiO2/CoO nanoparticles decorated on CNTs were designated as photocatalysts [35].

Figure 6
Rate capability of CNTs@TiO2 and CNTs@TiO2/CoO NT anodes (a); typical voltage profiles vs. Li/Li+ for the 10th, 20th, 30th, 40th, and 50th cycles against the areal capacity of TiO2/CoO NT anodes (b) (measured at a current rate of 50, 100, 200, 400 and ...
Table 1
Performance of TiO2-CNTs and CoO/CNTs anode materials.

To gain further understanding of the effect of CNTs on the ionic conductivity of the synthesized composite anodes, electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) tests were performed for all the cells after 50 charging/discharging cycles. The Nyquist plots of all measured electrodes at 1.7 V vs. Li/Li+ are depicted in Figure 7a. The spectra show semicircles at high-to-medium frequency ranges, followed by inclined lines at the low frequency domain. It is known that the semicircles at high-to medium frequencies correspond to the charge transfer resistance accompanying lithium ion diffusion from the electrolyte towards the electrode/electrolyte interface [25,41,42]. The inclined lines represent lithium ion diffusion inside the electrode frameworks [12,42]. The CNTs@TiO2/CoO NT electrode exhibits the smallest semicircle, indicating the enhanced ionic conductivity compared to the other electrodes. Apparently, the CNT-covered electrodes show a smaller semicircle diameter than uncovered electrodes, confirming that the deposition of CNTs indeed lead to an improved ionic conductivity and, hence, enhance the electrochemical performance of lithium-ion insertion/extraction processes.

Figure 7
Nyquist plots of pure TiO2 NTs (pink triangles), TiO2/CoO NTs (blue triangles), TiO2 NTs covered with CNTs (red circles), and TiO2/CoO NTs covered with CNTs (black squares) (after 50 charging/discharging cycles, in the frequency range of 100 kHz to 0.1 ...

4. Conclusions

In our present study, we have demonstrated that a robust network of interconnected CNTs can be synthesized laterally on the surfaces of anodically grown TiO2 and TiO2/CoO nanotubes using a simple and quick, single-step, spray pyrolysis technique, leading to a successful fabrication of binary CNTs@TiO2 and ternary CNTs@TiO2/CoO nanotube composite electrodes. The electrochemical evaluation vs. the typical Li/Li+ reference electrode showed that the CNT-coated electrodes exhibit a 1.5-fold increase in the specific capacity compared to the uncoated anodes, along with a phenomenal rate performance between current densities of 50 and 500 µA·cm−2. The ternary CNTs@TiO2/CoO NT composite displays the best electrochemical performance among all tested electrodes. The remarkable electrochemical performance of the composite electrodes is attributed to the highly conductive CNTs interfacing the mixed TiO2/CoO NT framework, leading to exceptional electronic conductivity and charge transport. Secondly, the tightly interwoven CNT network may also serve as a second charge collector in conjunction with the alloy substrate, resulting in outstanding electrochemical performance. With this kind of composite electrode, it is possible to achieve excellent energy storage properties (even with electrically isolating oxide tube arrays); furthermore, we are able to significantly improve the electrical conductivity of the oxide nanotube electrodes, and thereby achieve a remarkable enhancement in their electrochemical performance (independent of the oxide morphology) by a simple surface modification step.

Acknowledgments

Financial support of the German Federal Ministry of Research and Education through the project ADNAMSES (grant no. 01DH14002) and of the Science and Technology Development Fund of Egypt (STDF) under the German-Egyptian Research Fund (project no. 5073) are gratefully acknowledged. The publication costs of this article are funded by the Open Access Fund of the Leibniz Association. We are grateful to Martin Knupfer and Marco Naumann for allowing us to use the Raman spectrometer.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/10/6/678/s1. Figure S1: STEM image of individual nanotubes (a) and the STEM-EDXS analysis confirming that the tubes are composed of Ti and Co oxides (b,c); Figure S2: SEM images showing pure TiO2 nanotubes prepared at 60 V on the Ti substrate (a) and surface overview after CNT covering at different magnifications (b–d); Figure S3: Cyclic voltammograms of pure TiO2 nanotubes (a) and CNTs@TiO2 NTs, measured at scan rates of 0.1 mV·s−1; Figure S4: Galvanostatic cycling of CNTs foam at a current rate of 446 mA·g−1 between 0.1 and 3 V.

Author Contributions

Author Contributions

Lars Giebeler, Nahla Ismail, and Mark Rümmeli conceived the project, designed the experiments, interpreted the results, contributed to the scientific discussion, and edited the article; Mahmoud Madian and Raghunandan Ummethala wrote the paper; Raghunandan Ummethala, Mahmoud Madian, and Ahmed Osama Abo El Naga performed the experiments, analyzed data, and interpreted results. Alexander Eychmüller contributed to scientific discussion, interpretation of results, and edited the article. All authors read and approved the final version before submission.

Conflicts of Interest

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

1. Yang M.C., Lee Y.Y., Xu B., Powers K., Meng Y.S. TiO2 flakes as anode materials for Li-ion-batteries. J. Power Sources. 2012;207:166–172. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.01.155. [Cross Ref]
2. Yoon S., Ka B.H., Lee C., Park M., Oh S.M. Preparation of nanotube TiO2-carbon composite and its anode performance in Lithium-ion batteries. Electrochem. Solid-State Lett. 2009;12:A28. doi: 10.1149/1.3035981. [Cross Ref]
3. Self E.C., Wycisk R., Pintauro P.N. Electrospun titania-based fibers for high areal capacity Li-ion battery anodes. J. Power Sources. 2015;282:187–193. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.02.036. [Cross Ref]
4. Mole F., Wang J., Clayton D.A., Xu C., Pan S. Highly conductive nanostructured C-TiO2 electrodes with enhanced electrochemical stability and double layer charge storage capacitance. Langmuir. 2012;28:10610–10619. doi: 10.1021/la300858d. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
5. Zou M., Ma Z., Wang Q., Yang Y., Wu S., Yang L., Hu S., Xu W., Han R.P.S., Zou R., et al. Coaxial TiO2-carbon nanotube sponges as compressible anodes for Lithium-ion Batteries. J. Mater. Chem. A. 2016;4:7398–7405. doi: 10.1039/C6TA01071G. [Cross Ref]
6. Hemalatha K., Prakash A.S., Guruprakash K., Jayakumar M. TiO2 coated carbon nanotubes for electrochemical energy storage. J. Mater. Chem. A. 2014;2:1757–1766. doi: 10.1039/C3TA13352D. [Cross Ref]
7. Liu J., Feng H., Jiang J., Qian D., Li J., Peng S., Liu Y. Anatase-TiO2/CNTs nanocomposite as a superior high-rate anode material for lithium-ion batteries. J. Alloys Compd. 2014;603:144–148. doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2014.03.089. [Cross Ref]
8. Wang J., Ran R., Tade M.O., Shao Z. Self-assembled mesoporous TiO2/carbon nanotube composite with a three-dimensional conducting nanonetwork as a high-rate anode material for lithium-ion battery. J. Power Sources. 2014;254:18–28. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.12.090. [Cross Ref]
9. Trang N.T.H., Ali Z., Kang D.J. Mesoporous TiO2 spheres interconnected by multiwalled carbon nanotubes as an anode for high-performance lithium ion batteries. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2015;7:3676–3683. doi: 10.1021/am508158v. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
10. Zhu P., Wu Y., Reddy M.V., Sreekumaran Nair A., Chowdari B.V.R., Ramakrishna S. Long term cycling studies of electrospun TiO2 nanostructures and their composites with MWCNTs for rechargeable Li-ion batteries. RSC Adv. 2012;2:531–537. doi: 10.1039/C1RA00514F. [Cross Ref]
11. Peng Y., Chen Z., Le Z., Xu Q., Li H., Lu Y. Mesoporous crystalline–amorphous oxide nanocomposite network for high-performance lithium storage. Chem. Commun. 2015;51:12056–12059. doi: 10.1039/C5CC03534A. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
12. Madian M., Giebeler L., Klose M., Jaumann T., Uhlemann M., Gebert A., Oswald S., Ismail N., Eychmüller A., Eckert J. Self-organized TiO2/CoO nanotubes as potential anode materials for Lithium Ion batteries. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2015;3:909–919. doi: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.5b00026. [Cross Ref]
13. Ummethala R., Fritzsche M., Jaumann T., Balach J., Oswald S., Nowak R., Sobczak N., Kaban I., Rümmeli M.H., Giebeler L. Lightweight, free-standing 3D interconnected carbon nanotube foam as a flexible sulfur host for high performance lithium-sulfur battery cathodes. Energy Storage Mater. 2017 doi: 10.1016/j.ensm.2017.04.004. [Cross Ref]
14. Wen Z., Ci S., Mao S., Cui S., Lu G., Yu K., Luo S., He Z., Chen J. TiO2 nanoparticles-decorated carbon nanotubes for significantly improved bioelectricity generation in microbial fuel cells. J. Power Sources. 2013;234:100–106. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.01.146. [Cross Ref]
15. Zhu L.W., Zhou L.K., Li H.X., Wang H.F., Lang J.P. One-pot growth of free-standing CNTs/TiO2 nanofiber membrane for enhanced photocatalysis. Mater. Lett. 2013;95:13–16. doi: 10.1016/j.matlet.2013.01.004. [Cross Ref]
16. Kumar R., Cronin S.B. Raman scattering of carbon nanotube bundles under axial strain and strain-induced debundling. Phys. Rev. B. 2007;75:1–4. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.75.155421. [Cross Ref]
17. Choi H.C., Jung Y.M., Noda I., Kim S.B. A study of the mechanism of the electrochemical reaction of lithium with CoO by two-dimensional soft X-ray absorption spectroscopy (2D XAS), 2D Raman, and 2D Heterospectral XAS-Raman correlation analysis. J. Phys. Chem. B. 2003;107:5806–5811. doi: 10.1021/jp030438w. [Cross Ref]
18. Hardcastle F.D. Raman spectroscopy of titania (TiO2) nanotubular water-splitting catalysts. J. Ark. Acad. Sci. 2011;65:43–48.
19. Likodimos V., Stergiopoulos T., Falaras P., Kunze J., Schmuki P. Phase composition, size, orientation, and antenna effects of self-assembled anodized titania nanotube arrays; a polarized micro-raman investigation. J. Phys. Chem. C. 2008;112:12687–12696. doi: 10.1021/jp8027462. [Cross Ref]
20. Rüdiger C., Favaro M., Valero-Vidal C., Calvillo L., Bozzolo N., Jacomet S., Hejny C., Gregoratti L., Amati M., Agnoli S., et al. Fabrication of Ti substrate grain dependent C/TiO2 composites through carbothermal treatment of anodic TiO2. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2016;18:9220–9231. doi: 10.1039/C5CP07727C. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
21. Burgers W.G., Jacobs F.M. Crystal structure of β-titanium. Z. Kristallogr. 1936;94:299–300.
22. Skripov A.V., Buzlukov A.L., Soloninin A.V., Voronin V.I., Berger I.F., Udovic T.J., Huang Q., Rush J.J. Hydrogen motion and site occupation in Ti2CoHx(Dx): NMR and neutron scattering studies. Physica B. 2007;392:353–360. doi: 10.1016/j.physb.2006.12.002. [Cross Ref]
23. Burdett J.K., Hughbanks T., Miller G.J., Richardson J.W., Smith J.V. Structural-electronic relationships in inorganic solids: Powder neutron diffraction studies of the rutile and anatase polymorphs of titanium dioxide at 15 and 295 K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1987;109:3639–3646. doi: 10.1021/ja00246a021. [Cross Ref]
24. Shannon R.D., Pask J.A. Kinetics of the anatase-rutile transformation. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 1965;48:391–398. doi: 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1965.tb14774.x. [Cross Ref]
25. Madian M., Klose M., Jaumann T., Gebert A., Oswald S., Ismail N., Eychmüller A., Eckert J., Giebeler L. Anodically fabricated TiO2–SnO2 nanotubes and their application in lithium ion batteries. J. Mater. Chem. A. 2016;2:5542–5552. doi: 10.1039/C6TA00182C. [Cross Ref]
26. Xie M., Sun X., Zhou C., Cavanagh A.S., Sun H., Hu T., Wang G., Lian J., George S.M. Amorphous ultrathin TiO2 atomic layer deposition films on carbon nanotubes as anodes for Lithium Ion batteries. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2015;162:A974–A981. doi: 10.1149/2.0501506jes. [Cross Ref]
27. Fang H.T., Liu M., Wang D.W., Sun T., Guan D.S., Li F., Zhou J., Sham T.K., Cheng H.M. Comparison of the rate capability of nanostructured amorphous and anatase TiO2 for lithium insertion using anodic TiO2 nanotube arrays. Nanotechnology. 2009;20:225701. doi: 10.1088/0957-4484/20/22/225701. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
28. Wen R.T., Niklasson G.A., Granqvist C.G. Eliminating electrochromic degradation in amorphous TiO2 through Li-ion detrapping. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2016;8:5777–5782. doi: 10.1021/acsami.6b00457. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
29. Wagemaker M., Borghols W.J.H., Mulder F.M. Large Impact of particle size on insertion reactions. a case for anatase LixTiO2. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007;129:4323–4327. doi: 10.1021/ja067733p. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
30. Kubiak P., Pfanzelt M., Geserick J., Hörmann U., Hüsing N., Kaiser U., Wohlfahrt-Mehrens M. Electrochemical evaluation of rutile TiO2 nanoparticles as negative electrode for Li-ion batteries. J. Power Sources. 2009;194:1099–1104. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.06.021. [Cross Ref]
31. Gao X., Zhu H., Pan G., Ye S., Lan Y., Wu F., Song D. Preparation and electrochemical characterization of anatase nanorods for Lithium-inserting electrode material. J. Phys. Chem. B. 2004;108:2868–2872. doi: 10.1021/jp036821i. [Cross Ref]
32. Ding S., Chen J.S., Lou X.W.D. One-dimensional hierarchical structures composed of novel metal oxide nanosheets on a carbon nanotube backbone and their lithium-storage properties. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2011;21:4120–4125. doi: 10.1002/adfm.201100781. [Cross Ref]
33. Guan D., Cai C., Wang Y. Amorphous and crystalline TiO2 nanotube arrays for enhanced Li-ion intercalation properties. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 2011;11:3641–3650. doi: 10.1166/jnn.2011.3765. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
34. Xiong H., Yildirim H., Shevchenko E.V., Prakapenka V.B., Koo B., Slater M.D., Balasubramanian M., Sankaranarayanan S.K.R.S., Greeley J.P., Tepavcevic S., et al. Self-improving anode for Lithium-Ion batteries based on amorphous to cubic phase transition in TiO2 nanotubes. J. Phys. Chem. C. 2012;116:3181–3187. doi: 10.1021/jp210793u. [Cross Ref]
35. Dlamini L.N., Krause R.W., Kulkami G.U., Durbach S.H. Synthesis and characterization of titania based binary metal oxide nanocomposite as potential environmental photocatalysts. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2011;129:406–410. doi: 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2011.04.033. [Cross Ref]
36. Yan L., Xu Y., Zhou M., Chen G., Deng S., Smirnov S., Luo H., Zou G. Porous TiO2 conformal coating on carbon nanotubes as energy storage materials. Electrochim. Acta. 2015;169:73–81. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2015.04.061. [Cross Ref]
37. He L., Wang C., Yao X., Ma R., Wang H., Chen P., Zhang K. Synthesis of carbon nanotube/mesoporous TiO2 coaxial nanocables with enhanced lithium ion battery performance. Carbon. 2014;75:345–352. doi: 10.1016/j.carbon.2014.04.013. [Cross Ref]
38. Wen Z., Ci S., Mao S., Cui S., He Z., Chen J. CNT@TiO2 nanohybrids for high-performance anode of lithium-ion batteries. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2013;8:499. doi: 10.1186/1556-276X-8-499. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
39. Wu F.D., Wang Y. Self-assembled echinus-like nanostructures of mesoporous CoO nanorod@CNT for lithium-ion batteries. J. Mater. Chem. 2011;21:6636–6641. doi: 10.1039/c0jm04346j. [Cross Ref]
40. Kim J.C., Hwang I.S., Seo S.D., Kim D.W. Nanocomposite Li-ion battery anodes consisting of multiwalled carbon nanotubes that anchor CoO nanoparticles. Mater. Lett. 2013;104:13–16. doi: 10.1016/j.matlet.2013.04.013. [Cross Ref]
41. Wang Y., Liu S., Huang K., Fang D., Zhuang S. Electrochemical properties of freestanding TiO2 nanotube membranes annealed in Ar for lithium anode material. J. Solid State Electrochem. 2012;16:723–729. doi: 10.1007/s10008-011-1417-5. [Cross Ref]
42. Han H., Song T., Lee E.K., Devadoss A., Jeon Y., Ha J., Chung Y.C., Choi Y.M., Jung Y.G., Paik U. Dominant factors governing the rate capability of a TiO2 nanotube anode for high power lithium ion batteries. ACS Nano. 2012;6:8308–8315. doi: 10.1021/nn303002u. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]

Articles from Materials are provided here courtesy of Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)